[2011] NNTTA 107 (17 June 2011)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

[2011] NNTTA 107 (17 June 2011) NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd/ Ned Cheedy and Others on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People/ Western Australia, [2011] NNTTA 107 (17 June 2011) Application No: WF10/19 IN THE MATTER of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) - and - IN THE MATTER of an inquiry into a future act determination application FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd (grantee party/applicant) - and - Ned Cheedy and Others on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People WC03/3 (Yindjibarndi native title party) -and- Maitland Parker and Others on behalf of the Martu Idja Banyjima People WC98/62 (Martu Idja Banyjima native title party) - and - The State of Western Australia (Government party) FUTURE ACT DETERMINATION Tribunal: Daniel O‟Dea, Member Place: Perth Date: 9 July 2011 2 CORRIGENDUM REASONS FOR DECISION ON WHETHER THE TRIBUNAL HAS POWER TO CODUCT AN INQUIRY Background [1] The determination of the Tribunal in this matter was made on 17 June 2011. At [114], the Tribunal determined that E47/1398 and E47/1399 may be granted subject to, inter alia, the extra conditions which had been proposed by the State (see paragraph 44). The third of those conditions read as follows: iii. Where the grantee party submits to the State Mining Engineer a proposal to undertake developmental/productive mining or construction activity, the grantee party must give to the native title party a copy of the proposal, excluding sensitive commercial data, and a plan showing the location of the proposed mining operations and related infrastructure, including proposed access routes. [2] The Tribunal further determined that M47/1431 may be done subject to conditions proposed by the State including inter alia, the extra conditions, which had been proposed by the State. The third of those conditions read as follows: iii. Where, prior to commencing any development or productive mining or construction activity, the grantee party submits a plan of proposed operations and measures to safe guard the environment or any addendums thereafter to the Director of Environment at the Department of Mines and Petroleum for his assessment and written approval; the grantee party must at the same time give to the native title party a copy of the proposal or addendums, excluding sensitive commercial data, and a plan showing the location of the proposed mining operations and related infrastructure, including proposed access routes. [3] On 1 July 2011 a solicitor from the State Solicitor‟s Office wrote to the Tribunal indicating that there was a difficulty with the condition imposed in [114] in that the „State Mining Engineer‟ no longer existed. Consequently the condition imposed for the benefit of the native title party might not be able to take proper or full effect. The letter of the State Solicitor‟s Office accepted that the discrepancy in the wording between that contained in 114(iii) and 115(iii) arose as a result of an oversight by the Government party in providing the wording to the Tribunal. The State suggests the determination of the Tribunal be amended to delete the condition at 114(iii) and replace it with a condition identical to that at 115(iii). The State maintains that the change of wording would not affect the substance of that condition (4). On 1 July 2011, in response to the letter received from the State 3 Solicitor‟s Office, the Tribunal sought the views of the native title party and grantee party requesting them to provide their views on whether it was appropriate to amend the condition as proposed by the State by 4 July. On 7 July the grantee party wrote to the Tribunal indicated that it agreed to the proposed correction requested by the Government party. Despite repeated attempts to elicit a response from the native title party, no response has been received. In my opinion, the proposed correction does not alter the substance of the condition, remove any doubt that the condition will operate to the benefit of the native title party and can be simply achieved by substituting paragraph 115(iii) for 114(iii). Decision [4] The decision in application WF10/19 made by the Tribunal on 17 June 2011 and cited as FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd/Ned Cheedy and Ors on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People/Western Australia [2011] NNTTA 107 be amended so that the extra condition referred to in paragraph 114(iii) is deleted and replace with a condition identical to that at paragraph 115(iii) Daniel O‟Dea Member 11 July 2011 1 NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd/ Ned Cheedy and Others on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People/ Western Australia, [2011] NNTTA 107 (17 June 2011) Application No: WF10/19 IN THE MATTER of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) - and - IN THE MATTER of an inquiry into a future act determination application FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd (grantee party/applicant) - and - Ned Cheedy and Others on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People WC03/3 (Yindjibarndi native title party) -and- Maitland Parker and Others on behalf of the Martu Idja Banyjima People WC98/62 (Martu Idja Banyjima native title party) - and - The State of Western Australia (Government party) FUTURE ACT DETERMINATION Tribunal: Daniel O‟Dea, Member Place: Perth Date: 17 June 2011 Catchwords: Native title – future acts – application for determination for the grant of a mining lease –applications for determination for the grant of exploration licences – negotiation in good faith – authorisation of the native title party – length of negotiation period – conduct subsequent to bringing of determination application – grantee party negotiated in good faith – s 39 criteria considered – effect on registered native title rights and interests – effect of acts on sites or areas of particular significance – interests, proposals, opinions or wishes of native title party – economic or other significance of acts – public interest in doing of acts – any other matters the Tribunal considered relevant – determination that the acts may be done subject to conditions. 2 Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 29, 30, 31, 35, 36, 38, 39, 62, 66, 109, 238, 253 Mining Act 1978 (WA) ss 63, 82, 84, 85 Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (WA) s 18 Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 (WA) Cases: Ankamuthi People v State of Queensland (2002) 121 FCR 68; [2002] FCA 897 Australian Manganese Pty Ltd v State of Western Australia (2008) 218 FLR 387; [2008] NNTTA 38 Butchulla People v State of Queensland (2006) 154 FCR 233; [2006] FCA 1063 Cheedy obh Yindjibarndi People v State of Western Australia [2010] FCA 690 Cheinmora v Striker Resources NL and Others (1996) 142 ALR 21; [1996] FCA 1147 Daniel v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 666 Doxford, Re [2003] QLRT 58 FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd/Ned Cheedy and Others on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People/Western Australia [2009] NNTTA 38 FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd/Flinders Mines Limited/Wintawari Guruma Aboriginal Corporation/Western Australia [2009] NNTTA 69 FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd/ Ned Cheedy and Others on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People/ Western Australia [2009] NNTTA 91 FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd v Cox (2009) 175 FCR 141; (2009) 255 ALR 229; [2009] FCAFC 49 Gulliver Productions Pty Ltd v Western Desert Lands Aboriginal Corp (2005) 196 FLR 52; [2005] NNTTA 88 Johnson on behalf of the Barkandji (Paakantyi) People v Minister for Land and Water Conservation (NSW) [2003] FCA 981 Minister for Mines (WA) v Evans on behalf of the Koara People & Sons of Gwalia Ltd (1998) 163 FLR 274 Mt Gingee Munjie Resources Pty Ltd v State of Victoria (2003) 182 FLR 375; [2003] NNTTA 125 Ned Cheedy and Others on behalf of Yindjibarndi People 1/FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd/Western Australia [2011] NNTTA 30 3 Placer (Granny Smith) Pty Ltd v Western Australia (1999) 163 FLR 87 Roe v Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corp [2010] FCA 809 Tigan v State of Western Australia (2010) 188 FCR 533; [2010] FCA 993 Townson Holdings Pty Ltd and Joseph Frank Anania/Ron Harrington-Smith & Ors on behalf of the Wongatha People; June Ashwin & Ors on behalf of the Wutha People/Western Australia [2003] NNTTA 82 Ward and Others v State of Western Australia and Another (1996) 69 FCR 208; (1996) 136 ALR 557; [196] FCA 1452 Western Australia v Taylor and Another (1996) 134 FLR 211; [1996] NNTTA 34 Western Australia v Daniel (2002) 172 FLR 168; [2002] NNTTA 230 Western Australia v Thomas (1996) 133 FLR 124; [1996] NNTTA 30 Western Australia v Ward (2000) 99 FCR 316; (2000) 170 ALR 159; [2000] FCA 191 Western Desert Lands Aboriginal Corporation v Western Australia and Another (2009) 232 FLR 169; (2009) 2 ARLR 214; [2009] NNTTA 49 WMC Resources v Evans (1999) 163 FLR 333; [1999] NNTTA 372 Hearing dates: n/a Representatives for the Yindjibarndi Mr George Irving, John Toohey Chambers native title party: Mr Simon Millman/Ms Kate House, Slater and Gordon Representatives for Mr Ken Green, Green Legal Pty Ltd the grantee party: Mr Sukhpal Singh, FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd Representatives for Mr Matthew Pudovskis and Simon Taylor, State Solicitor‟s Office the Government party: Ms Paola O‟Neill, Department of Mines and Petroleum 4 REASONS FOR DECISION ON WHETHER THE TRIBUNAL HAS POWER TO CODUCT AN INQUIRY Background [5] On the following dates, the State of Western Australia („the Government party‟) gave notice under s 29 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) („the Act‟/„NTA‟) of future acts, namely the grant of the following mining leases and exploration licences („the proposed tenements‟) under the Mining Act 1978 (WA) to FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd („the grantee party‟): 12 January 2005 – E47/1398 comprising 222.07 square kilometres located 63 kilometres south west of Marble Bar in the Shire of Ashburton; 18 January 2006 – E47/1399 comprising 215.65 square kilometres located 22 kilometres north west of Wittenoom in the Shire of Ashburton; and 26 August 2009 – M47/1431 comprising 2964.66 hectares located 45 kilometres west of Wittenoom in the Shire of Ashburton.
Recommended publications
  • Contents What’S New
    September / October, No. 5/2011 CONTENTS WHAT’S NEW Two Suggestions About How To Make Cultural Heritage Win a free registration to the Materials Available .................................................................... 2 2012 Native Title Conference! Workshop Series: Thresholds for Traditional Owner Settlements in Victoria .............................................................. 4 Just take 5 minutes to complete our publications survey and you will go into the Foundations of the Kimberley Aboriginal Caring for Country Plan — Bungarun and the Kimberley Aboriginal Reference draw to win a free registration to the 2012 Group .......................................................................................... 5 Native Title Conference. The winner will be announced in January, 2012. ‘Anthropologies of Change: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges’ Workshop .............................................................. 8 CLICK HERE TO COMPLETE THE From Mississippi to Broome – Creating Transformative SURVEY Indigenous Economic Opportunity ........................................ 10 What’s New ............................................................................... 11 If you have any questions or concerns, please Native Title Publications ......................................................... 19 contact Matt O’Rourke at the Native Title Research Unit on (02) 6246 1158 or Native Title in the News ........................................................... 19 [email protected] Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUAs)
    [Show full text]
  • Warlu Way Drive Trail
    Experience Western Australia’s dramatic NORTH WEST OUTBACK North West with the Warlu Way Drive Trail. DRIVE TRAIL SAFETY & TRAVEL TIPS BusH FIRES: Due to the sheer isolation of the Northwest, it is possible for bush fires to rage for several days before it is The Warlu Way experience promises to offer an adventure noticed and brought under control. The lighting of fires is that will change you forever. Careful planning and extremely dangerous, care should be taken at all times and a consideration of the extreme conditions that make the North campfire should never be left unattended. WARLU West of Western Australia extraordinary will ensure these experiences are dramatic for all the right reasons. WANDERING ANIMals & STOCK: Many stations From sun up to sun and farms are unfenced and it’s not uncommon to encounter Some roads may need a permit before commencing your wandering stock and wildlife, serious accidents can occur due down, 2480km of natural drive – check with the Visitor Centre before embarking to collisions with kangaroos, cows and various other animals. on your journey. heritage to explore. Take particular care when travelling at dawn and dusk as ROAD SAFETY: It’s essential to carefully plan your trip these are the most dangerous times. Slow down, keep a before hitting the road beginning by purchasing a detailed lookout, and if possible, avoid driving at night. road map. As many of the towns are remote, if you find yourself in trouble, assistance could be many hours away. Be aware of TIDES: Australia’s North West has the second largest the limits of your vehicle and take your time while travelling.
    [Show full text]
  • What's New in Native Title September 2015
    WHAT’S NEW IN NATIVE TITLE September 2015 1. Case Summaries _______________________________________________ 1 2. Legislation ___________________________________________________ 12 3. Native Title Determinations ______________________________________ 13 4. Registered Native Title Bodies Corporate & Prescribed Bodies Corporate __ 13 5. Indigenous Land Use Agreements _________________________________ 15 6. Future Acts Determinations ______________________________________ 15 7. Native Title in the News _________________________________________ 17 8. Related Publications ___________________________________________ 17 9. Training and Professional Development Opportunities _________________ 20 10. Events ______________________________________________________ 22 1. Case Summaries Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia [2015] FCA 939 1 September 2015, Consent Determination, Federal Court of Australia- Perry Flats, Kooline Station, Western Australia, McKerracher J In this decision, McKerracher J recognised the native title rights and interests of the Jurruru people in relation to land and waters covering approximately 10,066 square kilometres in the Ashburton area north east of Carnarvon in the Pilbara region. The claim was first filed on 14 July 2000 but has been substantially amended twice, including the replacement of the applicant on 16 January 2012. The respondent parties included the state of Western Australia, Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation, Bambi, Cheela Plains Pastoral Co, as well as a number of individual
    [Show full text]
  • 1 NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd And
    NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd and Another v Yindjibarndi #1 [2014] NNTTA 79 (31 July 2014) Application Nos: WF2013/0015-WF2013/0016 IN THE MATTER of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) - and - IN THE MATTER of an inquiry into future act determination applications FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd (grantee party) - and - Thomas Jacob, Stanley Warrie, Allum Cheedy, Kevin Guiness, Angus Mack, Michael Woodley, Joyce Hubert, Pansy Sambo, Jean Norman, Esther Pat, Judith Coppin and Masie Ingie on behalf of Yindjibarndi #1 (WC2003/003) (native title party) - and - The State of Western Australia (Government party) FUTURE ACT DETERMINATION Tribunal: Member Helen Shurven Place: Perth Date of decision: 31 July 2014 Hearing date: 25 March 2014 Grantee party Mr Kenneth Green, Green Legal Pty Ltd representatives: Ms Nerolie Nikolic, Fortescue Metals Group Ltd Native title party Mr George Irving, Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC representative: Government party Ms Rosanna Hill, State Solicitor’s Office representatives: Mr David Crabtree, Department of Mines and Petroleum Mr Jason Diss, Department of Mines and Petroleum Mr Dennis Jacobs, Department of Mines and Petroleum 1 Catchwords: Native title – future acts – no agreement with native title party – application for determination for the grant of mining leases – s 39 criteria considered – whether the future acts must not be done – whether the future acts may be done – whether the future acts can be done subject to conditions – determination that the acts may be done subject to conditions Legislation:
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2006–2007
    06 07 NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL CONTACT DETAILS Annual Report 2006–2007 Tribunal National Native Title PRINCIPAL REGISTRY (PERTH) SOUTH AUSTRALIA 4th Floor, Commonwealth Law Courts Building Level 10, Chesser House 1 Victoria Avenue 91 Grenfell Street Perth WA 6000 Adelaide SA 5000 GPO Box 9973, Perth WA 6848 GPO Box 9973, Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone: (08) 9268 7272 Telephone: (08) 8306 1230 Facsimile: (08) 9268 7299 Facsimile: (08) 8224 0939 NEW SOUTH WALES AND AUSTRALIAN VICTORIA AND TASMANIA CAPITAL TERRITORY Level 8 Level 25 310 King Street Annual Report 25 Bligh Street Melbourne Vic. 3000 Sydney NSW 2000 GPO Box 9973, Melbourne Vic. 3001 GPO Box 9973, Sydney NSW 2001 Telephone: (03) 9920 3000 2006–2007 Telephone: (02) 9235 6300 Facsimile: (03) 9606 0680 Facsimile: (02) 9233 5613 WESTERN AUSTRALIA NORTHERN TERRITORY 11th Floor, East Point Plaza 5th Floor, NT House 233 Adelaide Terrace 22 Mitchell Street Perth WA 6000 Darwin NT 0800 GPO Box 9973, Perth WA 6848 GPO Box 9973, Darwin NT 0801 Telephone: (08) 9268 9700 Telephone: (08) 8936 1600 Facsimile: (08) 9221 7158 Facsimile: (08) 8981 7982 NATIONAL FREECALL NUMBER 1800 640 501 QUEENSLAND Level 30 WEBSITE: www.nntt.gov.au 239 George Street Brisbane Qld 4000 National Native Title Tribunal office hours GPO Box 9973, Brisbane Qld 4001 8.30am – 5.00pm 8.00am – 4.30pm (Northern Territory) Telephone: (07) 3226 8200 Facsimile: (07) 3226 8235 The Tribunal welcomes feedback on whether this information was useful. QUEENSLANd – CAIRNS (REGIONAL OFFICE) Email Public Affairs with your comments Level 14, Cairns Corporate Tower and suggestions to [email protected] 15 Lake Street or telephone 08 9268 7495.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Remotefocus and Pilbara Aboriginal People 103
    remoteFOCUS The Challenge, Conversation, Commissioned Papers and Regional Studies of Remote Australia August 2012 Edited by: Dr Bruce Walker Commissioned Papers by: Dr Mary Edmunds Professor Ian Marsh An initiative facilitated by Desert Knowledge Australia and supported by: i This collection of reports has been edited by: Dr Bruce W Walker, remoteFOCUS Project Director With contributions by: Dr Mary Edmunds, Edmunds Consulting Pty Ltd Professor Ian Marsh, Adjunct Professor, Australian Innovation Research Centre, University of Tasmania The work is reviewed by the remoteFOCUS Reference Group: Hon Fred Chaney AO (Convenor) Dr Peter Shergold AC Mr Neil Westbury PSM Mr Bill Gray AM Mr John Huigen (CEO Desert Knowledge Australia) Any views expressed here are those of the individuals and the remoteFOCUS team and should not be taken as representing the views of their employers. Citation: Walker BW, (Ed) 2012 The Challenge, Conversation, Commissioned Papers and Regional Studies of Remote Australia, Desert Knowledge Australia, Alice Springs Copyright: Desert Knowledge Australia 2012 ISBN: 978-0-9873958-1-8 Associated Reports: Walker, BW, Edmunds, M and Marsh, I. 2012 Loyalty for Regions: Governance Reform in the Pilbara, report to the Pilbara Development Commission, Desert Knowledge Australia ISBN: 978-0-9873958-0-1 Walker, BW, Porter DJ, and Marsh, I. 2012 Fixing the Hole in Australia’s Heartland: How Government needs to work in remote Australia, Desert Knowledge Australia. ISBN: 978-0-9873958-2-5 ISBN Online: 978-0-9873958-3-2 Copyright: Desert Knowledge Australia 2012 Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike Licence For additional information please contact: Dr Bruce Walker Project Director | remoteFOCUS M: 0418 812 119 P: 08 8959 6125 E: [email protected] W: www.desertknowledge.com.au/Our-Programs/remoteFOCUS P: 08 8959 6000 E: [email protected] i remoteFOCUS The Challenge, Conversation, Commissioned Papers and Regional Studies of remote Australia The Challenge Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Many Words for Fire: an Etymological and Micromorphological Consideration of Combustion Features in Indigenous Archaeologicalsit
    I. A. K. WardJournal & D. of E. the Friesem: Royal CombustionSociety of Western features Australia, in Indigenous 104: 11–24, archaeological 2021 sites Many words for fire: an etymological and micromorphological consideration of combustion features in Indigenous archaeological sites of Western Australia INGRID AK WARD 1* & DAVID E FRIESEM 2, 3 1 School of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, Australia 2 Recanatti Institute for Marine Studies, Department of Maritime Civilizations, School of Marine Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel 3 Haifa Center for Mediterranean History, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The word ‘fire’ encompasses an enormous variety of human activities and has diverse cultural meanings. The word hearth not only has links with fire but also has a social focus both in its Latin origins and in Australian Indigenous languages, where hearth fire is primary to all other anthropogenic fires. The importance of fire to First Nations people is reflected in the rich vocabulary of associated words, from different hearth types and fuel to the different purposes of fire in relation to cooking, medicine, ritual or management of the environment. Likewise, the archaeological expression of hearths and other combustion features is equally complex and nuanced, and can be explored on a microscale using micromorphology. Here we highlight the complexity in both language and micromorphological expressions around a range of documented and less well documented combustion features, including examples from archaeological sites in Western Australia. Our purpose is to discourage the over-use of the generalised term ‘hearth’ to describe charcoal and ash-rich features, and encourage a more nuanced study of the burnt record in a cultural context.
    [Show full text]
  • Know the Song(PDF)
    THE NGARDANGARLI STORY OF CULTURE AND HISTORY IN NGARLUMA & YINDJIBARNDI COUNTRY KNOW THE SONG KNOW THE COUN TRY Some of the photographs that appear in this booklet are of people that have passed away. We thank the families of these dear ones for allowing us to keep them in the booklet. James Solomon (Malbaru) Ngarluma Elder Roger Solomon, (Yirra Bindiri) (with Ngarla/Nyamal relationship) Born at Ngarluma/Yindjibarndi elder Yagurru-nha (Old Woodbrook) Narrator/Co-Writer “Exile and The Kingdom” (Frank Rijavec) (Colin Beard) Yirra Bindiri was our inspiration. BurrupPeninsula This is what he stood for: “My home runs from tablelands to sea My people is what’s inside me My mission is to be free I am Yirra Bindiri” He stood against the change of times Stayed true to this heart of mine Walked among my strong beliefs In his father’s company Beautiful land, beautiful song Teach my people to walk as one ‘Cause someday I truly believe You and I will be free (Words by Migu Woodley 2001) Published by Juluwarlu Aboriginal Corporation PO Box 111 Roebourne, Western Australia 6718 Copyright © 2004 (2nd Edition) Juluwarlu Aboriginal Corporation & Frank RIJAVEC ISBN 1875946195 All Rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the publisher 1 Wimiya King, Yindjibarndi Elder Born at Thunggawarna (Carl von Brandenstein) NGURRA - Homelands MORNING STAR SONG* Our name for Roebourne is Yirramagardu. Many people think that Yirramagardu is home for our people. Well it might be today, but only a few Ngarluma lived here until the government started pushing us in off our homelands wirrwi ngardangarda yunurrula maji in the late 1940s.
    [Show full text]
  • 'We're a Dreaming Country'
    ‘We’re a Dreaming Country’ Guidelines for Interpretation of Aboriginal Heritage (2012) ‘We’re a Dreaming Country’ Guidelines for Interpretation of Aboriginal Heritage (2012) Disclaimer The information contained in this book is correct at the time of production, June 2011. Whilst it provides a general overview of Aboriginal heritage and matters related to interpretation of Aboriginal heritage, the information may not be factually, culturally or historically accurate for your location and local advice should always be sought. Warning for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are warned that this document may contain images of deceased persons. © National Trust of Australia (WA) People wishing to use any part of this document for purposes other than which it is intended must contact the National Trust of Australia (WA) for permission. Permission is granted for personal, non-commercial use or within your organisation. All other rights are reserved. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only, retaining this copyright notice. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the National Trust of Australia (WA). Any material included in this production identified as belonging to another body remains the copyright of that body. National Trust of Australia (WA) Postal: PO Box 1162 West Perth WA 6872 Street: The Old O bservatory, 4 Havelock St, West Perth WA 6005 Telephone: 61 8 9321 6088 Facsimile: 61 8 9324 1571 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.ntwa.com.au/ ISBN: 978-0-909259-01-3 Bibliography 1. Heritage 2. Aboriginal 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Tinto Responses to Questions on Notice Questions
    Inquiry into the destruction of 46,000 year old caves at the Juukan Gorge in the Pilbara region of Western Australia Submission 25 - Supplementary Submission Rio Tinto Responses to Questions on Notice Questions on Notice (hearing dated 7 August 2020) Question Transcript Response no 1 Senator CANAVAN: I just have a little bit of Financial benefits (as well as significant non-financial benefits) payable under the Binding time. I will ask you about that financial aspect. Initial Agreement executed on 28 June 2006 and the Participation Agreement executed on 18 You mentioned in your submission that under the March 2011 were made in exchange for consent by the PKKP to Rio Tinto’s operations on agreements the PKKP do receive financial PKKP land. benefits. Could you outline in detail what those The total financial benefits paid as of today to the PKKP under the Binding Initial Agreement benefits are? and Participation Agreement is [figure provided confidentially] Mr Jacques: If it's okay with you, I will take this The relevant clause of the Binding Initial Agreement is clause 8. It provided for payment of question on notice because I would need to have [detail provided confidentially] a conversation with the PKKP. The Binding Initial Agreement included provisions in relation to interest, how/where the payment were to be made, and auditing of the payment. The relevant part of the Participation Agreement is Part 3. Under the Participation Agreement, the PKKP are entitled to [detail provided confidentially] The Participation Agreement also includes provisions in respect of interest, how/where the payments were to be made, reporting and auditing.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Title Developments
    REVISIONS AND RESOLUTIONS MANY LAWS, ONE LAND AIATSIS NATIVE TITLE CONFERENCE – BROOME 2018 SUSAN PHILLIPS – NSW AND QUEENSLAND BARS INDIGENOUS ESTATE AREAS HELD UNDER NATIVE TITLE OR STATE AND TERRITORY LAND RIGHTS REGIMES ILUAS: MORE COMPLEX CHALLENGES • Filling in the gaps • Resolving overlapping claims • Compensation applications Aspects of these objectives may require: • Revising determinations THREE AREAS FOR REVISION Illusory Categories •Boundaries of claim area •Description of native title holders •Rights and Interests THE ACQUIRED RIGIDITY OF BORDERS EXAMPLE OF DETERMINATION AREAS DEFINED BY PROPERTY BOUNDARIES NOT CULTURAL BOUNDARIES • Excised area of Western Australia BARUNGA V STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA (NO 2) [2011] FCA 755 • Gilmour J at [182] – [183] • I accept, that any interests of one group that are asserted in the other application area are reciprocal such that a hard boundary is not an appropriate delineation between them. And certainly, in my opinion, there is evidence to support the view that the exercise of those rights may be the subject of negotiation. • The agreement reached on 9 October 1996 to which I have referred between the Dambimangari native title claim group and the Bardi Jawi precursors of the Mayala native title claim group, to the effect that members of the two groups who have customarily exercised rights in the other area will be recognised by the other claimant group as being entitled to continue to exercise those rights in the other area… LACK OF CONNECTION/COMMUNICATION BETWEEN CLAIMS ON BEHALF OF THE SAME GROUP INTERSECTED BY A BORDER • The determination affecting three interconnected groups in Dempsey on behalf of the Bularnu, Waluwarra and Wangkayujuru People v State of Queensland (No 2) [2014] FCA 528, (2014) 317 ALR 432 and the related • Lake Nash determination Samardin on behalf of the Ilperrelhelam, Malarrarr, Nwerrarr, Meyt, Itnwerrengayt and Ampwertety Landholding Groups v Northern Territory of Australia [2012] FCA 845.
    [Show full text]
  • Banjima People V State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 868
    FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Banjima People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 868 Citation: Banjima People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 868 Parties: BANJIMA PEOPLE v STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND ORS File number: WAD 6096 of 1998 Judge: BARKER J Date of judgment: 28 August 2013 Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – application for determination of native title – whether claimants constitute single group – whether claim area part of traditional country of claimants – whether claimants have maintained connection with claim area – whether claimants descendants of ancestors who had rights and interests in claim area – what native title rights and interests exist – what non-native title rights and interests exist – whether various acts extinguished native title rights and interests – extent of any extinguishment of native title rights and interests PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for confidentiality order under s 37AF Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether order necessary to prevent prejudice to proper administration of justice – whether order necessary to protect safety of persons Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 136 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 17, Pt VAA, s 37AE, s 37AF, s 37AG, s 37AG(1), s 37AG(1)(a) Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 13(1)(b), s 15(1)(a), s 15(1)(c), s 15(1)(d), s 19, s 23A(2), s 23B(2)(c)(i), s 23B(2)(c)(iii), s 23B(2)(c)(viii), s 23B(7), s 23B(9), s 23C(1), s 23C(2), s 23F, s 24HA, Pt 2 Div 3 Subdiv I, s 24IA(a), s 24IB, s 24IB(a), s 24IB(b), s 24ID(1), s 24ID(1)(a),
    [Show full text]