DOCSLIB.ORG

Drug Class Review on Beta Adrenergic Blockers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drug Class Review on Beta Adrenergic Blockers Drug Class Review on Beta Adrenergic Blockers Final Report May 2005 The purpose of this report is to make available information regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of different drugs within pharmaceutical classes. Reports are not usage guidelines, nor should they be read as an endorsement of, or recommendation for, any particular drug, use or approach. Oregon Health & Science University does not recommend or endorse any guideline or recommendation developed by users of these reports. Mark Helfand, MD, MPH Kim Peterson, MS Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center Oregon Health & Science University Mark Helfand, MD, MPH, Director Copyright © 2005 by Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon 97201. All rights reserved. Final Report Update 2 Drug Effectiveness Review Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................................................................................................................4 Scope and Key Questions ........................................................................................6 Methods...............................................................................................................................7 Study Selection ........................................................................................................7 Data Abstraction ......................................................................................................8 Quality Assessment..................................................................................................9 Data Synthesis..........................................................................................................9 Results .................................................................................................................................9 Key Question 1. For adult patients with various indications, do beta blockers differ in efficacy?..........................................................................9 1a. Hypertension .........................................................................................9 1b. Angina..................................................................................................12 1c. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting ........................................................14 1d. Recent Myocardial Infarction ..............................................................14 1e. Heart Failure.........................................................................................19 1f. Atrial arrhythmias.................................................................................29 1g. Migraine Headache ..............................................................................30 1h. Bleeding esophageal varices................................................................33 Key Question 2. For adult patients with various indications, do beta blockers differ in adverse effects?....................................................35 Key Question 3. Are there subgroups for which one beta blocker is more effective or associated with fewer adverse events? ......................................38 Summary...........................................................................................................................39 References.........................................................................................................................44 In-text Tables Table 1. Beta blockers included in the review.........................................................4 Table 2. Approved indications.................................................................................5 Table 3. Included outcome measures.......................................................................8 Table 4. Quality of Life outcomes in HTH trials of hypertensives .......................11 Table 5. Results of head to head trials in patients with angina..............................13 Table 6. Comparison of outcomes of mortality-reducing beta blockers in patients following myocardial infarction...............................................15 Table 7. Summary of results from placebo-controlled trials of beta blocker therapy following myocardial infarction ...................................................18 Table 8. Main findings in placebo-controlled trials of patients with mild-moderate heart failure........................................................................20 Table 9. Comparison of major beta blocker trials in heart failure.........................21 Table 10. Patient characteristics and annualized mortality rates adjusted for active drug run-in periods in trials of beta blockers for heart failure ........24 Table 11. Outcomes in placebo controlled trials of beta blockers for heart failure ..............................................................................................26 Table 12. Outcomes in head-to-head trials of migraine patients ...........................31 Table 13. Variceal rebleeding rates .......................................................................34 Table 14. Death due to variceal rebleeding ...........................................................35 Table 15. All cause mortality in patients with bleeding esophageal varices .........35 Beta Adrenergic Blockers Page 2 of 414 Final Report Update 2 Drug Effectiveness Review Project Table 16. Results of Shekelle (2003) meta-analysis by gender, race and diabetics .....................................................................................................38 Table 17. Strength of the evidence ........................................................................39 Table 18. Summary of comparative efficacy.........................................................42 Evidence Tables Evidence Table 1. Randomized controlled trials for hypertension........................54 Evidence Table 1a. Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials for hypertension .........................................................................................78 Evidence Table 2. Randomized controlled trials for angina..................................87 Evidence Table 2a. Quality assessments of randomized controlled trials for angina ................................................................................................103 Evidence Table 3. Randomized controlled trials for coronary artery bypass graft ..............................................................................................109 Evidence Table 3a. Quality assessments of randomized controlled trials for coronary artery bypass graft...............................................................112 Evidence Table 4. Randomized controlled trials for post myocardial infarction..................................................................................................115 Evidence Table 4a. Quality assessments of randomized controlled trials for post myocardial infarction..................................................................160 Evidence Table 5. Placebo controlled trials for heart failure..............................172 Evidence Table 5a. Quality assessments of placebo controlled trials for heart failure ..............................................................................................236 Evidence Table 5b. Head to head trials for heart failure .....................................260 Evidence Table 5c. Quality assessments of head to head trials for heart failure.269 Evidence Table 6. Outcomes of head to head trials for heart failure...................281 Evidence Table 7. Randomized controlled trials for arrhythmia.........................283 Evidence Table 7a. Quality assessments of randomized controlled trials for arrhythmia ..........................................................................................292 Evidence Table 8. Placebo controlled trials for migraine....................................296 Evidence Table 8a. Quality assessments of placebo controlled trials for migraine..............................................................................................353 Evidence Table 9. Randomized controlled trials for bleeding esophageal varices ......................................................................................................365 Evidence Table 9a. Quality assessments of randomized controlled trials for bleeding esophageal varices...............................................................383 Evidence Table 10. Adverse events in head to head trials for hypertension .......389 Evidence Table 11. Safety of all head to head trials of beta blockers .................391 Figures Figure 1. Total mortality in patients following MI .............................................393 Figure 2. Effect of beta blockers on all cause mortality in patients with mild-moderate heart failure in placebo controlled trials..........................394 Appendices Appendix A. Search strategy ..............................................................................395 Appendix B. Quality assessment methods for drug class reviews......................398 Appendix C. List of included studies..................................................................402 Beta Adrenergic Blockers Page 3 of 414 Final Report Update 2 Drug Effectiveness Review Project INTRODUCTION Beta blockers inhibit the chronotropic, inotropic and vasoconstrictor responses to the catecholamines, epinephrine and norepinephrine. Most beta blockers have half-lives of over six hours (Table 1). The shortest acting are pindolol (3-4 hours) and propranolol
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Drug Class Review Beta Adrenergic Blockers
    Drug Class Review Beta Adrenergic Blockers Final Report Update 4 July 2009 Update 3: September 2007 Update 2: May 2005 Update 1: September 2004 Original Report: September 2003 The literature on this topic is scanned periodically. The purpose of this report is to make available information regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of different drugs within pharmaceutical classes. Reports are not usage guidelines, nor should they be read as an endorsement of, or recommendation for, any particular drug, use, or approach. Oregon Health & Science University does not recommend or endorse any guideline or recommendation developed by users of these reports. Mark Helfand, MD, MPH Kim Peterson, MS Vivian Christensen, PhD Tracy Dana, MLS Sujata Thakurta, MPA:HA Drug Effectiveness Review Project Marian McDonagh, PharmD, Principal Investigator Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center Mark Helfand, MD, MPH, Director Oregon Health & Science University Copyright © 2009 by Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon 97239. All rights reserved. Final Report Update 4 Drug Effectiveness Review Project TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 6 Purpose and Limitations of Evidence Reports........................................................................................ 8 Scope and Key Questions .................................................................................................................... 10 METHODS.................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ADHD Parents Medication Guide Revised July 2013
    ADHD Parents Medication Guide Revised July 2013 Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Prepared by: American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and American Psychiatric Association Supported by the Elaine Schlosser Lewis Fund Physician: ___________________________________________________ Address: ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________________ ADHD Parents Medication Guide – July 2013 2 Introduction Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by difficulty paying attention, excessive activity, and impulsivity (acting before you think). ADHD is usually identified when children are in grade school but can be diagnosed at any time from preschool to adulthood. Recent studies indicate that almost 10 percent of children between the ages of 4 to 17 are reported by their parents as being diagnosed with ADHD. So in a classroom of 30 children, two to three children may have ADHD.1,2,3,4,5 Short attention spans and high levels of activity are a normal part of childhood. For children with ADHD, these behaviors are excessive, inappropriate for their age, and interfere with daily functioning at home, school, and with peers. Some children with ADHD only have problems with attention; other children only have issues with hyperactivity and impulsivity; most children with ADHD have problems with all three. As they grow into adolescence and young adulthood, children with ADHD may become less hyperactive yet continue to have significant problems with distraction, disorganization, and poor impulse control. ADHD can interfere with a child’s ability to perform in school, do homework, follow rules, and develop and maintain peer relationships. When children become adolescents, ADHD can increase their risk of dropping out of school or having disciplinary problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors Single Entity Agents
    Therapeutic Class Overview Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors Single Entity Agents Therapeutic Class Overview/Summary: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is the most important component in the homeostatic regulation of blood pressure.1,2 Excessive activity of the RAAS may lead to hypertension and disorders of fluid and electrolyte imbalance.3 Renin catalyzes the conversion of angiotensinogen to angiotensin I. Angiotensin I is then cleaved to angiotensin II by angiotensin- converting enzyme (ACE). Angiotensin II may also be generated through other pathways (angiotensin I convertase).1 Angiotensin II can increase blood pressure by direct vasoconstriction and through actions on the brain and autonomic nervous system.1,3 In addition, angiotensin II stimulates aldosterone synthesis from the adrenal cortex, leading to sodium and water reabsorption. Angiotensin II exerts other detrimental cardiovascular effects including ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling and myocyte apoptosis.1,2 The ACE inhibitors block the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, and also inhibit the breakdown of bradykinin, a potent vasodilator.4 Evidence-based guidelines recognize the important role that ACE inhibitors play in the treatment of hypertension and other cardiovascular and renal diseases. With the exception of Epaned® (enalapril solution) and Qbrelis® (lisinopril solution), all of the ACE inhibitors are available generically. Table 1. Current Medications Available in Therapeutic Class5-19 Generic Food and Drug Administration
    [Show full text]
  • Advantages and Disadvantages of Beta- Adrenergic Blocking Drugs in Hypertension
    Reprinted from ANCIOLOCY Vol. 29, No. -I April 1978 Copyright 0 1978 Prinred in U.S.A. All Rights Rewrced Advantages and Disadvantages of Beta- Adrenergic Blocking Drugs in Hypertension Eoin T. O'Brien DUBLIN, IRELAND General Measures Elevation of blood pressure should be regarded as one of a number of potential risk factors for cardiovascular disease-albeit a major risk factor- rather than a disease per se.' It is important to identify additional risk factors in the hypertensive patient, not only because collectively these factors may greatly magnify the cardiovascular risk, but also because modification of them may, of itself, lower the blood pressure and thus alleviate the risk and save the patient the inconvenience, expense, and potential harm that may result from even the simplest of drug regimes. Careful consideration should be given to the patient's diet (particularly in relation to the calorie intake in the case of obesity, the cholesterol and saturated fat content in the case of hyperlipidemia and patients at high risk, and the salt content) and to smoking habits, physical activity. stress. personality, and drug therapy, especially anovulant preparations. Other diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, which are associated with a high incidence of hypertension and pri- mary causes of hypertension must be excluded. Although there is still no statistical evidence to show that modification of these risk factors-with the exception of tobacco and anovulant preparations-will actually reduce mortal- ity, it does seem prudent on the basis of the evidence available to encourage the hypertensive patient to adjust his or her life-style not only to reduce the cardiovascular risk,2 but also because in many instances the mildly hypertensive patient will respond to this approach alone.
    [Show full text]
  • The In¯Uence of Medication on Erectile Function
    International Journal of Impotence Research (1997) 9, 17±26 ß 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0955-9930/97 $12.00 The in¯uence of medication on erectile function W Meinhardt1, RF Kropman2, P Vermeij3, AAB Lycklama aÁ Nijeholt4 and J Zwartendijk4 1Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Urology, Leyenburg Hospital, Leyweg 275, 2545 CH The Hague, The Netherlands; 3Pharmacy; and 4Department of Urology, Leiden University Hospital, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands Keywords: impotence; side-effect; antipsychotic; antihypertensive; physiology; erectile function Introduction stopped their antihypertensive treatment over a ®ve year period, because of side-effects on sexual function.5 In the drug registration procedures sexual Several physiological mechanisms are involved in function is not a major issue. This means that erectile function. A negative in¯uence of prescrip- knowledge of the problem is mainly dependent on tion-drugs on these mechanisms will not always case reports and the lists from side effect registries.6±8 come to the attention of the clinician, whereas a Another way of looking at the problem is drug causing priapism will rarely escape the atten- combining available data on mechanisms of action tion. of drugs with the knowledge of the physiological When erectile function is in¯uenced in a negative mechanisms involved in erectile function. The way compensation may occur. For example, age- advantage of this approach is that remedies may related penile sensory disorders may be compen- evolve from it. sated for by extra stimulation.1 Diminished in¯ux of In this paper we will discuss the subject in the blood will lead to a slower onset of the erection, but following order: may be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Class Review Antianginal Agents
    Drug Class Review Antianginal Agents 24:12.08 Nitrates and Nitrites 24:04.92 Cardiac Drugs, Miscellaneous Amyl Nitrite Isosorbide Dinitrate (IsoDitrate ER®, others) Isosorbide Mononitrate (Imdur®) Nitroglycerin (Minitran®, Nitrostat®, others) Ranolazine (Ranexa®) Final Report May 2015 Review prepared by: Melissa Archer, PharmD, Clinical Pharmacist Carin Steinvoort, PharmD, Clinical Pharmacist Gary Oderda, PharmD, MPH, Professor University of Utah College of Pharmacy Copyright © 2015 by University of Utah College of Pharmacy Salt Lake City, Utah. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 Table 1. Antianginal Therapies .............................................................................................. 4 Table 2. Summary of Agents .................................................................................................. 5 Disease Overview ........................................................................................................................ 8 Table 3. Summary of Current Clinical Practice Guidelines .................................................... 9 Pharmacology ............................................................................................................................... 10 Table 4. Pharmacokinetic Properties
    [Show full text]
  • Beta Blocker
    Medication Information Beta Blocker Other names for this medication Acebutol Nadolol Atenolol Pindolol Bisoprolol Propanolol Carvediol Sotalol Labetalol Timolol Metoprolol There are many other names for this medication. How this medication is used This medication causes your heart to beat slower. This helps rest the heart after a heart attack. This medication helps prevent and/or reduce chest pain and irregular heart beats. It does not stop chest pain or angina after the pain has started. Bisoprolol, Carvedilol and Metoprolol can be used to prevent heart failure. They work by relaxing the blood vessels. This allows more blood to go to the heart. The more blood that goes to the heart, the more oxygen the heart gets. This helps the heart work better. Some of these medications are used to treat high blood pressure, migraine headaches and muscle tremors. Beta Blocker How to take this medication Take this medication exactly as directed by your doctor or health care provider. It must be taken regularly, even if you feel well. Do not suddenly stop taking this medication without checking with your doctor or health care provider first. Suddenly stopping this medication can cause: • chest pain • irregular heart beats • high blood pressure. When it is time to stop taking this medication your doctor or health care provider may slowly decrease the amount. If you miss a dose of this medication, take it as soon as possible. However, if it is almost time for the next dose, skip the missed dose and go back to your regular time. Do not take 2 doses at one time.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Β-Blockade Associated with Atenolol
    Pharmacodynamic HYDOXDWLRQRIȕ-blockade associated with atenolol in healthy dogs Mari Waterman Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences Jonathan A. Abbott, Chair Andrea C. Eriksson Jeffrey R. Wilcke July 30, 2018 Blacksburg, VA .H\ZRUGVDWHQROROȕ-blockade, isoproterenol, dog, pharmacodynamic Copyright 2018 Mari Waterman Pharmacodynamic HYDOXDWLRQRIȕ-blockade associated with atenolol in healthy dogs Mari Waterman ABSTRACT Objective: Dosing intervals of 12 and 24 hours for atenolol have been recommended, but an evidentiary basis is lacking. To test the hypothesis that repeated, once-daily oral administration of atenolol attenuates the heart rate response to isoproterenol for 24 hours, we performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over experiment. Animals: Twenty healthy dogs Procedures: Dogs were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (P) and then atenolol (A), [1 mg/kg PO q24h] or vice versa. Treatment periods were 5-7 days; time between periods was 7 days. Heart rates (bpm) at rest (HRr DQG GXULQJ FRQVWDQW UDWH > ȝJNJPLQ@ LQIXVLRQ RI isoproterenol (HRi) were electrocardiographically obtained 0, 0.25, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after final administration of drug or placebo. A mixed model ANOVA was used to evaluate the effects of treatment (Tr), time after drug or placebo administration (t), interaction of treatment and time (Tr*t) as well as period and sequence on HRr and HRi. Results: Sequence or period effects were not detected. There was a significant effect of Tr (p <0.0001) and Tr*t (p <0.0001) on HRi.
    [Show full text]
  • Norepinephrine Is Required to Promote Wakefulness and for Hypocretin-Induced Arousal in Zebrafish Chanpreet Singh†, Grigorios Oikonomou†, David a Prober*
    RESEARCH ARTICLE elifesciences.org Norepinephrine is required to promote wakefulness and for hypocretin-induced arousal in zebrafish Chanpreet Singh†, Grigorios Oikonomou†, David A Prober* Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States Abstract Pharmacological studies in mammals suggest that norepinephrine (NE) plays an important role in promoting arousal. However, the role of endogenous NE is unclear, with contradicting reports concerning the sleep phenotypes of mice lacking NE due to mutation of dopamine β-hydroxylase (dbh). To investigate NE function in an alternative vertebrate model, we generated dbh mutant zebrafish. In contrast to mice, these animals exhibit dramatically increased sleep. Surprisingly, despite an increase in sleep, dbh mutant zebrafish have a reduced arousal threshold. These phenotypes are also observed in zebrafish treated with small molecules that inhibit NE signaling, suggesting that they are caused by the lack of NE. Using genetic overexpression of hypocretin (Hcrt) and optogenetic activation of hcrt-expressing neurons, we also find that NE is important for Hcrt-induced arousal. These results establish a role for endogenous NE in promoting arousal and indicate that NE is a critical downstream effector of Hcrt neurons. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.07000.001 *For correspondence: dprober@ Introduction caltech.edu Sleep remains among the most persistent and perplexing mysteries in modern biology. Several †These authors contributed studies have shown that neuronal centers that regulate sleep and wakefulness lie predominantly in the equally to this work hypothalamus and brainstem (Pace-Schott and Hobson, 2002; Saper et al., 2005), and many of the neurotransmitters and neuropeptides employed by these centers are known.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacology 101
    Pharmacology 101 Tyler Fischback, PharmD, BCPS, DPLA Clinical Pharmacy Manager Confluence Health Wenatchee, WA Objectives • Define Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics • Understand how drug interactions work • Understand how some specific drugs behave in the body (opioids, benzodiazepines, amiodarone) • Apply pharmacology principles into practice Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events • Error: An error of commission or omission at any step along the pathway that begins when a clinician prescribes a medication and ends when the patient actually received the medication. • ADE: Harm experienced by a patient as a result of exposure to a medication. ADE does not necessarily indicate an error or poor care. However, ~1/2 of ADEs are preventable. Anyone here ever seen a medication error or adverse drug event? Anyone here ever made a medication error? How many different prescription medications are available on the U.S. market? 1,000 So, it’s no surprise why we see so many problems………………… EXCEPT……. The real number is 10,000 Adverse Drug Events • ~1/3 of U.S. adults use 5 or more medications • Annually, ADE = 700,000 ER visits and 100,000 hospitalizations • So, is pharmacology important to your work? • Additionally, 5% of hospitalized patient experience an ADE during their stay • High risk: Anticoagulants, Opioids, Insulin, Cardiac, and Transitions of Care Adverse Drug Events, cont. • Elderly are more susceptible • Pediatrics patients more susceptible (weight-based dosing), especially liquids • Caregivers and patients admittedly
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of the Sympathetic Nervous System with Other Pressor Systems in Antihypertensive Therapy
    Journal of Clinical and Basic Cardiology An Independent International Scientific Journal Journal of Clinical and Basic Cardiology 2001; 4 (3), 185-192 Interaction of the Sympathetic Nervous System with other Pressor Systems in Antihypertensive Therapy Wenzel RR, Baumgart D, Bruck H, Erbel R, Heemann U Mitchell A, Philipp Th, Schaefers RF Homepage: www.kup.at/jcbc Online Data Base Search for Authors and Keywords Indexed in Chemical Abstracts EMBASE/Excerpta Medica Krause & Pachernegg GmbH · VERLAG für MEDIZIN und WIRTSCHAFT · A-3003 Gablitz/Austria FOCUS ON SYMPATHETIC TONE Interaction of SNS J Clin Basic Cardiol 2001; 4: 185 Interaction of the Sympathetic Nervous System with Other Pressor Systems in Antihypertensive Therapy R. R. Wenzel1, H. Bruck1, A. Mitchell1, R. F. Schaefers1, D. Baumgart2, R. Erbel2, U. Heemann1, Th. Philipp1 Regulation of blood pressure homeostasis and cardiac function is importantly regulated by the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and other pressor systems including the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the vascular endothelium. Increases in SNS activity increase mortality in patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure. This review summarizes some of the interactions between the main pressor systems, ie, the SNS, the RAS and the vascular endothelium including the endothelin-system. Different classes of cardiovascular drugs interfere differently with the SNS and the other pressor systems. Beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors and diuretics have no major effect on central SNS activity. Pure vasodilators including nitrates, alpha-blockers and DHP-calcium channel blockers increase SNS activity. In contrast, central sympatholytic drugs including moxonidine re- duce SNS activity. The effects of angiotensin-II receptor antagonist on SNS activity in humans are not clear, experimental data are discussed in this review.
    [Show full text]
  • Ehealth DSI [Ehdsi V2.2.2-OR] Ehealth DSI – Master Value Set
    MTC eHealth DSI [eHDSI v2.2.2-OR] eHealth DSI – Master Value Set Catalogue Responsible : eHDSI Solution Provider PublishDate : Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 1 of 490 MTC Table of Contents epSOSActiveIngredient 4 epSOSAdministrativeGender 148 epSOSAdverseEventType 149 epSOSAllergenNoDrugs 150 epSOSBloodGroup 155 epSOSBloodPressure 156 epSOSCodeNoMedication 157 epSOSCodeProb 158 epSOSConfidentiality 159 epSOSCountry 160 epSOSDisplayLabel 167 epSOSDocumentCode 170 epSOSDoseForm 171 epSOSHealthcareProfessionalRoles 184 epSOSIllnessesandDisorders 186 epSOSLanguage 448 epSOSMedicalDevices 458 epSOSNullFavor 461 epSOSPackage 462 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 2 of 490 MTC epSOSPersonalRelationship 464 epSOSPregnancyInformation 466 epSOSProcedures 467 epSOSReactionAllergy 470 epSOSResolutionOutcome 472 epSOSRoleClass 473 epSOSRouteofAdministration 474 epSOSSections 477 epSOSSeverity 478 epSOSSocialHistory 479 epSOSStatusCode 480 epSOSSubstitutionCode 481 epSOSTelecomAddress 482 epSOSTimingEvent 483 epSOSUnits 484 epSOSUnknownInformation 487 epSOSVaccine 488 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 3 of 490 MTC epSOSActiveIngredient epSOSActiveIngredient Value Set ID 1.3.6.1.4.1.12559.11.10.1.3.1.42.24 TRANSLATIONS Code System ID Code System Version Concept Code Description (FSN) 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01 A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01
    [Show full text]