Cambridge Farmland Birds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cambridge Farmland Birds Cambridge Farmland Birds Breeding and Wintering Bird Survey Report Produced for Cambridgeshire County Council By Applied Ecology Ltd October 2014 Document Control: Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1.0 May 2014 Final PTM DP DP Prepared for: Cambridgeshire Counnty Council Title: Cambridge Farmland Birds: Breeding and Wintering Bird Survey Report Project nummber: AEL0704 Document version: 1.0 Document status: Final Document date: 10.10.14 Signed on behalf of Applied Ecology Ltd: Dr Duncan Painter Director APPLIED ECOLOGY LTD St. John's Innovation Centre Cowley Road Cambridge CB4 0WS Tel: 01223 422 116 Fax: 01223 420 844 Mobile: 07725 811 777 Email: [email protected] Applied Ecology Ltd Cambridge Farmland Birds Contents 1 Introduction 1 Background 1 Aims 2 Legislation & Planning Context 4 2 Survey Approach 9 Methods 9 3 Survey Findings 13 Breeding Bird Species, Diversity and Density 13 Wildlife & Countryside Act Schedule 1 Species 14 Breeding Territory Densities 14 Wintering Birds 15 Brown Hare 23 4 Conclusions and Recommendations 25 Conclusions 25 Recommendations 26 Appendix 1 29 Complete breeding bird survey data 29 Tables Table 2.1 Farmland bird species and their conservation designations. 10 Table 3.1 Comparison of territory density figures for key farmland bird species between land South of Cambridge and RSPB Hope Farm, Cambridgeshire 15 Table 3.2 Abundance and peak counts of species recorded during Breeding Bird Surveys of Cambridgeshire County Council farmland, listed in descending order of peak abundance. 17 Table 3.3 Abundance and peak counts of species recorded during winter bird surveys of Cambridgeshire County Council farmland, listed in descending order of peak abundance. 19 Table 3.4 Brown Hare observations 23 Figures Figure 1.1 Site location plan 3 14 October 2014 Applied Ecology Ltd Cambridge Farmland Birds Figure 4.1 Breeding bird territories (a) 20 Figure 4.2 Breeding bird territories (b) 21 Figure 4.3 Breeding bird territories (c) 22 14 October 2014 Applied Ecology Ltd Cambridge Farmland Birds 1 Introduction Background 1.1 Applied Ecology Ltd (AEL) was commissioned by Cambridgeshire County Council to carry out breeding and wintering bird surveys of proposed potential development land on the outskirts of the City of Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, centred on the National Grid reference TL479545. The site location plan and fields surveyed are detailed in Figure 1.1. 1.2 At the time of survey the area consisted of arable farmland growing a variety of crops including wheat, oilseed rape and barley, with field boundaries delineated by hedgerows. 1.3 Cambridgeshire County Council is in the process of completing a draft revision of its Local Plan (2014). The plan has included site assessments for additional releases of existing Green Belt land to meet housing requirements. This work has identified two sites to the southeast of the City on the edge of the Chalk slope, either side of Wort’s Causeway. 1.4 This land has been identified as having the potential to support populations of declining farmland bird species, as well as brown hare Lepus europaeus. Thus far these records are incidental observations by the City Nature Conservation Officer, however, a local resident has been conducting breeding bird surveys which appear to confirm that these sites do support potentially important bird populations. 1.5 The objective of the surveys was to establish the presence and/or absence of breeding and wintering farmland birds on the proposed sites and surrounding farmland. The rationale being to identify the feasibility and likely requirement for mitigation and compensation both on and off site. These bird surveys are designed to pre‐empt and inform the ecological surveys and recommendation required, should a developer submit a full or outline planning application in the future. 1.6 Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy (2011) identifies this area of chalk hills as potential for ‘landscape scale’ habitat creation. Returning arable farmland to chalk grassland, linking Cherry Hinton Chalks Pits, The Beech Woods, Wandlebury, Gog Magogs and Nine Wells Local Nature Reserve. The realisation of such a vision could include significant habitat for declining farmland birds if approached correctly. 1 14 October 2014 Applied Ecology Ltd Cambridge Farmland Birds Aims 1.7 The aims of this report are to: inform the relevant committee of survey results to date provide recommendations for further survey work define the local / regional significance of the populations identified identify potential mitigation requirements and feasibility 2 14 October 2014 Cambridge Farmland Birds Site Location fields surveyed 3 5 4 1 6 2 Figure 1.1 Map Scale @ A4: 1:50,000 Surveyed by: PTM & DP Survey date: 11/2013 - 06/2014 Drawn by: RAH 0 0.5 1 km Checked by: PTM ´ Status: Draft Reproduced from Ordnance Survey digital map data © Crown copyright 2013. All rights reserved. AELCB0704_001-01_fields_20140923 A4 23/09/2014 Applied Ecology Ltd Cambridge Farmland Birds Legislation & Planning Context Wildlife & Countryside Act 1.8 The Wildlife and Countryside Act (WCA) 1981 (as amended) provides the main legal framework for nature conservation and species protection in the UK. 1.9 Under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) it is illegal to: Recklessly or intentionally kill, injure or take any wild animals included in Schedule 5. Recklessly or intentionally damage or destroy, or obstruct access to any structure or place which any wild animal included in Schedule 5 uses for shelter or protection. Recklessly or intentionally disturb any such animal while it is occupying a structure or place which it uses for shelter or protection. Birds 1.10 All UK species of wild bird, their nests and eggs are protected by law (for the whole or part of the year) by the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended and strengthened by the Countryside and Rights of Way (CROW) Act 2000). The Act makes it an offence (with exception to species listed in Schedule 2) to intentionally: kill, injure, or take any wild bird, take, damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird while that nest is in use or being built (also [take, damage or destroy the nest of a wild bird included in Schedule ZA1] under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006), or take or destroy an egg of any wild bird. Schedule 1 species 1.11 Special penalties are available for offences related to birds listed on Schedule 1, for which there are additional offences of disturbing these birds at their nests, or their dependent young. The Secretary of State may also designate Areas of Special Protection (subject to exceptions) to provide further protection to birds. The Act also prohibits certain methods of killing, injuring, or taking birds, restricts the sale and possession of captive bred birds, and sets standards for keeping birds in captivity. Population status 1.12 The population status of birds regularly found in the UK, Channel Islands and the Isle of Man is reviewed every five years to provide an up‐to‐date assessment of conservation priorities1. A total of 247 species has been assessed and placed onto 1 Gregory, R D; Wilkinson, N I; Noble, D G; Robinson, J A; Brown, A F; Hughes, J; Procter, D A; Gibbons, D W and Galbraith, C A (2002) The Population Status of Birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man: an Analysis of Conservation Concern 2002‐2007. British Birds 95: 410‐450 4 14 October 2014 Applied Ecology Ltd Cambridge Farmland Birds one of three lists of Conservation Concern . Red, Amber and Green. Forty species are Red‐listed, 121 are Amber‐listed and 86 are Green‐listed. 1.13 Seven quantitative criteria are used to assess the population status of each species and to place it on the Red, Amber or Green list. These are: global conservation status, recent decline, historical decline, European conservation status, rare breeders, localised species and international importance. Red‐listed species are those that are Globally Threatened according to the IUCN criteria; those whose populations or ranges have declined rapidly in recent years; and those that have declined historically and not shown a substantial recent recovery. Amber‐listed species are those with an unfavourable conservation status in Europe; species whose populations or ranges have declined moderately in recent years; those whose populations have declined historically but made a substantial recent recovery; rare breeders; and those with internationally important or localised populations. Green‐listed species are those that do not fulfil any of the Red‐ or Amber‐list criteria and they are not considered further in this report. UK Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Species and Habitats 1.14 The UK Biodiversity Action Plan, published in 1994, was the UK Government’s response to signing the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. The new UK post‐2010 Biodiversity Framework replaces the previous UK level Biodiversity Action Plan. Habitats of principal importance 1.15 Fifty‐six habitats of principal importance are included on the S41 list. These are all the habitats in England that were identified as requiring action in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) and continue to be regarded as conservation priorities in the subsequent UK Post‐2010 Biodiversity Framework. They include terrestrial habitats such as upland hay meadows to lowland mixed deciduous woodland, and freshwater and marine habitats such as ponds and subtidal sands and gravels. Species of principal importance 1.16 There are 943 species of principal importance included on the S41 list. These are the species found in England which were identified as requiring action under the UK BAP and which continue to be regarded as conservation priorities under the UK Post‐2010 Biodiversity Framework. In addition, the Hen Harrier has also been included on the list because without continued conservation action it is unlikely that the Hen Harrier population will increase from its current very low levels in England.
Recommended publications
  • Cambridgeshire Tydd St
    C D To Long Sutton To Sutton Bridge 55 Cambridgeshire Tydd St. Mary 24 24 50 50 Foul Anchor 55 Tydd Passenger Transport Map 2011 Tydd St. Giles Gote 24 50 Newton 1 55 1 24 50 To Kings Lynn Fitton End 55 To Kings Lynn 46 Gorefield 24 010 LINCOLNSHIRE 63 308.X1 24 WHF To Holbeach Drove 390 24 390 Leverington WHF See separate map WHF WHF for service detail in this area Throckenholt 24 Wisbech Parson 24 390.WHF Drove 24 46 WHF 24 390 Bellamys Bridge 24 46 Wisbech 3 64 To Terrington 390 24. St. Mary A B Elm Emneth E 390 Murrow 3 24 308 010 60 X1 56 64 7 Friday Bridge 65 Thorney 46 380 308 X1 To Grantham X1 NORFOLK and the North 390 308 Outwell 308 Thorney X1 7 Toll Guyhirn Coldham Upwell For details of bus services To in this area see Peterborough City Council Ring’s End 60 Stamford and 7 publicity or call: 01733 747474 60 2 46 3 64 Leicester Eye www.travelchoice.org 010 2 X1 65 390 56 60.64 3.15.24.31.33.46 To 308 7 380 Three Holes Stamford 203.205.206.390.405 33 46 407.415.701.X1.X4 Chainbridge To Downham Market 33 65 65 181 X4 Peterborough 206 701 24 Lot’s Bridge Wansford 308 350 Coates See separate map Iron Bridge To Leicester for service detail Whittlesey 33 701 in this area X4 Eastrea March Christchurch 65 181 206 701 33 24 15 31 46 Tips End 203 65 F Chesterton Hampton 205 Farcet X4 350 9 405 3 31 35 010 Welney 115 To Elton 24 206 X4 407 56 Kings Lynn 430 415 7 56 Gold Hill Haddon 203.205 X8 X4 350.405 Black Horse 24.181 407.430 Yaxley 3.7.430 Wimblington Boots Drove To Oundle 430 Pondersbridge 206.X4 Morborne Bridge 129 430 56 Doddington Hundred Foot Bank 15 115 203 56 46.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 No. 177 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2008 No. 177 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The South Cambridgeshire (Electoral Changes) Order 2008 Made - - - - 25th January 2008 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) and 1(3) South Cambridgeshire District Council, under section 9(a) of the Local Government and Rating Act 1997(b) (“the 1997 Act”), have made to the Electoral Commission(c) proposals dated October 2007 for electoral changes to two wards of the district of South Cambridgeshire and two electoral divisions of the county of Cambridgeshire: The Electoral Commission have decided to give effect to those proposals and, in relation to the changes made on 1st April 2004 affecting the parishes of Cambourne, Caxton and Knapwell(d), to make related alterations of the boundaries of Bourn, and Papworth and Elsworth wards of the district of South Cambridgeshire, and Bourn, and Papworth and Swavesey electoral divisions of the county of Cambridgeshire: Accordingly, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 14(e) and 23(f) of the 1997 Act, make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the South Cambridgeshire (Electoral Changes) Order 2008. (2) This Order, with the exception of article 4, comes into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to the elections of district councillors for the district wards of Bourn, and Papworth and Elsworth, to be held on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2008, on the day after that on which it is made; (b) for all other purposes, on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Spatial Options for Testing – Methodology
    Greater Cambridge Local Plan Strategic Spatial Options for Testing – Methodology November 2020 Contents 0 Non-technical Summary ...................................................................................... 1 0.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................... 1 0.2 Identifying the reasonable alternatives .......................................................... 1 0.3 Description of strategic spatial options and options numbers for testing ....... 2 0.4 Compiling the strategic spatial options .......................................................... 4 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Purpose ......................................................................................................... 7 1.2. What do we have to do? ............................................................................... 8 1.3. Identifying the reasonable alternatives ........................................................ 11 1.4. Identifying the reasonable spatial strategy options ...................................... 16 2 Strategic Spatial Options for testing .................................................................. 20 2.1. Description of the strategic options ............................................................. 20 2.2. Strategic spatial options numbers for testing .............................................. 30 3 Strategic options methodology .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Knapwell Conservation Area Appraisal 2000
    KNAPWELL CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL This Conservation Area Appraisal for Knapwell was considered in draft form by the Conservation Committee on the 24th May 1999. The Committee approved the document and recommended that it be considered and adopted by the Planning Committee. The appraisal was corrected and revised before being presented to Planning Policy Committee on the 12th July 2000, when Members approved its use as supplementary planning guidance. This decision was ratified at Full Council on 28th September 2000. RF Walker Conservation Manager 29th September 2000 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document is one of a series produced by the District Council which look individually at South Cambridgeshire’s Conservation Areas. 1.2 The purpose of this appraisal is twofold: 1) To act as a guide for development control in the Conservation Area. 2) To identify the features which contribute to the special character of Knapwell and those features which need to be enhanced. 2. WHAT IS A CONSERVATION AREA? 2.1 The statutory definition of a Conservation Area is ‘an area of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance.’ (The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990). 2.2 The District Council has a duty to assess those areas which are considered to fall within the above definition and to designate them as Conservation Areas. There is no standard criteria upon which an area is designated. ‘They may form groups of buildings, open spaces, trees, historic street patterns, village greens or features of historic or archaeological interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Magazine Winter 2018
    Cambs South Magazine www.scambs.gov.uk Winter 2018 Local Plan adopted See pages 7, 8 and 9 Green bin changes See page 26 New Council homes See page 42 A B&BWIN break on the Norfolk coast See page 46 About Your Council | Waste & Recycling | Housing | Community | Planning | Environmental Health | Health & Wellbeing community commercial residential "I cannot speak "The system has performed "Every step of my solar panel highly enough over and above installation was professionally handled without pomp, just of Owen Morgan and his team." what Owen predicted." honest and to the point." —Paul Neal, director of —Harry W., owner of Bar Hill Village Hall, Think AV Studios Ltd, Cambridgeshire Cambridgeshire —Stuart M., Cambridge 12 kWp generating 10 kWp generating 4 kWp generating since 2014 since 2014 since 2011 Looking to reduce your energy bills, invest in your home, and minimise your carbon footprint? We're here to help. Call us anytime on 01223 863 885. since 2009 Cambridge Solar Ltd | Cambridge, CB4 2HY | cambridge-solar.co.uk 2 www.scambs.gov.uk Winter 2018 Contents Hello 4 Contact Us Welcome to the winter edition Planning 7 of South Cambs Magazine community commercial residential 16 Thanks to the hard work of our Finally, with Christmas around the Health & Wellbeing "I cannot speak "The system has performed "Every step of my solar panel planning team, we adopted corner, I’d urge you to think about highly enough over and above installation was professionally Waste & Recycling 24 handled without pomp, just our Local Plan at the end of trying to make it a ‘zero waste’ of Owen Morgan and his team." what Owen predicted." September.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge City Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council
    CAMBRIDGE CITY COUNCIL AND SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL INDOOR SPORTS FACILITY STRATEGY 2015-2031 JUNE 2016 OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE The table below lists the changes applied to the May 2016 version of the Indoor Sports Facility Strategy. Section of the Indoor Changes to the Indoor Sports Facility Strategy (RD/CSF/200) Sports Facility Strategy Whole document Reference to Indoor Facility/Facilities Strategy changed to Indoor Sports Facility Strategy Whole document Acronym IFS (for Indoor Facility/Facilities Strategy) changed to ISFS (for Indoor Sports Facility Strategy) Paragraph 2.11 Delete final sentence of paragraph as no map is provided. South Cambridgeshire District completely encircles Cambridge. South Cambridgeshire District is bordered to the northeast by East Cambridgeshire District, to the southeast by St Edmundsbury District, to the south by Uttlesford District, to the southwest by North Hertfordshire District, to the west by Central Bedfordshire and to the northwest by Huntingdonshire District. The neighbouring counties are shown on Map 2.2 below: Paragraph 5.320 Add additional sentence to the end of paragraph 5.320 to clarify the usage of squash facilities. All the pay and play squash facilities across Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire District are located on education sites; all but Kelsey Kerridge therefore have limited day time access. However, the majority of squash is played in evenings and weekends, so this is less of an issue than it is for sports hall provision. CAMBRIDGE CITY COUNCIL AND SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL INDOOR SPORTS FACILITY STRATEGY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 CAMBRIDGE AND SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT - INDOOR SPORTS FACILITY STRATEGY (ISFS) 3 VISION 3 AIMS 3 NEEDS, PRIORITIES AND OPPORTUNITIES 4 NEW SETTLEMENTS BEYOND 2031 7 RECOMMENDATIONS 13 CAMBRIDGE AND SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL - PLAYING PITCH STRATEGY (PPS) 16 2.
    [Show full text]
  • English Medieval Population: Reconciling Time Series and Cross Sectional Evidence
    ENGLISH MEDIEVAL POPULATION: RECONCILING TIME SERIES AND CROSS SECTIONAL EVIDENCE Stephen Broadberry, London School of Economics, [email protected] Bruce M. S. Campbell, The Queen’s University of Belfast, [email protected] Bas van Leeuwen, University of Warwick, [email protected] 11 October 2011 File: MedievalPopulation8 Abstract: A new time series for English medieval population is constructed from manor-level data using an index-number approach and a regional-weighting scheme. The absolute level of the medieval population is established with a benchmark for 1377, but using the need for consistency with other benchmarks for 1086, 1522 and 1541 as additional constraints. The amount of food required to support the peak medieval population is checked against a reconstruction of English agriculture at that time. Acknowledgements: This paper forms part of the project “Reconstructing the National Income of Britain and Holland, c.1270/1500 to 1850”, funded by the Leverhulme Trust, Reference Number F/00215AR.We are grateful to Alexander Apostolides for valuable research assistance and to Larry Poos for making available his data on tithing-penny payments. 1 I. INTRODUCTION The pioneering work on English medieval population by Russell (1948) established benchmark levels of population for 1086 and 1377 and considered time-series evidence to link these to each other and to estimates for the early-modern period. Russell paid particular attention to the consistency of his estimates over this long sweep of history and arrived at the conclusion that the peak level of medieval population before the Black Death was around 3.7 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Highways Verge Maintenance
    Agenda Item No: 12 Highways Verge Maintenance To: Highways & Transport Committee Meeting Date: 9th March 2021 From: Steve Cox – Executive Director, Place and Economy Electoral division(s): All Forward Plan ref: N/A Key decision: No Outcome: To apprise Members of the new approach to management of highway verges across Cambridgeshire following the launch of updated national guidance Recommendation: Committee is asked to: a) To endorse the approach set out in the report for the management of highway verges across Cambridgeshire. b) To approve inclusion of the county’s verge management approach in future iterations of the Highway Operational Standards. Officer contact: Name: Jonathan Clarke Post: Highways Maintenance Manager Email: [email protected] Tel: 07775674297 Member contacts: Names: Councillors Ian Bates & Mark Howell Post: Chair/Vice-Chair Email: [email protected], [email protected] Tel: 01223 706398 1. Background 1.1 Cambridgeshire County Council has committed to bringing all our biodiversity assets into positive conservation management (Climate Change and Environment Strategy 2020), with the road network identified for better biodiversity management. 1.2 A workshop was held on 12th November 2020 to discuss a revised approach, drawing on expertise from a range of organisations. This included a presentation on verge management in Dorset, an area held up as a leader in this field. Workshop attendees were able to ask questions and seek clarification and guidance from the representatives of the organisations present. The outcome of the workshop has been used to inform the approach set out in this report. 1.3 Attendees at the workshop included: Plantlife, Butterfly Conservation Trust, On the verge, Chair & Vice Chair of the Highways & Transport Committee, County Councillors Harford and Harrison, Skanska Environmental Managers, Skanska Operation Managers, representatives from the County Council Biodiversity team and the County Council Highways Maintenance Manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature in Cambridgeshire NO. 24 1981
    Old milway line, Graham Easy Tnrmpington Nature in Cambridgeshire NO. 24 1981 Published by the Cambridgeshire and Isle of Ely Naturalists' Trust Ltd CAMBRIDGESHIRE AND ISLE OF ELY NATURALISTS' TRUST LIMITED Registered Number: England 202lW Registered Office: 1 Brookside, Cambridge CB2 IJF Telephone: 358144 PATRON: THE LORD WALSTON Secremry/Conservation Oflcec Assistant Secretary: Miss J. Greenall Mrs 3. Morley Field Oflcer: Membership Secretary: J. K. McNaught K. G. Hudson THE COUNCIL 1980-81 President: *Dr S. M. Walters ViccPPrsident: *W. H. Palmer Hon Treasurer *B. S. Routledge Hon Editor: P. H. Oswald, 33 Panton Street, Cambridge CB2 1HL Chairman of the Executive Committee: *Dr M. E. Smith Secretary qfthe Scien@cAdvisory Committee: J. K. McNaught Hon Secretary of the Education Committee: *S. P. Tomkins J. W. Clarke R N. Papworth A. C. Clay tMrs E. W. Parsons *P. J. Conder Dr F. H. Perring *Dr R Connan P.G. Pilbeam P. J. Evans Dr 0. Rackman 3. C. Faulkner DIR E. Randall J. S. L.Gilmour Dr J. Srn~ Dr H. J. Harvey Mm J. M. Tbain B. H. Johnson A. E. Vine P. I. Lake D. A. Wells *MIS M. C. Moore P. While R Page Auditors: Price, Bailey and Partners *Members of the Executive Committee Celebmting the success of the Cambridgeshire Wildlife Appeal at Emmanuel College, Cambridge, on 16 February 1981: (lej? to right) Dr Max Walters, Dr Mike Smith, Mrs Kay Regan DrDerek Brewer, MrDesmond January(seepp. 5 and 5961) Cambridge Evening News Front cover illustration The disused Trumpingron railway line wirh a f0.r Vulpes vulpes and three of the i~~leresringplanrsrhor have occumd rhere - hviaay mullein Verbascum rimaturn, perennialflax Linum anglicum and larkspur ~Giolidaambigua (seepp.
    [Show full text]
  • KNAPWELL VILLAGE and the Parish Church of All Saints
    KNAPWELL VILLAGE And The Parish Church of All Saints A SHORT HISTORY Price 25p In Aid of the Parish Church Restoration Fund Map of parish of Knapwell KNAPWELL VILLAGE AND THE PARISH CHURCH OF ALL SAINTS Set in gently rolling countryside in the west of the county, Knapwell is one of the most unspoilt villages in Cambridgeshire. So little modern development has taken place in the village that the imprint of a thousand years of human habitation is still clearly visible in the landscape. This booklet gives some account of the history of the village and its most interesting local landmarks, in particular the parish church of All Saints. The uplands of West Cambridgeshire were once densely wooded, and as a result there was no settlement in the area in prehistoric times. The Romans built great highways through the forests which are still in use today - the Via Devana (the A604) to the north, the 'Ridgeway' (the A45) to the south, and Ermine Street (the A14) to the west - but they, too, did not settle in the wooded uplands. Two hoards of Roman coins, found in Knapwell in 1840 and 1877 respectively, were probably left by a traveller. The first inhabitants of Knapwell and the neighbouring villages were early Anglo-Saxon settlers who began to clear the woodland for farming purposes. It is significant that the first settlers did not establish their villages along the Roman roads, but rather on the main watercourses which were evidently more useful for transport purposes. The stream which runs alongside Knapwell village, forming the boundary with the adjoining parish of Boxworth, is a small tributary of the River Ouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature in Cambridgeshire No 54 2012
    Nature in Cambridgeshire No 54 2012 Plate 1. Overall design and arrangement of planting types in Madingley 800 Wood. (See article on page 60) Plate 2. : An overview of Madingley 800 Wood in its fifth growing season (2011). (See article on page 60) CONTENTS Potamogeton compressus recolonises Cambridgeshire J.J. Graham & C.D. Preston 3 Marsh Stitchwort on Cambridgeshire’s washlands C. James Cadbury 11 Marsh Harriers breeding near Cambridge – continued Bob Jarman 17 Chinese Water Deer and Muntjac browsing at Woodwalton Fen NNR Arnold Cooke 21 Three annotated copies of Babington’s Flora of Cambridgeshire C.D. Preston 27 The Dingy Skipper on Devil’s Dyke Hilary Conlan 33 Plant species recorded by John Ray in Cambs. C.D. Preston & P.H. Oswald 36 Sulphur Clover; its decline in Cambridgeshire C. James Cadbury 44 Molluscs in the Cambridge Botanic Garden Richard C. Preece & Tom S. White 53 The lichens of Cambridge walls Mark Powell and the Cambridge Lichen Group 56 The Establishment of 800 Wood at Madingley Karen Russell, Rachel Buckingham Howard & Justin Mumford 60 The Backs: CNHS Field Studies area of 2011 Jonathan Shanklin 65 Vascular Plant Records Alan Leslie 71 Bryophyte records T.G.Charman and C.D. Preston 78 Invertebrate Records Louise Bacon 80 OBITUARIES 82 BOOK REVIEWS 84 Weather Summary for 2011 John Kapor 90 Cover Illustration: A Chinese Water Deer in a plot of sallow coppice at Woodwalton Fen National Nature Reserve Nature in Cambridgeshire’s website: www.natureincambridgeshire.org.uk Copies of Nature in Cambridgeshire may be obtained by writing to Nature in Cambridgeshire, c/o Museum of Zoology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ (price £7 plus postage and packing).
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Cambourne.Pdf
    Cambridge Architectural Research Limited LESSONS FROM CAMBOURNE Stephen Platt LESSONS FROM CAMBOURNE 1 Acknowledgements The following people contributed to this study: Mark Deas, InspireEast; Richard Longdin, Master Planner, Randall Thorp Landscape Architects; Gary Young, Master Planner, Terry Farrell & Partners; Julian Tollast, Quintain Estates and Development, formerly Master Planner, Terry Farrell & Partners; David Chare, Project Director (Cambourne), Chare Associates; Kate Wood and Pam Thornton senior planners, Sarah Lyons, Development Officer and Denise Lewis, Head of Housing and Strategic Services, South Cambridgeshire District Council; Peter Studdert, Cambridgeshire Horizons; Brian Human, Cambridge City Council; Julia Gumy, Research Officer, Research Group, Cambridgeshire County Council. David Morgan and Daphne Spink, South Cambridgeshire District Councillors; Ted Pateman former South Cambridgeshire District Councillor; Ruth Poulton, Chairman Cambourne Parish Council; Roger Hume, Cambourne Parish Councillor; John Vickery, Clerk to Cambourne Parish Council. Adrian Davey, Cambridge Housing Society; Fiona Coulson and Kevan Crane, Housing Associations Consortium; Luke Mallett, General Manager, Diverse and Chairman of Institute of Funding Advisers. Debbie Higham, Head of Vine School and Lynne Anderson, Head of Monkfield Park School; Diana Cook, Community Learning, Comberton Village College; Peter Wood, Churches Together in Cambourne; Peter Bailey, Monkfield Medical Practice; Anne Worthington, Cambridgeshire County Council Library Services;
    [Show full text]