Evaluation Forum
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
4 Main Ideas and Supporting Details in Writing
4 Main Ideas and Supporting Details in Writing A paragraph is a series of sentences that support a main idea, or point. A paragraph typically starts with the main idea or point (also called the topic sentence), and the rest of the paragraph provides specific details to support and develop the point. The illustration below shows the relationship between point and support. Support Support Support Support Outlining An outline is a helpful way to plan a paper or to analyze it. An outline shows at a glance the point of a paper and a numbered list of the items that support the point. Here is an example of a paragraph and an outline of the paragraph. 1People in my family love our dog Punch. 2However, I have several reasons for wanting to get rid of Punch. 3First of all, he knows I don’t like him. 4Sometimes he gives me an evil look and curls his top lip back to show me his teeth. 5The message is clearly, “Someday I’m going to bite you.” 6Another reason to get rid of Punch is he sheds everywhere. 7Every surface in our house is covered with Punch hair. 8I spend more time brushing it off my clothes than I do mowing the lawn. 9Last of all, Punch is an early riser, while (on weekends) I am not. 10He will start barking and whining to go outside at 7 a.m., and it’s my job to take care of him. 11When I told my family that I had a list of good reasons for getting rid of Punch, they said they would make up a list of reasons to get rid of me. -
Private. Lives
JJLJ-L, I ..}u.... t I 4.rl @ THE UNIVERSITY THEATRE 1950·51 Season Films and Plays THE September 6-8: Opm City, Italian .film 21, 22: j ean Cocteau's B.eauty and the Beast, French film UNIVERSITY 28,29: The Dam11ed, French film OF October ~. 6: Antoine and AntoitJette, French film 12, 13: BJ(ape from Yesterday, French film HAWAII 19,20: The Raven, French film 26,27: The Barber of Seville, French Opera Comique film THEATRE November 7, 11: Theatre Group production of Lawrence and Armina Langner's THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS GROUP 14-18: THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS 24-25: Pagnol's Marius, French film December 1, 2: Pagnol's Cnar, French film 7·9: Cage of Nightingales, French film 30: Theatre Group production of Bernard Shaw's MAJOR BARBARA January 5, 6: MAJOR BARBARA 10-13: MAJOR BARBARA February 8, 9: Jouvet in Between Eleven and Midnight, French film 15, 16: Gigi, French film \ 22,23: Kreutzer Sonata, French film March 15-17: Theatre Group.production of THE HOUSE OF SUGAWARA, a newly NOEL COWARD'S translated Kabuki play 20-24: THE HOUSE OF SUGAWARA 27·29: THE HOUSE OF SUGAW ARA 30, 31: Light of India, Indian film PRIVATE. LIVES April 6: T!Je Ghost Goes Wm, American fil~ 13: Museum of Modern Art film, the Marx Brothers in Dudz Soup 14: Shoeshine, Italian film 21-22: Theatre Group production of William Wycherly's THE COUNTRY WIFE 25-28: THE COUNTRY WIFE May 2, 3, 5: The Soul of ChinR, Chinese film 4: Museum of Modem Art film, Garbo in Annt~ Chrhtie 11·12: Theatre Group production of FOUR ORIGINAL PRIZE PLAYS 17·19: FOUR ORIGINAL PRIZE PLAYS June 1: Museum of Modem Art film, Chaplin's Essanay Comedies 8,9: Theatre Group production of Noel Coward's PRIVATE LIVES 14-16: PRIVATE LIVES JUNE 8, 9, 14. -
Peter Conti-Brown*
CONTI-BROWN 64 STAN. L. REV. 409 (DO NOT DELETE) 2/16/2012 3:58 PM ELECTIVE SHAREHOLDER LIABILITY Peter Conti-Brown* Government bailouts are expensive, unjust, and unpopular, and they usually represent dramatic deviations from the rule of law. They are also, in some cases, necessary. The problem that bailouts pose, then, is that they are almost always inimical to the interests of society, except when they are not. This complexity is ignored under the recent Dodd-Frank Act, which improbably guarantees an end to taxpayer bailouts. Indeed, much of the Act makes bailouts more likely, not less, by making the wrong kind of bailouts available far too often. This Article proposes to solve the problem of bailouts by retaining governmental ability to make the right kinds of bailouts possible through forcing the bailed-out firms to internalize the bailout costs. The proposal—called “elective shareholder liability”—allows bank shareholders two options. They must either change their bank’s capital structure to include dramatically less debt, consistent with the consensus recommendation of leading economists; or alternatively, they must add a bailout exception to their bank’s limited- shareholder-liability status, thus requiring shareholders—not taxpayers—to cover the ultimate costs of the bank’s failure. This liability would be structured as a governmental collection, similar to a tax assessment, for the recoupment of all bailout costs against the shareholders on a pro rata basis. It would also include an up-front stay on collections to ensure that there are, in fact, taxpayer losses to be recouped and to mitigate government incentives for overbailout, political manipulation, and crisis exacerbation. -
The Future of Work of Future The
Communications and Society Program Bollier THE FUTURE OF WORK What It Means for Individuals, Businesses, Markets and Governments THE FUTURE OF WORK By David Bollier Publications Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, MD 21658 11-003 THE FUTURE OF WORK What It Means for Individuals, Businesses, Markets and Governments By David Bollier Communications and Society Program Charles M. Firestone Executive Director Washington, D.C. 2011 To purchase additional copies of this report, please contact: The Aspen Institute Publications Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: (410) 820-5326 Fax: (410) 827-9174 E-mail: [email protected] For all other inquiries, please contact: The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 736-5818 Fax: (202) 467-0790 Charles M. Firestone Patricia K. Kelly Executive Director Assistant Director Copyright © 2011 by The Aspen Institute This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Published in the United States of America in 2010 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0-89843-543-9 11/004 Contents FOREWORD, Charles M. Firestone .............................................................vii THE FUTURE OF WORK: WHAT IT MEANS FOR INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, MARKETS AND GOVERNMENTS, David Bollier Introduction ............................................................................................... -
White House Staffs: a Study
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-1997 White House Staffs: A Study Eric Jackson Stansell University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Stansell, Eric Jackson, "White House Staffs: A Study" (1997). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/241 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT - APPROVAL Name: _Er~ __ ~t~~~g.Jl ____________________________________ _ College: J:..t"j.§_~ __~=i.~~~,=-~___ Department: _Cc:.ti~:a-t:;..-_~~_~~l~!:"~ __ - Faculty Mentor: __Q~!.. ___ M~~69&-1 ___ f~j"k%~.r~ld _________________ _ PROJECT TITLE: __~_\i.hik_H<?.~&_~t",-{:f~~ __ ~__ ~jM-/_: ________ _ I have reviewed this completed senior honors thesis with this student and certify that it is a project commensurate with honors level undergraduate research in this field. Signed: ~~#_~::t~~ Faculty Mentor ______________ , Date: ~/l7.t-~EL ______ --- Comments (Optional): "White House Staffs: A Study" by Eric Stansell August 11, 1997 "White House StatTs: A Study" by Eric Stansell Abstract In its current form, the modem presidency consists of much more than just a single individual elected to serve as the head of government. -
Private Lives and Public Leadership
DiscernmentSo that you may be able to discern what is best. Phil. 1:10 Private Lives and Public Leadership ■ For many Americans, the impeachment trial Can a homemaker live a life secreted away from Inside: of William Jefferson Clinton is merely another the family, behind a closed door, without it bear- opportunity to express disgust with government ing fruit in the more public parts of one’s house? Where Should We and an invasive news media. In the following pages, our authors sharp- Draw the Line? 2 Although ample justification exists to en our capacity to judge more justly and com- regret the impeachment process, I am disap- passionately.As we stretch our moral faculty, A Case for pointed in one of the most frequently stated may our eyes be opened to see God’s eternal Telling More 4 reasons—the wish that Congress would put the wisdom come to bear on the intractable moral president’s personal matters aside and “get on decisions of everyday life. God Cannot with the business of the coun- I am pleased to introduce Be Privatized 6 try.” I respond,Why should we our new editor, Mr. Stan separate a president’s moral Guthrie. He has big shoes to Panelists Explore choices from the business of the “Why should we fill, taking over for our col- Theme During country? Aren’t questions of league, Mark Fackler. Mark Roundtable 8 truth-telling, personal integrity, separate a ended his superb run as editor and legal process central to the president’s moral this past summer with his move The Link Between citizen-formation process? from Wheaton to Calvin Private Lives We must recognize the choices from the College. -
Michael Krasny Has Interviewed a Wide Range of Major Political and Cultural Figures Including Edward Albee, Madeleine Albright
Michael Krasny has interviewed a wide range of major political and cultural figures including Edward Albee, Madeleine Albright, Sherman Alexei, Robert Altman, Maya Angelou, Margaret Atwood, Ken Auletta, Paul Auster, Richard Avedon, Joan Baez, Alec Baldwin, Dave Barry, Harry Belafonte, Annette Bening, Wendell Berry, Claire Bloom, Andy Borowitz, T.S. Boyle, Ray Bradbury, Ben Bradlee, Bill Bradley, Stephen Breyer, Tom Brokaw, David Brooks, Patrick Buchanan, William F. Buckley Jr, Jimmy Carter, James Carville, Michael Chabon, Noam Chomsky, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Cesar Chavez, Bill Cosby, Sandra Cisneros, Billy Collins, Pat Conroy, Francis Ford Coppola, Jacques Cousteau, Michael Crichton, Francis Crick, Mario Cuomo, Tony Curtis, Marc Danner, Ted Danson, Don DeLillo, Gerard Depardieu, Junot Diaz, Leonardo DiCaprio, Joan Didion, Maureen Dowd. Jennifer Egan, Daniel Ellsberg, Rahm Emanuel, Nora Ephron, Susan Faludi, Diane Feinstein, Jane Fonda, Barney Frank, Jonathan Franzen, Lady Antonia Fraser, Thomas Friedman, Carlos Fuentes, John Kenneth Galbraith, Andy Garcia, Jerry Garcia, Robert Gates, Newt Gingrich, Allen Ginsberg, Malcolm Gladwell, Danny Glover, Jane Goodall, Stephen Greenblatt, Matt Groening, Sammy Hagar, Woody Harrelson, Robert Hass, Werner Herzog, Christopher Hitchens, Nick Hornby, Khaled Hosseini, Patricia Ireland, Kazuo Ishiguro, Molly Ivins, Jesse Jackson, PD James, Bill T. Jones, James Earl Jones, Ashley Judd, Pauline Kael, John Kerry, Tracy Kidder, Barbara Kingsolver, Alonzo King, Galway Kinnell, Ertha Kitt, Paul Krugman, Ray -
Administration Officials' Biographies
THE PRESIDENT ’S MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD Administration Officials Senior Executive Service (SES) Session Scott Gould, Deputy Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs Seth Harris, Deputy Secretary, Department of Labor Christine Kluh, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs David Lebryk, Commissioner of the Financial Management Service, Department of the Treasury Katie Malague, Performance Manager, White House Office of Management and Budget Catherine Murphy, Regional Solicitor, Department of Labor Stephen Shih, Deputy Associate Director for Executive Resources and Employee Development, Office of Personnel Management Denise Wells, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Chief Human Capital Officer, Department of Health and Human Services W. SCOTT GOULD, DEPUTY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS W. Scott Gould was nominated by President Obama to serve as Deputy Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and subsequently confirmed by the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee on April 2, 2009. As Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Gould serves as the chief operating officer of the federal government's second largest department, responsible for a nationwide system of health care services, benefits programs and national cemeteries for America’s veterans and their dependents. Prior to his appointment to the VA, Gould was Vice President for public sector strategy at IBM Global Business Services where he focused on strategy and innovation. Previously, he was Chief Executive Officer of The O’Gara Company, a strategic advisory and investment services firm, and Chief Operating Officer of Exolve, a technology services company. The former Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary for Administration at the Department of Commerce, Gould has also served as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Finance and Management at the Treasury Department. -
Speaker Listing
SPEAKER LISTING 2020-21 2010-11 Harrison Hickman ’75 | Peniel Joseph Majora Carter | David Brooks | President Bill Clinton John Avlon & Margaret Hoover (w/Mark Updegrove) Jeannette Walls | Jean-Michel Cousteau Ian Bremmer | Sally Field (w/Pat Mitchell) Paul Nicklen | Theresa May | Colson Whitehead 2009-10 Garry Trudeau | Yo-Yo Ma | Paul Krugman 2019-20 Anna Deavere Smith | David Gregory Laura Bush | Stephen Breyer Doris Kearns Goodwin (w/Mark Updegrove) 2008-09 Khaled Hosseini | Christiane Amanpour & James Rubin 2018-19 Sir Salman Rushdie | Anthony Bourdain @ DPAC Karl Rove & David Axelrod | Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Anna Quindlen Julia Gillard | Dr. Paul Farmer | Diana Nyad 2007-08 2017-18 Kathleen Turner, Louis Gossett Jr. & Jane Seymour Joe & Jill Biden | Lisa Genova | Leslie Odom Jr. Isabel Allende | J.C. Watts | Bob Woodward Reza Aslan | Ted Koppel | Brandon Stanton 2006-07 2016-17 Mary Robinson | David McCullough | Toni Morrison Michael Pollan | Mark & Scott Kelly | Amal Clooney Neil deGrasse Tyson | Bryan Stevenson | Alan Alda 2005-06 Karen Armstrong | Desmond Tutu | Bill Moyers 2015-16 *Garrison Keillor (2 shows) Robin Wright | Atul Gawande | Jon Meacham 2004 - 05 George Takei | Malcolm Gladwell Cokie Roberts | Mikhail Gorbachev | Mary Pipher 2014-15 Michael Beschloss Ron Howard (w/Leonard Maltin) | Bill Bryson 2003-04 Margaret Atwood (w/ Roger Rosenblatt) Dr. Sherwin Nuland | Edward Albee | Ken Burns Robert Reich | Anderson Cooper Sidney Poitier | George J. Mitchell 2013-14 2002-03 Robert Gates | Robert Ballard | Itzhak Perlman Ernest Gaines | Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Elizabeth Alexander | Steve Kroft and Lesley Stahl 2001-02 2012-13 Madeleine Albright | Oscar Arias and Ralph Nader Tina Brown | Tom Brokaw | Geoffrey Canada Bill Bradley, Jeb Bush and Gwen Ifill 2000-01 Thomas Friedman Doris Kearns Goodwin | Jack Miles | Bill Bradley Neil deGrasse Tyson 2011-12 Tony Blair | Twyla Tharp | Sanjay Gupta 1999 *David McCullough @ Reynolds Auditorium Colin Powell Ken Burns | Fareed Zakaria 1996 Thomas Friedman. -
9929555.PDF (7.296Mb)
INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Infonnation Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE WARRING FACTIONS: SENATORS, NOMINEES, AND INTEREST GROUPS IN THE SENATE CONFIRMATION PROCESS A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By LAUREN MICHELLE COHEN Norman, Oklahoma 1999 ÜMI Number: 9929555 UMI Microform 9929555 Copyright 1999, by UMI Company. -
The Relationship of Personal Morality to Lawyering and Professional Ethics
Pace Law Review Volume 21 Issue 2 Spring 2001 Article 2 April 2001 Private Lives and Professional Responsibilities? The Relationship of Personal Morality to Lawyering and Professional Ethics Carrie Menkel-Meadow Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr Recommended Citation Carrie Menkel-Meadow, Private Lives and Professional Responsibilities? The Relationship of Personal Morality to Lawyering and Professional Ethics, 21 Pace L. Rev. 365 (2001) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol21/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Essays Private Lives and Professional Responsibilities? The Relationship of Personal Morality to Lawyering and Professional Ethics The Philip B. Blank Lecture on Attorney Ethics Pace Law School, October 19, 2000 Professor Carrie Menkel-Meadow' © 2000 Table of Contents I. The Problems ..... ........................ 366 II. Philosophical Solutions ............................ 374 III. Practical Solutions: How Should A Lawyer's Private Life or Personal Morality Affect Professional Responsibility? .... .... ............. 387 1. Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center and Chair, CPR-Ge- orgetown Commission on Ethics and Standards in ADR, Visiting Professor, Harvard Law School, Spring 2001. Thanks to my host, Steven Goldberg and his many fine colleagues at Pace for their hospitality and good (and critical) comments on my lecture, especially my friend Vanessa Merton whose critical counsel I al- ways appreciate. Thanks also to Mrs. Philip Blank for good and caring conversa- tion, for whom I wish the best. -
PAUL EVAN PETERS Global Digital in Support Of
PAUL EVAN PETERS Director Coalition for Networked Information Washington, DC Progress Toward and Prospects for a Global Digital Information Infrastructure in Support of Research and Education* INTRODUCTION I want to do several things in this presentation. The first is provide some basic information about what is being called the information superhighways measures already proposed by the Clinton administration and already acted on by the 103rd Congress. It was only in February 1993 that two major proposals responsive to the theme of this conference were put forth, and they were acted on by the 103rd Congress when it passed the president's budget. Some things remain to be reconciled, but these provisions of the president's budget were not controversial in the House and Senate debates in late March. So, they've already found their way pretty far down the road of this new administration's policy. There are a lot of new policy initiatives in the realm of global networking, but I'm going to focus on just a very small part of it. The second thing I want to do is to call attention to the characteristics of four of the constituencies that are the most active and influential in shaping how issues are defined and how public policies are formulated in the areas of networks and networked information. I really think these four constituencies have been competing for public attention for quite a while now. It is important to reflect upon what each of these four constituencies has to offer because my opinion is that there has to be something that comes out of this process for each of these constituencies, otherwise we won't get what we all want a universally better world as a result of all this.