The Blueshirts in Limerick 1932-1936

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Blueshirts in Limerick 1932-1936 he politics of Limerick are intimately intertwined with political and economic developments at national level and are also influenced by general political moods, tensions and economic shifts on the broader inter- national arena, as this article dealing with the Blueshirt movement in Limerick City and County in the 1930s amply illustrates. Ireland's struggle for independence from British rule culminated in the Anglo- Irish Treaty of 1921. Under this agree- ment, Ireland's thirty-two counties were divided: twenty-six were allocated to the Irish Free State, while the remaining six, because of their overall Protestant majority, stayed within the United Kingdom. The acceptance of the partition of the country and the Oath of Allegiance to the British Monarch split the Irish nationalist movement into two factions, those who were pro-Treaty led by Michael Collins, and those who were anti-Treaty, led by Eamon De Valera. The foot soldiers of the movement, the volunteers of the Irish Republican Army, also divided. What followed was a bitter civil war that lasted from June 1922 until May 1923, when the anti-Treaty forces were defeated. On 7 December 1923, the Irish Free State officially came into existence. The members of the Provisional government, under the leadership W.T. Cosgrave, took the name of Cumann na nGaedheal - the Irish Party. Anti-Treaty members elected to the Dail, specifically Sinn Fein, refused to take their seats and remained outside the parliamentary process. This state of affairs came to an end in 1927 following the assassination of the Vice-President and Minister of Justice, Kevin O'Higgins, when the Cosgrave government passed a Bill forcing every elected member to the Dail to either take the Oath of Allegiance to the British Crown or give up his seat. By that time Eamon De Valera's new political party, Fianna Fail, founded in 1926 after he split with Sinn Fein, had become the main political opposition. In laying the groundwork for a democratic state, the government faced a General Owen O'Duffy, about 1932 number of threats to its stability. In 1924, a mutiny by a small group of officers within During the world economic crisis the army was brought to an end when sparked off by the Wall Street Crash Kevin O'Higgins sacked the officers of 1929, the Cumann na nGaedheal involved. The decision of the Boundary government made a number of unpopular Commission in 1925 to retain all the six After this, O'Higgins approached decisions that included the cutting of the northern counties within the British State, members of the British establishment old age pension by one shilling, cuts in the when the government had thought that with Arthur Griffith's old idea of dual salaries of teachers, civil servants and the some of the counties would be re-united monarchy, that is, a 32-county Ireland with Garda Force and the introduction of the with the south, made the partition of the its own government, under a British Intoxicating Liquor Act, which sought to country a permanent feature of Irish life. Monarch; this suggestion fell through.' reduce the number of public houses and shorten opening hours. On 22 January '30s saw the rise of militant, colour- battleground of the 1930s in Ireland was 1932, the entire Garda Force of Limerick shirted, extreme right-wing political not communism: it was going to be the City held a meeting in William Street parties in practically every country in Economic War with Britain and the Barracks and the following resolution was Europe, the two largest being Benito payment of Annuities by the farming adopted: Mussolini's black-shirted fascists in Italy community to the De Valera government. and Adolf Hitler's Brownshirts in The Annuities, which were paid twice a 'We the N.C.O.'s and men of the Germany, who came to power in 1922 and year to the British Government, were Limerick Force, view with the gravest 1933 respectively. Ireland followed the repayments on low interest loans that alarm the action of the Executive European trend with its own homebred Britain had given to Irish farmers in the Council in deciding on a further colour-shirted movement - the Blueshirts. 1890s and early 1900s to help them to buy curtailment of 5% in our emoluments, The Blueshirts had their origins in the land. In the mid-1920s, Peadar O'Donnell, *i and we are strongly of the opinion that Army Comrades Association (ACA), an an anti-treaty IRA leader and socialist, had ' this action on the part of the Executive organisation founded to protect the been actively involved in a campaign not is wholly unjustifiable and is a step interests of ex-Free State soldiers who had to pay Annuities. It was felt that the people taken more in the case of election upheld the Treaty. Two of its founding were paying for land that originally had propaganda than in the interests of members were Commandant Ned Cronin been taken from them. The fact that the econ~my'.~ from Charleville, County Cork, and British Government had scrapped the Colonel Austin Brennan from Meelick, Co. paying of annuities in Northern Ireland By the early 1930s, Cumann na nGaedheal Clare. The ACA began life on 10 February was grist to the mill. De Valera adopted had become so unpopular with the 1932, the same month that De Valera and O'Donnell's proposal in his 1932 election electorate that it was defeated in the Fianna Fail were elected to power. The manifesto, which became official govern- general election of February 1932, objectives of the association were: ment policy when Fianna Fail came to bringing De Valera and his party to power. (a) To uphold the honour of the State. power. The withholding of Annuity In the weeks leading up to polling day, (b) To honour the Irish Volunteers who payments to Britain led to a retaliatory 20% Cumann na nGaedheal election posters had died during the Anglo-Irish War tax imposed on Irish goods imported into emphasised their achievements of the of Independence and to raise a Britain. This was particularly detrimental previous ten years, including the national memorial to them. to Ireland's cattle export trade, hitting establishment of a sound financial (C) To be non-political and non-sectarian.7 those 'big farmers' who tended to be position, which was, they maintained, the But this rather innocuous policy began to Cumann na nGaedheal supporters. In envy of Europe and Arneri~a.~Conversely, change when Fianna Fail began releasing reply to these measures, the Irish they portrayed Fianna Fail's election IRA political prisoners and lifting the government applied import duties to promises as a threat to the stability of the former government's ban on such left British goods. state and hinted that Fianna Fail was wing organizations as Saor Eire and the Meanwhile, attacks on Cumann na influenced by socialist and communist Irish Communist Party. Large open-air nGaedheal meetings were becoming more ideas.4 meetings were held to celebrate the frequent. On Sunday, 9 October 1932, Nevertheless. Fianna Fail swe~tto release of Republican prisoners and several hundred Fianna Fail supporters, power on a platform of radical ideas and threats were made by speakers against some of them marching four square in promises: Cumann na nGaedheal to the effect that military formation with hurleys on their 1. Fianna FAil would abolish the Oath of the hour of retribution had come.8 The shoulders,14 gathered in the Co. Limerick Allegiance. release of the prisoners was seen by town of Kilmallock to obstruct a Cumann 2. Fianna Fail would keep the Annuities Cumann na nGaedheal supporters as an na nGaedheal meeting which was to take within the country and get advice on attempt to stifle any opposition to Fianna place that afternoon. As soon as the whether or not the Irish Government Fail and as a threat to the freedom of speakers, who were accompanied by fifty should pay pensions to members of speech? for calls were openly being made or sixtv ACA men. stood UD on the back of the former police force, the Royal by IRA leaders for the suppression of the a lorry to make their speeches the attack Irish Constabulary. 'Free State traitors' and the 'Cosgravite began. In the hand-to-hand fighting that 3. Fianna Fail would encourage the traitors1.1o In April, ex-President Cosgrave followed, hurleys, sticks, stones and creation of Irish manufacturing was prevented from speaking at a meeting bottles were used as weapons. As the industries to meet the needs of the in Cork by a hostile mob. fighting continued, Fianna Fail supporters people and protect the home market In August 1932, Colonel T.F. tried to start a rival meeting. When the for farmers to encourage them to O'Higgins, brother of the assassinated Cumann na nGaedheal speakers returned grow enough food for the population. Minister of Justice Kevin O'Higgins, took to Lyon's Hotel, they were attacked, as 4. Fianna Fail would negotiate foreign over the leadership of the Army Comrades were members of a band from Limerick. trade agreements that would give Association. In response to the IRA's call One former member of the Blueshirts, to preference to Irish goods. for a 'No Free Speech For Traitors' whom this writer spoke, related how he They also pledged to try to end, by campaign, O'Higgins said that the ACA and some other men were trapped in the peaceful means, the partition of the would stand shoulder to shoulder for hotel. When I asked if he had thrown any country.
Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Note: page numbers in italics denote illustrations or maps Abbey Theatre 175 sovereignty 390 Abbot, Charles 28 as Taoiseach 388–9 abdication crisis 292 and Trimble 379, 409, 414 Aberdeen, Earl of 90 Aiken, Frank abortion debate 404 ceasefire 268–9 Academical Institutions (Ireland) Act 52 foreign policy 318–19 Adams, Gerry and Lemass 313 assassination attempt 396 and Lynch 325 and Collins 425 and McGilligan 304–5 elected 392 neutrality 299 and Hume 387–8, 392, 402–3, 407 reunification 298 and Lynch 425 WWII 349 and Paisley 421 air raids, Belfast 348, 349–50 St Andrews Agreement 421 aircraft industry 347 on Trimble 418 Aldous, Richard 414 Adams, W.F. 82 Alexandra, Queen 174 Aer Lingus 288 Aliens Act 292 Afghan War 114 All for Ireland League 157 Agar-Robartes, T.G. 163 Allen, Kieran 308–9, 313 Agence GénéraleCOPYRIGHTED pour la Défense de la Alliance MATERIAL Party 370, 416 Liberté Religieuse 57 All-Ireland Committee 147, 148 Agricultural Credit Act 280 Allister, Jim 422 agricultural exports 316 Alter, Peter 57 agricultural growth 323 American Civil War 93, 97–8 Agriculture and Technical Instruction, American note affair 300 Dept of 147 American War of Independence 93 Ahern, Bertie 413 Amnesty Association 95, 104–5, 108–9 and Paisley 419–20 Andrews, John 349, 350–1 resignation 412–13, 415 Anglesey, Marquis of 34 separated from wife 424 Anglicanism 4, 65–6, 169 Index 513 Anglo-American war 93 Ashbourne Purchase Act 133, 150 Anglo-Irish Agreement (1938) 294, 295–6 Ashe, Thomas 203 Anglo-Irish Agreement (1985) Ashtown ambush 246 aftermath
    [Show full text]
  • BMH.WS1721.Pdf
    ROINN COSANTA BUREAU OF MILITARY HISTORY, 1913-21 STATEMENT BY WITNESS. DOCUMENT NO. W.S. 1721. Witness Seumas Robinson 18 Highfield Foad, Rathgar, Dublin. Identity. O/C. South Tipperary Brigade. O/C. 2nd Southern Division, I.R.A. Member of Volunteer Executive. Member of Bureau of Military History. Subject. Irish Volunteer activities, Dublin, 1916. I.R.A.activities, Tipperary, 1917-1921 Conditions, if any, Stipulated by Witness. Nil. File No S.132. Form BSM2 SEUMASROBINSON. 1902. Joined the first Fianna (Red Branch Knights); founded by Bulmer Hobson in 1902, Belfast. 1902. Joined "Oscar" junior hurling club, Belfast. 1903. Joined Gaelic League, Glasgow. 1913. December. Joined the Irish Volunteers, (Glasgow. 1916. January. Attached to Kimmage Garrison. 1916. Easter Week. Stationed i/c. at Hopkins & Hopkins, O'Connell Street (Bride). 1916. May. Interned Richmond Barracks (one week), Stafford Gaol, Frongoch, Reading Gaol. Released Christmas Day, 1916. 1917. February. Assisted in reorganising the Volunteers in Tipperary. l9l8. October, Elected Brigadier, South Tipperary Brigade. 1920. Elected T.D. to Second Dáil, East Tipperary and Waterford. 1921. November December. Appointed O/C., 2nd Southern Division, I.R.A., in succession to E. O'Malley. 1922. Elected Member of Volunteer Executive. l928. Elected Senator. 1935. January. Appointed Member of M.S.P. Board. l949. Appointed Member, Bureau of Military History. 1953. (?) Appointed Member of Military Registration Board. STATEMENTBY Mr. SEUMASROBINSON, 18, Highfield Road, Rathgar, Dublin. - Introduction - "A SOLDIER OF IRELAND" REFLECTS. Somewhere deep in the camera (or is it the anti-camera) of my cerebrum (or is it my cerebellum"), whose loci, by the way, are the frontal lobes of the cranium of this and every other specimen of homo-sapiens - there lurks furtively and nebulously, nevertheless positively, a thing, a something, a conception (deception'), a perception, an inception, that the following agglomeration of reminiscences will be "my last Will and Testament".
    [Show full text]
  • The O'keeffes of Glenough by Robert O'keeffe Nora O'keeffe Was Born In
    The O’Keeffes of Glenough by Robert O’Keeffe Nora O’Keeffe was born in Glenough, Rossmore Co. Tipperary in 1885, and was one of 12 children. The family were steeped in the nationalist tradition and her father, Dan, was a Nationalist Justice of Peace and a respected nationalist figure locally. There are uncorroborated stories of involvement in the Fenian outbreak of 1867 (Fr Denis Matthew O’Keeffe’s history). Nora emigrated to the US in 1909 and worked as a typist/stenographer. She appears to have returned to Ireland in 1918/9 along with her brother Patrick. During her time in the US she appears to have met Margaret Skinnider with whom it is thought she had a life long same sex relationship. (McAuliffe) She became active with Cumann na mBan and was among those listed in Bureau of Military History statements as having dispersed the gelignite from the Sologheadbeg ambush across the Brigade area. The younger members of the family seem to have immersed themselves in the national struggle at this time. This was probably due in no small part to the presence in the locality of staunch Republicans such as Fr Matt Ryan of Knockavilla, Eamonn O’Duibhir of Ballagh and the Irish teacher, Padraig Breathnach. The house at Glenough was used as a safe house and also played host to brigade meetings. The “Big Four” of Robinson, Breen, Treacy and Hogan were regular visitors as was Ernie O’Malley. O’Malley mentions the family in his autobiography “On another man’s wound” and also in his book “Raids and Rallies”.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Responses to Fascist Italy, 1919–1932 by Mark Phelan
    Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title Irish responses to Fascist Italy, 1919-1932 Author(s) Phelan, Mark Publication Date 2013-01-07 Item record http://hdl.handle.net/10379/3401 Downloaded 2021-09-27T09:47:44Z Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. Irish responses to Fascist Italy, 1919–1932 by Mark Phelan A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Prof. Gearóid Ó Tuathaigh Department of History School of Humanities National University of Ireland, Galway December 2012 ABSTRACT This project assesses the impact of the first fascist power, its ethos and propaganda, on key constituencies of opinion in the Irish Free State. Accordingly, it explores the attitudes, views and concerns expressed by members of religious organisations; prominent journalists and academics; government officials/supporters and other members of the political class in Ireland, including republican and labour activists. By contextualising the Irish response to Fascist Italy within the wider patterns of cultural, political and ecclesiastical life in the Free State, the project provides original insights into the configuration of ideology and social forces in post-independence Ireland. Structurally, the thesis begins with a two-chapter account of conflicting confessional responses to Italian Fascism, followed by an analysis of diplomatic intercourse between Ireland and Italy. Next, the thesis examines some controversial policies pursued by Cumann na nGaedheal, and assesses their links to similar Fascist initiatives. The penultimate chapter focuses upon the remarkably ambiguous attitude to Mussolini’s Italy demonstrated by early Fianna Fáil, whilst the final section recounts the intensely hostile response of the Irish labour movement, both to the Italian regime, and indeed to Mussolini’s Irish apologists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish Party System Sistemul Partidelor Politice În Irlanda
    The Irish Party System Sistemul Partidelor Politice în Irlanda Assistant Lecturer Javier Ruiz MARTÍNEZ Fco. Javier Ruiz Martínez: Assistant Lecturer of Polics and Public Administration. Department of Politics and Sociology, University Carlos III Madrid (Spain). Since September 2001. Lecturer of “European Union” and “Spanish Politics”. University Studies Abroad Consortium (Madrid). Ph.D. Thesis "Modernisation, Changes and Development in the Irish Party System, 1958-96", (European joint Ph.D. degree). Interests and activities: Steering Committee member of the Spanish National Association of Political Scientists and Sociologists; Steering committee member of the European Federation of Centres and Associations of Irish Studies, EFACIS; Member of the Political Science Association of Ireland; Founder of the Spanish-American Association of the University of Limerick (Éire) in 1992; User level in the command of Microsoft Office applications, graphics (Harvard Graphics), databases (Open Access) SPSSWIN and Internet applications. Abstract: The Irish Party System has been considered a unique case among the European party systems. Its singularity is based in the freezing of its actors. Since 1932 the three main parties has always gotten the same position in every election. How to explain this and which consequences produce these peculiarities are briefly explained in this article. Rezumat: Sistemul Irlandez al Partidelor Politice a fost considerat un caz unic între sistemele partidelor politice europene. Singularitatea sa este bazată pe menţinerea aceloraşi actori. Din 1932, primele trei partide politice ca importanţă au câştigat aceeaşi poziţie la fiecare scrutin electoral. Cum se explică acest lucru şi ce consecinţe produc aceste aspecte, se descrie pe larg în acest articol. At the end of the 1950s the term ‘system’ began to be used in Political Science coming from the natural and physical Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Shirt Movements in Interwar Europe: a Totalitarian Fashion
    Ler História | 72 | 2018 | pp. 151-173 SHIRT MOVEMENTS IN INTERWAR EUROPE: A TOTALITARIAN FASHION Juan Francisco Fuentes 151 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain [email protected] The article deals with a typical phenomenon of the interwar period: the proliferation of socio-political movements expressing their “mood” and identity via a paramilitary uniform mainly composed of a coloured shirt. The analysis of 34 European shirt movements reveals some common features in terms of colour, ideology and chronology. Most of them were consistent with the logic and imagery of interwar totalitarianisms, which emerged as an alleged alternative to the decaying bourgeois society and its main political creation: the Parliamentary system. Unlike liBeral pluralism and its institutional expression, shirt move- ments embody the idea of a homogeneous community, based on a racial, social or cultural identity, and defend the streets, not the Ballot Boxes, as a new source of legitimacy. They perfectly mirror the overwhelming presence of the “brutalization of politics” (Mosse) and “senso-propaganda” (Chakhotin) in interwar Europe. Keywords: fascism, Nazism, totalitarianism, shirt movements, interwar period. Resumo (PT) no final do artigo. Résumé (FR) en fin d’article. “Of all items of clothing, shirts are the most important from a politi- cal point of view”, Eugenio Xammar, Berlin correspondent of the Spanish newspaper Ahora, wrote in 1932 (2005b, 74). The ability of the body and clothing to sublimate, to conceal or to express the intentions of a political actor was by no means a discovery of interwar totalitarianisms. Antoine de Baecque studied the political dimension of the body as metaphor in eighteenth-century France, paying special attention to the three specific func- tions that it played in the transition from the Ancien Régime to revolutionary France: embodying the state, narrating history and peopling ceremonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Political and Public Reactions to the Spanish Civil War
    Neutral Ireland? Irish Political and Public Reactions to the Spanish Civil War Lili ZÁCH University of Szeged The Spanish Civil War is considered to be one of the most significant events in the in- ter-war period. Interestingly, the events between 1936 and 1939 reflect not only the for- mulation of power politics in Europe, but also the aims of the Irish1 government in diplo- matic terms. Irish participation in the Spanish Civil War attracted considerable attention recently. However, the Iberian events were not given primary importance in the history of Irish foreign policy. Anglo-Irish relations and the concept of Irish neutrality during and after the Second World War have been the key issues. Although it is a well-known fact in Irish historical circles that the overwhelming majority of the Irish population was support- ing Franco because of religious reasons, other aspects such as the Irish government's ad- herence to non-intervention and the motivations behind it are mostly ignored. So I am inclined to think that it is worth examining the Irish reaction to the Spanish Civil War in its entirety; that is, paying attention to the curiosity of non-intervention as well. This is more than interesting as the "Irishmen were not, as yet, intervening in Spain; but few were neutral."2 In order to provide an insight into Irish public opinion, I based my research partly on the reports of contemporary Dublin-centred Irish daily newspapers, namely the 'conserva- tive' Irish Independent, the 'republican' Irish Press and the 'liberal' Irish Times. All three took different stands on the Spanish Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Sinn Féin
    UNDERSTANDING 1917 AND BEYOND THE RISE OF SINN FÉIN THE RISE OF SINN FÉIN Sinn Féin, as a political entity, was founded on 28th November 1905 at the first annual convention of the National Council. Based on policies he had previously written about in The Resurrection of Hungary (1904), Arthur Griffith presented a detailed programme that would be later published as ‘The Sinn Féin Policy’. THE SINN FÉIN POLICY 'Sinn Féin' began life as a slogan, used by many Irish nationalists and organisations – it is believed that it originates from an early motto of the Gaelic League: ‘Sinn féin, sinn féin amháain’, meaning ‘Ourselves, ourselves alone’. Arthur Griffith - a well known journalist and nationalist - then adopted this slogan to describe his policy that would go on to become the foundation of Sinn Féin. Formally a member of the Irish Republican Brotherhood (IRB), Griffith began to oppose their more radical aims. Griffith believed that Ireland could not win independence through physical means, nor was he fully convinced that self-governance could be achieved politically. Arthur Griffith Griffith was a journalist and Irish Instead, Griffith urged a policy ofpassive resistance: refusal to pay taxes, Nationalist who gained fame boycotting of British goods as part of a wider plan to make Ireland self for his political writings and sufficient, creating independent Irish courts, the establishment of a National later, his political career. Griffith Council in Ireland and Irish MPs withdrawing from Westminster (abstention). was instrumental in the founda- As part of his policy, Griffith also supported thedual monarchy approach: tion of a number of national- that Ireland should become its own kingdom alongside Britain, with the two ist organisations, newspapers forming a dual monarchy – a shared monarch with two separate governments.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Modern Ireland 1800-1969
    ireiana Edward Norman I Edward Norman A History of Modem Ireland 1800-1969 Advisory Editor J. H. Plumb PENGUIN BOOKS 1971 Contents Preface to the Pelican Edition 7 1. Irish Questions and English Answers 9 2. The Union 29 3. O'Connell and Radicalism 53 4. Radicalism and Reform 76 5. The Genesis of Modern Irish Nationalism 108 6. Experiment and Rebellion 138 7. The Failure of the Tiberal Alliance 170 8. Parnellism 196 9. Consolidation and Dissent 221 10. The Revolution 254 11. The Divided Nation 289 Note on Further Reading 315 Index 323 Pelican Books A History of Modern Ireland 1800-1969 Edward Norman is lecturer in modern British constitutional and ecclesiastical history at the University of Cambridge, Dean of Peterhouse, Cambridge, a Church of England clergyman and an assistant chaplain to a hospital. His publications include a book on religion in America and Canada, The Conscience of the State in North America, The Early Development of Irish Society, Anti-Catholicism in 'Victorian England and The Catholic Church and Ireland. Edward Norman also contributes articles on religious topics to the Spectator. Preface to the Pelican Edition This book is intended as an introduction to the political history of Ireland in modern times. It was commissioned - and most of it was actually written - before the present disturbances fell upon the country. It was unfortunate that its publication in 1971 coincided with a moment of extreme controversy, be¬ cause it was intended to provide a cool look at the unhappy divisions of Ireland. Instead of assuming the structure of interpretation imposed by writers soaked in Irish national feeling, or dependent upon them, the book tried to consider Ireland’s political development as a part of the general evolu¬ tion of British politics in the last two hundred years.
    [Show full text]
  • Fianna Fáil: Past and Present
    Fianna Fáil: Past and Present Alan Byrne Fianna Fáil were the dominant political prompted what is usually referred to as party in Ireland from their first term in gov- a civil-war but as Kieran Allen argues in ernment in the 1930s up until their disas- an earlier issue of this journal, the Free trous 2011 election. The party managed to State in effect mounted a successful counter- enjoy large support from the working class, revolution which was thoroughly opposed to as well as court close links with the rich- the working class movement.3 The defeat est people in Irish society. Often described signalled the end of the aspirations of the as more of a ‘national movement’ than a Irish revolution and the stagnation of the party, their popular support base has now state economically. Emigration was par- plummeted. As this article goes to print, ticularly high in this period, and the state the party (officially in opposition but en- was thoroughly conservative. The Catholic abling a Fine Gael government) is polling Church fostered strong links with Cumann at 26% approval.1 How did a party which na nGaedheal, often denouncing republicans emerged from the losing side of the civil war in its sermons. come to dominate Irish political life so thor- There were distinctive class elements to oughly? This article aims to trace the his- both the pro and anti-treaty sides. The tory of the party, analyse their unique brand Cumann na nGaedheal government drew its of populist politics as well as their relation- base from large farmers, who could rely on ship with Irish capitalism and the working exports to Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • A RE-EVALUATION of CHIANG KAISHEK's BLUESHIRTS Chinese Fascism in the 1930S
    A RE-EVALUATION OF CHIANG KAISHEK’S BLUESHIRTS Chinese Fascism in the 1930s A Dissertation Submitted to the School of Oriental and African Studies of the University of London in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy DOOEUM CHUNG ProQuest Number: 11015717 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11015717 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 2 Abstract Abstract This thesis considers the Chinese Blueshirts organisation from 1932 to 1938 in the context of Chiang Kaishek's attempts to unify and modernise China. It sets out the terms of comparison between the Blueshirts and Fascist organisations in Europe and Japan, indicating where there were similarities and differences of ideology and practice, as well as establishing links between them. It then analyses the reasons for the appeal of Fascist organisations and methods to Chiang Kaishek. Following an examination of global factors, the emergence of the Blueshirts from an internal point of view is considered. As well as assuming many of the characteristics of a Fascist organisation, especially according to the Japanese model and to some extent to the European model, the Blueshirts were in many ways typical of the power-cliques which were already an integral part of Chinese politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Iarnród Éireann
    Cork Line Level Crossings Volume 3, Chapter 12: Cultural Heritage Iarnród Éireann March 2021 EIAR Chapter 12 C ultural H eritage Iarnr ód Éir eann Volume 3, Chapter 12: Cultural Heritage Cork Line Level Crossings Project No: 32111000 Document Title: EIAR Chapter 12 Cultural Heritage Document No. 12 Revision: A04 Date: March 2021 Client Name: Iarnród Éireann Project Manager: Alex Bradley Author: AMS Ltd Jacobs U.K. Limited Artola House 3rd & 4th Floors 91 Victoria Street Belfast BT1 4PN T +44 (0)28 9032 4452 F +44 (0)28 9033 0713 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2021 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description Author Checked Reviewed Approved A01 December Client Review AMS AMS RM AB 2019 A02 November Interim Draft pending Archaeological AMS HC HC AB 2020 Investigations A03 March Final draft AMS AMS RM AB 2021 A04 March For Issue to An Bord Pleanála AMS AMS HC/RM AB 2021 i Volume 3, Chapter 12: Cultural Heritage Contents 12. Cultural Heritage ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]