2005 Compensation and Entrepreneurship Report in Life Sciences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2005 Compensation and Entrepreneurship Report in Life Sciences www.compstudy.com 2005 Compensation and Entrepreneurship Report in Life Sciences 2005((ABRIDGED VERSION)) A AAA TABLE 1 A OF CONTENTS Letter to the Industry . .3 Summary of Results . .4 Founders . .10 Interviews David Hale . .12 Stelios Papadopoulos . .18 Lita Nelsen . .22 About the Companies . .28 Contained within this document are summary level results of our proprietary study of executive equity and cash compensation. This report provides authoritative pay data for ten senior management positions and is based on data collected from 170 private Information Technology companies. The report also provides a window into compensation for outside Board Members. The results are arranged by financing stage, founder/non-founder status, number of employees, company location and business segment within the Information Technology market. This study was produced by professionals at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, Ernst & Young and J. Robert Scott. We were assisted in our work by academics from the Harvard Business School. You may also access these summary level results from our website at www.compstudy.com for no fee. We appreciate your professional courtesy in providing proper attribution when citing study results. Participants have been provided detailed unabridged data results at no charge. You may secure a copy of the detailed report for $500 plus a commitment to participate in our next survey. Contact Mike DiPierro of J. Robert Scott at 617-563-2770 or [email protected] to obtain the unabridged results. AAA LETTER 3 A TO THE INDUSTRY We are pleased to present the 2005 edition of our annual Compensation and Entrepreneurship Report in Life Sciences. This survey represents our most com- prehensive respondent population to date with data from more than 800 executives and over 170 private companies from across the country in a wide variety of indus- try segments: Pharmaceuticals, Therapeutics, Diagnostics, Devices, BioInformatics, Genomics and Molecular Technologies. This survey was conducted between January and April of 2005. While the broader US economy continues to show signs of sustained recovery, companies and investors struggle to understand the affect on compensation and the ability to attract and retain key executives. Our inspiration for creating this survey of Life Science company executive compensation emerged from a desire to respond to our clients need for tools to assist them in critical decision making for attracting, rewarding and retaining key executives. There is very little compensation data available on private companies. Our survey continues to grow and represents one of the few reliable sources for executive pay information in the industry. The over- all objective has been to provide fundamental information in a useful, analytic framework to evaluate and respond to the compensation dynamics of the senior executive team. Our sample size has substantially increased and our analytical framework has become richer and more nuanced. This year’s presentation is multidimensional. Variables include: financing stage; company size, both in terms of headcount and development stage; founder/non-founder status; industry segment; and geogra- phy. We also wanted to understand the impact on private companies after the new accounting rules that require the expensing of stock options; accordingly, we have added a more granular look at the equity compensation vehicles private companies are using in their compensation packages. This survey has evolved over the years as a result of the input we have received directly from the industry. This year we have correlated executive compensation to company development stage and have provided additional analysis of the data com- pared to financing rounds. Founders are often compensated using different criteria; therefore we have pulled founder compensation data out of the core analy- sis and have included a separate section analyzing founder compensation. Our intention is to continuously improve our data in an effort to more closely serve the needs of the industry and we encourage readers of this publication to submit comments and suggestions to help ensure the changes we make accurately reflect the requirements of the market. Suggestions and comments should be directed to Mike DiPierro of J. Robert Scott, [email protected]. Lastly we’d like to express our gratitude to two individuals who contributed greatly to the 2005 addition: Professor Brian Hall and Associate Professor Noam Wasserman of the Harvard Business School. Additional thanks go to David Hale, President and Chief Executive Officer of CancerVax Corporation, Stelios Papadopoulos, Managing Director at SG Cowen, and Lita Nelsen, Director of the Technology Licensing Office at MIT. Each generously took time out of crowded schedules to provide perspective on this dynamic industry. 4 SUMMARY www.compstudy.com OF B Non- Founder RESULTS KEY: Founder DEMOGRAPHICS OF RESPONDENT Financing Rounds 43 POPULATION 41 41 • The survey was conducted between January and April 2005. Data was collected from more than 800 executives in 172 Life Sciences and Medical Device companies. 22 23 • This report provides an aggregation of the data as well as an examination of the population from a number of different per- spectives, including: financing stage, founder status, geography, headcount, business segment and product life cycle. 2 Financing Rounds 012345+ • For analysis, the population was divided between companies that have raised one or fewer rounds of financing, two or three, and those that have raised four or more rounds of financing. This is a further increase in detail from our previous editions of Founder/Non- 96 this survey. Companies in the earliest stage represent 25% of 89 the population, those with two or three rounds raised represent 78 the largest slice, 49% of the overall companies, and those with 65 four or more rounds raised comprise 26% of the population. 52 Founder Status 40 41 29 • 24% of the executives in the population were founders of their company. This figure was 29% in our 2004 edition of this report. 10 10 8 5 CEOs were most frequently founders of their company with 47% founders, followed by the Head of Platform Technology/CTO at CFO CEO 45% and the CSO at 43%. COO Head of President/ Headcount by Number of Full Time Employees CBO/Head of BD Clinical Research (FTEs) CSO/Head of R&D • 51% of companies surveyed in this report have fewer than 20 FTEs, while 10% were in the largest category, more than 61 FTEs. Headcount by Number of Full Time Employees (FTEs) 88 41 26 17 1-20 21-40 41-60 61+ 2005 Compensation and Entrepreneurship Report in Life Sciences SUMMARY 5 A OF RESULTS Geography Geography 69 • The geographical distribution of the respondents was most con- centrated in California with 40% of the population. The New England and Mid-Atlantic regions were the next largest regions with 21% and 19% each in the respective regions. The South 36 32 was again the smallest category with 5% of the population. 17 Business Segment 10 8 • Distribution between Life Sciences and Medical Device compa- nies was again similar to our 2004 edition; Life Sciences with California New Mid- Midwest West/ South 65% of the companies surveyed and Medical Devices with 35%. England Atlantic Northwest Product Life Cycle • 30% of the companies surveyed in this report currently have a Founder Status product or service on the market. 48 49 42 24 20 16 15 18 4 4 3 2 4 2 CTO Head of Head of Head of Head of Sales (& Marketing) Manufacturing Human Resources Regulatory Affairs Head of Marketing Head of Engineering Business Segment Product Life Cycle 35% Life Sciences 30% At Market 65% Medical Devices 70% Pre-Product/Service 6 SUMMARY www.compstudy.com OF 2003 2004 Bonus B KEY: RESULTS 2003 2004 Base Total Cash Compensation Total Cash Compensation – 2003 and 2004 This data represents 2003 and 2004 compensation for 53 47 non-founding executives. 30 24 30 32 • Overall, total average cash compensation across the survey 31 31 34 27 27 population increased from 2003 to 2004 by 8%, an 8% rise in 26 271 base salary and 3% rise in bonus. 246 226 232 212 189 204 184 187 • No single position saw a decrease in base salary or total cash in 155 168 167 2004. • Base salary increased most dramatically for the Head of Clinical CFO CEO Research, by 13% in 2004. The Head of Marketing also enjoyed a COO double digit increase in base salary of 11% as well as the CEO, Head of President/ Head of Technology and Head of Business Development, 10%. CBO/Head of BD Clinical Research CSO/Head of R&D Bonus as a Percentage of Base Salary • The overall population average bonus as a percentage of base salary remained steady between 2003 and 2004 at 15%. Executives Eligible • The Head of Sales and CEO had the highest bonus as a percent- age of base salary with 24% and 20%, respectively. 81% 83% 75% 74% 68% 68% CFO CEO COO Head of President/ CBO/Head of BD Clinical Research CSO/Head of R&D Bonus as a Percentage of 20% 19% 18% 17% 17% 16% 16% 16% 15% 15% 13% 10% CFO CEO COO Head of President/ CBO/Head of BD Clinical Research CSO/Head of R&D 2005 Compensation and Entrepreneurship Report in Life Sciences SUMMARY 7 A OF RESULTS – 2003 and 2004 43 18 35 13 19 21 23 20 17 18 23 14 17 20 180 178 155 164 154 160 167 161 162 145 132 141 106 115 CTO Head of Head of Head of Head of Sales (& Marketing) Manufacturing Human Resources Regulatory Affairs Head of Marketing Head of Engineering for Bonus 2004 88% 78% 67% 62% 60% 61% 61% CTO Head of Head of Head of Head of Sales (& Marketing) Manufacturing Human Resources Regulatory Affairs Head of Marketing Head of Engineering Base Salary – 2003 and 2004 24% 21% 19% 15% 14% 14% 13% 13% 12% 12% 12% 12% 11% 8% CTO Head of Head of Head of Head of Sales (& Marketing) Manufacturing Human Resources Regulatory Affairs Head of Marketing Head of Engineering 8 SUMMARY www.compstudy.com OF B RESULTS KEY: Median Average Equity Holdings Total Equity Holdings 4.00 4.06 • The non-founding CEO holds an average of 4.06% of their com- pany while the non-founding CSO holds 1.48%, highest among the positions surveyed.
Recommended publications
  • Otonomy Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement
    OTONOMY, INC. Dear Stockholder: I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Otonomy, Inc. (“Otonomy”), which will be held on June 22, 2021 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time. The Annual Meeting will be conducted virtually via live webcast. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/OTIC2021, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote online by entering the control number located on your proxy card. The attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement contain details of the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. Therefore, I urge you to promptly vote and submit your proxy via the Internet, by phone, or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope. If you decide to attend the Annual Meeting, you will be able to change your vote or revoke your proxy, even if you have previously submitted your proxy. On behalf of Otonomy, I would like to thank you for your continued support. Sincerely, David A. Weber, Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer OTONOMY, INC. 4796 Executive Drive San Diego, California 92121 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS Time and Date June 22, 2021 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time The Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders, to be conducted via live webcast.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices and Biologics Regulatory and Policy Bulletin
    Antitrust Connection Spring 2009 To: Our Clients and Friends August 27, 2010 Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices and Biologics Regulatory and Policy Bulletin Top News During China Visit, FDA Commissioner’s Focus Not on Heparin Investigation FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg’s recent trip to China focused primarily on avenues of collaboration and cooperation between the FDA and Chinese regulators rather than on the current investigation into the contamination of heparin, which has caused some to express concern that US legislators may perceive the two bodies as not trying to work effectively to determine the cause of the contamination. FDA officials have indicated that the issue was discussed, but it was not focused on during the meetings. Industry Expresses Concern Over New Drug User Fees The drug industry is expressing concern over the FDA’s recent increase in prescription drug user fee rates, saying that the increase of approximately 10 percent is not appropriate given the backlog and failure to meet other review deadlines. Industry has indicated that it would like more accountability and adherence to performance goals if will be paying such increased fees. As the FDA discusses drug user fees and other programs as part of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act legislative proposal, some consumer, safety, and patient groups are voicing their concern that the agency is not including them in its discussions of the Act. Official, Panel Members Criticize Glaxo’s Report on Avandia Committee Meeting An article in the New York Times indicates that a government official and some members of the FDA advisory panel that recently reviewed Avandia are critical of Glaxo’s letter to doctors participating in the TIDE trial, intended to compare the risks of Avandia with those of competing drug Actos.
    [Show full text]
  • 204200Orig1s000 204200Orig2s000
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 204200Orig1s000 204200Orig2s000 MEDICAL REVIEW(S) CLINICAL REVIEW Application Type NDA Application Number(s) 204-200 and 204-640 Priority or Standard Standard Submit Date(s) March 7, 2012 Received Date(s) March 7, 2012 PDUFA Goal Date January 7, 2013 Division / Office DPARP/OND Reviewer Name(s) Peter Starke, MD Review Completion Date October 29, 2012 Established Name Epinephrine injection, USP, 1mg/mL (Proposed) Trade Name Adrenalin® Therapeutic Class Catecholamine Applicant JHP Pharmaceuticals, LLC Formulation(s) Solution for injection Proposed Dosing Hypersensitivity reactions: IM or SC Regimen injection(b) (4) [Ophthalmic use: Topical irrigation or intraocular bolus injection] Proposed Indication(s) Hypersensitivity reactions: severe acute anaphylactic reactions, (b) (4) [Ophthalmic use: induction and maintenance of mydriasis during cataract surgery] Intended Population(s) Hypersensitivity reactions: No age restrictions [Ophthalmic use: No age restrictions] Reference ID: 3209828 Clinical Review ● Peter Starke, MD NDA 204-200 ● Adrenalin® (epinephrine) MEDICAL OFFICER REVIEW Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Rheumatology Products (DPARP) SUBMISSIONS REVIEWED IN THIS DOCUMENT Document Date CDER Stamp Date Submission Comments March 7, 2012 March 7, 2012 SD-1, eCTD-0000 New NDA submission April 9, 2012 April 9, 2012 SD-2, eCTD-0001 PREA waiver request – Anaphylaxis April 9, 2012 April 9, 2012 SD-3, eCTD-0002 PREA waiver request – Mydriasis April 18, 2012 April 18, 2012 SD-4, eCTD-0003 Request for proprietary name review Sept 5, 2012 Sept 6, 2012 SD-22, eCTD-0021 Draft Ophthalmic Labeling Oct 22, 2012 Oct 22, 2012 SD-27, eCDT-0026 Certification that EpiPen is the reference for the 505(b)(2) application RECOMMENDED REGULATORY ACTION NDA/SUPPLEMENTS: X APPROVAL COMPLETE RESPONSE OTHER ACTION: 2 Reference ID: 3209828 Clinical Review ● Peter Starke, MD NDA 204-200 ● Adrenalin® (epinephrine) Table of Contents 1 RECOMMENDATIONS/RISK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ Check the appropriate box: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☒ Definitive Proxy Statement ☐ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ☒ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: 100 Campus Drive, Suite 102 Florham Park, NJ 07932 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT Dear Stockholder: The annual meeting of stockholders of Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 3:17-Cv-05244 Document 1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 100
    Case 3:17-cv-05244 Document 1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 AMBER RAINEY, CHRISTINA KOLLMEYER, and LISA VOGEL, 10 No. Plaintiffs, 11 COMPLAINT v. 12 MYLAN SPECIALTY, L.P., a Delaware 13 limited partnership, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COMPLAINT Case No. 1918 EIGHTH AVENUE, SUITE 3300 • SEATTLE, WA 98101 (206) 623-7292 • FAX (206) 623-0594 010648.11 949197 V1 Case 3:17-cv-05244 Document 1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 2 of 100 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 4 II. PARTIES .............................................................................................................................7 5 A. Plaintiffs ...................................................................................................................7 6 B. Defendant .................................................................................................................8 7 III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ..........................................................................................8 8 IV. DRUG PRICING IN THE UNITED STATES ....................................................................9 9 A. The Entities Involved in Drug Pricing .....................................................................9 10 B. Different Prices for Different Players ....................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • 204640Orig1s000
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 204640Orig1s000 MEDICAL REVIEW(S) ADDENDUM TO MEDICAL OFFICER REVIEW Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Rheumatology Products (HFD-570) APPLICATION: NDA 204640 TRADE NAME: Adrenalin 30 mL vials APPLICANT/SPONSOR: JHP Pharmaceuticals, LLC USAN NAME: Epinephrine injection solution, USP, MEDICAL OFFICER: Peter Starke, MD 1 mg/mL (1:1000), 30 mL vials TEAM LEADER: Janet Maynard, MD CATEGORY: Non-selective alpha and beta adrenergic agonist (catecholamine) DATE: December 12, 2013 ROUTE: SC or IM SUBMISSIONS REVIEWED IN THIS DOCUMENT Document Date CDER Stamp Date Submission Comments Sept. 14, 2012 Sept. 14, 2012 N-000, SD-1 Original NDA submission for NDA 204-640, split from NDA 204-200 August 2, 2013 August 2, 2013 SD-2 PDUFA fee paid, NDA 204-640 reopened November 25, 2013 November 25, 2013 Medical Officer review of NDA 204640 REVIEW SUMMARY: This is an addendum to my clinical review dated November 25, 2013, for a 505(b)(2) application submitted by JHP Pharmaceuticals for the use of the currently marketed but unapproved 30 mL multiple- dose vial presentation of Adrenalin® (epinephrine injection, USP), 1mg/mL (1:1000), for the emergency treatment of allergic reactions (Type 1), including anaphylaxis [‘anaphylaxis’]. This application relies on the Agency’s previous findings of efficacy and safety for EpiPen for the treatment of anaphylaxis, and also cross-references to the approved 1 mL single-use vial Adrenalin product, which was approved on December 7, 2012. My original review noted the presence of chlorobutanol in the 30 mL vial presentation (which is not in the 1 mL vial presentation), stating that it does not affect the risk/benefit assessment for this presentation for indication of anaphylaxis, which remains favorable.
    [Show full text]
  • Zogenix, Inc. (Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A (Rule 14a-101) SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Filed by the Registrant x Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨ Check the appropriate box: x Preliminary Proxy Statement ¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ¨ Definitive Proxy Statement ¨ Definitive Additional Materials ¨ Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 Zogenix, Inc. (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other Than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): x No fee required. ¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: Table of Contents 12400 High Bluff Drive, Suite 650 San Diego, California 92130 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT Dear Stockholder: The annual meeting of stockholders of Zogenix, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ) Symbol : LGND
    Company Information Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ) Symbol : LGND Sector: Healthcare Headquarters 10275 Science Center Drive, San Diego, California 92121-1117 TelePhone 858-550-7500 www.ligand.com Fiscal Year Ends December Selected Financial Data Close ( 07/23/2008) 3.4M Volume (07/23/2008) 250M Weekly High 3.52$ Weekly Low 3.2$ Weekly Close 3.4$ Shares Outstanding 95M Market Cap $323M Cash On Hand $90M Years In Cash Profitable Technology Value $232M Business Summary Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc is a biotech company focused on the discovery and development of new medical treatments. The company was founded in 1987 and aims to solve unmet medical needs in a number of therapeutic areas, including: Thrombocytopenia, Hepatitis C, Cancer, Hormone-related diseases, Osteoporosis, and Inflammatory diseases. Ligand's Intracellular receptor (IR) technology is the result of its ground-breaking work in the field of gene transcription. The company's Intracellular receptor (IR) technology applies the most advanced cell-based assay and gene-expression tools to discover new and important medicines. It has concentrated its research efforts on the development of drug candidates from its Thrombopoietin (TPO) program; expanding the therapeutic potential of Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor 1 LSA. © Life Science Analytics, Inc. 2008 This report was created on 07/26/2008 Modulators (SGRM) and Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARM); advancing the understanding of the activities of hormones and hormone-related drugs; and Making scientific discoveries
    [Show full text]
  • 2007English.87123248
    ASTRAZENECA CONTACT ANNUAL REPORT AND INFORMATION FORM 20-F INFORMATION 2007 REGISTERED OFFICE INVESTOR RELATIONS REGISTRAR AND US DEPOSITARY AND CORPORATE CONTACTS TRANSFER OFFICE JPMorgan Chase Bank HEADQUARTERS ADDRESS UK: as above or e-mail Equiniti Limited JPMorgan Service Center AstraZeneca PLC [email protected] Aspect House PO Box 3408 15 Stanhope Gate Sweden: Spencer Road South Hackensack London W1K 1LN AstraZeneca AB Lancing NJ 07606-3408 UK SE-151 85 Södertälje West Sussex US Tel: +44 (0)20 7304 5000 Sweden BN99 6DA Tel (toll free in the US): Fax: +44 (0)20 7304 5151 Tel: +46 (0)8 553 260 00 UK 888 697 8018 Fax: +46 (0)8 553 290 00 Tel (freephone in the UK): Tel (outside the US): or e-mail 0800 389 1580 +1 (201) 680 6630 [email protected] Tel (outside the UK): US: +44 (0)121 415 7033 Investor Relations AstraZeneca SWEDISH SECURITIES ASTRAZENECA.COM Pharmaceuticals LP REGISTRATION CENTRE 1800 Concord Pike VPC AB PO Box 15437 PO Box 7822 Wilmington SE-103 97 Stockholm DE 19850-5437 Sweden US Tel: +46 (0)8 402 9000 Tel: +1 (302) 886 3000 Fax: +1 (302) 886 2972 2007 AND FORM 20-F INFORMATION ANNUAL REPORT ASTRAZENECA This Annual Report and Form 20-F Information is also available online at astrazeneca.com/ annualreport2007 INTRODUCTION 01 > International accounting transition 92 26 Employee costs and share option plans for employees 153 AstraZeneca and our year in brief 01 > New accounting standards 92 > Sarbanes-Oxley Act section 404 92 27 Commitments and Financial highlights 02 contingent liabilities 158 > Results of operations
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ Check the appropriate box: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☒ Definitive Proxy Statement ☐ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ☒ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: 100 Campus Drive, Suite 102 Florham Park, NJ 07932 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT Dear Stockholder: The annual meeting of stockholders of Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Stacy Hall [email protected] 949-322-7195 5850 Granby St, Worthington, OH 43085
    Stacy Hall [email protected] 949-322-7195 5850 Granby St, Worthington, OH 43085 Senior-level pharmaceutical and healthcare creative with experience in multiple therapeutic categories and a solid background in copy, art direction, and staff management September 2015—Present Vice President, Creative Director Navicor Group, a Syneos Health company, Columbus OH Therapeutic focus: hematology/oncology, analgesics, hemostatics, anemia, amyloidosis — Build/manage dedicated creative teams — Develop short- and long-term strategies to achieve client and brand goals — Provide copy and creative direction for multichannel tactics — Estimate project timelines and budgets, identify resources and manage freelancers Clients Daiichi Sankyo (quizartinib, Turalio) Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (Ofirmev, Hemostat Solutions, Health Systems Group) Amag Pharmaceuticals (Feraheme) Prothena Corp. (investigational product) January 2007—July 2015 Vice President, Group Creative Director Giant Creative | Strategy, San Francisco CA Therapeutic focus: dermatology, cardiology, enzyme replacement therapy, oncology, respiratory — Content management and creative direction for print and digital media — Management of project timelines, budgets, copy staff, freelancers — Execution of competitive intelligence and market landscape reviews Clients Actelion Pharmaceuticals (Tracleer, Veletri) Amgen (Neulasta, Neupogen) BioMarin Pharmaceutical (Naglazyme, Kuvan) Boston Scientific (Bronchial Thermoplasty) Conor Medsystems (stent franchise) Genentech (Esbriet) Neutrogena (OTC; professional
    [Show full text]
  • Listing of Global Companies with Ongoing Government Activity
    COMPANY LINE OF BUSINESS TICKER V & P LABORATORY CO. LTD. PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V & P SCIENTIFIC, INC PLASTICS PRODUCTS, NEC, NSK V B JEWELLERS PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V C A LABORATORIOS S.R.L. BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS, EXCEPT DIAGNOSTIC V D SANE AYURVEDIC RESEARCH CENTRE MEDICINALS AND BOTANICALS, NSK V H B LIFE SCIENCES LIMITED PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V H B LIFESCIENCE INCORPORATED PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V I G BIOTEC PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V I P PHARMACEUTICALS (INDIA) MEDICINALS AND BOTANICALS, NSK V J AYURVEDICS MEDICINALS AND BOTANICALS, NSK V K AYURVEDIC STORE MEDICINALS AND BOTANICALS, NSK V K HIMALYAN HERBAL MEDICINALS AND BOTANICALS, NSK V K S M HERBAL PRODUCTS MEDICINALS AND BOTANICALS, NSK V M COSTA SANTOS PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V N POLYMERS PRIVATE LIMITED PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V P PHARMA PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V R HERBAL REMEDIES PRIVATE LIMITED MEDICINALS AND BOTANICALS, NSK V R HERBALS MEDICINALS AND BOTANICALS, NSK V R PHARMACEUTICALS PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V S BIDPHARMA RESEARCH & PROCESSING PRIVATE LIMITED MEDICINALS AND BOTANICALS, NSK V S D LIFE SCIENCES PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V S INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED MEDICINALS AND BOTANICALS, NSK V S P INTERNATIONAL PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V V R ORGANICS PRIVATE LIMITED PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V V S CHEMICALS PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V V S PHARMACEUTICALS & CHEMICALS PRIVATE LIMITED PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V&S PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED MEDICINALS AND BOTANICALS, NSK V. K. AYURVEDIC AGENCIES MEDICINALS AND BOTANICALS, NSK V.P.H. OOO PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V.P.PHARMACY REGISTERED ORDINARY PARTNERSHIP PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V.R. LIFE SCIENCES PVT. LTD. PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V.R. LIFE SCIENCES PVT. LTD. PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V.S. PHARMA CO.,LTD. PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS V.S.M.
    [Show full text]