DOCSLIB.ORG

KPN and Electromagnetic Fields KPN and Electromagnetic Fields

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KPN and Electromagnetic Fields KPN and Electromagnetic Fields KPN and Electromagnetic Fields KPN and Electromagnetic Fields Electromagnetic Fields (EMF), or radiation, has attracted increasing attention lately. This document explains KPN’s basic assumptions in this respect: why this debate is important for KPN, what the recent developmeEnts are and their impact, the standards that apply to EMF and the institutes that are involved. What is KPN’s view on EMF? KPN is aware of social concerns about EMF emitted Monitoring Agency), and complies with all by mobile networks. As a provider of mobile com- the advisory guidelines and recommendations. munication services, KPN has clearly defined its role Upon request, KPN provides data to scientists in the debate on radiation. to support their research in the area of EMF and health. • KPN believes that conscientious handling of the health concerns about 5G (and health concerns • KPN acts immediately when the government about EMF emitted by mobile networks in gen- updates standards or advisory guidelines eral) is of crucial importance. As a supplier of vital based on new scientific information. infrastructure, KPN guarantees a mobile network that is safe for people and the environment. • KPN cooperates fully with all relevant authorities, including the regulatory body • KPN complies at all times with the exposure limits Agentschap Telecom (Radiocommunications determined by the ICNIRP (International Com- Agency Netherlands), in conducting EMF mission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection), surveys (i.e. taking regular measurements in the an international group of independent scientists. vicinity of transmitter masts) and publishing the measurement results. • As a provider of 5G and operator of a national mobile network, KPN adheres closely to these • KPN is committed to a safe, responsible rollout of ICNIRP guidelines and other advisory guidelines 5G and sees public support and coordination with published by the government. stakeholders as essential elements. • KPN keeps up with the latest scientific develop- • KPN contributes as much useful and factual ments in this area by monitoring the publica- information as possible to the public debate on tions of leading bodies, such as the Gezond- EMF. In doing so, KPN takes into account the heidsraad (Health Council of the Netherlands), general perception that KPN is a commercial Kennisplatform EMV (Dutch EMF Knowledge provider and therefore a biased party. Other Platform), the RIVM (Dutch National Institute of parties, such as the government, the RIVM and Public Health and Environmental Protection) Kennisplatform EMV, are appropriately positioned and the Antennebureau (Dutch Antenna to independently coordinate the public debate on EMF. 2 KPN and Electromagnetic Fields What are Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)? As a result, ionizing radiation can damage the Broadly speaking, there are two types of electromag- DNA in human cells. This contrasts with the netic fields: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. This non-ionizing radiation associated with all low- distinction is important. When people hear the term frequency electromagnetic fields (between 10 kHz ‘radiation’, they generally think of dangerous forms of and 300 GHz). These radio-frequency fields are radiation such as x-rays and gamma rays. These are used for radio, television, mobile telephones and examples of ionizing radiation where the emitted other appliances and have no ionizing effect. particles or waves carry sufficient energy to detach electrons from atoms. Extremely Low-frequency Fields (ELF) Radio-frequency Fields (RF) Infrared Ultraviolet X-ray radiation Gamma radiation Extremely low-frequency Radio-frequency Fields (RF) Infrared Ultraviolet X-ray Gamma Frequency 1 Hz 10 Hz 102 Hz 103 Hz = 104 Hz 105 Hz 106 Hz = 107 Hz 108 Hz 109 Hz = 1010 Hz 1011 Hz 1012 Hz 1013 Hz 1014 Hz 1015 Hz 1016 Hz 1017 Hz 1018 Hz 1019 Hz 1020 Hz 1021 Hz 1022 Hz 1Khz 1 Mhz 1Ghz Wavelength 100.000 km 10.000km 1.000km 100km 10km 1km 100m 10m 1m 10cm 1cm 1mm 100 um 10um 1um 100nm 10nm 1nm 100pm 10pm 1pm 100fm Non-ionizing Ionizing Visible light The image below shows the radio frequency fields including the different frequencies. Extremely low-frequency Radio-frequency Fields (RF) Infrared Ultraviolet X-ray Gamma Marine radio Aviation Contactless Wireless mouse Analog and Digital TV Smartphone WiFi 2.4 GHz WiFi 5 GHz Satellite TV payment digital radio 10 kHz 5 MHz 50 MHz 400 MHz 1,66 GHz 10 GHz 100 GHz 800 900 1.800 2.100 2.600 MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz Frequency 700 1.400 MHz MHz 700 3.500 26 Current frequencies (2G-4G) MHz MHz GHz New frequencies (2020) 5G frequencies (3.500 MHz from 2022, 26 GHz timing unknown) Exposure limits determined by the ICNIRP The ICNIRP (International Commission on The scientists took the health effects of non-ioniz- Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) has determined ing radiation into account when establishing these the exposure limits for non-ionizing radiation. This ICNIRP guidelines. Strong electromagnetic fields commission consists of an international group of emitted by mobile networks can cause localized independent scientists. heating in parts of the body or the skin, sometimes referred to as ‘thermal effects’. 3 KPN and Electromagnetic Fields Because mobile phones and transmitter masts The first ICNIRP guidelines were published in 1998 may not generate fields that exceed these and adopted by the European Commission in 1999 exposure limits, the thermal effects are limited to in the form of a recommendation to all European a heat increase of no more than 1 degree Celsius. Member States advocating adoption of these In scientific research involving exposure to exposure limits in each State’s national legislation. transmission signals below the exposure limits, In the Netherlands, these guidelines are specified no evidence of possible adverse health effects in a covenant between the government and the has been found. According to the ICNIRP, there is mobile providers. The ICNIRP guideline varies also no scientific evidence indicating that other depending on the spectrum band. The recom- effects (known as ‘non-thermal effects’) have mended level is between 41 V/m and 61 V/m for an adverse effect on health. the spectrum bands used by the Dutch mobile networks (from 700 MHz to 2600 MHz). 50 Hz 900 MHz 1800 MHz 2100 MHz ): ): ): 2 2 2 Country: electric field (V/m) strengt magnetic density (μT) electric field (V/m) strengt magnetic density (μT) equivalent plain power wave density (W/m electric field (V/m) strengt magnetic density (μT) equivalent plain power wave density (W/m electric field (V/m) strengt magnetic density (μT) equivalent plain power wave density (W/m 1999/519/EC 5000 100 41 0.14 4.5 58 0.20 9 61 0.20 10 [Source: Comparison of international policies on electromagnetic fields RIVM 2018] The ICNIRP recently revised its guidelines based In the Netherlands, Agentschap Telecom measures the on twenty years of scientific research. The new, field strengths and the Antennebureau issues informa- updated ICNIRP guidelines were published in tion on antennas and EMF. The information published March 2020 and are therefore completely up to by the Antennebureau (see below) indicates that the date again. The Dutch government intends ICNIRP guidelines include a generous safety margin: to incorporate these new guidelines in new the exposure limits defined by the ICNIRP are 50 times legislation in order to be able to legally lower than the point at which thermal effects occur enforce compliance. (maximum temperature increase of 1 °C). Guideline, exposures, field strength ICNIRP guideline 1°C Factor 50 ICNIRP exposure limits Recommended by the EU and applied in NL Radio broadcasting frequencies > 28 V/m 2G | 3G | 4G | 5G > 39 - 61 V/m Factor 10 Electromagnetic Field Strength in the Netherlands Randomly measured by Agentschap Telecom 0,5 - 3V/m [Source: Antennebureau, May 11, 2020] Furthermore, the results of the EMF measurements limits. These measurement results are available to carried out by Agentschap Telecom show that the the public and shown on a map of the Netherlands. actual radiation levels achieved by Dutch mobile KPN is also well below the ICNIRP guideline operators are 10 times smaller than these exposure at all times. 4 KPN and Electromagnetic Fields Why is EMF important for KPN? The introduction of new technologies such as 5G The Dutch government intends to incorporate has led to concerns among Dutch citizens. KPN is the new ICNIRP guidelines in legislation in 2020 convinced that 5G has a positive effect, because it to ensure official monitoring. At present, the 1998 provides infrastructure for innovative services that ICNIRP guidelines are referred to in the Antenna can be of great value to both businesses and all Covenant, which has been signed by all providers other users. of mobile telecommunication services in the Netherlands, the government and the VNG The rollout of new technologies has also been (the Association of Dutch Municipalities). affected by social and political resistance in the past. The rollout of UMTS for example, when KPN The Agentschap Telecom (Radiocommunications encountered local resistance. In this case, there Agency Netherlands) is the regulatory body for were also concerns about the health aspects of radio communication frequencies and performs UMTS, the third mobile network generation (3G). random checks to measure EMF levels and ensure Remarkably, the launch of LTE (4G) hardly led to that they comply with the agreements stated in any concerns about radiation and health. the Antenna Covenant, i.e. the (old) ICNIRP guidelines. To date, all field strength measure- Which institutions are involved in EMF? ments carried out by Agentschap Telecom indi- cate that KPN and the other providers of mobile The ICNIRP (International Commission on telephony fall comfortably within these limits. Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) is an inter- Click here for more information. national group of scientists who, in 1998, deter- mined the maximum permitted electromagnetic The Antennebureau (Dutch Antenna Monitoring field strength, referred to as the exposure limits or Agency) is the government agency responsible for ICNIRP guidelines.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WWVB: a Half Century of Delivering Accurate Frequency and Time by Radio
    Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004 Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology WWVB: A Half Century of Delivering Accurate Frequency and Time by Radio Michael A. Lombardi and Glenn K. Nelson National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO 80305 [email protected] [email protected] In commemoration of its 50th anniversary of broadcasting from Fort Collins, Colorado, this paper provides a history of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) radio station WWVB. The narrative describes the evolution of the station, from its origins as a source of standard frequency, to its current role as the source of time-of-day synchronization for many millions of radio controlled clocks. Key words: broadcasting; frequency; radio; standards; time. Accepted: February 26, 2014 Published: March 12, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004 1. Introduction NIST radio station WWVB, which today serves as the synchronization source for tens of millions of radio controlled clocks, began operation from its present location near Fort Collins, Colorado at 0 hours, 0 minutes Universal Time on July 5, 1963. Thus, the year 2013 marked the station’s 50th anniversary, a half century of delivering frequency and time signals referenced to the national standard to the United States public. One of the best known and most widely used measurement services provided by the U. S. government, WWVB has spanned and survived numerous technological eras. Based on technology that was already mature and well established when the station began broadcasting in 1963, WWVB later benefitted from the miniaturization of electronics and the advent of the microprocessor, which made low cost radio controlled clocks possible that would work indoors.
    [Show full text]
  • Reception of Low Frequency Time Signals
    Reprinted from I-This reDort show: the Dossibilitks of clock svnchronization using time signals I 9 transmitted at low frequencies. The study was madr by obsirvins pulses Vol. 6, NO. 9, pp 13-21 emitted by HBC (75 kHr) in Switxerland and by WWVB (60 kHr) in tha United States. (September 1968), The results show that the low frequencies are preferable to the very low frequencies. Measurementi show that by carefully selecting a point on the decay curve of the pulse it is possible at distances from 100 to 1000 kilo- meters to obtain time measurements with an accuracy of +40 microseconds. A comparison of the theoretical and experimental reiulb permib the study of propagation conditions and, further, shows the drsirability of transmitting I seconds pulses with fixed envelope shape. RECEPTION OF LOW FREQUENCY TIME SIGNALS DAVID H. ANDREWS P. E., Electronics Consultant* C. CHASLAIN, J. DePRlNS University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium 1. INTRODUCTION parisons of atomic clocks, it does not suffice for clock For several years the phases of VLF and LF carriers synchronization (epoch setting). Presently, the most of standard frequency transmitters have been monitored accurate technique requires carrying portable atomic to compare atomic clock~.~,*,3 clocks between the laboratories to be synchronized. No matter what the accuracies of the various clocks may be, The 24-hour phase stability is excellent and allows periodic synchronization must be provided. Actually frequency calibrations to be made with an accuracy ap- the observed frequency deviation of 3 x 1o-l2 between proaching 1 x 10-11. It is well known that over a 24- cesium controlled oscillators amounts to a timing error hour period diurnal effects occur due to propagation of about 100T microseconds, where T, given in years, variations.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Years of VLF Worldwide Comparison of Atomic Frequency Standards
    RADIO SCIENCE, Vol. 2 (New Series), No. 6, June 1967 Five Years of VLF Worldwide Comparison of Atomic Frequency Standards B. E. Blair,' E. 1. Crow,2 and A. H. Morgan (Received January 19, 1967) The VLF radio broadcasts of GBR(16.0 kHz), NBA(18.0 or 24.0 kHz), and NSS(21.4 kHz) have enabled worldwide comparisons of atomic frequency standards to parts in 1O'O when received over varied paths and at distances up to 9000 or more kilometers. This paper summarizes a statistical analysis of such comparison data from laboratories in England, France, Switzerland, Sweden, Russia, Japan, Canada, and the United States during the 5-year period 1961-1965. The basic data are dif- ferences in 24-hr average frequencies between the local atomic standard and the received VLF radio signal expressed as parts in 10"'. The analysis of the more recent data finds the receiving laboratory standard deviations, &, and the transmission standard deviation, ?, to be a few parts in 10". Averag- ing frequencies over an increasing number of days has the effect of reducing iUi and ? to some extent. The variation of the & with propagation distance is studied. The VLF-LF long-term mean differences between standards are compared with the recent portable clock tests, and they agree to parts in IO". 1. Introduction points via satellites (Steele, Markowitz, and Lidback, 1964; Markowitz, Lidback, Uyeda, and Muramatsu, Six years ago in London, the XIIIth General Assem- 1966); improvements in the transmission of VLF and bly of URSI adopted a resolution (No. 2) which strongly LF radio signals (Milton, Fey, and Morgan, 1962; recommended continuous very-low-frequency (VLF) Barnes, Andrews, and Allan, 1965; Bonanomi, 1966; and low-frequency (LF) transmission monitoring US.
    [Show full text]
  • High Frequency (HF)
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1990-06 High Frequency (HF) radio signal amplitude characteristics, HF receiver site performance criteria, and expanding the dynamic range of HF digital new energy receivers by strong signal elimination Lott, Gus K., Jr. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/34806 NPS62-90-006 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, ,California DISSERTATION HIGH FREQUENCY (HF) RADIO SIGNAL AMPLITUDE CHARACTERISTICS, HF RECEIVER SITE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA, and EXPANDING THE DYNAMIC RANGE OF HF DIGITAL NEW ENERGY RECEIVERS BY STRONG SIGNAL ELIMINATION by Gus K. lott, Jr. June 1990 Dissertation Supervisor: Stephen Jauregui !)1!tmlmtmOlt tlMm!rJ to tJ.s. eave"ilIE'il Jlcg6iielw olil, 10 piolecl ailicallecl",olog't dU'ie 18S8. Btl,s, refttteste fer litis dOCdiii6i,1 i'lust be ,ele"ed to Sapeihil6iiddiil, 80de «Me, "aial Postg;aduulG Sclleel, MOli'CIG" S,e, 98918 &988 SF 8o'iUiid'ids" PM::; 'zt6lI44,Spawd"d t4aoal \\'&u 'al a a,Sloi,1S eai"i,al'~. 'Nsslal.;gtePl. Be 29S&B &198 .isthe 9aleMBe leclu,sicaf ,.,FO'iciaKe" 6alite., ea,.idiO'. Statio", AlexB •• d.is, VA. !!!eN 8'4!. ,;M.41148 'fl'is dUcO,.Mill W'ilai.,s aliilical data wlrose expo,l is idst,icted by tli6 Arlil! Eurse" SSPItial "at FRIis ee, 1:I.9.e. gec. ii'S1 sl. seq.) 01 tlls Exr;01l ftle!lIi"isllatioli Act 0' 19i'9, as 1tI'I'I0"e!ee!, "Filill ell, W.S.€'I ,0,,,,, 1i!4Q1, III: IIlIiI. 'o'iolatioils of ltrese expo,lla;;s ale subject to 960616 an.iudl pSiiaities.
    [Show full text]
  • NIST Time and Frequency Services (NIST Special Publication 432)
    Time & Freq Sp Publication A 2/13/02 5:24 PM Page 1 NIST Special Publication 432, 2002 Edition NIST Time and Frequency Services Michael A. Lombardi Time & Freq Sp Publication A 2/13/02 5:24 PM Page 2 Time & Freq Sp Publication A 4/22/03 1:32 PM Page 3 NIST Special Publication 432 (Minor text revisions made in April 2003) NIST Time and Frequency Services Michael A. Lombardi Time and Frequency Division Physics Laboratory (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 432, dated June 1991) January 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Donald L. Evans, Secretary TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION Phillip J. Bond, Under Secretary for Technology NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY Arden L. Bement, Jr., Director Time & Freq Sp Publication A 2/13/02 5:24 PM Page 4 Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY SPECIAL PUBLICATION 432 (SUPERSEDES NIST SPECIAL PUBLICATION 432, DATED JUNE 1991) NATL. INST.STAND.TECHNOL. SPEC. PUBL. 432, 76 PAGES (JANUARY 2002) CODEN: NSPUE2 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 2002 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Website: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202)
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation of Very Low and Low Frequency Signal Variations at Mid-Latitudes with Magnetic Activity and Outer-Zone Particles
    Ann. Geophys., 32, 1455–1462, 2014 www.ann-geophys.net/32/1455/2014/ doi:10.5194/angeo-32-1455-2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Correlation of very low and low frequency signal variations at mid-latitudes with magnetic activity and outer-zone particles A. Rozhnoi1, M. Solovieva1, V. Fedun2, M. Hayakawa3, K. Schwingenschuh4, and B. Levin5 1Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, 10 B. Gruzinskaya, Moscow, 123995, Russia 2Space Systems Laboratory, Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK 3University of Electro-Communications, Advanced Wireless Communications Research Center, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu Tokyo, 182-8585, Japan 4Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, 6 Schmiedlstraße, 8042, Graz, Austria 5Institute of marine geology and geophysics Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 1B Nauki str., Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 693022, Russia Correspondence to: A. Rozhnoi ([email protected]) Received: 31 May 2014 – Revised: 28 October 2014 – Accepted: 31 October 2014 – Published: 4 December 2014 Abstract. The disturbances of very low and low frequency Hayakawa, 2008; Hayakawa et al., 2010; Hayakawa, 2011; signals in the lower mid-latitude ionosphere caused by mag- Biagi et al., 2004, 2007; Rozhnoi et al., 2004, 2009). This netic storms, proton bursts and relativistic electron fluxes band of electromagnetic waves is trapped between the lower are investigated on the basis of VLF–LF measurements ob- ionosphere and the surface of the Earth, and reflected from tained in the Far East and European networks. We have found the boundary between the upper atmosphere and lower iono- that magnetic storm (−150 < Dst < −100 nT) influence is sphere at altitudes of ≈ 70 km (daytime) and ≈ 90 km (night- not strong on variations of VLF–LF signals.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying and Removing Tilt Noise from Low-Frequency (0.1
    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90, 4, pp. 952–963, August 2000 Identifying and Removing Tilt Noise from Low-Frequency (Ͻ0.1 Hz) Seafloor Vertical Seismic Data by Wayne C. Crawford and Spahr C. Webb Abstract Low-frequency (Ͻ0.1 Hz) vertical-component seismic noise can be re- duced by 25 dB or more at seafloor seismic stations by subtracting the coherent signals derived from (1) horizontal seismic observations associated with tilt noise, and (2) pressure measurements related to infragravity waves. The reduction in ef- fective noise levels is largest for the poorest stations: sites with soft sediments, high currents, shallow water, or a poorly leveled seismometer. The importance of precise leveling is evident in our measurements: low-frequency background vertical seismic radians 4מ10 ן spectra measured on a seafloor seismometer leveled to within 1 (0.006 degrees) are up to 20 dB quieter than on a nearby seismometer leveled to radians (0.2 degrees). The noise on the less precisely leveled sensor 3מ10 ן within 3 increases with decreasing frequency and is correlated with ocean tides, indicating that it is caused by tilting due to seafloor currents flowing across the instrument. At low frequencies, this tilting generates a seismic signal by changing the gravitational attraction on the geophones as they rotate with respect to the earth’s gravitational field. The effect is much stronger on the horizontal components than on the vertical, allowing significant reduction in vertical-component noise by subtracting the coher- ent horizontal component noise. This technique reduces the low-frequency vertical noise on the less-precisely leveled seismometer to below the noise level on the pre- cisely leveled seismometer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of the Ionosphere on Ultra-Low-Frequency Radio-Interferometric Observations? F
    A&A 615, A179 (2018) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833012 & © ESO 2018 Astrophysics The effect of the ionosphere on ultra-low-frequency radio-interferometric observations? F. de Gasperin1,2, M. Mevius3, D. A. Rafferty2, H. T. Intema1, and R. A. Fallows3 1 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 Hamburger Sternwarte, Universität Hamburg, Gojenbergsweg 112, 21029 Hamburg, Germany 3 ASTRON – the Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy, PO Box 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands Received 13 March 2018 / Accepted 19 April 2018 ABSTRACT Context. The ionosphere is the main driver of a series of systematic effects that limit our ability to explore the low-frequency (<1 GHz) sky with radio interferometers. Its effects become increasingly important towards lower frequencies and are particularly hard to calibrate in the low signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) regime in which low-frequency telescopes operate. Aims. In this paper we characterise and quantify the effect of ionospheric-induced systematic errors on astronomical interferometric radio observations at ultra-low frequencies (<100 MHz). We also provide guidelines for observations and data reduction at these frequencies with the LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR) and future instruments such as the Square Kilometre Array (SKA). Methods. We derive the expected systematic error induced by the ionosphere. We compare our predictions with data from the Low Band Antenna (LBA) system of LOFAR. Results. We show that we can isolate the ionospheric effect in LOFAR LBA data and that our results are compatible with satellite measurements, providing an independent way to measure the ionospheric total electron content (TEC).
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Low Frequency Active Acoustics As a Critical
    Low-Frequency Acoustics as an Antisubmarine Warfare Technology GORDON D. TYLER, JR. THE EMERGENCE OF LOW–FREQUENCY ACTIVE ACOUSTICS AS A CRITICAL ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE TECHNOLOGY For the three decades following World War II, the United States realized unparalleled success in strategic and tactical antisubmarine warfare operations by exploiting the high acoustic source levels of Soviet submarines to achieve long detection ranges. The emergence of the quiet Soviet submarine in the 1980s mandated that new and revolutionary approaches to submarine detection be developed if the United States was to continue to achieve its traditional antisubmarine warfare effectiveness. Since it is immune to sound-quieting efforts, low-frequency active acoustics has been proposed as a replacement for traditional passive acoustic sensor systems. The underlying science and physics behind this technology are currently being investigated as part of an urgent U.S. Navy initiative, but the United States and its NATO allies have already begun development programs for fielding sonars using low-frequency active acoustics. Although these first systems have yet to become operational in deep water, research is also under way to apply this technology to Third World shallow-water areas and to anticipate potential countermeasures that an adversary may develop. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE The nature of naval warfare changed dramatically capability of their submarine forces, and both countries following the conclusion of World War II when, in Jan- have come to regard these submarines as principal com- uary 1955, the USS Nautilus sent the message, “Under ponents of their tactical naval forces, as well as their way on nuclear power,” while running submerged from strategic arsenals.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular $2.50 Canada
    ICD-08635 JUNE 1986 $1.95 POPULAR $2.50 CANADA Now Incorporating SeSC011 Magazine The Official Publication of the Scanner Association of North America www.americanradiohistory.com ASLEEP...AWAY...ON-THE-JOB... DON'T MISS ANYTHING ON YOUR SCANNER Exclusive! Monitor volume Exclusive! Voice -tailored Exclusive! Delay time con- control is independent of speaker system for trol adjusts to hold for recording volume. listening clarity. reply messages. Exclusive! VOX level light Exclusive! Attractive assures perfect adjustment. molded high -impact cabinetry. A.do 11.,,_ 00e10110110) U.L. listed power supply ERTM included. TrJer:Activator A permanent record even when you're Hear while you record. not there! "What used to drive me crazy was that MONEY BACK GUARANTEE "Before I installed NiteLogger I always anytime the recorder was plugged into If you're dissatisfied in any way with seemed to miss the big stories'..." Now the scanner, the speaker was cut-off so Nitelogger, just return it to us prepaid solve the biggest frustration of scanner I couldn't hear what was going on!" within 25 days for a prompt, courteous enthusiasts: NiteLogger makes sure you'll NiteLogger's built-in monitor speaker and refund. For One Full Year NiteLogger hear it all, even if it happens at 3:47 a.m.! Monitor Level control solves the problem. is guaranteed to be free of defects in Foolproof operation...works every You control the volume from off to full on, workmanship and materials. Simply time! independent of recording levels. send prepaid to BMI for warranty repair. "I've tried rigging up recorders before only Buy with absolute confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Navigational Aids
    RADIO NAVIGATIONAL AIDS Publication No. 117 2014 Edition Prepared and published by the NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Springfield, VA © COPYRIGHT 2014 BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT NO COPYRIGHT CLAIMED UNDER TITLE 17 U.S.C. WARNING ON USE OF FLOATING AIDS TO NAVIGATION TO FIX A NAVIGATIONAL POSITION The aids to navigation depicted on charts comprise a system consisting of fixed and floating aids with varying degrees of reliability. Therefore, prudent mariners will not rely solely on any single aid to navigation, particularly a floating aid. The buoy symbol is used to indicate the approximate position of the buoy body and the sinker which secures the buoy to the seabed. The approximate position is used because of practical limitations in positioning and maintaining buoys and their sinkers in precise geographical locations. These limitations include, but are not limited to, inherent imprecisions in position fixing methods, prevailing atmospheric and sea conditions, the slope of and the material making up the seabed, the fact that buoys are moored to sinkers by varying lengths of chain, and the fact that buoy and/or sinker positions are not under continuous surveillance but are normally checked only during periodic maintenance visits which often occur more than a year apart. The position of the buoy body can be expected to shift inside and outside the charting symbol due to the forces of nature. The mariner is also cautioned that buoys are liable to be carried away, shifted, capsized, sunk, etc. Lighted buoys may be extinguished or sound signals may not function as the result of ice or other natural causes, collisions, or other accidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Time and Frequency Users' Manual
    ,>'.)*• r>rJfl HKra mitt* >\ « i If I * I IT I . Ip I * .aference nbs Publi- cations / % ^m \ NBS TECHNICAL NOTE 695 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/National Bureau of Standards Time and Frequency Users' Manual 100 .U5753 No. 695 1977 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 1 The National Bureau of Standards was established by an act of Congress March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is to strengthen and advance the Nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit To this end, the Bureau conducts research and provides: (1) a basis for the Nation's physical measurement system, (2) scientific and technological services for industry and government, a technical (3) basis for equity in trade, and (4) technical services to pro- mote public safety. The Bureau consists of the Institute for Basic Standards, the Institute for Materials Research the Institute for Applied Technology, the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology, the Office for Information Programs, and the Office of Experimental Technology Incentives Program. THE INSTITUTE FOR BASIC STANDARDS provides the central basis within the United States of a complete and consist- ent system of physical measurement; coordinates that system with measurement systems of other nations; and furnishes essen- tial services leading to accurate and uniform physical measurements throughout the Nation's scientific community, industry, and commerce. The Institute consists of the Office of Measurement Services, and the following center and divisions: Applied Mathematics
    [Show full text]