Athelington, Horham & Redlingfield News Autumn 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mid Suffolk District Council
APPENDIX D MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSULTATION LIST FOR LICENSING ACT 2003 & GAMBLING ACT 2005 POLICY REVISIONS 1. All existing premises/club licence holders 2. Debenham Library 3. Elmswell Library 4. Eye Library 5. Needham Market Library 6. Stowmarket Library 7. Stradbroke Library 8. Thurston Library 9. Akenham Parish Meeting 10. Ashbocking Parish Council 11. Ashfield Cum Thorpe Parish Council 12. Bacton Parish Council 13. Badley Parish Meeting 14. Badwell Ash Parish Council 15. Barham Parish Council 16. Barking Parish Council 17. Battisford Parish Council 18. Baylham Parish Meeting 19. Bedfield Parish Council 20. Bedingfield Parish Council 21. Beyton Parish Council 22. Botesdale Parish Council 23. Braiseworth Parish Meeting 24. Bramford Parish Council 25. Brome and Oakley Parish Council 26. Brundish Parish Council 27. Buxhall Parish Council 28. Claydon and Whitton Parish Council 29. Coddenham Parish Council 30. Combs Parish Council 31. Cotton Parish Council 32. Creeting St Mary Parish Council 33. Creeting St Peter Parish Council 34. Crowfield Parish Council 35. Darmsden Parish Meeting 36. Debenham Parish Council 37. Denham Parish Council 38. Drinkstone Parish Council 39. Earl Stonham Parish Council 40. Elmswell Parish Council 41. Eye Town Council 42. Felsham Parish Council 43. Finningham Parish Council 44. Flowton Parish Meeting 45. Framsden Parish Council 46. Fressingfield Parish Council 47. Gedding Parish Meeting 48. Gislingham Parish Council 49. Gosbeck Parish Council 50. Great Ashfield Parish Council 51. Great Blakenham Parish Council 52. Great Bricett Parish Council 53. Great Finborough Parish Council 54. Harleston Parish Meeting 55. Haughley Parish Council 56. Helmingham Parish Council 57. Hemingstone Parish Council 58. Henley Parish Council 59. -
The Eye Directory 2018 - 2019 ©
The Eye Directory 2018 - 2019 © for residents of Eye and surrounding Suffolk villages The Eye Directory is compiled by Eye-to-Eye, 12, Orchard Close, Eye, Suffolk, UK v.2.5 updated 24th January 2019 The Eye Directory 2018 - 2019 © CONTENTS About this edition Acknowledgements How to contact an organisation listed Navigating your way through this online edition Organisations listed in this Directory A History of Eye Details of individual organisations – 1 Eye Business Directory 2 Voluntary organisations based in or serving Eye 3 Other organisations and services based in Eye 4 Voluntary organisations in villages surrounding Eye 5 Regional charities & community interest companies 6 National Charities serving our region 7 Other organisations, Services, and Facilities 8 Religious organisations – in or nearest to Eye Premises available for Hire in Eye Defibrillators within our communities Index The Eye Directory 2018 - 2019 © Acknowledgements The online version of The Eye Directory is based on the printed edition that was released in February 2018, and distributed to over 3,000 households in Eye and surrounding areas within Suffolk. Eye-to-Eye thanks Andrew Evitt for contributing a history of Eye, Mary Woodin (www.marywoodin.com) who, on behalf of The Eye Business Forum, designed the map that accompanies The Business Directory in section 1, and Tony Callender who has uploaded this edition on to the Eye Town Website. Making Contact with Organisations Contact details will normally be apparent from an organisation’s website if one is listed within these pages. If contact details are not available via a website, you may send an email to [email protected], and your email will then be forwarded to the organisation you specify. -
History of Southold, L.I. : Its First Century
SOUTHOLD. 1 640- 1 740. B^^B HISTORY OF SOUTHOLD, L. I. ITS FIRST CENTURY. BY THE REV. EPHER WHITAKER, D. D., Pastor of the First Church of Southold, Councilor of the Long Island Historical Society, Corresponding Member of the New York Genealogical and Biographical Society, etc, SOUTHOLD: Printed for the Author. 1881. ^ t^^" COPYRIGHT BY EPHER WHITAKER. 1881, PRESS OF THE ORANGE CHRONICLE,, ORANGE, N. J, O 30 TO MR. THOMAS R. TROWBRIDGE AND MR. WILLIAM H. H. MOORE, WHO MAY SEVERALLY REPRESENT THE PLACES OF THEIR BIRTH, THE CENTRAL CITY AND THE REMOTEST TOWN OF ^ THE NEW HAVEN COLONY, AND WHOSE APPRECIATION AND GENEROSITY HAVE CHEERED THE PREPARATION OF THIS VOLUME, IT IS MOST • RESPECTFULLY AND GRATEFULLY DEDICATED BY THE AUTHOR. PREFACE. The acquisition of the greater part of the knowledge contained in this vohime has re- sulted Trom the duties and necessities of the Christian ministry in the pastoral care of the First' Church of Southold for the last thirty years. The preparation of the book for the press has been the rest and recreation of many a weary hour during most of this ministry. Various hindrances have resisted the accom- plishment of the undertaking, and caused a less orderly arrangement of the materials of the work, as well as a less vigorous and at- tra6tive style, than could be desired; but the belief is cherished, that the imperfections of the book, however clearly seen by the reader, and deeply felt by the writer, should not for- bid its publication. For it is highly desirable, that the early life and worth—the purpose. -
ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILE 2017 This Division Comprises Eye, Fressingfield, Hoxne, Stradbroke and Laxfield Wards
HOXNE & EYE ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILE 2017 This Division comprises Eye, Fressingfield, Hoxne, Stradbroke and Laxfield wards www.suffolkobservatory.info © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100023395 2 CONTENTS . Demographic Profile: Age & Ethnicity . Economy and Labour Market . Schools & NEET . Index of Multiple Deprivation . Health . Crime & Community Safety . Additional Information . Data Sources 3 ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILES: AN INTRODUCTION These profiles have been produced to support elected members, constituents and other interested parties in understanding the demographic, economic, social and educational profile of their neighbourhoods. We have used the latest data available at the time of publication. Much more data is available from national and local sources than is captured here, but it is hoped that the profile will be a useful starting point for discussion, where local knowledge and experience can be used to flesh out and illuminate the information presented here. The profile can be used to help look at some fundamental questions e.g. Does the age profile of the population match or differ from the national profile? . Is there evidence of the ageing profile of the county in all the wards in the Division or just some? . How diverse is the community in terms of ethnicity? . What is the impact of deprivation on families and residents? . Does there seem to be a link between deprivation and school performance? . What is the breakdown of employment sectors in the area? . Is it a relatively healthy area compared to the rest of the district or county? . What sort of crime is prevalent in the community? A vast amount of additional data is available on the Suffolk Observatory www.suffolkobservatory.info The Suffolk Observatory is a free online resource that contains all Suffolk’s vital statistics; it is the one‐stop‐shop for information and intelligence about Suffolk. -
English Hundred-Names
l LUNDS UNIVERSITETS ARSSKRIFT. N. F. Avd. 1. Bd 30. Nr 1. ,~ ,j .11 . i ~ .l i THE jl; ENGLISH HUNDRED-NAMES BY oL 0 f S. AND ER SON , LUND PHINTED BY HAKAN DHLSSON I 934 The English Hundred-Names xvn It does not fall within the scope of the present study to enter on the details of the theories advanced; there are points that are still controversial, and some aspects of the question may repay further study. It is hoped that the etymological investigation of the hundred-names undertaken in the following pages will, Introduction. when completed, furnish a starting-point for the discussion of some of the problems connected with the origin of the hundred. 1. Scope and Aim. Terminology Discussed. The following chapters will be devoted to the discussion of some The local divisions known as hundreds though now practi aspects of the system as actually in existence, which have some cally obsolete played an important part in judicial administration bearing on the questions discussed in the etymological part, and in the Middle Ages. The hundredal system as a wbole is first to some general remarks on hundred-names and the like as shown in detail in Domesday - with the exception of some embodied in the material now collected. counties and smaller areas -- but is known to have existed about THE HUNDRED. a hundred and fifty years earlier. The hundred is mentioned in the laws of Edmund (940-6),' but no earlier evidence for its The hundred, it is generally admitted, is in theory at least a existence has been found. -
The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Electoral Review of Mid Suffolk
SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF MID SUFFOLK Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of Mid Suffolk August 2018 MENDHAM Sheet 1 of 1 CP Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background WEYBREAD may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information CP applied as part of this review. METFIELD CP This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2018. FRESSINGFIELD PALGRAVE WORTHAM SYLEHAM CP CP REDGRAVE CP STUSTON CP CP BROME AND FRESSINGFIELD HINDERCLAY WINGFIELD OAKLEY CP CP KEY TO PARISH WARDS CP CP THRANDESTON STOWMARKET CP CP A CHILTON NORTH RICKINGHALL HOXNE B CHILTON SOUTH CP C COMBS FORD BOTESDALE D ST PETER'S NORTH CP BURGATE RICKINGHALL E ST PETER'S SOUTH CP INFERIOR CP F STOW THORNEY MELLIS CP STRADBROKE YAXLEY CP CP WATTISFIELD RICKINGHALL CP SUPERIOR CP PALGRAVE EYE DENHAM CP GISLINGHAM CP THORNHAM PARVA CP EYE STRADBROKE & LAXFIELD HORHAM CP LAXFIELD CP GISLINGHAM BRAISEWORTH WILBY CP CP CP THORNHAM WALSHAM-LE-WILLOWS MAGNA CP CP OCCOLD CP REDLINGFIELD CP ATHELINGTON WALSHAM-LE-WILLOWS CP STOKE ASH CP HOXNE & FINNINGHAM WORLINGWORTH BRUNDISH LANGHAM CP CP CP WESTHORPE CP SOUTHOLT BADWELL CP WORLINGWORTH ASH CP CP STOWLANGTOFT WICKHAM CP SKEITH CP RISHANGLES THORNDON CP -
Athelington (Otherwise Allington)
1. Parish: Athelington (otherwise Allington) Meaning: a. The homestead/village of the aethelings or princes b. The homestead/village of Aepelheah’s people 2. Hundred: Hoxne Deanery: Hoxne Union: Hoxne (1835–1907), Hartismere RD (1934–1974), Mid Suffolk DC (1974–) RDC/UDC: (E. Suffolk) Hoxne RD (1894–1934), Hartismere RD (1934–1974), Mid Suffolk DC (1974–) Other administrative details: Hoxne Petty Sessional Division Framlingham and Saxmundham County Court District 3. Area: 494 acres (1912) 4. Soils: slowly permeable seasonally waterlogged fine loam over clay 5. Types of farming: 1500–1640 Thirsk: Wood-pasture region, mainly pasture, meadow, engaged in rearing and dairying with some pig keeping, horse breeding and poultry 1818 Marshall: Course of crops varies usually including summer fallow as preparation for corn products 1937 Main crops: Wheat, barley, peas and beans 1969 Trist: More intensive cereal growing and sugar beet 6. Enclosure: 7. Settlement: 1958 Railway crossed parish from N–S Extremely small development around the church. Settlement positioned close to northern boundary Few scattered farms Inhabited houses: 1674 – 7, 1801 – 11, 1851 – 25, 1871 – 26, 1901 – 19, 1951 – 12, 1981 – 14 1 8. Communications: Road: To Bedingfield, Horham, Wilby and Worlingworth 1891 Carrier to Ipswich on Thursday Rail: 1891 4½ miles Eye Station: Mellis–Eye line opened 1865, closed for passengers 1931, closed for goods 1964 9. Population: 1086 – Not recorded 1327 – 32 taxpayers paid £3 11s. (includes Horham) 1524 – 8 taxpayers paid 19s. 2d. 1603 – 35 adults 1674 – 7 households 1676 – Not recorded 1801 – 70 inhabitants 1831 – 129 inhabitants 1851 – 117 inhabitants 1871 – 129 inhabitants 1901 – 87 inhabitants 1931 – 71 inhabitants 1951 – 38 inhabitants 1971 – 51 inhabitants 1981 – 35 inhabitants 10. -
Statement of Persons Nominated
STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED Suffolk County Council Election of a County Councillor The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a County Councillor for Bosmere Division Reason Name of Description Name of Proposer (*), Seconder (**) why no Home Address Candidate (if any) and Assentors longer nominated CARTER Danescroft, The Green Party Coomber Granville Dorothy B Terence S Ipswich Road, Thomas W F * Turner Judith C Needham Coomber Amy J L ** Turner Geoffrey M Market, Ipswich, Coomber Gouldsmith Nicola B Suffolk, IP6 8EG Gregory D E Matthissen John E Coomber Ruth Carter Bistra C ELLIOTT 3 Old Rectory Labour Party Marsburg William J * Hiskey Clive I Tony Close, Barham, Marsburg Hayley J ** Brace Frances J IP6 0PY Smith Brenda Hawkins Kester T Smith William E Evans Emma L Hiskey Gladys M Marsburg Paul J PHILLIPS 46 Crowley Liberal Marchant Wendy * Gayle Lynn Steve Road, Needham Democrat Norris Michael G ** Salisbury Anna L Market, IP6 8BJ Poulson David J Luff Robert A Berry Graham T Mayhew Peggy E Phillips Margaret A Thorpe Peter WHYBROW The Old Rectory, The Welham Claire E * Walker Claire V Anne Elizabeth Stowmarket Conservative Walker Roger E ** Stephens-Row Jane Road, Ringshall, Party Candidate Stratton John M Julia B Stowmarket, Stratton Carole J Stephens-Row Suffolk, IP14 2HZ Brega Michael J David E Groves Stuart J Whybrow David S The persons above, where no entry is made in the last column, have been and stand validly nominated. Dated Wednesday 5 April 2017 Arthur Charvonia Deputy Returning Officer Printed -
Topic Paper – Settlement Hierarchy Review
Working Together Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation Topic Paper – Settlement Hierarchy Review July 2019 1. Introduction 1.1 This Topic Paper accompanies the Settlement Hierarchy section of the Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Draft Local Plan (July 2019). 1.2 The purpose of this Topic Paper is to present additional detail and context behind the new Settlement Hierarchy as proposed by the Joint Local Plan. 1.3 As part of the preparation of the new Joint Local Plan for Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils, a review of the settlement hierarchy was carried out to reflect changes that have occurred over recent years and to ensure that the settlements are appropriately categorised in relation to the services and facilities they provide. 1.4 This study collates information on the services and facilities availability of villages in both districts. Comments received during the Joint Local Plan consultation (August – November 2017) have been considered in the production of this Topic Paper and the resulting Settlement Hierarchy in the Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan. 1.5 Babergh and Mid Suffolk currently have different settlement hierarchies as set out in the Babergh Core Strategy (2014) and Mid Suffolk Core Strategy (2008). The Joint Local Plan seeks to provide a single hierarchy across both Districts, and this Topic Paper classifies ‘Core Villages’, ‘Hinterland Villages’ and ‘Hamlets’. The classification is based on the availability of, or access to, facilities and services, to indicate their relative sustainability as locations for development. Settlements that do not have ten or more well related dwellings have not been identified in the settlement hierarchy. -
Athelington Horham & Redlingfield News Spring 2020 No 49
Athelington, Horham & Redlingfield NEWS SPRING 2020 ISSUE NO. 49 SPURLING & REMBLANCE MOTOR ENGINEERS MOT TEST CENTRE Service and repairs to all cars, light commercial and 4x4s Specialists in vehicle diagnostics Free local collection and delivery Courtesy car available Prompt attention assured Competitive rates (01379) 384689 Open 8.00am-5.30pm Mon-Fri, 8am-noon Saturdays Barley Hall, Laxfield Road, Stradbroke, IP21 5NQ on the B1117 - 1¾ mile outside Stradbroke, towards Laxfield EDITORIAL E’VE HAD SOME VERY BLUSTERY AND SOGGY WEATHER Wrecently with two stormy weekend’s running. Below is a picture of damage caused by the first storm, Ciara. The tree on Mill Road, Redlingfield, took out fibreoptic cables and along with a fault in Occold this meant the village went back to the pre-fast broadband days for a week. I would like to thank UK Power Networks who quickly came out to inspect and and assure us it was safe and the locals who then got chainsawing and cleared the road double quick. I would also like to thank the Openreach engineers who braved the following weekends’ storm Dennis going up in a cherry-picker in high winds to get Redlingfield back online. Mike Ager Damage caused by storm Ciara. REMEMBER TO PUT YOUR CLOCKS FORWARD AT THE END OF MARCH. ■ PLANNING: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REQUIRED: for plan for 7 poultry sheds on land to the south of B1117 Horham & 12 proposed poultry sheds on land to the east of Woodlane Road, Southolt. GRANTED: application to erect four poultry houses, store & offices (following demolition of six existing poultry houses), Homefield Farm, Southolt Road, Athelington. -
NOTICE of POLL Election of Town Councillors
NOTICE OF POLL Mid Suffolk Election of Town Councillors for (Stowmarket) Chilton South Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of Town Councillors for (Stowmarket) Chilton South will be held on Thursday 2 May 2019, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of Town Councillors to be elected is two. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Assentors AMOROWSON 5 Wordsworth Road, Green Party David Whitehead (+) Joe Farrington (++) Oliver Antonio Stowmarket, Suffolk, IP14 1TT CHILD 11 The Becketts, Liberal Democrat Frank Cracknell (+) Sally Cracknell (++) David Robert Stowmarket, Suffolk, IP14 1TZ SALMON 27 Windermere Road, Labour Party Christine Gillingham (+) John Gillingham (++) Heather Stowmarket, IP14 1LD 4. The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: Station Ranges of electoral register numbers of Situation of Polling Station Number persons entitled to vote thereat Stowmarket (SCH1) - Bowls Committee Room, Mid Suffolk M15 MSCHS-1 to MSCHS-1810 Leisure Centre, Gainsborough Road, Stowmarket 5. Where contested this poll is taken together with the election of District Councillors. Dated Thursday 4th April 2019 Arthur Charvonia Returning Officer Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Endeavour House, 8 Russell Road, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP1 2BX NOTICE OF POLL Mid Suffolk Election of Town Councillors for (Stowmarket) Stow Thorney Notice is hereby given that: 1. -
The Reduced Population and Wealth of Early Fifteenth
THE REDUCED POPULATION AND WEALTH OF EARLY FIFTEENTH-CENTURY SUFFOLK by DAVID DYMOND, M.A., F.S.A. and ROGER VIRGOE, PH.D., F.R.HIST.S. IN THE SESSION of Parliament which met between 27 January and 25 March 1428, the Council governing England during Henry VI's minority asked for subsidies to pay for the continuing war in France and for the safe-keeping of the sea. In response the Commons made three grants.' The first was of tunnage and poundage for a year; the second a grant of 6s. 8d. per knight' s fee, a traditional and by now obsolescent feudal aid; the third was a novel, if not quite unprecedented, tax levied on parishes and not, like the normal fifteenth and tenth, on townships.' The last of these grants is the most interesting. Payment had to be made by each rural parish which had ten households or more. If the living of the church was assessed for clerical taxes at less than ten marks, householders were to pay half a mark (6s. 8d.); if it was assessed at ten marks or more, they were to pay at the rate of one mark (13s. 4d.) for each ten marks' valuation. In boroughs the householders of each parish were to pay at the rate of 2s. for every £1 in the valuation of the living. Those parishes which contained fewer than ten households were exempt from payment. It is not the purpose of this paper to examine the reasons for this peculiar hybrid tax, which was not repeated.' For the local historian the most interesting information in the returns is the listing of exempt parishes with small populations.