Circuit-Rider-Vol-25.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Circuit-Rider-Vol-25.Pdf November 2018 Featured In This Issue Steve Shapiro’s Legacy in the Courtroom and Beyond, By Kathy Agonis In Memoriam Stephen Shapiro, By Jeffrey Cole TheThe An Interview With Steve Shapiro: The Art of Appellate Advocacy, By Jeffrey Cole In Memoriam: A Tribute to Judge Daniel G. Martin, By Hon. Sara Ellis Hugo Black and the Murder of Father James E. Coyle, By Kenneth P. Nolan CirCircuitcuit Emojis, Emoticons, and the Law: An Overview for Attorneys and Judges, By Alexandra L. Newman The Path To Trial: A Nuts And Bolts Roadmap To Federal Civil Pretrial Submissions, By Skyler Silvertrust Answering the Call: Pro Bono Programs in the Courts of the Seventh Circuit, By Laura McNally & Margot Klein Diversity Jurisdiction and the Citizenship of Insurers, By Jeff Bowen RiderRiderT HE J OURNALOFTHE S EVENTH A Brief Note To Mark the 50th Anniversary of Multidistrict Litigation, By Jane Dall Wilson C IRCUITIRCUIT B AR A SSOCIATION Book Review, By Dawson Robinson, WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT, by Jeffrey Rosen Around the Circuit, By Collins T. Fitzpatrick Me m o r i e s The Circuit Rider In This Issue Letter from the President . 1 Steve Shapiro’s Legacy in the Courtroom and Beyond, By Kathy Agonis . .2-7 In Memoriam Stephen Shapiro, By Jeffrey Cole . .8-9 An Interview With Steve Shapiro: The Art of Appellate Advocacy, By Jeffrey Cole . 10-19 In Memoriam: A Tribute to Judge Daniel G. Martin, By Hon. Sara Ellis . .20-22 Hugo Black and the Murder of Father James E. Coyle, By Kenneth P. Nolan . .23-25 Emojis, Emoticons, and the Law: An Overview for Attorneys and Judges, By Alexandra L. Newman . 26-34 The Path To Trial: A Nuts And Bolts Roadmap To Federal Civil Pretrial Submissions, By Skyler Silvertrust . 35-39 Answering the Call: Pro Bono Programs in the Courts of the Seventh Circuit, By Laura McNally & Margot Klein . 40-44 Diversity Jurisdiction and the Citizenship of Insurers, By Jeff Bowen . 44-48 A Brief Note To Mark the 50th Anniversary of Multidistrict Litigation, By Jane Dall Wilson . .49-51 Book Review, By Dawson Robinson, WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT, by Jeffrey Rosen . 52-55 Around the Circuit, By Collins T. Fitzpatrick . .56-57 Get Involved. .1 Writers Wanted! . .34 Send Us Your E-Mail. .44 Upcoming Board of Governors’ Meetings . 55 Seventh Circuit Bar Association Officers for 2017-2018 / Board of Governors / Editorial Board. .58 The Circuit Rider 1 membership, and we work to generate sufficient revenue to Letter from the P r e s i d e n t serve our mission. President Randall D. Crocker von Briesen & Roper, s.c. The Board of Governors is reviewing our bylaws, and we will update these bylaws as appropriate to reflect our vision for the organization. Our treasurer, Howard Adelman, reports that our finances are in good order and that our reserves are in a prudent amount. Welcome to another edition of the The Circuit Rider, the first rate publication We have four new judges confirmed to the 7th Circuit Court of of the 7th Circuit Bar Association. I want Appeals this year. Among the Association’s traditional services to thank Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole, is our gift to the Circuit of the official portrait of each of our the editorial board, and the contributing Circuit Judges. The portraits of Judges Barret, Brennan, Scudder authors for yet another thought-provoking and excellent edition. and St. Eve are being painted as I write this, and will be ready This publication is a valuable tool for those of us who practice for presentation at our annual meeting in May. in the 7th Circuit, and is one of many things that make our organization so worthwhile. Plans for our annual meeting are in progress with a committed and dynamic planning committee. We will gather in Milwaukee Thanks to Past President Elizabeth Herrington for her leadership at the Pfister Hotel from May 5 to the 7th for the 68th Judicial of our organization over the past year and for an outstanding Conference and Annual Meeting of the 7th Circuit Bar Association. conference in Chicago last May. Our conference was well attended with outstanding representation from the bench and Under the leadership of Mike Brody, our Foundation continues bar from our three states. The topics were timely and the to present superb programs on important subjects. programs well attended and received. The Annual Dinner was a great success. I am honored to serve the Association as its president at this exciting time, and I am looking forward to a great year. At the March 2018 meeting of the Board of Governors, Beth Herrington and Steve Molo presented an updated version of Thanks for your support. the Association’s Vision and Mission Statement. The Board unanimously approved it. Our vision is to advocate for the fair and effective administration of justice in the Courts of the Seventh Circuit, and our mission Get Involved! is to promote interaction and cooperation between lawyers and judges in improving the administration of justice. Interested in becoming more involved in the Association? Get involved with a committee! Log on to our web site at We plan to accomplish these goals by working with the Courts in www.7thcircuitbar.org, and click on the “committees” planning and conducting the Judicial Conferences and Annual link. Choose a committee that looks interesting, and Meetings of the 7th Circuit Bar Association. We seek to diversify contact the chair for more information. and to strengthen educational and other programs across the Circuit. We strive to promote and enhance the value of The Circuit Rider 2 S TEVE S H A P I r O ’ S L E G A C y: intheCourtroom and Beyond By Kathy Agonis* The celebrated appellate lawyer Stephen M. Shapiro passed away on August 13, 2018, leaving a legacy of superlative advocacy and, as importantly, of mentorship and generosity, that made him a credit to this bar and to the profession. A former Assistant and then Deputy Solicitor General and partner at Mayer Brown LLP for 40 years, Steve argued over 30 cases in the Supreme Court of the United States and countless more in the federal courts of appeals, including the Seventh Circuit. During his years of practice, he brought his formidable intellect, unparalleled intensity, and sharp insight to every case he touched. His standard of excellence and professionalism spread to those who worked with him and those who knew him only through his briefs, arguments, and reputation. For some, though, his generous spirit, collegial work style, and ready mentorship of others will match and even eclipse his legal prowess in their memories. I saw Steve a few weeks before his untimely death. He was riding Metra’s Union Pacific North Line, in the back-left window seat in the first car — the same seat in the same car of the same train that he took every day. Sometimes he dozed; sometimes he appeared to be pondering law or life. Oddly, I rarely saw him reading briefs or Westlaw printouts, which he nearly always did when he alighted somewhere. Often I was engrossed in Twitter or was vigorously text messaging. But sometimes we’d meet eyes and wave, or we’d be close enough to exchange a few pleasantries. That day, though, we were partnered perfectly as we exited the car, and we struck up a real conversation. I had left Mayer Brown eight years earlier, as a mid-level associate who stayed about three years at the firm. Steve remembered the job I left to take. He remembered hearing that I had moved on once again. He asked Continued on page 3 *Kathy Agonis is a Deputy Senior Staff Attorney for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and former Mayer Brown associate. She can be reached at [email protected]. The Circuit Rider 3 absence of commonality); Kurz v. Fid. Mgmt. & Research Co., intheCourtroomandBeyond 556 F.3d 639 (7th Cir. 2009) (interpreting the scope of the Continued from page 2 Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act); Goldwasser v. Ameritech Corp., 222 F.3d 390 (7th Cir. 2000) (addressing the intersection of antitrust laws and the Telecommunications Act); AT&T Commc’ns of Illinois, Inc. v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 349 F.3d 402 (7th Cir. 2003) (explaining relation between federal Telecommunications Act and Illinois telecommunications statutes regulating price); Oak Brook Bank v. N. Tr. Co., 256 F.3d 638 about the jobs and whether I was happy. He asked about the status (7th Cir. 2001) (defining when a federal reserve bank is “open of the Seventh Circuit bench with our four new judges, and we to the public”); S. Austin Coal. Cmty. Council v. SBC Commc’ns talked about the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch, his acquaintance. Inc., 191 F.3d 842 (7th Cir. 1999) (considering the ripeness of That led to talk about the high court’s docket for the October action to enjoin a merger). Steve’s Seventh Circuit record was Term and then to his family, and in particular, the news that not 100%, but his legacy of excellence in our appellate court his daughter, Dorothy Lund, had accepted a faculty position at will not soon be eclipsed. University of Southern California’s law school. I had made the mistake of asking Steve about his “kids” — I remembered that When Steve heard that I could write well enough, he occasionally he, about the same age as my own dad, had two. Steve gently staffed me on his appeals. The best parts of working on a brief reminded me his family had lost Michael not very long ago, with Steve were watching his process, hearing him think, and and I was mortified by my memory lapse.
Recommended publications
  • 2017-2018 Supreme Court Preview: Schedule and Panel Members Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Supreme Court Preview Conferences, Events, and Lectures 2017 2017-2018 Supreme Court Preview: Schedule and Panel Members Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School Repository Citation Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School, "2017-2018 Supreme Court Preview: Schedule and Panel Members" (2017). Supreme Court Preview. 275. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview/275 Copyright c 2017 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview 2017 – 2018 Supreme Court Preview Schedule of Events Friday, September 15, 2017 WELCOME 5:00 PM MOOT COURT 5:05 to 6:05 PM CHIEF JUSTICE: Joan Biskupic JUSTICES: Tim Zick, Alli Larsen, Bob Barnes, Pamela Harris, Patricia Millet, Linda Greenhouse, Stuart Raphael, Andy Pincus ADVOCATES: Beth Brinkmann, John Elwood BREAK 6:05 to 6:15 PM MOOT COURT DISCUSSION 6:15 to 6:30 PM TRUMP AND THE COURT 6:35 to 7:25 PM MODERATOR: Adam Liptak PANELISTS: Don Verrilli, Kannon Shanmugam, Pamela Karlan Saturday, September 16, 2017 IMMIGRATION 9:00 to 9:55 AM MODERATOR: Bob Barnes PANELISTS: Jess Bravin, Erin Murphy, Don Verrilli, Chris Landau BUSINESS 10:05 to 11:10 AM MODERATOR: Andy Pincus PANELISTS: Chris Landau, Kannon Shanmugam, Paul Clement, Greg Garre BREAK 11:10 to 11:25 AM CRIMINAL 11:25 AM to 12:15 PM MODERATOR: Adam Gershowitz PANELISTS: Jeff Fisher, Paul Clement, David Savage, Beth Brinkmann BREAK
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING 2020, Vol. 34, Issue 1 SPRING 2020 1
    SPRING 2020, Vol. 34, Issue 1 SPRING 2020 1 MISSION NAWJ’s mission is to promote the judicial role of protecting the rights of individuals under the rule of law through strong, committed, diverse judicial leadership; fairness and equality in the courts; and ON THE COVER 19 Channeling Sugar equal access to justice. Innovative Efforts to Improve Access to Justice through Global Judicial Leadership 21 Learning Lessons from Midyear Meeting in New Orleans addresses Tough Cases BOARD OF DIRECTORS ongoing challenges facing access to justice. Story on page 14 24 Life After the Bench: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Honorable Sharon Mettler PRESIDENT 2 President's Message Hon. Bernadette D'Souza 26 Trial Advocacy Training for Parish of Orleans Civil District Court, Louisiana 2 Interim Executive Director's Women by Women Message PRESIDENT-ELECT 29 District News Hon. Karen Donohue 3 VP of Publications Message King County Superior Court, Seattle, Washington 51 District Directors & Committees 4 Q&A with Judge Ann Breen-Greco VICE PRESIDENT, DISTRICTS Co-Chair Human Trafficking 52 Sponsors Hon. Elizabeth A. White Committee Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County 54 New Members 5 Independent Immigration Courts VICE PRESIDENT, PUBLICATIONS Hon. Heidi Pasichow 7 Resource Board Profile Superior Court of the District of Columbia Cathy Winter-Palmer SECRETARY Hon. Orlinda Naranjo (ret.) 8 Global Judicial Leadership 419th District Court of Texas, Austin Doing the Impossible: NAWJ work with the Pan-American TREASURER Commission of Judges on Social Hon. Elizabeth K. Lee Rights Superior Court of California, San Mateo County IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT 11 Global Judicial Leadership Hon. Tamila E.
    [Show full text]
  • Rex E. Lee Conference on the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States
    BYU Law Review Volume 2003 | Issue 1 Article 1 3-1-2003 Rex E. Lee Conference on the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law and Politics Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Rex E. Lee Conference on the Office ofh t e Solicitor General of the United States, 2003 BYU L. Rev. 1 (2003). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2003/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PANEL-FULL-FIN 2/15/2003 4:02 PM IN MEMORY OF REX E. LEE (1937–1996) Not long after former Solicitor General Rex E. Lee died, the Committee of the National Association of Attorneys General held its annual meeting in Washington, D.C. All fifty state attorneys general attended the meeting, which was held at the Supreme Court. During a question and answer period, Justice David Souter was asked how advocacy before the high court had changed in recent times. Justice Souter paused for a moment and answered, “Well, I can tell you that the biggest change by far is that Rex Lee is gone. Rex Lee was the best Solicitor General this nation has ever had, and he is the best lawyer this Justice ever heard plead a case in this Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Solicitor General
    THE JOURNAL OF APPELLATE PRACTICE AND PROCESS THE OFFICE OF SOLICITOR GENERAL PREFACE If any legal position warrants the appellation, "the appellate lawyer's lawyer," it is that of Solicitor General. Seth Waxman, himself a former Solicitor General, has pointed out that "the office of the Solicitor General of the United States is a wonderful and unique creation,"' noting that only the holder of that office, among all the officers of the federal government, is required by statute to be "learned in the law." 2 President after president has complied with that instruction: The list of Solicitors General that follows this preface includes the names of some of this country's most distinguished lawyers. There may even be those who think of the Solicitors General as a corps of immortals, for as Waxman discovered, "[s]ome 60 years ago, a letter found its way into the United States mail addressed simply 'The Celestial General, Washington, D.C." 3 The inadequacy of the address notwithstanding, the Post Office "apparently had no trouble discerning to whom it should be delivered. It went to Robert H. 1. Seth P. Waxman, Speech, Presenting the Case of the United States As It Should Be: The Solicitor General in Historical Context (address to the Supreme Court Historical Society, Washington, June 1, 1998) at I (available at <http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/about osg/sgarticle.html>). 2. Id. 3. Id. THE JOURNAL OF APPELLATE PRACTICE AND PROCESS Vol. 3, No. 2 (Fall 2001) THE JOURNAL OF APPELLATE PRACTICE AND PROCESS Jackson, then Solicitor General of the United States." 4 Waxman is quick to point out that neither he nor any of his predecessors had "pretensions of other-worldliness," but he does acknowledge that they "have all been fortunate to have been able to serve in what Thurgood Marshall called 'the best job I've ever had." We in the law can see that it is indeed a special job, for the Solicitor General is the only lawyer who, as Francis Biddle put it, "has no master to serve except his country." 6 The responsibilities of the job are great, but so are the rewards.
    [Show full text]
  • Members by Circuit (As of January 3, 2017)
    Federal Judges Association - Members by Circuit (as of January 3, 2017) 1st Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Bruce M. Selya Jeffrey R. Howard Kermit Victor Lipez Ojetta Rogeriee Thompson Sandra L. Lynch United States District Court District of Maine D. Brock Hornby George Z. Singal John A. Woodcock, Jr. Jon David LeVy Nancy Torresen United States District Court District of Massachusetts Allison Dale Burroughs Denise Jefferson Casper Douglas P. Woodlock F. Dennis Saylor George A. O'Toole, Jr. Indira Talwani Leo T. Sorokin Mark G. Mastroianni Mark L. Wolf Michael A. Ponsor Patti B. Saris Richard G. Stearns Timothy S. Hillman William G. Young United States District Court District of New Hampshire Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. Joseph N. LaPlante Landya B. McCafferty Paul J. Barbadoro SteVen J. McAuliffe United States District Court District of Puerto Rico Daniel R. Dominguez Francisco Augusto Besosa Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr. Jay A. Garcia-Gregory Juan M. Perez-Gimenez Pedro A. Delgado Hernandez United States District Court District of Rhode Island Ernest C. Torres John J. McConnell, Jr. Mary M. Lisi William E. Smith 2nd Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Barrington D. Parker, Jr. Christopher F. Droney Dennis Jacobs Denny Chin Gerard E. Lynch Guido Calabresi John Walker, Jr. Jon O. Newman Jose A. Cabranes Peter W. Hall Pierre N. LeVal Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. Reena Raggi Robert A. Katzmann Robert D. Sack United States District Court District of Connecticut Alan H. NeVas, Sr. Alfred V. Covello Alvin W. Thompson Dominic J. Squatrito Ellen B.
    [Show full text]
  • Circuit Circuit
    December 2019 Featured In This Issue In Memoriam Randall Crocker, By Jeffrey Cole An Interview with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, By Hon. Elaine Bucklo TheThe A Historic Chief, By Steven J. Dollear An Interview with Judge Charles P. Kocoras, Editor’s Note By Jeffrey Cole A Life Well Lived: An Interview with Justice John Paul Stevens, By Jeffrey Cole and Elaine E. Bucklo CirCircuitcuit Appeals: The Classic Guide, By William Pannill John Paul Stevens: A True Gentleman of Justice, By Rachael D. Wilson Reversing the Magistrate Judge, By Jeffrey Cole Answering the Call, part 2: The Northern District of Illinois’ Rockford Bankruptcy Help Desk, By Laura McNally RiderRiderT HE J OURNALOFTHE S EVENTH In Recognition of Barbara Crabb, Comments By Diane P. Wood C IRCUITIRCUIT B AR A SSOCIATION Around the Circuit, By Collins T. Fitzpatrick J u d g e s The Circuit Rider In This Issue Letter from the President . 1 In Memoriam Randall Crocker, By Jeffrey Cole . 2 An Interview with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, By Hon. Elaine Bucklo . 3-12 A Historic Chief, By Steven J. Dollear . .13-15 An Interview with Judge Charles P. Kocoras, Editor’s Note By Jeffrey Cole . .16-28 A Life Well Lived: An Interview with Justice John Paul Stevens, By Jeffrey Cole and Elaine E. Bucklo . 29-38 Appeals: The Classic Guide, By William Pannill . .39-48 John Paul Stevens: A True Gentleman of Justice, By Rachael D. Wilson . 49-51 Reversing the Magistrate Judge, By Jeffrey Cole . 52-59 Answering the Call, part 2: The Northern District of Illinois’ Rockford Bankruptcy Help Desk, By Laura McNally .
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Indiana Law Review Volume 30 1997 Number 1 ARTICLES Thirty Years of the Journey of Indiana's Women Judges 1964-1994 Honorable Betty Barteau" Table of Contents Table of Contents 43 Introduction 45 I. The Genesis of Women in the Legal Profession in the United States ... 46 A. The State Bar Experience 46 B. The Federal Experience 52 C. Personal Lives 53 II. The Genesis of Women in the Legal Profession in Indiana 55 in. The Genesis of Women in the Judiciary in the United States 62 IV. The Genesis of Women in the Judiciary in Indiana 65 V. The Arduous Climb from Bar to Bench 70 VI. A Profile of Indiana Women Who Have Made the Arduous Climb 75 A. Education 75 B. Family Life 76 C. Income 77 D. Path to the Profession 78 E. The Practice 79 F. Path to the Bench 80 G. Struggles for Fairness as Judges 84 H. Jurisdiction and Work Preferences 87 /. The Trails Blazed 88 VII. Have Women Judges Made a Difference Nationally 88 VIII. Have Women Judges Made a Difference in Indiana 94 IX. Conclusion 96 Addendum 100 Appendix A: Alphabetical Summary of Women Judges 103 Appendix B: Chronological Summary of Women Judges 108 Appendix C: Biographies of Women Judges (Chronological Order) 113 * Judge, Indiana Court of Appeals. J.D., Indiana University School of Law—Indianapolis; L.L.M., 1995, University of Virginia. 44 INDIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 30:43 Appendix D: Map of State of Indiana Showing Distribution of Women Judges 196 Appendix E: Indiana Judges 197 Appendix F: Indiana Doctors 198 Appendix G: Indiana Senators and Representatives 199 Appendix H: Indiana Law Graduates 200 Appendix I: Years of Practice 201 Appendix J: Indiana Women Judges (Age) 202 Appendix C Index Biography of Vivian Sue Shields 113 Biography of Betty Scales Barteau 115 Biography of Linda L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Supreme Court Preview: Biographies of 2020 Supreme Court Preview Panelists
    William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Supreme Court Preview Conferences, Events, and Lectures 9-11-2020 2020-2021 Supreme Court Preview: Biographies of 2020 Supreme Court Preview Panelists Institute of Bill of Rights Law at The College of William & Mary Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview Part of the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Repository Citation Institute of Bill of Rights Law at The College of William & Mary Law School, "2020-2021 Supreme Court Preview: Biographies of 2020 Supreme Court Preview Panelists" (2020). Supreme Court Preview. 295. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview/295 Copyright c 2020 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview Biographies of 2020 Supreme Court Preview Panelists law.wm.edu/academics/intellectuallife/researchcenters/ibrl/scp/2020/notebook/bios/index.php ROBERT BARNES - Washington Post Robert Barnes has spent most of his career at The Washington Post, as a reporter and editor. He joined the paper to cover politics in 1987, and has covered campaigns at the presidential, congressional and gubernatorial level. He served in various editing positions, including metropolitan editor, deputy national editor in charge of domestic issues and the Supreme Court, and national political editor. He returned to reporting to cover the Supreme Court in November 2006, and has done so since then, with a brief break to cover the conclusion of the 2008 presidential campaign. He covered the Supreme Court nominations of Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.
    [Show full text]
  • Franita Tolson
    FRANITA TOLSON Professor of Law Vice Dean for Faculty and Academic Affairs University of Southern California Gould School of Law Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071 [email protected] · 213-740-7683 ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GOULD SCHOOL OF LAW Los Angeles, CA Vice Dean for Faculty and Academic Affairs July 2019-Present Professor of Law June 2017-Present Visiting Professor of Law February 2016 Courses: Constitutional Law I & II; Election Law; Electing A President (undergraduate course) Service: Co-Chair, Race and the Law Academic Affairs Subcommittee (2020-Present); Faculty Advisor – Southeast Asian Law Students Association (2019-Present); Academic Affairs (2018- 2019); Admissions (2018-2019); Appointments (2017-2018); Experiential Readiness Committee (2017-2018) Reviewer: NYU PRESS; ELECTION LAW JOURNAL; PUBLIUS; CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS; ROUTLEDGE Podcast: Co-Host, Free and Fair with Franita and Foley THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL Chicago, IL Visiting Professor of Law forthcoming Spring 2021 FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW Tallahassee, FL Betty T. Ferguson Professor of Voting Rights 2012 – 2017 Associate Professor (with tenure) 2014 – 2017 Assistant Professor 2009 – 2014 Courses: Constitutional Law II; Election Law; Employment Discrimination; First Amendment; Legislation and Regulation; Race and the Law. Committees: Appointments (2016-2017 (Chair), 2014-2015, 2012-2013); Member, FSU Provost Search Committee (2015); Faculty Enrichment (2014-2015 (Chair), 2010-2011); Faculty Senate (2010-2015); Admissions (2016-2017, 2013-2014); Judicial Clerkships (2009-2012). Honors/Awards: Nominee, FSU University Teaching Award (2016, 2014); Summer Research Grant Recipient (Summer 2009, 2011- 2016); First Year Assistant Professor Research Grant Recipient (Summer 2010). Symposium (organizer): “The Law of Democracy at a Crossroads: Reflecting on Fifty Years of Voting Rights and the Judicial Regulation of the Political Thicket” (March 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • 1939 Journal
    — — I OCTOBEE TEEM, 1939 STATISTICS Original Appellate Total Number of cases on docket _ _ 15 1, 063 1, 078 Cases disposed of __ 4 942 946 Remaining on docket 11 121 132 Cases disposed of By written opinions 151 By per curiam opinions 97 By denial or dismissal of petitions for certiorari 690 By motion to dismiss or per stipulation 8 Number of written opinions 137 Number of admissions to bar 1,016 REFERENCE INDEX Page. Butler, J., death of, announced 73 Butler, J., resolutions of the Bar presented by Attorney Gen- eral Jackson 242 Murphy, J., commission read and oath taken (February 5, 1940) . 146 Eobert H. Jackson, Attorney General, presented his Commis- sion 126 Francis Biddle, Solicitor General, presented 126 Proceedings commemorating 150th Anniversary of Court (February 1, 1940) 136 Address of Attorney General Jackson 136 Address of Charles A. Beardsley, President of American Bar Association 139 Address of the Chief Justice 141 Advisory Committee requested to submit amendments to Eules of Civil Procedure 54 Administrative Office of United States Courts Henry P. Chandler appointed Director 75 Elmore Whitehurst appointed Assistant Director 54 Transfer of appropriations 54,221 Allotment of Justices 158 181208—40 98 — II Page. Disbarment, In the matter of Clyde H. Walker 34 Anna L. Cooke 34,81 David B. Getz 35,81 Walter C. Balderston 46 French B. Loveland (failure to reply to Clerk's communi- cations) 81, 109, 115 Rules of Supreme Court—Rule 41 amended 192 Regulations prescribed in reference to appeals from Court of Claims appearing in 210 U. S.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
    Case: 10-3903 Document: 34 Filed: 08/16/2011 Pages: 23 In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 10-3903 LADY DI’S, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENHANCED SERVICES BILLING, INC. AND ILD TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. d/b/a ILD TELESERVICES, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. No. 1:09-cv-00340-SEB-DML—Sarah Evans Barker, Judge. ARGUED MAY 11, 2011—DECIDED AUGUST 16, 2011 Before ROVNER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and LEFKOW, District Judge. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Lady Di’s, Inc. alleged in this proposed class action that defendants Enhanced The Honorable Joan Humphrey Lefkow of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. Case: 10-3903 Document: 34 Filed: 08/16/2011 Pages: 23 2 No. 10-3903 Services Billing, Inc. (“ESBI”) and ILD Telecommunica- tions, Inc. are billing aggregators engaged in “cramming” by placing unauthorized charges on customers’ tele- phone bills. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants arranged to have unauthorized charges placed on its telephone bill and, in the six years before this suit was filed, have been responsible for unauthorized charges being placed on the telephone bills of more than one million Indiana telephone numbers. The complaint alleged that plaintiff “never requested, authorized, or even knew about” the services for which defendants charged it. The evidence, however, turned out differently. Both defendants produced evidence proving that the plaintiff actually ordered the services in question. Despite that evidence, plaintiff has pursued the case, arguing that although it actually ordered the services, the charges were never properly authorized.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federalist Society
    2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Federalist Society Law schools and the legal profession are currently strongly dominated by a form of orthodox liberal ideology which advocates a centralized and uniform society. While some members of the academic community have dissented from these views, by and large they are taught simultaneously with (and indeed as if they were) the law. The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order. It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. The Society seeks both to promote an awareness of these principles and to further their application through its activities. This entails reordering priorities within the legal system to place a premium on individual liberty, traditional values, and the rule of law. It also requires restoring the recognition of the importance of these norms among lawyers, judges, law students and professors. In working to achieve these goals, the Society has created a conservative intellectual network that extends to all levels of the legal community. Letter from the President The Federalist Society enjoyed great success in 2014. This past year has seen intended the legislature to be the most powerful branch of government. In its the creation and launching of many new initiatives, as well as the achievement present form, most would say it is not.
    [Show full text]