Mimic Pollination in Ornamental Plants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mimic Pollination in Ornamental Plants Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(4): 2969-2974 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 8 Number 04 (2019) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Review Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.804.343 Mimic Pollination in Ornamental Plants A. Sankari*, P. Loganayki and M. Anand 1HC&RI, TNAU, India 2Depatment of Floriculture and Landscaping, TNAU, India 3HRS, Yercaud, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Pollination is the act of transferring pollen grains from the male anther of a K e yw or ds flower to the female stigma. Mimicry in plants is where a plant organism evolves to resemble another organism physically or chemically, increasing Mimic pollination, Ornamental plants, the mimic's Darwinian fitness. Mimicry in plants has been studied far less Butterfly, than mimicry in animals, with fewer documented cases and peer-reviewed Bird studies. It may provide protection against herbivory, or may deceptively Article Info encourage mutualists, like pollinators, to provide a service without offering Accepted: a reward in return. Pollination is a very important part of the life cycle of 20 March 2019 plants. Insects, birds, bats and the wind take pollen between flowering Available Online: plants, which means the plants can make seeds and reproduce. Its 10 April 2019 significance is to carry the pollen grains to the stigma for the process of fertilisation. Introduction Mimicry in plants pollinators, to provide a service without offering a reward in return (1,2,3). Mimicry in plants is where a plant organism evolves to resemble another organism Advantages of mimicry plants physically or chemically, increasing the mimic's Darwinian fitness. Mimicry in plants It attracts the pollinators has been studied far less than mimicry in animals, with fewer documented cases and Escape the predation from herbivores peer-reviewed studies. It may provide protection against herbivory, or may It maintains the diversity deceptively encourage mutualists, like 2969 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(4): 2969-2974 Mimic plants will maintain the descendents 2. Attracting pollinators: olfactory cues characters Butterfly, more visual in Pseudocopulation increase pollination Bird behaviour and not capacity very olfactory Bees sweet or spicy Mimic in plants is a vivid demonstration of Moth very heady sweet natural selection as a guiding force in fragrances evolutionary change (4-6). Bats Strong fruity or musky scents Uses of mimicry 3. Attracting pollinators: shape Mutualism Beetle easy, open entrance, 1. Friendly mutualism structural foods Hovering generally hang down Here help each other, both benefit and no one pollinators and have a long nectar is harmed. No free lunch, but benefits higher tube than costs. need perches or landing Non-hovering platforms as part of the 2. Antagonism insects and birds flower One benefits, another is harmed. Mimicry of Drakea spp. female 3. Commensalism Pollination syndrome One benefits, another is unaffected. Cantharophily Beetle I. atropurpurea pollination Pollination systems Myophily Fly Skunk cabbage pollination lady-slipper orchid 1. Attracting pollinators: visual cues (Cypripedium spp)Alcohol produce A “Bull’s eye” color Rudbeckia, a Phalaenophily Moth Gymnadenia pattern(background black-eyed susan pollination conopsea (Fragrant of green foliage) Orchid) Pollinated by Hummingbird A reversed bull’s day lily Hawkmoth eye Hemerocallis Psychophily Butter Gaillardia(painted Human & butterfly Gaillardia, pollination daisy) painted daisy Melittophily Bees Morning dew, Honey bee orange/white pollination Mectan sunflower flowers Obligate figs-fig wasps pollination yuccas-yucca moths (Tegeticula) 2970 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(4): 2969-2974 Herbivory 5. Batesian 6. Cryptic 1. Venus’s fly trap 1. Bakerian The two-lobbed trap: 3 trigger hairs on the inner face of each lobe, fringed with teeth-like Bakerian mimicry, named after English projections. When one trigger hair is touched naturalist Herbet Baker, is a form of twice or when two are touched in succession, automimicry or intraspecific mimicry that the trap closes. The teeth-like projections occurs within a single species. In plants, the interlock, trapping the unsuspecting victim female flowers, mimic male flowers of their inside. The struggling victim stimulates the own species, cheating pollinators out of a secretion of digestive juices. The trap reopens reward. This reproductive mimicry may not in about 10 days (7). be readily apparent as members of the same species may still exhibit some degree of 2. Sundew sexual dimorphism, i.e. the phenotypic difference between males and females of the More than 100 species of sundews (Drosera). same species. Leaves are covered with tiny (usually red) Examples hairs, which exude a clear, sticky fluid (dewdrops).The sticky droplets attract and It is common in many species of Caricaceae, a trap insects. The struggling insect stimulates family of flowering plants in the family of the hairs to bend inward towards the centre of Brassicaceae, found primarily in tropical the leaf, to wrap it in a neat, tight package. regions of Central and South America, and Africa. 3. Butterwort 2. Dodsonian Leaves with a very sticky surface. Greasy to the touch, but deadly to any small insect that Dodsonian mimicry, named after American may land on or try to cross one of the leaves. botanist, orchidologist, and taxonomist, Calaway H. Dodson, is a form of reproductive 4. Pitcher plants floral mimicry, but the model belongs to a different species than the mimic. By Leaves or leave parts modified into pitcher- providing similar sensory signals as the model like structures. Pitchers contain plant juice flower, it can lure its pollinators. Like that smells like sweet nectar and attracts Bakerian mimics, no nectar is provided. insects. Pitchers are topped with a hood or lid. When insect try to drink from the pitcher, it Examples loses its footing on the smooth interior, slides to the bottom, lands in a pool of liquid, which S.No Crop Resemble Pollinators crop digests the victim. 1. Epidendrum Lantana Humming ibaguense camara and birds and Types of mimicry in plants Asclepias Monarch curassavica butterfly 1. Bakerian 2. Cistus spp. Ophrys spp. Lamellicorn 2. Dodsonian beetle 3. Vavilovian 4. Pouyannian 2971 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(4): 2969-2974 Epidendrum ibaguense a species of epiphytic countries. It is suitable for temperate region. orchid of the genus. Epidendrum that occurs Creeping bent grass also express the same in Trinidad, French, Venezuela, Colombia, characters of Annual blue grass which is and Northern Brazil, resembles flowers of normally used as gulf course in now-a-days. Lantana camera and Asclepias curassavica (commonly called Mexican butterfly weed, 4. Pouyannian blood-flower, scarlet milkweed, or tropical milkweed), both are species of flowering Many plants have evolved to appear like other plant with the first in the Verbena family, organisms, most commonly insects. This can while the latter belongs to the milkweed have wide-ranging benefits including family, and both are native to the American increasing pollination. The flowers mimic a tropics. Epidendrum ibaguense is pollinated potential female mate visually, but the key by Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) and stimuli are often chemical and tactile. perhaps humming birds. Similar cases are seen in some other species of the same family. Examples The mimetic species may still have The hammer orchid (Drakaea spp.) an pollinators of its own though, for example a endangered genus of orchid that is native to Lamellicorn beetle, which usually pollinates Australia is one of the most notable examples. correspondingly coloured Cistus spp. flowers, The orchid has both visual and olfactory is also known to aid in pollination of Ophrys mimics of a female wasp to lure males to both spp. that are normally pollinated by bees (8). deposit and pick up pollen. 3. Vavilovian The orchid Epipactis helleborine is physiologically and morphologically adapted Vavilovian mimicry named after Russian to attract social wasps as their primary plant geneticist who identified the centres of pollinators. Social wasps feed their larvae on origin of cultivated plants, Nikolai Vavilov is insects like caterpillars. To locate that prey, a form of mimicry in plants where a weed they use a combination of visual and olfactory comes to share one or more characteristics cues. The flowers of E.helleborine and E. with a domesticated through generations of purpurata emit green-leaf volatiles (GLVs), artificial selection. It is also known as crop which are attractive to foragers of the social mimicry or weed mimicry. Selection against wasps Vespula germanica and V.vulgaris. the weed may occur by killing a young or Several E. helleborine GLVs that induced a adult weed, separating its seeds from those of response in the antennae of wasps were also the crop (winnowing), or both. This has been emitted by cabbage leaves infested with done manually since Neolithic times, and in caterpillars (Pieris brassicae), which are more recent years by agricultural machinery. common prey items for wasps. Despite a large nectar reward, the species is almost entirely Examples overlooked by other pollinators. Erigeron Canadensis (weed species) have Carrion flowers mimic the scent and same similar character inflorence a cultivated appearance of rotting flesh to attract species of Amaranthus palmeri necrophagous (carrion-feeding) insects like flesh flies (Sarcophagidae), blowflies Annual bluegrass is mowing tolerance (Calliphoridae), house flies (Muscidae) and capacity and used as Gulf course in foreign some beetles (e.g., Dermestidae and 2972 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(4): 2969-2974 Silphidae) which search for dead animals to that deter herbivory due to predatory habit or use as brood sites. The decaying smell of the toxicity. This may be a case of visual mimicry flower comes from oligosulfides, decayed or perceptual exploitation. Case examples proteins that contain amino acids methionine include the new buds of Onopordum spp. and cysteine. While carrion flowers do from Israel, Carthamus sp.
Recommended publications
  • Egg-Mimics of Streptanthus (Cruciferae) Deter Oviposition by Pieris Sisymbrii (Lepidoptera: Pieridae)
    Oecologia (Berl) (1981) 48:142-143 Oecologia Springer-Verlag 198l Short Communication Egg-Mimics of Streptanthus (Cruciferae) Deter Oviposition by Pieris sisymbrii (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) Arthur M. Shapiro Department of Zoology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA Summary. Streptanthus breweri, a serpentine-soil annual mus- appear to decrease the attractiveness of mature S. glandulosus tard, produces pigmented callosities on its upper leaves which to ovipositing females (Shapiro, in press). are thought to mimic the eggs of the Pierid butterfly Pieris The efficacy of the suspected egg-mimics of S. breweri was sisymbrii. P. sisymbrii is one of several inflorescence - infructes- tested afield at Turtle Rock, Napa County, California (North cence-feeding Pierids which assess egg load visually on individual Coast Ranges). The site is an almost unvegetated, steep serpen- host plants prior to ovipositing. Removal of the "egg-mimics" tine talus slope with a S to SW exposure. S. breweri is the domi- from S. breweri plants in situ significantly increases the probabili- nant Crucifer (S. glandulosus also occurs) and P. sisymbrii the ty of an oviposition relative to similar, intact plants. dominant Pierid (Anthocharis sara Lucas and Euchloe hyantis Edw., both Euchloines, are present). On 10 April 1980 I prepared two lists of 50 numbers from a random numbers table. On 11 April, 100 plants of S. breweri "Egg-load assessment" occurs when a female insect's choice in the appropriate phenophase (elongating/budding, bearing egg- to oviposit or not on a given substrate is influenced by whether mimics) were numbered and tagged. Each was measured, its or not eggs (con or heterospecific) are present.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinator Diversity and Reproductive Success of [I]Epipactis Helleborine[I]
    Manuscript to be reviewed Pollinator diversity and reproductive success of Epipactis helleborine (L.) Crantz (Orchidaceae) in anthropogenic and natural habitats Agnieszka Rewicz Corresp., 1 , Radomir Jaskuła 2 , Tomasz Rewicz 3 , Grzegorz Tończyk 2 1 Department of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland 2 Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland 3 Laboratory of Microscopic Imaging and Specialized Biological Techniques, University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland Corresponding Author: Agnieszka Rewicz Email address: [email protected] Background. Epipactis helleborine is an Eurasian orchid species which prefers woodland environments but it may also spontaneously and successfully colonise human-made artificial and disturbed habitats such as roadsides, town parks and gardens. It is suggested that orchids colonising anthropogenic habitats are characterised by a specific set of features (e.g.: large plant size, fast flower production). However, as it is not well known how pollinator diversity and reproductive success of E. helleborine differs in populations in anthropogenic habitats compared to populations from natural habitats, we wanted to compare pollinator diversity and reproductive success of this orchid species between natural and anthropogenic habitat types. Methods. Pollination biology, reproductive success and autogamy in populations of E. helleborine from anthropogenic (roadside) and natural (forest) habitats were compared. Eight populations (four natural and four human-disturbed ones) in two seasons were studied according to height of plants, length of inflorescences, as well as numbers of juvenile shoots, flowering shoots, flowers, and fruits. The number and diversity of insect pollinators were studied in one natural and two human-disturbed populations. Results.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Vasconcellea Wild Species in the Papaya Breeding (Carica Papaya L.- Caricaceae): a Cytological Evaluation
    The use of Vasconcellea wild species in the papaya breeding (Carica papaya L.- Caricaceae): a cytological evaluation Telma N. S. Pereira, Monique F. Neto, Lyzia L. Freitas, Messias G. Pereira Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro - Campos dos Goytacazes - RJ -Brazil Introduction Papaya is a fruit species grown in tropical and subtropical regions. The cultivars of this species are all susceptible to ring spot mosaic virus; however, there is in the Caricaceae family wild species that exhibit resistance genes to the virus as Vasconcellea cauliflora, V. cundinamarcensis, V. quercifolia, and V. stipulata. But, interspecific/intergeneric hybrids are not obtained between the wild species and the cultivated one, thus preventing the introgression of important genes in the cultivated form. The objectives of this study were to generate cytogenetic knowledge by karyotype determination and species meiotic behavior.The study was conducted on C.papaya, V.quercifolia,V.cundinamarcensis, V.cauliflora,V.goudotiana, and V.monoica by routine laboratory methodology. Methodology Seeds Germination Pdb=8h Fixation Observation Coloration Enzimatic Figure 1- Caricaceae species. A) Carica papaya; B)Vasconcellea monoica; Figure 2- Papaya products. Figure 3- Mitotic protocol. Figure 4- Meiosis protocol. C)Vasconcellea quercifolia;D)Vasconcellea cundinamarcensis; E) Vasconcellea goudotiana; F)Vasconcellea cauliflora. Results Table 1 - Karyotype formulas, mean sets lenghts and similarities indices of Caricaceae species. Table 2 - Characteristics evaluated during meiosis and post-meiosis in C. papaya, V. Goutodiana,V. monoica and V. Quercifolia. Karyotype Rec Syi Species Meiosis Recombination Meiotic Pollen Species formula THC TF (%) index index abnormalites index index viability C. papaya 9M 17.18 45.51 82.66 82.69 C.papay a 4.76% 26.0% 94.8% 96.0% V.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • Rearing Pieris Brassicae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) on Artificial
    R:H.BJAA.PA.PGDI.J6E6C No. 40: 95ῌ98 (2004) Short Communication Rearing Pieris brassicae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) on Artificial Diets Hiromitsu N6>ID and Noboru O<6L6 Research Division, Yokohama Plant Protection Station 1ῌ16ῌ10, Shinyamashita, Naka-ku, Yokohama 231ῌ0801, Japan. Abstract: Larvae of the large white butterfly Pieris brassicae (L.) were reared on four kinds of artificial diets, consisting of a multipurpose basic insect feed, plus either green juice powder or dried Japanese radish leaf powder as a preference material, in the laboratory. Each preference material was given at contents of 10 and 20῎,bydry weight. No larvae died during the larval stage in all plots. However, the duration of larval development on the diet containing 10῎ green juice powder was 2 days longer than that of the control, reared on fresh kale leaves. The average of pupal weights reared on each diet was about 360ῌ460 mg, and the percentage of adult emergence was 93.3ῌ100῎.The results made it clear that artificial diets consisting of a multipurpose basic insect feed, plus Brassica leaf powder as a preference material, were useful to rear the larval stage of the large white butterfly in the laboratory. Key words: Pieris brassicae,rearing, artificial diet, green juice, Japanese radish Introduction Occurrence of the large white butterfly Pieris brassicae (L.) was detected in Hokkaido prefecture in 1996, and subsequent field surveys showed the butterfly to be distributed not only in Hokkaido but also in Aomori prefecture (Yokohama Plant Protection Station, 1997). Therefore, studies on susceptibility to some insecticides are conducted, to control the butterfly.
    [Show full text]
  • Thistles of Colorado
    Thistles of Colorado About This Guide Identification and Management Guide Many individuals, organizations and agencies from throughout the state (acknowledgements on inside back cover) contributed ideas, content, photos, plant descriptions, management information and printing support toward the completion of this guide. Mountain thistle (Cirsium scopulorum) growing above timberline Casey Cisneros, Tim D’Amato and the Larimer County Department of Natural Resources Weed District collected, compiled and edited information, content and photos for this guide. Produced by the We welcome your comments, corrections, suggestions, and high Larimer County quality photos. If you would like to contribute to future editions, please contact the Larimer County Weed District at 970-498- Weed District 5769 or email [email protected] or [email protected]. Front cover photo of Cirsium eatonii var. hesperium by Janis Huggins Partners in Land Stewardship 2nd Edition 1 2 Table of Contents Introduction 4 Introduction Native Thistles (Pages 6-20) Barneyby’s Thistle (Cirsium barnebyi) 6 Cainville Thistle (Cirsium clacareum) 6 Native thistles are dispersed broadly Eaton’s Thistle (Cirsium eatonii) 8 across many Colorado ecosystems. Individual species occupy niches from Elk or Meadow Thistle (Cirsium scariosum) 8 3,500 feet to above timberline. These Flodman’s Thistle (Cirsium flodmanii) 10 plants are valuable to pollinators, seed Fringed or Fish Lake Thistle (Cirsium 10 feeders, browsing wildlife and to the centaureae or C. clavatum var. beauty and diversity of our native plant americanum) communities. Some non-native species Mountain Thistle (Cirsium scopulorum) 12 have become an invasive threat to New Mexico Thistle (Cirsium 12 agriculture and natural areas. For this reason, native and non-native thistles neomexicanum) alike are often pulled, mowed, clipped or Ousterhout’s or Aspen Thistle (Cirsium 14 sprayed indiscriminately.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Evolution: Major Ecological Adaptations and Evolutionary Transitions
    Biol. Rev. (2019), pp. 000–000. 1 doi: 10.1111/brv.12510 Fungal evolution: major ecological adaptations and evolutionary transitions Miguel A. Naranjo-Ortiz1 and Toni Gabaldon´ 1,2,3∗ 1Department of Genomics and Bioinformatics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain 2 Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08003 Barcelona, Spain 3ICREA, Pg. Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain ABSTRACT Fungi are a highly diverse group of heterotrophic eukaryotes characterized by the absence of phagotrophy and the presence of a chitinous cell wall. While unicellular fungi are far from rare, part of the evolutionary success of the group resides in their ability to grow indefinitely as a cylindrical multinucleated cell (hypha). Armed with these morphological traits and with an extremely high metabolical diversity, fungi have conquered numerous ecological niches and have shaped a whole world of interactions with other living organisms. Herein we survey the main evolutionary and ecological processes that have guided fungal diversity. We will first review the ecology and evolution of the zoosporic lineages and the process of terrestrialization, as one of the major evolutionary transitions in this kingdom. Several plausible scenarios have been proposed for fungal terrestralization and we here propose a new scenario, which considers icy environments as a transitory niche between water and emerged land. We then focus on exploring the main ecological relationships of Fungi with other organisms (other fungi, protozoans, animals and plants), as well as the origin of adaptations to certain specialized ecological niches within the group (lichens, black fungi and yeasts).
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Milkweeds (Asclepias, Family Apocynaceae) in Texas
    Identification of Milkweeds (Asclepias, Family Apocynaceae) in Texas Texas milkweed (Asclepias texana), courtesy Bill Carr Compiled by Jason Singhurst and Ben Hutchins [email protected] [email protected] Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas and Walter C. Holmes [email protected] Department of Biology Baylor University Waco, Texas Identification of Milkweeds (Asclepias, Family Apocynaceae) in Texas Created in partnership with the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center Design and layout by Elishea Smith Compiled by Jason Singhurst and Ben Hutchins [email protected] [email protected] Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas and Walter C. Holmes [email protected] Department of Biology Baylor University Waco, Texas Introduction This document has been produced to serve as a quick guide to the identification of milkweeds (Asclepias spp.) in Texas. For the species listed in Table 1 below, basic information such as range (in this case county distribution), habitat, and key identification characteristics accompany a photograph of each species. This information comes from a variety of sources that includes the Manual of the Vascular Flora of Texas, Biota of North America Project, knowledge of the authors, and various other publications (cited in the text). All photographs are used with permission and are fully credited to the copyright holder and/or originator. Other items, but in particular scientific publications, traditionally do not require permissions, but only citations to the author(s) if used for scientific and/or nonprofit purposes. Names, both common and scientific, follow those in USDA NRCS (2015). When identifying milkweeds in the field, attention should be focused on the distinguishing characteristics listed for each species.
    [Show full text]
  • Mimicry and Defense
    3/24/2015 Professor Donald McFarlane Mimicry and Defense Protective Strategies Camouflage (“Cryptic coloration”) Diverse Coloration Diversion Structures Startle Structures 2 1 3/24/2015 Camouflage (“Cryptic coloration”) Minimize 3d shape, e.g. flatfish Halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) 3 4 2 3/24/2015 Counter‐Shading 5 Disruptive Coloration 6 3 3/24/2015 Polymorphism – Cepeae snails 7 Polymorphism – Oophaga granuliferus 8 4 3/24/2015 Polymorphism – 9 Polymorphism – Oophaga Geographic locations of study populations and their color patterns. (A) Map of the pacific coast of Colombia showing the three study localities: in blue Oophaga histrionica, in orange O. lehmanni, and in green the pHYB population. (B) Examples of color patterns of individuals from the pHYB population (1–4) and the pattern from a hybrid between Oophaga histrionica and O. lehmanni bred in the laboratory (H) 10 5 3/24/2015 Diversion Structures 11 Startle Structures 12 6 3/24/2015 Warning Coloration (Aposematic coloration) Advertise organism as distasteful, toxic or venomous Problem: Predators must learn by attacking prey; predator learning is costly to prey. Therefore strong selective pressure to STANDARDIZE on a few colors/patterns. This is MULLERIAN MIMICRY. Most common is yellow/black, or red/yellow/black 13 Warning Coloration (Aposematic coloration) Bumblebee (Bombus Black and yellow mangrove snake (Boiga sp.) Sand Wasp (bembix oculata) dendrophila) Yellow‐banded poison dart frog (Dendrobates leucomelas Fire salamander ( Salamandra salamandra) 14 7 3/24/2015 Warning Coloration (Aposematic coloration) coral snakes (Micrurus sp.) ~ 50 species in two families, all venomous 15 Batesian Mimicry 1862 –Henry Walter Bates; “A Naturalist on the River Amazons” 16 8 3/24/2015 Batesian Mimicry Batesian mimics “cheat” –they lack toxins, venom, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Lists of the Vascular Plant Families with Their Phylogenetic
    Colligo 2 (1) : 3-10 BOTANIQUE Alphabetical lists of the vascular plant families with their phylogenetic classification numbers Listes alphabétiques des familles de plantes vasculaires avec leurs numéros de classement phylogénétique FRÉDÉRIC DANET* *Mairie de Lyon, Espaces verts, Jardin botanique, Herbier, 69205 Lyon cedex 01, France - [email protected] Citation : Danet F., 2019. Alphabetical lists of the vascular plant families with their phylogenetic classification numbers. Colligo, 2(1) : 3- 10. https://perma.cc/2WFD-A2A7 KEY-WORDS Angiosperms family arrangement Summary: This paper provides, for herbarium cura- Gymnosperms Classification tors, the alphabetical lists of the recognized families Pteridophytes APG system in pteridophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms Ferns PPG system with their phylogenetic classification numbers. Lycophytes phylogeny Herbarium MOTS-CLÉS Angiospermes rangement des familles Résumé : Cet article produit, pour les conservateurs Gymnospermes Classification d’herbier, les listes alphabétiques des familles recon- Ptéridophytes système APG nues pour les ptéridophytes, les gymnospermes et Fougères système PPG les angiospermes avec leurs numéros de classement Lycophytes phylogénie phylogénétique. Herbier Introduction These alphabetical lists have been established for the systems of A.-L de Jussieu, A.-P. de Can- The organization of herbarium collections con- dolle, Bentham & Hooker, etc. that are still used sists in arranging the specimens logically to in the management of historical herbaria find and reclassify them easily in the appro- whose original classification is voluntarily pre- priate storage units. In the vascular plant col- served. lections, commonly used methods are systema- Recent classification systems based on molecu- tic classification, alphabetical classification, or lar phylogenies have developed, and herbaria combinations of both.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire and Nonnative Invasive Plants September 2008 Zouhar, Kristin; Smith, Jane Kapler; Sutherland, Steve; Brooks, Matthew L
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Ecosystems General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 6 Fire and Nonnative Invasive Plants September 2008 Zouhar, Kristin; Smith, Jane Kapler; Sutherland, Steve; Brooks, Matthew L. 2008. Wildland fire in ecosystems: fire and nonnative invasive plants. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 6. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 355 p. Abstract—This state-of-knowledge review of information on relationships between wildland fire and nonnative invasive plants can assist fire managers and other land managers concerned with prevention, detection, and eradi- cation or control of nonnative invasive plants. The 16 chapters in this volume synthesize ecological and botanical principles regarding relationships between wildland fire and nonnative invasive plants, identify the nonnative invasive species currently of greatest concern in major bioregions of the United States, and describe emerging fire-invasive issues in each bioregion and throughout the nation. This volume can help increase understanding of plant invasions and fire and can be used in fire management and ecosystem-based management planning. The volume’s first part summarizes fundamental concepts regarding fire effects on invasions by nonnative plants, effects of plant invasions on fuels and fire regimes, and use of fire to control plant invasions. The second part identifies the nonnative invasive species of greatest concern and synthesizes information on the three topics covered in part one for nonnative inva- sives in seven major bioregions of the United States: Northeast, Southeast, Central, Interior West, Southwest Coastal, Northwest Coastal (including Alaska), and Hawaiian Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Developmental and Genetic Bases of Apetaly in Bocconia Frutescens
    Arango‑Ocampo et al. EvoDevo (2016) 7:16 DOI 10.1186/s13227-016-0054-6 EvoDevo RESEARCH Open Access The developmental and genetic bases of apetaly in Bocconia frutescens (Chelidonieae: Papaveraceae) Cristina Arango‑Ocampo1, Favio González2, Juan Fernando Alzate3 and Natalia Pabón‑Mora1* Abstract Background: Bocconia and Macleaya are the only genera of the poppy family (Papaveraceae) lacking petals; how‑ ever, the developmental and genetic processes underlying such evolutionary shift have not yet been studied. Results: We studied floral development in two species of petal-less poppies Bocconia frutescens and Macleaya cordata as well as in the closely related petal-bearing Stylophorum diphyllum. We generated a floral transcriptome of B. frutescens to identify MADS-box ABCE floral organ identity genes expressed during early floral development. We performed phylogenetic analyses of these genes across Ranunculales as well as RT-PCR and qRT-PCR to assess loci- specific expression patterns. We found that petal-to-stamen homeosis in petal-less poppies occurs through distinct developmental pathways. Transcriptomic analyses of B. frutescens floral buds showed that homologs of all MADS-box genes are expressed except for the APETALA3-3 ortholog. Species-specific duplications of other ABCE genes inB. frute- scens have resulted in functional copies with expanded expression patterns than those predicted by the model. Conclusions: Petal loss in B. frutescens is likely associated with the lack of expression of AP3-3 and an expanded expression of AGAMOUS. The genetic basis of petal identity is conserved in Ranunculaceae and Papaveraceae although they have different number of AP3 paralogs and exhibit dissimilar floral groundplans.
    [Show full text]