DOCSLIB.ORG

Acetabular Dysplasia in the Reduced Or Subluxated Hip

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acetabular Dysplasia in the Reduced Or Subluxated Hip 1 Acetabular Dysplasia 5 2 in the Reduced or Subluxated Hip 3 Jonathan G. Schoenecker, Ira Zaltz, Justin Roth, 4 and Perry L. Schoenecker 5 Introduction include: dysplasia, impingement and avascular 26 necrosis. The purpose of this chapter is to review 27 6 As first proposed by Dr. William Harris in the the pathologic processes of acetabular and proxi- 28 7 early 1980s, it has become clear that osteoarthri- mal femoral development that lead to acetabular 29 8 tis (OA) of the hip does not exist as a primary dysplasia in a located, or subluxated, hip. 30 9AU2 disease, or if it does, it is extraordinarily rare [1]. Emphasis will be placed upon understanding 31 10 The extensive experience in total hip replacement how the developmental milestones of the acetab- 32 11 surgeries over the last four decades have provided ulum influence the surgeon’s decision to operate, 33 12 extensive insight into the pathological hip joint and if so, whether to perform an acetabuloplasty, 34 13 processes that lead to hip OA [2]. In particular, redirectional, salvage or replacement procedure. 35 14 mechanical pathologies that cause damage to “Mechanical pathologies that cause dam- 36 15 either the labrum or the chondrolabral junction age to either the labrum or the chondro- 37 16 are often the initiating processes which instigate labral junction are often the initiating 38 17 acetabular and femoral head arthritis (Fig. 5.1) processes which instigate acetabular and 39 18 [3]. These key observations have stimulated the femoral head arthritis” 40 19 field of hip preservation, which focuses on deter- 20 mining the mechanisms that cause damage to 21 these structures and the development of surgical Pathophysiology 41 22 approaches that comprehensively correct these 23 pathomorphologies [4–8]. The three pathological Normal anatomical development of the hip 42 24 processes that lead to injury and degeneration of requires coordinated growth of both the acetab- 43 25 the labrum and the chondrolabral junction [1, 2] ulum and proximal femur that provides essential 44 femoral head coverage and clinical stability by 45 J. G. Schoenecker (*) the time the child is skeletally mature [9]. 46 AU1 Department of Orthopaedics, Vanderbilt University Normal acetabular development results in a con- 47 Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA gruent hip joint with approximately 15° of ace- 48 e-mail: [email protected] tabular anteversion and sufficient coverage of 49 I. Zaltz the femoral head. At skeletal maturity, an intact 50 William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA hip joint is stable during weight bearing and 51 J. Roth · P. L. Schoenecker physiologic range of motion, without inappro- 52 Department of Orthopaedics, Washington University priate stresses on the chondrolabral junction. 53 Medical Center, St. Louis, MO, USA e-mail: [email protected]; Normal proximal femoral development results 54 [email protected] in a spherical ­femoral head with approximately 55 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 S. Alshryda et al. (eds.), The Pediatric and Adolescent Hip, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12003-0_5 J. G. Schoenecker et al. a bc d Fig. 5.1 Prevailing theory of osteoarthritis of the hip. Years of improper loading of the hip results in tearing of Mechanical pathology leads to labral pathology and hip the labrum or the chondrolabral junction (yellow arrow). osteoarthritis. (a) Radiographs of a mildly dysplastic hip (d) Progression of the tear, or increased pathologic load- in 34-year old female with right hip pain (white arrow rep- ing leads to arthritis of the femoral head or the acetabulum resents position of patient chondrolabral junction). (b, c) (red arrow) 56 15° of femoral version and the tip of the greater motion and pain [10]. During ambulation, hip 87 57 trochanter at the level of the center of the femo- dysplasia may result in excessive stress on the 88 58 ral head. This normal hip development allows labrum and/or chondrolabral junction (Fig. 5.2), 89 59 for joint congruency during physiologic activi- abnormal abductor muscle tension (with gait dis- 90 60 ties, with physiologic motion of 90° of flexion, turbance), and malalignment of the limb leading 91 61 15° of internal rotation at 90° of flexion and a to distal joint pathologies. With these in mind, 92 62 90° arc of rotation with equal internal/external surgical approaches have been designed to pre- 93 63 rotation (45°) in the prone position. Proper fem- serve the hip joint, addressing the pathological 94 64 oral neck offset and alignment of the greater and mechanical problems presented by these pro- 95 65 lesser trochanters assures both normal muscle cesses. The goals of hip joint preservation sur- 96 66 tension and force vectors for hip rotation while gery is to restore stable acetabular coverage of 97 67 avoiding extracapsular impingement on the pel- the femoral head and achieve a near normal range 98 68 vis during physiologic joint motion. Adequate of motion, without femoral acetabular/pelvic 99 69 acetabular coverage, proper acetabular and impingement. Proximal femoral dysplasia may 100 70 proximal femoral version and 15° of external occur from primary developmental pathologies, 101 71 tibial torsion, results in a stable base to support such as proximal femoral focal deficiency, coxa 102 72 the torso over the limb with a foot-forward gait valga/vara or excessive version. It can also 103 73 during single leg stance. develop secondarily, from diseases such as Legg-­ 104 74 Hip dysplasia with a located, or subluxed, Calve-­Perthes disease, slipped capital femoral 105 75 femoroacetabular joint is associated with inap- epiphysis or avascular necrosis. These conditions 106 76 propriate development of either the acetabulum, are presented in detail in other chapters. 107 77 proximal femur or both. Either alone or in combi- Acetabular dysplasia may occur primarily from 108 78 nations, the resulting pathomorphologies cause failure of development or secondarily from 109 79 damage to the labrum/chondrolabral junction and improper loading by the proximal femur. The 110 80 articular cartilage, leading to premature degener- morphologic characteristics are dependent upon 111 81 ation of the hip joint [4–8]. Acetabular under-­ the stage of acetabular development at the time of 112 82 coverage of the femoral head produces instability insult. 113 83 of the femoroacetabular joint. In addition to dam- Acetabular development (Fig. 5.3) is a 114 84 aging intracapsular structures of the hip, intra- dynamic process of endochondral ossification 115 85 capsular/extracapsular impingement of the femur involving the cartilaginous anlage that includes 116 86 on the acetabulum or pelvis causes restricted two essential growth centers: the triradiate 117 5 Acetabular Dysplasia in the Reduced or Subluxated Hip ab cd Fig. 5.2 Micro-instability of the dysplastic hip damages micro-instability of the femoroacetabular joint during the chondrolabral junction. Hip dysplasia with a located, daily activities. (c) This instability ultimately leads to or subluxed, femoroacetabular joint refers to inappropri- damage of the (c) labrum/chondrolabral junction (red ate development of either the acetabulum, proximal femur arrow) or even (d) fracture of the acetabular epiphysis (red and or both. (a) Angle arrows represent insufficient lateral arrow). Ultimately, this damage leads to premature degen- center edge angle (LCEA) of the ossifying acetabular eration of the hip joint epiphysis. (b) The resulting pathomorphologies leads to 118 cartilage and the acetabular epiphysis (os acetab- response to the increased size of the femoral 148 AU3119 uli) [11–13]. During the first 4 years of life the epiphysis [12, 13]. 149 120 ­majority of acetabular development occurs via Acetabular dysplasia can therefore be broken 150 121 biomechanical molding, with sequential ossifica- down to three categories: (1) improper shape and/ 151 122 tion of the acetabular cartilaginous anlage and or delay in ossification of the cartilaginous anlage, 152 123 radial growth of the acetabulum (by the triradiate (2) damage to the triradiate cartilage, or (3) prob- 153 124 cartilage). The shape of the acetabular cartilagi- lems of shape and/or delayed ossification of the 154 125 nous anlage is primarily influenced through acetabular epiphysis. Problems of shape and/or 155 126 direct contact (articulation) with the femoral delay in ossification of the cartilaginous anlage 156 127 head. The femoral head must be stably reduced in occur early in life. As the cartilaginous anlage is 157 128 the true acetabulum for optimal acetabular growth considerably plastic, malformation most com- 158 129 and development. The cartilaginous anlage is monly occurs as a result of eccentric loading of the 159 130 considerably plastic during the cartilaginous proximal femur. This results in an altered hip cen- 160 131 phase and becomes much less plastic later on, ter which is typically superiorly migrated, 161 132 following vascular invasion and subsequent ossi- observed as a “break in Shelton’s line” on a weight 162 133 fication. The triradiate cartilage is responsible for bearing AP pelvis with femoral version neutral- 163 134 growth of acetabular width, which must match ized (Fig. 5.4). Severe subluxation may cause 164 135 the growth of the femoral epiphysis. In a normal more significant morphologic changes to the carti- 165 136 hip, the majority of the cartilaginous anlage has laginous anlage and resemble a dislocated hip on 166 137 ossified by 4 years of age [12, 13]. After 4 years radiographs. Additionally, inappropriate biome- 167 138 of age, triradiate cartilage growth continues to chanical loading may also delay the vascular inva- 168 139 widen the developing acetabulum to accommo- sion and ossification of the cartilaginous anlage 169 140 date a larger proximal femoral epiphysis [12, 13]. which is observed as an abnormal acetabular index 170 141 Triradiate cartilage growth is typically complete (AI) (Fig. 5.5).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment Using 'Iliac Pillar' Screw for Isolated
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (2019) 45:213–219 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-1046-0 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Minimally invasive surgical treatment using ‘iliac pillar’ screw for isolated iliac wing fractures in geriatric patients: a new challenge Weon‑Yoo Kim1,2 · Se‑Won Lee1,3 · Ki‑Won Kim1,3 · Soon‑Yong Kwon1,4 · Yeon‑Ho Choi5 Received: 1 May 2018 / Accepted: 29 October 2018 / Published online: 1 November 2018 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Purpose There have been no prior case series of isolated iliac wing fracture (IIWF) due to low-energy trauma in geriatric patients in the literature. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of IIWF in geriatric patients, and to pre- sent a case series of IIWF in geriatric patients who underwent our minimally invasive screw fixation technique named ‘iliac pillar screw fixation’. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed six geriatric patients over 65 years old who had isolated iliac wing fracture treated with minimally invasive screw fixation technique between January 2006 and April 2016. Results Six geriatric patients received iliac pillar screw fixation for acute IIWFs. The incidence of IIWFs was approximately 3.5% of geriatric patients with any pelvic bone fractures. The main fracture line exists in common; it extends from a point between the anterosuperior iliac spine and the anteroinferior iliac spine to a point located at the dorsal 1/3 of the iliac crest whether fracture was comminuted or not. Regarding the Koval walking ability, patients who underwent iliac pillar screw fixation technique tended to regain their pre-injury walking including one patient in a previously bedridden state.
    [Show full text]
  • Turnedhead Adductedhip Truncal Curvature Syndrome
    Archives ofDisease in Childhood 1994; 70: 515-519 515 Turned head adducted hip truncal curvature syndrome Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.70.6.515 on 1 June 1994. Downloaded from Chiaki Hamanishi, Seisuke Tanaka Abstract curvature. An epidemiological analysis was One hundred and eight neonates and carried out to determine whether the intra- infants who showed the clinical triad of a uterine environment of these asymmetrically head turned to one side, adduction con- deformed babies had been restricted. The tracture of the hip joint on the occipital clinical course of each feature of the clinical side of the turned head, and truncal cur- triad was also analysed to determine whether vature, which we named TAC syndrome, TAC syndrome is aetiologically related to any were studied. These cases included seven subsequent paediatric disorders. with congenital and five with late infantile dislocations of the hip joint and 14 who developed muscular torticollis. Forty one Patients and methods were among 7103 neonates examined by We studied a total of 108 cases with TAC one of the authors. An epidemiological syndrome. Of them, 41 were among a total analysis confirmed the aetiology of the number of 7103 neonates personally examined syndrome to be environmental. The side by one of the authors (CH) at newborn exami- to which the head was turned and that of nations conducted at hospitals in four cities the adducted hip contracture showed a since 1981. Thirteen were referred neonates. high correlation with the side of the The remaining 54 were among infants aged maternal spine on which the fetus had from 10 days to 3 months who were referred to been lying.
    [Show full text]
  • Genu Varum and Genu Valgum Genu Varum and Genu Valgum
    Common Pediatric Lower Limb Disorders Dr.Kholoud Al-Zain Assistant Professor Consultant, Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon Nov- 2018 Acknowledgement: Dr.Abdalmonem Alsiddiky Dr.Khalid Bakarman Prof. M. Zamzam Topics to Cover 1. In-toeing 2. Genu (varus & valgus), & proximal tibia vara 3. Club foot 4. L.L deformities in C.P patients 5. Limping & leg length inequality 6. Leg aches 1) Intoeing Intoeing- Evaluation • Detailed history – Onset, who noticed it, progression – Fall a lot – How sits on the ground • Screening examination (head to toe) • Pathology at the level of: – Femoral anteversion – Tibial torsion – Forefoot adduction – Wandering big toe Intoeing- Asses rotational profile Pathology Level Special Test • Femoral anteversion • Hips rotational profile: – Supine – Prone • Tibial torsion • Inter-malleolus axis: – Supine – Prone • Foot thigh axis • Forefoot adduction • Heel bisector line • Wandering big toe Intoeing- Special Test Foot Propagation Angle → normal is (-10°) to (+15°) Intoeing- Femoral Anteversion Hips rotational profile, supine → IR/ER normal = 40-45/45-50° Intoeing- Tibial Torsion Inter-malleolus axis Supine position Sitting position Intoeing- Tibial Torsion Foot Thigh Axis → normal (0°) to (-10°) Intoeing- Forefoot Adduction Heel bisector line → normal along 2 toe Intoeing- Adducted Big Toe Intoeing- Treatment • Establish correct diagnosis • Parents education • Annual clinic F/U → asses degree of deformity • Femoral anti-version → sit cross legged • Tibial torsion → spontaneous improvement • Forefoot adduction → anti-version
    [Show full text]
  • Canine Hip Dysplasia - by Patricia Long October, 2001
    Canine Hip Dysplasia - by Patricia Long October, 2001 Edited by Melissa Zebley, DVM Contributions by: Sue Bacig, Brenda Briggs, Sue Brightman, Cathy Burlile, Janice Cagwin, Steve Dudley, Lisa Ebnet, Sue German, Kathy Maher, Ruth Reynolds, Rose Tierney, Sue Sanvido, Doug Smith Much has been written on hip dysplasia (HD), and this article is simply an attempt to summarize much of that information. For a more in-depth examination of HD, I urge you to read the articles by Susan Thorpe-Vargas and John Cargill which can be found on http://workingdogs.com/ Prevention - the ounce worth more than a pound Breeders have several methods of trying to minimize the risk of HD: OFA, GDC, PennHIP. But these registries are only able to identify some dogs that may have HD. They are not able to identify the dogs that carry the genes for HD. It is important to understand that no matter how many generations there are in the pedigree with hips rated clear, all this can do is to minimize the risk of HD - it can't eliminate it. HD is a polygenetic multifactorial condition, which means that we still don't know exactly what causes it. But without the genes for it, a dog won't get it without some other event such as an injury. What is HD? The hip joint is a clever device, the classic ball and socket joint. Properly constructed, the top of the thigh bone, or femoral head, is the ball that fits into the socket, or acetabulum, in the pelvis. But in dogs, as in humans, this joint does not always develop properly.
    [Show full text]
  • Pelvic Anatomyanatomy
    PelvicPelvic AnatomyAnatomy RobertRobert E.E. Gutman,Gutman, MDMD ObjectivesObjectives UnderstandUnderstand pelvicpelvic anatomyanatomy Organs and structures of the female pelvis Vascular Supply Neurologic supply Pelvic and retroperitoneal contents and spaces Bony structures Connective tissue (fascia, ligaments) Pelvic floor and abdominal musculature DescribeDescribe functionalfunctional anatomyanatomy andand relevantrelevant pathophysiologypathophysiology Pelvic support Urinary continence Fecal continence AbdominalAbdominal WallWall RectusRectus FasciaFascia LayersLayers WhatWhat areare thethe layerslayers ofof thethe rectusrectus fasciafascia AboveAbove thethe arcuatearcuate line?line? BelowBelow thethe arcuatearcuate line?line? MedianMedial umbilicalumbilical fold Lateralligaments umbilical & folds folds BonyBony AnatomyAnatomy andand LigamentsLigaments BonyBony PelvisPelvis TheThe bonybony pelvispelvis isis comprisedcomprised ofof 22 innominateinnominate bones,bones, thethe sacrum,sacrum, andand thethe coccyx.coccyx. WhatWhat 33 piecespieces fusefuse toto makemake thethe InnominateInnominate bone?bone? PubisPubis IschiumIschium IliumIlium ClinicalClinical PelvimetryPelvimetry WhichWhich measurementsmeasurements thatthat cancan bebe mademade onon exam?exam? InletInlet DiagonalDiagonal ConjugateConjugate MidplaneMidplane InterspinousInterspinous diameterdiameter OutletOutlet TransverseTransverse diameterdiameter ((intertuberousintertuberous)) andand APAP diameterdiameter ((symphysissymphysis toto coccyx)coccyx)
    [Show full text]
  • Gluteal Region-II
    Gluteal Region-II Dr Garima Sehgal Associate Professor King George’s Medical University UP, Lucknow Structures in the Gluteal region • Bones & joints • Ligaments Thickest muscle • Muscles • Vessels • Nerves Thickest nerve • Bursae Learning Objectives By the end of this teaching session Gluteal region –II all the MBBS 1st year students must be able to: • Enumerate the nerves of gluteal region • Write a short note on nerves of gluteal region • Describe the location & relations of sciatic nerve in gluteal region • Enumerate the arteries of gluteal region • Write a short note on arteries of gluteal region • Enumerate the arteries taking part in trochanteric and cruciate anastomosis • Write a short note on trochanteric and cruciate anastomosis • Enumerate the structures passing through greater sciatic foramen • Enumerate the structures passing through lesser sciatic foramen • Enumerate the bursae in relation to gluteus maximus • Enumerate the structures deep to gluteus maximus • Discuss applied anatomy Nerves of Gluteal region (all nerves in gluteal region are branches of sacral plexus) Superior gluteal nerve (L4,L5, S1) Inferior gluteal nerve (L5, S1, S2) FROM DORSAL DIVISIONS Perforating cutaneous nerve (S2,S3) Nerve to quadratus femoris (L4,L5, S1) Nerve to obturator internus (L5, S1, S2) FROM VENTRAL DIVISIONS Pudendal nerve (S2,S3,S4) Sciatic nerve (L4,L5,S1,S2,S3) Posterior cutaneous nerve of thigh FROM BOTH DORSAL &VENTRAL (S1,S2) & (S2,S3) DIVISIONS 1. Superior Gluteal nerve (L4,L5,S1- dorsal division) 1 • Enters through the greater 3 sciatic foramen • Above piriformis 2 • Runs forwards between gluteus medius & gluteus minimus • SUPPLIES: 1. Gluteus medius 2. Gluteus minimus 3. Tensor fasciae latae 2.
    [Show full text]
  • British Veterinary Association / Kennel Club Hip Dysplasia Scheme
    British Veterinary Association / Kennel Club Hip Dysplasia Scheme Breed Specific Statistics – 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2016 Hip scores should be considered along with other criteria as part of a responsible breeding programme, and it is recommended that breeders choose breeding stock with hip scores around and ideally below the breed median score, depending on the level of HD in the breed. HD status of parents, siblings and progeny for Kennel Club registered dogs should also be considered, and these together with a three generation Health Test Pedigree may be downloaded via the Health Test Results Finder, available on the Kennel Club’s online health tool Mate Select (www.mateselect.org.uk). In addition, estimated breeding values (EBVs) are available for breeds in which a significant number of dogs have been graded, via the same link. For further advice on the interpretation and use of hip scores see www.bva.co.uk/chs The breed median score is the score of the ‘average’ dog in that breed (i.e. an equal number of dogs in that breed have better and worse scores). No. 15 year No. 15 year 5 year 5 year Breed score in Breed score in Range Median Median Range Median Median 15 years 15 years Affenpinscher 40 8 – 90 13 14 Beagle 62 8 - 71 16 17 Afghan Hound 18 0 – 73 8.5 27 Bearded Collie 1511 0 – 70 9 9 Airedale Terrier 933 4 – 72 11 10 Beauceron 42 2 – 23 10 10 Akita 1029 0 – 91 7 7 Belgian Shepherd 249 0 – 37 8 8 Dog (Groenendael) Alaskan Malamute 1248 0 – 78 10 10 Belgian Shepherd 16 5 - 16 10 14 Dog (Laekenois) Anatolian 63 3 – 67 9
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Endochondral Skeleton
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Development of the Endochondral Skeleton Fanxin Long1,2 and David M. Ornitz2 1Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 2Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 Correspondence: fl[email protected] SUMMARY Much of the mammalian skeleton is composed of bones that originate from cartilage templates through endochondral ossification. Elucidating the mechanisms that control endochondral bone development is critical for understanding human skeletal diseases, injury response, and aging. Mouse genetic studies in the past 15 years have provided unprecedented insights about molecules regulating chondrocyte formation, chondrocyte maturation, and osteoblast differ- entiation, all key processes of endochondral bone development. These include the roles of the secreted proteins IHH, PTHrP, BMPs, WNTs, and FGFs, their receptors, and transcription factors such as SOX9, RUNX2, and OSX, in regulating chondrocyte and osteoblast biology. This review aims to integrate the known functions of extracellular signals and transcription factors that regulate development of the endochondral skeleton. Outline 1 Introduction 5 Osteoblastogenesis 2 Mesenchymal condensation 6 Closing remarks 3 Chondrocyte differentiation References 4 Growth plate development Editors: Patrick P.L. Tam, W. James Nelson, and Janet Rossant Additional Perspectives on Mammalian Development available at www.cshperspectives.org Copyright # 2013 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008334 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013;5:a008334 1 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press F.
    [Show full text]
  • Femur Pelvis HIP JOINT Femoral Head in Acetabulum Acetabular
    Anatomy of the Hip Joint Overview The hip joint is one of the largest weight-bearing HIP JOINT joints in the body. This ball-and-socket joint allows the leg to move and rotate while keeping the body Femoral head in stable and balanced. Let's take a closer look at the acetabulum main parts of the hip joint's anatomy. Pelvis Bones Two bones meet at the hip joint, the femur and the pelvis. The femur, commonly called the "thighbone," is the longest and heaviest bone of the body. At the top of the femur, positioned on the femoral neck, is the femoral head. This is the "ball" of the hip joint. The other part of the joint – the Femur "socket" – is found in the pelvis. The pelvis is a bone made of three sections: the ilium, the ischium and the pubis. The socket is located where these three sections fuse. The proper name of the socket is the "acetabulum." The head of the femur fits tightly into this cup-shaped cavity. Articular Cartilage The femoral head and the acetabulum are covered Acetabular with a layer of articular cartilage. This tough, smooth tissue protects the bones. It allows them to labrum glide smoothly against each other as the ball moves in the socket. Soft Tissues Several soft tissue structures work together to hold the femoral head securely in place. The acetabulum is surrounded by a ring of cartilage called the "acetabular labrum." This deepens the socket and helps keep the ball from slipping out of alignment. It also acts as a shock absorber.
    [Show full text]
  • Sciatica and Chronic Pain
    Sciatica and Chronic Pain Past, Present and Future Robert W. Baloh 123 Sciatica and Chronic Pain Robert W. Baloh Sciatica and Chronic Pain Past, Present and Future Robert W. Baloh, MD Department of Neurology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA, USA ISBN 978-3-319-93903-2 ISBN 978-3-319-93904-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93904-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018952076 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthopedic-Conditions-Treated.Pdf
    Orthopedic and Orthopedic Surgery Conditions Treated Accessory navicular bone Achondroplasia ACL injury Acromioclavicular (AC) joint Acromioclavicular (AC) joint Adamantinoma arthritis sprain Aneurysmal bone cyst Angiosarcoma Ankle arthritis Apophysitis Arthrogryposis Aseptic necrosis Askin tumor Avascular necrosis Benign bone tumor Biceps tear Biceps tendinitis Blount’s disease Bone cancer Bone metastasis Bowlegged deformity Brachial plexus injury Brittle bone disease Broken ankle/broken foot Broken arm Broken collarbone Broken leg Broken wrist/broken hand Bunions Carpal tunnel syndrome Cavovarus foot deformity Cavus foot Cerebral palsy Cervical myelopathy Cervical radiculopathy Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Chondrosarcoma Chordoma Chronic regional multifocal osteomyelitis Clubfoot Congenital hand deformities Congenital myasthenic syndromes Congenital pseudoarthrosis Contractures Desmoid tumors Discoid meniscus Dislocated elbow Dislocated shoulder Dislocation Dislocation – hip Dislocation – knee Dupuytren's contracture Early-onset scoliosis Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Elbow fracture Elbow impingement Elbow instability Elbow loose body Eosinophilic granuloma Epiphyseal dysplasia Ewing sarcoma Extra finger/toes Failed total hip replacement Failed total knee replacement Femoral nonunion Fibrosarcoma Fibrous dysplasia Fibular hemimelia Flatfeet Foot deformities Foot injuries Ganglion cyst Genu valgum Genu varum Giant cell tumor Golfer's elbow Gorham’s disease Growth plate arrest Growth plate fractures Hammertoe and mallet toe Heel cord contracture
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperplasia (Growth Factors
    Adaptations Robbins Basic Pathology Robbins Basic Pathology Robbins Basic Pathology Coagulation Robbins Basic Pathology Robbins Basic Pathology Homeostasis • Maintenance of a steady state Adaptations • Reversible functional and structural responses to physiologic stress and some pathogenic stimuli • New altered “steady state” is achieved Adaptive responses • Hypertrophy • Altered demand (muscle . hyper = above, more activity) . trophe = nourishment, food • Altered stimulation • Hyperplasia (growth factors, . plastein = (v.) to form, to shape; hormones) (n.) growth, development • Altered nutrition • Dysplasia (including gas exchange) . dys = bad or disordered • Metaplasia . meta = change or beyond • Hypoplasia . hypo = below, less • Atrophy, Aplasia, Agenesis . a = without . nourishment, form, begining Robbins Basic Pathology Cell death, the end result of progressive cell injury, is one of the most crucial events in the evolution of disease in any tissue or organ. It results from diverse causes, including ischemia (reduced blood flow), infection, and toxins. Cell death is also a normal and essential process in embryogenesis, the development of organs, and the maintenance of homeostasis. Two principal pathways of cell death, necrosis and apoptosis. Nutrient deprivation triggers an adaptive cellular response called autophagy that may also culminate in cell death. Adaptations • Hypertrophy • Hyperplasia • Atrophy • Metaplasia HYPERTROPHY Hypertrophy refers to an increase in the size of cells, resulting in an increase in the size of the organ No new cells, just larger cells. The increased size of the cells is due to the synthesis of more structural components of the cells usually proteins. Cells capable of division may respond to stress by undergoing both hyperrtophy and hyperplasia Non-dividing cell increased tissue mass is due to hypertrophy.
    [Show full text]