Bright Penny
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Naval Postgraduate School Graduation Exercises / August 1966
Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Institutional Publications Commencement Ceremony programs 1966-08 Naval Postgraduate School Graduation Exercises / August 1966 Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.) Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/41168 ffealualion 8%1Jc1s1s o/IJ1 W11il1/ 8/al1s ;llaua/Posl9t1aluale 8cJoo/ 011 Wfeln1slay, vf11911sl /Ji1/ vlkn1/1111 J1111'41Isi.¥ly-s1% vf/o11l1t11y, Cali/ot1111a /JJP9Aam y INVOCATION Captain SAMUEL D. CHAMBERS, CHC, USNR INTRODUCTION OF SPEAKER Rear Admiral EDWARD J. O'DONNELL, USN Superintendent, United States Naval Postgraduate School ADDRESS TO GRADUATES Mr. CHARLES A. CHA YNE Former Vice-President, Engineering Staff, General Motors Corporation PRESENTATION OF DISTINGUISHED PROFESSOR MEDALLION to Professor AUSTIN R. FREY AWARDING OF DIPLOMAS Rear Admiral EDWARD J. O'DONNELL, USN CONFERRING OF DEGREES PRESENTATION OF CANDIDATES Professor JAMES M. FREMGEN Chairman, Department of Business Administration and Economics Professor EUGENE C. CRITTENDEN, Jr. Chairman, Department of Physics Professor JACK R. BORSTIN'G Chairman, Department of Operations Analysis Professor RICHARD W. BELL Chairman, Department of Aeronautics Professor GILBERT F. KINNEY Chairman, Department of Material Science and Chemistry REQUIREMENTS Dean ROBERT F. RINEHART Academic Dean, United States Naval Postgraduate School CONFERRING OF DEGREES Rear Admiral EDWARD J. O'DONNELL, USN BENEDICTION Commander FRANCIS J. FITZPATRICK, CHC, USN c JAe ffialuales Those officers whose names are preceded by a star (*) are graduated In Absentia ~ Diplomas of Completion Management Lieutenant Commander Louis F. BESIO, USN Staff, Commander Destroyer Squadron TWENTY-FOUR *Lieutenant Commander Joseph M. CULBERT, Jr., USN Navy School, Transportation Management, Oakland, California Lieutenant Commander Julia J. DiLORENZO, USN Staff, Chief Naval Air Advanced Training, Corpus Christi, Texas Lieutenant Commander Donald E. -
Bright Penny
T H E BRIGHT PENNY September 2002 A NEWSLETTER FOR MEMBERS OF THE USS BERKELEY (DDG -15) ASSOCIATION REUNION 2002 - BE THERE! The Berkeley Association’s reunion, October 17 -20, 2002, promises to be one SKIPPER IN THE SPOTLIGHT of the best we have had. To date a total of 78 former crew members have plans to Born in 1929, Rear Admiral attend. Scheduled events include the Smedberg graduated from the Naval Academy with the Class of 1951. Welcome Reception on During the following 31 years o n Friday and the Banquet active duty he followed the typical on Saturday . The pattern of a Surface Warfare Officer. Hospitality Suite will He had five at -sea commands: an LST be open on Thursday as a Lieutenant, a Frigate as a from 1600 to 2000, Lieutenant Commander, the guided missile destroyer USS BERKELEY from Friday from 1600 to January 1966 to July 1967 as a 2000 and Saturday Commander, a Destroyer Squadron as from 1400 to 1600. a Captain, and the Forrestal Carrier Battle Group as a Rear Admiral. Ray Bartlett There will be a memorabilia table set Between sea duty tours, he served five separate tours on the Chief of up in the hospitality room with the Naval Operations’ staff in the Pentagon. Association’s collection of cruise books. A As a Captain, he also served as videotape of the decommissioning Operations Officer on the SIXTH FLEET ceremony will also be available for in the Mediterranean and as the viewing. In addition, items from the ship’s Assistant Executive and Senior Aide to store will be available for purchase. -
The Good Frigate Reeves
U S S R EEVES (DLG - 2 4 / C G - 2 4 ) A SSOCIATION May 2009 Volume 2, Issue 3 The Ironman—A Double Ender’s Newsletter Membership Scorebox The Good Frigate Reeves Current 57 Many of us, especially in the early was the USS Chesapeake from the War of years of Reeves life, have heard her de- 1812, shown here before capture by HMS Past Due 30 scribed as a frigate. Indeed, that was a Leopold. The most famous frigate from characterization of her relative size and this era was the USS Constitution. Snail Mail Ad- 227 significance to the fleet. She was a really dresses I had the privilege in 1974 of escort- either big destroyer or a small cruiser. Of ing my father and mother onboard Reeves Email Address 258 course, it all depended upon where you when she was starboard side to Bravo Only stood on the pier when you looked up at Piers. My father‘s first observation from her. the pier, looking bow on, was ―she‘s a Now in the olden days, frigates con- pocket cruiser.‖ Of course, he was a jured up the image of medium-sized sail- WWII veteran and cruisers were a skochie Dues Notice! ing ships. They were somewhere between bit smaller than our ―modern‖ destroy- Please be sure to check ers—although Reeves was a whole lot your mailing label. bigger than my first Fletcher. If it doesn’t say Current It turns out that a modern ―pocket‖ (plus year) above your cruiser is really a light cruiser, of the name at the top of the Brooklyn Class. -
Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents
Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents Background This ships list is intended to provide VA regional offices with a resource for determining whether a particular US Navy or Coast Guard Veteran of the Vietnam era is eligible for the presumption of Agent Orange herbicide exposure based on operations of the Veteran’s ship. According to 38 CFR § 3.307(a)(6)(iii), eligibility for the presumption of Agent Orange exposure requires that a Veteran’s military service involved “duty or visitation in the Republic of Vietnam” between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975. This includes service within the country of Vietnam itself or aboard a ship that operated on the inland waterways of Vietnam. However, this does not include service aboard a large ocean- going ship that operated only on the offshore waters of Vietnam, unless evidence shows that a Veteran went ashore. Inland waterways include rivers, canals, estuaries, and deltas. They do not include open deep-water bays and harbors such as those at Da Nang Harbor, Qui Nhon Bay Harbor, Nha Trang Harbor, Cam Ranh Bay Harbor, Vung Tau Harbor, or Ganh Rai Bay. These are considered to be part of the offshore waters of Vietnam because of their deep-water anchorage capabilities and open access to the South China Sea. In order to promote consistent application of the term “inland waterways”, VA has determined that Ganh Rai Bay and Qui Nhon Bay Harbor are no longer considered to be inland waterways, but rather are considered open water bays. -
Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress
Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Updated October 29, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS22478 Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Summary Names for Navy ships traditionally have been chosen and announced by the Secretary of the Navy, under the direction of the President and in accordance with rules prescribed by Congress. Rules for giving certain types of names to certain types of Navy ships have evolved over time. There have been exceptions to the Navy’s ship-naming rules, particularly for the purpose of naming a ship for a person when the rule for that type of ship would have called for it to be named for something else. Some observers have perceived a breakdown in, or corruption of, the rules for naming Navy ships. Section 1749 of the FY2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (S. 1790/P.L. 116-92 of December 20, 2019) prohibits the Secretary of Defense, in naming a new ship (or other asset) or renaming an existing ship (or other asset), from giving the asset a name that refers to, or includes a term referring to, the Confederate States of America, including any name referring to a person who served or held leadership within the Confederacy, or a Confederate battlefield victory. The provision also states that “nothing in this section may be construed as requiring a Secretary concerned to initiate a review of previously named assets.” Section 1749 of the House-reported FY2021 NDAA (H.R. 6395) would prohibit the public display of the Confederate battle flag on Department of Defense (DOD) property, including naval vessels. -
Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
-- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type -
Japan Under the US Nuclear Umbrella
Japan Under the US Nuclear Umbrella Hans Kristensen ___________________________________________________________ Introduction And Summary During the Cold War, rumors concerning U.S. deployments of nuclear weapons to Japan were both numerous and widely reported. Such rumors were consistently met with adamant denials by Japanese governments1 and a refusal by U.S. governments to discuss any aspects of nuclear weapons deployments overseas. Despite the end of the Cold War and the U.S. withdrawal of its last forward-deployed tactical nuclear weapons seven years ago, information about U.S. nuclear operations in Japan has remained shrouded in military secrecy. The Nautilus Institute's East Asia Nuclear Policy Project, a far-ranging project aimed at promoting open debate over the role of nuclear weapons in the Asia-Pacific region, has for the past year sponsored detailed research into the history of U.S. nuclear weapons practices in Japan. U.S. government documents recently declassified under the Freedom of Information Act and obtained through this research add substantial weight to previous assertions that the United States routinely brought nuclear weapons into Japan during the Cold War despite Japan's non-nuclear policy. These documents also shed light on suspicions that Japanese government officials knowingly accepted these deployments. Perhaps most surprisingly, the declassified documents also reveal the previously unreported extent to which the United States also conducted nuclear war planning in Japan. Nautilus Institute Research Associate Hans Kristensen has compiled these findings into a comprehensive, chronologically organized report that combines an array of previously unknown facts with news reports to portray clearly the extent to which the United States and Japan both allowed Japan to become involved in U.S. -
OPNAV REPORT 5750-1 Cclfmanding OFFICER
C<IfMAND HISTORY USS STERETT (CG 31) 1 JANUARY - 31 DECEMBER 1979 OPNAV REPORT 5750-1 CClfMANDING OFFICER USS STERE'IT (CG 31) CAPTAIN JOSEPH STOVER DONNELL, III, USN (ASSUMED COMMAND 3 FEBRUARY 1978) -:.::--..... "'--"-;'--~ ,.,.....;;. -. -:~. PART I CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY 1 JAN CONTIRUDtG ON SUnON IN THE GULF OF OMAN 7 JAN MOTOR WALE BOAT REGATTA (WARDROOMS) .....,. ' 13 JAN DEPART MODLOC ENROUTE SUBIC BAY ',' .. 14 JAN RELIEVED BY rc 75.3 20 JAN ENTER MAIACCA STRAITS 23 JAN QUICKDRAW SURFACE GUNNERY EXERCISE 25 JAN ARRIVE SUBIC BAY, RP 26 JAN VADM FOLEY, COMSEVENTHFLT~VISITS SHIP 2-5 FEB R.OO WORK DEFINITION CONFERENCE 5 FEB VADM FOLEY VISIT AND LUNCH 15 FEB UNDERWAY FOR HARPOONEX OFF KOREA ' ... ""' ...'.1 , ." 16 FEB . QUICKDRAW GUNNERY EXERCISE 17 FEB REPUBLIC OF KOREA PERSONNEL ARRIVE FOR HARPOONEX 18 FEB VADM FOLEY --»mIVES FOR HARPooNEX HARPOON LAUNCH (UNSUCCESSFUL) TERRIER LAUNCH (SUCCESSFUL) SURFACE GUNNERY EXERCISE 22 FEB MOORED BUOY RN-4 HONG KONG 4 MAR ARRIVE PATTAYA, THAILAND 9 MAR RADM ROWDEN AND STAFF DEBARK RENDEZVOUS WITH TG 77.7 FOR TRANSIT TO GULF OF <EAN 11 MAR TRANSIT STRAITS OF MALACCA "8 APR FANTAIL COOKOUT AND USS STERETT (CG 31) BIRTHDAY PARTY 9 APR RADM TISSOT (CTG. 77.7) VISITS SHIP 11 APR ANCHOR DIEGO GARCIA SHIPS BEACH PARTY - "-"," 16 APR SHELLBACK DAY . -" .... KING NEPTUNE VISITS SHIP 19-20 APR SEVENTHFLT BAND VISITS SHIP 24 APR ARRIVE SUBIC BAY 27 APR UNDERWAY FOR SAN DIEGO VIA PEARL HARBOR 4 MAY CHOP TO THIRD FLEET 6 MAY CROSS INTElUJ.ATIONAL DATE LINE 8 MAY ADM DAVIS (CINCPACFLT) VISITS SHIP 9 MAY ARRIVE PEARL HARBOR 10 MAY TIGERS ARRIVE FOR CRUISE TO SAN DIEGO 17 MAY RADM ROWDEN EMBARKS MOORED PIER 4 NAVSTA SAN DIEGO 18 JAN UNDERWAY FOR DEPENDENTSrCRUISE 20 JAN CONDUCT BURIAL AT SEA 24 JUL ARRIVE LONG BEACH NAVAL SHIPYARD BEGIN REGULAR OVERHAUL 22 AUG RADM CARTER VISITS SHIP 7 NOV USS STERETT (CG 31) HOST SHIP FOR I.N.S. -
Peace-Time Attrition Expectations for Naval Fleets an Analysis of Post-WWII Maritime Incidents
CAN UNCLASSIFIED Peace-time attrition expectations for naval fleets An analysis of post-WWII maritime incidents David W. Mason DRDC – Centre for Operational Research and Analysis Defence Research and Development Canada Reference Document DRDC-RDDC-2017-D086 May 2018 CAN UNCLASSIFIED CAN UNCLASSIFIED IMPORTANT INFORMATIVE STATEMENTS Disclaimer: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Department of National Defence) makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, of any kind whatsoever, and assumes no liability for the accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or usefulness of any information, product, process or material included in this document. Nothing in this document should be interpreted as an endorsement for the specific use of any tool, technique or process examined in it. Any reliance on, or use of, any information, product, process or material included in this document is at the sole risk of the person so using it or relying on it. Canada does not assume any liability in respect of any damages or losses arising out of or in connection with the use of, or reliance on, any information, product, process or material included in this document. This document was reviewed for Controlled Goods by Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) using the Schedule to the Defence Production Act. Endorsement statement: This publication has been published by the Editorial Office of Defence Research and Development Canada, an agency of the Department of National Defence of Canada. Inquiries can be sent to: [email protected]. This document refers to an attachment. To request access to this attachment, please email [email protected], citing the DRDC document number. -
October 1967
~~ - OCTOBER 1967 OCTOBER 1967 Nav-Pers-0 NUMBER 609 VICE ADMIRAL BENEDICT J. SEMMES, Jr., USN TheChief of NavalPersonnel TheBureau ofNov- REAR ADMIRAL BERNARD M. STREAN, USN All 'AN'S oI PersonnelCareer TheDeputy Chief ofNaval Personnel Publication, is publishedmonthly by the CAPTAIN JAMES G. ANDREWS, USN Bureau of Naval Personnel for the infor- AssistantChief for Morale Services motion and interest of thenovo1 service as o whole.Issuance of this publication approved in accordance with Deportment o f theof Navy Publications and Printing Regulations, NAVEXOS P-35. Opinions ex- TABLE OF CONTENTS pressedare not necessarily those of the Navy Department.Reference regula-to Features tions, orders and directives isfor infor- OurNumber One Mover: The MSTS Story ...................... 2 mationonly anddoes notby publication Here's MTMTS-ManagingTraffic from Coastto Coast ............ 4 hereinconstitute authority foraction. All originol material may be reprinted as de- A Historic Ceremony:Shipping Over .......................... 8 sired if proper credit is given ALL HANDS. BattleWagon: A new Chapter ................................ 10 Original articles and information of gen- eral interest maybe forwarded addressed UDT Meets UOU ........................................... 13 to theto Editor,ALL HANDS, PersG15, SmallShips, Big Men ...Reservists on Minesweepers ............. 14 BuPers, Navy Deportment, Washington, You Don't SeeMany Like the AHLC Twins ...................... 16 D.C. 20370 (see page 04). DISTRIBU- TION: By Section 8.3203 of the Bureau of 'Intercept HotCargo Below ChuLai' .......................... 18 Naval Personnel tmnual, theBureau di- Ridinga Dragon is Never Dull ................................ 20 rects that oppropriatesteps be taken to insure distributionon the basis of one GaetaWelcomes Sixth Fleet ................................. 22 copy for each 10 officersand enlisted All-NavyCartoon Kings ..................................... 24 personnel. The Bureou invites requests for oddi- Topsin Navy Sports-All-Navy and Regional Champs ........... -
Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents
Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents Background This ships list is intended to provide VA regional offices with a resource for determining whether a particular US Navy or Coast Guard Veteran of the Vietnam era is eligible for the presumption of Agent Orange herbicide exposure based on operations of the Veteran’s ship According to 38 CFR § 3.307(a)(6)(iii), eligibility for the presumption of Agent Orange exposure requires that a Veteran’s military service involved “duty or visitation in the Republic of Vietnam” between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975. This includes service within the country of Vietnam itself or aboard a ship that operated on the inland waterways of Vietnam. However, this does not include service aboard a large ocean- going ship that operated only on the offshore waters of Vietnam, unless evidence shows that a Veteran went ashore. Inland waterways include the rivers, canals, estuaries, delta areas, and enclosed bays of Vietnam. They do not include open deep-water harbors such as those at Da Nang, Nha Trang, Cam Ranh, or Vung Tau. These are considered to be part of the offshore waters of Vietnam because of their deep-water anchorage capabilities and open access to the South China Sea. Ship Categories The list contains five categories of ships that operated on the waters of Vietnam. A Ship is placed on this list when documentary evidence shows that it fits into a particular category. The required evidence can come from an official ship history, deck logs, cruise books, Captain’s letters, or similar documents. -
Vietnam Navy and Coast Guard Ships Recently Identified As Having Been Exposed to Agent Orange
Vietnam Navy and Coast Guard Ships recently identified as having been exposed to Agent Orange Received: Wed, March 9, 2011 8:53:49 AM Posted: March 10, 2011 From: Frank Van Hoy National Service Director Military Order of the Purple Heart Voice: 703-354-2140 Fax: 703-642-2054 Email: [email protected] Attention all Veterans Information on Vietnam Naval Operations Compensation and Pension (C&P) Service has initiated a program to collect data on Vietnam naval operations for the purpose of providing regional offices with information to assist with development in Haas related disability claims based on herbicide exposure from Navy Veterans. To date, there has verification from various sources showing that a number of offshore "blue water" naval vessels conducted operations on the inland "brown water" rivers and delta areas of Vietnam. Also, there has been identification of certain vessel types that operated primarily or exclusively on the inland waterways. The ships and dates of inland waterway service are listed below. If a Veteran's service aboard one of these ships can be confirmed through military records during the time frames specified, then exposure to herbicide agents can be presumed without further development. All vessels of Inshore Fire Support [IFS] Division 93 during their entire Vietnam tour: � USS Carronade (IFS 1) � USS Clarion River (LSMR 409) [Landing Ship, Medium, Rocket] � USS Francis River (LSMR 525) � USS White River (LSMR 536) � All vessels with the designation LST [Landing Ship, Tank] during their entire tour [WWII