DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Download PERSPECTIVES EVOLUTION The male-only nest care system of some birds may have its evolutionary origins in theropod Who’s Your Daddy? dinosaur behavior. Richard O. Prum he recognition that birds are theropod related to birds—Troodon, Oviraptor, and rex as well as in basal birds (7) indicate that dinosaurs has redefined the science of Citipati—that the individuals caring for those female Troodon, Oviraptor, and Citipati should Tornithology as extant dinosaur biol- clutches of eggs were males. Because the also exhibit medullary bone. Varricchio et al. ogy (1). The placement of birds in a detailed basal lineage of living birds, or the earliest show that the Troodon, Oviraptor, and Citipati evolutionary context has led to exciting dis- branch in the avian phylogenetic tree, also has individuals fossilized at nests lacked medullary coveries about the commonalities birds share predominantly male-only nest care, their dis- bone, independently supporting the conclusion with their dinosaur ancestors, including covery may have uncovered the dinosaurian that they were males. feathers (2) and possibly flight (3). Insights origins of the breeding biology of living birds. Over 90% of living birds have biparental have been gained into both the origins Varricchio et al. use two lines of evidence to care. A small group of species have exclu- of avian biology and the natural history of support their revolutionary conclusion. First, sively female care, but less than 100 species of some of the most charismatic dinosaurs—the they compared clutch volumes to adult body living birds have exclusively male parental care (8). In these species, males build the nest, incubate the eggs, and raise the young, whereas females mate with multiple males and lay their eggs in multiple nests, which on December 19, 2008 www.sciencemag.org Parental care in theropod dinosaurs. Fossil evidence has shown that theropod vided the care, similar to living birds at the base of the avian phylogeny, includ- dinosaurs such as Oviraptor cared for their young (left)(6). Based on a new ing ostriches (Struthio camelus) (middle) and highland tinamous (Nothocercus analysis, Varricchio et al. (4) hypothesize that it was male theropods who pro- bonapartei) (right). meat-eating, bipedal theropods. The divi- sizes for a sample of living archosaurs—the may or may not be within a defended territory. dends continue with the report by Varricchio group of reptiles that includes crocodilians, The birds with the most consistent pattern of et al. on page 1826 of this issue (4), in which birds, and other dinosaurs. They found that male nest care are the basal lineage of living Downloaded from the authors show that fatherhood in thero- Troodon, Oviraptor, and Citipati have larger birds, called Paleognathes, which include the pods was about more than just looking clutch volumes for their body sizes than most flightless ostrich, emu, cassowary, kiwi, and macho and gnashing teeth. of the more than 400 extant species of birds and rhea, and the flying neotropical tinamous (9) Biological views of dinosaur parenting crocodilians examined, but that their clutch vol- (see the figure, right panel). have evolved a lot over the past century. In umes closely match the expected values for Some behavioral ecologists have hypoth- 1924, Osborn named a Cretaceous theropod birds with exclusively male parental care. esized that male-only parental care was the Oviraptor, or “egg seizer,” because it had been Clutch volumes can evolve to be larger in original breeding system of living birds (8), fossilized “in the very act of robbing [a] species without maternal care, because females and the basal phylogenetic position of dinosaur egg nest” (5). In 1995, new speci- may have more resources to devote to eggs if Paleognathes has been used to support this mens showed that Oviraptor was not stealing they provide no care and because a “clutch” hypothesis (10). In the absence of any data those eggs, but caring for them and possibly may be composed of eggs from multiple on parental care in extinct dinosaurs, how- even brooding them (see the figure, left panel) females. Second, Varricchio et al. took advan- ever, phylogenetic systematists have argued (6). Now, Varricchio et al. (4) present com- tage of a distinctive feature of avian reproduc- that female-only parental care, found both in pelling evidence from three theropods closely tive physiology to determine the sex of the birds and crocodilians, was the primitive dinosaurs from their bones. Many female birds breeding system of birds (11). Most re- lay down a distinctive layer of spongy, cently, Wesolowski (12) argued against the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and medullary bone inside their long bones during theropod origin of avian breeding behavior Peabody Museum of Natural History, Post Office Box 208105, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. reproduction (7). Recent observations of while reiterating the male-care-first hypoth- CREDIT: (LEFT PANEL) DENNIS FINNIN AND MICK ELLISON/AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY. (MIDDLE PANEL) KEVIN SCHAFER/CORBIS. (RIGHT PANEL) MICHAEL AND PATRICIA FOGDEN/CORBIS PATRICIA AND MICHAEL PANEL) (RIGHT SCHAFER/CORBIS. KEVIN PANEL) (MIDDLE HISTORY. NATURAL OF MUSEUM ELLISON/AMERICAN MICK AND FINNIN DENNIS PANEL) (LEFT CREDIT: E-mail: [email protected] medullary bone in the theropod Tyrannosaurus esis. In a result that is sure to surprise both www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 322 19 DECEMBER 2008 1799 Published by AAAS PERSPECTIVES camps, Varricchio et al. show that the thero- Paleognathes and the oviraptorans and limits to ornithological revelations that the pod origin of avian breeding behavior is troodontids (including the huge, flightless, theropod origin of birds will yield? It seems consistent with male parental care as the colonial diver Hesperornis, the pigeon-sized not. Focused research and lucky paleonto- primitive breeding system of birds, thus Confuciusornis with elongate ornamental tail logical discoveries may someday uncover the resolving the conflict between ecological feathers, and the archetypal Archaeopteryx). theropod origin of bird song, avian respira- and phylogenetic ornithologists. Many of these creatures seem so similar tion, and more. These researchers have an excellent track in ecology to various modern birds with record of establishing details of extinct thero- biparental care that it is tempting to think that References 1. R. O. Prum, Auk 119, 1 (2002). pod biology that have changed our views of their breeding biology should also be similar. 2. R. O. Prum, A. H. Brush, Quart. Rev. Biol. 77, 261 (2002). the origins of avian biology. In 1997, However, Varricchio et al.’s hypothesis may 3. X. Xu et al., Nature 421, 335 (2003). Varricchio et al. (13) proposed that Troodon be supported by the observation that the 4. D. J. Varricchio et al., Science 322, 1826 (2008). 5. H. F. Osborn, Am. Mus. Nov. 144, 1 (1924). laid their eggs two at a time and that the male-only parental care system has resisted 6. M. A. Norell, J. M. Clark, L. Chiappe, D. Dashzeveg, uniquely avian behavior of laying the clutch of evolutionary change. Most Paleognathes Nature 378, 774 (1995). eggs over a series of days evolved in theropods have retained this breeding system, despite 7. M. H. Schweitzer, J. L. Wittemeyer, J. R. Horner, Science 308, 1456 (2005). before the origin of birds or flight. This bold substantial ecological radiation, since before 8. J. D. Ligon, The Evolution of Avian Breeding Systems idea was dramatically confirmed in 2005 with the K/T boundary over 65 million years ago (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1999). a discovery of an oviraptoran fossil with a pair (15, 16). Thus, there may be substantial con- 9. S. J. J. F. Davies, Ratites and Tinamous (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2001). of shelled eggs inside her pelvis (14). straints to evolving female incubation if her 10. T. Wesolowski, Am. Nat. 143, 39 (1994). According to the new hypothesis (4), the female ancestors have not done so for tens of 11. B. S. Tullberg, M. Ah-King, H. Temrin, Philos. Trans. R. parental behaviors of living Paleognathes millions of years before her. Soc. B 357, 251 (2002). 12. T. Wesolowski, Behav. Ecol. 15, 520 (2004). (like the cassowary) and extinct theropods In the absence of a coherent hypothesis 13. D. J. Varricchio, F. Jackson, J. J. Borkowski, J. R. Horner, (like Oviraptor) are homologous, and their for the origin of birds during the greater part Nature 385, 247 (1997). breeding systems remained unchanged since of the 20th century, most evolutionary expla- 14. T. Sato, Y. Cheng, X. Wu, D. K. Zelenitsky, Y. Hsiao, Science 308, 375 (2005). their common ancestry. But could male nations of avian biology focused on how 15. J. Clarke et al., Nature 433, 305 (2005). parental care have evolved independently in unique birds are (1). Scientists are now iden- 16. J. W. Brown et al., BMC Biol. 6, 6 (2008). Paleognathes and Cretaceous dinosaurs? tifying the dinosaurian origins of many of the on December 19, 2008 There are many lineages between the formerly unique features of birds. Are there 10.1126/science.1168808 COMPUTER SCIENCE The use of robots to care for the young and the old, and as autonomous agents on the The Ethical Frontiers of Robotics battlefield, raises ethical issues. www.sciencemag.org Noel Sharkey obots have been used in laboratories ments that allowed robots to become mobile, semiautonomous function are ideal for visual and factories for many years, but their interactive machines. Artificial intelligence and auditory monitoring; radio-frequency Ruses are changing fast. Since the turn has not met its early promise of truly intelli- identification tags provide alerts when chil- of the century, sales of professional and per- gent machines, but researchers in the emerg- dren move out of range. The robots can be sonal service robots have risen sharply and are ing field of human-robot interaction have controlled by mobile phone or from a window estimated to total ~5.5 million in 2008.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Comprehensive Multilocus Phylogeny of the Neotropical Cotingas
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 81 (2014) 120–136 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A comprehensive multilocus phylogeny of the Neotropical cotingas (Cotingidae, Aves) with a comparative evolutionary analysis of breeding system and plumage dimorphism and a revised phylogenetic classification ⇑ Jacob S. Berv 1, Richard O. Prum Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208105, New Haven, CT 06520, USA article info abstract Article history: The Neotropical cotingas (Cotingidae: Aves) are a group of passerine birds that are characterized by Received 18 April 2014 extreme diversity in morphology, ecology, breeding system, and behavior. Here, we present a compre- Revised 24 July 2014 hensive phylogeny of the Neotropical cotingas based on six nuclear and mitochondrial loci (7500 bp) Accepted 6 September 2014 for a sample of 61 cotinga species in all 25 genera, and 22 species of suboscine outgroups. Our taxon sam- Available online 16 September 2014 ple more than doubles the number of cotinga species studied in previous analyses, and allows us to test the monophyly of the cotingas as well as their intrageneric relationships with high resolution. We ana- Keywords: lyze our genetic data using a Bayesian species tree method, and concatenated Bayesian and maximum Phylogenetics likelihood methods, and present a highly supported phylogenetic hypothesis. We confirm the monophyly Bayesian inference Species-tree of the cotingas, and present the first phylogenetic evidence for the relationships of Phibalura flavirostris as Sexual selection the sister group to Ampelion and Doliornis, and the paraphyly of Lipaugus with respect to Tijuca.
    [Show full text]
  • A. K. Rozhdestvensky HISTORY of the DINOSAUR FAUNA of ASIA
    A. K. Rozhdestvensky HISTORY OF THE DINOSAUR FAUNA OF ASIA AND OTHER CONTINENTS AND QUESTIONS CONCERNING PALEOGEOGRAPHY* The distribution and evolution of dinosaur faunas during the period of their existence, from the Late Triassic to the end of the Cretaceous, shows a close connection with the paleogeography of the Mesozoic. However these questions were hard to examine on a global scale until recently, because only the dinosaurs of North America were well known, where during the last century were found their richest deposits and where the best paleontologists were studying them — J. Leidy, E. Cope, O. Marsh, R. Lull, H. Osborn, C. Gilmore, B. Brown, and later many others. On the remaining continents, including Europe, where the study of dinosaurs started earlier than it did in America, the information was rather incomplete due to the fragmentary condition of the finds and rare, episodic studies. The Asian continent remained unexplored the longest, preventing any intercontinental comparisons. Systematic exploration and large excavations of dinosaur locations in Asia, which began in the last fifty years (Osborn, 1930; Efremov, 1954; Rozhdestvenskiy, 1957a, 1961, 1969, 1971; Rozhdestvenskiy & Chzhou, 1960; Kielan-Jaworowska & Dovchin, 1968; Kurochkin, Kalandadze, & Reshetov, 1970; Barsbold, Voronin, & Zhegallo, 1971) showed that this continent has abundant dinosaur remains, particularly in its central part (Fig. 1). Their study makes it possible to establish a faunal connection between Asia and other continents, correlate the stratigraphy of continental deposits of the Mesozoic, because dinosaurs are reliable leading forms, as well as to make corrections in the existing paleogeographic structure. The latter, in their turn, promote a better understanding of the possible paths of distribution of the individual groups of dinosaurs, the reasons for their appearance, their development, and disappearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Perinate and Eggs of a Giant Caenagnathid Dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Central China
    ARTICLE Received 29 Jul 2016 | Accepted 15 Feb 2017 | Published 9 May 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14952 OPEN Perinate and eggs of a giant caenagnathid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of central China Hanyong Pu1, Darla K. Zelenitsky2, Junchang Lu¨3, Philip J. Currie4, Kenneth Carpenter5,LiXu1, Eva B. Koppelhus4, Songhai Jia1, Le Xiao1, Huali Chuang1, Tianran Li1, Martin Kundra´t6 & Caizhi Shen3 The abundance of dinosaur eggs in Upper Cretaceous strata of Henan Province, China led to the collection and export of countless such fossils. One of these specimens, recently repatriated to China, is a partial clutch of large dinosaur eggs (Macroelongatoolithus) with a closely associated small theropod skeleton. Here we identify the specimen as an embryo and eggs of a new, large caenagnathid oviraptorosaur, Beibeilong sinensis. This specimen is the first known association between skeletal remains and eggs of caenagnathids. Caenagnathids and oviraptorids share similarities in their eggs and clutches, although the eggs of Beibeilong are significantly larger than those of oviraptorids and indicate an adult body size comparable to a gigantic caenagnathid. An abundance of Macroelongatoolithus eggs reported from Asia and North America contrasts with the dearth of giant caenagnathid skeletal remains. Regardless, the large caenagnathid-Macroelongatoolithus association revealed here suggests these dinosaurs were relatively common during the early Late Cretaceous. 1 Henan Geological Museum, Zhengzhou 450016, China. 2 Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4. 3 Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China. 4 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9. 5 Prehistoric Museum, Utah State University, 155 East Main Street, Price, Utah 84501, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • New Oviraptorid Dinosaur (Dinosauria: Oviraptorosauria) from the Nemegt Formation of Southwestern Mongolia
    Bull. Natn. Sci. Mus., Tokyo, Ser. C, 30, pp. 95–130, December 22, 2004 New Oviraptorid Dinosaur (Dinosauria: Oviraptorosauria) from the Nemegt Formation of Southwestern Mongolia Junchang Lü1, Yukimitsu Tomida2, Yoichi Azuma3, Zhiming Dong4 and Yuong-Nam Lee5 1 Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China 2 National Science Museum, 3–23–1 Hyakunincho, Shinjukuku, Tokyo 169–0073, Japan 3 Fukui Prefectural Dinosaur Museum, 51–11 Terao, Muroko, Katsuyama 911–8601, Japan 4 Institute of Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China 5 Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Geology & Geoinformation Division, 30 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305–350, South Korea Abstract Nemegtia barsboldi gen. et sp. nov. here described is a new oviraptorid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous (mid-Maastrichtian) Nemegt Formation of southwestern Mongolia. It differs from other oviraptorids in the skull having a well-developed crest, the anterior margin of which is nearly vertical, and the dorsal margin of the skull and the anterior margin of the crest form nearly 90°; the nasal process of the premaxilla being less exposed on the dorsal surface of the skull than those in other known oviraptorids; the length of the frontal being approximately one fourth that of the parietal along the midline of the skull. Phylogenetic analysis shows that Nemegtia barsboldi is more closely related to Citipati osmolskae than to any other oviraptorosaurs. Key words : Nemegt Basin, Mongolia, Nemegt Formation, Late Cretaceous, Oviraptorosauria, Nemegtia. dae, and Caudipterygidae (Barsbold, 1976; Stern- Introduction berg, 1940; Currie, 2000; Clark et al., 2001; Ji et Oviraptorosaurs are generally regarded as non- al., 1998; Zhou and Wang, 2000; Zhou et al., avian theropod dinosaurs (Osborn, 1924; Bars- 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Another Darwinian Aesthetics
    This is a repository copy of Another Darwinian Aesthetics. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/103826/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Wilson, Catherine orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-4072 (2016) Another Darwinian Aesthetics. Journal of aesthetics and art criticism. pp. 237-252. ISSN 0021-8529 https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12283 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Another Darwinian Aesthetics (Last ms version). Published Version: WILSON, CATHERINE. "Another Darwinian Aesthetics." The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74.3 (2016): 237-252. Despite the bright sun, dew was still dripping from the chrysanthemums in the garden. On the bamboo fences, and criss-cross hedges, I saw tatters of spiderwebs; and where the threads were broken the raindrops hung on them like strings of white pearls. I was greatly moved and delighted. …Later I described to people how beautiful it all was.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Volume 9
    Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Volume 9 Editors: Charles T. Wolfe, Ghent University, Belgium Philippe Huneman, IHPST (CNRS/Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne), France Thomas A.C. Reydon, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Editorial Board: Editors Charles T. Wolfe, Ghent University, Belgium Philippe Huneman, IHPST (CNRS/Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne), France Thomas A.C. Reydon, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Editorial Board Marshall Abrams (University of Alabama at Birmingham) Andre Ariew (Missouri) Minus van Baalen (UPMC, Paris) Domenico Bertoloni Meli (Indiana) Richard Burian (Virginia Tech) Pietro Corsi (EHESS, Paris) François Duchesneau (Université de Montréal) John Dupré (Exeter) Paul Farber (Oregon State) Lisa Gannett (Saint Mary’s University, Halifax) Andy Gardner (Oxford) Paul Griffi ths (Sydney) Jean Gayon (IHPST, Paris) Guido Giglioni (Warburg Institute, London) Thomas Heams (INRA, AgroParisTech, Paris) James Lennox (Pittsburgh) Annick Lesne (CNRS, UPMC, Paris) Tim Lewens (Cambridge) Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh) Alexandre Métraux (Archives Poincaré, Nancy) Hans Metz (Leiden) Roberta Millstein (Davis) Staffan Müller-Wille (Exeter) Dominic Murphy (Sydney) François Munoz (Université Montpellier 2) Stuart Newman (New York Medical College) Frederik Nijhout (Duke) Samir Okasha (Bristol) Susan Oyama (CUNY) Kevin Padian (Berkeley) David Queller (Washington University, St Louis) Stéphane Schmitt (SPHERE, CNRS, Paris) Phillip Sloan (Notre Dame) Jacqueline Sullivan
    [Show full text]
  • Reading: Masters of Light: the Science Behind Nature's Brightest
    Masters of Light: The Science Behind Nature’s Brightest Colors JULIA ROTHCHILD DECEMBER 30, 2014 0 In the sands of the Yukon Territory in Canada, a scientist found a beetle embedded with nano-scale diamonds. The insect was a small, brown member of the weevil family. It was plated with hollow scales, inside each of which expanses of nano-crystals had grown. Every diamond was placed exactly the same distance apart, yielding a formidably regular array that extended up and down and side to side, filling the insides of the beetle’s scales with a rigid, repeating matrix. The insect unearthed in the Yukon sand had been preserved for over half a million years as a fossil. Yale researchers inspected the preserved material using high energy X-rays at Argonne National Laboratory in Chicago in order to study the configuration of crystals. Although the structures they discovered are especially beautiful and intriguing, diamond-filled scales are not unique: many creatures alive today grow identical or similar nano-size arrays. Animals grow these sorts of structures because they are optical powerhouses. By manipulating light, the crystals allow animals to produce brilliant colors that are otherwise unattainable. Making Blue Consider the color blue. There are no blue bears in the world. There are no blue crocodiles either. There are also no blue kangaroos, blue bumblebees, blue cats, or blue dogs. There aren’t very many blue animals in the world, period, because blue is a difficult color to make. Most of the other colors of the rainbow arise straightforwardly in nature from chemicals, called pigments, that animals collect in their skin, feathers, and hair.
    [Show full text]
  • Norntates PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 3265, 36 Pp., 15 Figures May 4, 1999
    AMERICANt MUSEUM Norntates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 3265, 36 pp., 15 figures May 4, 1999 An Oviraptorid Skeleton from the Late Cretaceous of Ukhaa Tolgod, Mongolia, Preserved in an Avianlike Brooding Position Over an Oviraptorid Nest JAMES M. CLARK,I MARK A. NORELL,2 AND LUIS M. CHIAPPE3 ABSTRACT The articulated postcranial skeleton of an ovi- presence of a single, ossified ventral segment in raptorid dinosaur (Theropoda, Coelurosauria) each rib as well as ossified uncinate processes from the Late Cretaceous Djadokhta Formation associated with the thoracic ribs. Remnants of of Ukhaa Tolgod, Mongolia, is preserved over- keratinous sheaths are preserved with four of the lying a nest. The eggs are similar in size, shape, manal claws, and the bony and keratinous claws and ornamentation to another egg from this lo- were as strongly curved as the manal claws of cality in which an oviraptorid embryo is pre- Archaeopteryx and the pedal claws of modern served, suggesting that the nest is of the same climbing birds. The skeleton is positioned over species as the adult skeleton overlying it and was the center of the nest, with its limbs arranged parented by the adult. The lack of a skull pre- symmetrically on either side and its arms spread cludes specific identification, but in several fea- out around the nest perimeter. This is one of four tures the specimen is more similar to Oviraptor known oviraptorid skeletons preserved on nests than to other oviraptorids. The ventral part of the of this type of egg, comprising 23.5% of the 17 thorax is exceptionally well preserved and pro- oviraptorid skeletons collected from the Dja- vides evidence for other avian features that were dokhta Formation before 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific Social Dominance Mimicry in Birds
    bs_bs_banner Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014. With 6 figures Interspecific social dominance mimicry in birds RICHARD OWEN PRUM1,2* 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8150, USA 2Peabody Natural History Museum, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8150, USA Received 3 May 2014; revised 17 June 2014; accepted for publication 21 July 2014 Interspecific social dominance mimicry (ISDM) is a proposed form of social parasitism in which a subordinate species evolves to mimic and deceive a dominant ecological competitor in order to avoid attack by the dominant, model species. The evolutionary plausibility of ISDM has been established previously by the Hairy-Downy game (Prum & Samuelson). Psychophysical models of avian visual acuity support the plausibility of visual ISDM at distances ∼>2–3 m for non-raptorial birds, and ∼>20 m for raptors. Fifty phylogenetically independent examples of avian ISDM involving 60 model and 93 mimic species, subspecies, and morphs from 30 families are proposed and reviewed. Patterns of size differences, phylogeny, and coevolutionary radiation generally support the predic- tions of ISDM. Mimics average 56–58% of the body mass of the proposed model species. Mimics may achieve a large potential deceptive social advantage with <20% reduction in linear body size, which is well within the range of plausible, visual size confusion. Several, multispecies mimicry complexes are proposed (e.g. kiskadee- type flycatchers) which may coevolve through hierarchical variation in the deceptive benefits, similar to Müllerian mimicry. ISDM in birds should be tested further with phylogenetic, ecological, and experimental investigations of convergent similarity in appearance, ecological competition, and aggressive social interactions between sympatric species.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Osteology of Beipiaosaurus Inexpectus
    第57卷 第2期 古 脊 椎 动 物 学 报 pp. 117–132 figs. 1–3 2019年4月 VERTEBRATA PALASIATICA DOI: 10.19615/j.cnki.1000-3118.190115 Cranial osteology of Beipiaosaurus inexpectus (Theropoda: Therizinosauria) LIAO Chun-Chi1,2,3 XU Xing1,2* (1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100044 * Corresponding author: [email protected]) (2 CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment Beijing 100044) (3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049) Abstract Beipiaosaurus inexpectus, a key taxon for understanding the early evolution of therizinosaurians, has not been fully described since it was briefly reported on by Xu, Tang and Wang in 1999. Here we present a detailed description of the cranial anatomy of the holotype of this theropod dinosaur. B. inexpectus is unique in some of its cranial features such as the postorbital process of the frontal is large and its abrupt transition from the orbital rim, a long and sharp anterior process of the parietal, the elongate ventral ramus of the squamosal process of parietal, and external mandibular fenestra deep dorsoventrally and extremely posteriorly located. A number of plesiomorphic cranial features (such as relatively large dentary and less downturned degree of dentary symphysis) suggest that B. inexpectus is an early-branching Therizinosaurian, as proposed by previous studies. New information derived from our study is not only important for our understanding of the cranial anatomy of B. inexpectus but also significant to the study of the evolution of Therizinosauria.
    [Show full text]
  • Featured Article Cranial Anatomy of Erlikosaurus Andrewsi (Dinosauria, Therizinosauria): New Insights Based on Digital Reconstru
    Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 34(6):1263–1291, November 2014 Ó 2014 by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology FEATURED ARTICLE CRANIAL ANATOMY OF ERLIKOSAURUS ANDREWSI (DINOSAURIA, THERIZINOSAURIA): NEW INSIGHTS BASED ON DIGITAL RECONSTRUCTION STEPHAN LAUTENSCHLAGER,*,1 LAWRENCE M. WITMER,2 PERLE ALTANGEREL,3 LINDSAY E. ZANNO,4,5 and EMILY J. RAYFIELD1 1School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K., [email protected]; 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, U.S.A.; 3National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia; 4Nature Research Center, NC Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, U.S.A.; 5Department of Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27601, U.S.A. ABSTRACT—The skull of Erlikosaurus andrewsi from the Upper Cretaceous Baishin Tsav locality of Mongolia represents the only known three-dimensionally preserved and nearly complete skull of a therizinosaurian. Computed tomographic (CT) scanning of the original specimen and three-dimensional visualization techniques allow the cranial skeleton to be digitally prepared, disarticulated, and restored. Here, we present a detailed description of the restored skull morphology and the individual cranial elements, including visualization of the internal neurovascular and pneumatic structures. Information gained from this study is used in a revised and emended diagnosis for E. andrewsi. A reappraisal of the evolutionary and functional changes in the cranial skeleton as provided by this study supports prior proposals that a keratinous sheath or rhamphotheca was developed early in the evolution of Therizinosauria. Paralleled by the reduction of functional and replacement teeth, this development indicates a shift in the manner of food processing/procurement at the tip of the snout.
    [Show full text]
  • A Late Cretaceous Diversification of Asian Oviraptorid Dinosaurs
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A Late Cretaceous diversification of Asian oviraptorid dinosaurs: evidence from a new species Received: 10 March 2016 Accepted: 06 October 2016 preserved in an unusual posture Published: 10 November 2016 Junchang Lü1, Rongjun Chen2, Stephen L. Brusatte3, Yangxiao Zhu2 & Caizhi Shen1 Oviraptorosaurs are a bizarre group of bird-like theropod dinosaurs, the derived forms of which have shortened, toothless skulls, and which diverged from close relatives by developing peculiar feeding adaptations. Although once among the most mysterious of dinosaurs, oviraptorosaurs are becoming better understood with the discovery of many new fossils in Asia and North America. The Ganzhou area of southern China is emerging as a hotspot of oviraptorosaur discoveries, as over the past half decade five new monotypic genera have been found in the latest Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) deposits of this region. We here report a sixth diagnostic oviraptorosaur from Ganzhou, Tongtianlong limosus gen. et sp. nov., represented by a remarkably well-preserved specimen in an unusual splayed-limb and raised- head posture. Tongtianlong is a derived oviraptorid oviraptorosaur, differentiated from other species by its unique dome-like skull roof, highly convex premaxilla, and other features of the skull. The large number of oviraptorosaurs from Ganzhou, which often differ in cranial morphologies related to feeding, document an evolutionary radiation of these dinosaurs during the very latest Cretaceous of Asia, which helped establish one of the last diverse dinosaur faunas before the end-Cretaceous extinction. Oviraptorosaurs are some of the most unusual dinosaurs. These bird-like, feathered theropods diverged dra- matically from their close cousins, evolving shortened toothless skulls with a staggering diversity of pneumatic cranial crests in derived forms1.
    [Show full text]