The Early Gentrifier: Weaving a Nostalgia Narrative on the Lower East Side

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Early Gentrifier: Weaving a Nostalgia Narrative on the Lower East Side The Early Gentrifier: Weaving a Nostalgia Narrative on the Lower East Side Richard E. Ocejo∗ Department of Sociology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York (CUNY) Focusing on the consequences of social and cultural displacement from commercial gentrification, this article examines the perspective of “early gentrifiers” decades af- ter they moved into the neighborhood. Based on ethnographic data collected on the Lower East Side—a gentrified neighborhood with new bars—this article ana- lyzes how new nightlife triggered early gentrifiers to weave a “nostalgia narrative” from their experiences. They use this narrative to construct a new local identity as the neighborhood’s symbolic “owners,” which helps them in their collective ac- tion against bars. Their narrative, however, contains internal contradictions that reveal several issues with their new identity. I argue that a cultural analysis of early gentrifiers reveals significant social configurations in gentrified neighborhoods and informs us of the relationship between ideology and action. I am aware that it is childish, but sometimes, leaning against the spick-and-span new bar, I am overcome by nostalgia for the gutter... - Joseph Mitchell1 COMMERCIAL GENTRIFICATION AND THE EARLY GENTRIFIER An understudied facet of gentrification is the cultural impacts of its commercial devel- opments. Commercial gentrification refers to new establishments with particular goods and services—such as clothing boutiques, art galleries, cafes, restaurants, and bars—that open to satisfy the needs of middle-class gentrifiers (Deener 2007; Levy and Cybriwsky 1980; Lloyd 2006; Patch 2008; Zukin et al. 2009). It has a mutually reinforcing rela- tionship with residential gentrification in that these businesses also attract new residents (Chernoff 1980). As with residential gentrification, new businesses raise property values and rents and threaten to displace existing establishments (see Atkinson 2000; Marcuse 1986; Smith 1996; Smith and Williams 1986). But commercial gentrification also causes social and cultural displacement for existing residents as new businesses attract new uses and users to the neighborhood. Social displacement refers to “the replacement of one group by another...in terms of prestige and power...the ability to affect decisions and ∗ Correspondence should be addressed to Richard E. Ocejo, Department of Sociology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York (CUNY), 899 Tenth Avenue, Room 520.12, New York, NY 10019; [email protected] City & Community 10:3 September 2011 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2011.01372.x C 2011 American Sociological Association, 1430 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20005 285 CITY AND COMMUNITY policies...to set goals and priorities, and to be recognized by outsiders as the legitimate spokesman for the area” (Chernoff 1980: 204; see also Martin 2007). Cultural displace- ment refers to the replacement of a group’s everyday way of life in the neighborhood with that of another (Jackson 2003; Levy and Cybriwsky 1980; Pattillo 2007). Both forms of displacement threaten the local identities of existing residents. Many gentrification studies focus on existing, working-class, low-income residents and their perspectives toward new residents and businesses (Jackson 2003; Levy and Cybriwsky 1980; Pattillo 2007; Perez 2004; Smith 1996). Others have looked at a broad ar- ray of gentrifiers (i.e., artists, social preservationists, gays and lesbians, Whites and Blacks, and owners of boutiques and cafes) and focused on their reasons for moving into and opening up businesses in the neighborhood as well as their perspectives toward and re- lationships with existing residents (Brown-Saracino 2009; Butler 1997; Caulfield 1994; Deener 2007; Lloyd 2006; Patch 2008; Pattillo 2007; Rose 1984; Sibalis 2004). Rather than a single event, gentrification is a gradual process, often with identifiable “stages” or “waves” (Clay 1979; Lees 2000; see also Hackworth and Smith 2001). The neigh- borhood’s conditions at the time of their arrival, as well as their own social position within the neighborhood, help to shape gentrifiers’ perspectives toward its gentrification (Brown-Saracino 2010: 170–1). In her discussion of the “marginal gentrifier” concept— an early account of the variety of gentrifier types—Rose (1984) states that scholars must continue to characterize people in gentrifying neighborhoods by their motives and in- terests (also see Caulfield 1994). Despite the increasing amount of literature on gentri- fiers, underexplored is their perspective toward the gentrified neighborhood, their atti- tudes toward its people, their understanding of their own role in its gentrification, and the bases of their local identities, decades after they moved there. How do early gen- trifiers construct new local identities? What sorts of ideological tools do they use while under the threat of social and cultural displacement, and in what ways do they use these tools? Based on ethnographic data collected on the gentrified Lower East Side of Manhattan, this article reveals how “early gentrifiers” use a “nostalgia narrative” to con- struct a new local identity as the neighborhood’s symbolic “owners” (Deener 2007). They then use this narrative and identity in their organized protests against bars and nightlife. A nostalgia narrative is an example of “collective memory” (Halbwachs 1992; also see Anderson 1991; Hobsbawm and Ranger 1983) or a social construction of the past that is specifically triggered by a sense of loss. The Lower East Side’s early gentrifiers see new bars and nightlife as threats to the sociocultural environments that they remember, the people and places that they were strongly attached to, the public spaces they inhabited, and their future, or “interactional potential” (Milligan 1998), in the neighborhood. Their nostalgia narrative consists of their personal experiences with the neighborhood’s gritty past, ethnic and cultural diversity, and creativity and creative production, all of which they identify as “authentic.” This community ideology contrasts with their understanding of new residents and visiting nightlife revelers, whom they identify as homogenous (and homogenizing), transient and uncreative consumers, and “inauthentic.” On the basis of this narrative, early gentrifiers construct their new local identity and protest bars, despite both having internal contradictions. I argue that a cultural analysis of early gentrifiers reveals not only how local identities are shaped, but also how social power is configured in gentrified neighborhoods. 286 THE EARLY GENTRIFIER: WEAVING A NOSTALGIA NARRATIVE ON THE LOWER EAST SIDE NOSTALGIA AND GENTRIFIERS An important aspect of people’s reactions to displacement, or more generally to discon- tinuities in their attachment to place (Milligan 1998), is their use of nostalgia. Nostalgia represents a very powerful feeling toward change, and specifically toward loss (Turner 1987). But while people often quickly dismiss nostalgia as overly romantic and a pass- ing emotion, it is in fact strongly connected with one’s identity and sense of community (Davis 1979). A nostalgia narrative is an imagined story of the past that deliberately selects certain elements from personal history while excluding others to construct a version that is more favorable than the reality. People weave a nostalgia narrative when they sense that their attachments to a place and their future in a place are under threat. Despite its internal contradictions, people use a nostalgia narrative to create new identities that establish them as significant actors in the place’s past and present (Milligan 2003). Neighborhoods are important places in cities, where people weave a tale based on nostalgia. In their research on Red Hook, Kasinitz and Hillyard (1995) show how “old- timers,” or longtime working-class residents, tell a “tale” of their waterfront neighbor- hood’s past that highlights a sense of solidarity and economic self-sufficiency, as it is going through a present period of decline. Red Hook’s diminished economic vitality led to an influx of poor Puerto Rican and African-American residents into the neighbor- hood’s substantial stock of public housing. This transformation forced coexistence be- tween new minorities and the largely racially intolerant White working-class old-timers, who understood the former’s influx as a threat to their stake in the neighborhood’s so- ciocultural environment and their ability to control its image. But while Red Hook’s old- timers express dissatisfaction with the neighborhood’s present, they ignore and down- play key aspects of its past. For instance, old-timers often condemn the illegal activity that takes place in the housing projects, but omit the violence, drugs, and organized crime that plagued the neighborhood of their youth. They use this constructed tale of nostalgia to counter the present and assert the value of what outsiders saw as a slum. Gentrification scholars also identify the use of nostalgia among social actors. In her study of the gentrifying Black Chicago neighborhood of North Kenwood-Oakland, Pattillo’s (2007) participants fondly recall a time of community, shopping, and entertain- ment before gentrification. Even though they were surrounded by gangs, poverty, and violence in the 1970s and 1980s, they saw their own community as an “island” amid chaos (72–3). As new middle-class residents arrived and threatened to residentially, socially, and culturally displace them, existing
Recommended publications
  • Calculation of Owner-Occupied Dwelling Services In
    Calculation of Owner-Occupied Dwelling Services in Georgia Abstract Output of owner-occupied dwellings (OOD) is included within the production boundary according to the System of National Accounts. Different methods may be selected for measuring OOD services due to housing market development level. The paper presents estimation of services produced by OODs based on a User Cost Method, which replaced a self-assessment method in 2019 year in the National Accounts of Georgia during the general revision of time series. Key words: Owner-Occupied Dwellings, Imputed rent, User Cost Method Author: Levan Karsaulidze – Head of National Accounts Department, National Statistics Office of Georgia Introduction Imputed rents, representing services produced by owner-occupied dwellings (OOD), has always been included within the production boundary of National Account and are part of the official GDP estimates of Georgia as well. In 2019 transition to the SNA 2008 was implemented1 in the National Accounts of Georgia from the SNA 1993, accompanied with a general revision of time series. Along with other major changes related to the newly adopted methodology, user-cost method was implemented for measuring imputed rents for owner occupied houses, while self-assessment method was used until 2019 year. The paper describes a methodological background and detailed calculation steps for measuring imputed rents of OODs in Georgia, based on the user-cost method, briefly summarizes widely used approaches for estimating services of OODs and provides arguments for adopting the use-cost method for the country. Final results are presented in the last part of the paper. 1. Methodological Framework Methodology for measuring imputed rents of owner-occupied dwellings differs by country based on a rental market development level.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Area Plan
    CHAPTER 6 RESIDENTIAL AREA PLAN Brentwood’s residential neighborhoods are one of the most The Objectives identified in the Residential Area Plan are significant contributors to its unique character and identity . intended to: Throughout the planning process residents expressed their vision and concerns for the City’s residential areas . The Res- • Maintain Brentwood’s character and identity idential Area Plan builds on public input and the future Land • Ensure quality housing stock remains a staple of the Use & Development Plan to provide policies and recommen- community dations as well as further define the type and location of each • Maintain the optimal balance of housing types within the residential land use . The location of each residential land use community is illustrated in the Residential Area Plan . • Ensure compatibility between the City’s commercial areas and its residential neighborhoods • Ensure compatibility between infill and existing residential development • Encourage a diversity of housing types, sizes and prices 60 Comprehensive Plan | Brentwood RESIDENTIAL LAND USE PLAN 170 RICHMOND HEIGHTS 64 40 EAGER RD 64 40 LADUE BRENTWOOD Wrenwood Ln FOREST Middlesex Dr Middlesex CONDOMINIUMS THE VILLAS AT BRENTWOOD STRASSNER DR HANLEY STATION Pine Ave MCKNIGHT RD MCKNIGHT Sonora Ave HIGH SCHOOL DR SCHOOL HIGH MEMORIAL PARK BRENTWOOD MAPLEWOOD Saint Clair Ave Clair Saint Park Ridge Ave Ridge Park BRENTWOOD POLICE MIDDLE & Bridgeport Ave DEPARTMENT HIGH Hanley Industrial Ct MT. CALVARY White Ave LUTHERAN PRESCHOOL Rosalie Ave MCGRATH Harrison Ave CITY ELEMENTARY HALL BROUGHTON PARK LITZSINGER RD Eulalie Ave BRENTWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT MARK TWAIN ELEMENTARY HANLEYRD Annalee Ave Dorothy Ave Kentland Dr Joseph Ave OAK Bremerton Rd ROGERS TREE ROCK HILL Madge Ave BRENTWOODBLVD PARKWAY PARK Powell Ave ST.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Analysis of Constraints to Housing
    CITY OF OAKLAND HOUSING ELEMENT 2015- 2023 6. ANALYSIS OF CONSTRAINTS TO HOUSING A. GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS Governmental policies and regulations can have both positive and negative effects on the availability and affordability of housing and supportive services. This chapter of the Housing Element describes the policies and strategies that provide incentives for housing in Oakland that have resulted in significant contributions to the City’s housing stock. This chapter also analyzes City policies and regulations that could potentially constrain the City’s abilities to achieve its housing objectives. Constraints to housing can include land use controls, development standards, infrastructure requirements, residential development fees, and development approval processes, along with non-governmental constraints such as financing. A brief discussion of the City’s policy and regulatory context is presented below. Since 1998, the City of Oakland has undertaken actions to reduce the impact of local government regulations and fees on the cost and availability of housing. Beginning with the General Plan update in 1998, the City has: • increased residential densities, • created new mixed-use housing opportunities along major transportation corridors and in the downtown, • reduced open space requirements in high density residential zones in the Downtown and in the Transit Oriented Development Zone (S-15), • streamlined the environmental review process for downtown projects, • adopted a Density Bonus Ordinance, • adopted a secondary unit ordinance and streamlined the process for approval, • created new fast-track and streamlined permit processes, and • adopted Standard Conditions of Approval to, in part, streamline the CEQA review process. Land Use Policies and Regulations Discretionary land use control in Oakland is exercised by the Planning Commission and the City Council, and administered by the Planning and Building Department, Bureau of Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • God in Chinatown
    RELIGION, RACE, AND ETHNICITY God in Chinatown General Editor: Peter J. Paris Religion and Survival in New York's Public Religion and Urban Transformation: Faith in the City Evolving Immigrant Community Edited by Lowell W. Livezey Down by the Riverside: Readings in African American Religion Edited by Larry G. Murphy New York Glory: Kenneth ]. Guest Religions in the City Edited by Tony Carnes and Anna Karpathakis Religion and the Creation of Race and Ethnicity: An Introduction Edited by Craig R. Prentiss God in Chinatown: Religion and Survival in New York's Evolving Immigrant Community Kenneth J. Guest 111 New York University Press NEW YORK AND LONDON NEW YORK UNIVERSITY PRESS For Thomas Luke New York and London www.nyupress.org © 2003 by New York University All rights reserved All photographs in the book, including the cover photos, have been taken by the author. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Guest, Kenneth J. God in Chinatown : religion and survival in New York's evolving immigrant community I Kenneth J. Guest. p. em.- (Religion, race, and ethnicity) Includes bibliographical references (p. 209) and index. ISBN 0-8147-3153-8 (cloth) - ISBN 0-8147-3154-6 (paper) 1. Immigrants-Religious life-New York (State)-New York. 2. Chinese Americans-New York (State )-New York-Religious life. 3. Chinatown (New York, N.Y.) I. Title. II. Series. BL2527.N7G84 2003 200'.89'95107471-dc21 2003000761 New York University Press books are printed on acid-free paper, and their binding materials are chosen for strength and durability. Manufactured in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Chinatown and the Fuzhounese 37 36 Chinatown and the Fuzhounese have been quite successful, it also includes many individuals who are ex­ tremely desperate financially and emotionally.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decline of New York City Nightlife Culture Since the Late 1980S
    1 Clubbed to Death: The Decline of New York City Nightlife Culture Since the Late 1980s Senior Thesis by Whitney Wei Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of BA Economic and Social History Barnard College of Columbia University New York, New York 2015 2 ii. Contents iii. Acknowledgement iv. Abstract v. List of Tables vi. List of Figures I. Introduction……………………………………………………………………7 II. The Limelight…………………………………………………………………12 III. After Dark…………………………………………………………………….21 a. AIDS Epidemic Strikes Clubland……………………..13 b. Gentrification: Early and Late………………………….27 c. The Impact of Gentrification to Industry Livelihood…32 IV. Clubbed to Death …………………………………………………………….35 a. 1989 Zoning Changes to Entertainment Venues…………………………36 b. Scandal, Vilification, and Disorder……………………………………….45 c. Rudy Giuliani and Criminalization of Nightlife………………………….53 V. Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………60 VI. Bibliography………………………………………………………………..…61 3 Acknowledgement I would like to take this opportunity to thank Professor Alan Dye for his wise guidance during this thesis process. Having such a supportive advisor has proven indispensable to the quality of this work. A special thank you to Ian Sinclair of NYC Planning for providing key zoning documents and patient explanations. Finally, I would like to thank the support and contributions of my peers in the Economic and Social History Senior Thesis class. 4 Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the impact of city policy changes and the processes of gentrification on 1980s nightlife subculture in New York City. What are important to this work are the contributions and influence of nightlife subculture to greater New York City history through fashion, music, and art. I intend to prove that, in combination with the city’s gradual revanchism of neighborhood properties, the self-destructive nature of this after-hours sector has led to its own demise.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York City Waterfalls
    THE NEW YORK CITY WATERFALLS GUIDE FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS WELCOME PLAnnING YOUR TRIP The New York City Waterfalls are sited in four locations, and can be viewed from many places. They provide different experiences at each site, and the artist hopes you will visit all of the Waterfalls and see the various parts of New York City they have temporarily become part of. You can get closest to the Welcome to THE NEW YORK CIty WATERFALLS! Waterfalls at Empire-Fulton Ferry State Park in DUMBO; along the Manhattan Waterfront Greenway, north of the Manhattan Bridge; along the Brooklyn The New York City Waterfalls is a work of public art comprised of four Heights Promenade; at Governors Island; and by boat in the New York Harbor. man-made waterfalls in the New York Harbor. Presented by Public Art Fund in collaboration with the City of New York, they are situated along A great place to go with a large group is Empire-Fulton Ferry State Park in Brooklyn, which is comprised of 12 acres of green space, a playground, the shorelines of Lower Manhattan, Brooklyn and Governors Island. picnic benches, as well as great views of The New York City Waterfalls. These Waterfalls range from 90 to 120-feet tall and are on view from Please see the map on page 18 for other locations. June 26 through October 13, 2008. They operate seven days a week, You can listen to comments by the artist about the Waterfalls before your from 7 am to 10 pm, except on Tuesdays and Thursdays, when the visit at www.nycwaterfalls.org (in the podcast section), or during your visit hours are 9 am to 10 pm.
    [Show full text]
  • New-York-Essex-Crossing
    New York NMTC Allocatee Wells Fargo Community Development Enterprises Scott Pinover [email protected] Community Profile Essex Crossing New York, NY Located on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, Essex Crossing - Site 6 is part of a $1.2 billion multi-stage mixed-use development that consists of nine Poverty Rate 35.0% sites on six acres that have sat mostly vacant since 1967. This effort represents one of the most significant revitalization developments in the Median Income 45.9% history of New York City. Phase One of the project includes development of Compared to AMI Site 6, a 14-story, 177,448 square foot mixed-use development that will use both NMTCs and LIHTC funding as parts of its capital stack. Unemployment Rate 9.5% This project is an example of how the LIHTC and NMTC can be used side by Project Highlights side on different portions of a large scale project to meet a variety of community development goals. The financing for this project was partitioned into three separate parts between a NMTC-financed portion totaling $42 Investor: Wells Fargo Bank million, a Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) financed portion, and Co-Allocatees: Low Income another portion used to finance a 3rd floor commercial condo. The project Investment Fund, ESIC New will include four floors of the building occupied by: a 51,000 square-foot Markets Partners, LP medical facility/office space (leased by New York University); a 22,000 square-foot community center run by the non-profit Grand Street Total Project Costs: $42M Settlement; a 4,000 square foot outdoor garden/open space; and 6,000 NMTC: $34.5M square feet of retail.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Clinton Street, New York NY
    Investment Opportunity Lower East Side New York RETAIL CONDOMINIUM AT 20 CLINTON STREET FOR LEASE OR SALE ASKING PRICE Exclusively Offered by RKF INVESTMENT SALES $2 M & ADVISORY SERVICES Executive Summary RKF Investment Sales & Advisory Services (“RKF”) has been retained as the exclusive agent for the sale of 20 Clinton Street, vacant retail condo with 1,250 SF on the Ground Floor and 450 SF in the Lower Level. The Property is situated mid-block with 28 FT of frontage along the east side of Clinton Street between Stanton and East Houston Streets in Manhattan’s historic Lower East Side. The property can accommodate black iron venting for food use. Investment Highlights DYNAMIC LOCATION Located in the Lower East Side, the property benefits from a market that is currently undergoing a dramatic makeover. There is a steady increase in pricing in both the residential and retail rents year-over- year in the Lower East Side, indicative of the market demand and robust market conditions. The neighborhood is “hip” for millennials and has also seen rising interest from families creating an eclectic mix of nightlife, music, art, upscale boutiques, hotels and high-end residential developments. Situated in close proximity to two subway stations with access to the B, D, F, M, J and Z subway lines make it ideal for the surrounding residential and retail developments. NEW DEVELOPMENT Driving the transformation is the $1.1 billion mixed-use Essex Crossing mega project, which is set to deliver 1,100 residential units along with 350,000 SF of office space and 450,000 SF of retail across ten buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Involvement in Redevelopment After the Expiration of Urban Renewal Plans
    Renewing Renewal: Community Involvement in Redevelopment After the Expiration of Urban Renewal Plans A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Preservation COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning by Caroline Thompson May 2020 Abstract Communities impacted by urban renewal in the mid-twentieth century were largely unable to stop the changes brought to their neighborhoods. The plans that operationalized urban renewal remained in place for over 40 years, with significant legislative, legal, and financial effort required to make any alterations. In New York City, many of the urban renewal areas and their governing plans have since expired, ushering in market-driven development and neighborhood changes. This thesis uses a mixed-methods approach to analyze the subsequent built environment changes and to explore community involvement through case studies of redevelopment in the former Seward Park Extension Urban Renewal Area (SPEURA) and Two Bridges Urban Renewal Area (TBURA). While many lots remain unchanged since the urban renewal era, those that have changed reflect local development preferences or the results of major rezonings. The case studies reveal the wide variety of methods of community involvement in site redevelopment, with implications for future participation in redevelopment in the city. Key words: urban renewal, participation, Two Bridges, Essex Crossing, Large-Scale Developments ii Table of Contents List of Figures .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    09_573837 ch05.qxd 12/14/04 11:17 PM Page 85 5 Family-Friendly Dining In the gastronomic universe, New revolving showcase of whipped York has a fair number of star-quality cream–topped desserts. A number of restaurants, but are they worth it if trendy retro coffee shops have opened you’re eating out with your kids? in recent years, adding upscale parent- Fuhgeddaboudit. Le Bernardin and pleasing food to the traditional menu Nobu be damned—what I look for of burgers, omelets, and grilled cheese these days is a restaurant that’s noisy sandwiches. and casual, where the service is rela- I’m not a big fan of eating at side- tively speedy, and where the menu walk tables—I’d rather get away from includes at least one or two items from traffic and exhaust—but as soon as the my kids’ major food groups: chicken weather warms up, many families opt fingers, burgers, pasta, pancakes, and for restaurants with sidewalk seating. pizza, any or all of which could come The open-air arrangement minimizes with a side of fries. You can find your child’s noise, provides endless plenty of such restaurants in New distraction, and makes messes less York, and they won’t cost you an arm important (there’s always a pigeon or and a leg. two around to peck up dropped DINING OUT WITH YOUR KIDS french fries after you’ve cleared off). You know a restaurant welcomes kids Knowing how many Manhattan when they’ve printed up a place mat restaurants don’t work for smaller chil- for young customers to color and dren, for the most part I’ve tried to when you get to keep the crayons steer you towards those that do, you’re given to color it with.
    [Show full text]
  • Rails to Real Estate Development Patterns Along
    Rails to Real Estate Development Patterns along Three New Transit Lines March 2011 About This Study Rails to Real Estate was prepared by the Center for Transit-Oriented Development (CTOD). The CTOD is the only national nonprofit effort dedicated to providing best practices, research and tools to support market- based development in pedestrian-friendly communities near public transportation. We are a partnership of two national nonprofit organizations – Reconnecting America and the Center for Neighborhood Technology – and a research and consulting firm, Strategic Economics. Together, we work at the intersection of transportation planning, regional planning, climate change and sustainability, affordability, economic development, real estate and investment. Our goal is to help create neighborhoods where young and old, rich and poor, can live comfortably and prosper, with affordable and healthy lifestyle choices and ample and easy access to opportunity for all. Report Authors This report was prepared by Nadine Fogarty and Mason Austin, staff of Strategic Economics and CTOD. Additional support and assistance was provided by Eli Popuch, Dena Belzer, Jeff Wood, Abigail Thorne-Lyman, Allison Nemirow and Melissa Higbee. Acknowledgements The Center for Transit-Oriented Development would like to thank the Federal Transit Administration. The authors are also grateful to several persons who assisted with data collection and participated in interviews, including: Bill Sirois, Denver Regional Transit District; Catherine Cox-Blair, Reconnecting America; Caryn Wenzara, City of Denver; Frank Cannon, Continuum Partners, LLC; Gideon Berger, Urban Land Institute/Rose Center; Karen Good, City of Denver; Kent Main, City of Charlotte; Loretta Daniel, City of Aurora; Mark Fabel, McGough; Mark Garner, City of Minneapolis; Michael Lander, Lander Group; Norm Bjornnes, Oaks Properties LLC; Paul Mogush, City of Minneapolis; Peter Q.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epsteins
    the epstein family teacher guide family article family article teacher guide the epsteins who Kalman and Rivka Epstein were Holocaust survivors who immigrated to they the United States in 1947 as refugees. They were unable to return home, are but had difficulty coming to the United States because of restrictive immigration laws. They got help from Kalman’s aunt and uncle who sponsored and supported their journey to New York City. The Lower East Side had a strong Jewish community that also helped to welcome the Epsteins. There were Jewish schools that their daughters Bella and Blima could attend, Yiddish theatres, and synagogues for every Jewish community. The children also explored the diversity of their community by making friends in their building and in the park. primary Video: Bella Returning to 97 Orchard Street sources Bella talks about the mezuzah that is placed on the front doorpost of the apartment, a traditional object used in many Jewish families. This object was both a protective amulet for the home, and also a symbol and portrayal of faith. Bella reflects on the fact that it was a brave statement to put a mezuzah on the front door, considering her parents and family had been persecuted during the Holocaust in Europe. Questions • How do you think Bella feels returning to her for Student childhood home after more than 50 years? Exploration • Why does Bella say it was brave for her parents to put up a Mezuzah? • Do you have anything in your home that expresses your culture and identity? immigration & migration upper elementary unit plan 1 the epstein family teacher guide family article primary Oral History: Bella Discusses Paul Anka sources Bella speaks about the music that permeated the walls of her 103 Or- chard Street apartment.
    [Show full text]