(Public Pack)Agenda Document for South Buckinghamshire Area Planning Committee, 27/10/2020 14:30

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Public Pack)Agenda Document for South Buckinghamshire Area Planning Committee, 27/10/2020 14:30 South Buckinghamshire Area Planning Committee agenda Date: Tuesday 27 October 2020 Time: 2.30 pm Venue: Via Microsoft Teams Membership: T Egleton (Chairman), D Anthony, M Bradford, S Chhokar, B Gibbs, P Griffin, G Hollis, M Lewis, Dr W Matthews and R Reed Webcasting notice Please note: this meeting may be filmed for live or subsequent broadcast via the council's website. At the start of the meeting the chairman will confirm if all or part of the meeting is being filmed. You should be aware that the council is a data controller under the Data Protection Act. Data collected during this webcast will be retained in accordance with the council’s published policy. Therefore by entering the meeting room, you are consenting to being filmed and to the possible use of those images and sound recordings for webcasting and/or training purposes. If members of the public do not wish to have their image captured they should ask the committee clerk, who will advise where to sit. If you have any queries regarding this, please contact the Legal & Democratic Service Director at [email protected]. Public Speaking If you have any queries concerning public speaking at Planning Committee meetings, including registering your intention to speak, please speak to a member of the Planning team – [email protected] 01494 732950. Please refer to the Guide to Public Speaking at Planning Committee here. Agenda Item Page No 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of Interest 3 Minutes 3 - 4 To note the minutes of the meeting held on 29 September 2020. Applications to be Determined 4 PL/20/1685/FA - Land South of Rowley Lane, Wexham, 5 - 32 Buckinghamshire 5 PL/20/0671/OA - Land Adjacent To Limewood Gate, Poyle Lane, 33 - 60 Burnham, Buckinghamshire, SL1 8LE 6 PL/20/2186/FA - 18 Station Parade, Denham Green, Buckinghamshire, 61 - 72 UB9 5ET 7 Date and Time of the next meeting Tuesday 24th November at 2:30PM. If you would like to attend a meeting, but need extra help to do so, for example because of a disability, please contact us as early as possible, so that we can try to put the right support in place. For further information please contact: Tom Fowler on 01494 732009, email [email protected]. Agenda Item 3 Buckinghamshire Council South Buckinghamshire Area Planning Committee Minutes MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SOUTH BUCKINGHAMSHIRE AREA PLANNING COMMITTEE HELD ON TUESDAY 29 SEPTEMBER 2020 VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS, COMMENCING AT 2.30 PM AND CONCLUDING AT 3.56 PM MEMBERS PRESENT T Egleton (Chairman), D Anthony, M Bradford, S Chhokar, B Gibbs, P Griffin, G Hollis, M Lewis and Dr W Matthews Agenda Item 1 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies had been received from Councillor R Reed. 2 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Councillor W Matthews declared a personal and prejudicial interest in PL/20/2033/FA as a close associate of the applicant and would leave the meeting during consideration of this item. Councillor M Bradford declared a personal and prejudicial interest in PL/20/2033/FA as a close associate of the applicant and would leave the meeting during consideration of this item. 3 MINUTES The minutes of the meeting held on 1 September 2020 were agreed as an accurate record. 4 PL/20/2033/FA - 4 SLOUGH ROAD, IVER HEATH, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, SL0 0DR Proposal: Single storey rear extension Notes Councillor W Matthews and Councillor M Bradford left the meeting for consideration of this item. Councillor L Sullivan declared a personal and prejudicial interest as the applicant of the application and would leave the meeting following completion of the Public speaking segment. The Case Officer confirmed that the Applicant had very recently submitted amended plans and very special circumstances. As the officers needed time to assess these material considerations, the application was considered as submitted and referred to in the report. It was also confirmed that the proposed roof light benefited from Permitted Page 3 Development. Speaking on behalf of the applicant: Mr Alan Munro. Councillor Sullivan left the meeting following the Public speaking segment. It was proposed by Councillor S Chhokar seconded by Councillor D Anthony and RESOLVED: That planning permission be refused as recommended for the reasons laid out in the report. 5 PL/19/4275/FA - LAND AT REAR OF NO.11 AND FRONTING ON TO, 11 REYNOLDS ROAD, 11 PENN ROAD, BEACONSFIELD, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, HP9 2PN Proposal: Alteration to front elevation of existing single storey building and change of use from B8 Storage and Distribution unit to Sui-Generis Car Wash and Valet service. Notes: Councillor W Matthews and Councillor M Bradford re-joined the meeting. The Planning Officer recommended that Condition 2 be amended to include the requirement that the development shall be operated in accordance with the submitted transport statement and parking and servicing management plan. The Democratic Services Officer read out a statement on behalf of the applicant: Aqua Valet Ltd It was proposed by Councillor W Matthews, seconded by Councillor G Hollis and RESOLVED: That permission be granted subject to the conditions laid out in the report and the amended condition no 2 noted above. 6 PL/19/4444/FA - 13 COPPERFIELDS, BEACONSFIELD, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, HP9 2NS Proposal: Four new detached dwellings with associated garages, access, parking and landscaping, following the demolition of the existing dwelling. Notes: The Case Officer updated the committee on developments since agenda publication. There had been 3 further letters of objection received, but these did not raise any new/additional material planning considerations. It was noted that planning permission had been granted on appeal for a similar development at this site previously. This previous scheme was considered relevant in assessing the appropriate level of development on the site and constituted a material consideration in the assessment of this application. Speaking on behalf of the Objectors: Mr Sebastian Steinfeld Speaking on behalf of the applicant: Mr David Cox It was proposed by Councillor W Matthews, seconded by Councillor M Bradford and RESOLVED: That the application be delegated to the Director of Planning and Environment to grant planning permission subject to the conditions set out in this report and any others which he considers appropriate and the satisfactory prior completion of a Legal Agreement relating to mitigation of Burnham Beeches SAC. If the Legal Agreement cannot be completed, that the application be refused for such reasons as considered appropriate. Page 4 Agenda Item 4 Buckinghamshire Council www.buckinghamshire.gov.uk Report to South Buckinghamshire Area Planning Committee Site Location: Land South of Rowley Lane, Wexham, Buckinghamshire Proposal: Residential development consisting of 5 no. dwellings with associated access and landscaping, following demolition of existing buildings associated with the livery and storage uses on site. ___________________________________________________________________________ Application Number: PL/20/1685/FA Applicant: Daniel Family Homes Case Officer: Richard Regan Ward affected: Stoke Poges & Wexham Parish Council: Wexham Parish Council Valid date: 1 June 2020 Determination date: 27 October 2020 Recommendation: Delegate the application to the Director of Planning and Environment to GRANT planning permission subject to the conditions set out in this report and any others which he considers appropriate and the satisfactory prior completion of a Legal Agreement relating to mitigation of Burnham Beeches SAC. If the Legal Agreement cannot be completed the application be refused for such reasons as considered appropriate. ___________________________________________________________________________ 1.0 Summary & Recommendation/ Reason for Planning Committee Consideration 1.1 The application proposes the redevelopment of the site, which lies within the Green Belt, to provide a residential development consisting of 5 dwellings following the demolition of all existing buildings. Page 5 1.2 The proposal to redevelop this previously developed site would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt or its purposes. The proposal would therefore meet with the exception to inappropriate development set out in set out in point G of para. 145 of the NPPF and no objections are raised with regard to the impact on the Green Belt. 1.3 Planning permission has previously been granted on part of this site for its redevelopment to provide 2 detached dwellings under reference 16/01262/FUL. 1.4 The application has been referred to the Planning Committee following discussions between Officer and the Chairman. In the Interests of the wider public it is considered that the application would benefit from further scrutiny. 1.5 The recommendation for this application is conditional permission. 2.0 Description of Proposed Development 2.1 The application proposes the redevelopment of the site to provide a residential development consisting of 5no. dwellings with associated access and landscaping, following demolition of existing buildings. The proposed development involves the land edged in red in the submitted plans. None of the land edged in blue on the submitted plans is to be developed, and would remain as open paddock land. 2.2 It is important to note that planning permission has previously been granted on part of this site for its redevelopment to provide 2 detached dwellings under reference 16/01262/FUL. That scheme, which was allowed at appeal, incorporated the southern half of the section of the site which has buildings on it. It is considered that that permission constitutes an important material consideration in the assessment of this current application. 2.3 The main differences between that previously approved scheme and the current application are that this current application is larger, and incorporates the northern section of the site, and it is proposed to create 4 dwellings on the southern half of the site, as opposed to the 2 which were allowed at appeal. 2.4 All of the existing buildings and structures on the site would be demolished in their entirety, and replaced with 5 new dwellings.
Recommended publications
  • Review of the Local Plan for Slough
    Review of the Local Plan for Slough Consultation on the Call for Sites and other potential Local Plan sites 3 June to 15 July 2016 Review of the Slough Local Plan Consultation on the Call for Sites, 3 June - 15 July 2016 Executive summary The purpose of this consultation is to find out what One of the reasons for carrying out the consultation people think about the various proposals that have exercise at this stage is that we will be able to feed been submitted for the future use of sites in Slough. the results into the review of the Local Plan for Slough. This is looking at how Slough could be These have come forward as a result of a “Call for developed in the next twenty years up to 2026. Sites” exercise which the Council carried out at the beginning of the year. That asked landowners, In addition to the proposals submitted by the public developers, organisations and members of the we are also seeking views on some proposals that public whether they knew of any sites which could have been put forward by the Planning potentially be allocated for development in the new Department. It should be noted that these Local Plan. It made clear that although there is a proposals have not been endorsed by the Council particular shortage of land for housing, the as the Local Planning Authority and so do not carry consultation also sought suggestions for a range of any weight at this stage. uses such as employment, open space or In order to help people understand some of the community uses as these are also important for context of what is happening in Slough we have Slough’s communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Spelthorne M E a N S B U S I N E S S
    SPELTHORNE M E A N S B U S I N E S S Economic Strategy 2017 - 2022 Foreword Cllr Colin Barnard The Spelthorne Economic Development Strategy 2017-2022 builds upon the Borough’s first economic strategy 2013 – 16 and focus on prioritising the key needs for business to settle, grow and thrive. Through the strategy the Borough aims to realise its ambitions and release its potential as a leading economy not just in Surrey but the wider sub-region. The strategy has been produced at a time when the local, national and international economies are all taking stock and preparing for the future with regards to the impact of significant events and decisions such as the Governments preferred location of Heathrow for the UK’s additional runway, southern rail access to Heathrow, plans around business rates retention and setting, and of course Brexit. The health of the Spelthorne economy has shown remarkable growth over a number of years, as evidenced by our position in the top quartile of local authorities in the UK for competitiveness, 17th best location for high tech occupations and with Staines- upon-Thames identified as the fastest growing town in the UK for new start-up businesses. Spelthorne possesses the foundations envied by other locations, particularly given its proximity to London and Heathrow, forming part of a powerfully functional economic area; the M3, M4 and M25 which help drive the prosperity of the south east all run through or in close proximity to Spelthorne. Members and Officers of the Council are united in working hard to ensure that economic growth and the associated benefits to our community continue to grow and Spelthorne can compete with the best.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Boundaries in East of Slough (PDF)
    SHEET 3, MAP 3 Proposed ward boundaries in east Slough NurseriesPinewood Golf Course Snitterfield E Farm N A Snitterfield L House S Swimming N Pool O E L L A Stoke Poges G GreenAcres Lane Lodge FarmhouseBell FarmBell Bell Farm n T Stoke House r E Wexham Park Hospital a E B R The School d House e n l T k e O S o e t r Arbory e M S G BarnTheh A THouse Stoke H FarmhouseGreen Red Lion X Lodge Butlers E Stoke Green W STO House KE G Red LionPark REEN View Stoke Green Cricket Ground C THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND HUR CH LA WEXHAM PARK LANE V A L D C Gravel Pit C L A u o E W M P L K L M T H n l ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SLOUGH O HouseWoodlands in Tioh z Y i a a The Pantiles Merry e a t the Wood a h o Lea u e t R m r C n g l Greystonese l E u l a e k n b n i a s m l n N M u O w V e o l e o t D A a d r a l e i o e i l r r s o W a l y H k r e Nelaton w W House e o t E s X CleathLow Ridge h X p R w P H o E p J E A n o i o M A e L i n p Waldeck ' n s W s T d P r k o g p u L d e A l c a i e f l a R Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the borough of Slough May 2012 o a n Q i a n t e K L r y n r r b s g f L r i e Red B B y e d A a l O N i n a E i n l s V E n a d RO e G e k CH Playing Field Oakways HUR Sheet 3 of 3 Nursery CrantockC Wexham School BungalowWoodside Delmo The Linnet Stone's Wood Gravel Pit Bracklesham Hillcrest SunnyviewInvershin Lane End KingstoneS House Green Pickets WOOD EXHAM Puckspool W Cambridge D Failte Mor A The ShielingWexmere O Greencorner R D This mapE is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of EWOO GRANG G the ControllerID of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Common Ground with Spelthorne Borough Council
    Statement of Common Ground with Spelthorne Borough Council Part 1: Strategic context Geographical area covered by Statement of Common Ground (SoCG) and justification for why this geography is appropriate: This SoCG covers the local authority areas of Runnymede Borough Council and Spelthorne Borough Council as shown in the map extract at Annex 1. This geographical area has been chosen as the Runnymede-Spelthorne SHMA (November 2015) determined that these two local authorities for a Housing Market Area (HMA) and HMA geography is considered to be the most appropriate starting point to produce a SoCG. It is also relevant that the evidence collated by both Local Authorities supports that Runnymede and Spelthorne have the strongest functional links from an economic perspective with each other as well as strong retail links. Wider relationships with Runnymede and Spelthorne: The 2015 SHMA concluded that the Runnymede-Spelthorne HMA has notable links with overlapping local housing markets which reflects the density of transport networks, both road and rail. Links were concluded to be particularly strong with Elmbridge, Hounslow and Woking. There are also notable links between the Runnymede- Spelthorne HMA and London due to outward migration pressures and strong commuting patterns. There are also recognised links between both Local Authorities and Heathrow Airport. Indeed, both Local Authorities are considered to sit in a sub regional Heathrow Functional Economic Area. The Spelthorne FEA analysis (March 2017) concludes that Spelthome holds its strongest economic links with Runnymede, followed by Elmbridge and the London Borough of Hounslow. Woking and the London Borough of Richmond-upon-Thames are found to influence the FEA to a much lesser extent.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Boundaries in East Slough (PDF)
    SHEET 3, MAP 3 Proposed ward boundaries in east Slough NurseriesPinewood Golf Course Snitterfield E Farm N A Snitterfield L House S Swimming N Pool O E L L A Stoke Poges G GreenAcres Lane Lodge FarmhouseBell FarmBell Bell Farm n T Stoke House r E Wexham Park Hospital a E B R The School d House e n l T k e O S o e t r Arbory e M S G BarnTheh A THouse Stoke H FarmhouseGreen Red Lion X Lodge Butlers E Stoke Green W STO House KE G Red LionPark REEN View Stoke Green Cricket Ground C THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND HUR CH LA WEXHAM PARK LANE V A L D C Gravel Pit C L A u o E W M P L K L M T H n l ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SLOUGH O HouseWoodlands in Tioh z Y i a a The Pantiles Merry e a t the Wood a h o Lea u e t R m r C n g l Greystonese l E u l a e k n b n i a s m l n N M u O w V e o l e o t D A a d r a l e i o e i l r r s o W a l y H k r e Nelaton w W House e o t E s X CleathLow Ridge h X p R w P H o E p J E A n o i o M A e L i n p Waldeck ' n s W s T d P r k o g p u L d e A l c a i e f l a R Draft recommendations for ward boundaries in the borough of Slough December 2011 o a n Q i a n t e K L r y n r r b s g f L r i e Red B B y e d A a l O N i n a E i n l s V E n a d RO e G e k CH Playing Field Oakways HUR Sheet 3 of 3 Nursery CrantockC Wexham School BungalowWoodside Delmo The Linnet Stone's Wood Gravel Pit Bracklesham Hillcrest SunnyviewInvershin Lane End KingstoneS House Green Pickets WOOD EXHAM Puckspool W Cambridge D Failte Mor A The ShielingWexmere O Greencorner R D This mapE is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of EWOO GRANG G the ControllerID of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Slough Area Guide
    INTRODUCTION EDUCATION LEISURE HEALTH OTHER Why Chiltern Relocation loves Slough: It is a vibrant town with a wide range Slough of facilities on offer - Slough offers the buzz and diversity of the town centre but also the proximity of beautiful riverside towns and villages. area guide Slough is located 23 miles west of London and with commuting times of 35 minutes into London Paddington. The town is best known for being home to numerous large international companies and as such, Slough boasts an ethnically diverse community as witnessed by the great variety of shopping Distances and restaurants in the surrounding area. Heathrow 11 miles 16 minutes Gatwick 49 miles 56 minutes The Slough Project is currently investing £450million into the town and this M25 16 miles 27 minutes includes a new state of the art library and cultural centre. The town offers a M4 4 miles 10 minutes wide range of sports and leisure facilities including a popular ice skating Train London - Paddington rink. Just moments from Slough is the internationally famous Olympic Eton 35 minutes Dorney rowing lake where many people enjoy learning to row or simply walking or cycling around the lake. There is also an excellent café at Eton Chiltern Relocation Dorney. Call us now to discuss your needs. Slough is also very well placed for its proximity to Heathrow, the M4, M25. t +44 (0) 1494 672086 Many people who work in Slough, but do not wish to live in such a busy m +44 (0) 7718 533722 town, choose to live in Windsor, Maidenhead and Gerrards Cross where there are excellent schooling options available.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps Covering Berkshire HYDROCARBONS 00 450 500
    10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 905 00 000 10 20 2 000 2 000 00 CHALK BRICK CLAY BGS maps covering Berkshire HYDROCARBONS 00 450 500 The term ‘brick clay' is used to describe clay used predominantly in the manufacture of bricks and, to a lesser extent, roof tiles and clay Chalk is a relatively soft, fine-grained, white limestone, consisting mostly of the debris of planktonic algae. In Berkshire, chalk crops out 268 Conventional Oil and Gas across a third of the county, particularly in the west and northeast where it forms the prominent natural feature of the Chalk Downlands. pipes. These clays may sometimes be used in cement manufacture, as a source of construction fill and for lining and sealing landfill Report 12 1:63 360 and 1:50 000 map published Approximately two thirds of the chalk outcrop in Berkshire lies within the North Wessex Downs AONB. The Chalk is divided into the sites. The suitability of a clay for the manufacture of bricks depends principally on its behaviour during shaping, drying and firing. This 253 254 255 The county of Berkshire occupies a large tract of land to the north of a prominent line of en echelon anticlinal structures across southern Grey Chalk (formerly the Lower Chalk) and White Chalk (formerly the Middle and Upper Chalk) Subgroups. The White Chalk subgroup is will dictate the properties of the fired brick such as strength and frost resistance and, importantly, its architectural appearance. Britain. These folds mark the northern limits of the Palaeogene (Alpine) inversion of the main faults that controlled the development of the the most extensive with the underlying Grey Chalk Subgroup only cropping out as narrow bands at Walbury Hill and Lambourn, in the Report 64 Report 32 Report 42 Report 12 1:25 000 map published (Industrial west of the county and at Streatley in the north of the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan for Slough Slough Borough Council
    Local Plan for Slough Slough Borough Council STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT LEVEL 1 March 2021 DRAFT Revision 4 Planning Policy and Projects Slough Borough Council Observatory House 25 Windsor Road, Slough, SL1 2EJ Phone: 01753 477340 Email: [email protected] DRAFT Contents Chapter Page Glossary 5 Abbreviations 5 Definitions 6 Executive summary 10 1. Introduction 11 1.1. Purpose of the SFRA 11 1.2. Approach to strategic flood risk management 12 2. Study area 14 2.1. Local Planning Authority area 14 2.2. Topography 14 2.3. Geology 15 2.4. Hydrogeology 17 2.5. Watercourses 17 3. Policy and flood risk responsibility 26 3.1. National legislation 26 3.2. National policy 26 3.3. Regional policy 30 3.4. Local policy 30 3.5. Risk Management Authorities 33 3.6. Consultation 33 4. SFRA approach 34 4.1. Sequential Test 34 4.2. Flood Zones 34 4.3. Land use vulnerability 35 4.4. Exception Test 36 5. Flood risk in Slough 37 5.1. Data collection 37 5.2. Historic flood risk 38 5.3. Present day flood risk 46 5.4. Flood defences 57 5.5. Climate change 59 6. Managing Flood Risk in the Slough Borough 62 6.1. Recommendations for locating future development in the Slough Borough 62 6.2. Flood Alleviation Schemes 64 6.3. Emergency Planning 64 6.4. Flood warning and evacuation plans 65 6.5. Flood warnings 65 7. Site specific flood risk assessments 68 7.1. When is a site specific FRA required? 68 7.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Common Ground in Relation to the HSPG Joint Spatial Planning Framework
    Draft HSPG SoCG for the JSPF 2020.02.14v1.4 February 2020 Statement of Common Ground in relation to the HSPG Joint Spatial Planning Framework February 2020 1 Classification - Public Draft HSPG SoCG for the JSPF 2020.02.14v1.4 February 2020 List of Contents 1. Introduction, scope and purpose 2. List of the parties 3. The HSPG 4. Signatories 5. Strategic geography 6. Strategic matters 7. Specific joint interests and comments of the signatories 8. Other key stakeholders – comments 9. Governance arrangements 10. Timetable for review and ongoing cooperation 11. Endnotes and references Draft Circulation Date PAS template Prepared by MT – initial draft version 1.0 Core Team and Spatial Planning Sub Group 3/11/2019 Prepared by MT – version 2.0 Revised with trk chg showing – re-circulated 3/12/2019 Prepared by MT – version 1.3 Revised reflecting revised JSPF and responses (Simple Track Changes) 7/2/2020 Prepared by MT- version 1.4 trk chg ver Revised after member responses – circulate to HSPG officers 14/2/2020 Prepared by MT – version 1.4 clean ver Revised after member responses – circulate to Leaders Board 14/2/2020 2 Classification - Public Draft HSPG SoCG for the JSPF 2020.02.14v1.4 February 2020 1. Introduction, scope and Purpose This Statement of Common Ground (SoCG) supports the Joint Spatial Planning Framework (JSPF) and related policies and guidance being taken forward by the Heathrow Strategic Planning Group (HSPG). This SoCG sets out the scope of its work to support these, including co-sponsorship of the Joint Evidence Base and Infrastructure Study (JEBIS) and other related evidence prepared jointly by or for the signatories and/or by the HSPG, working with partners and promoters including Heathrow Airport Limited (HAL).
    [Show full text]
  • South East Aggregates Monitoring Report 2012
    South East Aggregates Monitoring Report 2012 South East England Aggregates Working Party SEEAWP 13/10 November 2013 Aggregates Monitoring 2012 South East England SEEAWP 13/10 CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 1. Scope of this report................................................................................................ 4 2. Minerals Strategy, Aggregate Guidelines and Apportionment ............................ 4 3. Quarries .................................................................................................................. 5 Land-won Sand and Gravel ........................................................................... 5 Local Crushed Rock ...................................................................................... 6 4. Wharves .................................................................................................................. 7 Landings of Marine-Dredged Sand and Gravel ............................................. 7 Imports of Crushed Rock by Sea ................................................................... 7 5. Rail Depots ............................................................................................................. 8 Crushed Rock and Sand and Gravel ............................................................. 8 6. Consumption of Primary Aggregates ................................................................... 8 7. Secondary and Recycled Material ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Risk Assessment
    Poyle Quarry Western Extension Land West of Colne Brook, Foundry Lane, Horton, Slough Environmental Risk Assessment On behalf of Summerleaze Ltd Project Ref: 35678/3505 | Rev: 01 | Date: October 2019 Registered Office: Buckingham Court Kingsmead Business Park, London Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, HP11 1JU Office Address: Caversham Bridge House, Waterman Place, Reading, Berkshire RG1 8DN T: +44 (0)118 950 0761 E: [email protected] Environmental Risk Assessment Poyle Quarry Western Extension Document Control Sheet Project Name: Poyle Quarry Western Extension Project Ref: 35678/3505 Report Title: Environmental Risk Assessment Doc Ref: 35678/EP/R4 Date: October 2019 Name Position Signature Date Prepared by: Nicholas Hills Engineer NH 16/10/2019 Reviewed by: Kate Riley Associate KR 16/10/2019 Approved by: Paul Jeffery Director PJ 16/10/2019 For and on behalf of Peter Brett Associates LLP Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Approved Rev01 10/19 Issue NH VKR PJ This report has been prepared by Peter Brett Associates LLP (‘PBA’) on behalf of its client to whom this report is addressed (‘Client’) in connection with the project described in this report and takes into account the Client's particular instructions and requirements. This report was prepared in accordance with the professional services appointment under which PBA was appointed by its Client. This report is not intended for and should not be relied on by any third party (i.e. parties other than the Client). PBA accepts no duty or responsibility (including in negligence) to any party other than the Client and disclaims all liability of any nature whatsoever to any such party in respect of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Series Map (A4)
    Britwell Doddsfield Britwell Way shops S E Monksfield Lower Wentworth Britwell Way M Burnham Drive Road A Long H Long Readings T Garibaldi Furlong Taplow Lane 78 Boulters (eve/Sun only) Drive R Lock E Taplow Burnham Northern V Saint Cloud Maidenhead I Road Essex Station Station Manor Way R Avenue Frascati Park Bath Slough Way Road Trading Estate Farnham Bridge Bridge St Andrew’s Dover Road Broadway Road Avenue Maidenhead Way Road Bridge Sainsbury’s The Centre Maidenhead Brunel’s Station Bridge St Andrew’s Way Three Slough Bath Slough Station Road Tuns Bath Mercian Cippenham Road Bus Station Way Slough Langley Wellington Salt Hill Street Station Town Hall Premier Inn Langley Langley 76 Harrow Road 75 Langley High High Street Trelawney Street Parlaunt Road Avenue Windsor Sussex Road Travelodge Place Herchel Datchet Street Road 61 78 Tamar Sutton Lane Chalvey Way McDonalds Common The Road 71 Myrke 77 London Axis 77 High Colenorton Boveney Road Travelodge Park Crescent New Road Street Slough 60 Eton Wick Road Road Brands Eton 61 Eton 60 Slough/Windsor Hill 61 College Slough 61 Marriot Hotel Wick Eton Road Colnbrook High By-Pass Street Quality Brocus Hotel Aurora Holiday Inn Street Majors Farm 75 Colnbrook 76 Hotel Hotel Road 77 By-Pass Bath R Windsor 78 IVER Footbridge Road THAMES Racecourse Windsor & Datchet Windsor & Green Compass Eton Central Eton Riverside Ditton Colnbrook Aston Aurora Park Centre Mead Station Road Hanover Arthur 61 Hotel Gallys Old Old Bath Smith’s Way Datchet Road High Castle Station Road Road Lane Peascod Horton Street
    [Show full text]