DOCSLIB.ORG

IN the CIRCUIT COURT of the TWELTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS MICHAEL MARCONI, Et Al., Plaintiffs, V. CITY of JOLIET

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IN the CIRCUIT COURT of the TWELTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS MICHAEL MARCONI, Et Al., Plaintiffs, V. CITY of JOLIET Andrea Lynn Chasteen Will County Circuit Clerk Twelfth Judicial Circuit Court Electronically Filed 10MR165 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELTH JUDICIAL CIRCUITFiled Date: 4/20/2018 5:54 PM WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS Envelope: 924092 Clerk: KA MICHAEL MARCONI, et al., ) ) No. 10 MR 0165 Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF JOLIET, a municipal corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND INCENTIVE AWARDS Plaintiffs Michael Marconi and David Connor (“Plaintiffs”) respectfully move this Honorable Court for an order awarding attorney’s fees and incentive awards, stating in support as follows: Introduction After years of hard-fought litigation, Plaintiffs achieved an excellent settlement that ensures all class members will have affordable health insurance for the rest of their lives, while also providing for substantial refunds for alleged overpayments of past healthcare costs. In this case, Plaintiffs alleged that Joliet has long promised its employees certain benefits, including healthcare benefits that carry over into retirement, and that Joliet violated the Illinois Constitution and breached various collective bargaining agreements when it increased the costs of those benefits without the retirees’ permission in 2010. The settlement creates a common fund (“Settlement Fund”) of $702,139.99, which Class Counsel anticipates will result in each Class Member receiving more than $1,570. The settlement also provides injunctive relief, guaranteeing that the cost of Class Members’ healthcare deductibles and prescription drug copays will remain at their current levels and will never increase. Importantly, Class Members do not need to do anything to receive the settlement benefits. The settlement was the result of years of adversarial litigation, as well as arms-length negotiations, and provides class members with both a substantial cash payment and certainty with respect to future costs for deductibles and prescription drug copays. I. SUMMARY OF LITIGATION AND SETTLEMENT. A. The Litigation Plaintiffs filed this case in 2010, seeking redress for Joliet’s decision to reduce their retirement benefits without consent. Plaintiffs’ initial complaint alleged that Joliet’s unilateral reduction in their retirement benefits violated the Illinois Constitution, as well as the Collective Bargaining Agreements (“Contracts”) that governed the terms and conditions of their employment. This Court agreed with Plaintiffs, holding that Joliet violated the Illinois Constitution. The Court granted summary judgment for Plaintiffs and entered a Final Order on November 2, 2011. See Final Judgment entered on November 2, 2011. The Illinois Appellate Court, Third District, reversed and remanded for further fact finding. Specifically, the Appellate Court held: Before deciding this case under the pension protection clause of the Illinois Constitution, the circuit court should have first determined whether it could be decided on nonconstitutional grounds. The contractual issue discussed above must be considered before any constitutional issues may be decided. Thus, pursuant to the constitutional avoidance doctrine and Supreme Court Rule 366(a)(5), we reverse and remand so that the circuit court may take additional evidence and determine whether each plaintiff has a vested right to receive the specific health care benefits promised in the collective bargaining agreement under which he retired. After considering all of the evidence relevant to this question, the court shall apply a presumption in favor of vesting as described in the foregoing opinion unless: (1) the language of the collective bargaining agreements unambiguously shows that the parties did not intend the benefits to vest; or (2) if the contract language is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence suggests that the parties did not intend the benefits to vest. Only if the circuit court finds no vested contractual rights should it address whether the benefits at issue are protected under the pension protection clause. Marconi v. City of Joliet, 2013 IL App (3d) 110865, ¶ 45, 989 N.E.2d 722, 737 (3d Dist. 2013). After the Illinois Supreme Court denied Joliet’s request for leave to appeal, the mandate issued on November 10, 2014. On remand, Plaintiffs moved to certify this case as a class action, 2 and accordingly amended their complaint to include class allegations, ensuring the fact finding described by the Third District Appellate Court would apply equally to all Joliet retirees. The Court certified the case as a class action, and subsequently amended the class definition, so that the following two subclasses are certified: (a) one subclass covers individuals “who retired before January 1, 2010 as bargaining unit employees whose retiree health care benefits were subject to collective bargaining agreements and whose health care benefits were reduced in any way after their retirement”; and (b) one subclass covers “former City of Joliet employees who retired before January 1, 2010 and whose retiree health care benefits were reduced in any way after their retirement.” (Order on 5/18/2016 at 2.) The parties subsequently completed a substantial amount of discovery. See Affidavit of Scott Rauscher (“Rauscher Aff.”). In particular, the parties served and responded to eight separate sets of written discovery, produced more than 6,000 pages of documents, and conducted six depositions. Rauscher Aff. ¶ 35. Following discovery, the parties both filed motions for summary judgment, asking the Court to resolve all liability issues short of trial. Rauscher Aff. ¶ 35. While those motions were pending, the parties began discussing a possible resolution of the case. Rauscher Aff. ¶ 39. After extensive negotiations, including an in-person negotiation with client representatives present (including Mr. Conner and Mr. Marconi), as well as numerous written and telephonic discussions, the parties were able to reach a settlement that provides valuable relief to the Class Members. Rauscher Aff. ¶ 39-43. II. The Settlement Provides Valuable Benefits to the Class Joliet has agreed to create a Settlement Fund of $702,139.99, which represents a refund of approximately 48% of the alleged overcharges for healthcare premiums and prescription drug 3 copays. Rauscher Aff. at Ex. 2 (Settlement Agreement). Each Class Member will receive an equal share of the Settlement Fund and, as described in the motion for preliminary approval, all but three Class Members will receive their share of the Settlement Fund without taking any action on their part. Id.1 Class Counsel estimates that Class Members will receive more than $1,570 each through this settlement, with checks automatically mailed to them. Rauscher Aff. ¶ 45. In addition to the monetary payments described above, Joliet has agreed to injunctive relief. Namely, Joliet has agreed that it will never increase the healthcare deductible or prescription drug copay for any Class Member. Rauscher Aff. at Ex. 2 (Settlement Agreement). In addition, it has agreed to freeze the premium for retiree dependent care coverage at the current level through at least the end of 2030. Id. This is an additional benefit for Class Members beyond their allegations in the Complaint: unlike with the deductibles and prescription drug copays that Joliet increased in 2010, Joliet had not increased the dependent care premiums. Rauscher Aff. ¶ 43. The Settlement Agreement ensures that Joliet will not do so for at least another twelve years, and it reserves Class Members’ rights to challenge any dependent premium increase after 2030. Rauscher Aff. at Ex. 2 (Settlement Agreement). III. Class Counsel’s Fee Request Is Reasonable. Based on the settlement, Class Counsel requests $234,000 in fees and expenses, representing one-third of the common fund. As described below, given the excellent result 1 As noted in the Settlement Agreement, Joliet’s records indicate that three Class Members have not paid anything for healthcare coverage from Joliet since 2010. Therefore, those three Class Members have necessarily not overpaid for healthcare coverage from Joliet. Because they have not paid anything, they will not receive payment from the Settlement Fund, unless they provide proof within thirty days of the Class Notice being sent that they have paid for such benefits. Class Counsel will include a letter with those three Class Members’ notices informing them of these facts. 4 achieved in this case, Class Counsel’s request is reasonable. So too is the request for $10,000 incentive awards for both of the Named Plaintiffs. Mr. Conner and Mr. Marconi were actively involved throughout this litigation, including spending thousands of dollars out of pocket to pay previous counsel, before current Class Counsel agreed to take this case on a contingency basis. A. The Court should award Class Counsel a percentage of the common fund. Class Counsel created a common fund for Joliet retirees, and the law provides for fees and expenses to be reimbursed from that fund. Under the common fund doctrine, “a litigant or lawyer who recovers a common fund for the benefit of persons other than himself or his clients is entitled to a reasonable attorney’s fee from the fund as a whole.” Wendling v. S. Ill. Hosp. Servs., 242 Ill. 2d 261, 265 (2011) (internal quotations omitted). The common fund doctrine “is founded on the rationale that successful litigants would be unjustly enriched if their attorneys were not compensated from the common fund created for the litigants’ benefit.” Brundidge v. Glendale Fed. Bank F.S.B., 168 Ill. 2d 235, 238 (1995). “By
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SPRING 2020, Vol. 34, Issue 1 SPRING 2020 1
    SPRING 2020, Vol. 34, Issue 1 SPRING 2020 1 MISSION NAWJ’s mission is to promote the judicial role of protecting the rights of individuals under the rule of law through strong, committed, diverse judicial leadership; fairness and equality in the courts; and ON THE COVER 19 Channeling Sugar equal access to justice. Innovative Efforts to Improve Access to Justice through Global Judicial Leadership 21 Learning Lessons from Midyear Meeting in New Orleans addresses Tough Cases BOARD OF DIRECTORS ongoing challenges facing access to justice. Story on page 14 24 Life After the Bench: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Honorable Sharon Mettler PRESIDENT 2 President's Message Hon. Bernadette D'Souza 26 Trial Advocacy Training for Parish of Orleans Civil District Court, Louisiana 2 Interim Executive Director's Women by Women Message PRESIDENT-ELECT 29 District News Hon. Karen Donohue 3 VP of Publications Message King County Superior Court, Seattle, Washington 51 District Directors & Committees 4 Q&A with Judge Ann Breen-Greco VICE PRESIDENT, DISTRICTS Co-Chair Human Trafficking 52 Sponsors Hon. Elizabeth A. White Committee Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County 54 New Members 5 Independent Immigration Courts VICE PRESIDENT, PUBLICATIONS Hon. Heidi Pasichow 7 Resource Board Profile Superior Court of the District of Columbia Cathy Winter-Palmer SECRETARY Hon. Orlinda Naranjo (ret.) 8 Global Judicial Leadership 419th District Court of Texas, Austin Doing the Impossible: NAWJ work with the Pan-American TREASURER Commission of Judges on Social Hon. Elizabeth K. Lee Rights Superior Court of California, San Mateo County IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT 11 Global Judicial Leadership Hon. Tamila E.
    [Show full text]
  • Circuit Circuit
    December 2019 Featured In This Issue In Memoriam Randall Crocker, By Jeffrey Cole An Interview with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, By Hon. Elaine Bucklo TheThe A Historic Chief, By Steven J. Dollear An Interview with Judge Charles P. Kocoras, Editor’s Note By Jeffrey Cole A Life Well Lived: An Interview with Justice John Paul Stevens, By Jeffrey Cole and Elaine E. Bucklo CirCircuitcuit Appeals: The Classic Guide, By William Pannill John Paul Stevens: A True Gentleman of Justice, By Rachael D. Wilson Reversing the Magistrate Judge, By Jeffrey Cole Answering the Call, part 2: The Northern District of Illinois’ Rockford Bankruptcy Help Desk, By Laura McNally RiderRiderT HE J OURNALOFTHE S EVENTH In Recognition of Barbara Crabb, Comments By Diane P. Wood C IRCUITIRCUIT B AR A SSOCIATION Around the Circuit, By Collins T. Fitzpatrick J u d g e s The Circuit Rider In This Issue Letter from the President . 1 In Memoriam Randall Crocker, By Jeffrey Cole . 2 An Interview with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, By Hon. Elaine Bucklo . 3-12 A Historic Chief, By Steven J. Dollear . .13-15 An Interview with Judge Charles P. Kocoras, Editor’s Note By Jeffrey Cole . .16-28 A Life Well Lived: An Interview with Justice John Paul Stevens, By Jeffrey Cole and Elaine E. Bucklo . 29-38 Appeals: The Classic Guide, By William Pannill . .39-48 John Paul Stevens: A True Gentleman of Justice, By Rachael D. Wilson . 49-51 Reversing the Magistrate Judge, By Jeffrey Cole . 52-59 Answering the Call, part 2: The Northern District of Illinois’ Rockford Bankruptcy Help Desk, By Laura McNally .
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Supreme Court Preview: Biographies of 2020 Supreme Court Preview Panelists
    William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Supreme Court Preview Conferences, Events, and Lectures 9-11-2020 2020-2021 Supreme Court Preview: Biographies of 2020 Supreme Court Preview Panelists Institute of Bill of Rights Law at The College of William & Mary Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview Part of the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Repository Citation Institute of Bill of Rights Law at The College of William & Mary Law School, "2020-2021 Supreme Court Preview: Biographies of 2020 Supreme Court Preview Panelists" (2020). Supreme Court Preview. 295. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview/295 Copyright c 2020 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview Biographies of 2020 Supreme Court Preview Panelists law.wm.edu/academics/intellectuallife/researchcenters/ibrl/scp/2020/notebook/bios/index.php ROBERT BARNES - Washington Post Robert Barnes has spent most of his career at The Washington Post, as a reporter and editor. He joined the paper to cover politics in 1987, and has covered campaigns at the presidential, congressional and gubernatorial level. He served in various editing positions, including metropolitan editor, deputy national editor in charge of domestic issues and the Supreme Court, and national political editor. He returned to reporting to cover the Supreme Court in November 2006, and has done so since then, with a brief break to cover the conclusion of the 2008 presidential campaign. He covered the Supreme Court nominations of Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.
    [Show full text]
  • Franita Tolson
    FRANITA TOLSON Professor of Law Vice Dean for Faculty and Academic Affairs University of Southern California Gould School of Law Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071 [email protected] · 213-740-7683 ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GOULD SCHOOL OF LAW Los Angeles, CA Vice Dean for Faculty and Academic Affairs July 2019-Present Professor of Law June 2017-Present Visiting Professor of Law February 2016 Courses: Constitutional Law I & II; Election Law; Electing A President (undergraduate course) Service: Co-Chair, Race and the Law Academic Affairs Subcommittee (2020-Present); Faculty Advisor – Southeast Asian Law Students Association (2019-Present); Academic Affairs (2018- 2019); Admissions (2018-2019); Appointments (2017-2018); Experiential Readiness Committee (2017-2018) Reviewer: NYU PRESS; ELECTION LAW JOURNAL; PUBLIUS; CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS; ROUTLEDGE Podcast: Co-Host, Free and Fair with Franita and Foley THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL Chicago, IL Visiting Professor of Law forthcoming Spring 2021 FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW Tallahassee, FL Betty T. Ferguson Professor of Voting Rights 2012 – 2017 Associate Professor (with tenure) 2014 – 2017 Assistant Professor 2009 – 2014 Courses: Constitutional Law II; Election Law; Employment Discrimination; First Amendment; Legislation and Regulation; Race and the Law. Committees: Appointments (2016-2017 (Chair), 2014-2015, 2012-2013); Member, FSU Provost Search Committee (2015); Faculty Enrichment (2014-2015 (Chair), 2010-2011); Faculty Senate (2010-2015); Admissions (2016-2017, 2013-2014); Judicial Clerkships (2009-2012). Honors/Awards: Nominee, FSU University Teaching Award (2016, 2014); Summer Research Grant Recipient (Summer 2009, 2011- 2016); First Year Assistant Professor Research Grant Recipient (Summer 2010). Symposium (organizer): “The Law of Democracy at a Crossroads: Reflecting on Fifty Years of Voting Rights and the Judicial Regulation of the Political Thicket” (March 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Case: 1:12-Cv-04069 Document #: 533 Filed: 01/10/17 Page 1 of 40 Pageid #:12583
    Case: 1:12-cv-04069 Document #: 533 Filed: 01/10/17 Page 1 of 40 PageID #:12583 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION GERARDO ARANDA, GRANT BIRCHMEIER, STEPHEN PARKES, and Case No. 1:12-cv-04069 REGINA STONE, on behalf of themselves and a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly v. CARIBBEAN CRUISE LINE, INC., ECONOMIC STRATEGY GROUP, ECONOMIC STRATEGY GROUP, INC., ECONOMIC STRATEGY, LLC, THE BERKLEY GROUP, INC., and VACATION OWNERSHIP MARKETING TOURS, INC., Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES, AND INCENTIVE AWARDS Case: 1:12-cv-04069 Document #: 533 Filed: 01/10/17 Page 2 of 40 PageID #:12584 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 II. Background .......................................................................................................................... 2 A. Nature of Case .......................................................................................................... 2 B. Litigation History .................................................................................................... 3 C. Class Counsel’s Continuing Efforts Since Preliminary Approval ...................... 8 III. Class Counsel’s Requested Attorneys’ Fee and Expense Award Is Reasonable, Falls Within the Market Rate for Similar Services, and Should be Approved .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Student Educator
    www.coe.wayne.edu THIS ISSUE ALSO INCLUDES … The Student Educator Information for College of Education Students, Prospective Students and Alumni an annual publication of the WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION and COE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION www.coe.wayne.edu PUBLISHED FEBRUARY, 2011 Administrative Changes in 2010 at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, has been appointed the next Dean of the College of Education. In his written statement he indicated ALMANAC... that Dr. Shields has “the necessary experience and leadership skills to make certain that the College of The Deanery of the College Education prospers during these difficult times in higher of Education: 1881-2010 education.” The Provost also expressed his “sincere appreciation to Interim Dean Steve Ilmer for his superb ince the founding of the College of Education as leadership during this interim period.” Further, the the Detroit Normal Training Class for Teachers Board of Governors on January 19, 2011 appointed Sin 1881 to the present day, eighteen individuals Allan Gilmour as the 11th president of Wayne State have held the head position as principal or dean, in University, removing the “interim” from his title. an interim or permanent capacity. Paula C. Wood, Ph.D., who retired from the deanship in August 2010 Steven Ilmer Named Interim Dean to return to faculty status, is the college’s second Steven Ilmer, Ph.D., who has served as Associate Dean longest-tenured dean, having spent nearly 20 years of Research in the College of Education since 1991, was in that role. Only Dean Waldo Lessenger (1931-1955) appointed by Provost Barrett, before she stepped down served as dean longer than Dean Wood.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catalyst That Opened Courthouse Doors for Women on the Federal Bench
    THE NINETEENTH AMENDMENT: THE CATALYST THAT OPENED COURTHOUSE DOORS FOR WOMEN ON THE FEDERAL BENCH JUDGE ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS (RET.)† I was incredibly honored and blessed to serve as a federal judge for nearly thirty-three years, first on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and next on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The 100th anniversary of the Nineteenth Amendment is especially meaningful to me because it not only opened the voting booth to women, it opened the courthouse doors for women to become federal judges. No woman had served as a federal judge prior to the Nineteenth Amendment. Indeed, few women judges sat on any court before it was ratified. No woman had been elected judge before the Nineteenth Amendment passed, and there were certainly no Article III lifetime, presidentially appointed women federal judges. The Nineteenth Amendment changed that. As Judge Florence E. Allen later reflected, “With the winning of the vote women gained the right . to assume their part in public and professional life.”1 Allen embraced that right in full. In 1906, thirteen years before the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, Allen was the music critic for the Cleveland Plain Dealer and a teacher at a school for girls.2 Never one to be idle, she also took graduate courses and obtained a Master of Arts degree in Political Science.3 A professor asked her, “Why don’t you study law?”, which she said “came like Copyright © 2020 Judge Ann Claire Williams. Edited by the Cornell Law Review.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Judges Association in the 20Th Century
    Judges Act to urgamze . • I Carole Hicke Fo·r Salaries, Benefits I {_;; b~fl.J" :tJqen-. • ·~. tit\eo -'"'ii1q_ n ,,r ~ . re en , -0 ~ es"' . lq.!Se'° .... Judg: ' • M,E'l Shockinr1 r, ~ ~ , ,\).' Of Fede/ reafrnent ~ t'3-\. J THE FEDERAL JUDGES of Judges # ~e&.e ,.. ,\ \. d •• Want Lobby \,'-.,'li~ ._,"(\U'. "'".-:;.. .,.,..·~~~.. ,,,..,. ASSOCIATION <>:'.\.~ ~ ~. Prc posa. l l: ~ \)~o..e\. ~e~·-~~~;~~~t~\~ a~uA~ainst I N T H E . '-'" 0 c; ~~ o ~e'(\ \~v~.,_~ ~~ ~~~e~ \).>" ~ e"e <jiP_V \'!\ \e~e:_.,~())11 w- ~ \'(\ \ \'(\ \ o;,'\. C...~"'\.' <!»-~~~ 7>';)0~ $'0>"'e~ ~~.._.. .._.. TWENTIETH '7 CoNGt. o~e!o;,.\ "-~ \'(\q, "-r #\'f:ss Uf<c 1 FJA ;wyers Forming Citizens f.:D 1· CENTURY ;roup to Push Congress OJfelp Federal Judges Nee~ s . Deserved Pay Raise • JIJdges q111t OVer Salary eS J·uc\9 n" y_e fof MORE PAy SOUGH1 COPYRIGHT © 2000 BY THE FEDERAL JUDGES ASSOCIATION ~o.'1 · f-\ eo .;\\s-t.' FOR V.s . .JlTnr"-r,tn Contents Foreword by Spencer Williams vi Acknowledgments ix 1. The Decline of the Dollar 1 2. Litigation 5 3. Ninth Circuit Committee on Judicial Salaries and Benefits 13 4. Two Objectives 17 5. The Federal Judges Association is Formed 23 6. A Decade of Achievement: 1982-1992 29 7. Next On the Agenda: Issues, Deliberations, Solutions 35 8. Administrative Matters 39 9. Communication and Connection 43 10. Circling the Wagons 49 Appendix 1. Honor Roll of Past Plaintiffs 55 Appendix 2. Federal Judges Association Constitution 57 Notes 59 Foreword It is the true office of histo1y to represent the events themselves, e together with the counsels, and to leave the obse1vations and conclusions thereupon to the liberty he Federal Judges Association has completed and fa wlty of eve1yman's judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid to the Historymakers ® Video Oral History with the Honorable Ann Claire Williams
    Finding Aid to The HistoryMakers ® Video Oral History with The Honorable Ann Claire Williams Finding Aid to The HistoryMakers ® Video Oral History with The Honorable Ann Claire Williams Overview of the Collection Repository: The HistoryMakers®1900 S. Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60616 [email protected] www.thehistorymakers.com Creator: Williams, Ann Claire, 1949- Title: The HistoryMakers® Video Oral History Interview with The Honorable Ann Claire Williams, Dates: June 20, 2000 Bulk Dates: 2000 Physical Description: 5 Betacame SP videocasettes (2:35:04). Abstract: Federal judge The Honorable Ann Claire Williams (1949 - ) was the first African American appointed to serve on any federal appeals court. Williams was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1999. Previously, Williams was appointed by President Ronald Reagan to the Federal District Court in Illinois in 1985. Williams was interviewed by The HistoryMakers® on June 20, 2000, in Chicago, Illinois. This collection is comprised of the original video footage of the interview. Identification: A2000_042 Language: The interview and records are in English. Biographical Note by The HistoryMakers® Judge Ann Williams was born in Detroit on August 16, 1949, the oldest of three daughters born to Dorothy and Joshua Williams. Williams graduated from Wayne State University in 1970 with a degree in elementary education and then got a masters degree from the University of Michigan in guidance and counseling. She then taught third grade in Detroit until she went to the University of Notre Dame, where she received her law degree in 1976. William began her legal career as a law clerk with Judge Robert Sprecher of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hon. Ann Claire Williams U.S
    Published May 2006 Judicial Profile MARK G. KOBASUK Hon. Ann Claire Williams U.S. Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit AS THE FIRST African-American woman appointed as a U.S. district judge in Illi- nois and the first African-American ap- pointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Judge Ann Claire Williams has been a trailblazer in the legal field, serving with distinction as a federal judge for more than 20 years. As the daughter of a bus driver from Detroit, she has worked tirelessly to mentor others and to make the road easier for those who follow her. Judge Williams graduated from Wayne State Uni- versity in Detroit and began her professional career as a music teacher and a third-grade teacher in an she had become the supervisor of criminal litigation inner-city school in her native Detroit. While working in the office. From 1980 to 1983, she served as deputy full time, she commuted to the University of Michigan chief of the criminal receiving and appellate division. in Ann Arbor and earned a master’s degree in educa- Dan K. Webb, the U.S. attorney at the time and now tion. As she was completing her studies, a friend who a well-known trial lawyer at Winston & Strawn LLP was applying to law school convinced Judge Williams in Chicago, has described Judge Williams as “authori- to do the same. Ann Claire Williams settled on a ca- tative but not irritating” and as someone who could reer in the law as a way to teach and work for social mesmerize a jury.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Journey of Black Women to the Nation's Highest Courts
    Black Women Judges: The Historical Journey of Black Women to the Nation’s Highest Courts THE H ON . A NNA B LACKBURNE -R IGSBY * INTRODUCTION . 646 I. BENEFITS TO HAVING A DIVERSE APPELLATE JUDICIARY . 649 II. PLACING THE FIRST BLACK MALE JUDGES AND FIRST WHITE WOMEN JUDGES INTO HISTORICAL CONTEXT . 652 A. Reconstruction: 1865-1877 . 653 B. End of Reconstruction: 1877 . 654 C. The Women’s Suffrage Movement: 1800-1920. 655 D. World War I: 1914-1918 (America entered the war in 1917) . 656 E. Great Migration: 1910-1930 . 657 F. World War II: 1939-1945 (America entered the war in 1941) . 658 * The Hon. Anna Blackburne-Rigsby is an Associate Judge on the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. She was nominated to the court by President George W. Bush in 2006. Prior to that, she served for six years on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, nominated in 2000 by President William Jefferson Clinton. Prior to that appointment, she served for five years as a Magistrate Judge on the District of Columbia Superior Court. Judge Blackburne-Rigsby is married to Judge Robert R. Rigsby, Associate Judge of the District of Columbia Superior Court and a Colonel and Military Judge in the United States Army Reserves. They have one son, Julian. Judge Blackburne-Rigsby is the daughter of Justice Laura D. Blackburne, retired, New York State Supreme Court. Judge Blackburne-Rigsby acknowledges with gratitude the assistance of her research assis- tant, Precious Boone, Esq., a graduate of Cornell Law School. Judge Blackburne-Rigsby also acknowledges the assistance of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Circuit Circuit Rider
    November 2017 Featured In This Issue Milton Shadur: The Consummate Judge, By Hon. Robert Gettleman Mandatory Initial Discovery: Just, Speedy, and Inexpensive or Nasty, Brutish, and Short?, By Daniel R. Fine Operation Greylord: Corruption in the Cook County Courts, By Terrence Hake TheThe Who, Me, Unreasonable? Establishing “Reasonableness” of Defense Counsel Fees in Insurance Coverage Litigation in the 7th Circuit, By Jesse Bair Supreme Court Limits Use of Settlements to Skip Priority Creditors in Bankruptcy, By David Christian When Unpopular Opinions Meet Politics: Three Milwaukee Federal Judges Who Faced Impeachment CirCircuitcuit Investigations, By Barbara Fritschel Book Review, By Joseph Ferguson, PUBLIC CORRUPTION AND THE LAW: Cases and Materials, by David H. Hoffman and Juliet S. Sorensen TRIBUTES: Judge John W. Darrah, By Jim Dvorak RiderRiderT HE J OURNALOFTHE S EVENTH Judge Larry J. McKinney, By Hon. Tim A. Baker C IRCUITIRCUIT B AR A SSOCIATION Judge Denise K. LaRue, By Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt T h e T i m e s T h e y Are aCh a n g i n ’ The Circuit Rider In This Issue Letter from the President . 1 Judge Richard A. Posner Announcement . 2 Milton Shadur: The Consummate Judge, By Hon. Robert Gettleman . 3-8 Mandatory Initial Discovery: Just, Speedy, and Inexpensive or Nasty, Brutish, and Short?, By Daniel R. Fine . 9-12 Operation Greylord: Corruption in the Cook County Courts, By Terrence Hake . 13-17 Who, Me, Unreasonable? Establishing “Reasonableness” of Defense Counsel Fees in Insurance Coverage Litigation in the 7th Circuit, By Jesse Bair . 18-22 Supreme Court Limits Use of Settlements to Skip Priority Creditors in Bankruptcy, By David Christian .
    [Show full text]