2019 Banisteria Steury Aderidae.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E
Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water -
An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera)
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida September 2003 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera) Anneke E. Lisberg University of Wisconsin-Madison Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin-Madison Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Lisberg, Anneke E. and Young, Daniel K., "An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera)" (2003). Insecta Mundi. 39. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/39 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 17, No. 3-4, September-December, 2003 195 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera) Anneke E. Lisberg and Daniel K. Young Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin-Madison 445 Russell Labs 1630 Linden Dr. Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A. Abstract: A three-year survey of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera) encompassing a compilation of data from literature records and local collections as well as field work including trapping, hand-collecting, and rearing yielded 68 species comprising 14 genera in three tribes. Sixty-three species (92% of Wisconsin fauna) represent new state species records, not previously recorded from the state in the literature. Plant-associations and state- specific temporal and spatial distribution data for larvae and adults are noted as available. Distributional records suggest 16 additional species and one additional genus are likely to occur in Wisconsin. -
Nomina Insecta Nearctica Aderidae Agyrtidae
43 NOMINA INSECTA NEARCTICA Vanonus congener Casey 1905 Syn. ADERIDAE Vanonus sagax Casey 1895 (Vanonus) Vanonus floridanus Casey 1895 Syn. Vanonus uniformis Werner 1990 (Vanonus) Aderus Westwood 1830 Vanonus valgus Werner 1990 (Vanonus) Phomalus Casey 1895 Syn. Vanonus vigilans Casey 1895 (Vanonus) Vanonus wickhami Casey 1895 (Vanonus) Aderus brunnipennis LeConte 1875 (Xylophilus) Tanilotes lacustris Casey 1895 Syn. Aderus populneus Panzer 1796 (Notoxus) Aderus saginatus Casey 1895 (Phomalus) Ariotus Casey 1895 AGYRTIDAE Scanylus Casey 1895 Syn. Ariotus luteolus Casey 1895 (Scanylus) Agyrtes Froelich 1799 Ariotus pruinosus Casey 1895 (Scanylus) Agyrtecanus Reitter 1901 Syn. Ariotus caseyi Pic 1896 Syn. Lendomus Casey 1924 Syn. Ariotus quercicola Schwarz 1878 (Xylophilus) Ariotus subtropicus Casey 1895 (Ariotus) Agyrtes longulus LeConte 1859 (Necrophilus) Lendomus politus Casey 1924 Syn. Axylophilus Casey 1895 Agyrtes similis Fall 1937 (Agyrtes) Axylophilus constrictus Fall 1901 (Xylophilus) Apteroloma Hatch 1927 Axylophilus nucleus Fall 1901 (Xylophilus) Axylophilus yuccae Casey 1895 (Axylophilus) Apteroloma arizonica Van Dyke 1928 (Pteroloma) Apteroloma caraboides Fall 1907 (Pteroloma) Cnopus Champion 1893 Apteroloma tahoeca Fall 1927 (Pteroloma) Apteroloma tenuicornis LeConte 1859 (Necrophilus) Cnopus impressus LeConte 1875 (Xylophilus) Ipelates Reitter 1885 Emelinus Casey 1895 Pelates Horn 1880 Homo. Sphaeroloma Portevin 1905 Syn. Emelinus butleri Werner 1956 (Emelinus) Pelatines Cockerell 1906 Syn. Emelinus huachucanus Werner 1956 (Emelinus) Brachyloma Portevin 1914 Syn. Emelinus melsheimeri LeConte 1855 (Xylophilus) Necrophilodes Champion 1923 Syn. Emelinus ashmeadi Casey 1895 Syn. Necrophiloides Hatch 1927 Missp. Ganascus Casey 1895 Ipelates latus Mannerheim 1852 (Necrophilus) Sandytes Casey 1895 Syn. Lyrosoma Mannerheim 1853 Ganascus ptinoides Schwarz 1878 (Xylophilus) Ganascus ventricosus LeConte 1875 (Xylophilus) Lyrosoma opacum Mannerheim 1853 (Lyrosoma) Ganascus opimus Casey 1895 Syn. -
The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State -
Ant-Like Flower Beetles (Coleoptera: Anthicidae) of the Uk, Ireland and Channel Isles
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 23: 2010 99 ANT-LIKE FLOWER BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: ANTHICIDAE) OF THE UK, IRELAND AND CHANNEL ISLES DMITRY TELNOV Stopinu novads, Darza iela 10, LV-2130, Dzidrinas, Latvia; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Anthicidae or ant-like flower beetles of the UK, Ireland and Channel Isles are reviewed. A species list, identification key, short diagnoses and illustrations of all taxa are given. Brief information on known ecological preferences of species is given. Key words: identification, distribution, key, United Kingdom, Ireland, fauna, ecology. INTRODUCTION Anthicidae are a cosmopolitan family of small to medium-sized, fast-moving beetles of the superfamily Tenebrionoidea. Anthicidae are represented in the World fauna by approximately 100 genera, and about 3500 species (Chandler, 2010). Only a few species are known from the fossil record. The last revision of the British Anthicidae was published by F. D. Buck (1954) in the well-known series Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects. Since then, there have been numerous nomenclatural changes within Anthicidae, and some additional species (introduced) have been recorded from the UK, making Buck’s key out of date. During 2004 and 2005 a total of 3356 specimens of Anthicidae from the UK and Ireland were examined by the author, mainly from the collections of The Natural History Museum (London), Oxford University Museum of Natural History and National Museum of Ireland. Additional data for more than 2100 specimens were received from other British museums and private collections between 2005 and 2007. A new key and short diagnoses for the genera are presented, as well as data on habitats and general distribution of species. -
Coleoptera: Introduction and Key to Families
Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Vol. IV. Part 1. HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS COLEOPTERA INTRODUCTION AND KEYS TO FAMILIES By R. A. CROWSON LONDON Published by the Society and Sold at its Rooms 41, Queen's Gate, S.W. 7 31st December, 1956 Price-res. c~ . HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS The aim of this series of publications is to provide illustrated keys to the whole of the British Insects (in so far as this is possible), in ten volumes, as follows : I. Part 1. General Introduction. Part 9. Ephemeroptera. , 2. Thysanura. 10. Odonata. , 3. Protura. , 11. Thysanoptera. 4. Collembola. , 12. Neuroptera. , 5. Dermaptera and , 13. Mecoptera. Orthoptera. , 14. Trichoptera. , 6. Plecoptera. , 15. Strepsiptera. , 7. Psocoptera. , 16. Siphonaptera. , 8. Anoplura. 11. Hemiptera. Ill. Lepidoptera. IV. and V. Coleoptera. VI. Hymenoptera : Symphyta and Aculeata. VII. Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea. VIII. Hymenoptera : Cynipoidea, Chalcidoidea, and Serphoidea. IX. Diptera: Nematocera and Brachycera. X. Diptera: Cyclorrhapha. Volumes 11 to X will be divided into parts of convenient size, but it is not possible to specify in advance the taxonomic content of each part. Conciseness and cheapness are main objectives in this new series, and each part will be the work of a specialist, or of a group of specialists. -
Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera
The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 8 Number 3 - Fall 1975 Number 3 - Fall 1975 Article 4 October 1975 Current Classification of the amiliesF of Coleoptera M G. de Viedma University of Madrid M L. Nelson Wayne State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation de Viedma, M G. and Nelson, M L. 1975. "Current Classification of the amiliesF of Coleoptera," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 8 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol8/iss3/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. de Viedma and Nelson: Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST CURRENT CLASSIFICATION OF THE FAMILIES OF COLEOPTERA M. G. de viedmal and M. L. els son' Several works on the order Coleoptera have appeared in recent years, some of them creating new superfamilies, others modifying the constitution of these or creating new families, finally others are genera1 revisions of the order. The authors believe that the current classification of this order, incorporating these changes would prove useful. The following outline is based mainly on Crowson (1960, 1964, 1966, 1967, 1971, 1972, 1973) and Crowson and Viedma (1964). For characters used on classification see Viedma (1972) and for family synonyms Abdullah (1969). Major features of this conspectus are the rejection of the two sections of Adephaga (Geadephaga and Hydradephaga), based on Bell (1966) and the new sequence of Heteromera, based mainly on Crowson (1966), with adaptations. -
Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results .............................................................................................................. -
Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea: Aderidae)
Zootaxa 4338 (3): 533–545 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4338.3.8 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5F0274A4-60D8-44CD-BD88-C6017F203C51 A review of North American Elonus species, with description of E. gruberi n. sp. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea: Aderidae) NICOLAS GOMPEL Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Fakultät für Biologie, Biozentrum, Großhaderner Strasse 2, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This work provides a taxonomic survey of the North American species of the genus Elonus Casey, 1895 (Coleoptera: Te- nebrionoidea: Aderidae). It includes the description of a new species, Elonus gruberi n. sp. from the United States, related to E. hesperus Werner, 1990 and to E. basalis (LeConte, 1855). A review and key to the North American species is pro- vided. Key words: Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea, Aderidae, United States, dichotomous key Introduction Aderidae (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea) represents a small family of poorly studied beetles, whose systematics await major revision and definition. In comparison to other regions of the world, the North American Aderidae have received more attention and are overall easier to identify to the species level thanks to the work of the late Floyd Werner (Werner, 1990, 1992). Some genera, however, such as Zonantes Casey, Vanonus Casey, and Elonus Casey, appear fairly homogeneous in their general habitus appearance, and likely contain more species than are currently known. Six species from North America are currently placed in the genus Elonus Casey, 1895 (Chandler, 2002). -
Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire
Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Version Date Authors Notes 4.0 January 2009 MHa, MCH, PB, MD, AMcV Edits and updates from wider consultation group 5.0 May 2009 MHa, MCH, PB, MD, AMcV, GDB, RM Additional edits and corrections 6.0 November 2009 Mha, GH, AF, GDB, RM Additional edits and corrections This document was prepared by Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes Environmental Records Centre (BMERC) and Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and commissioned by the Oxfordshire and Berkshire Local Authorities and by Buckinghamshire County Council Contents 1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................4 2.0 Selection Criteria for Local Wildlife Sites .....................................................6 3.0 Where does a Local Wildlife Site start and finish? Drawing the line............. 17 4.0 UKBAP Habitat descriptions ………………………………………………………………….19 4.1 Lowland Calcareous Grassland………………………………………………………… 20 4.2 Lowland Dry Acid Grassland................................................................ 23 4.3 Lowland Meadows.............................................................................. 26 4.4 Lowland heathland............................................................................. 29 4.5 Eutrophic Standing Water ................................................................... 32 4.6. Mesotrophic Lakes ............................................................................ 35 4.7 -
The Role of Trees Outside Woodlands in Providing Habitat and Ecological Networks for Saproxylic Invertebrates
Natural England Commissioned Report NECR225a The role of trees outside woodlands in providing habitat and ecological networks for saproxylic invertebrates Part 1 Designing a field study to test initial hypotheses First published 1 December 2016 www.gov.uk/natural -england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background This work was commissioned as a preparatory Part 2 was funded by the Woodland Trust. phase to explore options to design and plan a practical research study which answers the The work makes recommendations for a question: what is the role of trees outside suitable design for the proposed study, based woodlands in providing habitat and ecological on a standardised sampling protocol. Four networks? In order to help increase our locations are identified as possible sites for field- knowledge of the role of non-woodland trees to testing the protocol, but significant shortfalls in providing landscape connectivity. our current knowledge of the local treescapes have been identified, and it is clear that further It reviews and summarises what is known about baseline tree survey is needed before the fully the underlying biology of the veteran tree developed study can begin. ecosystem, the biogeography of trees in the English landscape, and the various techniques In the meantime, a field trial will be considered which have been developed to study the at one or more of the four identified study sites, saproxylic invertebrate fauna associated with possibly using combinations of site staff, the those veteran trees. -
Review of the Natural History of the Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea: Endomychidae)
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 4-2009 Review of the Natural History of the Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea: Endomychidae) F. W. Shockley University of Georgia, Athens, GA K. W. Tomaszewska Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland J. V. McHugh University of Georgia, Athens, GA Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Shockley, F. W.; Tomaszewska, K. W.; and McHugh, J. V., "Review of the Natural History of the Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea: Endomychidae)" (2009). Insecta Mundi. 597. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/597 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0072 Review of the Natural History of the Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea: Endomychidae) F. W. Shockley Department of Entomology 413 Biological Sciences Building University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602-2603 USA K. W. Tomaszewska Museum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland J. V. McHugh Department of Entomology 413 Biological Sciences Building University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2603 USA Date of Issue: April 10, 2009 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC E NTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL F. W. Shockley, K. W. Tomaszewska, and J. V. McHugh Review of the Natural History of the Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea: Endomychidae) Insecta Mundi 0072: 1-24 Published in 2009 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc.