A Primitive Species of Chilotherium (Perissodactyla

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Cainozoic Research, 5(1-2), pp. 93-102, November 2006 A primitive species of Chilotherium (Perissodactyla, Rhinocerotidae) from the Late Miocene of the Linxia Basin (Gansu, China) Tao Deng Institute of VertebratePaleontology and Paleoanthropology, ChineseAcademy of Sciences, P. O. Box 643, Beijing 100044, China: e- mail: [email protected] Received 1 June 2003; revised version accepted March 2006 skull with its articulated attributed the Late Miocene of Linxia Basin A mandible to Chilotheriumprimigenius sp. nov. from the (Gansu, is described. This Late Miocene the earliest and in the with China), early species is most primitive genus Chilotherium.Compared the other Late Miocene of C. →C.wimani→other of Chilotherium is species Chilotherium, a tentative lineageof primigenius→ species pro- A C. posed. Late Miocene Asian radiationis suggested for this genus, starting fromLinxia primigenius. The origin and dispersal history ofthe genus Chilotherium are discussed and correlated with major faunal exchanges. The sequence ofthe Late Miocene Hipparion fauna in the Linxia Basin, which yields the remains described herein, is also discussed. KEY WORDS: Chilotherium, Late Miocene, Linxia Basin, new species. of of Introduction cies Chilotherium, leading to the description a new species. Late Cenozoic terrestrial deposits from the Linxia Basin (Gansu, China) have yielded many mammalian fossils. In these faunas, rhinocerotids are very abundant and species- Systematic palaeontology rich. The rhinocerotids have essentially been collected and studiedsince the 1980s(Qiu etal, 1987,1990;Qiu & Xie, Family RhinocerotidaeOwen, 1845 1998; Guan, 1988; Guan & Zhang, 1993). Recently, we Subfamily AceratheriinaeDollo, 1885 have collected many new rhinocerotid material (Deng, Tribe ChilotheriiniQiu etal., 1987 2002a, 2003; Qiu et al. 2002). Qiu et al. Genus ChilotheriumRingstrom, 1924 2001b, c, b, , (1987)attributed a skull with its articulatedmandiblefrom the Linxia Basin to Acerorhinus hezhengensis and consid- ered that it differed from the species ofthe genus Chiloth- Chilotheriumprimigenius sp. nov. erium. They established a newtribe Chilotheriini, including (Figures 1-2, Tables 1-3) the genera Acerorhinus and Chilotherium.Their material was recovered from unnamed Late Miocene deposits at Holotype — HMV 0102, an adultskull with its articulated Dashengou (Hezheng, Linxia Basin). Deng (2001a) de- mandible. This mandible lacks the posterior part of the scribed much more materialof Chilotheriumwimani from horizontal ramus, the lower part of ascending ramus and than and consid- Fugu (Shaanxi, China) Ringstrom (1924), the left anterior corner of symphysis. ered that C. wimani was the most primitive species of Chi- lotherium. The species of Chilotheriumform a group con- Etymology — The specific name, primigenius, is a Latin sidered be related the Acerorhinus and first. This is considered to closely to genus (Qiu word, means the new species etal., 1987). the most primitive species of Chilotherium. We have collected thousands ofmammalianfossils in the Linxia Basin, including carnivores, rodents, perissodactyls, Type locality — Zhongmajia (35° 24' 47.0"N, 103° 24' proboscideans, artiodactyls, and primates (Deng, 2001b, c, 30.6"E; altitude: 2218 m), 6 km southeast to the Hezheng 2002a, b, 2003; Qiu et ai, 2000, 2001; Wang and Qiu, County seat in Gansu Province, China. The specimen is 2002; An almost skull with its articulated collected from 2003). complete the gray green sandstoneand conglomerate broken mandible from a small and primitive species of in the bottom of the Liushu Formation. The bed bearing Chilotherium has been discovered at Zhongmajia in Hez- this fossil is of the early Late Miocene, corresponding to Its known heng. morphology is different from all the spe- early and middleMN 9. -94- — The braincase is Diagnosis Ventral surface ofmandibularsymphysis flat frontalbones is slightly erect. very narrow, Chiloth- with exterior walls. The is (different from concave surfaces of other known steep parietal crest slightly pro- erium species); parietal crests very slightly separated, form- jecting sideward to form a brim. The two parietal crests to ing a sagittal crest different from the broadly separated meet posteriorly form a sagittal crest with the smallest reach the lat- parietal crests of C. anderssoni, C. habereri, C. samium, C. width of 18 mm, from where they diverge to schlosseri and C. kowalevskii and also different from the eral ends ofthe occipital crest. The posttympanic process is , of with smoothanterior and surface. slightly separated parietal crests lacking a sagittal crest thin, a a rough posterior C. C. wimani C. and C. kiliasi. This sideward, and declines for- xizangensis, , persiae process expands slightly ward to fuse with the postglenoid process on the upper part — exists Description Skull: The skull face is high. The premaxil- of the latter. As a result, a pseudoauditory meatus The is thin larybone is retracted into a vertical flake with a sharp ante- between them. postglenoid process longitudi- incisors absent. Both ends of with transverse section. The interior rior end. The upper are pre- nally, a triangular sur- maxillary bones are in close proximity. In ventral view, the face of the postglenoid process is smooth, and the exterior surface vertical The end of the premaxillary bone is thin and sharp, and its end is at the has a groove posteriorly. forward. The same level with the nasal tip. The nasal notch is narrow and postglenoid process curves temporal condyle deep, and its bottom is located at the level of M1/P4 is flat and straight, and its interior margin spaces out the boundary. A large infraorbital foramen on the maxillary postglenoid process by a deep groove. The articular surface is with continuous face is located near the bottomof the nasal notch. The dis- behindthe temporal condyle narrow, a tance between the bottomof thenasal notch and the orbit is wide crest on its exterior and posterior margins to form a transverse flute to the The very short, 55.5 mm. The wide and prominent anterior parallel temporal condyle. margin ofthe orbit is located at the level of the middle of pterygoid bones are high, with a deep valley between them. M2, and connects downward with the anterior margin of The maxillary tubercle is well developed, with a sharp pos- zygomatic arch. A frontward face is in front of the large terior end. The palatal surface is smooth and narrowly ofthe is and and round orbit. The postorbital process is well developed arched. The posterior margin palate V-shaped, its bottom is located the level of the of M3. on the frontal bone, but absent on the the zygomatic bone. at protocone The supraorbital and lacrimal tubercles are relatively Mandible:There is a long distance between the ascending is notch between the and m3. The of anterior of the marked. There a postorbital process ramus upper part margin rounded. The coronoid and supraorbital tubercle, and there is another one between ascending ramus is thin and process the supraorbital and the lacrimal tubercles. The zygomatic is well developed, and strongly curved backward. The is wide and arch is projecting highly to form a strong facial crest with a condyloid process very transversely narrow right angle, and its anterior end is located at the level of longitudinally, especially narrower interiorly. Near the inte- there is marked P4/M1 boundary. This arch is constricted inward at the rior end of the condyloid process, a con- is striction. On the of the level of the postorbital process, while its posterior part posterior part condyloid process, is and with expanded outward as a semicircle. The widest part of the there a narrow deep transverse groove a sharp zygomatic arch is located at the level of the postorbital bottom and a well-developed transverse crest. the end of the arch, its In view, the mandibular process. On posterior zygomatic top symphysis expands strongly sideward form shovel. The alveolar is crest posterior upper corner is rounded, and its posterior margin to a margin a and its anterior is straight and inclined forward. In ventral view, the zygo- with a straight posterior part, part expands The outward to be close to i2. There is wide matic arch is very thin.The occipital elevationis high. a U-shaped valley occipital surface and lateral margins incline forward obvi- between the two alveolar margins. The posterior margin of mandibular is located the level of ously. The lower part of the occipital surface is broken. the symphysis at p3/p4 In front view, the alveolar between the The foramen magnum is onion-shaped, with a sharp upper boundary. margin shallow central second lower incisors is thinand The ventral end. The occipital crest has a wide and uplifted. sur- and its lateral corners are rounded. The lateral face of the mandibular is broad and flat, on groove, two symphysis nutrient foramina distributed margins ofthe occipital crest are straight and parallel each which there are some large other. The nuchal ligament depression is wide and shallow. densely and irregularly, four on the right side. The exterior lateral crest is strong, and a deep vertical de- Upper teeth: The premolars have been worn deeply to reach the The labialwalls ofthe cheek teeth pression is present between this crest and the lateral margin root. upper are the nuchal flat. DP 1 has root. The molars also have been worn of the occipital crest. The median crest on liga- a single M3 becomes ment depression connects with the upperend of the fora- to be close to the root. As a result, a quadran- On the molars, the is constricted; the en- men magnum. The cranial top is smooth and flat, and it is gle. protocone the widest at the level of the supraorbital tubercle. The trance ofmedian depression is wide, with some pillars; the and and extend and of and nasals are narrow long, flatly straight. lingual margins protocone hypocone are straight. is enamel board the The nasal top is convex, and its basehas a marked constric- There a well-developed on posterior tion.
Recommended publications
  • Kapitel 5.Indd

    Kapitel 5.Indd

    Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg 256 43–56 4 Figs, 2 Tabs Frankfurt a. M., 15. 11. 2006 Neogene Rhinoceroses of the Linxia Basin (Gansu, China) With 4 fi gs, 2 tabs Tao DENG Abstract Ten genera and thirteen species are recognized among the rhinocerotid remains from the Miocene and Pliocene deposits of the Linxia Basin in Gansu, China. Chilotherium anderssoni is reported for the fi rst time in the Linxia Basin, while Aprotodon sp. is found for the fi rst time in Lower Miocene deposits of the basin. The Late Miocene corresponds to a period of highest diversity with eight species, accompanying very abundant macromammals of the Hipparion fauna. Chilotherium wimani is absolutely dominant in number and present in all sites of MN 10–11 age. Compared with other regions in Eurasia and other ages, elasmotheres are more diversifi ed in the Linxia Basin during the Late Miocene. Coelodonta nihowanensis in the Linxia Basin indicates the known earliest appearance of the woolly rhino. The distribution of the Neogene rhinocerotids in the Linxia Basin can be correlated with paleoclimatic changes. Key words: Neogene, rhinoceros, biostratigraphy, systematic paleontology, Linxia Basin, China Introduction mens of mammalian fossils at Hezheng Paleozoological Museum in Gansu and Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology The Linxia Basin is situated in the northeastern corner of and Paleoanthropology in Beijing. the Tibetan Plateau, in the arid southeastern part ofeschweizerbartxxx Gansusng- Several hundred skulls of the Neogene rhinoceroses Province, China. In this basin, the Cenozoic deposits are are known from the Linxia Basin, but most of them belong very thick and well exposed, and produce abundant mam- to the Late Miocene aceratheriine Chilotherium wimani.
  • A New Species of the Rhinoceros Alicornops from the Middle Miocene of the Linxia Basin, Gansu, China

    A New Species of the Rhinoceros Alicornops from the Middle Miocene of the Linxia Basin, Gansu, China

    A NEW SPECIES OF THE RHINOCEROS ALICORNOPS FROM THE MIDDLE MIOCENE OF THE LINXIA BASIN, GANSU, CHINA by TAO DENG . A new species of the genus Alicornops, A. laogouense, from Laogou in Hezheng County, Linxia Basin, China, is described. It is mid-sized in the subfamily Aceratheriinae, but is the largest known species of It represents the first discovery of the genus in Asia. The Middle Miocene fauna bearing A. laogouense is lteI1npOlranleOllS with the Dingjiaergou fauna of Tongxin, Ningxia, China, and its age corresponds to MN 6 in Europe. discovery of A. laogouense in the Linxia Basin implies that Alicornops dispersed from Europe to Asia. During 6 times it was relatively widespread throughout Eurasia. Alicornops laogouense lived in open woodland rich in and rivers. WORDS: Linxia Basin, China, Middle Miocene, Rhinocerotidae, Aceratheriinae. HE Late Cenozoic deposits in the Linxia Basin, Gansu, China, are thick and well exposed. Recently, a m""'''''''<> 11' <In fauna consisting of abundant fossils was discovered in this basin in Middle Miocene deposits Laogou in Hezheng County (Text-fig. 1). The deposits consist of greyish yellow, gravelly, generally .dated sands and occasionally hard sandstones. The sands are mostly medium grained and contain fine gravels. The thickness of the deposits is approximately 58 m. The overlying deposits are grey, rusty yellow sandstones and fine gravels. The underlying beds are alternating thin-bedded light and light orange clays. Judging by the percentage of specimens recovered, proboscideans were dominant and rhinocerotids secondary in this fauna. The known fossils include Amphicyon tairumensis, Anchitheriwn gobiensis, herium sp., Hemicyon teilhardi, Hispanotheriwn matritense, Kubanochoerus gigas, Listriodon liensis, Palaeotragus tungurensis, Platybelodon grangeri, Pliopithecus sp., Zygolophodon sp., and rhrnoc:en)s described herein.
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT

    71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT

    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
  • Sexual Dimorphism in Perissodactyl Rhinocerotid Chilotherium Wimani from the Late Miocene of the Linxia Basin (Gansu, China)

    Sexual Dimorphism in Perissodactyl Rhinocerotid Chilotherium Wimani from the Late Miocene of the Linxia Basin (Gansu, China)

    Sexual dimorphism in perissodactyl rhinocerotid Chilotherium wimani from the late Miocene of the Linxia Basin (Gansu, China) SHAOKUN CHEN, TAO DENG, SUKUAN HOU, QINQIN SHI, and LIBO PANG Chen, S., Deng, T., Hou, S., Shi, Q., and Pang, L. 2010. Sexual dimorphism in perissodactyl rhinocerotid Chilotherium wimani from the late Miocene of the Linxia Basin (Gansu, China). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 55 (4): 587–597. Sexual dimorphism is reviewed and described in adult skulls of Chilotherium wimani from the Linxia Basin. Via the anal− ysis and comparison, several very significant sexually dimorphic features are recognized. Tusks (i2), symphysis and oc− cipital surface are larger in males. Sexual dimorphism in the mandible is significant. The anterior mandibular morphology is more sexually dimorphic than the posterior part. The most clearly dimorphic character is i2 length, and this is consistent with intrasexual competition where males invest large amounts of energy jousting with each other. The molar length, the height and the area of the occipital surface are correlated with body mass, and body mass sexual dimorphism is compared. Society behavior and paleoecology of C. wimani are different from most extinct or extant rhinos. M/F ratio indicates that the mortality of young males is higher than females. According to the suite of dimorphic features of the skull of C. wimani, the tentative sex discriminant functions are set up in order to identify the gender of the skulls. Key words: Mammalia, Perissodactyla, Chilotherium wimani, sexual dimorphism, statistics, late Miocene, China. Shaokun Chen [[email protected]], Chongqing Three Gorges Institute of Paleoanthropology, China Three Gorges Museum, 236 Ren−Min Road, Chongqing 400015, China and Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 142 Xi−Zhi−Men−Wai Street, P.O.
  • FOSSIL RHINOCEROSES of MYANMAR.Pdf (2235

    FOSSIL RHINOCEROSES of MYANMAR.Pdf (2235

    Jour, Mya n. Aca d. Arts & Sc. 2014 Vol. Xli. No.6 FOSSIL RHINOCEROSES OF MYANMAR Zh . r-. t.J ullg Maung Thein', Thaung Htike2, Maung Maung3 Abstract Rhinocer....ses, the family Rhinocerotidae, currently inhabit in Africa and South and Southeas t Asia. In the fossil record. this family was diversified into many gene-a and species, and was widely distributed throughout No rth America, Asia. Europe and Africa in the geological past. In Myanmar. fossil remains of rhinoceroses have b-en doc umented in the late Eocene Pondaung Formation belonging to one species (cf. Teletaceras sp.). However. remains of rhinoceros are comm on in the Neogene of central Myanmar represen ting four genera ("Diceratherium" naricum, Brachypotherinm petimense, Brachypotherium fat ehjangense, Rhinoceros sondaicus, Rhinoceros sp., Dicerorhinus gwebinensis.; Ilicerorhinus sp.) and one indeterm inate genus (tota l eight species). Neogene rhinoceros of Myanmar are also common ly known in the Indian Subcontinent, ind icating the possible faunal exchanges between these regions. Hov eve r. presence of some faunal elements such as elephant (Sinomastodon sp.) and wild boar tPropotamochoerus sp.} in the Pliocene or later period suggests a possible faunal exchange with East Asia. Keywords: Irrawaddy Formation, Neogene, Pondaung Formation, Rhinocerotidae, systematic paleontology Introdu ction The family Rhinocerotidae first arose in the Eocene as one clade of the superfamily Rhinocerotoidea together with Hyracodontidae and Amynodontidae. This family is now in the danger of extinction, and its distribution is limited to Africa and Asian Region (Martin et ai, 2001). However, it was diversified into many genera and species, and was widely distributed throughout North America, Asia, Europe and Africa in the geological past (Prothero et al.
  • En El Mioceno Tardío De Chiapas, México

    En El Mioceno Tardío De Chiapas, México

    Arculo cienfico Lum/enero-junio, vol. 2, no. 1, pag. 18-29 TELEOCERAS Y CF. PERACERAS (PERISSODACTYLA, RHINOCEROTIDAE) EN EL MIOCENO TARDÍO DE CHIAPAS, MÉXICO Gerardo Carbot-Chanona Departamento de Paleontología, Dirección de Gestión, Investigación y Educación Ambiental, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente e Historia Natural. Calzada de Las Personas Ilustres S/N, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, México. [email protected] RESUMEN Se describen restos fósiles de rinoceronte recolectados en la localidad Puente Ixcán, municipio de Ocosingo, Chiapas, México. El mate- rial consiste en un P2 derecho y un radio derecho completo que presenta evidencias de arrastre. Los caracteres morfológicos y merís- cos, así como el rango temporal de la asociación faunísca, permiten asignar los ejemplares a Teleoceras cf. T. hicksi y cf. Peraceras sp. Los restos de rinoceronte se encuentran asociados con tortugas trioníquidas, cf. Crocodylus sp., un Caimaninae indeterminado, Gomp- hotherium sp. cf. G. hondurensis y un caballo indeterminado. La presencia de cf. T. hicksi y cf. G. hondurensis en la asociación faunísca permite proponer que pertenece al NALMA Henfiliano, documentando de esta manera la distribución más sureña de vertebrados terrestres del Mioceno tardío en México. Palabras clave: Rinoceronte, Neógeno, NALMA Henfiliano, asociación de vertebrados. ABSTRACT Rhinoceros fossil remains collected in the Puente Ixcán locality, Ocosingo municipality, Chiapas, Mexico are described. The material consists of a right P2 and a well-preserved right radius, that show dragging marks. The morphological and merisc characters, as well as temporal range of the faunal associaon, allow to assign the specimens as Teleoceras cf. T. hicksi and cf. Peraceras sp. The rhinoceros remains are associated with trionychid tortoises, cf.
  • (Mammalia: Rhinocerotidae) from the Late Miocene Hominoid Fauna

    (Mammalia: Rhinocerotidae) from the Late Miocene Hominoid Fauna

    G Model GEOBIO-654; No. of Pages 10 Geobios xxx (2013) xxx–xxx Available online at ScienceDirect www.sciencedirect.com Original article A juvenile skull of Acerorhinus yuanmouensis (Mammalia: Rhinocerotidae) from the Late Miocene hominoid § fauna of the Yuanmou Basin (Yunnan, China) a,b, Xiaokang Lu * a Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China b University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: A unique juvenile skull bearing both milk premolars and unerupted but fully developed permanent Received 4 February 2013 premolars and molars (observed using X-ray microcomputed tomography), and some isolated upper Accepted 10 October 2013 cheek teeth, all from the Late Miocene hominoid fauna of the Yuanmou Basin (Yunnan, China), closely Available online xxx resemble craniodental material of Acerorhinus yuanmouensis Zong, 1998 from the same locality, and are referred to this species. A phylogenetic analysis based on 214 craniodental morphological characters Keywords: scored for 31 terminal taxa reveals that A. yuanmouensis should be assigned to the genus Acerorhinus Acerorhinus indeed. The newly discovered specimens improve our understanding of this species, especially with Aceratheriinae respect to the morphology of the milk premolars and premolars. Two intraspecific variations in the upper Ontogeny premolars are noted: a lingual bridge may be present or absent, and the lingual cingulum continuous or Cladistic analysis Late Miocene reduced. The analysis also indicates that: the phylogenetic status of Acerorhinus lufengensis Deng and Qi, Yuanmou 2009 should be reconsidered; ‘‘Aceratherium’’ huadeensis Qiu, 1979 does neither belong to Aceratherium Hominoid fauna nor Acerorhinus, and its phylogenetic status remains debatable.
  • Title Faunal Change of Late Miocene Africa and Eurasia: Mammalian

    Title Faunal Change of Late Miocene Africa and Eurasia: Mammalian

    Faunal Change of Late Miocene Africa and Eurasia: Title Mammalian Fauna from the Namurungule Formation, Samburu Hills, Northern Kenya Author(s) NAKAYA, Hideo African study monographs. Supplementary issue (1994), 20: 1- Citation 112 Issue Date 1994-03 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.14989/68370 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University African Study Monographs, Supp!. 20: 1-112, March 1994 FAUNAL CHANGE OF LATE MIOCENE AFRICA AND EURASIA: MAMMALIAN FAUNA FROM THE NAMURUNGULE FORMATION, SAMBURU HILLS, NORTHERN KENYA Hideo NAKAYA Department ofEarth Sciences, Kagawa University ABSTRACT The Namurungule Formation yields a large amount of mammals of a formerly unknown and diversified vertebrate assemblage of the late Miocene. The Namurungule Formation has been dated as approximately 7 to 10 Ma. This age agrees with the mammalian assemblage of the Namurungule Formation. Sedimentological evidence of this formation supports that the Namurungule Formation was deposited in lacustrine and/or fluvial environments. Numerous equid and bovid remains were found from the Namurungule Formation. These taxa indicate the open woodland to savanna environments. Assemblage of the Namurungule Fauna indicates a close similarity to those of North Africa, Southwest and Central Europe, and some similarity to Sub­ Paratethys, Siwaliks and East Asia faunas. The Namurungule Fauna was the richest among late Miocene (Turolian) Sub-Saharan faunas. From an analysis of Neogene East African faunas, it became clear that mammalian faunal assemblage drastically has changed from woodland fauna to openland fauna during Astaracian to Turolian. The Namurungule Fauna is the forerunner of the modem Sub-Saharan (Ethiopian) faunas in savanna and woodland environments. Key Words: Mammal; Neogene; Miocene; Sub-Saharan Africa; Kenya; Paleobiogeography; Paleoecology; Faunal turnover.
  • DSA10 Giourtsakis

    DSA10 Giourtsakis

    Ioannis X. Giaourtsakis Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München Late Neogene Rhinocerotidae of Greece: distribution, diversity and stratigraphical range Giaourtsakis, I.X., 2003 - Late Neogene Rhinocerotidae of Greece: distribution, diversity and stra- tigraphical range - in: Reumer, J.W.F. & Wessels, W. (eds.) - DISTRIBUTION AND MIGRATION OF TERTIARY MAMMALS IN EURASIA. A VOLUME IN HONOUR OF HANS DE BRUIJN - DEINSEA 10: 235- 253 [ISSN 0923-9308] Published 1 December 2003 The present contribution provides a comprehensive overview of the Neogene rhinoceroses of Greece and evaluates their affinities with the European and Asian species. The distribution, diver- sity and dispersal of the family in the Eastern Mediterranean are discussed in detail. Knowledge of rhinos during the Middle Miocene in Greece is still very limited, because of the scarce mate- rial. During the Late Miocene the family was diverse and abundant in Greece. The dominant form, Ceratotherium neumayri, was probably an African immigrant that invaded Southeastern Europe, Anatolia and the Middle East during the Late Miocene. This rather subhypsodont tandem-horned rhino has already achieved most of the apomorphic characters of the living Dicerotina. The con- temporary species Dihoplus pikermiensis is also common, but the origin and evolutionary rela- tionships among its Miocene and Plio-Pleistocene relatives are still controversial. The Greek Late Miocene representatives of the subfamily Aceratheriinae are obviously closer related to the Asian genera Chilotherium and Acerorhinus, than to the typical aceratheres Aceratherium, Alicornops and Hoploaceratherium found in Central and Western Europe at the same time. Chilotherium and Acerorhinus migrated into Greece from Central Asia trough Anatolia at the beginning of the Vallesian.
  • Linxia Basin: an Ancient Paradise for Late Cenozoic Rhinoceroses in North China

    Linxia Basin: an Ancient Paradise for Late Cenozoic Rhinoceroses in North China

    Vol.24 No.2 2010 Paleomammalogy Linxia Basin: An Ancient Paradise for Late Cenozoic Rhinoceroses in North China DENG Tao * Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, CAS, Beijing 100044 he Linxia Basin is located and sometimes partially articulated several hundred skulls of the late on the triple-junction of the bones of large mammals, which often Cenozoic rhinoceroses are known from Tnortheastern Tibetan Plateau, occur in dense concentrations. Many the Linxia Basin. In addition, more western Qinling Mountains and the new species of the Late Oligocene abundant limb bones and isolated teeth Loess Plateau. The basin is filled with Dzungariotherium fauna, the Middle of rhinoceroses are found in this basin, 700−2000 m of late Cenozoic deposits, Miocene Platybelodon fauna, the Late especially from the Late Miocene mainly red in color and dominated by Miocene Hipparion fauna, and the Early red clay deposits. Rhinoceroses were lacustrine siltstones and mudstones, and Pleistocene Equus fauna have been over 70% in diversity during the Late the Linxia sequence represents the most described from the Linxia Basin since Oligocene, and they were dominant in complete and successive late Cenozoic 2000, including rodents, lagomorphs, population during the Late Miocene. section in China. The localities in the primates, carnivores, proboscideans, In the Middle Miocene and Early Linxia Basin are notable for abundant, perissodactyls and artiodactyls. Pleistocene faunas, rhinoceroses were relatively complete, well-preserved, Among these mammalian fossils, important members. Late Oligocene The Late Oligocene fauna of findings in Europe (Qiu and Wang, is estimated at 24 tons, and another the Linxia Basin comes from the 2007).
  • MERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 78 the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY May 25, 1923 New York City

    MERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 78 the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY May 25, 1923 New York City

    -MERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 78 THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY May 25, 1923 New York City 56.9,72B(51.7) BALUCHITHERIUM GRANGERI, A GIANT HORNLESS RHINOCEROS FROM MONGOLIA BY HENRY FAIRFIELD OSBORN' In previous communications on the rhinoceroses (Rhinoceros Con- tributions 1 to 11), Osborn separated six distinct phyla or subfamilies. The remarkable discoveries by Clive Forster Cooper in Baluchistan, by A. Borissiak in north Turkestan, and by Walter Granger of the Third Asiatic Expedition in southeastern and central Mongolia, indicate the existence of a seventh subfamily which we may term Baluchitheriinw, if the generic name proves valid. At present our knowledge rests on the following materials: BUGTI HILLS, Chur-lando, Baluchistan. Cooper Collection, British Museum. Paraceratherium bugtiense Cooper, December 1911. Fairly complete skulls and lower jaws of about the size of a large rhinoceros, simple aceratherine molars, abnormal lower incisors. Y'haumastotherium osborni Cooper, October 1913, changed to Baluchitherium osborni Cooper, November 1913. Fragmentary skeletal remains found in close proximity to Paraceratherium, including neck vertebrae, foot and limb bones of elephantine size. TURGAI, a province of north Turkestan. Discoveries by A. Borissiak, published 1915-1918. Indricotherium asiaticum Borissiak, 1916. Teeth, skull, and skeletal remains, occurring in situ and resembling both Paraceratherium and Baluchitherium. Epiaceratherium turgaicum Borissiak, 1918.2 LOH, central Mongolia, Third Asiatic Expedition Collection, 1922. Associated skull and skeletal remains similar in size to the type of Baluchitherium osborni. Baluchitherium grangeri, new species. Type, nearly complete skull and jaws (Amer. Mus. 18650) associated with parts of vertebrae and of limb bones, as described in the present bulletin.
  • Advanced Online Publication

    Advanced Online Publication

    ChinaXiv合作期刊 古 脊 椎 动 物 学 报 VERTEBRATA PALASIATICA DOI: 10.19615/j.cnki.1000-3118.180109 A new species of Chilotherium (Perissodactyla, Rhinocerotidae) from the Late Miocene of Qingyang, Gansu, China SUN Dan-Hui1,2 LI Yu1,2 DENG Tao1,2,3,4* (1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100044 * Corresponding author: [email protected]) (2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049) (3 TCAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment Beijing 100044) Advanced(4 Department of Earth Sciences, Nanjingonline University Nanjing 210023) publication Abstract An adult skull with articulated atlas and an adult mandible, collected by Emile Licent in 1920 from the Late Miocene of Qingyang (Gansu, China), is recognized as a new species Chilotherium licenti sp. nov. These specimens possess typical characters of the genus Chilotherium, such as the strongly expanded mandibular symphysis, the huge and dagger-shaped i2s with an upturned medial flange, strongly constricted protocones, well-developed crochet and crista, and weakly developed parastyle folds and paracone ribs. Chilotherium licenti is characterized by the near absence of lingual and buccal cingula, and the medifossette on P2 to M2 forming by well-developed crochet and crista. The derived characters of the new species indicate that it is the highly specialized taxon of the genus Chilotherium, corresponding to MN12–13 of the Turolian in Europe. Based on a phylogenetic analysis of rhinocerotids, C. licenti from the Late Miocene is the most derived species in the known species of the Chilotherium lineage.