DOCSLIB.ORG

Indigenizing Grand Canyon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indigenizing Grand Canyon Utah Law Review Volume 2021 Number 1 Article 3 2-2021 Indigenizing Grand Canyon Jason Anthony Robison University of Wyoming College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.law.utah.edu/ulr Part of the Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Law Commons Recommended Citation Jason Anthony Robison, Indigenizing Grand Canyon, 2021 Utah Law Rev. 101 (2021). https://doi.org/ 10.26054/0D-S31P-8CH1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Utah Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Law Review by an authorized editor of Utah Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INDIGENIZING GRAND CANYON Jason Anthony Robison* The magical place commonly called the “Grand Canyon” is Native space. Eleven tribes hold traditional connections to the canyon according to the National Park Service. This Article is about relationships between these tribes and the agency—past, present, and future. Grand Canyon National Park’s 2019 centennial afforded a valuable opportunity to reflect on these relationships and to envision what they might become. A reconception of the relationships has begun in recent decades that evidences a shift across the National Park System as a whole. This reconception should continue. Drawing on the tribal vision for Bears Ears National Monument, this Article advocates for Grand Canyon tribes and the Park Service to consider forming a Grand Canyon Commission for cooperative management of Grand Canyon National Park. Establishing this Commission would mark the vanguard of the relational reconception, and, in this precise sense, the Commission would lay a foundation for “indigenizing” Grand Canyon. * © 2021 Jason Anthony Robison. Professor, University of Wyoming College of Law. S.J.D., Harvard Law School (2013); LL.M., Harvard Law School (2009); J.D., University of Oregon School of Law (2006); B.S., Environmental Studies, University of Utah (2003). This Article is dedicated to my Hopi friend Howard Dennis on Second Mesa, both for his friendship and for being a spiritual guide at Ӧngtupqa. The Article grows out of a gracious invitation from the University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law to be the 2019–2020 Stegner Young Scholar. I cannot thank the Stegner Center faculty and staff enough for selecting and hosting me. They provided a much-appreciated excuse for field work at a place of awe since my childhood, Grand Canyon National Park, where I incurred research debts to Janet Balsom and Kim Besom coupled with further debts to Roger Clark and Sarana Riggs at the Grand Canyon Trust’s office in Flagstaff. My heartfelt gratitude extends to all of you. Thanks, too, to my colleagues Robert Adler, Robin Craig, Sam Kalen, and Robert Keiter for their formative input on drafts of this piece. All errors or omissions are mine alone. 101 102 UTAH LAW REVIEW [NO. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................102 II. GRAND CANYON AS NATIVE SPACE .............................................................105 A. Neighbors ............................................................................................ 109 1. Havasuw’ Baaja (Havasupai) ....................................................... 109 2. Hwal’bay (Hualapai).................................................................... 111 3. Diné (Navajo)............................................................................... 112 B. Nearby ................................................................................................ 114 1. Hopituh Shi-nu-mu (Hopi) ............................................................ 114 2. A:Shiwi (Zuni) .............................................................................. 116 3. Wipuhk’a’bah-Dil’zhe’e (Yavapai-Apache) .................................. 119 4. Nüwü (Southern Paiute) ............................................................... 119 III. COLONIAL RELATIONS AT GRAND CANYON ................................................120 A. Construction ........................................................................................ 122 1. Constitutionalization .................................................................... 123 2. Native Segregation ....................................................................... 124 3. Federal Occupation ...................................................................... 127 B. Perpetuation ........................................................................................ 130 1. Federal Expansion ....................................................................... 132 2. Native Persistence ........................................................................ 134 C. Reconception ....................................................................................... 141 1. Nascent Systemic Change ............................................................. 142 2. Grand Canyon Reconception ........................................................ 148 IV. WALKING TOWARD COOPERATION .............................................................158 A. Bears Ears........................................................................................... 161 1. Advisory Committee ..................................................................... 162 2. Commission .................................................................................. 164 B. From Bears Ears to Grand Canyon ..................................................... 167 1. Statutory Foundation .................................................................... 168 2. Mandate Alignment ...................................................................... 170 3. Forms & Phasing ......................................................................... 173 V. CONCLUSION ...............................................................................................181 I. INTRODUCTION “The United States, acting through Congress . recognizes the special legal and political relationship Indian tribes have with the United States and the solemn covenant with the land we share. .”1 That’s how the apology began, though you may have never heard of it. “The United States, acting through Congress . commends and honors Native Peoples for the thousands of years that they have 1 Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-118, § 8113(a)(1), 123 Stat. 3409, 3453 (2009). 2021] INDIGENIZING GRAND CANYON 103 stewarded and protected this land . .”2 Tucked into a defense appropriations bill, President Obama did not endorse the apology, despite being urged to do so.3 It was a “silent apology” or “(non)apology” for some Native Americans.4 “The United States, acting through Congress . expresses its regret for the ramifications of former wrongs and its commitment to build on the positive relationships of the past and present to move toward a brighter future where all the people of this land live reconciled as brothers and sisters, and harmoniously steward and protect this land together.”5 Words on a page. Lofty rhetoric—a “solemn covenant with the land we share,”6 a commitment to “harmoniously steward and protect this land together,”7 etc. Let’s make these words real at the National Park System’s diadem: Grand Canyon.8 That is this Article’s aim. It is about relationships—past, present, and future— between the Park Service and eleven Native American tribes with ancestral connections to the Grand Canyon.9 These relationships do not exist in a vacuum. Rather, they are globally relevant to any circumstance where a settler state10 2 Id. § 8113(a)(2), 123 Stat. at 3453. 3 “The United States, acting through Congress . urges the President to acknowledge the wrongs of the United States against Indian tribes in the history of the United States in order to bring healing to this land.” Id. § 8113(a)(6), 123 Stat. at 3453. 4 Mark Charles, Mark Charles: U.S. ‘Apology’ to Indian People Goes Unnoticed, INDIANZ (Mar. 12, 2012), https://www.indianz.com/News/2012/03/12/mark-charles-us- apology-to-ind.asp [https://perma.cc/PYD4-C6C3]. As expressed by Navajo tribal member Mark Charles: “I was shocked, confused, embarrassed and ashamed when I learned, two years after the fact, that the US government had issued an apology to its Native American citizens, but did very little to publicize it, and even seemed intent on burying it in a 67-page Defense Department appropriations bill.” Id. 5 § 8113(a)(5), 123 Stat. at 3453. 6 Id. § 8113(a)(1), 123 Stat. at 3453. 7 Id. § 8113(a)(5), 123 Stat. at 3453. 8 This Article builds on an earlier essay written by the author for Grand Canyon National Park’s 2019 centennial. See Jason Anthony Robison, Grand Canyon as Legal Creation, 60 J. ARIZ. HIST. 557 (2019). The metaphor of Grand Canyon as a diadem is from ROBERT H. KELLER & MICHAEL F. TUREK, AMERICAN INDIANS & NATIONAL PARKS 131 (1998). 9 The specific tribes and their respective connections to the Grand Canyon region are surveyed in Part II. These unfathomably rich connections should inform the legal rules at the Grand Canyon governing both (1) how human beings interact with one another, and (2) how human beings interact with other parts of nature (relations) within the ecosystem. For shorthand, these two strands of interactions can be referred to as “socioecological relations.” Future relationships between the Park Service and Grand Canyon tribes—for example, cooperative management—will shape what socioecological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR
    Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR Colorado River at Mile 50. Cover: Salt River. Letter from the President ivers are the great treasury of noted scientists and other experts reviewed the survey design, and biological diversity in the western state-specific experts reviewed the results for each state. RUnited States. As evidence mounts The result is a state-by-state list of more than 250 of the West’s that climate is changing even faster than we outstanding streams, some protected, some still vulnerable. The feared, it becomes essential that we create Great Rivers of the West is a new type of inventory to serve the sanctuaries on our best, most natural rivers modern needs of river conservation—a list that Western Rivers that will harbor viable populations of at-risk Conservancy can use to strategically inform its work. species—not only charismatic species like salmon, but a broad range of aquatic and This is one of 11 state chapters in the report. Also available are a terrestrial species. summary of the entire report, as well as the full report text. That is what we do at Western Rivers Conservancy. We buy land With the right tools in hand, Western Rivers Conservancy is to create sanctuaries along the most outstanding rivers in the West seizing once-in-a-lifetime opportunities to acquire and protect – places where fish, wildlife and people can flourish. precious streamside lands on some of America’s finest rivers. With a talented team in place, combining more than 150 years This is a time when investment in conservation can yield huge of land acquisition experience and offices in Oregon, Colorado, dividends for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon U.S
    National Park Service Grand Canyon U.S. Department of the Interior Grand Canyon National Park Arizona Hualapai Tribe and Skywalk The Hualapai (WALL-uh-pie), the “People of the Tall Pines,” have lived in the Southwest for untold generations. Traditionally their homelands stretched from Grand Canyon to the Bill Williams River in west-central Arizona and from the Black Mountains bordering the Colorado River to the San Francisco Peaks. Pri- marily nomadic hunter-gathers, they also traded with nearby tribes. The Hualapai Reservation of just less than 1,000,000 acres (404,686 ha) was established in 1883. Today the tribe counts about 2,300 members. Peach Springs on Highway 66 is the tribal headquarters. The tribe operates a hotel, restaurant, and gift shop in Peach Springs. While limited ranching, timber harvest, and guided hunts provide some income, the tourist industry offers the best opportunity for employment of tribal members. The Skywalk at The Hualapai Tribe has chosen a site at the far The Skywalk, managed by the Hualapai Tribe and Grand Canyon West western end of Grand Canyon about 250 miles located on tribal lands, consists of a horseshoe- (400 km) by road, a five hour drive, from Grand shaped steel frame with glass floor and sides that Canyon Village to offer a variety of visitor services projects about 70 feet (21 m) from the canyon rim. including the Skywalk in a development called While the Skywalk is the most famous attraction Grand Canyon West. Food service is limited and at Grand Canyon West, tours also include other usually as part of a package tour.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gila and Little Colorado General Stream Adjudications
    THE GILA AND LITTLE COLORADO GENERAL STREAM ADJUDICATIONS Cynthia M. Chandley 1 ©© 2014 2014 Snell Snell & & Wilmer Wilmer Arizona’s Watersheds 2 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Scope of Adjudications Gila Adjudication Little Colorado River Adjudication 30,000 5,000 SOCs SOCs Claimants 85,000 14,000 Claimants 3 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Initiation of Arizona’s Adjudications SRP initiates U.S. Supreme Court Phelps Dodge Verde River Buckeye Irrigation decides jurisdiction in on- initiates Little Adjudication District intervenes going state adjudications. Colorado River Ariz. v. San Carlos Adjudication Apache Tribe (U.S. 1983) 1974 1976 1978 1979 1980 1981 1983 1985 Arizona Supreme SRP initiates Phelps Dodge initiates Court consolidates Salt River Gila River Adjudication Arizona Arizona Supreme Court Gila River cases Adjudication Adjudication statues decides state jurisdiction ASARCO initiates San revised over federal and Indian Pedro River Adjudication water rights. U.S. v. Superior Court (Ariz. 1985) 4 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Maricopa County Court Proceedings • 1986 – Judge Goodfarb issues Pretrial Order No. 1 • 1990 – Arizona Supreme Court grants interlocutory review of six key issues 5 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Arizona Supreme Court Rulings • Issue 1: Service of process – Gila I (1992) • Issue 2: Subflow – Gila II (1993) & Gila IV (2000) • Issue 3: Indian reserved water rights – Gila V (2001) • Issues 4 & 5: Federal reserved groundwater rights – Gila III (1999) • Issue 6: To be decided. 6 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Major Adjudication Issues Subflow Trial No. 1; Adjudication Gila III and San Subflow Order Carlos Apache Court defines ADWR Subflow defines saturated Tribe, et al. v. ADWR Subflow 50%/90-day test Technical Report floodplain Holocene Superior Court Delineation ADWR Revised alluvium and evidentiary Report Subflow Report hearing 1986 1988 1993 1994 1995 1999 2000 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2014 2012 20142014 Pretrial Order Gila IV – affirms Gila II: rejects Subflow Subflow trial No.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona
    2.SOB nH in ntoiOGIGM. JAN 3 1 1989 Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1701-C Chapter C Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona By ED DE WITT, S.M. RICHARD, J.R. HASSEMER, and W.F. HANNA U.S. Geological Survey J.R. THOMPSON U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1701 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS- WEST-CENTRAL ARIZONA AND PART OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publlcatlon Data Mineral resources of the Harquahala Mountains wilderness study area, La Paz and Maricopa counties, Arizona. (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas west-central Arizona and part of San Bernardino County, California ; ch. C) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1701-C) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1701-C 1. Mines and mineral resources Arizona Harquahala Mountains Wilderness. 2. Harquahala Mountains (Ariz.) I. DeWitt, Ed. II. Series. III. Series: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1701. QE75.B9 no. 1701-C 557.3 s [553'.09791'72] 88-600012 [TN24.A6] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National
    CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scoping Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Scoping Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Publication of the Notice of Intent ....................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Other Outreach Methods ....................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Opportunities for Public Comment ................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Public Scoping Meetings .................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Cooperating Agency Involvement ................................................................................................... 4 2.6 National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal Consultation ....................................................... 5 3 Submission Processing and Comment Coding .................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • GR-03-13 Revised Title 5, Criminal Code
    GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY SACATON, AZ 85147 ORDINANCE GR-03-13 THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY COUNCIL HEREBY AMENDS THE 2009 GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY CODE BY RESCINDING TITLE 5, CRIMINAL CODE, AND ENACTING THE REVISED CRIMINAL CODE WHEREAS, the Gila River Indian Community Council (the "Community Council") is the governing body of the Gila River Indian Community (the "Community), a federally recognized and sovereign Indian tribe; and WHEREAS, the Community Council is authorized by Article XV, Section l(a)(9) of the Constitution and Bylaws of the Community (March 17, 1960) (the "Constitution") to promote and protect the health, peace, morals, education, and general welfare of the Community and its members; and WHEREAS, the Community Council is authorized by Article XV, Section 1(a)(17) of the Constitution to provide for the maintenance of law and order and the administration of justice by establishing a Community Court and police force and defining the powers and duties thereof; and WHEREAS, the Community Council is authorized by Article XV, Section 1(a)(19) of the Constitution to pass ordinances necessary or incidental to the exercise of any of their powers authorized by Article XV, Section 1(a) of the Constitution; and WHEREAS, the power to enact laws and ordinances is an inherent function of self-government which the Community has exercised over the years; and WHEREAS, the safety of the Community, the ability to prosecute criminal behavior, and the ability to order longer or enhanced sentences as appropriate to the offense and
    [Show full text]
  • The Central Arizona Project
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: Interbasin Transfers: A Short 1982 Course (Summer Conference, June 7-10) 6-9-1982 The Central Arizona Project Jon Kyl Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/new-sources-of-water-for-energy- development-and-growth-interbasin-transfers Part of the Agriculture Law Commons, Animal Law Commons, Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Contracts Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Hydrology Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Legal History Commons, Legislation Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Transportation Law Commons, Water Law Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Citation Information Kyl, Jon, "The Central Arizona Project" (1982). New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: Interbasin Transfers: A Short Course (Summer Conference, June 7-10). https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/new-sources-of-water-for-energy-development-and-growth-interbasin- transfers/21 Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. Jon Kyl, The Central Arizona Project, in NEW SOURCES OF WATER FOR ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH: INTERBASIN TRANSFERS (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 1982). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Havasu Canyon Watershed Rapid Watershed Assessment Report June, 2010
    Havasu Canyon Watershed Rapid Watershed Assessment Report June, 2010 Prepared by: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service University of Arizona, Water Resources Research Center In cooperation with: Coconino Natural Resource Conservation District Arizona Department of Agriculture Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Arizona Department of Water Resources Arizona Game & Fish Department Arizona State Land Department USDA Forest Service USDA Bureau of Land Management Released by: Sharon Megdal David L. McKay Director State Conservationist University of Arizona United States Department of Agriculture Water Resources Research Center Natural Resources Conservation Service Principle Investigators: Dino DeSimone – NRCS, Phoenix Keith Larson – NRCS, Phoenix Kristine Uhlman – Water Resources Research Center Terry Sprouse – Water Resources Research Center Phil Guertin – School of Natural Resources The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disa bility, po litica l be lie fs, sexua l or ien ta tion, an d mar ita l or fam ily s ta tus. (No t a ll prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal employment opportunity provider and employer. Havasu Canyon Watershed serve as a platform for conservation 15010004 program delivery, provide useful 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit information for development of NRCS Rapid Watershed Assessment and Conservation District business plans, and lay a foundation for future cooperative watershed planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of the Zuni Tribe, Zuni Reservation, Zuni, New Mexico
    CONSTITUTION OF THE ZUNI TRIBE ZUNI RESERVATION, ZUNI, NEW MEXICO PREAMBLE We, the members of the Zuni Tribe, Zuni Indian Reservation, New Mexico, in order to secure to us and to our posterity the political and civil rights guaranteed to us by treaties and by the Constitution and statutes of the United States; to secure educational advantage; to encourage good citizenship; to exercise the right of self-government; to administer both as a municipal body and as a proprietor of our tribal affairs; to utilize, increase and protect our tribal resources; to encourage and promote all movements and efforts leading to the general welfare of our tribe; to guarantee individual rights and freedom of religion; and to maintain our tribal customs and traditions; do ordain and establish this constitution. ARTICLE I – JURISDICTION The jurisdiction of the Zuni Tribe, Zuni Indian Reservation exercised through the Zuni Tribal Council, the Executive Department and the Judicial Department, acting in accordance with this constitution and the ordinances adopted in accordance herewith, shall extend to all tribal lands included within the present boundaries of the Zuni Indian Reservation and to such other lands as may hereafter be added thereto, unless otherwise provided by law. This jurisdiction shall apply to and be for the benefit and protection of all Indians who now, or may in the future, reside on the Zuni Reservation. The name of this organization shall be the Zuni Tribe. ARTICLE II – MEMBERSHIP Section 1. The membership of the Zuni Tribe, Zuni Indian Reservation, shall consist of the following: a. All persons enrolled on the Zuni Agency census roll of April 1, 1963; provided that the roll may be corrected at any time by the tribal council, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon
    ALT ALT To 389 To 389 To Jacob Lake, 89 To 89 K and South Rim a n a b Unpaved roads are impassable when wet. C Road closed r KAIBAB NATIONAL FOREST e in winter e K k L EA O N R O O B K NY O A E U C C N T E N C 67 I A H M N UT E Y SO N K O O A N House Rock Y N N A Buffalo Ranch B A KANAB PLATEAU C C E A L To St. George, Utah N B Y Kaibab Lodge R Mount Trumbull O A N KAIBAB M 8028ft De Motte C 2447m (USFS) O er GR C o Riv AN T PLATEAU K HUNDRED AND FIFTY MIL lorad ITE ap S NAVAJO E Co N eat C A s C Y RR C N O OW ree S k M INDIAN GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK B T Steamboat U Great Thumb Point Mountain C RESERVATION K 6749ft 7422ft U GREAT THUMB 2057m 2262m P Chikapanagi Point MESA C North Rim A 5889ft E N G Entrance Station 1795m M Y 1880ft FOSSIL R 8824ft O Mount Sinyala O U 573m G A k TUCKUP N 5434ft BAY Stanton Point e 2690m V re POINT 1656m 6311ft E U C SB T A C k 1924m I E e C N AT A e The Dome POINT A PL N r o L Y Holy Grail l 5486ft R EL Point Imperial C o Tuweep G W O Temple r 1672m PO N Nankoweap a p d H E o wea Mesa A L nko o V a Mooney D m N 6242ft A ID Mount Emma S Falls u 1903m U M n 7698ft i Havasu Falls h 2346m k TOROWEAP er C Navajo Falls GORGE S e v A Vista e i ITE r Kwagunt R VALLEY R N N Supai Falls A Encantada C iv o Y R nt Butte W d u e a O G g lor Supai 2159ft Unpaved roads are North Rim wa 6377ft r o N K h C Reservations required.
    [Show full text]
  • 4312-52 DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR National Park Service
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/23/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-23078, and on govinfo.gov 4312-52 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS-WASO-NAGPRA-NPS0029003; PPWOCRADN0-PCU00RP14.R50000] Notice of Inventory Completion: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Wupatki National Monument, Flagstaff, AZ AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Wupatki National Monument has completed an inventory of human remains, in consultation with the appropriate Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations, and has determined that there is no cultural affiliation between the human remains and any present-day Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations. Representatives of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control of these human remains should submit a written request to Wupatki National Monument. If no additional requestors come forward, transfer of control of the human remains to the Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations stated in this notice may proceed. DATES: Representatives of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control of these human remains should submit a written request with information in support of the request to Wupatki National Monument at the address in this notice by [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Kayci Cook Collins, Superintendent, Wupatki National Monument, 6400 N. Highway 89, Flagstaff, AZ 86004, telephone (928) 526-1157 ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Trips to the Geologic Past No. 4: Southern Zuni Mountains. Zuni
    SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST No. No. 1—Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1968 ($1.00). No. 2—Taos-Red River-Eagle Nest, New Mexico, Circle Drive 1968 ($1.00). No. 3—Roswell-Capitan-Ruidoso and Bottomless Lakes Park, New Mexico, 1967 ($1.00). No. 4—Southern Zuni Mountains, New Mexico, 1971 ($1.50). No. No. 5—Silver City-Santa Rita-Hurley, New Mexico, 1967 ($1.00). No. 6—Trail Guide to the Upper Pecos, New Mexico, 1967 ($1.50). No. 7—High Plains—Northeastern New Mexico, Raton-Capulin Mountain- Clayton, 1967 ($1.50). No. 8—Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History, 1967 ($1.50). No. 9—Albuquerque-Its Mountains, valley, Water, and Volcanoes, 1969 ($1.50). No. 10—Southwestern New Mexico, 1971 ($1.50). Cover: SHALAKO WARRIOR DOLL “Man-made highways and automobiles crisscross this world but hardly penetrate it…” J. FRANK DOBIE Apache Gold and Yaqui Silver SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 4 Southern Zuni Mountains Zuni-Cibola Trail BY ROY W. FOSTER PHOTOGRAPHS BY H. L. JAMES SKETCHES BY PATRICIA C. GICLAS 1971 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO 87801 NEW MEXICO STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES DON H. BAKER, JR., Director A Division of NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY STIRLING A. COLGATE, President THE REGENTS MEMBERS EX OFFICIO The Honorable Bruce King ...............................Governor of New Mexico Leonard DeLayo .............................Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS William G. Abbott .......................................................................... Hobbs Henry S. Birdseye ................................................................Albuquerque Ben Shantz ................................................................................Silver City Steve S.
    [Show full text]