The Philippine Insurrection the U.S. Navy in a Military Operation Other Than War, 1899-1902
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2004-12 The Philippine Insurrection the U.S. Navy in a military operation other than war, 1899-1902 Carlson, Ted W. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1288 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE PHILIPPINE INSURRECTION: THE U.S. NAVY IN A MILITARY OPERATION OTHER THAN WAR, 1899-1902 by Ted W. Carlson December 2004 Thesis Advisor: Kenneth J. Hagan Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2004 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: The Philippine Insurrection: The U.S. Navy in a 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Military Operation Other Than War, 1899-1902 6. AUTHOR(S) Carlson, Ted W. 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING / MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) U.S. naval doctrine has been dominated by the Mahanian concept of massing large capital ships for over one hundred years. Yet, it was a Cyclone-class patrol craft, a USCG cutter, and an Australian frigate that pushed up the Khor-Abd-Allah waterway and opened up the port of Umm Qasr, Iraq, during the Second Gulf War. They continue to protect it and the surrounding oil infrastructure from attack from insurgents and terrorists today. With the navy’s current interest in transformation, the question arises, is the navy as presently configured well suited for today’s threats? This thesis explores the question of how should the navy meet threats to national interests. This is accomplished through historical analysis of an event that is similar to the situation today: The Philippine Insurrection (1899-1902). This episode showcases the shortcomings of the navy’s conventional approach to military operations other than war, and the need for change. In today’s asymmetric environment, the past provides insight into effective means for handling these types of threats. This thesis concludes that the navy needs to diversify itself to incorporate different ship platforms, platforms that incorporate the utility of old with the technology of new. 14. SUBJECT TERMS Navy, Philippines, Insurrection, Gunboats, Guerilla Warfare, Blockade, 15. NUMBER OF Asymmetric Warfare, Pacification, Army. PAGES 221 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UL NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THE PHILIPPINE INSURRECTION: THE U.S. NAVY IN A MILITARY OPERATION OTHER THAN WAR, 1899-1902 Ted W. Carlson Lieutenant, United States Navy B.A., San Diego State University, 1999 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN NATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL December 2004 Author: Ted W. Carlson Approved by: Kenneth J. Hagan Thesis Advisor Douglas Porch Second Reader James J. Wirtz Chairman, Department of National Security Affairs iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv ABSTRACT U.S. naval doctrine has been dominated by the Mahanian concept of massing large capital ships for over one hundred years. Yet, it was a Cyclone-class patrol craft, a USCG cutter, and an Australian frigate that pushed up the Khor-Abd-Allah waterway and opened up the port of Umm Qasr, Iraq, during the Second Gulf War. They continue to protect it and the surrounding oil infrastructure from insurgent and terrorist attacks today. With the navy’s current interest in transformation, the question arises, is the navy as presently configured well suited for today’s threats? This thesis explores the question of how should the navy meet threats to national interests. This is accomplished through historical analysis of an event that is similar to the situation today: The Philippine Insurrection (1899-1902). This episode showcases the shortcomings of the navy’s conventional approach to military operations other than war, and the need for change. In today’s asymmetric environment, the past provides insight into effective means for handling these types of threats. This thesis concludes that the navy needs to diversify itself to incorporate different ship platforms, platforms that incorporate the utility of old with the technology of new. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 A. OUTLINE .........................................................................................................4 B. METHODOLOGY AND RESEARCH..........................................................6 C. PRE-HOSTILITIES ........................................................................................8 II. THE COMMENCEMENT OF HOSTILITIES AND CONVENTIONAL WARFARE.................................................................................................................17 A. THE CAMPAIGNS .......................................................................................23 1. Manila (February 4, 1899 – March 17, 1899)..................................23 2. Iloilo (February 8 – 12, 1899)............................................................27 3. Malolos (March 25 – August 16, 1899).............................................30 4. Laguna de Bay (April 8 – 17, 1899)..................................................31 5. San Isidro (April 21 – May 30, 1899, and October 15 – November 19, 1899) ...........................................................................33 6. Zapote River, June 13, 1899..............................................................37 7. Monsoons and Reorganization .........................................................40 8. Cavite, October 7 – 13, 1899, and January 4 – February 9, 1900..45 9. Tarlac, November 5 – 20, 1899 .........................................................48 10. San Fabian, November 6 – 19, 1899 .................................................49 B. THE BLOCKADE .........................................................................................50 C. OTHER OPERATIONS................................................................................63 D. CONCLUSION ..............................................................................................69 III. THE HEMP EXPEDITION AND GUERILLA WARFARE (1900) ....................73 A. THE HEMP EXPEDITION..........................................................................74 B. GUERILLA WARFARE AND PACIFICATION ......................................81 C. THE BLOCKADE .........................................................................................99 D. THE CHINA RELIEF EXPEDITION ......................................................111 E. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................113 IV. THE FALL OF THE GENERALS, BATANGAS, SAMAR, AND THE END..121 A. THE ARMY..................................................................................................122 B. CIVIL ADMINISTRATION.......................................................................125 C. THE NAVY...................................................................................................126 D. THE INSURGENTS ....................................................................................131 E. FALL OF THE GENERALS......................................................................131 1. Luzon.................................................................................................131 2. The Visayas.......................................................................................136 F. THE PERSISTENT ONES (LUCKBAN AND MALVAR).....................139 3. Batangas............................................................................................140 4. Samar ................................................................................................144 G. THE END OF HOSTILITIES ....................................................................159