Technical Paper Reference Handbook Asset Optimization / Schlumberger Software
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Business Overview of PRODML
Business Overview of PRODML This document introduces the PRODML™ family of standards and provides an overview of what they are for and how and why they were developed. What is PRODML? The software applications used to support production workflows are available from multiple vendors. However, they cannot be integrated easily because they typically have their own data structures and incompatible designs. This leads to high cost of integration, a proliferation of point to point links, high cost of maintenance and poor flexibility to cope with change. PRODML is the name of an industry initiative to provide standard interfaces between software tools used to monitor, manage and optimize hydrocarbon production. It is also the name of the family of web services and data exchange standards that the initiative has created. The purpose of PRODML is to increase innovation in the composition of optimization solutions for production systems while reducing cost and risk. This translates into enabling the development of plug compatible software by energy sector vendors as well as energy companies. The PRODML standards form a framework within which energy companies can configure processes related to operations, optimization, reporting, and/or information management. PRODML enables the vision of Digital Oil Fields of the Future PRODML reduces the lifetime cost of information exchange in the Energy industry. PRODML standards are key components in today's IT Enterprise Architectures PRODML schemas standardize information exchange The PRODML standards are managed by energy companies and vendors participating in the PRODML Special Interest Group (SIG) that is facilitated by the Energistics consortium. PRODML supports workflows for Production Operations and Optimization PRODML focuses on production workflows from the reservoir-wellbore boundary to the custody transfer point, and on production optimization decisions that can be effected within a day. -
Energistics Update
Energistics Update Jerry Hubbard Chief Operating Officer PPDM 9 March 2011 The Challenge of Standardization • Strategic Perspective – Strategic Standardization Management • Standards Collaboration – Focus on highest value standards that don‟t impact competition • Industry Commitment – Internal and external commitment to implementation • Value Delivery – Measuring the business value of implementation Our Flagship Standards… Wellsite Information Transfer Standard Markup Language “The „right-time‟ seamless flow of well-site data between operators and service companies to speed and enhance decision-making” An Open Information Transfer Standard for the Oilfield WITSML Data Object Schemas (XML) General •Coordinate Ref Sys Communication •Well •Drill Report •Subscription •Message •Attachment •Server Capabilities •Operations Report •StimJob •Real Time Rig Instrumentation •Wellbore •Rig / Rig Equipment •Wellbore Geometry •Cement Job •Risk Surface Logging Fluids Systems •Mud Log •Fluids Report Surveying Coring •Survey Program •Sidewall Core •Target •Conventional Core •Trajectory Logging While Directional Drilling Drilling Systems •Log Well Log (includes Wireline) •Tubular / •Formation Marker •Bit Record Original •BHA Run Updated Added Source: BakerHughes/Paradigm WITSML SIG: Member Companies • Accenture • IDS • Petris Technology • Atman Consulting • Institut Francais du Petrole • Petrolink • Baker Hughes • INT • Pioneer Natural Res. • Beijing Sunny Tech • Kongsberg • Roxar • BJ Services • LIOS Technology • RPS Group • BP • Mahindra Satyam • Saudi -
Collaborative Technologies for Exploration
COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR EXPLORATION Authors: Randy Clark, Jerry Hubbard (Energistics) Presented by: Paul Maton (Energistics and Sillimanite Consultants) Upstream Standards. Bottom Line Results. Introduction to Energistics • An open standards industry consortium • Twenty years serving the upstream industry • With 100 active members… – Integrated, independent & national energy companies – Oilfield service and professional service companies – Software, hardware and integration vendors – Regulatory agencies, institutes and media partners Our Energy Standards Resource Centre Our Energy Company Members Our Government Agency Members Our Energistics Community • Global Regions: – Africa (South Africa, Angola, Equatorial Guinea, Nigeria…) – Asia Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, Vietnam, Philippines…) – Eastern Europe (Russia, Kazakhstan and non-EU states) – Latin America (Mexico, Central and South America) – Middle East (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Oman, Bahrain…) – North America (United States and Canada) – South Asia (India, Australia, Malaysia, Pakistan…) – Western Europe (European Union and Norway) The Challenge of Standardization • Strategic Perspective – Strategic Standardization Management • Standards Collaboration – Focus on highest value standards that don’t impact competition • Industry Commitment – Internal and external commitment to implementation • Value Delivery – Measuring business value of implementation vs. the cost of not making standardization a strategic goal Importance of Open Data Exchange Standards • Optimising highly instrumented -
Purpose, Intended Use and Evolution
Purpose, Intended Use and Evolution PRODML™ Enabling Production Operations, Optimization, Reporting and Data Management for the Exploration and Production (E&P) Domain. Version: PRODML Version 1.1 Abstract This document comprises a high level overview of the PRODML standard. It explains the background to the development of the initial version of the standard, the business problems addressed, and the pilot implementations used to develop and test the standard. A brief description of the PRODML architecture and embedded standards is included. Prepared by: Energistics and the PRODML SIG Date published: 6 March 2009 Document type: Specification Keywords: web services, production, interoperability Purpose, Intended Use and Evolution - PRODML Version 1.1 Document Information DOCUMENT VERSION: 1.1 DATE: 6 March 2009 Technical Color: R: 210 G:124, B50 Language US English This document was produced by Energistics and the PRODML SIG Energistics™, POSC®, Epicentre®, WITSML™, PRODML™, Upstream Standards. Bottom Line Results.™, The Energy Standards Resource Centre™ and their logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of Energistics. Access, receipt, and/or use of these documents and all Energistics materials are generally available to the public and are specifically governed by the Energistics Product Licensing Agreement (http://www.energistics.org/posc/Product_License_Agreement.asp) Page 2 of 14 Purpose, Intended Use and Evolution - PRODML Version 1.1 Amendment History Version Date Comment By V1.1 6 March Prepared for final release. Gary Masters 2009 V1.1 Dec 2008 Revised for 1.1 release Robin Getty V 1.0 11/13/2006 Improvements based upon R. Cutler’s feedback Jake Booth V1.0 11/06/2006 Clarified comments on “Plug and Play” Jake Booth RC_1.0 08/30/2006 Release Candidate Jake Booth 0.91 08/24/2006 Added Documentation Mapping Jerry Blaker 0.80 08/21/2006 Create First Draft Jerry Blaker Page 3 of 14 Purpose, Intended Use and Evolution - PRODML Version 1.1 Table of Contents Preface 5 1. -
Application of Remote Real-Time Monitoring to Offshore Oil and Gas Operations
Transportation Research Board Special Report 322 Application of Remote Real-Time Monitoring to Offshore Oil and Gas Operations Prepublication Copy • Uncorrected Proofs TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2016 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* Chair: James M. Crites, Executive Vice President of Operations, Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport, Texas Vice Chair: Paul Trombino III, Director, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames Executive Director: Neil J. Pedersen, Transportation Research Board Victoria A. Arroyo, Executive Director, Georgetown Climate Center; Assistant Dean, Centers and Institutes; and Professor and Director, Environmental Law Program, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. Scott E. Bennett, Director, Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, Little Rock Jennifer Cohan, Secretary, Delaware Department of Transportation, Dover Malcolm Dougherty, Director, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento A. Stewart Fotheringham, Professor, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe John S. Halikowski, Director, Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix Susan Hanson, Distinguished University Professor Emerita, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts Steve Heminger, Executive Director, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, California Chris T. Hendrickson, Hamerschlag Professor of Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Jeffrey D. Holt, Managing Director, Power, Energy, and Infrastructure Group, BMO -
2019 “State of Energistics” Orientation
2019 “STATE OF ENERGISTICS” ORIENTATION Jana Schey, COO Jay Hollingsworth, CTO January 31, 2019 1 February 2019©2019 Energistics Inc. 1 Introductions Philip Neri Jana Schey Jay Hollingsworth Marketing Director Chief Operating Officer Chief Technology Officer 1 February 2019 ©2019 Energistics Inc. 2 Agenda » About Energistics » Standards Overview » 2019 Plans » How We Work » Q&A 1 February 2019 ©2019 Energistics Inc. 3 About Energistics 1 February 2019 ©2019 Energistics Inc. 4 Energistics…past and present » Energistics is not a vendor. We are a non-profit industry organization. » Our role is to help companies manage and share data more efficiently and cost-effectively by using industry-defined data exchange standards » We have served the industry for more than 25 years » Our 110+ members include leading E&P companies, oilfield service companies, software vendors, system integrators, regulatory agencies » Our standards are the result of open collaboration between members, facilitated by Energistics » In short, the standards are created by the industry and for the industry 1 February 2019 ©2019 Energistics Inc. 5 Our Current Members – Come Join Us! 1 February 2019 © 2019 Energistics 6 Standards Overview 1 February 2019 ©2019 Energistics Inc. 7 Energistics’ Spectrum of Standards UNIVERSAL INTEROPERABILITY • Defined by collaboration between member SMEs DRILLING/WELL PRODUCTION RESERVOIR • Coherent set of standards to eliminate data ‘friction’ • Goal is to cover all key activities in upstream • Shared components enable cross-functional workflows Energistics Transfer Protocol (ETP) Common Technical Architecture (CTA) 1 February 2019 ©2019 Energistics Inc 8 Well Information Standards: WITSML™ » Consistent high-quality transfer of wellbore Reference and drilling-related data Well 1532-e • Real-time data transfer Reports Growing Reference objects – Well and Wellbore Growing objects – Log (time, depth), Trajectory, Mud Log, etc. -
Gazele De Șist: Între Nevoi Energetice Și Standarde De Mediu
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Papatulică, Mariana; Prisecaru, Petre; Ivan, Valentina Research Report Gazele de şist: Între nevoi energetice şi standarde de mediu Strategy and Policy Studies (SPOS), No. 2014,2 Provided in Cooperation with: European Institute of Romania, Bucharest Suggested Citation: Papatulică, Mariana; Prisecaru, Petre; Ivan, Valentina (2015) : Gazele de şist: Între nevoi energetice şi standarde de mediu, Strategy and Policy Studies (SPOS), No. 2014,2, ISBN 978-606-8202-44-0, European Institute of Romania, Bucharest This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/141820 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Bd. Regina Elisabeta nr. 7-9, Sector 3, Bucureşti GAZELEGAZELE DEDE ŞIST:ŞIST: [email protected]; www.ier.ro . -
PDF Is a ‘Pretty Awful’ Source for Text
Volume 24 N° 1 Oil Information Technology Journal 245th Issue In This Issue PODS Data Exchange Specification vs. PipelineML ................................................................ 2 Emerson white paper positions the digital twin at the heart of the digital transformation. ... 3 On the funding of digital initiatives and on what constitutes a ‘real’ job ............................... 4 Review: ARMA’s Information governance body of knowledge .............................................. 6 Energistics overview and plans ............................................................................................. 8 Software, hardware short takes ........................................................................................... 8 Kubernetes ‘a popular route to performant, cloud-agnostic deployment’ ............................ 12 Recent announcements on artificial intelligence in oil and gas and elsewhere ..................... 13 Esri 2018 European Petroleum User Group ......................................................................... 14 Folks, facts, orgs ... ............................................................................................................. 20 Standards stuff .................................................................................................................. 25 The Internet of Things, an investigation .............................................................................. 26 Safety first ... .................................................................................................................... -
Application of Remote Real-Time Monitoring to Offshore Oil and Gas Operations
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/23499 SHARE Application of Remote Real-Time Monitoring to Offshore Oil and Gas Operations DETAILS 117 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-44242-8 | DOI 10.17226/23499 AUTHORS BUY THIS BOOK Committee on the Application of Real-Time Monitoring of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations; Policy Studies; Transportation Research Board; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine FIND RELATED TITLES Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Application of Remote Real-Time Monitoring to Offshore Oil and Gas Operations TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD SPECIAL REPORT 322 Application of Remote Real-Time Monitoring to Offshore Oil and Gas Operations Committee on the Application of Real-Time Monitoring of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations Transportation Research Board Transportation Research Board Washington, D.C. 2016 www.TRB.org Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Application of Remote Real-Time Monitoring to Offshore Oil and Gas Operations Transportation Research Board Special Report 322 Subscriber Categories Policy; data and information technology; energy Transportation Research Board publications are available by ordering individual publi- cations directly from the TRB Business Office, through the Internet at www.TRB.org or nationalacademies.org/trb, or by annual subscription through organizational or indi- vidual affiliation with TRB. -
Electronic Purchasing Strategies Wi-Fi on Offshore Platforms Statoil's
novdec07.qxp 19/10/2007 16:02 Page 1 Statoil's Integrated Operations Virtual reality for training Halliburton's Digital Asset November - December 2007 Issue 9 Electronic purchasing strategies Wi-fi on offshore platforms Media supporter Associate Member ™ novdec07.qxp 19/10/2007 16:03 Page 2 WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET Vision for Energy > Strategic consulting > Seismic imaging > Velocity analysis > Structural interpretation > Stratigraphic delineation > Formation evaluation > Reservoir modeling > Pore pressure prediction > Well planning Vision is Certainty Leading science, breakthrough innovation and exceptional people. Providing customers with the intelligence to minimise risk and optimise subsurface asset management. Paradigm. Unconfl icted, unsurpassed. www.pdgm.com Digital_Energy_Journal_1007.indd 1 9/12/07 8:53:59 AM novdec07.qxp 19/10/2007 16:03 Page 1 Contents Integrated operations at Kristin Statoil made use of organisational experts when working out the best way to bring workers from its Kristen asset onshore, but working closely with platform personnel. It reduced the number of people required to be on the rig, and also gained improvements in safety, uptime and production 2 Exploration and drilling Halliburton and enabling the Digital Double North Sea oil with rock physics? Asset Martyn Millwood Hargrave, managing direc- November/December 2007 Issue 9 Halliburton new range of services under tor of Ikon Science, believes that rock Digital Energy Journal the label ‘Digital Asset,’ highlighting how it physics based technologies could help find offers the people processes and technology and access a further 4 billion barrels of oil in 213 Marsh Wall, London, E14 9FJ, UK www.digitalenergyjournal.com to help customers make best use of the the North Sea. -
Controversies Regarding Costs, Uncertainties and Benefits Specific to Shale Gas Development
Sustainability 2015, 7, 2473-2489; doi:10.3390/su7032473 OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Article Controversies Regarding Costs, Uncertainties and Benefits Specific to Shale Gas Development Jianu Daniel Muresan 1,†,* and Mihail Vincentiu Ivan 2,† 1 Faculty of Economic Sciences, Department of Business Administration, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, Bd. Bucuresti, nr. 39, Ploiesti 100680, Romania 2 Faculty of Economic Sciences, Department of Cybernetics, Economic Informatics, Finance and Accountancy, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, Bd. Bucuresti, nr. 39, Ploiesti 100680, Romania; E-Mail: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +40-730-116-776. Academic Editor: Istudor Nicolae Received: 24 November 2014 / Accepted: 19 January 2015 / Published: 2 March 2015 Abstract: The shale gas exploration and development is now a delicate and controversial subject. It is often assumed that unconventional exploration and extraction automatically brings prosperity for local, national and regional economies. In this paper, we argue that shale gas development requires a contextualized understanding of regional issues. We are also trying to identify the opportunities and the risks of shale gas development in Eastern Europe (referring to Romania’s case) and offer a cost-benefit analysis model that may be of interest to any policymakers and investors. Keywords: shale gas; cost-benefit analysis; environmental impact; hydraulic fracturing technology; Romania 1. Introduction The true magnitude of environmental risks due to the use of unconventional technologies in shale gas exploitation continues to be the topic of discussions that take place in both scientific environments and civil society. -
WITSML™ and Intelligent Oilfield Operations David Archer
WITSML™ and Intelligent Oilfield Operations David Archer MIT Data Center M-Alliance: Applications in the Petroleum Industry 21 September 2005 Copyright © 2005 POSC WITSML is a trademark of POSC Source: Downes & Mui, “Unleashing the Killer App” Copyright © 2005 POSC Oil fields of the future: real-time oil and gas operations Onshore Facilities Offshore Facilities Decision new capabilities – much more Centers data; much more exposure Smart Systems The basic approach of all “smart technology” is measure-model-control – measure system properties – model actual vs desired behaviour – derive required correction parameters (adaptive control) – implement control Acquire ∆ Control IntOPS Model Analyze IntOPS = Integrated Operations Copyright © 2005 POSC Source: Shell Acquire Time Scales (106 range) Control IntOPS Model Slower Business Headquarters cycle Analyze Capacity Planning Design - Asset life cycle and installed based maintenance or growth [months/years] - Supply Chain Management & Market and customer demands -Planning of injection/production plan and resources Operational Planning Planning drilling and workover resources Time-scale - [months/years] - Supply Chain Management & Market and customer demands Scheduling Opening - S cheduli andng of cl osiinjecting on/prodwells oructi partialon plan completions and resources -Adjusting well operating parameters [days/months] - Supervisory Control -SCADA systems for coordinating flow stations and pipelines Automation level [minutes/hours] -Gas distribution/optimization on a pipeline network -Monitoring wellheads, multiples and flow stations Regulatory Control -Flow, pressure and temperature in wells and separator [sec/minutes] -Fuel injection to produce heat out of a boiler Fast Well & Surface facilities cycle Copyright © 2005 POSC Source: Saputelli SPE 83978 The Problem? • Theorem 1: 50% of the problems in the world result from people using the same words with different meanings • Theorem 2: The other 50% of the problems results from people using different words with the same meaning Stan Kaplan, Risk Analysis, Vol.