DOCSLIB.ORG

Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2015 Annual Report Pursuant to New York Public Authorities Law Section 2800

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2015 Annual Report Pursuant to New York Public Authorities Law Section 2800 Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2015 Annual Report Pursuant to New York Public Authorities Law Section 2800 MTA 2015 ANNUAL REPORT NARRATIVE Pursuant to New York Public Authorities Law Sections 2800 (1)(a)(1), (6), (11), (13), and (17) Section 1—Operations and Performance Performance 1 NYC Transit (Subways and Buses) Long Island Rail Road Metro-North Railroad MTA Bus Company Bridges and Tunnels Section 2—Accomplishments and Initiatives Customer Service Initiatives 13 Interagency NYC Transit (Subways) MTA Bus Operations (NYCT Department of Buses, MTA Bus Company) Long Island Rail Road Metro-North Railroad Bridges and Tunnels Operations/Technology Initiatives 22 Interagency NYC Transit (Subways) MTA Bus Operations (NYCT Department of Buses, MTA Bus Company) Long Island Rail Road Metro-North Railroad Bridges and Tunnels Sustainability/Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Initiatives 30 Interagency NYC Transit (Subways) MTA Bus Operations (NYCT Department of Buses, MTA Bus Company) Long Island Rail Road Metro-North Railroad Bridges and Tunnels Safety/Security Initiatives 37 Interagency: MTA Police Department NYC Transit (Subways) MTA Bus Operations (NYCT Department of Buses, MTA Bus Company) Long Island Rail Road Metro-North Railroad Bridges and Tunnels Cost Cutting/Revenue Initiatives 47 Interagency NYC Transit (Subways) MTA Bus Operations (NYCT Department of Buses, MTA Bus Company) Long Island Rail Road Metro-North Railroad Bridges and Tunnels Section 3—Capital Projects Commitments/Completions The MTA Capital Programs 52 Capital Program Progress 54 Funding Received Through December 31, 2015 Capital Program Progress, 1982-2015 Capital Program Progress, 2015 New York City Transit (Subways) 56 Major 2015 Commitments Major 2015 Completions MTA Bus Operations (NYCT Dept. of Buses, MTA Bus Company) 60 Major 2015 Commitments Major 2015 Completions Long Island Rail Road 62 Major 2015 Commitments Major 2015 Completions Metro-North Railroad 68 Major 2015 Commitments Major 2015 Completions MTA Bridges and Tunnels 72 Major 2015 Commitments Major 2015 Completions MTA Capital Construction 74 Fulton Center Second Avenue Subway 7 Line Extension East Side Access Section 4—Description of the MTA and the MTA Board Structure Description of the MTA and the MTA Board Structure 77 Numbers of Employees Basic Organizational Structure of MTA Operations Governance of the MTA Board Members and Committee Assignments Board Members’ Attendance Section 5—Material Pending Litigation Report Material Pending Litigation Report 84 General Note The MTA Transit System Commuter System MTA Bridges and Tunnels MTA Bus MTA Long Island Bus Accompanying 2015 Documents The Following Reports Are Attached Financial Reports All Agency and Board Codes of Ethics Asset and Service Report 2015 Compensation Schedule and Biographical Information Reports Bond Rating Reports Consolidated Financial Statements Governance Principles and By-Laws Grant Report 2015 MTA Legislation Mission Statement and Measurement Report Management Assessment of the Effectiveness of Internal Controls Real and Personal Property Reports with Guidelines Board Self-Assessment Report 2015 ANNUAL REPORT—SECTION 1 Operations and Performance Performance This section of the Annual Report summarizes ridership and other performance data for the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2015. (See also, the “Mission Statement, Measurement, and Performance Indicator Report,” Public Authorities Law Sections 1269-f and 2824-a.)* While ridership on the subways and railroads of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) rose to record levels in 2015, bus ridership declined by around 2.1 percent. As a result, overall ridership on MTA subways, buses, and railroads remained just over 2.72 billion trips, roughly the same as the previous year. At 1.76 billion rides, New York City Transit (NYCT) Subway saw its highest ridership levels since 1948, with some lines running near peak levels through much of the day. Traffic on MTA Bridges and Tunnels rose 4.0 percent in 2015 to a record 297.9 million crossings. In addition to regular operations and the 2015 agency initiatives, covered in Section 2 of this report, the MTA achieved several historic milestones in 2015. Ten months after the opening of the Fulton Center in November 2014, the mile-long 7 Line Extension saw its ribbon-cutting ceremony in September 2015, bringing subway service for the first time to Manhattan’s Far West Side. The new 34th Street-Hudson Yards Station is the 469th station in New York’s subway system, and the first new station since 1989. Both MTA commuter railroads, the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) and Metro-North Railroad (Metro-North), saw record ridership in 2015, totaling over 174 million MTA rail customers, while at the same time achieving the best records of mechanical performance in their respective histories. Both railroads moved forward with the implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC) systems, a major step towards state-of-the-art rail control. All of the MTA transportation agencies continued major “Recovery and Resiliency” projects in 2015 to repair damage from Superstorm Sandy and to fortify the MTA infrastructure * Because of the timing of the “Mission Statement,” the performance data in that report are subject to subsequent reconciliation and adjustment as data is finalized by each agency over the course of the year. For that reason, some of the data reported in the “Mission Statement” have been adjusted in this report to reflect the most recent 2015 performance data, as of March 15, 2016. 1 against future severe-weather events. Those projects are identified in Section 3 of this report, along with other major 2015 Capital Program commitments and completions. On October 28, 2015, the MTA Board approved a revised 2015-2019 Capital Program. The proposed program totals $29.0 billion, which is nearly 10 percent less than the initial plan approved by the Board in 2014. The largest capital investment in the history of the MTA system, the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program includes $21.6 billion in core investments for MTA subways, buses, and railroads; $4.5 billion for the Second Avenue Subway, East Side Access, and Penn Station Access; and $2.9 billion for MTA Bridges and Tunnels. The MTA Capital Program is discussed further in Section 3 of this report, and the complete proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program, with detailed project spending and revenue sources, is available on the MTA website at mta.info/capital. Reported in Section 1 below are the 2015 performance measurement results for each of the principal MTA agencies providing subway, bus, commuter rail, and bridge-and-tunnel crossing services. Please note that as part of its public transparency initiatives, the MTA regularly updates Performance Dashboards posted on its website at www.mta.info, under the heading “About the MTA,” allowing the public to track MTA performance by agency on a monthly basis. The Dashboards display key indicators for MTA New York City Transit (NYCT) subways, buses, and paratransit services; MTA Long Island Rail Road (LIRR); MTA Metro-North Railroad (Metro-North); MTA Bus Company (MTA Bus); and MTA Bridges and Tunnels. Performance in all categories is measured monthly and compared to published goals. Because MTA performance indicators are regularly updated, some of the data reported here may be subject to later adjustment and reconciliation. 2 New York City Transit—2015 Performance Ridership on NYCT Subways surpassed last year’s record by more than 11 million riders, reaching over 1.76 billion rides in 2015, with several lines running near “rush hour” levels throughout much of the day. Ridership exceeded 6 million on 49 weekdays in 2015, up from 29 weekdays in 2014. This represents the highest annual subway ridership in New York City since the 1940s. NYCT Subways continued to repair damage from Superstorm Sandy and harden the system against extreme weather. Significant progress was made towards the reconstruction of the South Ferry Terminal (1 Line), while rehabilitation of the Cranberry Tube (A,C Lines) and the 53rd Street Tube (E,M Lines) kicked off with weekend work. Also in 2015, NYCT Subways continued implementation of its highly effective FASTRACK program, which schedules nighttime shutdowns on subway line segments for faster, safer, and more comprehensive repairs and maintenance. NYCT Bus ridership decreased by about 2.5 percent from the previous year, due in part to the March 2015 fare increase. Despite a significant number of over-age buses, the mean distance between failures (MDBF) increased by 9.4 percent, while the percentage of trips completed remained constant at 99.0 percent. Both “MTA Bus Trek,” used by dispatchers, and “MTA Bus Time” for customers are fully operational on all bus routes, providing “real-time” bus information, with free, downloadable Android and iOS apps for MTA Bus Time. New Select Bus Service (SBS) routes were launched in 2015 to provide faster service and transit links on the busy Manhattan M86 and Queens/Bronx Q44 corridors. 3 Performance Key New York City Transit At or above target Below target by less than 5% Below target by 5% or more Change 2015 Target 2015 Actual from Target Service Indicators On-Time Performance - Subways 75.0% 69.6% -5.4% Wait Assessment - Subways 80.7% 77.4% -3.3% Elevator Availability - Subways 96.5% 96.5% 0.0% Escalator Availability - Subways 95.2% 94.3% -0.9% Total Ridership – Subways 1,777,356,000 1,762,565,419 -0.8% Mean Distance Between
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Design a Subway Station Mosaic That Reflects Their Home Or School Neighborhood and Draw It
    MILES OF TILES MILES OF TILES BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR TEACHERS “Design and aesthetics have been a part of the subway from the original stations of 1904 to the latest work in 2018. But nothing in New York stands still – certainly not the subway - and the approach to subway style has evolved, reflecting the major stages of the system’s construction during the early 1900s, the teens, and the late 20s and early 30s and the renovations and redesigns of later years. The earliest parts of the system still convey the flowery, genteel flavor of a smaller, older city. Later sections, by contrast, show a conscious turn toward the modern, including open admiration for the system’s raw structural power. The evolution of subway design follows the trajectory of the world of art and architecture as these came to terms with the Industrial revolution, and the tug-of-war between a traditional deference to European models and a modernist ideology demanding an honest expression of contemporary industrial technology.” —Subway style: 100 years of Architecture & Design in the New York City Subway New York City, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, was an industrial hub attracting many Americans from rural communities looking for work, and immigrants looking for better lives. It was, however, blighted by impoverished neighborhoods of broken down tenements and social injustice. The city lacked a plan for how it should look, where structures should be built, or how services should be distributed. It was described as a ‘ragged pincushion of towers’ with no government regulation over the urban landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of Metro-North and Long Island Committees
    Meeting of Metro-North and Long Island Committees September 2015 Members J. Sedore, Chair, MNR Committee M. Pally, Chair, LIRR Committee F. Ferrer, MTA Vice Chairman J. Ballan R. Bickford N. Brown I. Greenberg J. Kay S. Metzger J. Molloy C. Moerdler V. Tessitore, Jr. C. Wortendyke N. Zuckerman Metro-North and Long Island Committees Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, New York Monday, 9/21/2015 8:30 - 10:00 AM ET 1. Public Comments Period 2. Approval of Minutes - July 20, 2015 a. MNR Minutes MNR Minutes - Page 6 b. LIRR Minutes LIRR Minutes - Page 10 3. 2015 Work Plans a. MNR 2015 Work Plan MNR 2015 Work Plan - Page 16 b. LIRR 2015 Work Plan LIRR 2015 WORK PLAN - Page 22 4. AGENCY PRESIDENTS’/CHIEF’S REPORTS a. MNR Report (no material) July Safety Report July Safety Report - Page 26 June Safety Report June Safety Report - Page 29 Enhanced Safety Update Enhanced Safety Update - Page 32 b. LIRR Report (no material) Safety/Enhanced Safety Update c. MTA Capital Construction Report MTA Capital Construction Report - Page 33 d. MTA Police Report MTA Police August Report MTA Police August Report - Page 39 MTA Police July Report MTA Police July Report - Page 46 5. AGENCY ACTION ITEMS a. MNR Action Item NYSDOT Grant for Connecting Services NYSDOT Grant for Connecting Services - Page 53 6. AGENCY INFORMATION ITEMS a. Joint Information Items 2016 Preliminary Budget (Public Comment) b. MNR Information Items MNR 2015 Mid-Year Forecast MNR 2015 Mid-Year Forecast - Page 55 MNR Diversity-EEO Report - 2nd Q 2015 MNR Diversity-EEO Report - 2nd Q 2015 - Page 65 Track Program Quarterly Update Track Program Quarterly Update - Page 75 c.
    [Show full text]
  • From Museums to Film Studios, the Creative Sector Is One of New York City’S Most Important Economic Assets
    CREATIVE NEW YORK From museums to film studios, the creative sector is one of New York City’s most important economic assets. But the city’s working artists, nonprofit arts groups and for-profit creative firms face a growing number of challenges. June 2015 www.nycfuture.org CREATIVE NEW YORK Written by Adam Forman and edited by David Giles, Jon- CONTENTS athan Bowles and Gail Robinson. Additional research support from from Xiaomeng Li, Travis Palladino, Nicho- las Schafran, Ryan MacLeod, Chirag Bhatt, Amanda INTRODUCTION 3 Gold and Martin Yim. Cover photo by Ari Moore. Cover design by Amy ParKer. Interior design by Ahmad Dowla. A DECADE OF CHANGE 17 Neighborhood changes, rising rents and technology spark This report was made possible by generous support anxiety and excitement from New York Community Trust, Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, Laurie M. Tisch Illumination Fund, Rock- SOURCES OF STRENGTH 27 efeller Brothers Fund and Edelman. Talent, money and media make New York a global creative capital CENTER FOR AN URBAN FUTURE CREATIVE VOICES FROM AROUND THE WORLD 33 120 Wall St., Fl. 20 New YorK, NY 10005 Immigrants enrich New York’s creative sector www.nycfuture.org THE AFFORDABILITY CRISIS 36 Center for an Urban Future is a results-oriented New Exorbitant rents, a shortage of space and high costs York City-based think tank that shines a light on the most critical challenges and opportunities facing New ADDITIONAL CHALLENGES 36 YorK, with a focus on expanding economic opportunity, New York City’s chief barriers to variety and diversity creating jobs and improving the lives of New York’s most vulnerable residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Lightsmonday, out February 10, 2020 Photo by Teresa Mettela 50¢ 57,000 Queensqueensqueens Residents Lose Power Volumevolume 65, 65, No
    VolumeVol.Volume 66, No. 65,65, 80 No.No. 207207 MONDAY,MONDAY,THURSDAY, FEBRUARYFEBRUARY AUGUST 6,10,10, 2020 20202020 50¢ A tree fell across wires in Queens Village, knocking out power and upending a chunk of sidewalk. VolumeQUEENSQUEENS 65, No. 207 LIGHTSMONDAY, OUT FEBRUARY 10, 2020 Photo by Teresa Mettela 50¢ 57,000 QueensQueensQueens residents lose power VolumeVolume 65, 65, No. No. 207 207 MONDAY,MONDAY, FEBRUARY FEBRUARY 10, 10, 2020 2020 50¢50¢ VolumeVol.VolumeVol.VolumeVol. 66, 66,66, No.65, No. No.65,65, 80No. 80 85No.No. 207 207207 MONDAY,THURSDAY,MONDAY,MONDAY,MONDAY,THURSDAY,THURSDAY,THURSDAY, FEBRUARY FEBRUARYFEBRUARYFEBRUARY AUGUST AUGUST AUGUSTAUGUST 6,10, 13, 6,10, 6, 10,10,2020 202020202020 20202020 50¢50¢50¢ Volume 65, No. 207 MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2020 50¢ VolumeVol.TODAY 66, No.65, 80No. 207 MONDAY,THURSDAY, FEBRUARY AUGUST 6,10, 2020 2020 A tree fell across wires in50¢ TODAY AA tree tree fell fell across across wires wires in in TODAY QueensQueensQueens Village, Village, Village, knocking knocking knocking Moratoriumoutoutout power power power and and and upending upending upending A treeaa chunk a chunkfell chunk across of of ofsidewalk. sidewalk. sidewalk.wires in VolumeVolumeVolumeQUEENSQUEENSQUEENSQUEENS 65, 65, No. No. 207 207 LIGHTSLIGHTSduring intenseMONDAY,MONDAY,MONDAY, OUT OUTOUT FEBRUARY FEBRUARYFEBRUARY 10, 10,10, 2020 20202020 QueensPhotoPhoto PhotoVillage, by by Teresaby Teresa Teresa knocking Mettela Mettela Mettela 50¢50¢50¢ QUEENS out power and upending 57,00057,000 Queens QueensQueensQueensQueensQueensQueensQueens
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Music: Bottom-Up Culture for New York City Understanding the Value of Music Performances in Subway Stations
    Underground Music: Bottom-up Culture for New York City Understanding the Value of Music Performances in Subway Stations Course: Markets, Design & the City | Professor: Alain Bertaud | Student: Francisca Benitez | Spring 2017 INTRODUCTION On May 4, 2015, the world-renowned band U2 performed in disguised in one of New York City’s subway stations. After gathering a small crowd and some looks for a couple of minutes, they got off their buskers’ costumes and played for approximately forty people. That same year, the band was in third place in the list of highest-grossing tours of 2015, with their Innocence + Experience World Tour taking in $133.6 million (Forbes, 2016). The thirty-six shows in North America were sold out, with an average ticket price of $117. That day on Grand Central Subway, people could see them for the price of a subway ride. As U2 did that time, there are many musicians that busk daily in NYC subway stops to reach a big and diverse audience. They do it as their main source of income, for practice and/or for promotional reasons. With an average weekday ridership of 5,650,610 passengers in 2015 (MTA, 2016), subway stations have one of the biggest audiences in the world (as a reference, the 36 shows in U2’s North American tour accounted for 650,682 tickets sold). According to the Center for an Urban Future, one of New York City’s main comparative advantages is its cultural sector. That being said, its cultural assets are unequally distributed across the city and concentrated in its most affluent neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • T,' H".I,Mt.I-Ii'.N Ij .'J~:I¡;'Ii ,@
    ~~~ T,' H".I,mT.I-Ii'.N ij .'j~:i¡;'ii ,@ (i; ~~~ T. ¡'"H." "l,m.T. ..'......E...~ rN' WLIW:~ì. ; i\ 'j; v NET.ORG is a House of Ideas. A luminous destination in the media landscape. From the streets and neighborhoods of New York City to the far reaches of AmericaJ this vibrant institution invites people to see in new ways, to be touched by creativity and inspiration, to revel in discovery and wonder. Built on a mission to educate, celebrate, innovateJ and inspire, this House of Ideas promotes a vision of people more deeply connected to the world around them. During 2008-09, WNET.ORG harnessed the highest potential of public media in pursuit of its mission. Through its array of broadcast and online outlets, it reported the news of the day. opened channels of dialogue on critical issues facing American citizensJ showcased the artists that define the pinnacle of cultural expression in our timeJ and made opportunities for lifelong learning available to all. All that WNET.ORG undertakes is made possible by the generous support of individuals and organizations that believe in our mission. In this reportJ we look back at some of the highlights from the House of Ideas during the year 2008-09. Here, we also recognize the vital contributions of those supporters who have empowered our unique vision. Thanks to their commitment, our mission-driven media continues to touch the minds and hearts of millions every day. z o ~INSPIRE -~ PEOPLE OF ALL AGES AND WALKS OF LIFE WITH MEDIA THAT IS , POWERFUL, RESONANT AND UNIQUE.
    [Show full text]
  • Busking Regulation and the Formation of Property Rights
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYU\87-4\NYU405.txt unknown Seq: 1 25-SEP-12 11:50 DEMSETZ UNDERGROUND: BUSKING REGULATION AND THE FORMATION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS JAMES GRAHAM LAKE* The Metropolitan Transit Authority regulates busking—playing music or per- forming for tips in a public place—differently depending on the subway station. Some stations are reserved for members of a program called Music Under New York (MUNY), while at the others, anyone willing to pay the standard fare to enter the station is allowed to busk. As it happens, the distribution of MUNY and non- MUNY stations within the subway system follows an economic pattern. MUNY covers the stations where we should expect busking to impose the highest externality costs. This economic pattern of coverage provides the substantive basis for this Note: Because MUNY’s distribution is consistent with Harold Demsetz’s founda- tional theory about the economic development of private property rights, MUNY provides a window into a question left open by Demsetz and contested in subse- quent literature—the question of how private property develops. This Note ana- lyzes MUNY to make two contributions to the growing body of literature describing how property rights develop. First, observing the role that changing First Amendment doctrine played in MUNY’s formation, this Note argues that exoge- nous legal norms act as constraints on the mechanisms through which new property rights develop. Second, it argues that Demsetz’s theory should take account of the inertia built into property systems and the external shocks that help overcome this stasis. INTRODUCTION ................................................. 1101 R I.
    [Show full text]
  • LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD NASSAU TOWER 71 MAIN STREET Mineola Nassau County New York
    LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD NASSAU TOWER 71 MAIN STREET Mineola Nassau County New York HABS LEVEL II – DOCUMENTATION FOR DEMOLITION PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED MEASURED DRAWINGS The Nassau Tower, August 14, 2018. NEW YORK STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Peebles Island Resource Center P.O. Box 189 Waterford, NY 12188 LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD, NASSAU TOWER SHPO PR No. 16PR03614 (Page 2) TABLE OF CONTENTS Index to Photographs & Documentation Maps ............................................................... 4 Photographs ..................................................................................................................... 8 Historic Narrative ............................................................................................................ 38 Part I. Historical Information A. Physical History................................................................................................... 40 B. Historical Context ................................................................................................ 41 Part II. Architectural Information A. General Statement 1. Architectural Character ................................................................................ 49 2. Condition of Fabric ...................................................................................... 49 B. Description of Exterior 1. Overall Dimensions ..................................................................................... 49 2. Foundations .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Donna Clower NY Firms Chasing Acquired by News Corp
    nb23p01.qxp 6/1/2007 7:42 PM Page 1 TOP STORIES RETAIL Cosmetics firms REPORT look to boost sales Local chains thrive with lines of skin- even as national whitening products stores invade PAGE 2 ® PAGE 19 Shadows at the track: the hard lives of workers VOL. XXIII, NO. 23 WWW.NEWYORKBUSINESS.COM JUNE 4-10, 2007 PRICE: $3.00 at Belmont PAGE 3 INSPIRED MOVES: Indie label founder Mike Muse, shown at Albany may Crain’s supports Electric Lady Studios, mayor’s plan for says that “the music space is wide-open congestion pricing to anyone.” move on EDITORIAL, PAGE 12 New tune for radio: It’s time for country big issues music station VALERIE BLOCK, PAGE 13 Measures stymied ON THE AGENDA Improved voting for years now front machines won’t be WICKS LAW After 86 years, ready for 2008; and center in final major overhaul may be at hand weeks of Legislature ARTICLE X Rules for siting Farrell for speaker? power plants are sparking THE INSIDER, PAGE 14 discontent BY ERIK ENGQUIST CAMPAIGN FINANCE Last-minute deal is possible BUSINESS LIVES with less than three weeks re- maining in the legislative session, CONGESTION PRICING No lawmakers are plowing through a quick fix on plan to charge slew of thorny proposals and could vehicular fees in Manhattan reach compromises on measures that have been ensnared in Albany gridlock for years. innocent inmates. But disagree- Atop the list:reforming the out- ment remains on those issues as dated Wicks Law governing pub- well as the more contentious ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the a and C Lines
    Review of the A and C Lines ,. December 11, 2015 Page intentionally left blank AC Line Review Executive Summary Executive Summary The attached report provides a comprehensive review of operations on the A and C lines. Combined, the two lines serve 800,000 riders a day across three boroughs and connect to many of the most important intermodal hubs in New York City. The A differs from most other New York City Transit subway lines in that its route splits three ways at its southern end in eastern Queens. It is also exceptionally long, at 32 miles between 207 St and Far Rockaway-Mott Av. Like many other subway lines, it merges several times with other lines. The combination of these traits tends to reduce reliability. In contrast, the C is a shorter line scheduled to run less frequently than the A and many other lines. C service is relatively reliable, even though it has historically been assigned some of the oldest cars in the system. This review has been prepared within the context of NYC Transit’s service planning procedures, and all discussions of service levels take into account established guidelines for designing and scheduling service. NYC Transit determines how many trains run on a given line based on a number of factors, including line capacity, equipment availability, and the Rapid Transit Loading Guidelines. The Guidelines ensure that limited resources are equitably allocated throughout the system by establishing, by time of day, maximum passenger load levels and minimum service frequencies, where operationally feasible. The Guidelines are applied by evaluating average ridership levels at locations where trains are most heavily loaded (“peak load points”) to develop recommended service frequencies, where operationally feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadly Crossing by Mark J
    1935 - 2013 VOLUME 44 NUMBER 4 DISTRICT 2 - CHAPTER WEBSITE: WWW.NRHS1.ORG APRIL 2013 DEADLY CROSSING BY MARK J. PRICE - AKRON BEACON JOURNAL STAFF WRITER Precious seconds ticked away as the Ohio National Guard convoy rumbled through the streets of Barberton (Ohio). Time was the enemy. Unexpected delays and unfortunate circumstances put the armored military vehicles on a collision course with disaster. When the locomotive's horn shrieked, it already was too late. An Erie Railroad passenger train slammed into a 33-ton Army tank on April 29, 1951, in a tragic accident that caught everyone by surprise. ''It sounded like the whole end of Barberton was blowing up when the train hit the tank,'' eyewitness Earl Lybarger told the Beacon Journal after the crash. ''My wife fainted when she saw the locomotive would not miss the tank.'' If only a few things had gone right, it would have been just another Sunday afternoon. More than 60 members from Company B of the 137th Tank Battalion in Barberton took a four-hour slog to Greensburg and back. In a pelting rain, a Summit County sheriff's cruiser led a ''motor march'' of National Guard trucks, jeeps and tanks to a practice field at state routes 241 and 619. The reserve unit conducted maneuvers before beginning the return trip to Barberton. Near the AN OHIO NATIONAL GUARD TANK SITS ASTRIDE TWISTED RAILS AFTER BEING STRUCK BY AN ERIE city limits, the convoy sputtered. One of its three Sherman tanks ran out of gas RAILROAD PASSENGER TRAIN ON APRIL 29, 1951, AT THE FAIRVIEW AVENUE CROSSING IN because of a faulty fuel gauge.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    GRIFFITH JOURNAL OF LAW & HUMAN DIGNITY Editor-in-Chief Felicia Lal Special Issue Deputy Executive Editors Editor Ada Sculthorp Molly Jackson Eleesa Panton Michelle Gunawan Editors Alex Vanenn Josephine Vernon Alexandria Neumann Lachlan Robb Ashlee Robin Michelle Gunawan Genevieve White Renee Curtis Isa Martin Tara Mulroy Isabelle Quinn Thomas Browning Issac Avery Thomas Finn Jake Carew Consulting Executive Editor Dr Allan Ardill Special Art Issue 2015 Published in August 2015, Gold Coast, Australia by the Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity ISSN: 2203-3114 CONTENTS FELICIA LAL THE ART OF HUMAN DIGNITY AND THE HUMAN 1 DIGNITY OF ART: EDITORIAL ANTHONY LISTER PUBLIC SPACES: PUBLIC PEOPLE 5 L-FRESH THE LION WHY BLEND IN WHEN YOU WERE BORN TO 11 STAND OUT: A STORY OF RAP, RELIGION, AND RIGHTS BRUCE BAER ARNOLD SEEING THROUGH THE IMAGE: ART, DIGNITY, 15 & WENDY BONYTHON AND RESPONSIBILITY MATTHEW CHRISTIAN NOTES FROM UNDERGROUND: ARTISTIC RISK AND 31 POTENTIAL IN THE NEW YORK SUBWAY JARROD WHEATLEY THE WRITING IS ON THE WALL: AN ASSET-BASED 41 APPROACH TO STREET ART JAY SANDERSON & ARE MUSICIANS FULL OF IT? THE METAPHORICAL 53 LEANNE WISEMAN AND FIGURATIVE POWER OF SUBCONSCIOUS COPYING IN COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CASES CRISP ONE PERSON’S VANDALISM IS ANOTHER’S 67 MASTERPIECE ADAM JARDINE WOLVES AMONG US: SOME BRIEF REFLECTIONS 73 ON THE “BONA FIDES” OF GENDERED VIOLENCE IN COMPUTER GAME ART KAREN CRAWLEY BEYOND THE WAR ON GRAFFITI: THE RIGHT 85 TO VISUAL EXPRESSION IN URBAN SPACES NOTES FROM UNDERGROUND SPECIAL ART ISSUE 2015 NOTES FROM UNDERGROUND: ARTISTIC RISK AND POTENTIAL IN THE NEW YORK SUBWAY MATTHEW CHRISTIAN∗ New York City lives by public transit and for thirty years its underground commutes have been illuminated with spontaneous, round-the-clock, freelance artistic performance.
    [Show full text]