arXiv:1612.06683v4 [cond-mat.str-el] 26 Oct 2017 h usprils n httefe nrycudb de- be could energy free by the scribed by that dominated and was quasiparticles, liquid the Fermi the of the physics low-energy and gas Fermi the the cles between in correspondence particles evolu- Fermi one-to-one free a smooth This in results transition. analyt- tion and phase any adiabatically Fermi liquid without the Fermi ically a gas, into Fermi on evolves turned non-interacting gas are a interactions in when prin- adiabatically that analytic as- states and adiabatic which second the ciple, A is theory energy. the Fermi of sumption the low-energy the near of particles space as- fermionic phase its places the on assumption and restrictions This extreme principle first statistics. The exclusion Fermi–Dirac Pauli theory. sociated liquid the Fermi as- is Landau are assumption in principles Lan- hold Several as to [1–3]. known sumed theory widely liquid become Fermi now liquids dau has Fermi which of physics metals, low-energy in the for theory logical momentum hr h energy the where Here, ∗ E † S radw fLna em iudter:rsrcin nth on restrictions theory: liquid Fermi Landau of Breakdown [email protected] [email protected] [ [ nte15s .P aduetbihdaphenomeno- a established Landau P. L. 1950s, the In n n = ] = ] nteFrilqi.Lna hnasmdta the that assumed then Landau liquid. Fermi the in ε k E − σ 0 k = B + k htpst htms uheape fucnetoa elect unconventional of examples t such Fermi-liquid most Landau that of posits paradigm that the beyond physics tronic h radw fLna em iud n lopoie gui a persp provides devices. also Our and and systems liquids view. Fermi electronic Landau of of point breakdown tr this the of from reach investigated the (iii) extensively beyond and physics symmetries, electronic unconventional emergent pr of new interaction-driven topolog (ii) by and breaking, or symmetries symmetry constraints system’s l external Fermi the by Landau to alized in connected electrons quantum deeply of are freedom of degrees the X k X δE δn k n spin and σ n hleg ncneprr odne atrpyisi t is physics matter condensed contemporary in challenge One σ k [ .INTRODUCTION I. ( n 2 σ ε n etrfrItricpiaySuis azo University Lanzhou Studies, Interdisciplinary for Center F ] E k (0) k σ steeeg faqaiatcewith quasiparticle a of energy the is [ [ σ n n δn = ] ln n entropy and ] k σ n 1 σ and , eateto hsc,Yna nvriy ati240,P 264005, Yantai University, Yantai Physics, of Department E k + σ [ n (1 + 2 1 ] − n k σ k X S T ; σ − k ′ = σ n [ ′ S n k f e [ ] σ k ( n , ε ln(1 ) σ, k r ie by given are ] σ k uhaSu Yuehua − ′ σ µ 1 ′ F δn − ) /T quasiparti- unu electrons quantum k n +1 σ k δn σ )) sthe is k 1, ′ . σ (1) ′ ∗ , n atoLu Hantao and t n oe ohrnra tts n v quantum (v) and criticality. states, quantum and normal transitions mother phase bulk novel superconductiv- the unconventional and of (iv) ity states, structure surface topological and metal–insulator novel (ii) the (iii) liquids, and transition, Luttinger localization these of 1D Anderson universal Some in electron (i) evident 19]. include: physics [18, systems electronic effects unconventional 2D Hall the and quantum 17], with [16, electrons superconductors Fe-based [12–15], tors nld novninlsprodciiy aiu novel various superconductivity, phenomena well- unconventional unexplained these include Such beyond formulations. remains established phenomena con- physical elec- unconventional classical tronic critical many of of corresponding description the the account phenomena, and good transitions phase a tinuous providing group renormalization [24] Wilson’s theory and sym- [23] spontaneous of breaking estab- theory well metry Landau’s been has despite 22] and [21, lished, effects Hall quantum the and riso o-nryLna em iud 4,including linear- [4], the surface, liquids Fermi Fermi well-defined Landau the low-energy of erties theory. to liquid Fermi assumed Landau are in interactions that involved is scattering be note forward to the point only particular A function. Fermi–Dirac adufradsatrn neatosaemarginal. are interactions the where scattering spaces, forward spatial Landau and 3D) two- and in liquids (2D Fermi three-dimensional Landau method of latter and stability the the [5] with showing theory [6], theory field group quantum renormalization The been using also sounds. reestablished has zero firmly theory the phenomenological and successful susceptibility, highly spin Pauli the rn ihAdro oaiain[0,hayfermion heavy high- [10], 11], localization [8, elec- Anderson superconductors disordered one- with [9], include liquids examples trons Luttinger Typical Fermi (1D) uncon- Landau 8]. dimensional of [7, the study framework beyond the liquid physics to turned electronic has ventional matter condensed of hl h hoybhn DLtigrlqis[,20] [9, liquids Luttinger 1D behind theory the While aduster a con o ayuieslprop- universal many for account can theory Landau’s ntels eea eae,mc teto ntefield the in attention much decades, several last the In cse i h olwn ehnss (i) mechanisms: following the via ocesses dtoa aduFrilqi hoyare theory liquid Fermi Landau aditional oi hsc tmfo etitoson restrictions from stem physics ronic otiiltplg.Vrosexamples Various topology. nontrivial cieyed ai ahast study to pathways basic yields ective er.Hr,w rsn perspective a present we Here, heory. azo 300 .R China R. P. 730000, Lanzhou , igpicpei h erhfrnovel for search the in principle ding ,teersrcin a hsb re- be thus can restrictions these y, qis ic h ere ffreedom of degrees the Since iquids. nesaducnetoa elec- unconventional understand o 2, † .China R. . ere ffedmof freedom of degrees e T c urt superconduc- cuprate T pcfi heat, specific 2 normal states, quantum phase transitions, and quantum II. BREAKDOWN OF LANDAU FERMI LIQUID criticality. THEORY: BASIC IDEAS In this article, we present a new perspective on un- conventional electronic physics beyond the paradigm of A. Degrees of freedom and basic principles traditional Landau Fermi liquid theory. Our perspec- tive is that most such unconventional electronic physics A degree of freedom is an independent physical vari- stems from the restriction of the degrees of freedom of able in the formal description of the state of a physical the quantum electrons in Landau Fermi liquids. The system, which describes its independent “motion”.1 For degrees of freedom describe the independent “motions” example, a classical electron with mass m and charge −e of quantum electrons and can be defined by a complete is described by its position (r) and momentum (p) vari- set of commuting observables that are deeply related to ables, which are functions of the absolute time parameter the symmetries of the quantum electrons. The degrees t. Thus, {r(t), p(t)} are the degrees of freedom of a clas- of freedom may also involve the nontrivial topological sical electron. In contrast, in the quantum electron case, structure of the quantum electronic states, and thus, the the basic variables are quantum states and these states degrees of freedom are deeply connected to both the sym- are defined in Hilbert space. Any quantum state in the metry and the topology of the system. This leads us nat- Hilbert space can be expressed as |Ψ(t)i = α ψα(t) |αi, urally to the following proposal: the restriction of the where |αi are the basis states of the HilbertP space, and degrees of freedom can be used to explain novel elec- ψα(t) ≡ hα|Ψ(t)i are quantum wavefunctions which can tronic physics beyond the standard Landau Fermi liquid be quantized to form quantum fields in second quantiza- theory, and such restrictions can be realized by external tion formalisms. Following Dirac [25], the basis states |αi constraints or by interaction-driven dynamical processes can be defined as the eigenfunctions of a complete set of via the mechanisms of (i) symmetry breaking, (ii) the commuting observables with their eigenvalues α being the emergence of new symmetries, and (iii) nontrivial topol- so-called quantum numbers. The degrees of freedom of a ogy. This perspective enables us to study the breakdown quantum electron (which describe its independent “mo- of Landau Fermi liquid theory via the restricted degrees tions”) can then be defined by the complete set of com- of freedom of the quantum electrons, and can also guide muting observables. Here, the commuting observables us in the search for novel electronic systems and devices whose eigenfunctions define the basis states play a similar through manual control of the electronic degrees of free- role to the independent variables which were introduced dom. to identify the classical physical states. Mathematically, The article is arranged as follows. In Section II, we the basis states |αi can be defined as the irreducible rep- show how to specify the quantum electronic states. This resentations of the symmetry group associated with the leads to the definition of the degrees of freedom of quan- quantum electron [26], while the complete set of commut- tum electrons, which physically, are deeply connected to ing observables can be constructed from the generators the symmetry and topology of the system. The princi- of the symmetry group, with the quantum numbers α be- ples governing the novel electronic physics are also pre- ing the indices of the irreducible representations. Thus, sented in this section. In the following sections, exten- the degrees of freedom of quantum electrons are deeply sive reviews of various examples of unconventional elec- connected to the overall symmetry, where in general, the tronic physics beyond the Landau Fermi liquid theory symmetry group involves the symmetries of the spatial- framework are provided from our perspective. Section temporal space (r,t), and of the internal spaces, such as III focuses on the restriction of the spatial degrees of the spin and phase spaces. freedom, which can result in critical phenomena, 1D uni- The quantum states of many-body quantum elec- versal Luttinger liquids, and impurity-induced Anderson trons can be similarly defined as Ψ(N)(t) = localization. Section IV considers the restriction of the ψα α ···α (t) |α1α2 ··· αN i, where |α1 α2 ··· αN i are Pαi 1 2 N internal degrees of freedom, such as the spin, charge, the N-body basis states, and ψα1α2···αN (t) ≡ phase, and local basis states, which can lead to quan- α α ··· α |Ψ(N)(t) are the N-body quantum wave- 1 2 N tum Hall effects, spin- and charge-density waves (SDWs ˆ† ˆ† ˆ† functions. Here, |α1α2 ··· αN i = ψα ··· ψα ψα |0i, and CDWs), Pomeranchuk nematicity, superconductiv- N 2 1 where the creation operators ψˆ† are the quantized ity, and Mott–Hubbard physics. Section V focuses on re- αi fermionic fields of the corresponding wavefunctions of the strictions imposed by external degrees of freedom, which i-th quantum electron. The degrees of freedom of the include the Goldstone bosons arising from continuous many-body quantum electrons can then be defined by the symmetry breaking, background fluctuations in Ander- collection of the complete set of commuting observables son’s hidden Fermi liquid, Bose unparticles in the strange of all the quantum electrons, with the eigenfunctions de- metallic state, and local magnetic moments in Kondo noted by the set of quantum numbers {α α ··· α }. As physics and heavy fermion superconductors. Finally, in 1 2 N Section VI, we present a summary of the possible causes of the breakdown of the Landau Fermi liquid framework in novel electronic physics, and suggest some proposals 1 for further research. From Wikipedia on the “degrees of freedom”. 3 before, they are deeply related to the governing symme- face. Essentially, only low-energy quasiparticles near the try group of the many-body quantum electrons. Fermi surface are involved in the physics of the Landau In some cases, the quantum states may have a global Fermi liquids. nontrivial topological structure that is out of reach of As discussed above, the Landau Fermi-liquid ground the usual symmetry-based description. Examples include state evolves adiabatically and analytically from a non- vortices, quantum Hall states [27, 28], and topological interacting Fermi gas [1, 4]. This can be described math- insulators [29–33]. In these cases, besides the degrees ematically as of freedom defined by the symmetry, to identify a quan- (FL) ˆ (FL) tum state we should also specify the nature of its global ΨG E = U ΨG,0 E , (2) topological structure. Thus, the topology of the system provides quantum electrons with an additional degree of where Ψ(FL) ≡ c† c† |0i is the ground state G,0 E |k|
The above discussion thus shows us how to define Lan- B. Analyticity of single-particle Green’s functions dau Fermi liquids from the perspective of the degrees of freedom. We are then naturally guided toward a new per- The central concept of Landau Fermi liquid the- spective that unconventional electronic physics beyond ory is that the low-energy physics is dominated by the Landau Fermi liquid theory framework can be in- fermionic quasiparticles that survive the Landau inter- duced by restricting the degrees of freedom of Landau actions and which have conserved quantum numbers. Fermi liquids. These restrictions can be implemented by Mathematically, the Landau quasiparticles can be de- modifying either the symmetry or the topology with the scribed by the single-particle Green’s function Gσ(k, τ)= assistance of external constraints or by interaction-driven † −hT c (τ)c (0)i, where τ denotes imaginary time and dynamical processes. In particular, we regard the topol- τ kσ kσ hAi = T r (ρ A) defines the ensemble average, where ρ ogy as a special global degree of freedom of the quantum H H is the density matrix. If the interactions turn on adi- states whose nontrivial topological structures may lead abatically without any phase transition, a perturbation to novel physics beyond traditional Landau Fermi liquid formalism can be established and the Dyson equation theory. The driving mechanisms for the unconventional yields electronic physics can then be summarized as follows: (i) symmetry breaking, (ii) new emergent symmetries, and 1 k (iii) nontrivial topology. Gσ( ,iωn)= (0) , (7) iωn − εkσ − Σσ(k,iωn) Indeed, Landau’s principle of spontaneous symmetry breaking is a universal mechanism [23] that can be used where Σσ(k,iωn) is the self-energy. to break down the traditional Landau Fermi liquid the- In the case of Landau Fermi liquids, the single- ory. Microscopically, the large number of near-zero en- particle Green’s function can be separated into coher- (coh) ergy collective fluctuations lead to the instability of the ent and incoherent parts, Gσ(k,iωn) = Gσ (k,iωn)+ Landau Fermi liquid phase, which then undergoes a spon- (inc) Gσ (k,iωn), where at low energies the coherent part taneous symmetry breaking phase transition. Accompa- follows nying the phase transition, a new macroscopic degree of freedom emerges, the so-called order parameter, whose (coh) Zkσ Gσ (k,iωn)= . (8) value is zero in the normal state and which becomes finite iωn − εkσ − iΓσ(k,iωn) in the ordered phase. In comparison to the Landau Fermi liquid phase, the ground state of the ordered phase ex- (0) Here, εkσ = εkσ + ℜΣσ(k,εkσ) and Γσ(k,iωn) = hibits a reduced number of symmetries. Examples of such −1 ∂ℜΣ symmetry breaking phase transitions include the SDW, ZkσℑΣσ(k,iωn) with Zkσ = 1 − . In ∂ωn iωn=εkσ CDW, or superconducting (SC) phase transitions. In the order to separate the coherent part of the Green’s func- SDW phase transition, both the spatial translational and tion from the incoherent part, the self-energy near the SU(2) spin symmetries are broken, while in the CDW Fermi energy is assumed to be analytic. phase transition, the spatial translational symmetry is (coh) k broken in the particle-hole charge channel. The SC phase One important property of Gσ ( ,z) is that in the unique pseudo-pole transition, on the other hand, is associated with the spon- complex z-plane, it has a whose cen- k taneous breaking of the charge U(1) symmetry. In all of ter is located at εkσ + iΓσ( ,εkσ). In the particular these three cases, however, the Landau quasiparticles are case where the energy is very close to the Fermi energy, k + gapped in the respective ordered phases. Γσ( ,εk) → 0 , the pseudo-pole becomes a pure pole. Zkσ is the residual weight of the corresponding pole. This As examples of the second driving mechanism, the single-pole structure describes a well-defined quasiparti- novel critical phenomena that manifests near the crit- cle, which is characterized by the energy εkσ, the life-time ical point of a continuous phase transition stem from 1/Γσ, and the coherent weight Zkσ. Moreover, the single- an emergent scaling symmetry, where lots of fluctua- pole structure of the single-particle Green’s function pro- tions within the divergent correlation length drive the duces a corresponding peak in the spectrum that can be power-law-dependent critical physics [24]. In the case observed by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. of 1D quantum electron systems, a conformal symmetry When this Landau quasiparticle description breaks emerges where infinite conservation laws with dramatic down, there are some features that may arise in the constraints lead to another class of universal states, the single-particle Green’s function which can be summarized so-called Luttinger liquids [9]. Similarly, a U(1) gauge as follows. symmetry is proposed to emerge in the case of Mott– 1. Nonanalytic self-energy with Zkσ → 0 [7]: Hubbard physics, where the spin and charge degrees of Although the Green’s function still follows the Dyson freedom are strongly correlated, which can lead to many equation (7), singular scatterings can also lead to a non- ωc novel physical phenomena beyond the standard Landau analytic self-energy, e.g., Σ(kF ,ω) ∼ ln ω + i|ω|, oc- Fermi liquid framework [15]. Examples of the nontrivial curring in the case of a marginal Fermi liquid [7, 36]. topology driving mechanism can be found in the quantum In such cases, the Landau quasiparticles near Fermi en- Hall effect [27, 28], and in topological insulators [29–33]. ergy lose their coherent weight and this typically leads 5 to the breakdown of the Landau quasiparticles in strong- emerge as the consequences of nontrivial topology in the coupling theories, such as in the study of electrons cou- quantum states. Despite the lack of symmetry breaking pled to spin fluctuations in high-Tc cuprate superconduc- or emergence of new symmetries in such systems, and tors [37]. although the bulk excitations may not be much different 2. Multipole singularities [9]: from the normal Landau Fermi liquids, these topologi- As an illustrative example, let us con- cal states of matter are beyond the reach of a traditional sider a SC mean-field state with Hamiltonian Landau Fermi liquid theory description. Moreover, in the † H = k ψk (εkτ3 + ∆kτ1) ψk, where τi are the case of interacting topologically nontrivial systems, the P † † interplay between interactions, symmetry, and topology Pauli matrices and ψ = c ,c−k↓ are Nambu spinor k k↑ can be much more complicated [33], and is clearly well be- operators. The single-particle Green’s function is then yond the standard Landau theory description. Therefore, given by we categorize these examples of novel physics beyond the αkσ βkσ Landau Fermi liquid theory framework as being driven by Gσ(k,iωn)= + , (9) nontrivial topology. iωn − Ek iωn + Ek
2 2 where Ek = εk + ∆k. Compared to the Green’s func- tion (8) for Landaup Fermi liquids, the Green’s function III. RESTRICTION OF SPATIAL DEGREES OF in the SC state has two separate poles, which are sym- FREEDOM metrically located on the two sides of the Fermi energy but with different coherent weights αkσ,βkσ. Physically, In this section, we review the effects of restricting the this implies that a Bogoliubov quasiparticle in the SC spatial degrees of freedom of quantum electrons. We state is the combination of a single particle and hole pair. consider how self-similarity and scaling symmetry at the Similarly, one can show that the single-particle Green’s critical point leads to anomalous dimensions and frac- function in the ordered SDW or CDW state also has two tal physics, and review how Fermi liquids in confined 1D separated singular poles. The change from the single- space have one stable fixed point, i.e., they form universal pole singularity structure of Landau Fermi liquids into Luttinger liquids. We also review how impurity-induced the multipole structure in the ordered state is another randomness can lead to Anderson localization and the route to the breakdown of the Landau quasiparticle de- Anderson metal–insulator phase transition. scription. We note that the Yang–Rice–Zhang Green’s function proposed for high-Tc cuprate superconductors also exhibits separated singular poles [38]. A. Self-similarity at a critical point: anomalous 3. Branch-cut singularities: dimensions and fractal physics Suppose the Green’s function follows The basic variable used to describe continuous phase A transitions is an order parameter φ(r), which has the Gσ(k,iωn)= 1−a , (10) (iωn − εkσ) value zero in the normal state and which becomes fi- nite when a spontaneous symmetry breaking induces the where the exponent (a 6= 0) describes the anomalous di- continuous phase transition [23]. In general, the order mension of the renormalized electrons. In this case, the parameter is an emergent macroscopic degree of free- analyticity of the Green’s function is essentially modified, dom of the continuous phase transition and near the since the single-pole singularity has been transformed critical point, lots of fluctuations of the order param- into a branch-cut one, indicating the breakdown of the eter within the divergent correlation length exhibit co- Landau quasiparticle description. This form of branch- operative critical behaviors. When this occurs, Landau cut singularity structure has been identified in several quasiparticles and their microscopic short-range interac- novel electron systems such as 1D Luttinger liquids [9], tions take on secondary roles and the electron system Fermi liquids in fractal space [39], Anderson’s Hidden assumes a critical state defined by a single universality Fermi liquid theory [40], and for electrons coupled to class [24, 42]. The divergent correlation length and emer- scale-invariant unparticles [41]. gent scaling symmetry at the critical point then lead to Some additional remarks might be useful to conclude singular power-law critical behavior of the thermodynam- this section. The breakdown of the Landau quasiparticle ical responses [43], and these singular critical behaviors description is a fundamental characteristic of the break- demonstrate self-similarity of the critical phenomena. down of the Landau Fermi liquid theory framework. Ac- The most unusual mystery of the critical phenomena is cordingly, substantial modifications of the single-particle the finite anomalous dimension η [42, 44], which appears Green’s function are evident when this breakdown oc- in the correlation function of the order parameter, curs, as discussed above. However, there are instances that may go beyond this scope, e.g., the integer quan- G(k) ∼ k−2+η, (11) tum Hall effect. In a more general sense, this may also be the case for topological insulators, where novel topologi- where G(k) = ddrhφ(r)φ(0)ieik·r. This finite anoma- cal features typified by edge excitations or surface states lous dimensionR stems from the novel correlation of the 6 low- and high-energy fluctuations and violates normal Thus, the 1D electrons are in the so-called universal Lut- dimensional analysis since the normal dimension of G(k) tinger liquid phase [20]. should be −2. In order to restore the correct normal di- In the language of the renormalization group, the Lut- mension of G, one can introduce a short-range length al tinger liquids have a universal low-energy fixed point, η −2+η so that G(k) ∼ al k . This insertion clearly demon- the solvable Luttinger model, where only the linear dis- strates the unusual role of short-range fluctuations in persion and the forward interactions are relevant and/or critical phenomena [44]. The coupling of electrons to marginal in the renormalization. The nonlinear disper- the critical collective fluctuations of the order parame- sion and backward and Umklapp scatterings only act to ter can lead to the anomalous dimension of the electrons renormalize the Fermi velocities and the effective cou- and the breakdown of the Landau quasiparticle descrip- pling constants, which are the essential quantities in the tion, in similar fashion to the case of electrons coupled definition of the universal properties of the solvable Lut- to scale-invariant unparticles [41]. tinger model [9, 20]. This self-similarity and finite anomalous dimension The universal properties of the solvable Luttinger provides us with a new perspective: the critical phe- model are as follows [9]: (i) the absence of low-energy nomena are specific cases of fractal physics. Near a Landau quasiparticles; (ii) anomalous dimensions of the critical phase transition with an emergent scaling sym- fermionic operators which produce non-universal power- metry, electrons are restricted into an effective fractal law correlations; (iii) spin–charge separation; and (iv) spatial space which is renormalized by the interactions universal relations among the non-universal exponents of and has an anomalous dimension. We note that the the correlation functions, and between the renormalized fractal nature of critical phenomena has also been pro- velocities and coupling constants. All of these universal posed previously [45, 46], and remark that the anoma- properties are deeply rooted to the underlying conformal lous dimension and fractal nature of critical phenomena symmetry which features explicitly in the bosonization have a deep relation to an underlying nonlinearity. Sup- of the Luttinger model. The infinite number of local pose that a physical variable A with a dimension d of conformal transformations lead to an infinite number of d the space (V ∼ L ) has a scale dimension ds = d − η conservation laws, which allows one to determine all the near a critical point. Under the scale transformation universal properties of the Luttinger model, while the l′ = bl, A becomes A′(L′) = b−(d−η)A(L). Thus, we anomalous dimensions of the operators and the expo- − d−η d η have A ∼ L ∼ V d , showing that the critical behav- nents of the power-law correlations are associated with ior of A is deeply related to nonlinear correlations. This the conformal dimensions of the primary fields [9]. is the nonlinear origin of the effective fractal dimension. The physical effects of fractal space have been stud- ied by Bares and Wen [39], for the case where the elec- C. Impurity-induced Anderson localization trons are confined in the spatial dimension 1
H = −U φ φ ′ S¯ · S¯ ′ , (14) B. Spontaneous symmetry breaking (I): SDW, I s X k k k k CDW, and Pomeranchuk instabilities kk′
σ ′ † σσ S¯ ′ ′ A Fermi surface is called nesting if a lot of Fermi- where k = σσ ckσ 2 ckσ , and Us is positive and P (c) surface points are connected by one special momentum larger than a critical value Us , a spin-dependent Pomer- and the Fermi surface features parallel regions. The anchuk Fermi surface deformation may occur. In contrast Fermi surface of a Landau Fermi liquid is unstable if it to the SDW and CDW Fermi surface instabilities that oc- exhibits nesting. With the spin magnetic susceptibility cur for finite momentum Q, the Pomeranchuk Fermi sur- defined as χs(q, τ)= −hTτ Sq(τ) · S−q(0)i and the SDW face deformation can be regarded as a zero-momentum operator Sq defined as in Eq. (6), Fermi surface nesting instability. can lead to the divergence of the static spin susceptibil- The Pomeranchuk Fermi surface deformation is a par- ity, i.e., χ (Q,ω) → +∞, where Q is the character- ticular manifestation of electronic nematicity and breaks s ω=0 istic nesting momentum. This divergence indicates the the rotational symmetry of the system [64]. Thus, the instability of the Fermi surface in the spin channel. Sim- Pomeranchuk–Landau interactions (13) and (14) can ilarly, a Fermi-surface instability can also occur in the drive a phase transition that spontaneously breaks the charge channel. With the CDW operator nq defined as rotational symmetry and thus result in an electronic in Eq. (5), we can define the charge density suscepti- nematic state with a finite nematic order parameter ¯ bility as χc(q, τ)= −hTτ nq(τ) · n−q(0)i, and the nesting khφkn¯ki or khφkSki. At the first glance, the elec- Fermi surface can also lead to the divergence of the static tronicP nematicP state appears to be normal, similar to 9 anisotropic Landau Fermi liquids; however, this is only a mentum Q = 0 (the momentum of the center of mass of superficial mean-field manifestation. The scattering in- Cooper pairs). It has been shown by Shankar’s renormal- teractions between the Landau quasiparticles and the ization group study that the SC instability is relevant to Goldstone nematic modes of the rotational symmetry Landau Fermi liquids, and that the SC state is a stable breaking mechanism can lead to unusual non-Fermi liquid fixed point of the electron liquid [6]. behavior of the self-energy of the Landau quasiparticles, and simultaneously, of the damped Goldstone nematic modes [64–66]. These novel scattering physical effects are D. Gutzwiller projection: Mott–Hubbard physics also preserved in the case of a nematic phase transition in a discrete crystal with rotational symmetry breaking, When the d- or f-electron shells of ions are not where it is found that the discrete lattice effects are ir- fully filled, strong residual on-site Coulomb interactions relevant over most of the temperature range [65]. Thus, known as Mott–Hubbard interactions can heavily sup- the electronic nematic state is another example of a non- press on-site double occupations. The relevant physics of Fermi liquid state. Further novel physics associated with such systems can be described by the Hubbard model and nematic criticality and non-Fermi liquid physics also oc- involves both kinetic electron hopping terms and their curs near the critical point of a nematic phase transi- on-site Mott–Hubbard interactions. The strong suppres- tion [64, 65, 67]. sion of on-site double occupations can be described by the Gutzwiller projection [72] C. Spontaneous symmetry breaking (II): P = (1 − αn n ) . (16) Superconductivity Y i↑ i↓ i
Landau Fermi liquids have a global charge U(1) sym- Generally, one takes 0 ≤ α ≤ 1 with α = 0 (α = 1) metry under phase transformations of the form ciσ → iθ expressing the absence of the reduction (exact exclusion) ciσe , which implies the conservation of the particle of on-site double occupations. The Gutzwiller projec- number. When the global charge U(1) symmetry is bro- tion is thus a restriction on the local basis states of the ken, Landau Fermi liquids transform into a SC state fol- Hilbert space, where the local on-site doubly-occupied lowing a phase transition in which the superconductivity basis states are reduced or even completely removed. emerges. In particular, the Gutzwiller projection can lead to In the SC state, the SC order parameter a Mott–Hubbard metal–insulator phase transition when † † the d- or f-electron shells are half-filled. When vir- ′ ∆= ∆σσ (k)ckσc−kσ′ (15) X′ tual hopping processes are included, one then finds that b kσσ there are effective low-energy super-exchange antiferro- has a finite average value, and neglecting spin-orbit cou- magnetic interactions, and as a result, a Mott–Hubbard pling, we can decouple the spin part into its spin singlet insulator can show long-range antiferromagnetic order in and spin triplet components. In the spin singlet SC state, quasi-2D or 3D compounds at low temperatures. When ′ additional electrons or holes are introduced into such ∆σσ (k) = [−iΛ(k)σ2]σσ′ with Λ(−k) = Λ(k), while ′ σ half-filled compounds, the long-range antiferromagnetic in the spin triplet state, ∆σσ (k) = [−i (d(k) · ) σ2]σσ′ with d(−k) = −d(k) [68]. The finite pairing order pa- order is gradually broken and the system evolves into a rameter reflects the macroscopic condensation of Cooper spin-liquid or spin-glass state. Moreover, superconduc- pairs, where this macroscopic condensation stems from tivity can occur when the motion of the doped electrons the fixed phase of the Cooper pairs which contribute or holes becomes coherent. coherently to the whole condensate. Collective phase In 1987, Anderson proposed the resonating valence modes and amplitude modes can then be found over the bond (RVB) scenario to describe the superconductivity of Cooper pair condensate ground state, and on account of hole-doped high-Tc cuprate superconductors [73], where the coupling of the charged superconductor to electro- the Gutzwiller projection plays a key role in the descrip- magnetic gauge fields, the longitudinal phase modes be- tion of their low-energy physics. In this account, the come high-energy plasmon modes [69]. One well-known superconductivity emerges when the holes exhibit coher- example of such transverse and topological phase modes ent motion in the RVB spin-liquid background, and thus are vortices, while the amplitude modes of the SC con- form a novel non-Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (non-BCS) densate, known as SC Higgs modes [70, 71], are still be- mechanism for the superconductivity. Anderson’s RVB ing sought for in experiments. As mentioned in Sec. II B, proposal has been extensively studied by many analytical the Landau quasiparticles are gapped in the SC state and and numerical methods, where in order to deal with the their single-particle Green’s functions exhibit a double- local Gutzwiller projection, a U(1) gauge theory [15] is † pole singularity. established with the electron operator ciσ reformulated We note that the SC state can also be regarded as an as example of the low-energy Fermi-surface nesting insta- † † bility in the particle-particle channels with nesting mo- ciσ = fiσbi, (17) 10 and where the spin and the charge degrees of freedom of marginal and Landau Fermi liquids are thus stable [6]. the electrons are separately carried by spinons fiσ and In this section, we will discuss electron systems that are holons bi, respectively. This decoupling is based upon coupled to external degrees of freedom. The models we an assumption that the Landau quasiparticles are not will consider for review include electrons coupled to Gold- well-defined in Mott–Hubbard physics, but rather related stone bosons, Anderson’s hidden Fermi liquid, electrons to spin–charge separation. There is then an emergent coupled to scale-invariant unparticles, and Kondo physics U(1) gauge symmetry with one additional gauge degree and heavy fermion superconductors where the electrons of freedom that leads to strong correlations between the are coupled to local magnetic moments. spinons and the holons. Novel physics such as non-BCS superconductivity, the pseudogap, and the strange metal- lic state (among other examples) can then arise. We note that there are various different gauge theories proposed for the Gutzwiller projection constraint with similar as- A. Electrons coupled to Goldstone bosons: sumptions and similar outputs. However, the brilliant Watanabe–Vishwanath theorem RVB proposal and the various proposed gauge theories are still in doubt, as the predicted spinons and holons Recently, Watanabe and Vishwanath outlined a theo- have not been found in experiments. rem for the stability of Landau Fermi liquid behavior and Mott–Hubbard physics has also been extensively stud- Goldstone bosons in metals exhibiting spontaneous sym- ied by wavefunction Gutzwiller projection methods [74, metry breaking [66]. In the case of a continuous phase 75]. In such descriptions, the Gutzwiller projected state transition with spontaneous symmetry breaking, we may is defined as ΨiP = P Φ0i, where Φ0i is a non- define generators {Q } which are associated with the a interacting Fermi gas or a mean-field BCS SC state. The Goldstone modes. We then consider the commutation Gutzwiller projected Fermi gas turns out to be a renor- relations malized Fermi liquid [74], while the Gutzwiller projected BCS state is a renormalized BCS state [75–77], both of which have quasiparticle excitations with finite coherent [Qa, Pi]= iΛai, (18) weight. These results are in stark contrast to the origi- nal Anderson’s RVB scenario where the electrons should where Pi is the i-th component of the momentum be in non-Fermi liquid states and exhibit spin–charge P. IfΛai = 0, the coupling between the electrons separation. Whether such coherent Landau quasiparti- and the Goldstone modes vanishes in the limit of the cles can survive the strong Mott–Hubbard interactions small energy–momentum transfer, while if Λai 6= 0, and the question of how the unconventional superconduc- the electron–Goldstone-boson coupling does not vanish. tivity emerges from the pseudogap state or the strange Since vanishing coupling preserves the stability of the metallic state are still big puzzles in the modern field of Landau Fermi liquid and the Goldstone modes, a non- condensed matter. vanishing coupling may lead to novel non-Fermi liquid The key role, however, of Mott–Hubbard interactions behavior and the breakdown of the Goldstone modes. is their reduction of on-site double occupations. This re- The Watanabe–Vishwanath theorem thus shows scatter- duction is thus a restriction of the local basis states of the ing restriction effects on Landau Fermi liquids from the Hilbert space and obviously breaks the Pauli exclusion collective modes in the channel of the spontaneous sym- principle of the Landau quasiparticles. This restriction metry breaking. may then lead to strong correlations between the spin According to the theorem, since the coupling between and the charge degrees of freedom, such as those driven the electrons and the phonons in crystal compounds van- by strong U(1) gauge fluctuations, as proposed in U(1) ishes at small momentum transfer, both the Landau gauge theory [15]. Since the Pauli exclusion principle is Fermi liquid states and the phonons are stable. This a fundamental principle associated with the Fermi–Dirac is similar to when electron–magnon coupling vanishes in statistics of Landau quasiparticles, the breaking of the lo- ferromagnetic metals, in which case the magnons are cal Pauli exclusion principle may break the Fermi–Dirac stable. Generally speaking, all Goldstone modes as- statistics of the Landau quasiparticles and consequently sociated with internal symmetry breaking are stable; lead to novel excitations with emergent new statistics. however, nonvanishing coupling between electrons and Goldstone nematic modes arising from spontaneous ro- tational symmetry breaking may lead to non-Fermi liq- V. RESTRICTION OF EXTERNAL DEGREES uid physics and overdamped Goldstone nematic modes. OF FREEDOM Non-Fermi liquids exhibiting rotational symmetry break- ing are thus subject to extensive study [64–66, 78]. We As alluded to earlier in this manuscript, Landau Fermi note also that the coupling between electrons and trans- liquids only involve forward scattering Landau interac- verse gauge bosons does not vanish, which can lead to tions, while renormalization group studies have shown novel non-Fermi liquid behavior at extremely low tem- that the Landau forward scattering interactions are peratures [66, 79]. 11
B. Anderson’s hidden Fermi liquid which have scale-invariant features. These unparticles have novel propagators Recently, Anderson proposed a hidden Fermi-liquid 1 theory for the high-Tc cuprate superconductors [40, 80]. Dµ (q,νn)= , (22) 2 2 1−α For the projected t–J model with Hamiltonian H , there ν + Eq tJ n is a one-to-one correspondence between the exact eigen- states Ψi and the unprojected states Φi, i.e., where the exponent α = 1 − d+1 + d , d is the spa- 2 µ tial dimension, and dµ is the scaling dimension of the Ψi = P Φi, (19) unparticle field. Since the Green’s function of the un-
particles exhibits a branch-cut singularity rather than a where P is the Gutzwiller projection with exact exclu- general pole singularity, these unparticles are not gen- sion of the double occupations defined in (16). It can erally well-defined bosons. It can be shown that at low be shown that if HtJ Ψi = E Ψi, then HtJ Φi = E Φi. temperatures and energies, the scattering from the scale-
Φi describes the non-interacting Fermi-gas states or the invariant unparticles leads to non-Fermi liquid behavior
† † † of the electron self-energy, mean-field BCS states. Sincec ˆiσ ≡PciσP = ciσ(1−niσ¯ ), the single-particle Green’s function of the ground state d−2+2α d−2+2α G (t)= −ihΨ T c (t)c† (0) Ψ i can be simplified to ℑΣ ∼ T , ω . (23) ij G t iσ jσ G
⋆ The role of these scale-invariant unparticles is to in- G (t) ∼ G(0)(t)G( )(t), (20) ij ij ij troduce unusual scattering restrictions on the electrons in the particle–hole charge channel. Physically, these where G(0)(t) = −ihΦ c (t)c† (0) Φ i describes the ij G iσ jσ G bosonic unparticles with scale-invariant features may free electron propagation, and G(⋆) (t) = hΦ T (1 − arise from the high-energy degrees of freedom of the elec- ij G t n )(t)(1 − n )(0) Φ i describes the background fluctu- trons, and contribute to the scaling-invariant critical-like iσ¯ jσ¯ G ations scatterings off the quasiparticles. Ψ i and Φ i physics. The branch-cut singularity in the unparticle G G propagator then plays a similar role to the power-law are the correlated ground states defined by (19). With this simplification, Anderson showed that [40] Coulomb interaction in fractal space [39] in the forma- tion of the non-Fermi liquid behaviors. 1 G(k,ω) ∼ , (21) (ω − v k)1−a F D. Conduction electrons coupled to local moments: Kondo effects and heavy fermions where vF is the Fermi velocity. The finite exponent a describes the anomalous dimension of the electron oper- ators arising from the singular background scatterings, When conduction electrons are coupled to local mag- and has a dramatic effect since it leads to a branch- netic impurities or local f-electrons, novel physics can cut singularity in the single-particle Green’s function, an emerge, such as in the case of universal Kondo effects and obvious characteristic of the breakdown of the Landau heavy fermions with unconventional superconductivity. quasiparticles. Physically, the breakdown of the Landau When magnetic impurities are introduced into a metal- quasiparticles originates from the novel scattering effects lic conductor, certain universal Kondo effects beyond the of the background fluctuations, which are deeply related Landau Fermi-liquid theory can arise [82], including: (i) a to the on-site double occupation constraint. In similar resistivity minimum, (ii) universality of the specific heat 1 T fashion to our previous discussion in Sec. IV D, this may CV ∼ fc , and (iii) universality of the resistiv- be deeply rooted in an underlying emergent gauge sym- T TK T ity ρ(T ) ∼ fρ . The Kondo temperature TK is metry, as proposed in the RVB scenario [15] and in the TK breakdown of the Fermi–Dirac statistics. We note that the unique characteristic energy scale for the universal the hidden Fermi liquid scenario for high-Tc cuprate su- Kondo effects, and the universal Kondo effects outlined perconductors can also be extended to describe 2D elec- above can be described by the Kondo-impurity model, trons with quantum Hall effects [81]. σ ′ † † σσ H = εkc ckσ + J c ci σ′ · Sf , (24) X kσ X i0σ 2 0 kσ σσ′ C. Electrons coupled to unparticles where {c,c†} are the operators of the conduction elec- Limtragool et al. have introduced a phenomenolog- trons and Sf is the impurity spin located at site i0. Such ical model to describe the power-law singular behavior Kondo effects result from the universal physics of the of the strange metallic state of high-Tc cuprate super- Kondo resonance stemming from the local coupling of conductors [41]. They attribute the power-law behavior the conduction electrons to the magnetic impurity. It to scale-invariant critical physics whose generation in- should be noted that the Kondo coupling J has a dra- volves the coupling of electrons to bosonic unparticles matic character known as asymptotically free behavior, 12 i.e., its renormalized value is small at high energy but quantum phase transitions and associated quantum crit- is large at low energy [83]. This shows that the Kondo icality, as exhibited in most heavy fermion superconduc- resonance is a particular instance of criticality. tors [8, 11, 88]. When the local magnetic moments form a crystalline lattice configuration, such as for f-electrons in heavy fermion superconductors, a more suitable model for their VI. SUMMARY AND PROPOSALS description is the Kondo-lattice model,
σ ′ † † σσ A. Summary H = εkc ck + J c c ′ · S . (25) X kσ σ X iσ 2 iσ f,i kσ iσσ′ In the last several decades, many strongly correlated One special feature of the unconventional physics in electron systems have been discovered in experiments, heavy fermion superconductors is the emergence of heavy which clearly reveal unconventional electronic physics be- ⋆ fermions with a heavily renormalized mass (m /m ∼ yond the traditional Landau Fermi-liquid theory. A ma- 200). Physically, these heavy fermions are analogues of jor challenge in the modern field of condensed matter the Kondo resonance and form a nearly flat band near is to establish suitable theories to understand these un- the Fermi energy. conventional electronic phenomena. In this article, we Both the Kondo resonance and heavy fermions can be have presented a new perspective regarding such uncon- regarded as composite fermions arising from the binding ventional electronic physics that provides us with basic of the conduction electrons and the spin-flip scattering of means of studying the breakdown of the Landau Fermi local magnetic moments. Mathematically, the composite liquid theory, and which serves as a guideline for achiev- fermions can be defined by [82] ing manual control of electrons for novel physics. ′ ′ ′ In this article, we firstly reviewed the essential proper- σ S ′ ′ ( · f,i(t))σσ ciσ (t ) → ∆(t − t )fiσ(t ), (26) ties of Landau Fermi liquids: Landau Fermi liquids con- X′ σ nect adiabatically and analytically to a non-interacting where fiσ is the operator of the composite fermions, and Fermi gas, their ground state preserves all the symmetries ∆(t−t′) is the analogue of the Cooper pair wavefunction. of the system, and their low-energy physics is dominated These composite fermions are spatially localized but are by Landau fermionic quasiparticles with conserved quan- strongly correlated in dynamic processes [84], and highly tum numbers and whose dynamical properties are renor- nonlocal in the temporal space, thus forming local Fermi malized by Landau forward scattering interactions [1, 4]. liquids [85]. In this scenario, the Kondo resonance and We then presented our perspective that most examples the heavy fermions can be regarded as emergent com- of unconventional electronic physics beyond the Landau posite fermions resulting from the Kondo-coupling driven Fermi-liquid theory paradigm stem from the restriction time correlations between the conduction electrons and of the degrees of freedom of the quantum electrons in the local magnetic moments. Landau Fermi liquids. Since the degrees of freedom of While the Kondo effects of the magnetic impurity in- the quantum electrons correspond to independent “mo- duced Kondo resonance are well understood, the com- tions” that can be used to identify the quantum states, plex correlations of heavy fermions are far beyond our they can be defined by a complete set of commuting ob- knowledge. One central problem in the description of servables. As a complete set of commuting observables heavy fermion superconductors is the dynamical creation can be constructed in terms of the symmetry group of and destruction of heavy fermions. Physically, this prob- the quantum electrons, the degrees of freedom are thus lem is equivalent to the localization and delocalization deeply connected to the symmetry. In addition to the of the f-electrons which are hybridized strongly with degrees of freedom defined by symmetry, another degree the conduction electrons. These central problems in- of freedom that may be required to identify the quantum volve the competition of the Kondo liquid of the heavy states is the global topology, which can be out of reach fermions and the spin liquid of the local moments, where of the symmetry-based description and which can have the former involves local Kondo couplings and the lat- significant physical consequences. With these results, we ter involves Ruderman–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida (RKKY) were naturally led to propose that unconventional elec- interactions between the local moments. A simple phe- tronic physics can be realized by the restriction of the nomenological two-fluid model has been proposed to ac- degrees of freedom of the quantum electrons in Landau count for the basic physics of heavy fermion superconduc- Fermi liquids via the following mechanisms: (i) symme- tors [86, 87]; however, the driving mechanisms for the try breaking, (ii) the emergence of new symmetry, and complex competing physics are still little known. Ex- (iii) nontrivial topology. amples of such competing physics include phase tran- We then extensively reviewed various unconventional sitions between the Fermi-liquid and non-Fermi-liquid electronic physics beyond the Landau Fermi liquid theory states of heavy fermions, the heavy fermion Kondo liq- framework from our perspective. The considered exam- uid, the spin liquid, and the ordered magnetic state of ples of novel electronic physics arising from the restriction the local moments. A particular challenge in contem- of the degrees of freedom of electrons in Landau Fermi porary condensed matter physics is to understand such liquids are summarized in Table (I). Novel physics arising 13
TABLE I. Novel electronic physics arising from the restriction of the degrees of freedom (DOF) of Landau Fermi liquids. Notation and abbreviations are defined as follows: B/I space – spatial–temporal/internal space, r- or t-space, H – Hilbert space, sym. – symmetry, emgt. – emergent, brk. – breaking, stats. – statistics, ST – spatial translational, FD – Fermi–Dirac. novel physics DOF B/I space symmetry or topology critical phenomena scale B (r) emgt. scaling sym. Luttinger liquids dimension B (r) emgt. conformal sym. Anderson localization translation B (r) STsym.brk. QHE topology I (H ) emgt. nontrivial topology SDW translation & spin B (r)&I(spin) STandspin SU(2) sym. brk. CDW translation & charge B (r) & I (charge) ST sym. brk. in charge channel Pomeranchuk rotation & spin/charge B (r) & I (spin/charge) rotational sym. brk. in spin/charge channel SC U(1) phase I (phase) charge U(1) sym. brk. Mott–Hubbard physics double occupations I (H ) emgt. gauge sym., FD stats. brk. electrons with Goldstone modes B (r)&I sym.brk. Goldstone modes hidden Fermi liquid double occupations I (H ) emgt. gauge sym. (underlying) electrons with unparticles I (charge) scale invariance of unparticles unparticles electrons with local moments B (r,t) & I (spin) emgt. FD stats. of composite fermions local moments from the restriction of spatial degrees of freedom include Hall effects occur when confined 2D electrons are sub- anomalous dimensions and critical phenomena, Luttinger jected to a strong magnetic field, and the quantization of liquids, and Anderson localization. The anomalous di- the Hall conductance stems from the nontrivial topolog- mensions of critical phenomena near critical points stem ical structure of the quantum states [27, 28]. In particu- from an emergent scaling symmetry [24, 42], where lots of lar, highly topologically nontrivial features emerge in the fluctuations within the divergent correlation length lead FQHE case when electron–electron interactions are prop- to singular power-law critical behavior. The values of erly taken into account for partially filled Landau lev- the critical exponents are deeply connected to the scale- els. We then noted that when the Fermi surface exhibits invariant transformations and the anomalous dimensions nesting, finite interactions at the nesting momentum can exhibited in these systems implies the fractal nature of drive SDW or CDW phase transitions in the particle– the critical phenomena, and moreover, that the electrons hole spin or charge channels. In the case of a SDW phase are restricted to an effectively fractal space. In the sec- transition, both the spatial translational symmetry and ond example we considered, confinement of the quan- the spin SU(2) symmetry are broken, while in the CDW tum electrons in 1D spatial space results in the formation phase transition case, the spatial translational symmetry of 1D Luttinger liquids [20], whose universal low-energy is broken in the charge channel. Moreover, we highlighted physics stems from an underlying conformal symmetry of that the ground state of the SDW or CDW ordered state the solvable Luttinger model, i.e., a stable fixed point of has less symmetry than the normal Fermi-liquid state, Luttinger liquids. The underlying conformal symmetry and that the SDW or CDW Goldstone excitations are (with the associated infinitely many conservation laws) gapless while the Landau quasiparticles are gapped. The plays a crucial role in determining the universal prop- next example we considered was when the rotational erties of the 1D Luttinger liquids [9]. The third exam- symmetry of Landau Fermi liquids is broken, in which ple we reviewed was Anderson localization, which arises case a Pomeranchuk nematic phase transition will occur from impurity-induced randomness which breaks the spa- in the spin or charge channels, accompanied by a Pomer- tial translational symmetry [47, 48]. We note that in anchuk Fermi-surface deformation [35, 64]. Interactions the weak localization scenario, Anderson localization is between the Landau quasiparticles and the Goldstone argued to result from the quantum interference of the nematic modes have unusual influences which can lead backscattering processes which are preserved by time- to non-Fermi liquid behavior and overdamped Goldstone reversal symmetry [51, 52]. nematic modes. In the SC case, if the global charge U(1) Next, we considered examples where the internal de- symmetry of the Landau Fermi liquids is broken, there is grees of freedom are restricted, including the integer and macroscopic condensation of Cooper pairs and supercon- fractional quantum Hall effects; spontaneous symmetry ductivity emerges. We highlight the point that in each of breaking with SDW, CDW, Pomeranchuk, and SC phase the above examples of phase transitions with spontaneous transitions; and Mott–Hubbard physics. The quantum symmetry breaking, new macroscopic degrees of freedom 14
(the so-called order parameters) emerge. We then turned degree of freedom stems from the reconciliation of quan- our attention to Mott–Hubbard physics, which is deeply tum mechanics and the special theory of relativity, the related to the Gutzwiller constraint of strong suppression most fundamental spin-relevant interactions are defined of on-site double occupations. This is a constraint on the as [25] local Hilbert space which can lead to novel correlations between the spin and charge degrees of freedom. In order σ · (p + eA) . (27) to explain such non-Fermi liquid behavior, an emergent σ p U(1) gauge symmetry was proposed in Anderson’s RVB Thus, we have two fundamental couplings for spin, · which is the origin of the so-called spin-orbit couplings, scenario, providing an additional U(1) gauge degree of σ A freedom [15]. The strong suppression of on-site double and · which defines the coupling of the spin to electro- magnetic gauge fields. These fundamental interactions occupations breaks the Pauli principle and thus leads to the breakdown of the Landau quasiparticles with Fermi– guide us in how to detect and manually control the given degree of freedom of the particles. Moreover, focusing Dirac statistics description. on the degrees of freedom of the particles can reveal ba- Finally, we reviewed examples where unconventional sic relevant scattering processes, and consequently, some electronic physics can arise from the restriction of ex- basic physical properties. However, it should be noted ternal degrees of freedom, such as in the case of Gold- that there may be other interactions beyond the fun- stone modes and continuous symmetry breaking, the damental ones. For example, in the case of spin, the background fluctuations of Anderson’s hidden Fermi liq- direct- and super-exchange spin–spin interactions come uid, unparticles with scale-invariant features, and local from Coulomb interactions and virtual hopping processes moments in Kondo physics and heavy fermion super- due to large on-site Hubbard interactions, respectively. conductors. We saw that if the generator of the bro- Nevertheless, since the degrees of freedom of quantum ken continuous symmetry does not commute with the electrons are deeply connected to the overall symmetry momentum operator, interactions between the Landau and topology, we may take our guiding principles for the quasiparticles and the Goldstone modes will lead to the description of novel electronic physics to be as follows: breakdown of the Landau Fermi liquid and overdamped (i) to specify what the symmetry and topology imply Goldstone modes [66]. In the Anderson’s hidden Fermi for a given degree of freedom and to study the relevant liquid case [40, 80], the Gutzwiller constraint on on-site symmetry breaking, emergent symmetry, or nontrivial double occupations is simplified by scattering effects of topology in detail; (ii) to specify what the interactions the background fluctuations, which leads to the singular imply for a given degree of freedom and to study the rel- propagation of the electrons with anomalous dimension. evant interaction-driven physical properties; (iii) to spec- In the next example, unparticles with scale-invariant fea- ify the coupling between different degrees of freedom and tures were introduced to study the strange metallic state to study the relevant physical competition or coopera- of the high-T cuprate superconductors [41]. Their cou- c tion. pling to electrons was noted to lead to power-law non- In the case of the breakdown of the Landau Fermi liq- Fermi liquid behavior. In our final review, universal uid picture, since Landau Fermi liquids are protected by Kondo effects were seen to stem from the Kondo reso- three principal hypotheses—namely, (i) the Fermi–Dirac nance arising from the local coupling of the conduction statistics, (ii) the adiabatic and analytic principle, and electrons and magnetic impurities; however, the complex (iii) the quasiparticle-dominated low-energy physics—we competing physics accompanying quantum phase transi- can focus on further additional guidelines to account for tions and quantum criticality in heavy fermion supercon- the breakdown of their description: (i) How can the ductors remains beyond our knowledge. Such effects have Fermi–Dirac statistics of the Landau quasiparticles be been proposed [86, 87] to be deeply related to the dynam- broken? Which degrees of freedom are the most relevant ical creation and destruction of so-called heavy fermions to account for this breakdown? (ii) What are the possi- —being composite fermions formed by the coupling of ble phase transitions associated with each degree of free- conduction electrons and the local moments—along with dom? (iii) How can the Landau quasiparticles be broken the competition between the heavy fermion Kondo liquid down, e.g., causing the well-defined propagator of Lan- phase and the spin liquid of the local moments. dau quasiparticles to break down by the vanishing of the residual weight Zkσ, by the singular self-energy, or by an anomalous dimension and branch-cut singularity? (since B. Proposals the Landau interactions only involve forward scatterings, we can focus on interactions in other channels, backward In our study of the various examples of novel non-Fermi scattering, Umklapp scattering, or other singular scatter- liquid physics, we have focused on the degrees of freedom ings induced by collective fluctuations or external degrees of particles and taken the physical states as our starting of freedom), and (iv) To study the possible symmetry point. Since a degree of freedom of a particle defines breaking, new emergent symmetries, and/or nontrivial a special independent “motion” of its physical states, in topology of the degrees of freedom of the Landau Fermi principle, fundamental interactions dependent on this de- liquids involved. gree of freedom may be fixed. For example, since the spin This perspective on the restriction of the degrees of 15 freedom can also be taken as a guideline for the innova- deed be the case for a proper description of quantum tive design of electronic devices with novel physical prop- criticality. One of the most dramatic difficulties in the erties. In particular, we could manually control the elec- study of many unconventional electronic physical non- trons in artificial devices by manipulating any of the de- Fermi liquid systems is rooted in determining many-body grees of freedom, such as the spin, charge, phase, spatial correlations. The question of the basic variables and and temporal degrees of freedom, or the topology. Elec- study of the emergent degrees of freedom for many-body trons in a confined spatial space with nontrivial topology correlations are relevant problems for future studies. or with manually controlled artificial potentials may have Acknowledgements: We thank Tao Li and Yin Zhong unusual, interesting, and useful properties. A particular for helpful discussions. H.T. Lu acknowledges the sup- point to note, however, is that time may prove to be a port of the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant special parameter whose role has not been particularly No. 11474136). Y.H. Su was partially supported by well studied. Dynamical correlations and other possible the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. interaction-driving temporal restrictions may perhaps be 11774299) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shan- relevant to some non-Fermi liquid physics, and may in- dong Province (Grant No. ZR2017MA033).
[1] J. P. Landau, “The theory of a Fermi liquid,” Sov. Phys. Xiang, and Fu-Chun Zhang, “Iron based JETP 30, 1058–1064 (1956). high transition temperature superconductors,” [2] J. P. Landau, “Oscillations in a Fermi liquid,” Sov. Phys. National Science Review 1, 371–395 (2014). JETP 32, 59–66 (1957). [17] G. R. Stewart, “Superconductivity in iron compounds,” [3] J. P. Landau, “On the theory of the Fermi liquid,” Sov. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1589–1652 (2011). Phys. JETP 35, 97–103 (1958). [18] K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, “New [4] Piers Coleman, Introduction to Many Body Physics, method for high-accuracy determination of the fine- Chapter 6, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cam- structure constant based on quantized Hall resistance,” bridge, UK, 2015). Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494–497 (1980). [5] A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gor’kov, and I. Ye. Dzyaloshin- [19] D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, “Two- skii, Quantum Field Theoretical Methods in Statistical dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum Physics, 2nd ed. (Perpamon Press Ltd., 1965). limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559–1562 (1982). [6] R. Shankar, “Renormalization-group approach to inter- [20] F. D. M. Haldane, “Luttinger liquid theory of one- acting fermions,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 129–192 (1994). dimensional quantum fluids: I. properties of the Lut- [7] C. M. Varma, Z. Nussinovb, and W. van Saarloos, “Sin- tinger model and their extension to the general 1D inter- gular or non-Fermi liquids,” Phys. Rep. 361, 267–417 acting spinless Fermi gas,” J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. (2002). 14, 2585–2609 (1981). [8] G. R. Stewart, “Non-Fermi-liquid behavior in d- and f- [21] R. E. Prange, M. E. Cage, K. Klitzing, S. M. Girvin, A. electron metals,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 797–855 (2001). M. Chang, F. Duncan, M. Haldane, R. B. Laughlin, A. [9] J. Voit, “One-dimensional Fermi liquids,” Rep. Prog. M. M. Pruisken, and D. J. Thouless, The Quantum Hall Phys. 57, 977–1116 (1994). Effect, 2nd ed., edited by R. E. Prange and S. M. Girvin, [10] Elihu Abrahams, ed., Lecture Notes in 50 Years of An- Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer New derson Localization, 1st ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, York, 1990). 2010). [22] Jainendra K Jain, Composite Fermions, 1st ed. (Cam- [11] Piers Coleman, “Heavy fermions and the Kondo lattice: bridge University Press, 2007). a 21st century perspective,” in Lecture Notes for Autumn [23] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Part School on Correlated Electrons: Many-Body Physics: 1, 3rd ed., Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 5 (Bei- From Kondo to Hubbard (arXiv:1509.05769) (2015). jing World Publishing Corporation by arrangement with [12] B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, Betterworth-Heinemann, 1999). and J. Zaanen, “High temperature superconductivity in [24] K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, “The renormalization group the cuprates,” Nature (London) 518, 179–186 (2015). and the ǫ expansion,” Physics Report (Section C of [13] M. R. Norman, Novel Superfluids, p. 23-79 Physics Letters) 12, 75–200 (1974). (arXiv:1302.3176), 2nd ed., edited by K. H. Ben- [25] P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, nemann and J. B. Ketterson (Oxford University Press, 4th ed. (Science Press, 2008). Oxford, 2014). [26] Steven Weinberg, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics, 1st [14] P. W. Anderson, P. A. Lee, M. Randeria, T. M. Rice, ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2013). N. Trivedi, and F. C. Zhang, “The physics behind [27] D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightin- high-temperature superconducting cuprates: The “plain gale, and M. den Nijs, “Quantized Hall con- vanilla” version of RVB,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, ductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential,” R755–R769 (2004). Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405–408 (1982). [15] Patrick A. Lee, Naoto Nagaosa, and Xiao-Gang Wen, [28] Joseph E. Avron, Daniel Osadchy, and Ruedi Seiler, “A “Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature topological look at the quantum Hall effect,” Physics To- superconductivity,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17–85 (2006). day 56, 38–42 (2003). [16] X. H. Chen, P. C. Dai, D. L. Feng, Tao [29] Andreas P. Schnyder, Shinsei Ryu, Akira Furusaki, and 16
Andreas W. W. Ludwig, “Classification of topological Solid State Phys. 20, 3075–3102 (1987). insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimen- [51] D. Vollhardt and P. W¨olfle, “Diagrammatic, sions,” Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008). self-consistent treatment of the Anderson lo- [30] Alexei Kitaev, “Periodic table for topo- calization problem in d ≤ 2 dimensions,” logical insulators and superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B 22, 4666–4679 (1980). AIP Conf. Proc. 1134, 22–30 (2009). [52] D. Vollhardt and P. W¨olfle, “Scaling equations from [31] M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, “Colloquium : Topological a self-consistent theory of Anderson localization,” insulators,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010). Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 699–702 (1982). [32] Xiao-Liang Qi and Shou-Cheng Zhang, “Topo- [53] R. Abou-Chacra, P. W. Anderson, and D. J. Thouless, logical insulators and superconductors,” “A selfconsistent theory of localization,” J. Phys. C: Solid Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110 (2011). State Phys. 6, 1734–1752 (1973). [33] Ching-Kai Chiu, Jeffrey C. Y. Teo, Andreas P. [54] Ferdinand Evers and Alexander D. Mirlin, “Anderson Schnyder, and Shinsei Ryu, “Classification of transitions,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355–1417 (2008). topological quantum matter with symmetries,” [55] Wojciech De Roeck, Francois Huveneers, Markus M¨uller, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016). and Mauro Schiulaz, “Absence of many-body mobility [34] A. Zee, Group Theory in a Nutshell for Physicists, 1st edges,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 014203 (2016). ed. (Princeton University Press, 2016). [56] Xiaopeng Li, J. H. Pixley, Dong-Ling Deng, Sriram Gane- [35] I. Ia. Pomeranchuk, “On the stability of a Fermi liquid,” shan, and S. Das Sarma, “Quantum nonergodicity and Sov. Phys. JETP 8, 361–362 (1959). fermion localization in a system with a single-particle mo- [36] C. M. Varma, P. B. Littlewood, S. Schmitt-Rink, bility edge,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 184204 (2016). E. Abrahams, and A. E. Ruckenstein, “Phenomenology [57] N. David Mermin, “The topological theory of defects in of the normal state of Cu-O high-temperature supercon- ordered media,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 591–648 (1979). ductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1996–1999 (1989). [58] John Michael Kosterlitz and David James Thouless, [37] Andrey V. Chubukov, David Pines, and Joerg “Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two- Schmalian, The Physics of Conventional and Unconven- dimensional systems,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State tional Superconductors (arXiv:cond-mat/0201140), 1st Physics 6, 1181 (1973). ed., edited by K. H. Bennemann and J. B. Ketterson [59] J. E. Avron, R. Seiler, and B. Simon, “Homo- (Springer-Verlag, 2002). topy and quantization in condensed matter physics,” [38] Kai-Yu Yang, T. M. Rice, and Fu-Chun Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 51–53 (1983). “Phenomenological theory of the pseudogap state,” [60] R. B. Laughlin, “Anomalous quantum Hall effect: An Phys. Rev. B 73, 174501 (2006). incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged [39] P.-A. Bares and X.-G. Wen, “Breakdown of the excitations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395–1398 (1983). Fermi liquid due to long-range interactions,” [61] J. K. Jain, “Composite-fermion approach Phys. Rev. B 48, 8636–8650 (1993). for the fractional quantum Hall effect,” [40] P. W. Anderson, “Hidden Fermi liquid: The secret of Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 199–202 (1989). high-Tc cuprates,” Phys. Rev. B 78, 174505 (2008). [62] S. C. Zhang, T. H. Hansson, and S. Kivelson, “Effective- [41] Kridsanaphong Limtragool, Chandan Setty, Zhidong field-theory model for the fractional quantum Hall ef- Leong, and Philip W. Phillips, “Realizing infrared fect,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 82–85 (1989). power-law liquids in the cuprates from unparticle inter- [63] Chetan Nayak, Steven H. Simon, Ady Stern, Michael actions,” Phys. Rev. B 94, 235121 (2016). Freedman, and Sankar Das Sarma, “Non-abelian [42] Michael E. Fisher, “Renormalization group theory: anyons and topological quantum computation,” Its basis and formulation in statistical physics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083–1159 (2008). Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 653–681 (1998). [64] Eduardo Fradkin, Steven A. Kivelson, Michael J. [43] Shang-Keng Ma, Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena, Lawler, James P. Eisenstein, and Andrew P. Mackenzie, 1st ed., edited by David Pines, Avanced Book Progmm “Nematic Fermi fluids in condensed matter physics,” (Westview Press, 2000). Annual Reviews of Condensed Matter Physics 1, 153–178 (2010). [44] N. Goldenfeld, Lectures on Phase Transitions and Renor- [65] Vadim Oganesyan, Steven A. Kivelson, and Eduardo malization Group, 1st ed., The Advanced Book Program Fradkin, “Quantum theory of a nematic Fermi fluid,” (Perseus Books, Reading, Massachusetts, 1992). Phys. Rev. B 64, 195109 (2001). [45] M. Suzuki, “Phase transition and fractals,” Prog. Theor. [66] H. Watanabe and A. Vishwanath, “Criterion Phys. 69, 65–76 (1983). for stability of Goldstone modes and Fermi liq- [46] H. Kr¨oger, “Fractal geometry in quantum mechanics, uid behavior in a metal with broken symmetry,” field theory and spin systems,” Phys. Rep. 323, 81–181 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 16314–16318 (2014). (2000). [67] Michael J. Lawler, Daniel G. Barci, Victoria Fern´andez, [47] P. W. Anderson, “Absence of diffusion in certain random Eduardo Fradkin, and Luis Oxman, “Nonperturbative lattices,” Phys. Rev. 109, 1492–1505 (1958). behavior of the quantum phase transition to a nematic [48] Ad. Lagendijk, B. van Tiggelen, and D. S. Wiersma, Fermi fluid,” Phys. Rev. B 73, 085101 (2006). “Fifty years of Anderson localization,” Physics Today 62, [68] Manfred Sigrist and Kazuo Ueda, “Phenomenolog- 24–29 (2009). ical theory of unconventional superconductivity,” [49] E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 239–311 (1991). and T. V. Ramakrishnan, “Scaling theory of localiza- [69] P. W. Anderson, “Random-phase approxi- tion: Absence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions,” mation in the theory of superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673–676 (1979). Phys. Rev. 112, 1900–1916 (1958). [50] N. Mott, “The mobility edge since 1967,” J. Phys. C: [70] P. B. Littlewood and C. M. Varma, “Gauge- 17
invariant theory of the dynamical interaction ter Physics, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cam- of charge density waves and superconductivity,” bridge, England, 1995). Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 811–814 (1981). [80] Philip W. Anderson and Philip A. Casey, “Transport [71] P. B. Littlewood and C. M. Varma, “Amplitude collective anomalies of the strange metal: Resolution by hidden modes in superconductors and their coupling to charge- Fermi liquid theory,” Phys. Rev. B 80, 094508 (2009). density waves,” Phys. Rev. B 26, 4883–4893 (1982). [81] J. K. Jain and P. W. Anderson, “Beyond the [72] Martin C. Gutzwiller, “Effect of correlation Fermi liquid paradigm: Hidden Fermi liquids,” on the ferromagnetism of transition metals,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 9131–9134 (2009). Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 159–162 (1963). [82] Piers Coleman, Introduction to Many Body Physics, [73] P. W. Anderson, “The resonating valence bond state Chapter 16 and 17, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, in La2CuO4 and superconductivity,” Science 235, 1196– Cambridge, UK, 2015). 1198 (1987). [83] P. W. Anderson, “A poor man’s derivation of scaling laws [74] Dieter Vollhardt, “Normal 3He: an almost localized for the Kondo problem,” J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 3, Fermi liquid,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 99–120 (1984). 2436–2441 (1970). [75] B. Edegger, V. N. Nuthukumar, and C. Gros, [84] Qimiao Si, Silvio Rabello, Kevin Ingersent, and “Gutzwiller-RVB theory of high-temperature super- J. Lleweilun Smith, “Local fluctuations in quantum crit- conductivity: Results from renormalized mean-field ical metals,” Phys. Rev. B 68, 115103 (2003). theory and variational Monte Carlo calculations,” [85] P Nozi`eres, “A “Fermi-liquid” description of the Kondo Advances in Physics 56, 927–1033 (2007). problem at low temperatures,” J. Low Temp. Phys. 17, [76] H. Y. Yang, F. Yang, Y. J. Jiang, and T. Li, 31–42 (1974). “On the origin of the tunnelling asymmetry in the [86] Yi-feng Yang and David Pines, “Emer- cuprate superconductors: A variational perspective,” gent states in heavy-electron materials,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 016217 (2007). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, E3060–E3066 (2012). [77] Seiji Yunoki, “Single-particle anomalous excita- [87] Yi-feng Yang and David Pines, “Quantum crit- tions of Gutzwiller-projected BCS superconduc- ical behavior in heavy electron materials,” tors and Bogoliubov quasiparticle characteristics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 8398–8403 (2014). Phys. Rev. B 74, 180504 (2006). [88] Hilbert v. L¨ohneysen, Achim Rosch, Matthias [78] S. Lederer, Y. Schattner, E. Berg, and S. A. Vojta, and Peter W¨olfle, “Fermi-liquid insta- Kivelson, “Enhancement of superconductiv- bilities at magnetic quantum phase transitions,” ity near a nematic quantum critical point,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1015–1075 (2007). Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 097001 (2015). [79] A. M. Tsvelik, Quantum Field Theory in Condensed Mat-