Molecular Pharmacology of Metabotropic Receptors Targeted by Neuropsychiatric Drugs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Molecular Pharmacology of Metabotropic Receptors Targeted by Neuropsychiatric Drugs Molecular pharmacology of metabotropic receptors targeted by neuropsychiatric drugs Bryan L. Roth Metabotropic receptors are responsible for so-called ‘slow synaptic transmission’ and mediate the effects of hundreds of pep- tide and non-peptide neurotransmitters and neuromodulators. Over the past decade or so, a revolution in membrane-protein structural determination has clarified the molecular determinants responsible for the actions of these receptors. This Review focuses on the G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are targets of neuropsychiatric drugs and shows how insights into the structure and function of these important synaptic proteins are accelerating understanding of their actions. Notably, elucidat- ing the structure and function of GPCRs should enhance the structure-guided discovery of novel chemical tools with which to manipulate and understand these synaptic proteins. eurotransmitter receptors are essential for mediating the GPCRs, which have complex actions mediated by second messen- effects of neurotransmitters in the brain and peripheral gers and protein kinases21,22 (Fig. 1). Nnervous system. There are generally considered to be two This Review will discuss how structural insights into neurotrans- types of neurotransmitter receptors: ionotropic and metabotropic. mitter GPCRs have transformed the understanding of these recep- While ionotropic receptors are typically ligand-gated ion chan- tors, focusing on example GPCRs that are targets of drugs approved nels, through which ions pass in response to a neurotransmitter, for use in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. The past metabotropic receptors need G proteins and second messengers to decade has witnessed remarkable progress in elucidating the struc- indirectly modulate ionic activity in neurons. G protein–coupled ture and function of GPCR family, with perhaps 60 or so GPCRs receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of metabotropic having their structures determined by X-ray crystallography7 or receptors, although receptor tyrosine kinases1 and guanylate cyclase cryo-EM7. Additionally, various intermediate signaling states, receptors2,3 can also be considered metabotropic receptors4. GPCRs ranging from inactive to active, have been elucidated for exem- also constitute the largest family of druggable targets5,6 encoded by plar GPCRs6. Finally, progress has been made on the use of such the human genome, and 34% of medications approved by the US structural information for structure-guided and structure-inspired Food and Drug Administration have GPCRs as their main thera- neuropsychiatric drug discovery8. This Review will provide an over- peutic target7,8, especially those used for the treatment of neuropsy- view of the understanding of how structure informs the function chiatric disorders6,9,10 (Table 1). of representative neurotransmitter GPCRs. It will also show how There are many distinct chemical classes of neurotransmitters, an understanding of structure elucidates neuropharmacology and including the following: (1) small molecules (e.g., glutamate, nor- will highlight therapeutic challenges and opportunities for neuro- epinephrine and serotonin); (2) neuropeptides (e.g., enkephalins, transmitter-targeted GPCRs. endorphins and neurokinins); and (3) others, including metabolites (e.g., endocannabinoids, ATP, ADP and adenosine) and gases (e.g., Structural genomics of neurotransmitter-targeted GPCRs nitric oxide). Although the precise number of brain neurotransmit- Structural genomics has been defined as the approach that proposes ters is not known with certainty, it is likely that hundreds of distinct ‘determining protein structures on a genome-wide scale’23, which neurotransmitters exist, including many ‘orphan’ neuropeptides11. boils down to ultimately determining the three-dimensional struc- Each neurotransmitter system has distinct cellular and region-spe- ture of every protein encoded by the human genome. Obtaining cific distribution patterns in the brain; these can be visualized at the GPCR structures has been historically challenging. Thus, although mRNA level with the Allen Brain Atlas12 or via genetically encoded low-resolution structures of rhodopsin were available as early as markers with the GENSAT (Gene Expression Nervous System 1993 (ref. 24), and useful models of helical arrangements were gen- Atlas) resource13. Almost all neurotransmitters transduce their sig- erated through the use of that information25, the first bona fide nals at least in part by activating GPCRs, and the regional and cellu- high-resolution GPCR structure was not achieved until 2000, with lar distributions of brain GPCR mRNAs are well described12,14. As is rhodopsin26. The first non-opsin GPCR structures were obtained the case with neurotransmitters, each of the metabotropic receptors in 2007 (refs. 27–29), and since then, structures have been obtained, for neurotransmitters has a distinct regional and cellular distribu- mainly via X-ray crystallography, for around 60 distinct human tion in the brain12,14 and elsewhere14. GPCRs7 (Fig. 2a). To generate useful structures, GPCR crystallog- GPCRs modulate synaptic transmission via so-called ‘slow raphy typically requires high-affinity ligands, which serve to stabi- synaptic transmission’15, which occurs in a time frame of seconds lize the receptor in a distinct state suitable for crystallography. Such to minutes in the central nervous system. Metabotropic receptors compounds not only need to be of high affinity (e.g., in the low such as GPCRs may be found pre- and post-synaptically. Pre-synaptic nanomolar to picomolar range) but also need to have slow dissocia- 30 Gi-coupled GPCRs, such as the 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B serotonin tion rates . Ideally, then, to obtain complete structural coverage of receptors16,17, inhibit neurotransmitter release via Gβ/γ-mediated all GPCRs encoded by the human genome, one would need high- activation of inhibitory channels, such as G protein–coupled affinity, slowly dissociating ligands for each of them. Such ligands inwardly rectifying potassium channels18, and via the inhibition of do not necessarily need to be specific, as, for example, the non- vesicle-docking SNARE-like proteins19,20 (Fig. 1). Post-synaptically, selective drug ergotamine has been used to obtain the structures of 31 GPCRs can enhance neuronal excitability via Gs- and Gq-coupled three different serotonin receptor subtypes: 5-HT1B (ref. , 5-HT2B Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill 27514 NC, USA. e-mail: [email protected] Table 1 | Representative metabotropic neurotransmitter receptors as targets for neuropsychiatric disorders and drugs of abuse T arget class Neurotransmitter Receptor Representative Therapeutic indications or Pharmacological Structure medication abuse action determined (ref.) GPCR Dopamine D2 dopamine Ropinirole Parkinson’s Disease Agonist 75 GPCR Dopamine D2 dopamine Nemonapride Schizophrenia Antagonist/ 75 inverse agonist GPCR Serotonin 5-HT2C serotonin Lorcaserin Obesity Agonist 33 GPCR Serotonin 5-HT1A serotonin Buspirone Anxiety and depression Partial agonist None reported GPCR Serotonin 5-HT1B Ergotamine Migraine headaches Antagonist 31,32 GPCR Adenosine A2A adenosine Caffeine Alertness Antagonist 131 GPCR Norepinephrine β1 and β2 Propranolol Post-traumatic stress Inverse agonist 132,133 adrenergic disorder; anxiety disorders GPCR Serotonin 5-HT2A serotonin Pimavanserin Psychosis related to Inverse agonist 134 Parkinson’s Disease GPCR Serotonin Many 5-HT LSD Hallucinogen use and Agonist 70 receptors abuse GPCR Endocannabinoids CB1 cannabinoid Tetrahydrocannibinol Anorexia related to cancer Agonist 135 chemotherapy; cannabis abuse GPCR GABA GABA-B Baclofen Spasticity-related Agonist None reported movement disorders GPCR Histamine H1-histamine Diphenhydramine Sedative Antagonist 41 GPCR Endorphins; μ-opioid Morphine Pain; abused opioid Agonist 59,136 endomorphans GPCR Dynorphin κ-opioid Nalfurafine Itch Agonist 52,137 GPCR Dynorphin κ-opioid Salvinorin A Hallucinogen use and Agonist 52,137 abuse GPCR Orexin OX1 orexin Suvorexant Insomnia Antagonist 138 GPCR Norepinephrine α2 adrenergic Clonidine Anxiety; opioid withdrawal Agonist None reported GPCR S1P1 sphingosine Fingolimod Multiple sclerosis Downregulates 139 antagonist receptor Receptor Nerve growth TRK Entrectinib Cancers including Antagonist No full-length tyrosine factors astrocytoma structure kinase reported Guanylate Atrial natriuretic NPRA atrial Atrial natriuretic None (heart failure) Agonist 140 cyclases peptide natriuretic receptor peptide GABA, γ-amino butyric acid. 32 33 40 (ref. ) and 5-HT2C (ref. ). Once structures are obtained, even with ligand-free state has been solved —those GPCRs for which there non-selective ligands, the structural features for distinct pharmaco- are reported structures typically have hundreds to thousands of logical properties can be elucidated (as in refs. 32,33). Furthermore, annotated ligands (Fig. 2a). No clear relationship exists between obtaining structures of related GPCRs frequently facilitates the the number of annotated ligands in Chembl and the number structure-guided discovery and design of subtype-selective drugs34. of distinct structures (Fig. 2b), although, as mentioned above, An analysis of available GPCR structures and cognate ligands, high-affinity, slowly dissociating ligands are typically key for done with open-source databases of small molecules that bind obtaining structures. Thus, comprehensive elucidation
Recommended publications
  • Applying Screening Techniques to Two Orphan Gpcrs
    Universidade de Lisboa Faculdade de Farmácia Deorphanization of receptors: Applying screening techniques to two orphan GPCRs Ana Catarina Rufas da Silva Santos Mestrado Integrado em Ciências Farmacêuticas 2019 Universidade de Lisboa Faculdade de Farmácia Deorphanization of receptors: Applying screening techniques to two orphan GPCRs Ana Catarina Rufas da Silva Santos Monografia de Mestrado Integrado em Ciências Farmacêuticas apresentada à Universidade de Lisboa através da Faculdade de Farmácia Orientadora: Ghazl Al Hamwi, PhD Student Co-Orientadora: Professora Doutora Elsa Maria Ribeiro dos Santos Anes, Professora Associada com Agregação em Microbiologia 2019 Abstract G-Protein Coupled Receptors represent one of the largest families of cellular receptors discovered and one of the main sources of attractive drug targets. In contrast, it also has a large number of understudied or orphan receptors. Pharmacological assays such as β-Arrestin recruitment assays, are one of the possible approaches for deorphanization of receptors. In this work, I applied the assay system previously mentioned to screen compounds in two orphan receptors, GRP37 and MRGPRX3. GPR37 has been primarily associated with a form of early onset Parkinsonism due to its’ expression patterns, and physiological role as substrate to ubiquitin E3, parkin. Although extensive literature regarding this receptor is available, the identification of a universally recognized ligand has not yet been possible. Two compounds were proposed as ligands, but both were met with controversy. These receptor association with Autosomal Recessive Juvenile Parkinson positions it as a very attractive drug target, and as such its’ deorphanization is a prime objective for investigators in this area. Regarding MRGPRX3 information is much scarcer.
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE 1 Studies of Antagonist Activity in Constitutively Active
    TABLE 1 Studies of antagonist activity in constitutively active receptors systems shown to demonstrate inverse agonism for at least one ligand Targets are natural Gs and constitutively active mutants (CAM) of GPCRs. Of 380 antagonists, 85% of the ligands demonstrate inverse agonism. Receptor Neutral Antagonist Inverse Agonist Reference Human β2-adrenergic Dichloroisoproterenol, pindolol, labetolol, timolol, Chidiac et al., 1996; Azzi et alprenolol, propranolol, ICI 118,551, cyanopindolol al., 2001 Turkey erythrocyte β-adrenergic Propranolol, pindolol Gotze et al., 1994 Human β2-adrenergic (CAM) Propranolol Betaxolol, ICI 118,551, sotalol, timolol Samama et al., 1994; Stevens and Milligan, 1998 Human/guinea pig β1-adrenergic Atenolol, propranolol Mewes et al., 1993 Human β1-adrenergic Carvedilol CGP20712A, metoprolol, bisoprolol Engelhardt et al., 2001 Rat α2D-adrenergic Rauwolscine, yohimbine, WB 4101, idazoxan, Tian et al., 1994 phentolamine, Human α2A-adrenergic Napthazoline, Rauwolscine, idazoxan, altipamezole, levomedetomidine, Jansson et al., 1998; Pauwels MPV-2088 (–)RX811059, RX 831003 et al., 2002 Human α2C-adrenergic RX821002, yohimbine Cayla et al., 1999 Human α2D-adrenergic Prazosin McCune et al., 2000 Rat α2-adrenoceptor MK912 RX821002 Murrin et al., 2000 Porcine α2A adrenoceptor (CAM- Idazoxan Rauwolscine, yohimbine, RX821002, MK912, Wade et al., 2001 T373K) phentolamine Human α2A-adrenoceptor (CAM) Dexefaroxan, (+)RX811059, (–)RX811059, RS15385, yohimbine, Pauwels et al., 2000 atipamezole fluparoxan, WB 4101 Hamster α1B-adrenergic
    [Show full text]
  • Ligand-Gated Chloride Channels Are Receptors for Biogenic Amines in C
    Ligand-Gated Chloride Channels Are Receptors for Biogenic Amines in C. elegans The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Ringstad, N., N. Abe, and H. R. Horvitz. “Ligand-Gated Chloride Channels Are Receptors for Biogenic Amines in C. elegans.” Science 325, no. 5936 (July 2, 2009): 96-100. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1169243 Publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84506 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Science. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 25. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Science. 2009 July 3; 325(5936): 96±100. doi:10.1126/science.1169243. Ligand-gated chloride channels are receptors for biogenic amines in C. elegans Niels Ringstad1,2, Namiko Abe1,2,3, and H. Robert Horvitz1 1HHMI, Department of Biology and McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge MA 02139 Abstract Biogenic amines such as serotonin and dopamine are intercellular signaling molecules that function widely as neurotransmitters and neuromodulators. We have identified in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans three ligand-gated chloride channels that are receptors for biogenic amines: LGC-53 is a high-affinity dopamine receptor, LGC-55 is a high-affinity tyramine receptor, and LGC-40 is a low-affinity serotonin receptor that is also gated by choline and acetylcholine.
    [Show full text]
  • 4695389.Pdf (3.200Mb)
    Non-classical amine recognition evolved in a large clade of olfactory receptors The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Li, Qian, Yaw Tachie-Baffour, Zhikai Liu, Maude W Baldwin, Andrew C Kruse, and Stephen D Liberles. 2015. “Non-classical amine recognition evolved in a large clade of olfactory receptors.” eLife 4 (1): e10441. doi:10.7554/eLife.10441. http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/ eLife.10441. Published Version doi:10.7554/eLife.10441 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:23993622 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA RESEARCH ARTICLE Non-classical amine recognition evolved in a large clade of olfactory receptors Qian Li1, Yaw Tachie-Baffour1, Zhikai Liu1, Maude W Baldwin2, Andrew C Kruse3, Stephen D Liberles1* 1Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States; 2Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States; 3Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States Abstract Biogenic amines are important signaling molecules, and the structural basis for their recognition by G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) is well understood. Amines are also potent odors, with some activating olfactory trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs). Here, we report that teleost TAARs evolved a new way to recognize amines in a non-classical orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list Citation for published version: Davenport, AP, Alexander, SPH, Sharman, JL, Pawson, AJ, Benson, HE, Monaghan, AE, Liew, WC, Mpamhanga, CP, Bonner, TI, Neubig, RR, Pin, JP, Spedding, M & Harmar, AJ 2013, 'International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list: recommendations for new pairings with cognate ligands', Pharmacological reviews, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 967-86. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007179 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1124/pr.112.007179 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Pharmacological reviews Publisher Rights Statement: U.S. Government work not protected by U.S. copyright General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 1521-0081/65/3/967–986$25.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007179 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Pharmacol Rev 65:967–986, July 2013 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Zebrafish Behavioral Profiling Links Drugs to Biological Targets and Rest/Wake Regulation
    www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/327/5963/348/DC1 Supporting Online Material for Zebrafish Behavioral Profiling Links Drugs to Biological Targets and Rest/Wake Regulation Jason Rihel,* David A. Prober, Anthony Arvanites, Kelvin Lam, Steven Zimmerman, Sumin Jang, Stephen J. Haggarty, David Kokel, Lee L. Rubin, Randall T. Peterson, Alexander F. Schier* *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] (A.F.S.); [email protected] (J.R.) Published 15 January 2010, Science 327, 348 (2010) DOI: 10.1126/science.1183090 This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods SOM Text Figs. S1 to S18 Table S1 References Supporting Online Material Table of Contents Materials and Methods, pages 2-4 Supplemental Text 1-7, pages 5-10 Text 1. Psychotropic Drug Discovery, page 5 Text 2. Dose, pages 5-6 Text 3. Therapeutic Classes of Drugs Induce Correlated Behaviors, page 6 Text 4. Polypharmacology, pages 6-7 Text 5. Pharmacological Conservation, pages 7-9 Text 6. Non-overlapping Regulation of Rest/Wake States, page 9 Text 7. High Throughput Behavioral Screening in Practice, page 10 Supplemental Figure Legends, pages 11-14 Figure S1. Expanded hierarchical clustering analysis, pages 15-18 Figure S2. Hierarchical and k-means clustering yield similar cluster architectures, page 19 Figure S3. Expanded k-means clustergram, pages 20-23 Figure S4. Behavioral fingerprints are stable across a range of doses, page 24 Figure S5. Compounds that share biological targets have highly correlated behavioral fingerprints, page 25 Figure S6. Examples of compounds that share biological targets and/or structural similarity that give similar behavioral profiles, page 26 Figure S7.
    [Show full text]
  • )&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE
    [Show full text]
  • A Benchmarking Study on Virtual Ligand Screening Against Homology Models of Human Gpcrs
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/284075; this version posted March 19, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. A benchmarking study on virtual ligand screening against homology models of human GPCRs Victor Jun Yu Lima,b, Weina Dua, Yu Zong Chenc, Hao Fana,d aBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 30 Biopolis Street, Matrix No. 07-01, 138671, Singapore; bSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, 117549, Singapore; cDepartment of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, 117543, Singapore; dDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117558 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dr. Hao Fan, Bioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 30 Biopolis Street, Matrix No. 07-01, 138671, Singapore; Telephone: +65 64788500; Email: [email protected] Keywords: G-protein-coupled receptor, GPCR, X-ray crystallography, virtual screening, homology modelling, consensus enrichment 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/284075; this version posted March 19, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) is an important target class of proteins for drug discovery, with over 27% of FDA-approved drugs targeting GPCRs. However, being a membrane protein, it is difficult to obtain the 3D crystal structures of GPCRs for virtual screening of ligands by molecular docking.
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolite Sensing Gpcrs: Promising Therapeutic Targets for Cancer Treatment?
    cells Review Metabolite Sensing GPCRs: Promising Therapeutic Targets for Cancer Treatment? Jesús Cosín-Roger 1,*, Dolores Ortiz-Masia 2 , Maria Dolores Barrachina 3 and Sara Calatayud 3 1 Hospital Dr. Peset, Fundación para la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana, FISABIO, 46017 Valencia, Spain 2 Departament of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] 3 Departament of Pharmacology and CIBER, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] (M.D.B.); [email protected] (S.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-963851234 Received: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 21 October 2020; Published: 23 October 2020 Abstract: G-protein-coupled receptors constitute the most diverse and largest receptor family in the human genome, with approximately 800 different members identified. Given the well-known metabolic alterations in cancer development, we will focus specifically in the 19 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which can be selectively activated by metabolites. These metabolite sensing GPCRs control crucial processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and survival after their activation. In the present review, we will describe the main functions of these metabolite sensing GPCRs and shed light on the benefits of their potential use as possible pharmacological targets for cancer treatment. Keywords: G-protein-coupled receptor; metabolite sensing GPCR; cancer 1. Introduction G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are characterized by a seven-transmembrane configuration, constitute the largest and most ubiquitous family of plasma membrane receptors, and regulate virtually all known physiological processes in humans [1,2]. This family includes almost one thousand genes that were initially classified on the basis of sequence homology into six classes (A–F), where classes D and E were not found in vertebrates [3].
    [Show full text]
  • The Proton-Activated G Protein Coupled Receptor OGR1 Acutely Regulates the Activity of Epithelial Proton Transport Proteins
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 The proton-activated G protein coupled receptor OGR1 acutely regulates the activity of epithelial proton transport proteins Mohebbi, Nilufar ; Benabbas, Chahira ; Vidal, Solange ; Daryadel, Arezoo ; Bourgeois, Soline ; Velic, Ana ; Ludwig, Marie-Gabrielle ; Seuwen, Klaus ; Wagner, Carsten A Abstract: The Ovarian cancer G protein-coupled Receptor 1 (OGR1; GPR68) is proton-sensitive in the pH range of 6.8 - 7.8. However, its physiological function is not defined to date. OGR1 signals via inositol trisphosphate and intracellular calcium, albeit downstream events are unclear. To elucidate OGR1 function further, we transfected HEK293 cells with active OGR1 receptor or a mutant lacking 5 histidine residues (H5Phe-OGR1). An acute switch of extracellular pH from 8 to 7.1 (10 nmol/l vs 90 nmol/l protons) stimulated NHE and H(+)-ATPase activity in OGR1-transfected cells, but not in H5Phe-OGR1-transfected cells. ZnCl(2) and CuCl(2) that both inhibit OGR1 reduced the stimulatory effect. The activity was blocked by chelerythrine, whereas the ERK1/2 inhibitor PD 098059 hadno inhibitory effect. OGR1 activation increased intracellular calcium in transfected HEK293 cells. Wenext isolated proximal tubules from kidneys of wild-type and OGR1-deficient mice and measured the effect of extracellular pH on NHE activity in vitro. Deletion of OGR1 affected the pH-dependent proton extrusion, however, in the opposite direction as expected from cell culture experiments. Upregulated expression of the pH-sensitive kinase Pyk2 in OGR1 KO mouse proximal tubule cells may compensate for the loss of OGR1.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive, Structurally-Curated Alignment and Phylogeny of Vertebrate Biogenic Amine Receptors
    A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 17 February 2015. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/773), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. Spielman SJ, Kumar K, Wilke CO. 2015. Comprehensive, structurally-informed alignment and phylogeny of vertebrate biogenic amine receptors. PeerJ 3:e773 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.773 Comprehensive, structurally-curated alignment and phylogeny of vertebrate biogenic amine receptors Stephanie J. Spielman1,2,3, Keerthana Kumar1,2,3, and Claus O. Wilke1,2,3 1Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, U.S.A. 2Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, U.S.A. 3Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Biogenic amine receptors play critical roles in regulating behavior and physiology, particularly within the central nervous system, in both vertebrates and invertebrates. These receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family and interact with endogenous bioamine ligands, such as dopamine, serotonin, and epinephrine, and they are targeted by a wide array of pharmaceuticals. Despite these receptors’ clear clinical and biological importance, their evolutionary history remains poorly characterized. In particular, the relationships among biogenic amine receptors and any specific evolutionary constraints acting within distinct receptor subtypes are largely unknown. To advance and facilitate studies in this receptor family, we have constructed a comprehensive, high-quality, structurally-curated sequence alignment of vertebrate biogenic PrePrints amine receptors. We demonstrate that aligning GPCR sequences without considering structure produces an alignment with substantial error, whereas a structurally-aware approach greatly improves alignment accuracy.
    [Show full text]