Outstanding Public Interest Lawyers in Action II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Outstanding Public Interest Lawyers in Action II Outstanding Public Interest Lawyers in Action II: A Day in the Life of Wasserstein Fellows Lisa D. Williams, Esq. Associate Director Micah Nemiroff Staff Assistant Bernard Koteen Office of Public Interest Advising Harvard Law School Wasserstein Hall, Suite 4039 Cambridge, MA 02138 Phone: 617-495-3108 Fax: 617-496-4944 WASSERSTEIN GUIDE GOVERNMENT – FEDERAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 19 Alden Abbott 2002-2003 Wasserstein Fellow INTRODUCTION Assistant Director for Policy and Evaluation, Bureau of Competition, CAPITOL Hill Federal Trade Commission 6 Philip S. Barnett 21 Gerald Alexander 2011-2012 Wasserstein Fellow 2008-2009 Wasserstein Fellow Democratic Staff Director, Assistant General Counsel, Committee on Energy and Office of Litigation, Commerce, U.S. House of U.S. Department of Housing and Representatives Urban Development CRIMINAL PROSECUTION/DEFENSE 22 Darryl Gorman 2006-2007 Wasserstein Fellow 9 Carol Brook Deputy Attorney General, 2005-2006 Wasserstein Fellow Rulemaking and Legislative Affairs Deputy Director, Federal Defender Office of the Attorney General Program for the Northern District of Illinois 22 Lisa Taylor 2011-2012 Wasserstein Fellow 13 James Hingeley Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of 2008-2009 Wasserstein Fellow Justice, Civil Rights Division, Public Defender, Albemarle County Disability Rights Section and Charlottesville and City of Lynchburg GOVERNMENT – LOCAL 14 Asit Panwala 24 Astrid Andre 2006-2007 Wasserstein Fellow 2006-2007 Wasserstein Fellow Assistant District Attorney Counsel, New York City Economic San Francisco County District Development Corporation Attorney’s Office 25 Michael Best 16 Jordan Schreiber 2009-2010 Wasserstein Fellow 2006-2007 Wasserstein Fellow General Counsel, New York City Deputy Public Defender Department of Education Contra Costa County, Office of the Public Defender LEGAL SERVICES 17 Jack Smith 26 Davida Finger 2011-2012 Wasserstein Fellow 2008-2009 Wasserstein Fellow Chief, U.S. Department of Justice, Staff Attorney Criminal Division, Public Integrity Katrina Clinic, Loyola Law School Section Outstanding Public Interest Lawyers in Action II Page 2 39 Steven Choi 27 Levon Henry 2009-2010 Wasserstein Fellow 2008-2009 Wasserstein Fellow Executive Director, Empowering the Executive Director Korean American Community DNA-People’s Legal Services, Inc. (YKASEC) 28 Bill Lienhard 41 James D. Esseks 2007-2008 Wasserstein Fellow 2008-2009 Wasserstein Fellow Project Director Litigation Director, ACLU, Lesbian, Mental Health Project, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender & AIDS Urban Justice Center Project 30 Nina Perales 42 Hayley Gorenberg 2009-2010 Wasserstein Fellow 2010-2011 Wasserstein Fellow Southwest Regional Counsel Deputy Director, Lambda Legal Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) 43 Blan Holman 2009-2010 Wasserstein Fellow NONPROFIT Senior Attorney, Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) 30 Paul Achitoff 2006-2007 Wasserstein Fellow 45 Michael Kirkpatrick Managing Attorney 2007-2008 Wasserstein Fellow Earthjustice, Hawaii Staff Lawyer, Public Citizen Litigation Group 32 Jody Adler 2011-2012 Wasserstein Fellow 45 Craig Levine Director, Law Project, Chicago 2006-2007 Wasserstein Fellow Lawyer’s Committee for Civil Rights Senior Counsel & Policy Director, New Jersey Institute for Social 33 John Affeldt Justice 2011-2012 Wasserstein Fellow Managing Attorney 47 Michael LeVine Public Advocates Inc. 2011-2012 Wasserstein Fellow Pacific Senior Counsel, Oceana 36 Neelum Arya 2011-2012 Wasserstein Fellow 48 Andrea Marsh Research & Policy Director, 2005-2006 Wasserstein Fellow Campaign for Youth Justice Director, Texas Fair Defense Project 38 Eric Brettschneider 50 William R. Montross, Jr. 2005-2006 Wasserstein Fellow 2007-2008 Wasserstein Fellow Executive Director Director – Capital Litigation Agenda for Children Tomorrow Southern Center for Human Rights (ACT) Outstanding Public Interest Lawyers in Action II Page 3 52 Jonathan Rapping 2009-2010 Wasserstein Fellow 66 Nicole Austin Hillery CEO/Founder 2006-2007 Wasserstein Fellow The Southern Public Defender Attorney Training Center (SPDTC) Mehri & Skalet, PLLC 53 Mario Russell PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL 2007-2008 Wasserstein Fellow Senior Attorney and Immigration 68 Betsy Apple Policy, Catholic Charities 2011-2012 Wasserstein Fellow Community Services Legal Director & General Counsel, AIDS-Free World, New York, NY 54 Reginald Shuford 2009-2010 Wasserstein Fellow 70 Mark Fittipaldi Senior Staff Attorney/Attorneys of 2008-2009 Wasserstein Fellow Color Recruitment & Retention Attorney Advisor, Officer, ACLU Racial Justice Office of the General Counsel Program United States Agency for International Development (USAID) 55 Jeanne Smoot 2011-2012 Wasserstein Fellow 71 James A. Goldston Director of Public Policy, 2009-2010 Wasserstein Fellow Tahirih Justice Center Founding Executive Director Open Society Justice Initiative 59 Michael Steinberg 2007-2008 Wasserstein Fellow 72 Clifton Johnson Legal Director 2009-2010 Wasserstein Fellow ACLU of Michigan Assistant Legal Adviser Office of the Legal Adviser (L) 60 Kara S. Suffredini Office of Law Enforcement and 2007-2008 Wasserstein Fellow Intelligence, U.S. Department of State Legislative Director, State National Gay and Lesbian Task Force 74 Kaoru Okuizumi 2010-2011 Wasserstein Fellow 63 Janet Varon Policy Coordinator, Department of 2006-2007 Wasserstein Fellow Peacekeeping Operations, United Executive Director, Nations Northwest Health Law Advocates 75 Tony Varona PRIVATE-PUBLIC INTEREST FIRMS 2001-2002 Wasserstein Fellow General Counsel & Legal Director 64 James B. Fishman Human Rights Campaign & HRC 2008-2009 Wasserstein Fellow Foundation Founder Fishman & Neil, LLP Outstanding Public Interest Lawyers in Action II Page 4 These 45 narratives, written by Harvard Law School's Wasserstein Public Interest Fellows from 2001 through 2012, are an invaluable resource to our students and to law students around the country. We have compiled these narratives to help educate students about what to expect in their professional careers and help guide them in making career choices. The Wasserstein Public Interest Fellows Program was created in 1990 in honor of Morris Wasserstein through a generous gift from his family. The program recognizes exemplary lawyers who have distinguished themselves in public interest work and who can assist students who are considering similar career paths. The program brings outstanding public interest attorneys to the Office of Public Interest Advising at Harvard Law School each year to counsel students about careers in public service. “Public interest” has been broadly defined to include law-related work for governmental agencies, legal services, prosecutors, public defenders, private public interest law firms, and nonprofit organizations that provide legal assistance, conduct research or engage in other activities aimed at advancing the common good. The Wasserstein fellows are selected by a committee appointed by the Dean of Harvard Law School because of their extraordinary careers in public interest law. The fellows’ primary commitment is to meet individually with students and advise them about public interest career options with a particular focus on their own field of specialization but will often participate in other events or activities during their time on the Harvard Law School campus such as career panels, speaking events or classroom activities. Students have been inspired and informed by these meetings because they leave with a better understanding of what to expect from a particular type of practice setting and the joys and frustrations of public interest law. The program exposes our students to a diverse group of accomplished public interest lawyers who are enthusiastic about sharing their passions with law students on how to utilize their legal education to promote social justice. Students greatly benefit from these thoughtful insights into the Wasserstein Fellows’ daily activities and it is our goal to expand the universe of students and lawyers who are enriched by these perspectives. Prior to each Wasserstein Fellow's visit, we ask him or her to prepare a narrative describing a "typical day" at their job. They invariably say that there is no "typical day" in the public interest world. These narratives capture the appeal and the essence of public interest work. We have asked the Wasserstein Fellows to allow us to share these narratives with law students and lawyers across the country because it is our hope that by reading about what different types of lawyers do, you will start the process of finding the niche that is right for you. These narratives were submitted at the time of each respective Wasserstein Fellow’s fellowship, and so may not reflect the Fellows current occupation. We are grateful to the Wasserstein Fellows for encouraging the commitment to public service and for allowing us to share these narratives and to the Wasserstein family for making this fellowship possible. Outstanding Public Interest Lawyers in Action II Page 5 CAPITOL HILL Philip S. Barnett JD, Harvard Law School, 1983 2011-12 Wasserstein Fellow Democratic Staff Director, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC One of the best aspects of working on Capitol Hill is that there are no typical days. The issues you work on change. Your role can change from negotiating bill language one day, to working with interest groups to build public support for your member’s position another day, to reviewing boxes of documents for an investigative hearing
Recommended publications
  • Tort Law Is Our Law! Catalogue
    Tort Law is Our Law! Share it for the Holidays... Winter 2018 Catalogue Holiday shopping that celebrates the Law! Tort law and trial by jury go together like the Holidays and presents. What better gift for your staff, or family and friends, than something from the American Museum of Tort Law - the Museum that celebrates the importance of trial by jury, and tort law – the branch of law that protects us all from dangerous products, and wrongful conduct. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer with Rick Newman We are pleased to invite you to look inside, where you’ll find gifts for everyone - the lawyer, your ace legal staff, the would-be lawyer, or anyone who appreciates good reads, fun items, intriguing art and especially our system of law - the greatest legal system in the world. Happy Holidays, 2018! Richard L. Newman, Esq. Executive Director “The Museum... will be of vital importance to our citizenry” - Justice Sandra Day O’Connor 3 Wearables—show your support... and start an education with a conversation! Phil Donahue (right), the celebrated talk show host and an early Founder, visited the Museum and conducted an interview with Yale Law Professor Akhil Reed Amar. September 17th, 2017 An AMTL Shirt is not just clothing or a show of support, it’s a sure-fire conversation starter... What’s Tort Law? Why a flaming car? Who are Brown and Kendall? You’re going to find out once you start wearing these shirts! Museum Logo T-Shirt $20 Black and white image of the Museum, with our name in white over a teal background.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All Rights Reserved
    Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All rights reserved. Public Citizen Foundation 1600 20th St. NW Washington, D.C. 20009 www.citizen.org ISBN: 978-1-58231-099-2 Doyle Printing, 2016 Printed in the United States of America PUBLIC CITIZEN THE SENTINEL OF DEMOCRACY CONTENTS Preface: The Biggest Get ...................................................................7 Introduction ....................................................................................11 1 Nader’s Raiders for the Lost Democracy....................................... 15 2 Tools for Attack on All Fronts.......................................................29 3 Creating a Healthy Democracy .....................................................43 4 Seeking Justice, Setting Precedents ..............................................61 5 The Race for Auto Safety ..............................................................89 6 Money and Politics: Making Government Accountable ..............113 7 Citizen Safeguards Under Siege: Regulatory Backlash ................155 8 The Phony “Lawsuit Crisis” .........................................................173 9 Saving Your Energy .................................................................... 197 10 Going Global ...............................................................................231 11 The Fifth Branch of Government................................................ 261 Appendix ......................................................................................271 Acknowledgments ........................................................................289
    [Show full text]
  • Litigation: the Future of Federal Preemption*
    LITIGATION: THE FUTURE OF FEDERAL PREEMPTION* MINUTES FROM A CONVENTION OF THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY DR. MICHAEL S. GREVE, John G. Searle Scholar, American Enter- prise Institute PROF. ALAN B. MORRISON, Lerner Family Associate Dean for Public Interest/Public Service, The George Washington University Law School PROF. CATHERINE M. SHARKEY, New York University School of Law HON. DANIEL E. TROY, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, GlaxoSmithKline HON. WILLIAM H. PRYOR JR., Moderator, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit 11-13-09 11:35 a.m.–1:45 p.m. State Ballroom * Editor’s Note: This transcript has been slightly modified from its original format to correct obvious grammatical errors. 184 2011] Litigation: The Future of Federal Preemption 185 JUDGE PRYOR: Welcome to this luncheon panel that has been organized by the Litigation Section and will address the future of federal preemption. Federal preemption of course is a recurring concern of the Su- preme Court of the United States in cases about a wide variety of economic regulations, including regulations of financial services, product safety, environmental protection, and the labeling of food and drugs. Our panel will discuss whether there is a discernable pattern in the decisions of the Supreme Court about preemption, whether and how recent changes in the membership of the Supreme Court will affect any pattern of those decisions, and whether there is a princi- pled and coherent framework that the Court should employ in this vital area of constitutional law. To discuss these matters, the Society has assembled a distinguished panel of experts. Each panelist will make an opening statement of eight to 10 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Article
    781 TRANSCRIPT - PANEL 2/28/2013 4:00 PM PANEL DISCUSSION ON RECENT U.S. SUPREME COURT FREE SPEECH DECISIONS & THE IMPLICATIONS OF THESE CASES FOR AMERICAN SOCIETY Alan B. Morrison* Susan N. Herman** Robert M. O’Neil*** Ronald K.L. Collins**** Robert D. Richards***** Adam Liptak****** MR. BENJAMIN POMERANCE: Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome back to those of you who are returning from the morning session, returning from lunch. And welcome for the first time to those of you who are joining us for the first time today. We are very glad and very proud to have such a good turnout for an excellent afternoon discussion about free speech issues past and present. Before we begin the afternoon discussion, it is my pleasure to turn the work of giving the introductions over to someone who is new to our Albany Law School community, but someone who has already established a very positive reputation with the Law Review and with the entire student body. We are thrilled to have her here today: Albany Law School‘s Dean and President, Penelope Andrews. (Applause) * Associate Dean for Public Interest & Public Service, George Washington School of Law; co-founder of the Public Citizen Litigation Group. ** President, American Civil Liberties Union; Centennial Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School; author, Taking Liberties: The War on Terror and the Erosion of American Democracy. *** Professor of Law Emeritus, University of Virginia School of Law; Past Director, Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression. **** Harold S. Shefelman Scholar, University of Washington School of Law. ***** Founding Co-Director, Pennsylvania Center for the First Amendment; John & Ann Curley Professor of First Amendment Studies, Pennsylvania State University.
    [Show full text]
  • POWER for the PEOPLE Alan Morrison Named fi Rst Public Interest Law Dean • by CARRIE MADREN •
    POWER FOR THE PEOPLE Alan Morrison named fi rst public interest law dean • BY CARRIE MADREN • fter more than 40 years of being a public interest rules that said lawyers had to live in state to be part of a bar, a attorney, Alan B. Morrison has debunked a measure designed to protect local lawyers, Morrison says. common misconception. Morrison counts founding Public Citizen among the most “The message has been ‘You can’t fi ght City meaningful achievements of his career. Hall,’ but that’s wrong—you can,” Morrison “After 37 years, it’s still doing great work,” Morrison says. says. As a public interest lawyer, he continues, you have to plan When he retired from Public Citizen in 2004 to work as a senior which techniques and tools to use. “You have to know more lecturer on administrative and public interest law at Stanford about all areas of law because you don’t have the securities, tax, Law School, he knew he’d set up an institution that would be or fi nance departments that are found in private law fi rms.” able to attract superior people and sustain the mission. That’s a small piece of wisdom the lawyer and teacher “I’ve always been interested in public service,” Morrison brings to GW Law School students next year as the fi rst says. “It’s important work, and it actually makes a difference Lerner Family Associate Dean for Public Interest and Public in people’s lives.” That’s true whether you’re working for the Service Law.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nader Protégé with Friends in High Places Alan Morrison Exits for Stanford After 32 Years Vexing the Powerful
    WEEK OF May 24, 2004 • VOL. XXVII, NO. 21 Moving On: A Nader Protégé With Friends in High Places Alan Morrison exits for Stanford after 32 years vexing the powerful. BY TONY MAURO t was fitting that one of Alan Morrison’s final acts on behalf of the Public Citizen Litigation Group was to irritate the I powerful—something he has done regularly for more than three decades. The 66-year-old Morrison, who is leaving Washington, D.C., this summer to teach at Stanford Law School, filed a motion in February asking Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia to recuse himself in Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Scalia’s widely criticized duck-hunting trip with R OBERTO WESTBROOK OBERTO Vice President Dick Cheney in January while the case was pend- ing had created “an appearance of impropriety,” Morrison wrote. But it was also apt that, in a memorandum rejecting the motion, Scalia dished it right back at Morrison. Scalia released a “Dear Nino” letter Morrison had sent him last October inviting Scalia to come and talk to his students at Stanford later this year. FAMILIAR FACE: Alan Morrison of Public Citizen Litigation Group has Describing Morrison as “a friend,” Scalia wrote, “I saw noth- argued 16 times at the U.S. Supreme Court. ing amiss in that friendly letter and invitation. I surely would have thought otherwise if I had applied the standards urged in Charles Fried to Clinton SG Seth Waxman, Reagan White House the present motion.” Counsel Fred Fielding to Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta.
    [Show full text]
  • SCAP Programdonorless04
    PUBLIC CITIZEN HONORS ALAN MORRISON June 3, 2004 Washington, DC CLICK HERE TO HELP SUPPORT THE ALAN MORRISON SUPREME COURT ASSISTANCE PROJECT. MESSAGE FROM JOAN CLAYBROOK PRESIDENT OF PUBLIC CITIZEN Thirty-two years ago, Ralph Nader and Alan Morrison started a new law firm in Washington. It was a different kind of firm — one that focused not on representing clients in routine civil and criminal matters, but rather on affecting public policy, changing the law when it was unjust or unconstitutional, and pursuing justice for those who lacked political or economic power.Thus, the Public Citizen Litigation Group was born.Though the pay was low and the odds were often great, the Group attracted some of the best and brightest lawyers that our law schools turned out.These legal gladiators challenged power at the highest levels and proceeded to rack up groundbreaking court victories to overturn anti-consumer decisions by government agencies, defend constitutional principles, and gain access for the public to the inner workings of government. Since then, they have argued 47 cases in the U.S. Supreme Court and assisted private lawyers with hundreds of others.They have argued hundreds of cases in the U. S. Courts of Appeal.They have litigated more than 300 Freedom of Information Act cases.They have never stopped pursuing cutting-edge legal battles on behalf of citizens. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said recently that Alan “is the very model of what a great advocate should be. ... He represents the best of the legal profession, the most dedicated, the least selfish.” Public Citizen has been fortunate to have Alan to serve as a guiding light for the lawyers of the Litigation Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Morrison, Esquire
    ALAN MORRISON, ESQUIRE Oral History Project The Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit Oral History Project United States Courts The Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit District of Columbia Circuit ALAN MORRISON, ESQUIRE Interviews conducted by: Daniel Marcus, Esquire December 8, 2007; January 11, January 19, January 26, February 2, February 10, March 2, March 23, March 30, April 6 and June 27, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ...................................................................... i Oral History Agreements Alan Morrison, Esquire................................................... iii Daniel Marcus, Esquire....................................................v Oral History Transcript of Interviews: First Interview, December 8, 2007............................................1 Second Interview, January 11, 2008.........................................3 1 Third Interview, January 19, 2008...........................................6 5 Fourth Interview, January 26, 2008.........................................100 Fifth Interview, February 2, 2008..........................................130 Sixth Interview, February 10, 2008.........................................158 Seventh Interview, March 2, 2008..........................................184 Eighth Interview, March 23, 2008..........................................218 Ninth Interview, March 30, 2008...........................................241 Tenth Interview, April 6, 2008.............................................272 Eleventh Interview,
    [Show full text]
  • Special Anniversary Issue
    PublicPublic CitizenCitizen SPECIAL ANNIVERSARY ISSUE Vol. 26, No. 1, 2006 Public Citizen 1600 20th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009 (202) 588-1000 PublicPublic THE 35TH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE e-mail: [email protected] www.citizen.org ublic Citizen is a national nonprofit CONTENTS Pmembership organization based in CitizenCitizen Washington, D.C. Since its founding by Ralph Nader in 1971, Public Citizen has fought for corporate and government accountability in order to guarantee the individual’s right to safe products, a healthy environment and workplace, fair trade, and clean and safe energy sources. Public Citizen is active in Congress, the courts, government agencies and the news media. Welcome to the Birthday Party By Joan Claybrook, President Public Citizen does not accept government 2 or corporate grants. Our funding comes from our thousands of individual supporters throughout the country who believe there should be full-time advocates of democratic principles working on their The People of Public Citizen behalf; from foundations; and from the sale of our publications. Public Citizen is an Raiders of the Lost Democracy equal opportunity employer. A look at the amazing people who have To become a member of Public Citizen and 3 receive Public Citizen News, please call made Public Citizen a force for good for (202) 588-1000 or send a check payable 35 years to Public Citizen for $20 (or $35 to add one year of Health Letter) to Public Citizen Membership Services at the address Meet the Directors above. Introducing the dedicated individuals who Public Citizen News (ISSN 0738-5927), 7 entire contents copyrighted 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Keynote Address†
    PRINTERNADER.DOC 1/15/2020 2:13 PM Keynote Address† RALPH NADER* Ladies and gentlemen, this is a remarkable conference for a number of reasons. One is that there hasn’t been one like this for many years, and its comprehensiveness reflects both Bob Fellmeth’s and Julie D’Angelo Fellmeth’s prodigious efforts and the efforts of all the other people who have worked so hard over six months to get this underway. But I think that the Fellmeths are about to imprint history. I think not since Sidney and Beatrice Webb has there been such a duo in terms of initiating so many progressive currents and training so many people here at the University of San Diego School of Law. They have a dean, Dan Rodriguez, who is not afraid to challenge corporate pressures to stifle or otherwise daunt what a law school should be about: engines of knowledge and engines of justice. The “Future of Public Interest Law” is an invitation to candor. I remember in the late ‘60s meeting with Charlie Halpern at a restaurant in Washington. Charlie was at Arnold & Porter and he was getting agitated. † This Address has been edited to remove the minor cadences of speech that appear awkward in writing and to identify significant sources when first referred to by the speaker. * LL.B. 1958, Harvard Law School; A.B. magna cum laude 1955, Princeton University. Mr. Nader’s first major investigation and book, Unsafe at Any Speed, and the subsequent attempted retaliation by the auto industry, thrust him into the national spotlight thirty-five years ago.
    [Show full text]