DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 3: Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Chapter 3 Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources in the Phosphoria Total Petroleum System of the Wind River Basin Province, Wyoming Volume Title Page By M.A. Kirschbaum, P.G. Lillis, and L.N.R. Roberts Chapter 3 of Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas in the Wind River Basin Province, Wyoming Compiled by USGS Wind River Basin Province Assessment Team U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–J U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1–888–ASK–USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone:1–888–ASK–USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Kirschbaum, M.A., Lillis, P.G., and Roberts, L.N.R., 2007, Geologic assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources in the Phos- phoria Total Petroleum System of the Wind River Basin Province, Wyoming, in USGS Wind River Basin Province assessment team, Petroleum systems and geologic assessment of oil and gas in the Wind River Basin Province, Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–J, ch. 3, 27 p. ISBN 1-4113-2027-7 iii Contents Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Structural Geology …………………………………………………………………………… 3 Phosphoria Total Petroleum System ………………………………………………………… 5 Source Rocks …………………………………………………………………………… 6 Oil Characterization and Distribution …………………………………………………… 6 Maturation and Migration ………………………………………………………………… 7 Stratigraphic units and reservoir rocks …………………………………………………… 8 Madison Limestone (Mississippian) ………………………………………………… 8 Amsden Formation (Mississippian and Pennsylvanian) ……………………………… 10 Tensleep Sandstone (Pennsylvanian) ………………………………………………… 10 Phosphoria, Park City, and Goose Egg Formations (Permian) ………………………… 10 Dinwoody Formation (Triassic) ……………………………………………………… 11 Chugwater Group (Triassic) …………………………………………………………… 11 Nugget Sandstone (Jurassic) ………………………………………………………… 11 Gypsum Spring Formation (Jurassic) ………………………………………………… 11 Sundance Formation (Jurassic) ……………………………………………………… 11 Traps ……………………………………………………………………………………… 15 Seals ……………………………………………………………………………………… 17 Resource Assessment ………………………………………………………………………… 17 Assessment Unit 50350101 Tensleep-Park City Conventional Oil and Gas AU …………… 17 Assessment Results ……………………………………………………………………… 18 Acknowledgments …………………………………………………………………………… 21 References …………………………………………………………………………………… 21 Appendix A. Input data for the Tensleep-Park City Conventional Oil and Gas Assessment Unit 25 Figures 1. Index map of the Wind River Basin Province, Wyoming …………………………………… 2 2. Histogram of number of new field wildcat wells …………………………………………… 2 3. Generalized tectonic map of the Wind River Basin Province ……………………………… 3 4. Structure contour map, top of the Park City Formation …………………………………… 4 5. Petroleum system events chart Phosphoria Total Petroleum System ……………………… 5 6. Columnar section of units in the Phosphoria Total Petroleum System ……………………… 5 7. Organic carbon and black shale facies in the Phosphoria Formation ……………………… 6 8. Geochemistry of oil ………………………………………………………………………… 7 9. Fence diagram from northern Utah to the Wind River Basin ……………………………… 8 iv 10. Timing of oil cracking to gas ……………………………………………………………… 9 11. Stratigraphic cross section western part of the Wind River Basin ……………………12, 13 12. Photographs of main reservoir units in the Wind River Basin Province …………………… 15 13. Lithofacies and paleogeography of the Meade Peak Member …………………………… 16 14. Depth to the top of the Park City Formation ……………………………………………… 18 15. Plots of grown oil accumulations (fields) ………………………………………………… 19 16. Depositional environment of hypothesized reservoirs …………………………………… 20 Table 1. Summary of assessment results for the Phosphoria Total Petroleum System …………… 20 Plate 1. Stratigraphic cross section showing TPS units in Wind River Basin and Bighorn Basin ……… 27 Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources in the Phosphoria Total Petroleum System of the Wind River Basin Province, Wyoming By M.A. Kirschbaum, P.G. Lillis, and L.N.R. Roberts Abstract The Phosphoria Total Petroleum System (TPS) Conventional Oil and Gas AU total 18 million barrels of oil, encompasses the entire Wind River Basin Province, an area of 294 billion cubic feet of gas, and 5.9 million barrels of natural 4.7 million acres in central Wyoming. The source rocks most gas liquids. likely are black, organic-rich shales of the Meade Peak and Retort Phosphatic Shale Members of the Permian Phosphoria Formation located in the Wyoming and Idaho thrust belt to the west and southwest of the province. Petroleum was Introduction generated and expelled during Jurassic and Cretaceous time in westernmost Wyoming and is interpreted to have migrated The purpose of this study is to assess the potential for into the province through carrier beds of the Pennsylvanian undiscovered oil and gas resources from the Phosphoria Total Tensleep Sandstone where it was preserved in hypothesized Petroleum System (TPS) in the Wind River Basin Province, regional stratigraphic traps in the Tensleep and Permian Wyoming (fig. 1). The TPS approach to resource assessment Park City Formation. Secondary migration occurred during used here is based on defining an area of mature source rock the development of structural traps associated with the and all known and undiscovered reservoirs, and requires an Laramide orogeny. The main reservoirs are in the Tensleep understanding of petroleum generation, trap formation, and Sandstone and Park City Formation and minor reservoirs reservoir seal capacity, which are the primary factors needed are in the Mississippian Madison Limestone, Mississippian- for oil and gas accumulation to exist (Magoon and Dow, 1994). Pennsylvanian Amsden Formation, Triassic Chugwater Group, The petroleum system approach used in this assessment is and Jurassic Nugget Sandstone and Sundance Formation. different from that used in the 1995 assessment in the basin by The traps are sealed by shale or evaporite beds of the Park Fox and Dolton (1996), although the methodology is similar. City, Amsden, and Triassic Dinwoody Formations, Triassic The Tensleep-Park City Assessment Unit (AU) defined here Chugwater Group, and Jurassic Gypsum Spring Formation. corresponds to the Phosphoria Formation-sourced part of the A single conventional oil and gas assessment unit (AU), Basin Margin Subthrust, Basin Margin Anticline, and Deep the Tensleep-Park City AU, was defined for the Phosphoria Basin Structure plays (3501-3503) and to six hypothetical TPS. Both the AU and TPS cover the entire Wind River stratigraphic-trap plays (3506-3513) as defined in the 1995 Basin Province. Oil is produced from 18 anticlinal fields, the assessment (Fox and Dolton, 1996). There have been about last of which was discovered in 1957, and the possibility of 425 new-field wildcats drilled since the last oil discovery in discovering new structural oil accumulations is considered to 1957 and about 275 new-field wildcats drilled since the last gas be relatively low. Nonassociated gas is produced from only discovery in 1965 (fig. 2). No new fields have been discovered, two fields, but may be underexplored in the province. The in the years since the 1995 assessment by Fox and Dolton discovery of new gas is more promising, but will be from (1996). The assessment unit has been evaluated using concepts deep structures. The bulk of new oil and gas accumulations is developed during this and previous assessments in light of any dependent on the discovery of hypothesized stratigraphic traps new advances in the geology of the area and by using analogs in isolated carbonate reservoirs of the Park City Formation. from the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, and the Paradox Basin, Mean resource estimates for the Tensleep-Park City Colorado, to provide insights into possible undiscovered fields. 2 Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the Wind River Basin Province, Wyoming 110° W 109° W 108° W 107° W 44° N Park Phosphoria TPS Gas well 20 Phosphoria TPS Oil well Producer from stratigraphically Hot Springs Washakie higher JohnsonTPS Abandoned,Kaycee injection, or other well Teton Dry hole l River Thermopolis Dubois Powder 26 Wind Wind River n 287 Indian Reservation e Riv 25 e e Boysen r r G Reservoir River Ocean Lake Bull Lake Natrona Fremont Sublette Riverton 26 20 43° N Casper Pinedale Lander 189 Platte 351 North MT Jeffrey City 0 15 30 Miles River ID WY 287 Sweetwater Pathfinder WYOMING Reservoir Carbon Figure 1. Index map of the Wind River Basin Province, central Wyoming, showing boundaries of Phosphoria Total Petroleum System (TPS) and Tensleep-Park City Assessment Unit (AU), (which are coincident, all within red line); Wind River Indian Reserva- tion (gray shaded area); locations of oil and gas wells producing from the Tensleep-Park City Assessment Unit within the Phosphoria TPS and of wells that penetrate all or part of
Recommended publications
  • Morrison Formation 37 Cretaceous System 48 Cloverly Formation 48 Sykes Mountain Formation 51 Thermopolis Shale 55 Mowry Shale 56

    Morrison Formation 37 Cretaceous System 48 Cloverly Formation 48 Sykes Mountain Formation 51 Thermopolis Shale 55 Mowry Shale 56

    THE STRUCTURAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE WARM SPRINGS RANCH AREA, HOT SPRINGS COUNTY, WYOMING By CHRISTOPHER JAY CARSON Bachelor of Science Oklahoma State University 1998 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 2000 THE STRUCTURAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE WARM SPRINGS RANCH AREA, HOT SPRINGS COUNTY, WYOMING Thesis Approved: Thesis Advisor ~~L. ... ~. ----'-"'-....D~e~e:.-g-e----- II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express appreciation to my advisor Dr. Arthur Cleaves for providing me with the opportunity to compile this thesis, and his help carrying out the fieldwork portion of the thesis. My sincere appreciation is extended to my advisory committee members: Dr. Stan Paxton, Dr. Gary Stewart, and Mr. David Schmude. I wish to thank Mr. Schmude especially for the great deal of personal effort he put forth toward the completion of this thesis. His efforts included financial, and time contributions, along with invaluable injections of enthusiasm, advice, and friendship. I extend my most sincere thank you to Dr. Burkhard Pohl, The Big Hom Basin Foundation, and the Wyoming Dinosaur Center. Without whose input and financial support this thesis would not have been possible. In conjunction I would like to thank the staff of the Wyoming Dinosaur Center for the great deal of help that I received during my stay in Thermopolis. Finally I wish to thank my friends and family. To my friends who have pursued this process before me, and with me; thank you very much.
  • Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology PRELIMINARY

    Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology PRELIMINARY

    Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology PRELIMINARY GEOLOGIC MAP OF PARADISE VALLEY SOUTH-CENTRAL MONTANA by David A. Lopez and Jon C. Reiten Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Open File Report MBMG 480 2003 This report has been reviewed for conformity with Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology’s technical and editorial standards. Partial support has been provided by the STATEMAP component of the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program of the U.S. Geological Survey under Contract Number: 02HQAG0038. Montana 15 90 Map area 90 15 111° Bozeman Livingston 90 Map area r e 89 v i 45°30' R e n o t s w o l l e Y Emigrant Park Co. Gallatin Co. Pray Chico Miner Corwin Springs Jardine Gardiner YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK 45° MT 3 0 3 6 Miles WY Location of the Paradise Valley map area. 1 CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS Qal Qdf Qrs Qc Qaf Qta Qls Holocene Qat1 Qpg Qgtc Qgoc Qgt Qat2 Qgt8 Qgo8 ? Qat Qat3 Qtr Qat4 QUATERNARY Pleistocene Qat5 Unconformity Qba Unconformity Thr Unconformity Tba Pliocene Tgr Unconformity Ts Miocene Unconformity TERTIARY Thpa Thpb Thpv Td Tdf Tqla Tgcs Tgca Eocene Tslc Tse Unconformity Tft Paleocene Unconformity Kho Kbc Kmi Kcd Unconformity Kls Unconformity Kevt Upper Cretaceous Ke CRETACEOUS Ktc Kco Kcf Kf Km Kmfr Ktf Unconformity Lower Cretaceous Kk Jm Upper Jurassic JURASSIC Je Middle Jurassic JT s R Unconformity TRc Lower Triassic TRIASSIC Unconformity Permi an PERMIAN lPq PMpa PMqa Pennsylvani an PENNSYLVANIAN lPMa Upper Miss. Unconformity MISSISSIPPIAN Mm Lower Miss. Unconformity DOs Dev.—Ord. DEV. --ORD Unconformity U & Mid.Cambrian CAMBRIAN Cs Unconformity Early Proterozoic Xmy PRECAMBRIAN Unconformity Archean Ag Anc Aqa Asg Aga As 2 DESCRIPTIONS OF MAP UNITS Qal Alluvium of modern channels and flood plains (Holocene) – Younger alluvium generally confined to the present flood plain developed along active rivers and streams.
  • From the Western of the United

    From the Western of the United

    from the Western of the United GEOLOGICAL SURVEY P R® BES&lON AL PAPER 1057 Early Triassic Terebratulid Brachiopods from the Western Interior of the United States By PETER R. HOOVER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1057 Description and illustration offive species of terebratulid brachiopods, and discussion of their distribution and developmental and evolutionary history UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1979 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Hoover, Peter R. Early Triassic Terebratulid Brachiopods from the Western Interior of the United States (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1057) Bibliography: p. 19 Includes index Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19:16:1057 1. Terebratulida, Fossil. 2. Paleontology Triassic. 3. Paleontology The West. I. Title. II. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1057 QE797.T29H66 564'.8 77-608314 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03182-5 CONTENTS Page Page Systematic paleontology Continued Abstract ....................... 1 Family Dielasmatidae Continued Introduction .................... 1 Subfamily Dielasmatinae. Previous work................ 1 Rhaetina Waagen ..... Present study ................ 3 Family Terebratulidae ......... 9 Acknowledgments ............ 3 Subfamily Plectoconchiinae. 9 Fossil localities cited in this report. .... 3 Vex, n. gen. ......... 9 Stratigraphic setting of the brachiopods 4 Family Cryptonellidae ......... 11 Faunal relationships. .............. 6 Subfamily Cryptacanthiinae . 11 Biostratigraphic implications........ 6 Obnixia, n. gen. ...... 11 Systematic paleontology............ 7 Family Zeilleriidae ............ 17 Family Dielasmatidae.......... 7 Periallus, n. gen. ......... 17 Subfamily Zugmayeriinae . 7 References cited. ................. 19 Portneufia, n. gen. .... 7 Index ......................... 21 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates follow index] PLATE 1.
  • This Is a Digital Document from the Collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library

    This Is a Digital Document from the Collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library

    This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library. For additional information about this document and the document conversion process, please contact WRDS at [email protected] and include the phrase “Digital Documents” in your subject heading. To view other documents please visit the WRDS Library online at: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu Mailing Address: Water Resources Data System University of Wyoming, Dept 3943 1000 E University Avenue Laramie, WY 82071 Physical Address: Wyoming Hall, Room 249 University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 82071 Phone: (307) 766-6651 Fax: (307) 766-3785 Funding for WRDS and the creation of this electronic document was provided by the Wyoming Water Development Commission (http://wwdc.state.wy.us) VOLUME 11-A OCCURRENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUND WATER IN THE BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING Robert Libra, Dale Doremus , Craig Goodwin Project Manager Craig Eisen Water Resources Research Institute University of Wyoming Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Contract Number G 008269-791 Project Officer Paul Osborne June, 1981 INTRODUCTION This report is the second of a series of hydrogeologic basin reports that define the occurrence and chemical quality of ground water within Wyoming. Information presented in this report has been obtained from several sources including available U.S. Geological Survey publications, the Wyoming State Engineer's Office, the Wyoming Geological Survey, and the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. The purpose of this report is to provide background information for implementation of the Underground Injection Control Program (UIC). The UIC program, authorized by the Safe Drinking Water Act (P.L.
  • Related Magmatism in the Upper Wind River Basin, Wyoming (USA), GEOSPHERE; V

    Related Magmatism in the Upper Wind River Basin, Wyoming (USA), GEOSPHERE; V

    Research Paper THEMED ISSUE: Cenozoic Tectonics, Magmatism, and Stratigraphy of the Snake River Plain–Yellowstone Region and Adjacent Areas GEOSPHERE The leading wisps of Yellowstone: Post–ca. 5 Ma extension- related magmatism in the upper Wind River Basin, Wyoming (USA), GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 1 associated with the Yellowstone hotspot tectonic parabola doi:10.1130/GES01553.1 Matthew E. Brueseke1, Anna C. Downey1, Zachary C. Dodd1, William K. Hart2, Dave C. Adams3, and Jeff A. Benowitz4 12 figures; 2 tables; 1 supplemental file 1Department of Geology, Kansas State University, 108 Thompson Hall, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA 2Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Science, Miami University, 118C Shideler Hall, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA 3Box 155, Teton Village, Wyoming 83025, USA CORRESPONDENCE: brueseke@ ksu .edu 4Geophysical Institute and Geochronology Laboratory, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA CITATION: Brueseke, M.E., Downey, A.C., Dodd, Z.C., Hart, W.K., Adams, D.C., and Benowitz, J.A., 2018, The leading wisps of Yellowstone: Post–ca. 5 Ma ABSTRACT the issue of linking volcanic events to a specific driving mechanism (Fouch, extension-related magmatism in the upper Wind River 2012; Kuehn et al., 2015). Complicating matters, magmatism often continues Basin, Wyoming (USA), associated with the Yellow- The upper Wind River Basin in northwest Wyoming (USA) is located ~80– long after (e.g., millions of years) the upper plate has been translated away stone hotspot tectonic parabola: Geosphere, v. 14, no. 1, p. 74–94, doi:10.1130/GES01553.1. 100 km southeast of the Yellowstone Plateau volcanic field. While the upper from an upwelling plume (Bercovici and Mahoney, 1994; Sleep, 2003; Shervais Wind River Basin is a manifestation of primarily Cretaceous to Eocene Lara- and Hanan, 2008; Jean et al., 2014).
  • Surface Geology Wind/Bighorn River Basin Wyoming and Montana

    Surface Geology Wind/Bighorn River Basin Wyoming and Montana

    WYOMING STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Plate I Thomas A. Drean, State Geologist Wind/Bighorn Basin Plan II - Available Groundwater Determination Technical Memorandum Surface Geology - Wind/Bighorn River Basin SWEET GRASS R25E R5E R15E R30E R10E R20E MONTANA Mm PM Jsg T7S KJ !c Pp Jsg KJ water Qt Surface Geology Ti ! Red Lodge PM DO PM PM Ts Ts p^r PM N ^r DO KJ DO !c Wind/Bighorn River Basin Tts Mm water Mm Ti Ti ^r DO Kmt Ti LOCATION MAP p^r ^r ^r Qt WYOMING Wyoming and Montana Kf Qt Ti p^r !c p^r PM 0 100 250 Miles Tts ^r PM DO Ti Jsg MD Ts Ti MzPz Kmv !Pg Qt compiled DO DO Tts Ts Taw DO DO DO water Qt Kc PM ^r Twl Qt Ob O^ by ^r Mm DO !c MD MONTANA Thr Ti Kc Qr Klc p^r Kmv Kc : # Ts ^r : O^ Nikolaus Gribb, Brett Worman, # Ts # water : PM Taw # Kf : PM !cd : Ket Qb Taw Qu Twp Thr # Ki Twl 345 P$Ma : Thr O^ Qa KJg Tfu : Jsg ^r Qu : :: # Kl (! KJk : Qr Qls Tomas Gracias, and Scott Quillinan Qb : Thr Ts Taw # Tfu 37 PM Kft: : # :: T10S Qls # Thr : # ^r Kc (! Kft Kmt # :::::: p^r :: : Qu KJk Kc MD Taw DO Qu # p^r Qg :: Km KJ WYOMING Taw Ti : Kl 2012 Thr : Qb # # # Qg : water DO Qls ::: !c !Pg !cd MDO water water Kc Qa :::::: :: Kmt ::: : Twl 90 : Ti Ts Qu Qa Qg Kmv !Pcg Mm KJk : Qg : 212 : Qu Qg £¤ Kmv KJ ¨¦§ Tts Taw p^r ^r # Kl : Kf Kf 338 Ob !cd Qu Qu Ttp # (! : : : p^r ::: !Pg O^ MD P$Ma Thr : Qa # DO Km Qls 343 ^r Qls Taw : Qb Qg Qls Qa Km Jsg water (! : Qb # !cd ^r Kc BighornLake : MD # Taw Qa Qls Qt MD A′ MD MD Qg Twl !Pg Qu Qb Tii # Twp ^r water MzPz Qg Tfu Kl ::: Taw Taw Twp Qls : Qt Kmv Qa Ob P$Ma : Thr Qa # Tcr ^r water Qa Kft # Qt O^
  • Phosphate Rock in Wyoming

    Phosphate Rock in Wyoming

    Phosphate Rock in Wyoming Jacob D. Carnes Report of Investigations No. 68 • 2015 WYOMING STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas A. Drean, Director and State Geologist Director and State Geologist Thomas A. Drean Editing by: Sarah R. Garlick Design and layout by: James R. Rodgers Photomicrograph of phosphate rock from the Poison Creek trench in Lincoln County, Wyo., showing the concentric structure of ap- atite grains commonly found in phosphorites of the Phosphoria Formation. Photomicrograph by Jacob Carnes, 2015. Cover photo: Outcrop of the Meade Peak Member of the Phosphoria Formation along U.S. Hwy 26, approximately 3 miles southwest of Hoback Junction, in Teton County, Wyo. Photo by Jacob Carnes, 2015. Phosphate Rock in Wyoming Wyoming State Geological Survey (WSGS) Report of Investigations No. 68, 2015 Suggested citation: Carnes, J.D., 2015, Phosphate rock in Wyoming: Wyoming State Geological Survey Report of Investigations No. 68, 34 p. The WSGS encourages fair use of its material. We request that credit be expressly given to the “Wyoming State Geological Survey” when citing information from this publication. Please contact the WSGS at 307- 766-2286, ext. 224, or by email at [email protected], if you have any questions about citing materials, preparing acknowledgments, or extensive use of this material. We appreciate your cooperation. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement or approval by the State of Wyoming or the WSGS. Individuals with disabilities who require an alternate form of this publication should contact the WSGS. TTY relay operator 800-877-9975.
  • Dinotracks.Indb 358 1/22/16 11:23 AM Dinosaur Tracks in Eolian Strata: New Insights Into Track Formation, Walking Kinetics and Trackmaker Behavior 18

    Dinotracks.Indb 358 1/22/16 11:23 AM Dinosaur Tracks in Eolian Strata: New Insights Into Track Formation, Walking Kinetics and Trackmaker Behavior 18

    358 DinoTracks.indb 358 1/22/16 11:23 AM Dinosaur Tracks in Eolian Strata: New Insights into Track Formation, Walking Kinetics and Trackmaker Behavior 18 David B. Loope and Jesper Milàn Dinosaur tracks are abundant in wind-blown hooves of the bison deformed soft, laminated sediment – the Mesozoic deposits, but the nature of loose eolian sand perfect medium to preserve recognizable tracks. The next makes it difficult to determine how they are preserved. This windstorm buried the tracks. Today, the thick cover of grasses also raises the questions: Why would dinosaurs be walking protects the land surface so well that there are no soft, lami- around in dune fields in the first place? And, if they did go nated sediments for cattle to step on. And, if any tracks were, there, why would their tracks not be erased by the next wind somehow, to get formed, no moving sediment would be avail- storm? able to bury them. Mesozoic eolian sediments around the world, which have been the focus of a number of case studies Introduction in recent years, preserve the tracks of dinosaurs that walked on actively migrating sand dunes. This chapter summarizes Most dunes today form only in deserts and along shore- the known occurrences of dinosaur tracks in Mesozoic eo- lines – the only sandy land surfaces that are nearly devoid of lian strata and discusses their unique modes of preservation plants. Normally plants slow the wind at the ground surface and the anatomical and behavioral information about the enough that sand will not move even when the plant cover trackmakers that can be deduced from them.
  • Eocene Green River Formation, Western United States

    Eocene Green River Formation, Western United States

    Synoptic reconstruction of a major ancient lake system: Eocene Green River Formation, western United States M. Elliot Smith* Alan R. Carroll Brad S. Singer Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, 1215 West Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA ABSTRACT Members. Sediment accumulation patterns than being confi ned to a single episode of arid thus refl ect basin-center–focused accumula- climate. Evaporative terminal sinks were Numerous 40Ar/39Ar experiments on sani- tion rates when the basin was underfi lled, initially located in the Greater Green River dine and biotite from 22 ash beds and 3 and supply-limited accumulation when the and Piceance Creek Basins (51.3–48.9 Ma), volcaniclastic sand beds from the Greater basin was balanced fi lled to overfi lled. Sedi- then gradually migrated southward to the Green River, Piceance Creek, and Uinta ment accumulation in the Uinta Basin, at Uinta Basin (47.1–45.2 Ma). This history is Basins of Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah Indian Canyon, Utah, was relatively con- likely related to progressive southward con- constrain ~8 m.y. of the Eocene Epoch. Mul- stant at ~150 mm/k.y. during deposition of struction of the Absaroka Volcanic Prov- tiple analyses were conducted per sample over 5 m.y. of both evaporative and fl uctuat- ince, which constituted a major topographic using laser fusion and incremental heating ing profundal facies, which likely refl ects the and thermal anomaly that contributed to a techniques to differentiate inheritance, 40Ar basin-margin position of the measured sec- regional north to south hydrologic gradient. loss, and 39Ar recoil.
  • Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field

    Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field

    Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field June 12, 2007 ABSTRACT This is compilation of a technical analysis of existing paleontological data and a limited, selective paleontological field survey of the geologic bedrock formations that will be impacted on Federal lands by construction associated with energy development in the Jonah Field, Sublette County, Wyoming. The field survey was done on approximately 20% of the field, primarily where good bedrock was exposed or where there were existing, debris piles from recent construction. Some potentially rich areas were inaccessible due to biological restrictions. Heavily vegetated areas were not examined. All locality data are compiled in the separate confidential appendix D. Uinta Paleontological Associates Inc. was contracted to do this work through EnCana Oil & Gas Inc. In addition BP and Ultra Resources are partners in this project as they also have holdings in the Jonah Field. For this project, we reviewed a variety of geologic maps for the area (approximately 47 sections); none of maps have a scale better than 1:100,000. The Wyoming 1:500,000 geology map (Love and Christiansen, 1985) reveals two Eocene geologic formations with four members mapped within or near the Jonah Field (Wasatch – Alkali Creek and Main Body; Green River – Laney and Wilkins Peak members). In addition, Winterfeld’s 1997 paleontology report for the proposed Jonah Field II Project was reviewed carefully. After considerable review of the literature and museum data, it became obvious that the portion of the mapped Alkali Creek Member in the Jonah Field is probably misinterpreted.
  • Appendix 1 – Environmental Predictor Data

    Appendix 1 – Environmental Predictor Data

    APPENDIX 1 – ENVIRONMENTAL PREDICTOR DATA CONTENTS Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Climate ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Land Use and Land Cover ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Soils and Substrate .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Topography .............................................................................................................................................................................. 10 References ................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 1 OVERVIEW A set of 94 potential predictor layers compiled to use in distribution modeling for the target taxa. Many of these layers derive from previous modeling work by WYNDD1, 2, but a
  • Moneta Divide Map 6 Geologic

    Moneta Divide Map 6 Geologic

    Geologic Units Mesozoic - Paleozoic Cenozoic/Quaternary MzPz: Mesozoic and II Qa: Alluvium and D Paleozoic rocks Colluvium L___J Paleozoic/Permian Qt: Gravel, Pediment, II Pp: Phosphoria and Sand Deposits Formation and related - L___J rocks II Qs: Dune Sand and L___J Loess Paleozoic/Carboniferous Cenozoic/Tertiary PM : Tensleep Sandstone D and Amsden Formation Tim: Indian Meadows Formation P*M: Casper Formation and Madison Limestone -D Tm: Miocene rocks (N ,S) MD: Madison Tml: Lower Miocene Limestone rocks Mm : Madison Twr: White River - Limestone or Group Formation D -D (N) , or Madison ·- .... ---..:::-.::--------.... Limestone (S) ......... -- Twb : Wagon Bed --. - Formation --- --- Paleozoic/Cambrian Twdr: Wind River _r: Gallatin Limestone, Formation Gros Ventre Formation D and equivalents, and Tfu : Fort Union Formation Flathead Sandstone (N), or Cambrian rocks (S) Cenozoic - Mesozoic Pzr: Madison Limestone, Darby Formation , Bighorn TKu : Sedimentary Dolomite, Gallatin Rocks - Limestone, Gros Ventre Formation and Flathead Mesozoic/Cretaceous .. O_: Bighorn Dolomite, Kim: Lance Formation, D Gallatin Limestone, and D Fox Hills Sandstone, Gros Ventre Formation (TB) Meeteetse Formation Archaen Kml: Meeteetse .. Ugn: Oldest Twdr Formation and Lewis D Gneiss complex Shale Kmv: Mesaverde WVsv: Formation Metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks Kc: Cody Shale - Wg : Granitic Rocks N ------ Fault Line ~ Mesozoic/Jurassic w KJ :Cloverly and Morrison Cl Project Features D Formations (N , S) . Jsg: Sundance and Production Area . Gypsum Spring D Formations Disposal Areas Mesozoic/Triassic D "cd: Chugwater and Treated Water Discharge D Dinwoody Formations ~ Pipeline Corridors Source: Geologic Units, USGS 1994 Product Pipeline (Upda ted 2013); USGS 2005 Corridor Disposal Area Water Pipeline Corridor Map6 Geologic Map Moneta Divide Natural Gas and Oil Development Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement April 2019 No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management for use ofthe data for purposes not intended by the BLM .