Modeling the Europa Plasma Torus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 98, NO. A12, PAGES 21,231-21,243, DECEMBER 1, 1993 Modeling the Europa Plasma Torus RON SCHREIER AND AHARON EVIATAR 1 Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, The Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel VYTENIS M. VASYLIONAS Max-Planck-Institut fgr Aeronomie, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany JOHN D. RICHARDSON Center for Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge The existenceof a torus of plasma generated by sputtering from Jupiter's satellite Europa has long been suspectedbut never yet convincingly demonstrated. Temperature profiles from Voyager plasma observations indicate the presence of hot, possibly freshly picked-up ions in the general vicinity of the orbit of Europa, which may be interpreted as evidence for a local plasma torus. Studies of ion partitioning in the outer regions of the Io torus reveal that the oxygen to sulfur mixing ratio varies with radial distance; this may indicate that oxygen-rich matter is injected from a non-Io source, most probably Europa. We have constructed a quantitative model of a plasma torus near the orbit of Europa which takes into account plasma input from the Io torus, sputtering from the surfaceof Europa, a great number of ionization and charge exchangeprocesses, and plasma loss by diffusive transport. When the transport time is chosen so that the model's total number density in consistent with the observed total plasma density, the contribution from Europa is found to be significant although not dominant. The model predicts in detail the ion composition,charge states, and the relative fractionsof hot Europa-generatedand (presumed) cold Io-generated ions. The results are generally consistentwith observationsfrom Voyager and can in principle (subjectto [imitationsof data coverage)be confirmedin more detail by Ulysses. INTRODUCTION incorporated.Bagenal et. al. [1992],in an investigationof It has long been accepted that Io is the dominant source the paucityof O++ in the Io torusreported by Brownet al. of plasma in the magnetosphereof Jupiter and that con- [1983],found that O++ pervadesthe entiremagnetosphere tributions from the icy satellites are insignificant. A re- and that while the sulfur density drops off with increas- ported detection of Europa-associated plasma in the Pio- ing radial distance, as expected, the oxygen does not. This neer 10 data set [Intriligator and Miller, 1982]did not win again led to the suggestionthat Europa may be playing a broad acceptance. Early evaluationsof the sourcestrength role as a magnetosphericplasma source. Renewed interest of Europaranged from 8 x 1026s -• fromsputtering by ra- in the possibility of a Europa torus was stimulated by the diation belt particles[Johnson et al., 1981]down to as low Ulyssesencounter with Jupiter. Observationsmade during as 3 x 1024s -• from sputteringby corotatingiogenic ions the Ulyssesflyby of Jupiter confirmedthe existenceof signif- [Eviatar et al., 1981]. The latter estimatewas made be- icantamounts of O++ in regionsof the magnetospherewell fore the results of the low-energysputtering experimentsof off the zenomagneticequatorial plane [Geisset al., 1992]. Bar-Nun et al. [1985] becameavailable and significantly The Ulyssesinstruments were turned off, however, during undervaluesthe source rate. Later analysesby Sieveka and the close approach of the spacecraft to the planet, and no Johnson[1982] and Squyreset al. [1983]led to a deeperun- data were acquired in the equatorial plane. Our results com- derstandingof the interaction of the surfaceof Europa with plement the Ulysses ion mass spectrometer results as we the magnetosphereplasma [Eviatar et al., 1985]. strive to create a continuous latitudinal profile of plasma Baganal[1989] reported a significantenhancement of a density and composition. This, of course, implies basic time hot heavy-ion component outside the hot torus, as shown independence, which is indeed a limitation of the vMidity in Figure l a, and suggestedthat this oxygen component of the conclusions. Confirmation of the Europa source hy- might be associatedwith Europa. pothesisawaits more detailed analysisof the Ulyssesplasma These are preliminary results as the correctionsfor elec- data set. tron and ion feedthrough to the measured currents in the We present the results from a numerical model of the Eu- PlasmaScience (PLS) instrumenthave not yet been fully ropa torus. Sputtering from Europa's icy surface by mag- netospheric particles is a source of molecular and atomic water fragments, and ionization and other atomic processes • Also at Department of AtmosphericSciences, University of California, Los Angeles. produce plasma in the vicinity of the satellite's orbit. We first summarize what is known today about the plas- Copyright 1993 by the American Geophysical Union ma conditionsnear Europa. We then present the model and Paper number 93JA02585. examine the effect of various parameters on the results, and 0148-0227/93/93JA-02585505.00 compare the calculated density and composition with the 21,231 21,232 SCHREIERET AL.: MODELING THE EUROPAPLASMA TORUS I0000 _ _ _ _ 1000=-_ • •/•• -= ioo_-- • •. -- • _ _ I0 - ,, -: ß T•(average) : _ _ I --- / • T•(cold) _ • T•(hot) 0,1 ,,,,I,,,,1•,1,,,,I,•1,,,,I,,,,I,,,,I .... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 4 L-shell (offset) Fig, ! a, Flacl.ia].profiles of the temperatures of various components of the ion p]a.smaa.s observed by the P I.,S instrumenton Voyager.1, The plot is taken from Bage•l ['1989], O.SO The main cluster consistsof the A, B, and C cups, which are mounted about a cone whosecentral axis points toward Earth. The D cup points perpendicularto the spacecraft- Sun direction. When the spacecraft was inbound toward Jupiter, the D cup pointed approximatelyinto the corota- tion direction during both the Voyager 1 and Voyager2 en- counters. A detailed description of the instrument and its modesof operationis givenby Bridg• •t al. [1977].This is an electrostaticinstrument which has the capability to pro- 0.01 .... ' .... ' .... ' .... ' .... ,, ,A,, vide well-resolvedparticle spectra wheneverthe flow is cold 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 and directed into the detectors. Such conditions held in the ;j mid-magnetosphereplasma sheet [McArutt •t aL, 1981]. Fig. 1b. Ion partitioningfrom fits to UVS spectra(except O ++ opencircles which are frommodel calculations), taken from Figure 2 showsspectra from the Voyager2 P LS instru- •l et •l. [1992]. ment obtainednear closest approach; the correspondingbest fits (giventhe input assumptions)to thesespectra are shown observations.We alsoinvestigate the relative importanceof in the panelsof Figure 3. The spectrumin Figure 2a is ob- iogenicand eurogenicsources in order to determinewhether tained 1.5 Rj south of the magnetic equator at a radial Europa providesa significantcontribution to its plasma en- distance of 10.16 /{j. Well-defined peaks appear in the A, vironment, that is, whether it is meaningful to discussa B, and C cups. Figure 3a showsa fit to this spectrumusing Europa plasma torus. a MaxwellJanplasma comprised of O+,S+, O++,SS+,Na +, andK ++ [McArutt,this issue]. Another example of a spec- EUROPA'S PLASMA ENVIRONMENT trum in which well-definedpeaks appear is shownin Figure The plasma conditionsin the vicinity of Europa can be 25 and its associatedfit is shown by Figure 3b. Figure 2c summarized as follows: The ion number density lies in the presentsa spectrum obtained at closestapproach, outside range30 to 50 cm-s [Belcher,1983]. The temperatureof the orbit of Europa at a similar distance(1.5 Rj) off the the thermal or cold component rises from 50-60 eV at L magnetic equator. Since the plasma is warm, the currents ~ 6 to 200-400 eV atL ~ 9-11, and there is an additional from individual speciesoverlap. Nevertheless,this spectrum (30%) hot componentat ~ 2 keV [Bagenal,1989]. The hot showsthe presenceof a hot locally picked-up background componentcan be attributed to pickup ions created outside plasmaas found by Bagenal[1989]. The crowdingof six of Europa's orbit and heated adiabatically. The electron ion componentsinto 50 energychannels (Figures 3a and distribution function is also describedby two components: prevents a unique determination of plasma parameters. a coldcomponent (26 eV) witha numberdensity of 36 cm -3 An agreementbetween a numerical model and the results anda hot (1.2 keV) andtenuous component (3.1 cm-3) of obtained from the analysis of the PLS spectra is an im- suprathermal electrons. Any successfulmodel of a steady portant test for the model. Though the processof fitting state torus must reproduce these observationsof Europa's ion distribution functions to the PLS spectra is not unique environment. (i.e., the A/Z-•16 componentmight be attributedeither to O+ andS++.), general characteristics of the model param- PLS OBSERVATIONS eters (e.g., the total numberdensity and the partitioning The Voyager PLS instrument consistsof four modulated- between(cold)iogenic and (hot) eurogenicplasma) should grid Faradaycups (A, B, C andD) whichmeasure ions and match those of the fits. The poor quality of the fits to the D electronsin the energy-per-chargerange 10 to 5950 eV/q. cup currentsmay imply that significantelectron feedthrough SCHRI•II•RI•T AL.: MODI•LINGTHI• EUROPAPLASMA TORUS 21,233 VOYRGER SPECTRRL DRTR 10• R CUP 106 B CUP Illl II III III III! . •0 5 _ •o s z • - • . •o • - - 103 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lO3 0 •2 6q 96 128 0 32 6q 96 128 CHRNNELc•NBER 106 lO6 I""'"'""'"l •o 5 ,JOS z z w 8o • •o • lOs 0 32 6q 96 128 o 32 60, 96 128 CHANNEL NUMBER CHANNEL NUMBER JUPITER MRCNETOSPNERE B - (-36.388 , qq.816 , -71.952 ) CANNA VOYAGER 2 CHARGE DENSITY ESTIMFITE = (11.9367 ) 1979 190 2000:10.0q5 VCUP - (96.509 , 102.57q , 103.225 , 16.127 ) KM/S R = 10.290 RHO(HAG) = 10.180 Z(MRG) = -1.506 RIGID COROTATION SPEED = 127.763 VOYAGER SPECTRAL DRTR R CUP 108 lO6 B cup .
Recommended publications
  • Ejecta Event Associated with a Two&Hyphen;Step Geomagnetic Storm

    Ejecta Event Associated with a Two&Hyphen;Step Geomagnetic Storm

    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 111, A11104, doi:10.1029/2006JA011893, 2006 A two-ejecta event associated with a two-step geomagnetic storm C. J. Farrugia,1 V. K. Jordanova,1,2 M. F. Thomsen,2 G. Lu,3 S. W. H. Cowley,4 and K. W. Ogilvie5 Received 2 June 2006; revised 1 September 2006; accepted 12 September 2006; published 16 November 2006. [1] A new view on how large disturbances in the magnetosphere may be prolonged and intensified further emerges from a recently discovered interplanetary process: the collision/merger of interplanetary (IP) coronal mass ejections (ICMEs; ejecta) within 1 AU. As shown in a recent pilot study, the merging process changes IP parameters dramatically with respect to values in isolated ejecta. The resulting geoeffects of the coalesced (‘‘complex’’) ejecta reflect a superposition of IP triggers which may result in, for example, two-step, major geomagnetic storms. In a case study, we isolate the effects on ring current enhancement when two coalescing ejecta reached Earth on 31 March 2001. The magnetosphere ‘‘senses’’ the presence of the two ejecta and responds with a reactivation of the ring current soon after it started to recover from the passage of the first ejection, giving rise to a double-dip (DD) great storm (each min Dst < À250 nT). A drift-loss global kinetic model of ring current buildup shows that in this case the major factor determining the intensity of the storm activity is the very high (up to 10 cmÀ3) plasma sheet density. The plasma sheet density, in turn, is found to correlate well with the very high solar wind density, suggesting the compression of the leading ejecta as the source of the hot, superdense plasma sheet in this case.
  • Mechanisms of Formation of Multiple Current Sheets in the Heliospheric Plasma Sheet

    Mechanisms of Formation of Multiple Current Sheets in the Heliospheric Plasma Sheet

    EGU2020-3945 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-3945 EGU General Assembly 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Mechanisms of formation of multiple current sheets in the heliospheric plasma sheet Evgeniy Maiewski1, Helmi Malova2,3, Roman Kislov3,4, Victor Popov5, Anatoly Petrukovich3, and Lev Zelenyi3 1National Research University”Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russian Federation ([email protected]) 2Scobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia ([email protected]) 3Space Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia 4Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IZMIRAN), Moscow, Russia 5Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia When spacecraft cross the heliospheric plasma sheet (HPS) that separates large-scale magnetic sectors of the opposite direction in the solar wind, multiple rapid fluctuations of a sign of the radial magnetic field component are observed very often, indicating the presence of multiple current sheets occurring within the HPS. Possible mechanisms of formation of these structures in the solar wind are proposed. Taking into accout that the streamer belt in the solar corona is believed to be the main source of the slow solar wind in the heliosphere, we suggest that the effect of the multi-layered HPS is determined by the extension of many streamer-belt-borne thin current sheets oriented along the neutral line of the interplanetary magnetic field. Within the framework of a proposed MHD model, self-consistent distributions of the key solar wind characteristics which depend on streamer propreties are investigated.
  • Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Driver Dependence E

    Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Driver Dependence E

    Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Driver Dependence E. K. J. Kilpua, D. Fontaine, C. Moissard, M. Ala-lahti, E. Palmerio, E. Yordanova, S. Good, M. M. H. Kalliokoski, E. Lumme, A. Osmane, et al. To cite this version: E. K. J. Kilpua, D. Fontaine, C. Moissard, M. Ala-lahti, E. Palmerio, et al.. Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Driver Dependence. Space Weather: The International Journal of Research and Applications, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2019, 17 (8), pp.1257-1280. 10.1029/2019SW002217. hal-03087107 HAL Id: hal-03087107 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03087107 Submitted on 23 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. RESEARCH ARTICLE Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal 10.1029/2019SW002217 Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Key Points: Driver Dependence • Variation of interplanetary properties and geoeffectiveness of CME-driven sheaths and their dependence on the E. K. J. Kilpua1 , D. Fontaine2 , C. Moissard2 , M. Ala-Lahti1 , E. Palmerio1 , ejecta properties are determined E.
  • The Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Observatory (MIO)

    The Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Observatory (MIO)

    1 The Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Observatory (MIO) …a mission concept to answer the question “What Drives Auroral Arcs” ♥ Get inside the aurora in the magnetosphere ♥ Know you’re inside the aurora ♥ Measure critical gradients writeup by: Joe Borovsky Los Alamos National Laboratory [email protected] (505)667-8368 updated April 4, 2002 Abstract: The MIO mission concept involves a tight swarm of satellites in geosynchronous orbit that are magnetically connected to a ground-based observatory, with a satellite-based electron beam establishing the precise connection to the ionosphere. The aspect of this mission that enables it to solve the outstanding auroral problem is “being in the right place at the right time – and knowing it”. Each of the many auroral-arc-generator mechanisms that have been hypothesized has a characteristic gradient in the magnetosphere as its fingerprint. The MIO mission is focused on (1) getting inside the auroral generator in the magnetosphere, (2) knowing you are inside, and (3) measuring critical gradients inside the generator. The decisive gradient measurements are performed in the magnetosphere with satellite separations of 100’s of km. The magnetic footpoint of the swarm is marked in the ionosphere with an electron gun firing into the loss cone from one satellite. The beamspot is detected from the ground optically and/or by HF radar, and ground-based auroral imagers and radar provide the auroral context of the satellite swarm. With the satellites in geosynchronous orbit, a single ground observatory can spot the beam image and monitor the aurora, with full-time conjunctions between the satellites and the aurora.
  • Dust Clouds and Plasmoids in Saturn's Magnetosphere

    Dust Clouds and Plasmoids in Saturn's Magnetosphere

    Dust clouds and plasmoids in Saturn’s Magnetosphere as seen with four Cassini instruments Emil Khalisi1 Max-Planck-Institute for Nuclear Physics, Saupfercheckweg 1, D–69117 Heidelberg, Germany Abstract We revisit the evidence for a ”dust cloud” observed by the Cassini space- craft at Saturn in 2006. The data of four instruments are simultaneously compared to interpret the signatures of a coherent swarm of dust that would have remained near the equatorial plane for as long as six weeks. The con- spicuous pattern, as seen in the dust counters of the Cosmic Dust Analyser (CDA), clearly repeats on three consecutive revolutions of the spacecraft. That particular cloud is estimated to about 1.36 Saturnian radii in size, and probably broadening. We also present a reconnection event from the magnetic field data (MAG) that leave behind several plasmoids like those reported from the Voyager flybys in the early 1980s. That magnetic bubbles happened at the dawn side of Saturn’s magnetosphere. At their nascency, the magnetic field showed a switchover of its alignment, disruption of flux tubes and a recovery on a time scale of about 30 days. However, we cannot rule out that different events might have taken place. Empirical evidence is shown at another occasion when a plasmoid was carrying a cloud of tiny dust particles such that a connection between plasmoids and coherent dust clouds is probable. Keywords: Dust clouds, Saturn, Cassini mission, Cosmic Dust Analyser, arXiv:1702.01579v1 [astro-ph.EP] 6 Feb 2017 Magnetosphere URL: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.12.030 (Emil Khalisi) 1Corresponding author: [email protected] Preprint accepted by Advances in Space Research [JASR13029] 7th February 2017 1.
  • Cold and Dense Plasma Sheet Caused by Solar Wind Entry: Direct Evidence

    Cold and Dense Plasma Sheet Caused by Solar Wind Entry: Direct Evidence

    atmosphere Case Report Cold and Dense Plasma Sheet Caused by Solar Wind Entry: Direct Evidence Yue Yu 1,2, Zuzheng Chen 1,2,* and Fang Chen 1,2 1 School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100089, China; [email protected] (Y.Y.); [email protected] (F.C.) 2 Key Laboratory of Space Environment Monitoring and Information Processing, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing 100089, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 June 2020; Accepted: 2 August 2020; Published: 7 August 2020 Abstract: We present a coordinated observation with the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission, located in the Earth’s magnetotail plasma sheet, and the Acceleration, Reconnection, Turbulence, and Electrodynamics of the Moon’s Interaction with the Sun (ARTEMIS) mission, located in the solar wind, in order to understand the formation mechanism of the cold and dense plasma sheet (CDPS). MMS detected two CDPSs composed of two ion populations with different energies, where the energy of the cold ion population is the same as that of the solar wind measured by ARTEMIS. This feature directly indicates that the CDPSs are caused by the solar wind entry. In addition, He+ was observed 3 3 in the CDPSs. The plasma density in these two CDPSs are ~1.8 cm− and ~10 cm− , respectively, roughly 4–30 times the average value of a plasma sheet. We performed a cross-correlation analysis on the ion density of the CDPS and the solar wind, and we found that it takes 3.7–5.9 h for the solar wind to enter the plasma sheet.
  • 3 the Magnetosphere 3-1 Formation of the Magnetosphere and Magnetospheric Plasma Regime

    3 the Magnetosphere 3-1 Formation of the Magnetosphere and Magnetospheric Plasma Regime

    3 The Magnetosphere 3-1 Formation of the Magnetosphere and Magnetospheric Plasma Regime OBARA Takahiro The Earth's magnetosphere is formed by the plasma flow from the Sun; i.e. solar wind. This solar wind particle can enter the magnetosphere through non-MHD processes and pro- duces specific regions of plasma. This is due to the convection motion seen in the magne- tosphere. An enhancement of the magnetospheric convection causes storms and sub- storms in the magnetosphere. Highly energetic particles can be produced through very effi- cient acceleration processes during the storms. In this paper we describe the fundamental physics of the magnetosphere, aiming a transition of researches to the Space Weather fore- cast. Keywords Magnetosphere, Plasma, Magnetospheric convection, Storms and substorms, Ener- getic particles 1 Outline of the Formation of the in the southern hemisphere. Magnetosphere and the Mag- There is an influx of solar wind plasma netospheric Plasma Structure particles in the lobe region. The area of the lobe near the magnetopause is referred to as The magnetosphere is a distinct region in the mantle. The magnetic field intensity is space surrounding the Earth, and its structure low near the equatorial plane, where the north- has been the subject of numerous detailed ern and southern lobes meet. Hot plasma satellite observations. Fig.1 shows a represen- accumulates in this region, referred to as the tation of this structure, with the upper front plasma sheet. Characteristic plasma regimes quarter removed to show the interior. The are present near the Earth, with plasma with Earth is at the center, and the solar wind flows higher energies relative to the plasma sheet.
  • Space Physics Handout 2 : the Earth's Magnetosphere And

    Space Physics Handout 2 : the Earth's Magnetosphere And

    Space Physics Handout 2 : The Earth’s magnetosphere and ionosphere The previous handout discussed the highly conducting plasma which the Sun emits, known as the solar wind. This highly conducting plasma travels at supersonic speeds of about 500 km/s as a result of the supersonic expansion of the solar corona. As a result of this plasma being highly conductive, the solar wind magnetic field is frozen into the plasma (something we will discuss and derive in the lectures). The implication of this is that when the solar wind encounters the dipolar magnetic field of the Earth, that it simply cannot penetrate through it and what happens is that it is slowed down and to a large extent deflected around it. Since the solar wind hits the obstacle (the Earth’s magnetic field) at supersonic speeds, a shock wave is formed, which is known as the bow shock. At this bow shock the solar wind plasma is slowed down and a substantial fraction of the kinetic energy of the particles is converted into thermal energy. The region of thermalised subsonic plasma behind the bow shock is called the magnetosheath. The magnetosheath plasma is denser and hotter than the solar wind plasma and the magnetic field values are higher in this region compared to out in the solar wind. The shocked solar wind plasma in the magnetosheath cannot easily penetrate the Earth’s magnetic field and is deflected around it. The boundary separating the two different regions is called the magnetopause and the cavity generated by the solar wind interaction with the Earth’s magnetic field is known as the magnetosphere.
  • Temperature Variations in the Dayside Magnetosheath and Their

    Temperature Variations in the Dayside Magnetosheath and Their

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics RESEARCH ARTICLE Temperature variations in the dayside magnetosheath 10.1002/2016JA023729 and their dependence on ion-scale magnetic structures: Key Points: THEMIS statistics and measurements by MMS • A positive correlation exists between the amplitude of magnetic fluctuations and temperature A. P. Dimmock1 , A. Osmane1 , T. I. Pulkkinen1 , K. Nykyri2 , and E. Kilpua3 variation • Temperature fluctuations are strongly 1 associated with larger local in Department of Electronics and Nanoengineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland, 2 ion-scale magnetic structures than Centre for Space and Atmospheric Research, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA, the fluid input at the shock 3Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland • The amplitude of ion gyroscale fluctuations and in situ temperature variations are favored by the Abstract The magnetosheath contains an array of waves, instabilities, and nonlinear magnetic dawn flank structures which modify global plasma properties by means of various wave-particle interactions. The present work demonstrates that ion-scale magnetic field structures (∼0.2–0.5 Hz) observed in the dayside Correspondence to: A. P. Dimmock, magnetosheath are statistically correlated to ion temperature changes on orders 10–20% of the andrew.dimmock@aalto.fi background value. In addition, our statistical analysis implies that larger temperature changes are in equipartition to larger amplitude magnetic structures. This effect was more pronounced behind the Citation: quasi-parallel bow shock and during faster solar wind speeds. The study of two separate intervals suggests Dimmock, A. P., A. Osmane, that this effect can result from both local and external drivers.
  • Predominance of ECH Wave Contribution to Diffuse Aurora in Earth's Outer Magnetosphere

    Predominance of ECH Wave Contribution to Diffuse Aurora in Earth's Outer Magnetosphere

    UCLA UCLA Previously Published Works Title Predominance of ECH wave contribution to diffuse aurora in Earth's outer magnetosphere Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8fx1f8cz Journal Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 120(1) ISSN 2169-9380 Authors Zhang, XJ Angelopoulos, V Ni, B et al. Publication Date 2015 DOI 10.1002/2014JA020455 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics RESEARCH ARTICLE Predominance of ECH wave contribution to diffuse 10.1002/2014JA020455 aurora in Earth’s outer magnetosphere Key Points: Xiao-Jia Zhang1,2, Vassilis Angelopoulos1, Binbin Ni3, and Richard M. Thorne2 • The role of ECH waves in driving fi diffuse aurora is quanti ed globally 1Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences and Institute of Geophysics and Space Physics, University of California, • ECH waves are the dominant driver of 2 diffuse aurora in the outer Los Angeles, California, USA, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, 3 magnetosphere California, USA, Department of Space Physics, School of Electronic Information, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China • Relative contribution of high-latitude precipitation decreases in active times Abstract Due to its importance for global energy dissipation in the ionosphere, the diffuse aurora has been intensively studied in the past 40 years. Its origin (precipitation of 0.5–10 keV electrons from the Correspondence to: plasma sheet without potential acceleration) has been generally attributed to whistler-mode chorus wave X.-J. Zhang, scattering in the inner magnetosphere (R < ~8 RE), while the scattering mechanism beyond that distance [email protected] remains unresolved.
  • On the Relationship of the Plasmapause to the Equatorward

    On the Relationship of the Plasmapause to the Equatorward

    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 87, NO. All, PAGES 9059-9069, NOVEMBER l, 1982 On the Relationship of the Plasmapauseto the Equatorward Boundary of the Auroral Oval and to the Inner Edge of the Plasma Sheet J. L. HORWlTZ,1 W. K. Co• 2 C R BAUGHER,3 C R. CHAPPELL3 L A FRANK,4 T. E. EASTMAN,4 R. R. ANDERSON,4 E.G. SHELLEY,5 AND D. T. YOUNG6 ISEE 1 observations of the plasmapause are compared with simultaneous observations of the electron plasma sheet and also the auroral oval observed in DMSP photographs. Only a limited amount of appropriate data was available for the comparisons: the plasmapause/plasmasheet inner edge comparisonswere restricted to the early and late morning sectors, while there were two satisfactory comparisons of the plasmapauseand the equatorward boundary of the auroral oval in the evening sector. However, these examples indicate that the plasmapauselocation often coincides to within zXL- 0.1-0.2 with both the plasma sheet inner boundary and the field line threading the equatorward boundary of the auroral oval. This co-location of the plasmapauseand the plasma sheet inner edge may be due to shielding of the magnetosphericconvection electric field by an Alfv6n layer located at the inner edge of the plasma sheet as discussedby Jaggi and Wolf (1973) and others. INTRODUCTION sheet population and inhomogeneous ionospheric electrical The locations of both the plasmapauseand the earthward conductivities together cause a modification of the magneto- edge of the plasma sheet are sensitive indicators of large- spheric electric field distribution in which the earthward scale magnetospheric convection electric fields [Axford, edge of the plasma sheet coincides with an 'Alfv6n layer' 1969].
  • A Review of Recent Studies on Coronal Dynamics: Streamers, Coronal Mass Ejections, and Their Interactions

    A Review of Recent Studies on Coronal Dynamics: Streamers, Coronal Mass Ejections, and Their Interactions

    Review Progress of Projects Supported by NSFC May 2013 Vol.58 No.14: 15991624 Geophysics doi: 10.1007/s11434-013-5669-6 A review of recent studies on coronal dynamics: Streamers, coronal mass ejections, and their interactions CHEN Yao Institute of Space Sciences and School of Space Science and Physics, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China Received October 8, 2012; accepted December 25, 2012; published online March 26, 2013 In this article I present a review of recent studies on coronal dynamics, including research progresses on the physics of coronal streamers that are the largest structure in the corona, physics of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that may cause a global disturb- ance to the corona, as well as physics of CME-streamer interactions. The following topics will be discussed in depth: (1) accelera- tion of the slow wind flowing around the streamer considering the effect of magnetic flux tube curvature; (2) physical mechanism accounting for persistent releases of streamer blobs and diagnostic results on the temporal variability of the slow wind speed with such events; (3) force balance analysis and energy release mechanism of CMEs with a flux rope magnetohydrodynamic model; (4) statistical studies on magnetic islands along the coronal-ray structure behind a CME and the first observation of magnetic island coalescence with associated electron acceleration; and (5) white light and radio manifestations of CME-streamer interactions. These studies shed new light on the physics of coronal streamers, the acceleration of the slow wind, the physics of solar eruptions, the physics of magnetic reconnection and associated electron acceleration, the large-scale coronal wave phenomenon, as well as the physics accounting for CME shock-induced type II radio bursts.