DOCSLIB.ORG

Landscape and Visual Appraisal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LAND AT PATTERSON ROAD, WELLINGBOROUGH, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE Planning Application for Proposed Multi- Silo Development Landscape and Visual Appraisal July 2020 Land at Patterson Road, Wellingborough, N’shire Planning Application for Proposed Multi-Silo Development Landscape and Visual Appraisal (LVA) Notice This report was produced by DB Landscape Consultancy Ltd. (DBLC) for Veka (referred to as the ‘applicant’ hereafter) for the specific purpose of accompanying a Planning Application for the construction of loading silos and related infrastructure at an existing site on Patterson Road, Wellingborough Industrial Estate, Wellingborough. This report may not be used by any person other than the applicant without express permission. In any event, DBLC accepts no liability for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of the use of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person other than the applicant. Document Control Version Date Author Checked by Change Description Draft ver. 1 27/04/20 D. Brittain (DBLC Ltd) T. Slater (3D Planning Draft version issued for Ltd) comment Issue 07/07/20 D. Brittain (DBLC Ltd) T. Slater (3D Planning Final version issued Version Ltd) Contact Details: David Brittain DB Landscape Consultancy Ltd. tel: 01344 624 709 mob: 07736 083 383 email: [email protected] web: www.dblc.co.uk DB/Issue version 07/07/2020 Land at Patterson Road, Wellingborough, N’shire Planning Application for Proposed Multi-Silo Development Landscape and Visual Appraisal (LVA) Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL BASELINE ......................................................................................................... 6 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Description of the Site and Immediate Surrounds ................................................................................. 6 Description of the Wider Surrounding Area ........................................................................................... 7 Existing Landscape Character Assessments ........................................................................................... 9 VISUAL BASELINE ................................................................................................................................. 13 3 PLANNING CONTEXT .............................................................................................................................. 16 Landscape Designations and Policies ................................................................................................... 16 National Level Landscape Policies and Guidance ................................................................................. 17 Local Level Landscape Policies and Guidance ...................................................................................... 18 4 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND MITIGATION ............................................................ 20 Summary of Proposed Development ................................................................................................... 20 5 SUMMARY OF KEY LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL EFFECTS ........................................................................... 22 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 22 6 ACCORDANCE WITH LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENTS, PLANNING POLICY AND GUIDELINES ..... 31 APPENDICES Appendix A Figures…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………33 DB/Issue version 07/07/2020 Land at Patterson Road, Wellingborough, N’shire Planning Application for Proposed Multi-Silo Development Landscape and Visual Appraisal (LVA) 1 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY Introduction 1.1. DB Landscape Consultancy Ltd. (DBLC) was appointed by the applicant to undertake a Landscape and Visual Appraisal (LVA) report relating to proposals (hereafter referred to as the Proposed Development) to construct eight new loading silos (30m high), four new pellet silos (20m high) and a new 4.6m high (highest ridge), 588m2 storage building at the Veka Waste Recycling facility along Patterson Road, Wellingborough Industrial Estate, Wellingborough. 1.2 The Veka controlled land within which the silo construction works would be located is referred to as the ‘Site’. The application boundary of the Site extends over an area of approximately 2.6 hectares (ha) as indicated on Figure 1: Zone of Theoretical Visibility and Viewpoint Location Plan. The approximate six figure grid reference for the centre of the Site is E: 490017, N: 270074. Methodology 1.3 Whilst this is not a full Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) this LVA examines the Level of Key Effects likely to arise from the Proposed Development on local landscape and visual receptors in a manner similar to a full LVIA. 1.4 Where necessary, the appraisal has been prepared with reference to relevant professional standards, published guidance and methodology provided by the following; Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’, 3rd Edition 2013 (Landscape Institute and the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment); National Character Area 89: Northamptonshire Vales. (Natural England); and Local Landscape Character Types (LCT): ‘Urban’ (Site itself) and LCT 17: River Valley Floodplain (in close proximity), as defined within the ‘Current Landscape Character Assessment’ (Northamptonshire County Council, 2003) 1.5 The LVA considers the landscape character of the Site and wider surrounds together with the location of the Site in terms of existing visibility from surrounding visual receptors including residential properties, Public Rights of Way (PRoW) and roads. 1.6 The structure of this LVA report has been split into the following sections: Introduction and Methodology DB/Issue Version 4 07/07/2020 Land at Patterson Road, Wellingborough, N’shire Planning Application for Proposed Multi-Silo Development Landscape and Visual Appraisal (LVA) Landscape and Visual Baseline, including existing Landscape Character Assessments (Section 2); Planning Context: Landscape Policies and Designations (Section 3); Description of Proposed Development and Mitigation (Section 4); Appraisal of the Level of Key Landscape and Visual Effects (Section 5); Accordance with Landscape Character Assessments, Planning Policy and Guidelines (Section 6); and Appendix A: Figures (Figures 1 to 18). 1.7 The following definitions are used for the description of the Level of Key Effects on the baseline landscape and visual conditions arising from the Proposed Development. Table 7.1: Landscape and Visual Significance of Effects Definitions Level of Key Effects Key Landscape Effects Key Visual Effects Major Beneficial Alterations that result in a Alteration to the composition of the considerable and distinct view which is considered to result in improvement of the existing a considerable improvement in the landscape character and existing view features Moderate Beneficial Alterations that result in an Alteration to the composition of the evident improvement of the view which is considered to result in existing landscape character an evident improvement in the and features existing view Minor Beneficial Alterations that result in a Alteration to the composition of the slight improvement of the view which is considered to result in existing landscape character a slight improvement in the existing and features view Negligible Beneficial Alterations that result in a Alteration to the composition of the very slight improvement to view which is considered to result in the existing landscape a very slight improvement in the character and features existing view Neutral No alteration to the existing No alteration to the existing view landscape baseline Negligible Adverse Alterations that result in a Alteration to the composition of the very slight deterioration to view which is considered to result in the existing landscape a very slight deterioration in the character and features existing view Minor Adverse Alterations that result in a Alteration to the composition of the slight deterioration of the view which is considered to result in existing landscape character a slight deterioration in the existing and features view Moderate Adverse Alterations that result in an Alteration to the composition of the evident deterioration of the view which is considered to result in existing landscape character an evident deterioration in the and features existing view Major Adverse Alterations that result in a Alteration to the composition of the considerable and distinct view which is considered to result in deterioration of the existing a considerable deterioration in the landscape character and existing view features DB/Issue Version 5 07/07/2020 Land at Patterson Road, Wellingborough, N’shire Planning Application for Proposed Multi-Silo Development Landscape and Visual Appraisal (LVA) 2 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL BASELINE Introduction 2.1 The landscape and visual baseline represents a study of the
Recommended publications
  • West Northamptonshire Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Part 1 Northamptonshire County Council March 2019

    West Northamptonshire Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Part 1 Northamptonshire County Council March 2019

    West Northamptonshire Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Part 1 Northamptonshire County Council March 2019 REVISION SCHEDULE West Northamptonshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. Revision Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by st 01 31 July Draft SFRA Josie Bateman Phil Jones Alison Parry 2017 Level 1 th 02 5 Interim Draft Josie Bateman Aiden Grist Alison Parry October SFRA Level 1 2017 th 03 14 Final Draft Josie Bateman Aiden Grist Alison Parry November SFRA Level 1 2017 th 04 5 Final SFRA Josie Bateman Aiden Grist Alison Parry December Level 1 SFRA 2017 th 05 19 March Updated Aiden Grist Phil Jones Alison Parry 2019 Groundwater Mapping Northamptonshire County Council Place Directorate Flood and water Management One Angel Square 4 Angel Street Northampton NN1 1ED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 7 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................................. 7 OUTCOMES OF THE LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT ..................................................... 7 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 10 APPLYING THE SEQUENTIAL TEST FOR PLAN MAKING PURPOSES ...................................................... 10 APPLYING THE EXCEPTION TEST FOR PLAN MAKING PURPOSES ....................................................... 11 STUDY AREA ..........................................................................................................................
  • Manual for Design Codes • West Northamptonshire Development Corporation • December 2009 Section Two: Context Appraisal 23

    Manual for Design Codes • West Northamptonshire Development Corporation • December 2009 Section Two: Context Appraisal 23

    section two Context Appraisal • Purpose of the Context Appraisal • The National Context • The Regional Context • Northampton • Daventry • Towcester • West Northamptonshire Villages • Topography and the Built Form • Employment Areas Context Appraisal Manual for Design Codes • West Northamptonshire Development Corporation • December 2009 Section Two: Context Appraisal 23 2.1 Purpose of the Context Appraisal Understanding the unique character and sense of place of the region as a whole and of the three towns and surrounding villages, is a vital prerequisite to regenerating, creating and developing new places. This context appraisal, based on fieldwork and a study of the existing literature, expands on the particular features of the towns of Northampton, Daventry and Towcester and a number of surrounding villages. The section begins with an analysis of West Northamptonshire at the national and regional levels. It covers the geographical, historic, socio-economic and spatial features that shaped its development and led to the current conditions. This is followed by a review of each town, examining the typology of movement; the historic development; and the streetscape, townscape and architecture of the various areas within each town. Together these elements embody the local distinctiveness of Northampton, Daventry and Towcester and their surrounding villages. The information contained in this section is not only applicable to development within the WNDC’s boundary but can also be drawn upon in the consideration of new development within the
  • Northamptonshire Past and Present, No 61

    Northamptonshire Past and Present, No 61

    JOURNAL OF THE NORTHAMPTONSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY WOOTTON HALL PARK, NORTHAMPTON NN4 8BQ ORTHAMPTONSHIRE CONTENTS Page NPAST AND PRESENT Notes and News . 5 Number 61 (2008) Fact and/or Folklore? The Case for St Pega of Peakirk Avril Lumley Prior . 7 The Peterborough Chronicles Nicholas Karn and Edmund King . 17 Fermour vs Stokes of Warmington: A Case Before Lady Margaret Beaufort’s Council, c. 1490-1500 Alan Rogers . 30 Daventry’s Craft Companies 1574-1675 Colin Davenport . 42 George London at Castle Ashby Peter McKay . 56 Rushton Hall and its Parklands: A Multi-Layered Landscape Jenny Burt . 64 Politics in Late Victorian and Edwardian Northamptonshire John Adams . 78 The Wakerley Calciner Furnaces Jack Rodney Laundon . 86 Joan Wake and the Northamptonshire Record Society Sir Hereward Wake . 88 The Northamptonshire Reference Database Barry and Liz Taylor . 94 Book Reviews . 95 Obituary Notices . 102 Index . 103 Cover illustration: Courteenhall House built in 1791 by Sir William Wake, 9th Baronet. Samuel Saxon, architect, and Humphry Repton, landscape designer. Number 61 2008 £3.50 NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PAST AND PRESENT PAST NORTHAMPTONSHIRE Northamptonshire Record Society NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PAST AND PRESENT 2008 Number 61 CONTENTS Page Notes and News . 5 Fact and/or Folklore? The Case for St Pega of Peakirk . 7 Avril Lumley Prior The Peterborough Chronicles . 17 Nicholas Karn and Edmund King Fermour vs Stokes of Warmington: A Case Before Lady Margaret Beaufort’s Council, c.1490-1500 . 30 Alan Rogers Daventry’s Craft Companies 1574-1675 . 42 Colin Davenport George London at Castle Ashby . 56 Peter McKay Rushton Hall and its Parklands: A Multi-Layered Landscape .
  • Revital-ISE Project Plan

    Revital-ISE Project Plan

    Project Plan October 2008 to May 2010 „Revitalising the River Ise and its surrounding environment‟ Dr Robin Field Revital-ISE Project Officer Version 1 11.3.2009 Contents 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 The Revital-ISE Project 2.0 Aims 2.1 Biodiversity 2.2 Historical environment 2.3 Access 2.4 Community involvement 2.5 Leisure and recreation 2.6 Landscape character 2.7 Partnership working 2.8 Funding opportunities 3.0 Objectives 3.1 Biodiversity 3.2 Historical environment 3.3 Access 3.4 Community involvement 3.5 Leisure and recreation 3.6 Landscape character 3.7 Partners 3.8 Funding Version 1 11.3.2009 4.0 Project plan 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Project funding 4.3 Project list List of Figures Figure 1: Priority areas Figure 2: Red area Figure 3: Yellow area Figure 4: Green area Figure 5: Project locations Revital-ISE Project River Nene Regional Park Community Interest Company, c/o Northamptonshire County Council, PO Box 221, John Dryden House, 8-10 The Lakes, Northampton, NN4 7DE Tel: 01604 237243, Fax: 01604 236696 Version 1 11.3.2009 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background The River Ise is the largest of the tributaries of the River Nene in Northamptonshire, rising near Naseby and flowing east past Desborough, turning south at Geddington and passing through Kettering to join the River Nene at Wellingborough. In the upper reaches the river is largely unmodified and retains typical natural features such as meanders, riffles and pools. Indeed the 4.7km reach east of Barford Bridge is the only section of river in Northamptonshire to be designated a Site of Special Scientific Interest.
  • North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy

    North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy

    NORTH NORTHAMptonSHIRE CORE SpatIAL StRateGY ADOPTED JUNE 2008 NORTH NORTHAMptonSHIRE CORE SpatIAL StRateGY ContentS 1. Introduction 3 4. Building Sustainable Communities 60 North Northamptonshire Local Development Framework 4 Policy 13 General Sustainable Development Principles 62 Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment 5 Policy 14 Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Construction 67 Format and Content of this Document 7 Policy 15 Sustainable Housing Provision 69 Context for the Plan 7 Policy 16 Sustainable Urban Extensions 71 The Plan Period 10 Policy 17 Gypsies and Travellers 72 2. Issues, Vision and Objectives 11 5. Monitoring and Review of the Plan 73 Portrait of North Northamptonshire 11 Issues to be addressed in the Core Spatial Strategy 17 Appendix 1 82 Setting the Strategic Direction of the Plan 19 Objectives for Realising the Vision 19 List of Tables Table 1 Settlement Roles 24 3. The Spatial Strategy 22 Table 2 Strategic and Local Infrastructure 37 Table 3 Average Annual Housing Provision Rates 46 A. A Strong Network of Settlements 23 2001-2021 Policy 1 Strengthening the Network of Settlements 25 Table 4 Proposed Job Growth 48 Table 5 Distribution of Housing 52 B. A Well Connected North Northamptonshire 27 Table 6 Job Growth by District and Sector 56 Policy 2 Connecting North Northamptonshire with Table 7 Performance Indicators and Targets for Surrounding Areas 29 Monitoring 75 Policy 3 Connecting the Urban Core 31 Policy 4 Enhancing Local Connections 32 List of Figures Figure 1 North Northamptonshire 3 C. Green Infrastructure 32 Figure 2 Regional Context 4 Policy 5 Green Infrastructure 35 Figure 3 Local Development Framework 5 Figure 4 Core Spatial Strategy: Processes and D.
  • A Green Infrastructure Delivery Plan for the Kettering Borough

    A Green Infrastructure Delivery Plan for the Kettering Borough

    A Green Infrastructure Delivery Plan for the Kettering Borough River Nene Regional Park March 2018 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................... 2 Defining Green Infrastructure....................................................................................................................... 3 Background.......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Best practice principles for Green Infrastructure .................................................................................. 3 Document Lay-out ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Using this Document ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 6 Desk Top Review ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Stakeholder and Community Engagement ............................................................................................... 8 Context and Evidence Base ................................................................................... 10 Strategic and Local
  • Daventry District Council Clipston Conservation Area Appraisal And

    Daventry District Council Clipston Conservation Area Appraisal And

    Daventry District Council Clipston Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan Supplementary Planning Document Statement of Consultation Adopted March 2021 1 Introduction This report sets out the consultation undertaken on the Clipston Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan Supplementary Planning Document (SPD). This report is required by regulation 12 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2012. At its meeting on 12th November 2020 the Council’s Strategy Group resolved that consultation could take place on the document. Consultation Consultation commenced on 23rd November 2020 for eight weeks. The Parish Council, District Councillors and other consultees and local residents who had asked to be so, were notified. Publicity The draft SPD could be accessed from the Planning Policy, Conservation Areas and Consultation pages of the Daventry District Council Website. Paper copies were available by post on request. The Council placed a notice on the Council’s website, a copy of which is included at Appendix A. Consultation Period Consultation took place with organisations referenced above and local residents on the document for a period of 8 weeks until 5.00pm on Monday 18th January 2021. A public online meeting Tuesday 15th December 2020 and a recording of the meeting was subsequently made available on Daventry District Council’s website. Comments received. Responses were received, some via email and some via an online questionnaire. These are set out in appendix B. Consideration of Responses The Council carefully considered all of the comments received. A number of changes were made to the document as a result of these responses. These changes are set out in appendix B.
  • NCC Response to Draft Arrangements

    NCC Response to Draft Arrangements

    Northamptonshire County Council Further Electoral Review Comments on LGBCE Draft Divisional Arrangements (Stage 3) Submission to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) August 2012 FINAL Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Support for the Council’s proposal ................................................................................. 4 2. Kettering Borough ................................................................................................................ 5 3. Wellingborough .................................................................................................................. 10 4. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 13 5. Appendices......................................................................................................................... 14 Appendix 1: Responses from Kettering stakeholders .............................................................. 14 2 NCC Response to draft Electoral Arrangements FINAL Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to outline amendments to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) draft proposals for Northamptonshire. This aim of the Electoral Review is to improve electoral equality. This means ensuring, as far as is reasonable, that each councillor represents the same number of electors. Northamptonshire
  • Northamptonshire Past & Present: Volume 5, No 5, 1977

    Northamptonshire Past & Present: Volume 5, No 5, 1977

    / No. 5 • \YEF.lTY :\\ ·n. \\LL • 't F\L\.\1 .. ~nqitnt and MODERN .. large or small. Fine building is synonymous · with Robert Marriott Ltd., a member of the Robert Marriott Group, famous for quality building since 1890. In the past 80 years Marriotts have established a reputation for meticulous craftsmanship on the largest and small­ est scales. Whether it is a £7,000,000 housing contract near Bletchley, a new head­ quarters for Buckinghamshire County Council at Aylesbury (right) or restor­ ation and alterations to Easton Maudit Church (left) Marriotts have the experi­ ence, the expertise and the men to carry out work of the most exacting standards and to a strict schedule. In the last century Marriotts made a name for itself by the skill of its crafts­ men employed on restoring buildings of great historical importance. A re­ markable t ri bute to the firm's founder, the late Mr. Robert Marriott was paid in 1948 by Sir Albert Richardson, later President of the Royal Academy, when he said: " He was a master builder of the calibre of the Grimbolds and other famous country men. He spared no pains and placed ultimate good before financial gain. No mean craftsman him­ self, he demanded similar excellence from his helpers." Three-quarters of a century later Marriotts' highly specialised Special Projects Division displays the same inherent skills in the same delicate work on buildings throughout the Midlands. To date Hatfield House, Long Melford Hall in Suffolk, the Branch Library at Earls Barton, the restoration of Castle Cottage at Higham Ferrers, Fisons Ltd., Cambridge, Greens Norton School, Woburn Abbey restorations and the- Falcon Inn, Castle Ashby, all bear witness to the craftsmanship of Marriotts.
  • Climate Change Working Group Update

    Climate Change Working Group Update

    BOROUGH COUNCIL OF WELLINGBOROUGH AGENDA ITEM 8 Council 8 December 2020 Report of the Managing Director CLIMATE CHANGE WORKING GROUP UPDATE 1 Purpose of report To advise members of the progress of the climate change working group to deliver the council’s climate change strategy. 2 Executive summary 2.1 A climate change working group was convened on 5 September 2019, to refresh the council’s climate change strategy and present this to council. At this meeting, members noted the progress made within the councils’ climate change strategy action plan and agreed the future actions. It also agreed to receive a refreshed Northamptonshire climate change strategy. 2.2 A further meeting of the climate change working group took place on 15 September 2020, where the group received updates on the progress made over the last twelve months. At the meeting, it was agreed that the progress report would be presented to all members at the next available council meeting. 3 Appendices Appendix A - Northamptonshire climate change strategy (2020-2023) Appendix B - Borough Council of Wellingborough climate change strategy action plan - progress within the borough Appendix C - Notes from the climate change working group meeting on 15 September 2020 4 Proposed action: The council is invited to RESOLVE to; 4.1 note the partnership approach being taken to deliver the Northamptonshire climate change strategy (2020-2023) 4.2 agree the action plan and note progress at appendix B 4.3 note the progress from the climate change working group 5 Background 5.1 Following a motion at council on 9 July 2019 it was resolved Parliament had declared a climate emergency and this council would commit to playing its proper part in delivering on national commitments, as far as it can, within the constraints of limited time, power and resources, under which it operates.
  • Kettering SWMP Approach

    Kettering SWMP Approach

    Kettering Borough Surface Water Management Plan Kettering Borough Council October 2018 Final Report October 2018 AECOM Kettering Borough Surface Water Management Plan i Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Craig Boorman James Latham Sarah Kelly Assistant Consultant Senior Flood Risk Engineer Regional Director Sarah Littlewood Sarah Kelly Senior Consultant Regional Director James Latham Senior Consultant Revision Revision date Details Authorised Name Position 1 October 2016 Draft SWMP Report Oct. 2016 JR Director - Water for Client Comment 2 May 2017 Final Draft SWMP May 2017 JR Director - Water Report incorporating stakeholder comments 3 March 2018 Final Draft SWMP March 2018 SK Regional Director Report incorporating stakeholder comments 4 October 2018 Final Report October 2018 SK Regional Director Prepared for Kettering Borough Council AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Midpoint Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP UK T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without
  • West Northamptonshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

    West Northamptonshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

    West Northamptonshire Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Part 1 Northamptonshire County Council December 2017 REVISION SCHEDULE West Northamptonshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. Revision Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by st 01 31 July Draft SFRA Josie Bateman Phil Jones Alison Parry 2017 Level 1 th 02 5 Interim Josie Bateman Aiden Grist Alison Parry October Draft SFRA 2017 Level 1 th 03 14 Final Draft Josie Bateman Aiden Grist Alison Parry November SFRA Level 2017 1 th 04 5 Final SFRA Josie Bateman Aiden Grist Alison Parry December Level 1 2017 SFRA Northamptonshire County Council Place Directorate Flood and water Management One Angel Square 4 Angel Street Northampton NN1 1ED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 7 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................................. 7 OUTCOMES OF THE LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT ..................................................... 7 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 10 APPLYING THE SEQUENTIAL TEST FOR PLAN MAKING PURPOSES ...................................................... 10 APPLYING THE EXCEPTION TEST FOR PLAN MAKING PURPOSES ....................................................... 11 STUDY AREA ..........................................................................................................................