DOCSLIB.ORG

The Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies: Ethnography As Method

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies: Ethnography As Method Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies Volume 21 Article 10 January 2008 Comparative Theology, Comparative Religion, and Hindu-Christian Studies: Ethnography as Method Kristin Bloomer Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/jhcs Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Bloomer, Kristin (2008) "Comparative Theology, Comparative Religion, and Hindu-Christian Studies: Ethnography as Method," Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies: Vol. 21, Article 10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7825/2164-6279.1409 The Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies is a publication of the Society for Hindu-Christian Studies. The digital version is made available by Digital Commons @ Butler University. For questions about the Journal or the Society, please contact [email protected]. For more information about Digital Commons @ Butler University, please contact [email protected]. Bloomer: Comparative Theology, Comparative Religion, and Hindu-Christian Studies: Ethnography as Method Comparative Theology, Comparative Religion, and Hindu-Christian Studies: Ethnography as Method Kristin Bloomer University of Hawaii CONCERNS that likely inspired today's panel disciplines; and some confusion over attempts to can be traced textually to the beginnings of understand the boundaries of religion itself, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and to the partiCUlarly since Talal Asad's critique of earliest writings of what we now call Hinduism. Clifford Geertz,l a matter I will explore shortly. In the field of Hindu-Christian studies, these F or these and other reasons, both theologians concerns suggest ethnographic approaches that (Christian theologians in particular) and are not in themselves new, but which borrow in comparativists have been worrying over who potentially new ways from the methodological they are, what they are doing, and how they can tool-boxes of anthropology, theology and the be responsibly more responsive to the ever­ history of religions. "more-impressive fact of religious plurality. A quick perusal of academic journal entries Before trying to take a stab, first, at defining over the past twenty years shows growing "what" comparative theology might mean today, attention to questions such as "What is I want to try to understand it historically­ comparative theology?" and "What is the particularly since I agree with Asad that the comparative study of religion?" (These broad concept "religion" exists only as a historical questions suggest a sub-question, the topic of construct/ as does "comparative theology," this panel: "What is Hindu-Christian Studies, "comparative religion," "Hindu-Christian and how best might we do it?") Reasons for the studies," or any term for that matter. Which growing attention to such questions about practices and concepts we subsume under comparison are multiple. They include the "religion," or "theology" or "comparative pressures of globalization and, with them, a theology" depends, of course, on our theories, growing market-academic" and popular-for our experience, our worldviews-all of which studies and stories that deal with phenomena are shaped by discursive processes and events of related to globalization. Other reasons include a history. To understand something about the healthy self-doubt that has arisen generally in history of comparative theology, then, will help the humanities, particularly in the study of us see: first, how it, like any other term or religion among theologians and historians of practice, is a historical product of discursive religion. This self-consciousness arises from at processes; how, as such a,product, it is open to least four comers: the loss of objectivity that has the force of change; and how theologians and accompanied postmodernism; a post-colonial scholars of religion-themselves discursive anxiety regarding the study of non-Western subj ects working within the process of such religions; a post-Enlightenment concern about change, conditioned by the limits of its history whether theology, in particular, can or should be and the perceived needs of the moment-can considered an academic discipline at all, housed best correlate their work to these needs while under the same roof as other, more "scientific" trying to maintain a sense of integrity. Kristin C. Bloomer is an Assistant Professor of Religion at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Her dissertation, Making Mary: Hinduism, Roman Catholicism and Spirit Poss~ssion in Tamil Nadu, South India (University of Chicago, 2008), is an ethnography of Marian possession rituals in India's most south­ eastern state. Her areas of specialization include the anthropology of religion, religion and the body, self and subjectivity in the study of religion, and Christianity in India. Journal ofHindu-Christian Studies 21 (2008):33-42 Published by Digital Commons @ Butler University, 2008 1 Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies, Vol. 21 [2008], Art. 10 34 Kristin Bloomer In a 1987 Encyclopedia of Religion article is, reflection on "other religions"-have been under the heading "Theology: Comparative present in the Christian tradition since its Theology," David Tracy points out that although beginnings, both in the philosophical traditions the work of comparative religion goes back to of Greece and Rome and in the Hebrew our very beginnings as humans-at least as far traditions of ancient Israel. These comparative back as the moment when the first worshipper of elements can be traced in leanings both positive a god or gods asked herself why her neighbor is (in terms of borrowing) and negative a worshipper of some other god or gods­ (exclusivism, tendencies to demonize).4 comparative work of any sustained scholarly The emergence of the very notion of religion fashion goes back, in traditional Western in Europe, furthermore, has been outlined by theologies and philosophies, at least as far as the Talal Asad, Eric Sharpe, .and Samuel J. Preus, beginnings of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. 3 whose book Explaining Religion: Criticism and Among other traditions, especially in India, Theory from Bodin to Freud traces a narrative of Tracy points out, the scholarly work of religious displacement in which religion as it is studied in comparison has been going on much longer still the human sciences is increasingly separated and with great philosophical sophistication from theology. Denying the possibility of (Surendranath Dasgupta, A History of Indian transcendence arid replacing it with a naturalistic Philosophy, 5 vols., Cambridge, 1922-1955). paradigm, scholars of religion increasingly Despite the rich history of philosophical and adopted a critical outlook towards their object of theological scholarly work in India and the study and removed from it any appeal to a vibrant theological work being carried out there transcendent God. Key players in this paradigm as well as in other countries and traditions, one shift as Preus lists them are Bernard Fontenelle, of the greatest problems with the term David Hume, Immanuel Kant, Friedrich "theology" today is that it is still generally Schleiermacher, Emile Durkheim, E.B. Tylor, assumed to mean "Christian, Western theology," and Sigmund Freud, among others. at least within the confines of the Western Of these men, Schleiermacher, a Reformed academy. For the purposes of this paper, both theologian, is particularly key to the because of and in spite of this tendency-and for development of the study of religion as a human reasons of space-I will focus on the history of science-or particularly, at least, for theology. comparison within Christianity. Furthermore, Theologians such as Keith WardS, James while theologies of Islam, Hinduism and Fredericks6 and others have pointed out the Buddhism (though some Buddhist philosophical extent of Schleiermacher's influence on the treatises might better be described as a­ contemporary, comparative study of religion, theologies) have contributed significantly to the particularly on liberal theology and its claim to a formation of Christian theologies, it is Christian universal religious experience. theology that has most directly influenced the Schleiermacher's apparent appeal to a universal forination of the academic study of religion in core linking together all religions, first (On the so-called West. Religion: Speeches to Its Cultured Despisers, While the term "comparative theology" has 1799) in the sense of an intuition, sense or received a fair amount of cache in recent years, feeling of the infinite/ and in later writings Christian theology, I would argue (along with (Glaubenslehre, or The Christian Faith, 1821) others such as David Tracy, Keith Ward, Francis as a feeling of absolute dependence,8 has been X .. Clooney, Eric Sharpe), has always been used as a basis for arguing for the comparative. Furthermore, it has always "transcendental unity" of all religions-an struggled to define itself in relation to other argument which has been shown to be highly disciplines, and with the notion of how problematic. Nonetheless, this transcendental scientifically or normatively neutral it can or unity has served, as a cornerstone for much should be. Tracy reminds us in his modem thought about religion and can be seen Encyclopedia of Religion entry that while the in works of authors including Rudolph Otto, term "comparative theology" was not used in the Ernst Troeltsch, Mircea Eliade, Bernard premodern period, comparative elements-that Lonergan, Huston Smith, Wilfred Cantwell https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/jhcs/vol21/iss1/10 DOI: 10.7825/2164-6279.1409
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Point of Departure of Fundamental Theology
    Teresianum 45 (1994/2) 439-455 THE POINT OF DEPARTURE OF FUNDAMENTAL THEOLOGY EDWIN DINIZ The course of fundamental theology is still subject to morphological changes and the various endeavours in the course of the history of theology show, that this course still re­ mains to be defined, if it is to be defined at all. Attempts have been made in this brief reflection to give a short historical glimpse on the subject and then to decipher its identity in the context of theological studies. Finally, without entering the field of the scope or aim of fundamental theology, attention has been concentrated on the point of de­ parture in the study of fundamental theology. Historical Glimpse The expression «fundamental theology» can lead one to think in different directions1 with various meanings, but it has certainly nothing to do with «fundamentalism».2 The fun­ damental theology is engaged in giving a justification for the faith in front of human reason and in the course of the his- 1 There are sufficient indications of literature in this field, given by M a x S e c k l e r , Fundamentaltheologie: Aufgaben und Aufbau, Begriff und Na­ men. in «Handbuch der Fundamentaltheologie» Bd. IV, pg. 513-514. See al­ so Pie’ i N i n o t , Tratado de Teologia Fundamental. ‘Dar razon de la esperanza’ (I. Pe. 3, 13), Salamanca, 1989, pg. 26-54.. 2 Regarding this argument of «fundamentalism» Cfr. K l a u s K ie n z l e r , Der neue Fundamentalismus, Duesseldorf, 1 9 9 0 ; W o l f g a n g R e i n e r t , Katholi­ scher Fundamentalismus, Regensburg, 1 9 9 1 ; C h r is t ia n J a e g g i and D a v id J .
    [Show full text]
  • Marquette History of Theology
    MARQUETTE HISTORY OF THEOLOGY VOLUME II: LATE MEDIEVAL TO 1800 Edited by Patrick Carey In Collaboration With Michel René Barnes Alexander Golitzin Mickey Mattox Marcus Wriedt David Schultenover Wanda Zemler-Cizewski 1 CONTENTS SECTION I: LATE MEDIEVAL THEOLOGY, 1350-1500 Jean Gerson ............................................................ 1 On Mystical Theology .............................................. 2 Jean Gerson: Selections from A Deo exivit, Contra curiositatem studentium and De mystica theologia speculativa, ed. and trans. Steven E. Ozment, Textus Minores, vol. 38 (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1969), 47–73, 85–89. Gabriel Biel ........................................................... 13 The Circumcision of the Lord ....................................... 14 Heiko Augustinus Oberman, Forerunners of the Reformation: The Shape of Late Medieval Thought (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966), 165–74. Desiderius Erasmus ..................................................... 22 The Praise of Folly ................................................ 23 Karl F. Thompson, ed., Middle Ages, Renaissance, and Reformation, 3rd ed., Classics of Western Thought, vol. 2 (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1980), 286–302. Excerpts from Desiderius Erasmus, The Praise of Folly, trans. by Hoyt Hopewell Hudson (copyright 1941 © 1969 by Princeton University Press; Princeton Paperback, 1970), 16–125. SECTION II: BYZANTINE CHURCH, 1350-1800 Nicholas Cabasilas ...................................................... 36 The Life in Christ ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Studies (RELS) 1
    Religious Studies (RELS) 1 RELS 108 — Hinduism Course count: 1 RELIGIOUS STUDIES (RELS) An examination of Hinduism and the Hindu tradition from the Vedas to the present day. Among the subject considered: the Upanishads; RELS 101 — Intro to the Comparative Study of Religion Course count: 1 the Ramayana and Mahabharata; village Hinduism; Gandhi; and Introduction to the nature and place of religion in the human experience contemporary Hindu political thought. Evaluation will include both as critically understood through the modern disciplines of comparative examinations and essays. history, text criticism, and social science. Viewpoints covered include the psychoanalytic, philosophical, biological, artistic, and anthropological. GPA units: 1 Sources range broadly from the Bible to modern fiction, Lao Tzu to Celtic Common Area: Cross-Cultural Studies, Studies in Religion myths. The course also examines the effects of modern change on Typically Offered: Annually religion in global perspective. RELS 114 — Introduction To Theology Course count: 1 GPA units: 1 Introduction to major claims in Christian theology through a close Common Area: Cross-Cultural Studies, Studies in Religion examination of historical and contemporary Catholic and Protestant Typically Offered: Alternate Years theologies. Topics include: methods in doing theology and in biblical interpretation; images of God and of Jesus; the human condition; RELS 102 — Mary in Christian Theology Course count: 1 different marks and models of the church; and religious diversity. Mary, the mother of Jesus, has held great significance for Christians over Readings address the interplay in theological reflection between religious the centuries. This class will examine the following topics: Mary in the tradition and social location, and analyze the implications and challenges Scriptures, the development of Marian doctrines (the Virgin Birth, the of Christian claims in light of gender, race and poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • "Jesu Bhakta" Hindu Christian Theology
    Gospel Ferment in India among both Hindus and Christians Jesus, My Master: “Jesu Bhakta” Hindu Christian Theology by Herbert Hoefer n my last trip to India, Professor Ravi Tiwari of Gurukul Lutheran Theological College in Chennai kindly gave me a copy Oof his biography of his father, a Brahmin convert and theological professor: Yisu Das: Witness of a Convert (ISPCK, Delhi, 2000), Dr. Yisu Das, of course, was a member of the church, though—as with most non- dalit converts—he did not fit in. As I mused on the elements of Dr. Das’ theology, I started pulling together other experiences of theological thinking that I had found among “Christian Bhaktis” (as Dr. Das called himself), particularly among the non-baptized believers in Christ. At the start of Professor Tiwari’s stimulating biography, he provides the sum- mary of his father’s faith, as he had presented it to a conference in 1963. Listen to “The elements of the Christian Faith, which have appealed to me” (p. 5): 1. The presence of the living Christ. He quotes the Christian mystic Thomas a Kempis: “That man only is rich with whom Jesus delights to dwell.” 2. A person worthy of our devotion. In contrast, Dr. Das speaks of the Hindu Bhakti tradition in which “the devotees have a nobler character than the gods they wor- ship.” I am reminded of the anthropological axiom: People become like the gods they worship. 3. Jesus’ teaching of God as our personal Father. “This teaching has given to Christian prayer simplicity, directness, dignity, which is seldom found elsewhere.” 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory in the Study of Religion
    Chapter 3 Theory in the Study of Religion Donald Wiebe My aim in this paper is to assess the role of theory in ‘religious studies.’1 The task is a general one and will not concern itself with evaluating any specific theory or theories of religion but rather with the appropriateness of the very notion of ‘a theory of religion.’ It will not, however, be an easy undertaking, not only because of its generality but also because of its paradoxical character. To admit of the existence of theories of religion and yet raise the question of the ‘possibility’ of such theories is somewhat odd to say the least. The history of the study of religion, I suggest however, forces us both to the admission and to the question. 1 The Place of ‘Theory’ in Religious Studies The place of theory in ‘religious studies’ has had a rather chequered history. Theory, it seems, lies at the centre of the formation of this so-called ‘new sci- ence’ in the form of what Eric Sharpe in his history of the ‘discipline’ refers to as the ‘Darwinian-Spencerian theory of evolution.’ In concluding a survey of the antecedents of ‘comparative religion’ (i.e. the ‘new science of religion’ of Max Müller) he writes: … with Comte, Darwin and Spencer we have come to the threshold of the hundred years of comparative religion which we are to survey. We have seen something of the variety of approaches to the religions of mankind which could be held before the coming of evolutionism: the Christian 1 My attention in this paper will be focused primarily on the emergence of the study of religion as an academic discipline (i.e., a ‘university subject’) with the rise of the ‘phenomenologists.’ The ‘phenomenologists,’ I would argue, constitute a dominant tradition in the history of the scholarly study of religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Interreligious Dialogue, Comparative Theology and the Alterity of Hindu
    Interreligious Dialogue, Comparative Theology and the Alterity of Hindu Thought Abstract A key question at the heart of contemporary debates over interreligious dialogue is whether the Christian partner in such conversations should view her interlocutors through the lens of Christian descriptions or whether any such imaging amounts to a form of Christian imperialism. We look at the responses to this question from certain contemporary forms of ‘particularism’ which regard religious universes as densely knit, and sometimes incommensurable, systems of meanings, so that they usually deny the significance, or even the possibility, of modes of Bible preaching such as apologetics. While these concerns over the alterity of other religious traditions are often viewed as specifically postmodern, two Scotsmen in British India, J.N. Farquhar (1861–1929) and A.G. Hogg (1875–1954), struggled exactly a hundred years ago with a version of this question vis-à-vis the religious universe of Vedāntic Hinduism and responded to it in a manner that has striking resemblances to ‘particularism’. We shall argue that Hogg can be seen as an early practitioner of a form of ‘comparative theology’ which emerges in his case, on the one hand, through a textual engagement with specific problems thrown up in interreligious spaces but, on the other hand, also seeks to present a reasoned defence of Christian doctrinal statements. We shall note a crucial difference between his comparative theological encounters and contemporary practitioners of the same – while the latter are usually wary of speaking of any ‘common ground’ in interreligious encounters, Hogg regarded the presuppositions of the Christian faith as the basis of such encounters.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity - 2012 Catherine Cornille Boston College
    Santa Clara University Scholar Commons Santa Clara Lectures Lectures 2-14-2012 Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity - 2012 Catherine Cornille Boston College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/sc_lectures Recommended Citation Cornille, Catherine, "Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity - 2012" (2012). Santa Clara Lectures. 1. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/sc_lectures/1 This Lecture is brought to you for free and open access by the Lectures at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Lectures by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2012 SANTA CLARA LECTURE CATHERINE CORNILLE SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY FEBRUARY 14, 2012 2012 Santa Clara Lecture Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity Catherine Cornille, Boston College Santa Clara University, February 14, 2012 In the context of burgeoning religious plurality, experiences of multiple religious belonging or hybrid religious identities have become increasingly reported and noted. Throughout the Western world, pockets of people have come to cheerfully claim to being both Christian and Hindu, or Buddhist and Jewish, or any combination of two and sometimes more religious identities. A classical example of this may be found in the figure of the Christian theologian, Raimon Panikkar, who, returning from a visit to India, famously claimed that: “I ‘left’ a Christian, ‘discovered’ myself a Hindu, ‘returned’ a Buddhist, all the while remaining a ‘Christian.’”1 This enigmatic statement encapsulates a world of meaning which gradually comes to light in reading his oeuvre. Another Christian theologian, Paul Knitter, recently published a book titled Without the Buddha, I Could Not Be a Christian (London: Oneworld, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Interrogating the Comparative Method: Whither, Why, and How?1
    religions Article Interrogating the Comparative Method: Whither, Why, and How?1 Barbara A. Holdrege Department of Religious Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3130, USA; [email protected] Received: 15 January 2018; Accepted: 26 January 2018; Published: 12 February 2018 Abstract: This essay seeks to illuminate the problematics, methods, and dynamics of comparison by interrogating how certain analytical categories in the study of religion, such as scripture and the body, can be fruitfully reimagined through a comparative analysis of their Hindu and Jewish instantiations. I consider a range of issues that are critical to any productive comparative study, and I reflect more specifically on the principal components of my own comparative method in light of Oliver Freiberger’s analytical framework: the goals of comparative analysis; the modes of comparison; the parameters that define the scope and the scale of the comparative inquiry; and the operations involved in the comparative process, beginning with selection of the specific traditions and analytical categories to be addressed and formulation of the organizational design of the study and culminating in the re-visioned categories and models in the study of religion that constitute the fruits of the comparative inquiry. Keywords: comparative method; analytical categories; models of religious tradition; Hinduisms; Judaisms; Hindu-Jewish comparative studies; scripture; body; Veda; Torah Jonathan Z. Smith, in his 1982 essay “In Comparison a Magic Dwells,” surveys and critiques four basic modes of comparison—ethnographic, encyclopedic, morphological, and evolutionary— together with their more recent variants, and concludes that none of the proposed methods is adequate. Yet he suggests that the comparative enterprise should not thereby be abandoned, for the process of comparison is a constitutive aspect of human thought and is critical to the task of the scholar of religion.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO PUBLIC CATHOLICISM AND RELIGIOUS PLURALISM IN AMERICA: THE ADAPTATION OF A RELIGIOUS CULTURE TO THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF DIVERSITY, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by Michael J. Agliardo, SJ Committee in charge: Professor Richard Madsen, Chair Professor John H. Evans Professor David Pellow Professor Joel Robbins Professor Gershon Shafir 2008 Copyright Michael J. Agliardo, SJ, 2008 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Michael Joseph Agliardo is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2008 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ......................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents......................................................................................................................iv List Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................vi List of Graphs ......................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................. viii Vita.............................................................................................................................................x
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on Diversity: As a Subfield of Religious Studies, the Study of Comparative Mysticism Has Been Dominated by Male White Western Scholars Since Its Inception
    California Institute of Integral Studies EWP9566: ADVANCED Ph.D. SEMINAR: COMPARATIVE MYSTICISM Spring 2014 (3 units) Thursdays 3:00pm-6:00pm (Jan 30-Mar 13; Mar 27-May 1); Saturday 10-5pm (May 10) Instructor: Jorge N. Ferrer, PhD. Tel. (415) 575-6262; email: [[email protected]]. Course Description: In the spirit of dialogue and inquiry, this advanced seminar provides an in-depth exploration of the field of comparative mysticism. After discussing the various meanings of the term “mysticism,” an overview of the field of comparative mysticism and its methodological foundations will be offered. We will discuss the major horizons of the field, as well as the main families of interpretive models in the field: typological, perennialist, constructivist, feminist, neo-perennialist, evolutionary, contextualist, postmodern, pluralist, and participatory. Topical sessions will address five contemporary areas of inquiry in the study of mysticism: (1) the intermonastic dialogue, (2) mysticism and gender, (3) embodiment and erotic mysticism, (4) the ethics of mysticism, and (5) psychedelic research and mystical experience. Students select two mystical traditions, authors, notions or phenomena and compare them applying one of the models studied or their own comparative approach. Students are encouraged to approach the study of mystics and mystical texts from an empathic, participatory, and contemplative perspective. Summary of Educational Purpose: The main purpose of this course is to deepen students’ knowledge of classic and contemporary approaches to the study of mystical phenomena and comparative mysticism. An additional objective is to guide students in the selection of the most appropriate comparative approach for their research interests. Learning Objectives: After completing this course, students will be able to: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Rearticulations of Enmity and Belonging in Postwar Sri Lanka
    BUDDHIST NATIONALISM AND CHRISTIAN EVANGELISM: REARTICULATIONS OF ENMITY AND BELONGING IN POSTWAR SRI LANKA by Neena Mahadev A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland October, 2013 © 2013 Neena Mahadev All Rights Reserved Abstract: Based on two years of fieldwork in Sri Lanka, this dissertation systematically examines the mutual skepticism that Buddhist nationalists and Christian evangelists express towards one another in the context of disputes over religious conversion. Focusing on the period from the mid-1990s until present, this ethnography elucidates the shifting politics of nationalist perception in Sri Lanka, and illustrates how Sinhala Buddhist populists have increasingly come to view conversion to Christianity as generating anti-national and anti-Buddhist subjects within the Sri Lankan citizenry. The author shows how the shift in the politics of identitarian perception has been contingent upon several critical events over the last decade: First, the death of a Buddhist monk, which Sinhala Buddhist populists have widely attributed to a broader Christian conspiracy to destroy Buddhism. Second, following the 2004 tsunami, massive influxes of humanitarian aid—most of which was secular, but some of which was connected to opportunistic efforts to evangelize—unsettled the lines between the interested religious charity and the disinterested secular giving. Third, the closure of 25 years of a brutal war between the Sri Lankan government forces and the ethnic minority insurgent group, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), has opened up a slew of humanitarian criticism from the international community, which Sinhala Buddhist populist activists surmise to be a product of Western, Christian, neo-colonial influences.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading List in Theory and Method for Religious Studies 12.15.09 Asad
    Reading List in Theory and Method for Religious Studies 12.15.09 Asad, Talal, Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993). Bell, Catherine, Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992). Berger, Peter L., The Sacred Canopy: Elements of sociological theory of religion, (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1969). Doniger, Wendy, The Implied Spider: Politics and Theology in Myth (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998). Douglas, Mary, Purity and Danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo (London; New York: Routledge, 1994). Durkheim, Émile, The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, trans. Carol Cosman (Oxford New York: Oxford University Press, 2001). Eliade, Mircea, Patterns in Comparative Religion, trans. Rosemary Sheed (Cleveland, World Pub. Co., 1966). Freud, Sigmund, The Future of an Illusion, trans. and ed. James Strachey (New York: Norton, 1961). Freud, Sigmund, Totem and Taboo: Some points of agreement between the mental lives of savages and neurotics, trans. James Strachey (London: Routledge, 2001). Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (New York: Basic Books, 1973). Hewitt, Marsha. Critical Theory of Religion: A Feminist Analysis (Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 1995). James, William, The Varieties of Religious Experience (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985). Levy-Strauss, Claude. Tristes Tropiques Lincoln, Bruce, Theorizing Myth: Narrative, ideology, and scholarship (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999). Luckman, Thomas. The Invisible Religion (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1967). Malinowski, Bronislaw, Magic, Science, and Religion, and other essays (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1954). Marx, Karl and F. Engels, Marx and Engels on Religion (Moscow, Foreign Languages Pub.
    [Show full text]