Research Article
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Investigating Interactions Between Phentermine, Dexfenfluramine, and 5-HT2C Agonists, on Food Intake in the Rat
Psychopharmacology DOI 10.1007/s00213-014-3829-2 ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Investigating interactions between phentermine, dexfenfluramine, and 5-HT2C agonists, on food intake in the rat Andrew J. Grottick & Kevin Whelan & Erin K. Sanabria & Dominic P. Behan & Michael Morgan & Carleton Sage Received: 2 October 2014 /Accepted: 20 November 2014 # The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Conclusions Dex-phen synergy in the rat is caused by a Rationale Synergistic or supra-additive interactions between pharmacokinetic interaction, resulting in increased central the anorectics (dex)fenfluramine and phentermine have been concentrations of phentermine. reported previously in the rat and in the clinic. Studies with 5- HT2C antagonists and 5-HT2C knockouts have demonstrated Keywords Synergy . BELVIQ® . Lorcaserin . Isobologram . dexfenfluramine hypophagia in the rodent to be mediated by Fen-phen actions at the 5-HT2C receptor. Given the recent FDA approv- al of the selective 5-HT2C agonist lorcaserin (BELVIQ®) for weight management, we investigated the interaction between Introduction phentermine and 5-HT2C agonists on food intake. Objectives This study aims to confirm dexfenfluramine- Fenfluramine (Pondimin) and dexfenfluramine (Redux) are phentermine (dex-phen) synergy in a rat food intake assay, anorectic agents which act to enhance serotonergic transmission to extend these findings to other 5-HT2C agonists, and to both through inhibition of 5-HT reuptake by the parent com- determine whether pharmacokinetic interactions could ex- pounds, and through their major circulating des-ethylated me- plain synergistic findings with particular drug combinations. tabolite, (dex)norfenfluramine, which is a 5-HT reuptake inhib- Methods Isobolographic analyses were performed in which itor, a 5-HT and noradrenaline releasing agent, and a potent phentermine was paired with either dexfenfluramine, the 5- agonist at postsynaptic 5-HT2 receptors (Curzon et al. -
Adipose Tissue As Pain Generator in the Lower Back and Lower Extremity
Lee et al. HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine (2020) 1:5 https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1102 Clinical Review Adipose Tissue as Pain Generator in the Lower Back and Lower Extremity: Application in Author affiliations are listed Musculoskeletal Medicine at the end of this article. Se Won Lee, MD ,1 Craig Van Dien, MD ,2 Sun Jae Won, MD, PhD3 Correspondence to: Se Won Lee, MD Abstract Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Description MoutainView Medical Adipose tissue (AT) has diverse and important functions in body insulation, mechanical protection, energy metabolism and the endocrine system. Despite its relative abundance in Center the human body, the clinical significance of AT in musculoskeletal (MSK) medicine, partic- 2880 N Tenaya Way, 2nd Fl, ularly its role in painful MSK conditions, is under-recognized. Pain associated with AT can Las Vegas, NV 89128 be divided into intrinsic (AT as a primary pain generator), extrinsic (AT as a secondary pain ([email protected]) generator) or mixed origin. Understanding AT as an MSK pain generator, both by mechanism and its specific role in pain generation by body region, enhances the clinical decision-making process and guides therapeutic strategies in patients with AT-related MSK disorders. This article reviews the existing literature of AT in the context of pain generation in the lower back and lower extremity to increase clinician awareness and stimulate further investigation into AT in MSK medicine. Keywords adipose tissue; fat pad; musculoskeletal pain; connective tissue; lipodystrophy; lipoma; obe- sity; lipedema; pain generator Introduction lower extremity, focusing on its pathogenic role Mounting evidence supports the various func- as a pain generator as well as practical diagno- tions of adipose tissue (AT), most notably its sis and management. -
AHJ Interview Catalog 7-1-13(9)
Interview Catalog Cross Referenced by Topic Revised 7/1/2020 * Super Segments (SS) TOPIC INTERVIEWEE (A) ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS: AAA – Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm………………………………………….Rama Thumati, MD Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms………………………………………………..Richard Doering, MD Diagnosis & Treatments…………………………………………………………..…...Wang Teng, MD Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms……………………………………………...Theodore Teruya, MD Aortic Aneurysms...............................................................Russell Montgomery, MD ACID REFLUX DISEASE (GERD): Acid Reflux in Children...................................................................Mitchell Katz, MD Acid Reflux Disease……………………………………………………………….….John De Banto, MD GERD Common Symptoms……………………………………………………..Sajen Mathews, MD Treatments Available for Acid Reflux Disease............................Sajen Mathews, MD Range of Treatments for GERDS.................................................Kenneth Chang, MD Prevention & Modern Treatments......................................Parminder Dhaliwal, MD Heartburn & Acid reflux………...............................................Christopher Hurley, MD 7/1/20 Page 1 ACL TEAR (ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT TEAR) ACL Tear/Injuries‐Female Atheletes Prevention....................John A. Schlechter, DO ACNE: Acne……………………………………………………………………………….Sharon Christopher, PA‐C Best Methods of Treating Acne.……………………………………………Gene Rubinstein, MD Flaxel Repair Laser (Part 1)………………………………………………………Michael Persky, MD Flaxel Laser/Recovery & Results (Part 2)………………………………….Michael Persky, MD ACUPUNCTURE: -
(19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist. -
Reflections on Contagious Off-Label Use of Phentermine and Fenfluramine
University of Massachusetts Medical School eScholarship@UMMS Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications Population and Quantitative Health Sciences 2008 Weighing in 10 Years Later: Reflections on Contagious Off-Label Use of Phentermine and Fenfluramine Regina C. Grebla Brown University Et al. Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp Part of the Bioinformatics Commons, Biostatistics Commons, Epidemiology Commons, and the Health Services Research Commons Repository Citation Grebla RC, Waring ME. (2008). Weighing in 10 Years Later: Reflections on Contagious Off-Label Use of Phentermine and Fenfluramine. Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/379 This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Looking Back, Learning Forward History doesn’t repeat itself -- at best it sometimes rhymes. Mark Twain Weighing in 10 years later: Reflections on Contagious off-label use of Phentermine and Fenfluramine Contributed by Regina C. Grebla, MGA, MPH PhD(c) Molly E. Waring AM PhD(c) Graduate students, Brown Medical School The piece for this edition of Scribe focuses on the phentermine and fenfluramine story. This edition comes to you from two students in my advanced pharmacoepidemiology course, shortened significantly to meet the needs of this column. I welcome contributions which stay true to the theme of reflecting and learning about past challenges in pharmacoepidemiology. Please forward ideas to : [email protected] . -
Methylphenidate Versus Dexamphetamine in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: a Double-Blind, Crossover Trial
Methylphenidate Versus Dexamphetamine in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Double-blind, Crossover Trial Daryl Efron, FRACP; Frederick Jarman, FRACP; and Melinda Barker, Grad Dip Ed Psych ABSTRACT. Objective. To compare methylphenidate behavioral, academic, and social functioning. Many (MPH) and dexamphetamine (DEX) in a sample of chil- well-designed, placebo-controlled studies have dem- dren with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder onstrated beyond doubt the benefits of stimulants in (ADHD). the vast majority of children with ADHD.2–4 In a Method. A total of 125 children with ADHD received review of 110 studies on the effects of stimulant both MPH (0.3 mg/kg twice daily) and DEX (0.15 mg/kg drugs on more than 4200 children with ADHD, twice daily) for 2 weeks a double-blind, crossover study. 4 ; Outcome measures were Conners’ Parent Rating Scale– Barkley found that 75% of subjects were regarded Revised, Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale–Revised, a Par- as improved on stimulants. The mean placebo re- ent Global Perceptions questionnaire, the Continuous sponse was 39%. Performance Test, and the Barkley Side Effects Rating Methylphenidate (MPH) and dexamphetamine Scale. (DEX) are the two stimulants prescribed most fre- Results. There were significant group mean im- quently and have been shown to have similar types provements from baseline score on all measures for of positive effects in children with ADHD. However, both stimulants. On the Conners’ Teacher Rating Scal- it is not known whether one is more efficacious than e–Revised, response was greater on MPH than DEX on the other in terms of probability of producing a the conduct problems and hyperactivity factors, as well positive response, magnitude of response, quality of as on the hyperactivity index. -
July 14, 2019 the Honorable Jan
July 14, 2019 The Honorable Jan Schakowsky 2367 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 Dear Representative Schakowsky: On behalf of University of Pennsylvania Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, I’m writing to inform you that we would like to offer our formal endorsement of the Lymphedema Treatment Act (S.518/H.R.1948). I am a practicing cancer physiatrist at Penn Medicine and frequently evaluate, diagnose, and manage lymphedema. Many of my patients have lymphedema as a result of cancer treatment, while others have lymphedema as a result of congenital lymphedema, Milroy’s disease, Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome, lipedema, organ transplantation, chronic venous insufficiency, or trauma. Despite the cause of lymphedema, the international standard of care for treatment includes lymphedema therapy and long term use of compression garments that at a minimum needs to be replaced every 6 months. Lymphedema is a life-long condition that requires ongoing medical management along with continuous compression. The current international standard of care for lymphedema requires use of appropriate compression on a 24-hour basis. Failure to provide adequate compression can lead to significant medical, psychological and functional morbidity. Specifically, patients are left vulnerable to worsening lymphedema, potentially life- threatening cellulitis infections, chronic pain and non-healing wounds. Unfortunately, Medicare currently does not cover these medically necessary compression garments, despite the evidence for the increase in morbidity and mortality associated with untreated lymphedema and the international standard of care to treat with 24-hour compression garments. Furthermore, many patients are unable to financially afford the costs of compression garments that can be several hundred dollars a year. -
Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs
Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • Public Health Service • Alcohol Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs Editors: Khursheed Asghar, Ph.D. Division of Preclinical Research National Institute on Drug Abuse Errol De Souza, Ph.D. Addiction Research Center National Institute on Drug Abuse NIDA Research Monograph 94 1989 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs ACKNOWLEDGMENT This monograph is based upon papers and discussion from a technical review on pharmacology and toxicology of amphetamine and related designer drugs that took place on August 2 through 4, 1988, in Bethesda, MD. The review meeting was sponsored by the Biomedical Branch, Division of Preclinical Research, and the Addiction Research Center, National Institute on Drug Abuse. COPYRIGHT STATUS The National Institute on Drug Abuse has obtained permission from the copyright holders to reproduce certain previously published material as noted in the text. Further reproduction of this copyrighted material is permitted only as part of a reprinting of the entire publication or chapter. For any other use, the copyright holder’s permission is required. All other matieral in this volume except quoted passages from copyrighted sources is in the public domain and may be used or reproduced without permission from the Institute or the authors. -
Amphetamine/Dextroamphetamine IR Generic
GEORGIA MEDICAID FEE-FOR-SERVICE STIMULANT AND RELATED AGENTS PA SUMMARY Preferred Non-Preferred Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine IR generic Adzenys ER (amphetamine ER oral suspension) Armodafinil generic Adzenys XR (amphetamine ER dispersible tab) Atomoxetine generic Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ER (generic Concerta (methylphenidate ER/SA) Adderall XR) Dextroamphetamine IR tablets generic Aptensio XR (methylphenidate ER) Focalin (dexmethylphenidate) Clonidine ER generic Focalin XR (dexmethylphenidate ER) Cotempla XR (methylphenidate ER disintegrating Guanfacine ER generic tablet) Methylin oral solution (methylphenidate) Daytrana (methylphenidate TD patch) Methylphenidate CD/CR/ER generic by Lannett Desoxyn (methamphetamine) [NDCs 00527-####-##] and Kremers Urban [NDCs Dexmethylphenidate IR generic 62175-####-##] (generic Metadate CD) Dexmethylphenidate ER generic Methylphenidate IR generic Dextroamphetamine ER capsules generic Modafinil generic Dextroamphetamine oral solution generic Quillichew ER (methylphenidate ER chew tabs) Dyanavel XR (amphetamine ER oral suspension) Quillivant XR (methylphenidate ER oral suspension) Evekeo (amphetamine tablets) Vyvanse (lisdexamfetamine) Methamphetamine generic Zenzedi 5 mg, 10 mg IR tablets (dextroamphetamine) Methylphenidate IR chewable tablets generic Methylphenidate ER/SA (generic Concerta) Methylphenidate ER/LA/SR (generic Ritalin LA, Ritalin SR, Metadate ER) Methylphenidate ER/SA 72 mg generic Methylphenidate oral solution generic Mydayis (amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ER) Ritalin LA 10 mg -
(Adhd) Quantity Limitation Utilization Management Criteria
ATTENTION- DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER (ADHD) QUANTITY LIMITATION UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT CRITERIA DRUG CLASS: Stimulants and Non-Stimulants BRAND (generic) NAMES: Adderall® (amphetamine/dextroamphetamine) Adderall XR® (amphetamine/ dextroamphetamine ER) Adzenys XR-ODTTM (amphetamine ER dispersible) Aptensio XR® (methylphenidate ER) Concerta® (methylphenidate ER) Daytrana® (methylphenidate transdermal patch) Dextroampthetamine (DextroStat®) Dexedrine® (dextroamphetamine ER) DyanavelTM XR (amphetamine ER) Focalin XR® (dexmethylphenidate ER) Focalin® (dexmethylphenidate) Intuniv® (guanfacine ER) Kapvay® (clonidine ER) Metadate CD® (methylphenidate ER) Metadate ER® (methylphenidate ER) Methylin® (methylphenidate) Procentra® (dextroamphetamine) QuillichewTM (methylphenidate ER) Quillivant XR® (methylphenidate ER) Ritalin® (methylphenidate) Ritalin® LA (methylphenidate ER) Ritalin® SR (methylphenidate ER) Strattera® (atomoxetine) Vyvanse® (lisdexamphetamine) Zenzedi® (dextroamphetamine) COVERAGE AUTHORIZATION CRITERIA Non-formulary medications - Medications included in this criterion that are not part of ASO Net Results or Essential Formularies are subject to a trial and failure of up to TWO formulary alternatives that are clinically appropriate, to treat the same condition, prior to approval (see Non-formulary Exception Criteria for detailed limitations). Quantities above the program set limit (see pgs 2-4) for ADHD agents will be approved when the following is met: 1. The quantity (dose) requested is for documented titration purposes at the initiation of therapy (authorization for a 90 day titration period); AND 2. The prescribed dose cannot be achieved using a lesser quantity of a higher strength; AND 3. The quantity (dose) requested does not exceed the maximum FDA labeled dose, when specified, or to the safest studied dose per the manufacturer’s product insert; OR BLUE CROSS®, BLUE SHIELD® and the Cross and Shield Symbols are registered marks of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, an association of independent Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans. -
Surgical Treatments for Lymphedema and Lipedema BACKGROUND
Name of Blue Advantage Policy: Surgical Treatments for Lymphedema and Lipedema Policy #:719 Latest Review Date: September 2020 Category: Medical/Surgical Policy Grade: B BACKGROUND: Blue Advantage medical policy does not conflict with Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs), Local Medical Review Policies (LMRPs) or National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) or with coverage provisions in Medicare manuals, instructions or operational policy letters. In order to be covered by Blue Advantage the service shall be reasonable and necessary under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, Section 1862(a)(1)(A). The service is considered reasonable and necessary if it is determined that the service is: 1. Safe and effective; 2. Not experimental or investigational*; 3. Appropriate, including duration and frequency that is considered appropriate for the service, in terms of whether it is: • Furnished in accordance with accepted standards of medical practice for the diagnosis or treatment of the patient’s condition or to improve the function of a malformed body member; • Furnished in a setting appropriate to the patient’s medical needs and condition; • Ordered and furnished by qualified personnel; • One that meets, but does not exceed, the patient’s medical need; and • At least as beneficial as an existing and available medically appropriate alternative. *Routine costs of qualifying clinical trial services with dates of service on or after September 19, 2000 which meet the requirements of the Clinical Trials NCD are considered reasonable and necessary by Medicare. Providers should bill Original Medicare for covered services that are related to clinical trials that meet Medicare requirements (Refer to Medicare National Coverage Determinations Manual, Chapter 1, Section 310 and Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 32, Sections 69.0-69.11). -
Lower Extremity Edema.Pdf
May 2019 ELDER CARE A Resource for Interprofessional Providers Lower Extremity Edema in Older Adults Oluwaseun O. Acquah, MD, Jennifer M. Vesely, MD, Teresa Quinn, MD, and Donald Pine, MD Family Medicine Residency, University of Minnesota Methodist Hospital Lower extremity edema is the accumulation of fluid in the Bilateral edema, which is more common in older adults, is lower legs, which may or may not include the feet (pedal often multifactorial and may reflect a systemic process. edema). It is typically caused by one of three mechanisms. Treating the underlying systemic cause can often lessen the edema. Table 1 lists common causes of bilateral lower The first is venous edema caused by increased capillary extremity edema. permeability, resulting in a fluid shift from the veins to the interstitial space. The fluid shift can be due to venous In addition to seeking evidence for these conditions, disease or systemic processes that cause the fluid shift. clinicians should be aware of certain clues in the patient’s presentation. In particular, if unilateral edema has an The second is lymphatic edema caused by obstruction or acute-onset (present for less than 72 hours), venous dysfunction of lymphatic outflow from the legs, resulting in thrombosis and infection should be considered as possible accumulation of protein-rich interstitial fluid. causes and steps should be taken to exclude those The third is from lipoedema, which is an accumulation of diagnoses. On the other hand, when edema is long- fluid in fat cells. These three mechanisms can operate standing and accompanied by a dull, aching pain, chronic independently or in combination.