DOCSLIB.ORG

A Foucauldian Analysis of the Discourses Which Produce Women Abusing Women in the Workplace

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Foucauldian Analysis of the Discourses Which Produce Women Abusing Women in the Workplace THE WEAVER AND THE WEB: A FOUCAULDIAN ANALYSIS OF THE DISCOURSES WHICH PRODUCE WOMEN ABUSING WOMEN IN THE WORKPLACE A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education University of Regina By Wendy Cheryl Shaw Regina, Saskatchewan December, 2012 Copyright 2012: W.C. Shaw UNIVERSITY OF REGINA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH SUPERVISORY AND EXAMINING COMMITTEE Wendy Cheryl Shaw, candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education, has presented a thesis titled, The Weaver and The Web: A Foucauldian Analysis of the Discourses Which Produce Women Abusing Women in the Workplace, in an oral examination held on December 4, 2012. The following committee members have found the thesis acceptable in form and content, and that the candidate demonstrated satisfactory knowledge of the subject material. External Examiner: Dr. Gerald Walton, Lakehead University Supervisor: Dr. Meredith Cherland, Adjunct Committee Member: Dr. Paul Hart, Curriculum & Instruction Committee Member: Dr. Carol Schick, Curriculum & Instruction Committee Member: Dr. Darlene Juschka, Women’s and Gender Studies Chair of Defense: Dr. Dongyan Blachford, Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research ABSTRACT Bullying of women by other women in the workplace has rarely been the focus of research. This dissertation uses feminist poststructural theory and Foucauldian discourse analysis to problematize the belief that workplace bullying is the result of individual personality flaws, skill deficits, or psychopathology in the abuser or in the target, and to trouble the individualization of a serious social problem which has resulted in victim blaming, and turning the focus of public attention away from the consequences of gender and race. This dissertation analyzes research texts based on transcriptions of open interviews with five women who have experienced abuse by other women in the workplace, in order to illuminate the cultural discourses and humanist discursive practices that shape the women’s constructions of self and others, and their assumptions about the world. It uses discourse analysis to explain the role of discourse in the production of workplace hierarchy, gender and race; to show the construction of the subject positions made available to women; and to explore the complex configurations of power/knowledge facing women in the workplace. “Woman” is not a natural or an essentialist category. Woman is constituted in discourse. Using concepts from the work of Michel Foucault (biopower, surveillance, power/knowledge, and desire), this dissertation suggests that discourses of the good woman and the good worker offer women subject positions that are both desirable and painful, marked on the body, subject positions that sometimes conflict with each other and become impossible to reconcile. Disrupting the discourses that produce workplace bullying is complex and difficult work, because a woman’s culturally constructed desires i may keep her from resisting the “common sense” of the gendered discourses that surround her, and because she may accept and submit to discursive assumptions in order to survive. Poststructural theory, because it troubles the common sense of a vast research literature that presents bullying as individual pathology, and because it disrupts gender and racial binaries that allow for misogyny and racism, offers a new perspective on workplace bullying that can be used to help generate possibilities for change. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writing of a dissertation can be a lonely and isolating experience, yet it would be impossible without the support of many others. I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge and thank those who have contributed. To my participants who gave of their time and shared painful memories, I would like to express my deepest appreciation. I hope I have provided you with a chance to be heard. I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Meredith Cherland, my advisor, for hours of proof reading multiple versions of this dissertation, for providing many stylistic suggestions and substantive challenges to help me improve my presentation and clarify my arguments. Thank you for the many hours of stimulating conversation when no one else knew what I was talking about, for sharing your knowledge and expertise, and for your patience and gentle way of directing and supporting. Not only were you readily available to me, you always read and responded to the drafts of each chapter of my work more quickly than I could have hoped. Without your guidance and assistance this dissertation would not have been possible. To the members of my committee, Dr. Carol Schick, who first introduced me to Michel Foucault, Dr. Darlene Juschka, and Dr. Paul Hart, thank you for your generous contributions to this dissertation. Your time, knowledge, expertise, guidance, careful reading of several drafts, helpful suggestions and motivating words were welcomed and deeply appreciated. iii DEDICATION I am grateful to my friends for always supporting me and encouraging me with your best wishes. I would never have been able to finish my dissertation without the support of my family and husband, Patrick Shaw. You were always there and stood by me through the good times and bad. Thank you for your years of support and understanding of the time away from you it took to attend classes and complete the several degrees that brought me to this place. Finally, it is to my daughters, Meghan, Erinn and Shannon, that I wish to dedicate this research with the hope for a different future for you and young women like you. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT . i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . iii DEDICATION . iv LIST OF APPENDICES . viii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION . 1 1.1 Introduction . 1 1.2 Bullying in Schools . 2 1.2.1 Early research . 2 1.2.2 Prevalence . 4 1.2.3 Effects and consequences . 6 1.2.4 Casual factors . 9 1.2.5 Prevention and intervention strategies . 13 1.2.6 Gender differences . 22 1.3 Bullying, Mobbing, Abuse and Violence in the Workplace . 24 1.3.1 Early research . 25 1.3.2 Definitions and categories of specific behaviours and circumstances . 28 1.3.3. Prevalence . 30 1.3.4. Effects . 31 1.3.5 Casual factors . 33 1.3.6 Prevention and intervention strategies . 35 1.3.7 Gender differences . 37 1.4 Women and Bullying in the Workplace . 40 1.4.1 Scientific theory . 40 1.4.2 Liberal feminist theory . 41 1.4.3 Grounded theory . 50 1.4.4 Structuralism . 52 1.4.5 Poststructural theory . 53 1.4.6 Habermas and critical theory . 54 1.5 Introducing a Different Perspective . 55 1.6 Summary . 58 CHAPTER TWO: THEORETICAL FRAMES . 59 2.1 Introduction . 59 2.2 A Poststructural Framework . 61 2.2.1 Discourse and discursive practices . 63 2.2.2 Subjectivity and subject positioning . 66 2.2.3 Tropes and storylines through which gendered persons are constructed . 73 2.2.4 Binary oppositions . 75 v 2.2.5 Language . 76 2.2.6 The metaphors of everyday life . 81 2.2.7 Reflections on power and knowledge . 83 2.3 A Feminist Perspective . 93 2.3.1 Feminist research . 93 2.3.2 Troubling the public/private binary . 97 2.3.3 Empowerment . 98 2.4 Feminist Poststructural Theory . 100 2.5 Racism in the Workplace . 108 2.6 Summary . 111 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY AND METHODS . 112 3.1 Introduction . 112 3.2 Other Views of Research . 112 3.2.1 Humanism . 112 3.2.2 Positivism . 113 3.2.3 Quantitative or qualitative approaches . 114 3.3 My View of Research . 117 3.3.1 Objectivity and neutrality . 117 3.3.2 The truth . 118 3.3.3 Feminist perspective . 119 3.4 Discourse Analysis . 120 3.4.1 Varieties of discourse analysis . 129 3.4.2 Poststructural discourse analysis . 130 3.5 Method . 133 3.6 Interviews . 134 3.6.1 Follow-up interviews . 136 3.6.2 Why I did not use an interview survey . 136 3.6.3 Using an interview schedule . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cross Disciplinary Issues in Workplace Bullying
    Answering workplace bullying’s key questions 1 Answering Five Key Questions about Workplace Bullying: How Communication Scholarship Provides Thought Leadership for Transforming Abuse at Work Pamela Lutgen-Sandvik (Ph.D., Arizona State University) is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication & Journalism at the University of New Mexico, USA. She researches destructive communication in organizations and the communicative processes associated with positive organizing. Email: [email protected] Telephone: 505-331-4724 Fax: 505-277-2068 Mailing: Department of Communication & Journalism University of New Mexico MSC03 2240; 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 Sarah H. Tracy (Ph.D., University of Colorado, Boulder) is an Associate Professor and Director of The Project for Wellness and Work-Life in the Hugh Downs School of Human Communication at Arizona State University, USA. She studies emotion and work-life wellness. Email: [email protected] Telephone: 480-965-7709 FAX: 480-965-4291 Mailing: Hugh Downs School of Human Communication Arizona State University PO Box 871205 Tempe, AZ 87287-1205 Management Communication Quarterly Answering workplace bullying’s key questions 2 Abstract: Organizational communication research is vital for understanding and addressing workplace bullying, a problem that affects nearly half of working adults and has devastating results on employee well-being and organizational productivity. A communication approach illustrates the toxic complexity of workplace bullying, as it is condoned through societal discourses, sustained by receptive workplace cultures, and perpetuated through local interactions. Examining these (macro, meso, and micro) communicative elements addresses the most pressing questions about workplace bullying including: 1) how abuse manifests, 2) how employees respond, 3) why it is so harmful, 4) why resolution is so difficult, and 5) how it might be resolved.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Hate Crime Legislation
    A Comparative Analysis of Hate Crime Legislation A Report to the Hate Crime Legislation Review James Chalmers and Fiona Leverick University of Glasgow, July 2017 i A Comparative Analysis of Hate Crime Legislation: A Report to the Hate Crime Legislation Review July 2017 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________ 1 1. WHAT IS HATE CRIME? ________________________________________ 4 2. HATE CRIME LEGISLATION IN SCOTLAND __________________________ 7 3. JUSTIFICATIONS FOR PUNISHING HATE CRIME MORE SEVERELY ______ 23 4. MODELS OF HATE CRIME LEGISLATION __________________________ 40 5. CHOICE OF PROTECTED CHARACTERISTICS _______________________ 52 6. HATE SPEECH AND STIRRING UP OFFENCES _______________________ 68 7. HATE CRIME LEGISLATION IN SELECTED JURISDICTIONS _____________ 89 8. APPROACHES TAKEN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS RELEVANT TO THE OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOUR AT FOOTBALL AND THREATENING COMMUNICATIONS (SCOTLAND) ACT 2012 ____________________________________________________ 134 ii INTRODUCTION In January 2017, the Scottish Government announced a review of hate crime legislation, chaired by Lord Bracadale.1 Lord Bracadale requested that, to assist the Review it its task, we produce a comparative report detailing principles underpinning hate crime legislation and approaches taken to hate crime in a range of jurisdictions. Work on this report commenced in late March 2017 and the final report was submitted to the Review in July 2017. Chapter 1 (What is Hate Crime?) explores what is meant by the term “hate crime”, noting that different definitions may properly be used for different purposes. It notes that the legislative response to hate crime can be characterised by the definition offered by Chakraborti and Garland: the creation of offences, or sentencing provisions, “which adhere to the principle that crimes motivated by hatred or prejudice towards particular features of the victim’s identity should be treated differently from ‘ordinary’ crimes”.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying Prevention Lending Library
    BULLYING PREVENTION LENDING LIBRARY Educator Resources Adina's Deck. Award winning DVD series about the fictional detective club, "Adina's Deck" a group of friends who help solve challenges current to today's young people. Grades 4 – 8. Bully-Book. An electronic book with follow-up questions. Grades K – 3. Bully Busters. Arthur M. Horne, Christi L. Bartolomucci and Dawn Newman-Carlson. Teaching manual for helping bullies, victims and bystanders. Grades K – 5. The Bully Free Classroom by Allan L. Beane, PhD. Grades K – 8. Bully Free Lesson Plans by Allen L. Beane, PhD, Linda Beane and Pam Matlock, MA. Grades K – 8. Bully Proof. Developed by Nan Stein, Emily Gaberman and Lisa Sjostrum. A teacher’s guide on teasing and bullying for use in grades 4 – 5. Bully Safe Schools. DVD Bullying Hurts Everyone. DVD. Bullying K – 5: Introductory Videos for Elementary School Students, Teachers, and Parents from the authors of Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. DVD. Bullying 6 – 8: Introductory Videos for Middle School Students, Teachers, and Parents from the authors of Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. DVD. Bullying: Prevention and Intervention for School Staff. Channing Bete. DVD. Class Meetings That Matter from Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. Grades K – 5 & 6 – 8. Cyber Bullying: A Prevention Curriculum by Susan P. Limber, Ph.D., Robin M. Kowalski, Ph.D., and Patricia W. Agatston, Ph.D. Grades 3 – 5 and 6 – 12. Cyberbullying—Safe to Learn: Embedding nti-bullying work in schools from the Pennsylvania Department for Children, Schools and Families. Deanna’s Fund Bullying Prevention Kit. Kit includes a DVD with segments of the theatrical production Doin’ the Right Thing, teacher’s guide and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Framing and Exploring Online Suicidal Games As a Specific Form of Cyberbullying
    Re-framing and exploring online suicidal games as a specific form of cyberbullying Downloaded from: https://research.chalmers.se, 2021-09-27 23:53 UTC Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Thodelius, C. (2020) Re-framing and exploring online suicidal games as a specific form of cyberbullying International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9: 231-240 http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.21 N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. research.chalmers.se offers the possibility of retrieving research publications produced at Chalmers University of Technology. It covers all kind of research output: articles, dissertations, conference papers, reports etc. since 2004. research.chalmers.se is administrated and maintained by Chalmers Library (article starts on next page) International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 2020, 9, 231-240 231 Re-Framing and Exploring Online Suicidal Games as a Specific Form of Cyberbullying Charlotta Thodelius* Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden Abstract: This article discusses online suicide games as a part of cyberbullying with the game called “Blue Whale Challenge” as an empirical case. The three-fold aim is to (i) identify key social mechanisms related to participation and engagement, (ii) discuss the phenomena in a broader sociological and criminological framework, and (iii) compare social mechanisms in BWC with mechanisms in cyberbullying. The analysis was conducted in two steps, firstly a case study based on a combination of media reports and extracts from different social media posts related to BWC was conducted. Secondly, the result from the case study was re-analyzed in relation to key elements identified in cyberbullying, to conclude if and how BWC can be defined as a form of cyberbullying.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyberbullies on Campus, 37 U. Tol. L. Rev. 51 (2005)
    UIC School of Law UIC Law Open Access Repository UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship 2005 Cyberbullies on Campus, 37 U. Tol. L. Rev. 51 (2005) Darby Dickerson John Marshall Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/facpubs Part of the Education Law Commons, Legal Education Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Darby Dickerson, Cyberbullies on Campus, 37 U. Tol. L. Rev. 51 (2005) https://repository.law.uic.edu/facpubs/643 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CYBERBULLIES ON CAMPUS Darby Dickerson * I. INTRODUCTION A new challenge facing educators is how to deal with the high-tech incivility that has crept onto our campuses. Technology has changed the way students approach learning, and has spawned new forms of rudeness. Students play computer games, check e-mail, watch DVDs, and participate in chat rooms during class. They answer ringing cell phones and dare to carry on conversations mid-lesson. Dealing with these types of incivilities is difficult enough, but another, more sinister e-culprit-the cyberbully-has also arrived on law school campuses. Cyberbullies exploit technology to control and intimidate others on campus.' They use web sites, blogs, and IMs2 to malign professors and classmates.3 They craft e-mails that are offensive, boorish, and cruel. They blast professors and administrators for grades given and policies passed; and, more often than not, they mix in hateful attacks on our character, motivations, physical attributes, and intellectual abilities.4 They disrupt classes, cause tension on campus, and interfere with our educational mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Harassment and Victimisation Introduction
    Harassment and victimisation Introduction Stockholm University is to be characterised by its excellent environment for work and study. All employees and students shall be treated equally and with respect. At Stockholm University we shall jointly safeguard our work and study environment. A good environment enables creative development and excellent outcomes for work and study. At Stockholm University, victimisation, harassment associated with discrimination on any grounds and sexual harassment are unacceptable and must not take place. Victimisation, harassment and sexual harassment all jeopardise the affected person's job satisfaction and chances of success in work or study. As soon as the university becomes aware that someone has been affected, action will be taken immediately. In this brochure, Stockholm University explains • the forms that victimisation, harassment and sexual harassment may take, • what you can do if you or someone else becomes subjected to such behaviour, • the university's responsibilities, • the sanctions faced by those subjecting a person to victimisation, harassment or sexual harassment. Astrid Söderbergh Widding Vice-Chancellor Production: Human Resources Office, Student Services, Council for Equal Opportunities and Equality, and Matador kommunikation. Illustrations: Jan Ed. Printing: Ark-Tryckaren, 2015. 3 What is victimisation? All organisations experience occasional differences of opinion, conflicts and difficulties in working together. However, these occasional conflicts are not considered victimisation or bullying. Victimisation is defined as recurrent reprehensible or negative actions directed against individuals and that may lead to the person experiencing it being marginalised. Examples include deliberate insults, demeaning treatment, ostracism, withholding of information, persecution or threats. Victimisation brings with it the risk that individuals as well as entire groups will be adversely affected, in both the short and long terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobbing in the Context of a Woman's Life
    #24 2014 ISSN 1715-0094 Morrison Kenney, R. (2014). Mobbing in the Context of a Woman’s Life. Workplace, 24, 42-51. RACHEL MORRISON KENNEY MOBBING IN THE CONTEXT OF A WOMAN’S LIFE1 Trauma in Middle Age My conversations with Gertraud took place in 2009, in the peaceful, refined, so very civilized setting of her apartment in one of the tonier high-rise condos in Waterloo, Ontario. I had just moved into an apartment of my own, where I could scarcely see the floor for all the cardboard boxes still unpacked. This impeccably ordered display of European taste was in sharpest contrast to the half-assembled furnishings from big-box stores strewn about my dwelling. Nothing here hinted at the pain and loss that had marked this ninety-year-old woman’s life, much less the nadir in 1976, that I had come to talk to her about. Nor did her personal appearance. Petite, gracious, with honey-coloured hair and the kind of eyes that smile on their own, she wore a blouse with nary a wrinkle, and over it a delicate brooch. She was a picture of what used to be called “good breeding.” That first day, and all the other times we met, Gertraud carried herself with grace and no inkling of self- pity. Her manners, so I was to learn, were a clue to her deep appreciation for the preciousness of life. In counterpoint to the staggering sorrows she had known were even greater joys, moments when she witnessed the power of compassion in the midst of strife.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Bullying?
    What Is Bullying? Here are some definitions, according to the experts... “I define bullying or victimization in the following general way: A student is being bullied or victimized when he or she is ex- posed, repeatedly and over time, to negative actions on the part of one or more other students.” —Dan Olweus, Bullying at School (Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993), p. 9. “Bullying among children is commonly defined as intentional, repeated hurtful acts, words, or other behavior, such as name- calling, threatening and/or shunning committed by one or more children against another. These negative acts are not intention- ally provoked by the victims, and for such acts to be defined as bullying, an imbalance in real or perceived power must exist between the bully and the victim. Bullying may be physical, verbal, emotional or sexual in nature.” —“Preventing Bullying: A Manual for Schools and Communities,” U.S. Department of Education: p. 1. Bullying has these characteristics... 1. ”Intent to harm—the perpetrator finds pleasure in the taunting and continues even when the victim’s distress is obvious. 2. Intensity and duration—the teasing continues over a long period of time and the degree of taunting is damaging to the self-esteem of the victim. 3. Power of the abuser—the abuser maintains power because of age, strength, size, and/or gender. 4. Vulnerability of the victim—the victim is more sensitive to teasing, cannot adequately defend him or herself, and has physical or psychological qualities that make him or her more prone to vulnerability. 5. Lack of support—the victim feels isolated and exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Brainwashing As a Strategy for Building Uniformity Reflected in Lois Lowry’S the Giver Novel (1993) Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
    BRAINWASHING AS A STRATEGY FOR BUILDING UNIFORMITY REFLECTED IN LOIS LOWRY’S THE GIVER NOVEL (1993) MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA PUBLICATION ARTICLE Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education in English Department By: NUR HANDINI YUSNA LAILY A320120130 ENGLISH DEPARTMENT SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA 2016 0 BRAINWASHING AS A SRATEGY FOR BUILDING UNIFORMITY REFLECTED IN LOIS LOWRY’S NOVEL THE GIVER (1993) MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA Nur Handini Yusna Laily . A320120130 ABSTRAK BRAINWASHING AS A SRATEGY FOR BUILDING UNIFORMITY REFLECTED IN LOIS LOWRY’S NOVEL THE GIVER (1993) MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA Nur Handini Yusna Laily . A320120130 ABSTRAK Penelitian ini menganalisis tentang The Influence of Brainwashing as a Strategy for Building Uniformity The Giver (1993) yang dianalisis dengan menggunakan pendekatan sosiologi. Objektif dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui karakteristik dari brainwashing, untuk mendeskripsikan proses brainwashing dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana Louis Lowry menerapkan brainwashing berdasarkan pendekatan sosiologi. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Data pada primer penelitian ini adalah The Giver by Lois Lowry’s (1993), dan data sekundernya adalah sumber lain yang berhubungan dengan penelitian yang diambil dari buku sastra, kritik sastra, jurnal, dan beberapa artikel yang berhubungan dengan novel. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pertama, terdapat karakterisitik brainwashing dalam novel The Giver yaitu metode reward dan punishment, obat-obatan dan senyawa lainnnya, pendekatan dalam pidato atau presentasi dan pendekatan secara audio (vocal) dan visual. Dalam pemberian reward dan punishment seperti pemberian pekerjaan pada masing-masing anggota dan juga pemberian aturan dalam komunitas. Sedangkan obat-obatan diberikan kepada komunitas setiap hari.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of School-Based Programs to Reduce Bullying: a Systematic and Meta-Analytic Review
    J Exp Criminol (2011) 7:27–56 DOI 10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1 Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review Maria M. Ttofi & David P. Farrington Published online: 16 September 2010 # Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract This article presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of anti-bullying programs in schools. Studies were included if they evaluated the effects of an anti-bullying program by comparing an intervention group who received the program with a control group who did not. Four types of research design were included: a) randomized experiments, b) intervention-control comparisons with before-and-after measures of bullying, c) other intervention- control comparisons, and d) age-cohort designs. Both published and unpublished reports were included. All volumes of 35 journals from 1983 up to the end of May 2009 were hand-searched, as were 18 electronic databases. Reports in languages other than English were also included. A total of 622 reports concerned with bullying prevention were found, and 89 of these reports (describing 53 different program evaluations) were included in our review. Of the 53 different program evaluations, 44 provided data that permitted the calculation of an effect size for bullying or victimization. The meta-analysis of these 44 evaluations showed that, overall, school-based anti-bullying programs are effective: on average, bullying decreased by 20–23% and victimization decreased by 17–20%. Program elements and intervention components that were associated with a decrease in bullying and victimization were identified, based on feedback from researchers about the coding of 40 out of 44 programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying, School Exclusion and Literacy
    Bullying, School Exclusion And Literacy Canadian Public Health Association May 16, 2003 Funded by Human Resources Development Canada National Literacy Secretariat. Discussion Paper Bullying, School Exclusion and Literacy CPHA Discussion Paper Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 7 What is Bullying? 7 What is Literacy? 7 What is School Engagement/Exclusion? 9 The Bullying – School Exclusion – Literacy Link 9 A Social Ecological Perspective 11 Figure 1: Social Ecological Model of Bullying, School Exclusion and Literacy 12 2. Experiences of Bullying in Canadian Children 13 How Much Bullying and Victimization is there? 13 Who is Involved? Victims, Bullies and Victim-Bullies 14 Risk Factors 16 Figure 2: Schools as Communities Perspective 23 Consequences of Bullying and Victimization 24 3. Literacy Skills of Canadian Youth 26 How Do Canadian Students Perform on Literacy Tests? 26 Literacy Risk Factors 26 Teaching for Multiple Literacies and Intelligences 27 Figure 3: Learning Pathways and School Experience 28 4. School Exclusion and Canadian Children and Youth 29 How many Suspensions and Expulsions are there? 29 How Many Students Drop Out? 29 Risk Factors 30 5. Next Steps 31 6. Appendix A: NLSCY Bullying Data 33 Table 1: NLSCY Cycle 3 Bullying Behaviour by Age of Children 33 Table 2: NLSCY Cycle 3 Bullying Behaviour by PMK’s Highest Level of Schooling Obtained and Gender of Child 34 Table 3: NLSCY Cycle 3 Comparisons of Mean Reading and Math Scores by Gender of Child and Bullying Behaviour 35 Appendix B: Multiple Intelligences Description 36 7. Sources 37 8. End Notes 46 2 Bullying, School Exclusion and Literacy CPHA Discussion Paper Acknowledgements Canadian Public Health Association would like to express its appreciation to the authors, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Shadow of the Law: the Silence of Workplace Abuse
    IN THE SHADOW OF THE LAW: THE SILENCE OF WORKPLACE ABUSE PhD Candidate: Ms Allison Jean Ballard Supervisors: Professor Patricia Easteal, AM Assistant Professor Bruce Baer Arnold Month and Year of Submission: January 2019 Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Law (941AA) The University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia Acknowledgements Somewhat uncommonly perhaps, I have been fortunate to have had the same two supervisors throughout my PhD journey. It has been a privilege and a huge pleasure to be guided by, and to learn from my primary supervisor (now Emeritus) Professor Patricia Easteal AM and my secondary supervisor, Assistant Professor Bruce Baer Arnold. Patricia in particular has been my rock. Without Patricia’s amazing kindness, guidance, encouragement, and friendship, I would have ‘thrown in the towel’ and left the PhD boxing ring long ago. Without her support, my well-developed ability to procrastinate (God, help me to finish everything I sta….)1 and to be distracted (God, help me to keep my mind on th– … Look a bird – ing at a time)2 would have reigned supreme. So, my immeasurable thanks to the extraordinary Patricia. Bruce, ever pragmatic and focused on the end game, reminded me to stay focused, helping me to tow the academic line, not take off on too many ‘flights of fancy’, and to check my footnotes! It has been a rollercoaster journey that has spanned three different careers across six different sectors. During this time, I have also started a pro bono virtual legal practice, and established, with my dear friend, and fellow academic, traveller, and shoe-shopper, Doris Bozin, one of the first university-based health-justice legal advice clinics.
    [Show full text]