Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd T H A M E S V A L L E Y ARCHAEOLOGICAL S E R V I C E S Coombe Edge, Sunninghill Road, Windlesham, Surrey Archaeological Desk-based Assessment by Steve Preston Site Code CEW13/163 (SU9240 6555) Coombe Edge, Sunninghill Road, Windlesham, Surrey Archaeological Desk-based Assessment for Mr Pratap Shirke by Steve Preston Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code CEW13/163 September 2013 Summary Site name: Coombe Edge, Sunninghill Road, Windlesham, Surrey Grid reference: SU9240 6555 Site activity: Archaeological desk-based assessment Project manager: Steve Ford Site supervisor: Steve Preston Site code: CEW 13/163 Area of site: c. 2.5ha Summary of results: The site occupies an area where virtually nothing of archaeological interest has previously been recorded, but this could be a reflection of the very limited amount of investigation that has taken place. The site’s northern boundary is, however, on the projected line of a major Roman road, while an unconfirmed report of a Roman building not far away suggests a possible roadside settlement in the vicinity. The proposal itself is likely to involve only minimal disturbance of previously undisturbed ground, but where it does, mitigation could be secured by means of a watching brief during groundworks. The proposal also involves demolition of a locally listed building, which is the subject of a separate Statement. This report may be copied for bona fide research or planning purposes without the explicit permission of the copyright holder. All TVAS unpublished fieldwork reports are available on our website: www.tvas.co.uk/reports/reports.asp. Report edited/checked by: Steve Ford9 04.09.13 i Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd, 47–49 De Beauvoir Road, Reading RG1 5NR Tel. (0118) 926 0552; Fax (0118) 926 0553; email: [email protected]; website: www.tvas.co.uk Coombe Edge, Sunninghill Road, Windlesham, Surrey Archaeological Desk-based Assessment by Steve Preston Report 13/163 Introduction This report is an assessment of the archaeological potential of a parcel of land located at Coombe Edge, on the north side of Sunninghill Road, north of Windlesham in north-west Surrey (NGR SU9240 6555) (Fig. 1). The project was commissioned by Mr Chris Gaylord on behalf of Bulmark Inc, c/o Nagle James associates Ltd, 4th Floor, King’s Suite, 15 College Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 1BA, for Mr Pratap Shirke of Coombe Edge, Sunninghill Road, Windlesham, GU20 6PP, and comprises the first stage of a process to determine the presence/absence, extent, character, quality and date of any archaeological remains which may be affected by redevelopment of the area. Planning permission is to be sought for the replacement of the existing house on the site with another of similar proportions on a reduced footprint. This report is not concerned with the existing building itself, which is the subject of a separate Statement (Walker 2013) but confines itself to the potential archaeological impact of the proposal. Site description, location and geology The underlying geology is recorded as Bracklesham Beds (BGS 1976), and the site slopes down from around 70m above Ordnance Datum in the south-west to 65m AOD in the north-east. The house itself sits on a platform slightly (around 0.5m at the south, slightly more at the north) above the surrounding gardens. The area of the tennis court is set around 0.5m below the lawn to its west/south (Pl. 1). Planning background and development proposals Planning permission is to be sought from Surrey Heath Borough Council for the redevelopment of the site to demolish the existing house and replace it with one of similar proportions but on a smaller footprint (Fig. 11). The Department for Communities and Local Government’s National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF 2012) sets out the framework within which local planning authorities should consider the importance of conserving, or enhancing, aspects of the historic environment, within the planning process. It requires an applicant for planning consent to provide, as part of any application, sufficient information to enable the local 1 planning authority to assess the significance of any heritage assets that may be affected by the proposal. The Historic Environment is defined (NPPF 2012, 52) as: ‘All aspects of the environment resulting from the interaction between people and places through time, including all surviving physical remains of past human activity, whether visible, buried or submerged, and landscaped and planted or managed flora.’ Paragraphs 128 and 129 state that ‘128. In determining applications, local planning authorities should require an applicant to describe the significance of any heritage assets affected, including any contribution made by their setting. The level of detail should be proportionate to the assets’ importance and no more than is sufficient to understand the potential impact of the proposal on their significance. As a minimum the relevant historic environment record should have been consulted and the heritage assets assessed using appropriate expertise where necessary. Where a site on which development is proposed includes or has the potential to include heritage assets with archaeological interest, local planning authorities should require developers to submit an appropriate desk-based assessment and, where necessary, a field evaluation. ‘129. Local planning authorities should identify and assess the particular significance of any heritage asset that may be affected by a proposal (including by development affecting the setting of a heritage asset) taking account of the available evidence and any necessary expertise. They should take this assessment into account when considering the impact of a proposal on a heritage asset, to avoid or minimise conflict between the heritage asset’s conservation and any aspect of the proposal.’ A ‘heritage asset’ is defined (NPPF 2012, 52) as ‘A building, monument, site, place, area or landscape identified as having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions, because of its heritage interest. Heritage asset includes designated heritage assets and assets identified by the local planning authority (including local listing).’ ‘Designated heritage asset’ includes (NPPF 2012, 51) any ‘World Heritage Site, Scheduled Monument, Listed Building, Protected Wreck Site, Registered Park and Garden, Registered Battlefield or Conservation Area designated under the relevant legislation.’ ‘Archaeological interest’ is glossed (NPPF 2012, 50) as follows: ‘There will be archaeological interest in a heritage asset if it holds, or potentially may hold, evidence of past human activity worthy of expert investigation at some point. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.’ Specific guidance on assessing significance and the impact of the proposal is contained in paragraphs 131 to 135: ‘131. In determining planning applications, local planning authorities should take account of: • the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the significance of heritage assets and putting them to viable uses consistent with their conservation; • the positive contribution that conservation of heritage assets can make to sustainable communities including their economic vitality; and • the desirability of new development making a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness. ‘132. When considering the impact of a proposed development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should be given to the asset’s conservation. The more important the asset, the greater the weight should be. Significance can be harmed or lost through alteration or destruction of the heritage asset or development within its setting. As heritage assets are irreplaceable, any harm or loss should require clear and convincing justification. Substantial harm to or loss of a grade II listed building, park or garden should be exceptional. Substantial harm to or 2 loss of designated heritage assets of the highest significance, notably scheduled monuments, protected wreck sites, battlefields, grade I and II* listed buildings, grade I and II* registered parks and gardens, and World Heritage Sites, should be wholly exceptional. ‘133. Where a proposed development will lead to substantial harm to or total loss of significance of a designated heritage asset, local planning authorities should refuse consent, unless it can be demonstrated that the substantial harm or loss is necessary to achieve substantial public benefits that outweigh that harm or loss, or all of the following apply: • the nature of the heritage asset prevents all reasonable uses of the site; and • no viable use of the heritage asset itself can be found in the medium term through appropriate marketing that will enable its conservation; and • conservation by grant-funding or some form of charitable or public ownership is demonstrably not possible; and • the harm or loss is outweighed by the benefit of bringing the site back into use. ‘134. Where a development proposal will lead to less than substantial harm to the significance of a designated heritage asset, this harm should be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal, including securing its optimum viable use. ‘135. The effect of an application on the significance of a non-designated heritage asset should be taken into account in determining the application. In weighing applications that affect directly or indirectly non
Recommended publications
  • Randall's Field, Pyrford, Woking, Gu22 8Sf Updated
    BDL 7 . RANDALL’S FIELD, PYRFORD, WOKING, GU22 8SF UPDATED HERITAGE ASSESSMENT Prepared on behalf of Burhill Developments Ltd 12 December 2018 RANDALL’S FIELD, PYRFORD, WOKING, GU228SF. HERITAGE ASSESSMENT Contents Executive Summary Acknowledgements 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY 3. NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND POLICY 4. LOCAL POLICY FRAMEWORK AND RELATED DOCUMENTS 5. ARCHAEOLOGY 6. BUILT ENVIRONMENT 7. HISTORIC LANDSCAPE 8. IMPACT AND POTENTIAL MITIGATION 9. CONCLUSIONS 10. REFERENCES Figures 1. Location Plan 2. Standing Stone, close to Upshot Lane 3. Photographic image processed to highlight the Christian cross 4. Aviary Road looking west from Sandy Lane 5. Aviary Road looking south from Engliff Lane showing later 20th century garden-plot infilling 6. Pyrford looking north from St Nicholas’ Churchyard 7. A Map of Surrey, Roque, 1768 8. Surrey Tithe Map 1836 9. Ordnance Survey 1881 10. Ordnance Survey 1915 11. Ordnance Survey 1935 12. North-facing elevation of Stone Farm House 13. Entrance to Pyrford Common Road at Pyrford Court stable block 14. St Nicholas’ churchyard looking north 15. Pyrford Centre looking south-east Randall’s Field and land east of Upshot Lane, Pyrford, Woking, GU22 8SF. Updated Heritage Assessment 1 Appendices 1. National Heritage Designations & Conservation Areas 2. Surrey County Council Historic Environment Record Data 3. Historic England list descriptions Randall’s Field and land east of Upshot Lane, Pyrford, Woking, GU22 8SF. Updated Heritage Assessment 2 Executive Summary The report has been prepared in the context of Woking Borough Council’s Site Allocation Development Plan Document and supports a response under the Regulation 19 consultation relating to the removal of Randall’s Field, Pyrford from the proposed DPD (referred to there as GB11).
    [Show full text]
  • Fishers Farm
    1 Fishers Farm Listing The house is Grade II * listed, the description being as follows: House. C15 with C17 extensions to the rear, late C18 front. Timber framed core, brick cladding, red brick to the rear, yellow to front; plain tiled hipped roofs with centre ridge stack to front and large diagonal stacks with moulded tops to the rear. Main front with 2 rear wings at right angles with lobby entrance. 2 storeys, brick hand over ground floor and to base of parapet, quoined angles. 5 bays to front, glazing bar sash windows under gauged camber heads; blocked window on red brick surround with cill brackets to first floor centre. Central six panelled door, with traceried fanlight in a surround of Doric half columns supporting an open pediment. C19 single storey weatherboard addition to the right. Rear: two wings connected by arched entrance screen wall, brick bands over the ground floor. Interior: Extensive framing of substantial scantling exposed in left wing, deep brick fireplaces with wooden lintels. Fine Jacobean style staircase with turned balusters, scroll spiked newel posts and SS carving to underside of staircase arch 2 Period The listing suggests the date of the first build as being in the 15th century which would place the original house in the Medieval period. The front certainly looks to be an added 18th century one. Assuming the 15th century date to be correct, one would expect to find a hipped roof see photograph above with flatways rafters and/or flat joists plus jowled posts. Although the reported earliest known date of 1527 is in the Tudor period, there is no reason why the house should not be earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • THE START of the NECROPLOLIS Iain Wakeford 2015
    ast January, in these articles, I started to look at the history of Woking in a way that most local history newspaper columns don’t (or cannot) now do. I wanted to get away from the normal superficial ‘peep’ into history and look a bit deeper at some L of the facts. For over thirty years I have been writing books and booklets about the history and heritage of Woking, so rather than just cobble together readers’ reminiscences’, I wanted to give my column some structure – to tell a more complete history of Woking (if a subject such as history can ever be complete). Starting with the geology and geography, I moved slowly onto the prehistoric before tackling the history of the area from the ‘Dark Ages’ onwards in an almost chronological order. Arthur Locke followed a similar approach many years ago, with readers cutting out and keeping his series of articles on ‘Woking Past’. At the end of last year we reached the 1840’s and 50’s and as well as looking at local chapels and schools, I touched upon the London Necropolis Company and Brookwood Cemetery (now owned by Woking Council). Over the next few months (if not years) I intend to tackle the subject of Woking ‘Past and Present’ in even more detail, beginning this week with a more detailed look at the Necropolis and why it came to Woking. THE START OF THE NECROPLOLIS Iain Wakeford 2015 The original plan for a cemetery on the whole of Woking n the first half of the 19th century the Common used Woking Station with private halts and But these new cemeteries themselves only had population of London had increased from chapels along the main line.
    [Show full text]
  • The Resident Free! Published and Distributed by Volunteers to the 4,200 Households of Horsell
    The magazine of Horsell Residents’ Association The Resident Free! Published and distributed by volunteers to the 4,200 households of Horsell Winter 2012 Inside this issue Woking High exhibits at RHS Wisley Beavers walk custard at Bazzaz www.Horsellresidents.com Blog: http://horsellresident.wordpress.com Pedal4Charity Twitter: http://twitter.com/Horsellresident fundraiser review Benstead’s Garage in the snow. Photo copyright John Worgan The Resident A word from the Editor Published by HORSELL RESIDENTS’ ASSOCIATION LTD Welcome to the Winter edition. As always there is plenty happening in the village and lots of new initiatives being suggested. The Second Thursday Club has a round-up Magazine team: of diverse on-going and possible future projects on pages 4-5, so do get in touch to Editor: Linda Banks – express your views or lend a hand. email: [email protected] We are spreading a little goodwill in this festive issue, with our Christmas Competition Ann Harington – Tel. 761624 on page 10 and a chance to win £20. Send your entries in by 17th December. Peter Hobbs – Tel. 824069 This is your magazine, representing your community, so tell us what you want featured, Dorothy Smith – Tel. 836031 or even better send in an article or photograph relating to Horsell or your local group Janice Worgan and its activities. Please email comments, articles, letters With warm wishes for Christmas and the New Year, or Horsell photos to: [email protected] Linda Published by Horsell Residents’ Association Linda’s Email: [email protected] Limited. A non-profit company limited by guarantee. Registered number 5377490.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazing-Facts-About-The-Queen.Pdf
    Thank You So Much and Welcome Thank you so much choosing this lovely book about the Queen. Part of the proceeds will go towards helping people in Africa and other 3rd world countries with pressing health issues. I have been a Nurse for 50 years and have always been very grateful for excellent health and our very good health services. Others are not so lucky! I sincerely hope that you enjoy reading some amazing and unusual facts about the Queen 1 Table of Contents Early Years……………………..……………...……………………………… Page 7 The Queens First Home ………..………………….……………………………... Page 9 Never went to school ….................................................................................. Page 11 A Royal romance............................................................................................ Page 15 Married in Westminster Abbey..................................................................... Page 19 Engagement ring.......................................................................................... Page 18 The wedding …................................................................................................ Page 19 Eight bridesmaids.......................................................................................... Page 20 The Queen's wedding dress …......................................................................... Page 22 Wedding gifts........................................................................................................ Page 22 Honeymoon..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE COMING of the RAILWAY Iain Wakeford 2014
    THE COMING OF THE RAILWAY Iain Wakeford 2014 n 6th October 1830 about 15-20 people attended a meeting at the home of O Southampton’s M.P., Mr Abel Rous Dottin, to discuss the idea of building a railway to London. The idea of linking the two ports was not new (several canal schemes had previously been discussed), but this ambitious scheme for a railway to the capital, and a branch line to Bath and Bristol, caught the imagination and £400 was quickly raised for expenses to look further into the idea. An article in the Hampshire Advertiser reported the meeting and two weeks later the prospectus for the Southampton, London and Branch Railway Company was published. A survey of the line was carried out by a local man called John Doswell Doswell who proposed that the line should cross the Thames between Weybridge and Chertsey and that the London terminus should be somewhere near Paddington! In the end, however, a rival scheme for a line to Bath and Bristol used that area as it’s London station and the London & Southampton Railway (as it was then named) chose Nine Elms at Vauxhall for its terminus in the capital. had recently been involved in the construction carry all this freight and passenger traffic Nine Elms was proposed by Francis Giles, a of railways - notably the Newcastle to Carlisle Henderson estimated that only five engines consultant engineer and pupil of John Rennie Railway. would be required, three for freight and two for passengers, making just two journeys to who had previously worked in the area on the On 26th February 1831 a meeting to promote plans for the Wey & Arun Junction Canal, the London a day.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERVIEW with JACK HAYWARD Recreation April 2012 V3
    A History based on an interview in 1969 with The Founder of Windlesham Camera Club J. C. HAYWARD This version was produced for presentation to The Mayor of Surrey Heath, Councillor Beverley Harding on the occasion of her attendance at Windlesham and Camberley Camera Club’s Finals Night on 29th May 2013 at St. Paul’s Church, Camberley The notes that follow originate from an audio recording made by Dennis Stevenson we believe in 1969 during which he interviewed the founder of Windlesham Camera Club, Mr. J. (Jack) C. Hayward. The original reel-to-reel tape was copied to compact cassette and transcribed by a stenographer at Shell Centre in London sometime in the 1980s while Alan Meeks worked there. The only existing typed copy was, in May 2009, scanned and converted into a Microsoft Word® file for archiving. Spelling of names may, in some cases, be incorrect due to phonetic transcription. Bold italic text represents the stenographer’s marking of Dennis Stevenson’s comments. Dennis Stevenson with Derek Fulk (who may well have carried out the actual tape recording). Photo taken in 1985 Founding of the club and its first meeting as reported in Windlesham Parish Magazine (Courtesy of The Late John Jillings) In this 1938 picture Windlesham Camera Club’s Secretary, J. C. HAYWARD is shown third from right at Hall Grove. Picture presented by John Hayward, his Son, in April 2010 Script from back of photograph WINDLESHAM CAMERA CLUB J. (Jack) C. Hayward in conversation with A. D. (Dennis) Stevenson J. Hayward “This is an introduction and I'll just read it from this paragraph in this article that was published in 1939 in "Photoworld", a paper that went ‘phut’ because of the war.” "Loneliness brought about the formation of the Windlesham Camera Club, a village organisation with headquarters at Bagshot, Surrey".
    [Show full text]
  • Pathescope 9.5Mm Sound
    9.5 mm SOUND & SILENT FILM CATALOGUE A Comparison of your 9.51;, Picture Area o o o a p o D o z D Q J O o in o o i a o o o o a o o z o o s o 35 mm 16 mm 9.S mm • mm The advantage of the centre sprocket hole needs no emphasis for obviously your 9.5 mm. film has the greatest picture area pro rata to its width and film wastage is negligible. The film transmission is even and smooth as projector claws and sprockets engage in the centre perforations of the film. Scanned from the collection of Karl Thiede Coordinated by the Media History Digital Library www.mediahistoryproject.org Funded by a donation from David Pierce Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from IVIedia History Digital Library http://www.archive.org/details/pathescope95mmso02path FILM CATALOGUE 9.5 mm SILENT 9.5 mm SOUND 1956 — 1957 (FIRST EDITION) PRICE 2/6 L 1 M I T E D NORTH CIRCULAR ROAD, LONDON, N.W.2 PRICES OPERATING NOVEMBER 1st 1956 L/ before a number (e.g. L/30125) denotes a SO ft. Film Price - 5s. 6d. D/ before a number (e.g. D/IO^^S) denotes a 60 ft Film Price - 10s, 6d. R/ before a number (e.g. R/30527) denotes a 75 ft. Film Special Price C/ before a number (e.g. C/ 30601) denotes a 100 ft. Film Price - £1 Is. Od. M/ before a number (e.g. M/S017S) denotes a 200 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Goldev Woking South of Kingfield Road and East of Westfield Avenue Woking FC
    Goldev Woking South of Kingfield Road and East of Westfield Avenue Woking FC April 2021 Proof of Evidence Ian Southwell vectos.co.uk ii Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Policy ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 Woking Borough Council ..................................................................................................................................... 13 4 Rule 6 Objections .................................................................................................................................................. 29 5 Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 32 Figures Figure IS1 - Car / Van Availability in Households According to Dwelling Type and Size Figure IS2 - Park and Stride Car Park Locations Figure IS3 - Distribution of Supporter Car Trips Figure IS4 - Parking Beat Survey Location Plan Figure IS5 - Existing Car Parking Restrictions on Streets Around the Stadium Figure IS6 - Streets with Greatest Increase in Match Day On-Street Parking Demand Appendices Appendix IS1 - Medical Centre Opening Hours in Woking Appendix IS2 - Proposed Stadium Parking Layout Appendix IS3 - TROs Implemented Around Other
    [Show full text]
  • The Brazen Nose
    The Brazen Nose Volume 52 2017-2018 The Brazen Nose 2017–2018 Printed by: The Holywell Press Limited, www.holywellpress.com CONTENTS Records Articles Editor’s Notes ..................................5 Professor Nicholas Kurti: Senior Members ...............................8 An Appreciaton by John Bowers QC, Class Lists .......................................18 Principal ..........................................88 Graduate Degrees...........................23 E S Radcliffe 1798 by Matriculations ................................28 Dr Llewelyn Morgan .........................91 College Prizes ................................32 The Greenland Library Opening Elections to Scholarships and Speech by Philip Pullman .................95 Exhibitions.....................................36 The Greenland Library Opening College Blues .................................42 Speech by John Bowers QC, Principal ..........................................98 Reports BNC Sixty-Five Years On JCR Report ...................................44 by Dr Carole Bourne-Taylor ............100 HCR Report .................................46 A Response to John Weeks’ Careers Report ..............................51 Fifty Years Ago in Vol. 51 Library and Archives Report .........52 by Brian Cook ...............................101 Presentations to the Library ...........56 Memories of BNC by Brian Judd 3...10 Chapel Report ...............................60 Paper Cuts: A Memoir by Music Report .................................64 Stephen Bernard: A Review The King’s Hall Trust for
    [Show full text]
  • 65190- Egley Road, Woking.Pdf
    Wessex Archaeology Land West of Egley Road, Woking, Surrey Archaeological Desk-based Assessment Ref: 65190.01 March 2007 LAND WEST OF EGLEY ROAD, WOKING, SURREY Archaeological Desk-based Assessment Prepared for Lennon Planning Ltd 4 King Street Lane Winnersh Berkshire RG41 5AS On behalf of William Bocking by Wessex Archaeology Unit 113 The Chandlery 50 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7QY Report reference: 65190 March 2007 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2007 all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Lennon Planning Ltd. Egley Road, Woking, Surrey LAND WEST OF EGLEY ROAD, WOKING, SURREY Archaeological Desk-based Assessment Contents Summary Acknowledgements 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background ........................................................................................ 1 1.2 Landscape and Geology................................................................................. 1 1.3 Historic Landscape Characterisation………………………………………………1 2 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................2 2.1 Scope ............................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Research ........................................................................................................ 2 2.3 Legislative and Planning Background ............................................................. 4 2.4 3 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Woking Park Bowls Club 1914 2014 Centenary Year 2014 HISTORY OF
    Woking Park Bowls Club 1914 2014 Centenary year 2014 HISTORY OF WOKING PARK BOWLS CLUB President : Brian Harris Woking Park Bowls Club A short history of the bowls club has been compiled from various council docu- ments, local newspapers, club minutes of meetings as well as memories from for- mer and current members. Contents 1 The First 25 Years 1914-1938 Page 3 2 1939-1963 Page 8 3 1964-1988 Page 12 4 1989-2005 Page 18 5 Gallery Page 21 6 Woking Park Ladies Page 22 7 Gallery Page 25 8 Founder Members Page 26 9 Club Honours Page 26 10 Past Presidents Page 28 11 Local Clubs Page 29 2 History of Woking Bowls Club The First 25 Years 1914-1938 It was in May 1913 that the Recreation committee of the then Woking Urban District Council decided to reserve land near the Recreation Ground Caretakers cottage for a bowling green. Work started on levelling the ground in June of that year. By January 1914 the green was almost complete and would be ready for play during that sum- mer. A contemporary description of the newly constructed green, given in the News & Mail, stated that it was an important addition to the town from a sporting point of view and had been prepared under the supervision of Mr G.T.Wooldridge. The grass grown from seed was in excellent condition and located in an ideal spot. Around the green ran a path, splendidly made, and at slight cost from small marble slabs formerly used in the Tivoli Music Hall , London .
    [Show full text]