Accurate Absolute Magnitudes for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Accurate Absolute Magnitudes for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs Icarus 179 (2005) 523–526 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Accurate absolute magnitudes for Kuiper belt objects and Centaurs W. Romanishin a,∗,1, S.C. Tegler b,1 a Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA b Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA Received 31 March 2005; revised 18 June 2005 Available online 15 August 2005 Abstract Accurate absolute optical magnitude values (HV and HR) for Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) and Centaurs are becoming increasingly impor- tant as observations in other wavelengths, particularly SIRTF thermal infrared measurements, become available for large samples of objects. We present accurate HV and HR values for 90 KBOs and Centaurs, based on our published optical photometry. We find that our HV values are in good agreement with those available from the European photometric survey of minor bodies in the outer Solar System. Comparison with HV values from the JPL Horizons database and the Minor Planet Center database shows that these sources are systematically brighter than ours by about 0.3 mag. 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Centaurs; Kuiper belt objects; Trans-neptunian objects 1. Introduction magnitude is one of the most basic observable quantities of a minor Solar System body. There are now about 1000 cataloged minor outer So- Several groups are using infrared measurements of KBOs lar System bodies, with about 500 having been observed at and Centaurs, these being obtained with SIRTF, to measure more than one opposition. For the vast majority, nothing is the thermal emission properties of a subset of the population. known of their intrinsic physical properties. In 1995, we be- These observations should yield important new information gan a large and systematic program to obtain optical (BVR) on the sizes of these objects. Comparison of the infrared and colors and magnitudes for a sample of these objects. Our optical fluxes can yield the optical albedo. program has been aimed at obtaining accurate optical colors To obtain an accurate optical albedo from comparison and searching for correlations of color with various orbital of optical and infrared observations, an accurate optical ab- parameters (see, e.g., Tegler et al., 2003). In addition to opti- solute magnitude or flux value is required. Because of the cal colors, we have also obtained some information on light increasing importance of accurate values of optical parame- curves of individual objects (Romanishin and Tegler, 1999; ters, we present here such information for the objects for Romanishin et al., 2001). which we have published optical photometry. We also com- For all objects in our sample, we have measured accurate pare our derived HV values with those available from several V band magnitudes and V–R colors from at least one epoch. large databases of properties of minor Solar System bodies. These data can, of course, be used to derive an estimate of the absolute visual magnitudes (HV) of the objects. The HV 2. Absolute magnitudes * Corresponding author. Fax: +1 405 325 7557. E-mail address: [email protected] (W. Romanishin). We use the H , G formalism (Bowell et al., 1989) to derive 1 Observers at the Keck I, Bok, and Vatican Advanced Technology tele- the absolute visual magnitude (HV), which is the magnitude scopes. that would be observed in the V passband by an observer at 0019-1035/$ – see front matter 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.06.016 524 W. Romanishin, S.C. Tegler / Icarus 179 (2005) 523–526 a distance of 1 AU from an object that is 1 AU from the Sun, Table 1 at a phase angle of 0◦. HV and HR magnitudes We derive HV from the observed V magnitude, distances, Number Name Prov. Des. H H and phase angle: V R 2003 CO1 9.29 8.80 HV = V − 5log(r) 2001 XZ255 11.24 10.49 + 2.5log (1 − G)Φ1(α) + GΦ2(α) , (1) 2001 SQ73 9.24 8.78 2001 QX322 6.70 6.10 where V is the measured magnitude of the object in V band, 2001 KG77 8.62 8.18 r is the heliocentric distance (in AU) at the time of obser- 2001 KC77 7.23 6.67 vation, is the geocentric distance (in AU) at the time of 2001 FM194 7.91 7.47 observation, α is the phase angle (Sun–target–observer an- 2000 KK4 6.46 5.82 gle) at time of observation and 2000 FZ53 11.72 11.16 2000 FS53 7.88 7.17 1 Bi 2000 CR105 6.60 6.08 Φi(α) = exp −Ai tan α , (2) 2000 CQ105 6.29 5.85 2 2000 CF105 7.59 6.89 1999 TR11 8.63 7.88 where i = 1, 2, A1 = 3.33, B1 = 0.63, A2 = 1.87, B2 = 1999 HV11 7.47 6.88 1.22. 1999 HS11 6.88 6.16 We assume a G value of 0.15, which is the value most 1999 CF119 7.42 6.81 often adopted for this class of objects. Using observations 1998 WX24 6.79 6.09 = 1998 WV24 7.43 6.93 over a range of α, Buie and Bus (1992) derive G 0.16 for 1998 KS65 7.63 6.99 (5145) Pholus. Unfortunately, almost all of our observations 1998 FS144 7.17 6.60 of individual objects are made at a single epoch, so we can- 1997 SZ10 8.75 8.10 not constrain G values. 1997 QH4 7.44 6.77 Observed V magnitudes and observation dates were 1997 CV29 7.71 7.06 1997 CT29 7.19 6.44 taken from our published papers (Tegler and Romanishin, 1996 TS66 6.50 5.74 1998, 2000, 2003; Romanishin and Tegler, 1999; Tegler 1996 TQ66 7.69 6.99 et al., 2003). Distances (r and ) were derived from the 1996 TK66 6.75 6.12 JPL Horizons online database (Giorgini et al., 1996; http: 1996 RR20 7.20 6.49 //ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons_doc.html). For objects with H 1996 RQ20 7.00 6.56 V 1995 HM5 8.29 7.88 listed in Romanishin and Tegler (1999),newHV values were 1994 TA 12.05 11.37 derived for consistency and also to use distances from orbits 1993 RO 8.92 8.41 with any improvements made since that paper. The new HV 1993 FW 7.09 6.46 values for these objects agree to within 0.01 mag with our 95626 2002 GZ32 7.24 6.82 previously published values. 88269 2001 KF77 10.52 9.79 87269 2000 OO67 9.82 9.10 Our derived HV values are listed in Table 1.Forthe 86047 1999 OY3 6.46 6.09 majority of the objects, we have observations taken only 85633 1998 KR65 7.10 6.43 during one night, or perhaps a few nights during one ob- 83982 2002 GO9 9.17 8.41 serving run. The information in this table is available online 82158 2001 FP185 6.38 5.80 at http://observatory.ou.edu/kbos.html. Our color survey is 82155 2001 FZ173 6.23 5.68 82075 2000 YW134 4.74 4.19 continuing, and we will update the online information as we 79360 1997 CS29 5.52 4.91 derive final magnitudes and colors for newly observed ob- 73480 2002 PN34 8.66 8.14 jects. For convenience we also list HR values in Table 1, 65489 2003 FX128 6.60 6.04 63252 2001 BL41 11.46 10.95 derived from the HV values and published V–R colors. 60621 2000 FE8 6.83 6.35 60608 2000 EE173 8.49 8.00 60458 2000 CM114 7.36 6.86 3. Comparison with other sources 55636 2002 TX300 3.47 3.11 54598 Bienor 2000 QC243 7.69 7.19 Another large photometric survey of minor outer Solar 52975 Cyllarus 1998 TF35 8.99 8.24 System bodies is available from a collaboration of a number 52872 Okyrhoe 1998 SG35 11.23 10.75 52747 1998 HM151 8.02 7.40 of observers using European Southern Observatory (ESO) 50000 Quaoar 2002 LM60 2.74 2.10 telescopes. They present HV values (Doressoundiram et al., 49036 Pelion 1998 QM107 10.54 10.02 2002) or HR values (Peixinho et al., 2004), which we con- 47171 1999 TC36 5.33 4.64 44594 1999 OX3 7.85 7.16 verted to HV values by adding their V–R color for each ob- ject. Ignoring a few objects in these lists with large (greater 42355 2002 CR46 7.65 7.13 (continued on next page) than 0.1) errors in HV, we find 30 objects in common with Absolute magnitudes of KBOs 525 Table 1 (continued) differences between the HV values listed in Table 1 and Number Name Prov. Des. HV HR those obtained from the other databases. The distribution of 38628 Huya 2000 EB173 5.03 4.43 magnitude differences are shown in Fig. 1. The average dif- 38084 1999 HB12 7.04 6.47 ference between JPL and ours (HV (JPL) − HV (ours)) is 33001 1997 CU29 6.68 6.02 −0.34 (s = 0.33). The average difference between MPC and 32929 1995 QY9 8.06 7.59 ours (HV (MPC) − HV (ours)) is −0.29 (s = 0.34). Thus, 32532 Thereus 2001 PT13 9.32 8.85 these HV magnitudes are significantly brighter than ours. 31824 Elatus 1999 UG5 10.49 9.82 29981 1999 TD10 9.06 8.59 To find the origin of these systematic offsets in HV val- 26375 1999 DE9 5.20 4.62 ues, one would have to carefully review the input magni- 26308 1998 SM165 6.13 5.38 tudes into the databases for each object.
Recommended publications
  • Commission 27 of the Iau Information Bulletin
    COMMISSION 27 OF THE I.A.U. INFORMATION BULLETIN ON VARIABLE STARS Nos. 2401 - 2500 1983 September - 1984 March EDITORS: B. SZEIDL AND L. SZABADOS, KONKOLY OBSERVATORY 1525 BUDAPEST, Box 67, HUNGARY HU ISSN 0374-0676 CONTENTS 2401 A POSSIBLE CATACLYSMIC VARIABLE IN CANCER Masaaki Huruhata 20 September 1983 2402 A NEW RR-TYPE VARIABLE IN LEO Masaaki Huruhata 20 September 1983 2403 ON THE DELTA SCUTI STAR BD +43d1894 A. Yamasaki, A. Okazaki, M. Kitamura 23 September 1983 2404 IQ Vel: IMPROVED LIGHT-CURVE PARAMETERS L. Kohoutek 26 September 1983 2405 FLARE ACTIVITY OF EPSILON AURIGAE? I.-S. Nha, S.J. Lee 28 September 1983 2406 PHOTOELECTRIC OBSERVATIONS OF 20 CVn Y.W. Chun, Y.S. Lee, I.-S. Nha 30 September 1983 2407 MINIMUM TIMES OF THE ECLIPSING VARIABLES AH Cep AND IU Aur Pavel Mayer, J. Tremko 4 October 1983 2408 PHOTOELECTRIC OBSERVATIONS OF THE FLARE STAR EV Lac IN 1980 G. Asteriadis, S. Avgoloupis, L.N. Mavridis, P. Varvoglis 6 October 1983 2409 HD 37824: A NEW VARIABLE STAR Douglas S. Hall, G.W. Henry, H. Louth, T.R. Renner 10 October 1983 2410 ON THE PERIOD OF BW VULPECULAE E. Szuszkiewicz, S. Ratajczyk 12 October 1983 2411 THE UNIQUE DOUBLE-MODE CEPHEID CO Aur E. Antonello, L. Mantegazza 14 October 1983 2412 FLARE STARS IN TAURUS A.S. Hojaev 14 October 1983 2413 BVRI PHOTOMETRY OF THE ECLIPSING BINARY QX Cas Thomas J. Moffett, T.G. Barnes, III 17 October 1983 2414 THE ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDE OF AZ CANCRI William P. Bidelman, D. Hoffleit 17 October 1983 2415 NEW DATA ABOUT THE APSIDAL MOTION IN THE SYSTEM OF RU MONOCEROTIS D.Ya.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dunhuang Chinese Sky: a Comprehensive Study of the Oldest Known Star Atlas
    25/02/09JAHH/v4 1 THE DUNHUANG CHINESE SKY: A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE OLDEST KNOWN STAR ATLAS JEAN-MARC BONNET-BIDAUD Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique ,Centre de Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France E-mail: [email protected] FRANÇOISE PRADERIE Observatoire de Paris, 61 Avenue de l’Observatoire, F- 75014 Paris, France E-mail: [email protected] and SUSAN WHITFIELD The British Library, 96 Euston Road, London NW1 2DB, UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: This paper presents an analysis of the star atlas included in the medieval Chinese manuscript (Or.8210/S.3326), discovered in 1907 by the archaeologist Aurel Stein at the Silk Road town of Dunhuang and now held in the British Library. Although partially studied by a few Chinese scholars, it has never been fully displayed and discussed in the Western world. This set of sky maps (12 hour angle maps in quasi-cylindrical projection and a circumpolar map in azimuthal projection), displaying the full sky visible from the Northern hemisphere, is up to now the oldest complete preserved star atlas from any civilisation. It is also the first known pictorial representation of the quasi-totality of the Chinese constellations. This paper describes the history of the physical object – a roll of thin paper drawn with ink. We analyse the stellar content of each map (1339 stars, 257 asterisms) and the texts associated with the maps. We establish the precision with which the maps are drawn (1.5 to 4° for the brightest stars) and examine the type of projections used.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Characteristics of Transneptunian Objects and Centaurs from Photometry and Spectroscopy
    Barucci et al.: Surface Characteristics of TNOs and Centaurs 647 Surface Characteristics of Transneptunian Objects and Centaurs from Photometry and Spectroscopy M. A. Barucci and A. Doressoundiram Observatoire de Paris D. P. Cruikshank NASA Ames Research Center The external region of the solar system contains a vast population of small icy bodies, be- lieved to be remnants from the accretion of the planets. The transneptunian objects (TNOs) and Centaurs (located between Jupiter and Neptune) are probably made of the most primitive and thermally unprocessed materials of the known solar system. Although the study of these objects has rapidly evolved in the past few years, especially from dynamical and theoretical points of view, studies of the physical and chemical properties of the TNO population are still limited by the faintness of these objects. The basic properties of these objects, including infor- mation on their dimensions and rotation periods, are presented, with emphasis on their diver- sity and the possible characteristics of their surfaces. 1. INTRODUCTION cally with even the largest telescopes. The physical char- acteristics of Centaurs and TNOs are still in a rather early Transneptunian objects (TNOs), also known as Kuiper stage of investigation. Advances in instrumentation on tele- belt objects (KBOs) and Edgeworth-Kuiper belt objects scopes of 6- to 10-m aperture have enabled spectroscopic (EKBOs), are presumed to be remnants of the solar nebula studies of an increasing number of these objects, and signifi- that have survived over the age of the solar system. The cant progress is slowly being made. connection of the short-period comets (P < 200 yr) of low We describe here photometric and spectroscopic studies orbital inclination and the transneptunian population of pri- of TNOs and the emerging results.
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Positions: 1 Planet Positions
    Planet Positions: 1 Planet Positions As the planets orbit the Sun, they move around the celestial sphere, staying close to the plane of the ecliptic. As seen from the Earth, the angle between the Sun and a planet -- called the elongation -- constantly changes. We can identify a few special configurations of the planets -- those positions where the elongation is particularly noteworthy. The inferior planets -- those which orbit closer INFERIOR PLANETS to the Sun than Earth does -- have configurations as shown: SC At both superior conjunction (SC) and inferior conjunction (IC), the planet is in line with the Earth and Sun and has an elongation of 0°. At greatest elongation, the planet reaches its IC maximum separation from the Sun, a value GEE GWE dependent on the size of the planet's orbit. At greatest eastern elongation (GEE), the planet lies east of the Sun and trails it across the sky, while at greatest western elongation (GWE), the planet lies west of the Sun, leading it across the sky. Best viewing for inferior planets is generally at greatest elongation, when the planet is as far from SUPERIOR PLANETS the Sun as it can get and thus in the darkest sky possible. C The superior planets -- those orbiting outside of Earth's orbit -- have configurations as shown: A planet at conjunction (C) is lined up with the Sun and has an elongation of 0°, while a planet at opposition (O) lies in the opposite direction from the Sun, at an elongation of 180°. EQ WQ Planets at quadrature have elongations of 90°.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans-Neptunian Objects a Brief History, Dynamical Structure, and Characteristics of Its Inhabitants
    Trans-Neptunian Objects A Brief history, Dynamical Structure, and Characteristics of its Inhabitants John Stansberry Space Telescope Science Institute IAC Winter School 2016 IAC Winter School 2016 -- Kuiper Belt Overview -- J. Stansberry 1 The Solar System beyond Neptune: History • 1930: Pluto discovered – Photographic survey for Planet X • Directed by Percival Lowell (Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, Arizona) • Efforts from 1905 – 1929 were fruitless • discovered by Clyde Tombaugh, Feb. 1930 (33 cm refractor) – Survey continued into 1943 • Kuiper, or Edgeworth-Kuiper, Belt? – 1950’s: Pluto represented (K.E.), or had scattered (G.K.) a primordial, population of small bodies – thus KBOs or EKBOs – J. Fernandez (1980, MNRAS 192) did pretty clearly predict something similar to the trans-Neptunian belt of objects – Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), trans-Neptunian region best? – See http://www2.ess.ucla.edu/~jewitt/kb/gerard.html IAC Winter School 2016 -- Kuiper Belt Overview -- J. Stansberry 2 The Solar System beyond Neptune: History • 1978: Pluto’s moon, Charon, discovered – Photographic astrometry survey • 61” (155 cm) reflector • James Christy (Naval Observatory, Flagstaff) – Technologically, discovery was possible decades earlier • Saturation of Pluto images masked the presence of Charon • 1988: Discovery of Pluto’s atmosphere – Stellar occultation • Kuiper airborne observatory (KAO: 90 cm) + 7 sites • Measured atmospheric refractivity vs. height • Spectroscopy suggested N2 would dominate P(z), T(z) • 1992: Pluto’s orbit explained • Outward migration by Neptune results in capture into 3:2 resonance • Pluto’s inclination implies Neptune migrated outward ~5 AU IAC Winter School 2016 -- Kuiper Belt Overview -- J. Stansberry 3 The Solar System beyond Neptune: History • 1992: Discovery of 2nd TNO • 1976 – 92: Multiple dedicated surveys for small (mV > 20) TNOs • Fall 1992: Jewitt and Luu discover 1992 QB1 – Orbit confirmed as ~circular, trans-Neptunian in 1993 • 1993 – 4: 5 more TNOs discovered • c.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kuiper Belt Luminosity Function from Mr = 22 to 25 Jean-Marc Petit, M
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archive Ouverte en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication The Kuiper Belt luminosity function from mR = 22 to 25 Jean-Marc Petit, M. Holman, B. Gladman, J. Kavelaars, H. Scholl, T. Loredo To cite this version: Jean-Marc Petit, M. Holman, B. Gladman, J. Kavelaars, H. Scholl, et al.. The Kuiper Belt lu- minosity function from mR = 22 to 25. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy P - Oxford Open Option A, 2006, 365 (2), pp.429-438. 10.1111/j.1365- 2966.2005.09661.x. hal-02374819 HAL Id: hal-02374819 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02374819 Submitted on 21 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1{11 (2005) Printed 7 September 2005 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) The Kuiper Belt's luminosity function from mR=22{25. J-M. Petit1;7?, M.J. Holman2;7, B.J. Gladman3;5;7, J.J. Kavelaars4;7 H. Scholl3 and T.J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opposition and Tilt Effects of Saturn's Rings from HST Observations
    The opposition and tilt effects of Saturn’s rings from HST observations Heikki Salo, Richard G. French To cite this version: Heikki Salo, Richard G. French. The opposition and tilt effects of Saturn’s rings from HST observa- tions. Icarus, Elsevier, 2010, 210 (2), pp.785. 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.002. hal-00693815 HAL Id: hal-00693815 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00693815 Submitted on 3 May 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accepted Manuscript The opposition and tilt effects of Saturn’s rings from HST observations Heikki Salo, Richard G. French PII: S0019-1035(10)00274-5 DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.002 Reference: YICAR 9498 To appear in: Icarus Received Date: 30 March 2009 Revised Date: 2 July 2010 Accepted Date: 2 July 2010 Please cite this article as: Salo, H., French, R.G., The opposition and tilt effects of Saturn’s rings from HST observations, Icarus (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.002 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Galaxies – AS 3011
    Galaxies – AS 3011 Simon Driver [email protected] ... room 308 This is a Junior Honours 18-lecture course Lectures 11am Wednesday & Friday Recommended book: The Structure and Evolution of Galaxies by Steven Phillipps Galaxies – AS 3011 1 Aims • To understand: – What is a galaxy – The different kinds of galaxy – The optical properties of galaxies – The hidden properties of galaxies such as dark matter, presence of black holes, etc. – Galaxy formation concepts and large scale structure • Appreciate: – Why galaxies are interesting, as building blocks of the Universe… and how simple calculations can be used to better understand these systems. Galaxies – AS 3011 2 1 from 1st year course: • AS 1001 covered the basics of : – distances, masses, types etc. of galaxies – spectra and hence dynamics – exotic things in galaxies: dark matter and black holes – galaxies on a cosmological scale – the Big Bang • in AS 3011 we will study dynamics in more depth, look at other non-stellar components of galaxies, and introduce high-redshift galaxies and the large-scale structure of the Universe Galaxies – AS 3011 3 Outline of lectures 1) galaxies as external objects 13) large-scale structure 2) types of galaxy 14) luminosity of the Universe 3) our Galaxy (components) 15) primordial galaxies 4) stellar populations 16) active galaxies 5) orbits of stars 17) anomalies & enigmas 6) stellar distribution – ellipticals 18) revision & exam advice 7) stellar distribution – spirals 8) dynamics of ellipticals plus 3-4 tutorials 9) dynamics of spirals (questions set after
    [Show full text]
  • Mass of the Kuiper Belt · 9Th Planet PACS 95.10.Ce · 96.12.De · 96.12.Fe · 96.20.-N · 96.30.-T
    Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Mass of the Kuiper Belt E. V. Pitjeva · N. P. Pitjev Received: 13 December 2017 / Accepted: 24 August 2018 The final publication ia available at Springer via http://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-018-9853-5 Abstract The Kuiper belt includes tens of thousands of large bodies and millions of smaller objects. The main part of the belt objects is located in the annular zone between 39.4 au and 47.8 au from the Sun, the boundaries correspond to the average distances for orbital resonances 3:2 and 2:1 with the motion of Neptune. One-dimensional, two-dimensional, and discrete rings to model the total gravitational attraction of numerous belt objects are consid- ered. The discrete rotating model most correctly reflects the real interaction of bodies in the Solar system. The masses of the model rings were determined within EPM2017—the new version of ephemerides of planets and the Moon at IAA RAS—by fitting spacecraft ranging observations. The total mass of the Kuiper belt was calculated as the sum of the masses of the 31 largest trans-neptunian objects directly included in the simultaneous integration and the estimated mass of the model of the discrete ring of TNO. The total mass −2 is (1.97 ± 0.30) · 10 m⊕. The gravitational influence of the Kuiper belt on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune exceeds at times the attraction of the hypothetical 9th planet with a mass of ∼ 10 m⊕ at the distances assumed for it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solar System
    5 The Solar System R. Lynne Jones, Steven R. Chesley, Paul A. Abell, Michael E. Brown, Josef Durech,ˇ Yanga R. Fern´andez,Alan W. Harris, Matt J. Holman, Zeljkoˇ Ivezi´c,R. Jedicke, Mikko Kaasalainen, Nathan A. Kaib, Zoran Kneˇzevi´c,Andrea Milani, Alex Parker, Stephen T. Ridgway, David E. Trilling, Bojan Vrˇsnak LSST will provide huge advances in our knowledge of millions of astronomical objects “close to home’”– the small bodies in our Solar System. Previous studies of these small bodies have led to dramatic changes in our understanding of the process of planet formation and evolution, and the relationship between our Solar System and other systems. Beyond providing asteroid targets for space missions or igniting popular interest in observing a new comet or learning about a new distant icy dwarf planet, these small bodies also serve as large populations of “test particles,” recording the dynamical history of the giant planets, revealing the nature of the Solar System impactor population over time, and illustrating the size distributions of planetesimals, which were the building blocks of planets. In this chapter, a brief introduction to the different populations of small bodies in the Solar System (§ 5.1) is followed by a summary of the number of objects of each population that LSST is expected to find (§ 5.2). Some of the Solar System science that LSST will address is presented through the rest of the chapter, starting with the insights into planetary formation and evolution gained through the small body population orbital distributions (§ 5.3). The effects of collisional evolution in the Main Belt and Kuiper Belt are discussed in the next two sections, along with the implications for the determination of the size distribution in the Main Belt (§ 5.4) and possibilities for identifying wide binaries and understanding the environment in the early outer Solar System in § 5.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Pre-Proof
    Journal Pre-proof A statistical review of light curves and the prevalence of contact binaries in the Kuiper Belt Mark R. Showalter, Susan D. Benecchi, Marc W. Buie, William M. Grundy, James T. Keane, Carey M. Lisse, Cathy B. Olkin, Simon B. Porter, Stuart J. Robbins, Kelsi N. Singer, Anne J. Verbiscer, Harold A. Weaver, Amanda M. Zangari, Douglas P. Hamilton, David E. Kaufmann, Tod R. Lauer, D.S. Mehoke, T.S. Mehoke, J.R. Spencer, H.B. Throop, J.W. Parker, S. Alan Stern, the New Horizons Geology, Geophysics, and Imaging Team PII: S0019-1035(20)30444-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114098 Reference: YICAR 114098 To appear in: Icarus Received date: 25 November 2019 Revised date: 30 August 2020 Accepted date: 1 September 2020 Please cite this article as: M.R. Showalter, S.D. Benecchi, M.W. Buie, et al., A statistical review of light curves and the prevalence of contact binaries in the Kuiper Belt, Icarus (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114098 This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Ice in 2060 Chiron and Its Implications for Centaurs and Kuiper Belt Objects
    Water Ice in 2060 Chiron and its Implications for Centaurs and Kuiper Belt Objects Jane X. Luu Sterrewacht Leiden Postbus 9513, 2300RA Leiden, The Netherlands David C. Jewitt1 Institute for Astronomy 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822 and Chad Trujillo1 Institute for Astronomy 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822 Received ; accepted Submitted to Ap. J. Letters, accepted 31 Jan 2000 1Visiting Astronomer, W. M. Keck Observatory, jointly operated by California Institute of Technology and the University of California. –2– ABSTRACT We report the detection of water ice in the Centaur 2060 Chiron, based on near-infrared spectra (1.0 - 2.5 µm) taken with the 3.8-meter United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) and the 10-meter Keck Telescope. The appearance of this ice is correlated with the recent decline in Chiron’s cometary activity: the decrease in the coma cross-section allows previously hidden solid-state surface features to be seen. We predict that water ice is ubiquitous among Centaurs and Kuiper Belt objects, but its surface coverage varies from object to object, and thus determines its detectability and the occurrence of cometary activity. Subject headings: comets – Kuiper Belt – solar system: formation 1. Introduction The Centaurs are a set of solar system objects whose orbits are confined between those of Jupiter and Neptune. Their planet-crossing orbits imply a short dynamical lifetime (106 107 yr). The current belief is that Centaurs are objects scattered from the Kuiper − Belt that may eventually end up in the inner solar system as short-period comets. The first discovered and brightest known Centaur, 2060 Chiron, is relatively well studied.
    [Show full text]