Revisiting FAFSA Simplification: Expanding Access to the IRS Data Retrieval Tool
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
FAFSA 2021-22 Web
Paying for a College Education Understanding the various sources of financial aid can help make college more affordable for you and your family! Personal Grants Savings Here are the five basic financial resources: grants, scholarships, loans, work-study, and personal savings. Scholarships GRANTS: Money that you don’t have to repay; based on financial need. Many Loans grants come from the federal government. • Pell Grant: The largest source of free federal money for students with financial Work-Study need. Awards range from $600 to approximately $6495 per year. • Other Federal Grants: Find out about other federal grants at studentaid.ed.gov. SCHOLARSHIPS: Money you don’t have to repay; usually based on SCHOLARSHIP WEBSITES student talents or interests. University of Hawai‘i Scholarships: • Examples include athletic, musical, or other special talents; community hawaii.edu/tuition/scholarships/ service; good grades; or academic achievements. uhfoundation.org/scholarships • Scholarships are available through religious and community organizations foundations, businesses, schools, and labor unions. Talk Scholarships for Hawai‘i Residents: to your school counselor for more information. hawaiicommunityfoundation • Beware of scholarship scams! Be alert if a company makes scholarship .org/scholarships promises, charges a fee, or asks for your credit card information to hold a scholarship. Scholarships for Native Hawaiians: oha.org/scholarships WORK-STUDY: Students with financial need can earn money through pauahi.org/apply-for-a-scholarship part-time jobs. • Colleges assist students in finding job placements. Asian & Pacific Islander Scholarships: • Non, need-based employment opportunities are also available apiasf.org through colleges. • Jobs often have flexible hours that will fit a student’s schedule. -
Explaining Charter School Effectiveness†
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2013, 5(4): 1–27 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/app.5.4.1 Explaining Charter School Effectiveness† By Joshua D. Angrist, Parag A. Pathak, and Christopher R. Walters* Lottery estimates suggest Massachusetts’ urban charter schools boost achievement well beyond that of traditional urban public schools stu- dents, while nonurban charters reduce achievement from a higher baseline. The fact that urban charters are most effective for poor nonwhites and low-baseline achievers contributes to, but does not fully explain, these differences. We therefore link school-level charter impacts to school inputs and practices. The relative efficacy of urban lottery sample charters is accounted for by these schools’ embrace of the No Excuses approach to urban education. In our Massachusetts sample, Non-No-Excuses urban charters are no more effective than nonurban charters. JEL H75, I21, I28 ( ) growing body of evidence suggests that urban charter schools have the poten- A tial to generate impressive achievement gains, especially for minority students living in high-poverty areas. In a series of studies using admissions lotteries to iden- tify causal effects, we looked at the impact of charter attendance in Boston and at a Knowledge is Power Program KIPP school in Lynn, Massachusetts Abdulkadiro g˘ lu ( ) ( et al. 2009, 2011; Angrist et al. 2010, 2012 . Boston and Lynn charter middle schools ) increase student achievement by about 0.4 standard deviations per year in math (σ) and about 0.2 per year in English Language Arts ELA . Among high school stu- σ ( ) dents, attendance at a Boston charter school increases student achievement by about 0.3 per year in math and 0.2 per year in ELA. -
FAFSA Simplification
U.S. Department of Education – Report to Congress on Efforts to Simplify the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) January 16, 2009 BACKGROUND On August 14, 2008, President Bush signed the Higher Education Opportunity Act (HEOA) (Pub. L. No. 110-315) into law, amending the Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA). Section 483(f)(2) of the HEA, as amended by the HEOA, requires the Secretary of Education (Secretary) to submit to Congress a report on some of the Secretary’s efforts to simplify the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA). Specifically, the report must provide the following information: • How the expected family contribution of a student can be calculated using substantially less income and asset information than was used on March 31, 2008; • The extent to which the reduced income and asset information will result in a redistribution of Federal grants and subsidized loans under Title IV of the HEA, State aid, or institutional aid, or in a change in the composition of the group of recipients of such aid and the amount of such redistribution; • How the alternative approaches for calculating the expected family contribution will rely mainly, in the case of students and parents who file income tax returns, on information available on the 1040, 1040EZ and 1040A tax forms, and include formulas for adjusting income or asset information to produce similar results to the existing approach with less data; • How the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) can provide to the Secretary income and other data needed to compute an expected -
Dynarski, Joshua Hyman and Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach∗ October 16, 2011
Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Childhood Investments on Postsecondary Attainment and Degree Completion Susan Dynarski, Joshua Hyman and Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach∗ October 16, 2011 Abstract This paper examines the effect of early childhood investments on college enrollment and degree completion. We use the random assignment in the Project STAR experiment to estimate the effect of smaller classes in primary school on college entry, college choice, and degree completion. We improve on existing work in this area with unusually de- tailed data on college enrollment spells and the previously unexplored outcome of college degree completion. We find that assignment to a small class increases the probability of attending college by 2.7 percentage points, with effects more than twice as large among blacks. Among those with the lowest ex ante probability of attending college, the ef- fect is 11 percentage points. Smaller classes increase the likelihood of earning a college degree by 1.6 percentage points and shift students towards high-earning fields such as STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics), business and economics. We confirm the standard finding that test score effects fade out by middle school, but show that test score effects at the time of the experiment are an excellent predictor of long- term improvements in postsecondary outcomes. We compare the costs and impacts of this intervention with other tools for increasing postsecondary attainment, such as Head Start and financial aid, and conclude that early investments are no more cost effective than later investments in boosting adult educational attainment. ∗We thank Jayne Zaharias-Boyd of HEROS and the Tennessee Department of Education for allowing the match between the STAR and National Student Clearinghouse data. -
Who Benefits from KIPP?
Who Benefits from KIPP? Joshua Angrist, MIT Susan Dynarski, University of Michigan Thomas Kane, Harvard Graduate School of Education Parag Pathak, MIT Christopher Walters, MIT Education Policy Initiative Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy 735 S. State Street Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 EPI Working Papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by EPI co-Directors. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Education Policy Initiative or any sponsoring agency. EPI Working Paper 03-2010 | February, 2010 WHO BENEFITS FROM KIPP? Joshua D. Angrist Susan M. Dynarski Thomas J. Kane Parag A. Pathak Christopher R. Walters Originalyl posted as NBER Working Paper #15740 The authors are grateful to Josh Zoia and Esther Vargas at KIPP Academy Lynn and to Carrie Conaway at the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education for data, patience and assistance. We received valuable assistance from Sarah Cohodes and Jon Fullerton. We also thank Eric Bettinger for helpful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Education Policy Initiative. © 2010 by Joshua D. Angrist, Susan M. Dynarski, Thomas J. Kane, Parag A. Pathak, and Christopher R. Walters. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Who Benefits from KIPP? Joshua D. Angrist, Susan M. Dynarski, Thomas J. -
Your Federal Student Loans: Learn the Basics and Manage Your Debt, Washington, D.C., 2010
Your Federal Student Loans Learn the Basics and Manage Your Debt Websites and Contact Information Student Aid on the Web www.studentaid.ed.gov Your source for in-depth information on preparing for and funding education beyond high school. FAFSA on the WebSM www.fafsa.gov Apply online for federal student aid. National Student Loan Data SystemSM (NSLDSSM) www.nslds.ed.gov Use your Federal Student Aid PIN to access your federal student loan records. Military www.studentaid.ed.gov/military If you are in the armed forces or have a family member in the service, visit this site to find out more about grants, repayment, and forgiveness options. MyMoney.gov www.mymoney.gov Several general government agencies offer advice on how to manage your money. Office of Inspector General Hotline To report student aid fraud (including identity theft), waste, or abuse of U.S. Department of Education funds. 1-800-MIS-USED (1-800-647-8733) E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ed.gov/misused Federal Student Aid Information Center (FSAIC) To call or write if you have questions on federal student aid. 1-800-4-FED-AID (1-800-433-3243) TTY users can call 1-800-730-8913. Callers in locations without access to 1-800 numbers may call 319-337-5665. E-mail: [email protected] P.O. Box 84 Washington, DC 20044-0084 Cover photos: U.S. Department of Education U.S. Department of Education Federal Student Aid U.S. Department of Education Arne Duncan Secretary Federal Student Aid William J. Taggart Chief Operating Officer Student Experience Group Michele Y. -
Funding Your College Education: Financial Aid 101
FUNDING YOUR COLLEGE EDUCATION: FINANCIAL AID 101 PRESENTER: MARY LYNN DIXON ADVISOR AGENDA • What is Financial Aid? • How do colleges award Financial Aid? • What is the Financial Aid application process? • What to do if the family’s financial situation has changed? • What types of aid can be included on the award letter? • What are the best ways to find scholarships? WHAT IS FINANCIAL AID? • Any funds provided to students and families to help pay for college expenses • Sources of Financial Aid: • Federal Government • State Government • Institutional • Private Sources LOANS ARE CONSIDERED FINANCIAL AID! TWO TYPES OF FINANCIAL AID… Gift Aid Self-Help Aid • Funds which do not • Funds which must be need to be repaid repaid or earned Example: Example: • Federal or State Grants • Loans • Scholarships • Work Study HOW DO COLLEGES AWARD AID? COLLEGES AWARD AID BASED ON… Merit • Often notified after accepted for admission • Based on GPA and/or ACT/SAT test scores, special talents, athletic abilities, leadership/service Financial Need • Notified between December and April from the FA office • Cost of Attendance - EFC = Financial Need Tuition and Fees Room and Board Books and Supplies Transportation Miscellaneous Expenses EXPECTED FAMILY CONTRIBUTION (EFC) EFC is an index number calculated when the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) is submitted by the student. The EFC is NOT what a student will pay for a year of college. EFC Factors: • Parental Income • Family Size • Parental Assets (excluding retirement • Number in College account -
Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Request
Department of Education P. STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Request CONTENTS Page Appropriations Language .......................................................................................................... P-1 Analysis of Language Provisions and Changes ........................................................................ P-2 Appropriation, Adjustments and Transfers ................................................................................ P-3 Summary of Changes ............................................................................................................... P-4 Authorizing Legislation .............................................................................................................. P-5 Appropriations History ............................................................................................................... P-6 Significant Items in FY 2021 Appropriations Reports ............................................................... P-7 Summary of Request ................................................................................................................ P-8 Activities: Federal Pell Grants ............................................................................................................. P-10 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants ..................................................... P-23 Federal Work-study ............................................................................................................ P-28 Iraq and Afghanistan -
2021-2022 Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA)
FAFSA July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2022 FREE APPLICATION for FEDERAL STUDENT AID Pay attention to any symbols listed after your state deadline. Use this form to apply free for federal and state student States and territories not included in the main listing below: AL, AS*, AZ, CO, FM*, GA, GU*, HI*, KY^$, MH*, NC^$, ND^$, NE, NH*, grants, work-study, and loans. NM, OK^$, PR, PW*, RI*, SD*, VA*, VI*, VT^$*, WA^, WI and WY*. Or apply free online at fafsa.gov. State Deadline Alaska Education Grant ^ $ AK Apply by the Deadlines Alaska Performance Scholarship: June 30, 2021 # $ For federal aid, submit your application as early as possible, but no earlier than Academic Challenge: July 1, 2021 (date received) October 1, 2020. We must receive your application no later than June 30, 2022. Your AR ArFuture Grant: Fall term, July 1, 2021 (date received); spring term, Jan. 10, college must have your correct, complete information by your last day of enrollment 2022 (date received) For many state financial aid programs: March 2, 2021 (date postmarked). in the 2021-2022 school year. Cal Grant also requires submission of a school-certified GPA by March 2, 2021. For state or college aid, the deadline may be as early as October 2020. See the table to For additional community college Cal Grants: Sept. 2, 2021 (date postmarked). the right for state deadlines. You may also need to complete additional forms. CA For noncitizens without a Social Security card or with one issued through the federal Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, fill out Check with your high school counselor or a financial aid administrator at your college the California Dream Act Application. -
College Grants on a Postcard: a Proposal for Simple and Predictable Federal Student Aid
THE Advancing Opportunity, HAMILTON Prosperity and Growth PROJECT POLICY BRIEF NO. 2007-01 FEBRUARY 2007 College Grants on a Postcard: A Proposal for Simple and Predictable Federal Student Aid EACH YEAR, in an effort to increase college attendance, the federal government provides college aid worth approximately $16 billion through Pell grants and the Hope and Lifetime Learning tax credits. The idea behind this aid is straightforward: more students, especially those from low- and middle-income families, would go to col- lege if they could afford it. But while in theory federal student aid should increase college enrollment, there is scant evidence that the current system does so. It doesn’t have to be this way. Other programs have been effective at increasing college enrollment rates. What distinguishes these programs is that they are simple and deliver information early enough to affect student decisions. In contrast, the federal student aid system puts up a barrier of complicated paperwork and doesn’t tell students how much aid they are eligible for until after they have had to decide whether to apply to college. In a discussion paper for The Hamilton Project, Susan M. Dynarski and Judith Scott-Clayton of Harvard University propose a dramatically simplified aid process that could increase college enrollment by as much as 7.4 percentage points among the grant-eligible population. Under their proposal, students could determine their grant aid eligibility by consulting a simple table that is small enough to fit on a postcard. The application process would be as easy as checking a box on the family’s regular tax returns. -
Financial Aid Policy: Lessons from Research
Financial Aid Policy: Lessons from Research Susan M. Dynarski, University of Michigan Judith Scott-Clayton, Teachers College Education Policy Initiative Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy 735 S. State Street Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 EPI Working Papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by EPI co-Directors. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Education Policy Initiative or any sponsoring agency. EPI Working Paper 02-2013 | January, 2013 FINANCIAL AID POLICY: LESSONS FROM RESEARCH Susan Dynarski Judith Scott-Clayton Originally posted as NBER Working Paper #18710 Funding for this research provided by The Future of Children, a collaboration of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public & International Affairs at Princeton University and the Brookings Institution" and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Education Policy Initiative. © 2013 by The Trustees of Princeton University, circulated with permission. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Financial Aid Policy: Lessons from Research Susan Dynarski and Judith Scott-Clayton January 2013 ABSTRACT In the nearly fifty years since the adoption of the Higher Education Act of 1965, financial aid programs have grown in scale, expanded in scope, and multiplied in form. As a result, financial aid has become the norm among college enrollees. -
Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Childhood Investments on Postsecondary Attainment and Degree Completion
Experimental Evidence on the E↵ect of Childhood Investments on Postsecondary Attainment and Degree Completion Susan Dynarski, Joshua Hyman and Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach⇤ October 16, 2011 Abstract This paper examines the e↵ect of early childhood investments on college enrollment and degree completion. We use the random assignment in the Project STAR experiment to estimate the e↵ect of smaller classes in primary school on college entry, college choice, and degree completion. We improve on existing work in this area with unusually de- tailed data on college enrollment spells and the previously unexplored outcome of college degree completion. We find that assignment to a small class increases the probability of attending college by 2.7 percentage points, with e↵ects more than twice as large among blacks. Among those with the lowest ex ante probability of attending college, the e↵ect is 11 percentage points. Smaller classes increase the likelihood of earning a college degree by 1.6 percentage points and shift students towards high-earning fields such as STEM (science, technology, engineering and medicine), business and economics. We confirm the standard finding that test score e↵ects fade out by middle school, but show that test score e↵ects at the time of the experiment are an excellent predictor of long-term improvements in postsecondary outcomes. We compare the costs and impacts of this in- tervention with other tools for increasing postsecondary attainment, such as Head Start and financial aid, and conclude that early investments are no more cost e↵ective than later investments in boosting adult educational attainment.