Aagaard, J., Willis, J., and Phillips, P. 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aagaard, J., Willis, J., and Phillips, P. 2006 J Mol Evol (2006) xx:1–13 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-005-0306-x Relaxed Selection Among Duplicate Floral Regulatory Genes in Lamiales Jan E. Aagaard,1,3 John H. Willis,2 Patrick C. Phillips1 1 Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA 2 Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA 3 Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Box 357730, Seattle, WA 98195, USA Received: 19 December 2005 / Accepted: 12 June 2006 [Reviewing Editor: Dr. Yves van de Peer] Abstract. Polyploidization is a prevalent mode of responsible for preservation of co-orthologs of FLO genome diversification within plants. Most gene and DEF in Lamiales, including interactions among duplicates arising from polyploidization (paralogs) the genes of this regulatory pathway. are typically lost, although a subset may be main- tained under selection due to dosage, partitioning of Key words: Gene duplication — Floral regulatory gene function, or acquisition of novel functions. Be- genes cause they experience selection in the presence of other duplicate loci across the genome, interactions among genes may also play a significant role in the maintenance of paralogs resulting from polyploidi- zation. Previously, we identified duplicates of the Introduction genes LFY/FLO and AP3/DEF that directly interact in a floral regulatory pathway and are thought to be Polyploidization occurs frequently in flowering the result of ancient polyploidization in the Lamiales plants. Estimates of the frequency of polyploidization (> 50 mya). Although duplicates of MADS box based on cytological studies vary widely but sug- genes including AP3/DEF are common throughout gest up to 70% of angiosperms may be polyploids the angiosperm lineage, LFY/FLO duplicates in (Wendel 2000; Otto and Whitton 2000). Analysis of Lamiales are the first reported outside of tetraploid cDNA and genomic sequences similarly shows that taxa. In order to explore hypotheses for the joint both recent and ancient polyploidization among crop preservation of these interacting floral regulatory and model plant taxa are common (Blanc and Wolfe genes including novel LFY/FLO paralogs, here we 2004a). The relative importance of polyploidization clone FLO and DEF duplicates from additional to the evolution and diversification of flowering Lamiales taxa and apply codon substitution models plants (angiosperms) has been extensively debated to test how selection acts on both genes following (e.g., Stebbins 1971; Levin 1983) and is reviewed duplication. We find acceleration in the ratio of elsewhere (Otto and Whitton 2000). It is clear, how- nonsynonymous-to-synonymous nucleotide substitu- ever, that polyploidization contributes significantly tions for one (FLO) or both (DEF) paralogs that to the long-term genomic content of angiosperm appears to be due to relaxed purifying selection as taxa. For example, more than half of all genes from opposed to positive selection and shows a different Arabidopsis thaliana are thought to be the result of pattern among functional domains of these genes. ancient polyploidization (Maere et al. 2005), with Several mechanisms are discussed that might be approximately 20% of predicted genes resulting from a whole-genome duplication event that occurred Correspondence to: Jan E. Aagaard; email: jaagaard@gs. 24–40 million years ago (mya; Blanc et al. 2003; Blanc washington.edu and Wolfe 2004b). 2 Because the contribution of polyploidization to have broad impact on duplicate gene preservation plant evolution is ultimately a function of the across the polyploid genome through concerted duplicate genes that are maintained within ge- divergence of the interacting members of genetic nomes, it is important to understand both the pathways and gene networks (Blanc and Wolfe patterns and mechanisms of duplicate gene preser- 2004b), essentially a multilocus extension of sub- vation. The majority of duplicates (paralogs) arising functionalization models. from polyploidization in plants are silenced. In the Previously, we identified duplicates of several case of A.thaliana , nearly 70% of paralog pairs regulatory genes important in floral development from the last polyploid event have lost one member within the order of tricolpate plants Lamiales (Aag- (Blanc et al. 2003). Although there is some sug- aard et al. 2005). These include co-orthologs of the gestion that paralogs resulting from polyploidiza- floral meristem identity gene FLO (Coen et al. 1990) tion may persist longer (Otto and Whitton 2000; and floral homeotic MADS box gene DEF (Sommer Moore and Purugganan 2003; Lynch and Conery et al. 1990) from the model Lamiales species Antir- 2001), this is generally consistent with patterns for rhinum majus. Orthologs of FLO and DEF from A. smaller-scale duplication events (e.g., tandem or thaliana (LFY and AP3, respectively [Weigel et al. segmental duplications) which suggest that silencing 1992; Jack et al. 1992]) carry out similar functions in due to loss of function mutations predominates the floral regulatory pathway as in A.majus , where (Walsh 1995), resulting in a half-life for fully LFY/FLO positively regulates the expression of the redundant paralogs which is generally less than 10 downstream gene AP3/DEF (Ingram et al. 1997; million years (Lynch and Conery 2000). However, Weigel and Meyerowitz 1993). Duplication of the A. the probability that one member of a paralog pair majus genes FLO and DEF in Lamiales is thought to is lost appears to differ markedly among functional be the result of a whole-genome duplication (poly- classes of genes depending on the mechanism of ploidization) which occurred after the split between gene duplication. For example, in A.thaliana par- the ancestor of A.majus (Veronicaceae) and the alogs of regulatory genes involved in transcription lineage leading to many of the other families of and signal transduction are retained at a higher Lamiales including Verbenaceae, Paulowniaceae, rate if duplicates are the result of polyploidization Phrymaceae, and Orobanchaceae (Aagaard et al. rather than smaller-scale gene duplication events 2005). Co-orthologs of both genes (FLOA and (Maere et al. 2005). FLOB, DEFA and DEFB) are expressed and appear Paralogs that escape the typical fate of silencing functional in multiple taxa from these four families, and are maintained within genomes under selection and have been maintained within multiple lineages may be preserved via a number of mechanisms. that diverged 30–50 mya (Wickstrom et al. 2001). Theory suggests that preservation of paralogs is Significantly, duplicates of AP3/DEF from several primarily due to parsing of the ancestral single- points along the angiosperm phylogeny are known copy geneÕs functions among duplicates (subfunc- (Theissen et al. 2000; Kramer et al. 1998, 2003), al- tionalization) rather than the acquisition of novel though Lamiales represents an as yet novel case of gene function driven by positive selection, based in ancient LFY/FLO paralogs (Cronk 2001). large part on the predominance of degenerate ra- The purpose of the present study is to explore ther than adaptive mutations (e.g., Force et al. hypotheses regarding the evolutionary forces acting 1999). Subfunctionalization can result from com- among these paralogs that may be responsible for the plementary degenerate mutations restricted to reg- maintenance of duplicate copies. Here we clone ulatory regions as in the model of Force et al. additional co-orthologs of the floral regulatory genes (1999) or involve functional domains within protein FLO and DEF from four taxa within the Lamiales coding regions, resulting in an altered pattern of family Phrymaceae (sensu Beardsley and Olmstead amino acid substitution between duplicates (Der- 2002) to supplement our earlier work (Aagaard et al. mitzakis and Clark 2001). Because paralogs arising 2005) in order to have sufficient power for likelihood- from polyploidization experience selection along based statistical tests employing codon substitution with other duplicate loci across the genome, inter- models (Aagaard and Phillips 2005). We then test for actions among loci may also contribute significantly rate heterogeneity and the role of selection in diver- to their maintenance. Such interactions could result gence among FLO and DEF paralogs following from simple dosage effects, which should predomi- duplication in Lamiales using several different codon nate among genes functioning within metabolic substitution models. Based on these results, we ex- pathways and regulatory genes involved in signal plore several mechanisms to explain the maintenance transduction and transcription (Birchler et al. of the joint preservation of paralogs from multiple 2001). Alternately, divergence in the timing or genes that are interacting members of the floral reg- expression domains among pairs of paralogs could ulatory pathway. 3 spanning intron 2, 5¢-RACE was used to extend sequence to the 5¢- termini of coding regions. In contrast, AP3/DEF-like homologs were cloned directly from 3¢-RACE cDNA pools. Briefly, a single degenerate primer at the 5¢ terminus of the DEF coding region (5¢-ATGGCTCGTGGGAAGATHCARAT-3¢) was used in 3¢- RACE, after which PCR products were directly cloned and sequenced (at least 12clones sequenced per 3 ¢RACE PCR). Nucleotide alignments of the newly cloned LFY/FLO- and AP3/DEF-like genes from Phrymaceae as well as Solanales and Lamiales homologs (Supplementary Table S1) were carried out initially based on the translated nucleotide (protein) sequence using the ClustalX algorithm
Recommended publications
  • Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National
    Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge Prepared for the US Fish and Wildlife Service National Elk Refuge By Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database The Nature Conservancy 1604 Grand Avenue Laramie, WY 82070 February 28, 1998 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance with this project: Jim Ozenberger, ecologist with the Jackson Ranger District of Bridger-Teton National Forest, for guiding me in his canoe on Flat Creek and for providing aerial photographs and lodging; Jennifer Whipple, Yellowstone National Park botanist, for field assistance and help with field identification of rare Carex species; Dr. David Cooper of Colorado State University, for sharing field information from his 1994 studies; Dr. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, for providing access to unmounted collections by Michele Potkin and others from the National Elk Refuge; Dr. Anton Reznicek of the University of Michigan, for confirming the identification of several problematic Carex specimens; Dr. Robert Dorn for confirming the identification of several vegetative Salix specimens; and lastly Bruce Smith and the staff of the National Elk Refuge for providing funding and logistical support and for allowing me free rein to roam the refuge for plants. 2 Table of Contents Page Introduction . 6 Study Area . 6 Methods . 8 Results . 10 Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge . 10 Plant Species of Special Concern . 10 Species Summaries . 23 Aster borealis . 24 Astragalus terminalis . 26 Carex buxbaumii . 28 Carex parryana var. parryana . 30 Carex sartwellii . 32 Carex scirpoidea var. scirpiformis .
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado
    Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Peggy Lyon and Julia Hanson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 December 2005 Cover: Imperiled (G1 and G2) plants of the San Juan Public Lands, top left to bottom right: Lesquerella pruinosa, Draba graminea, Cryptantha gypsophila, Machaeranthera coloradoensis, Astragalus naturitensis, Physaria pulvinata, Ipomopsis polyantha, Townsendia glabella, Townsendia rothrockii. Executive Summary This survey was a continuation of several years of rare plant survey on San Juan Public Lands. Funding for the project was provided by San Juan National Forest and the San Juan Resource Area of the Bureau of Land Management. Previous rare plant surveys on San Juan Public Lands by CNHP were conducted in conjunction with county wide surveys of La Plata, Archuleta, San Juan and San Miguel counties, with partial funding from Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO); and in 2004, public lands only in Dolores and Montezuma counties, funded entirely by the San Juan Public Lands. Funding for 2005 was again provided by San Juan Public Lands. The primary emphases for field work in 2005 were: 1. revisit and update information on rare plant occurrences of agency sensitive species in the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) database that were last observed prior to 2000, in order to have the most current information available for informing the revision of the Resource Management Plan for the San Juan Public Lands (BLM and San Juan National Forest); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtleheads— the Genus Chelone by Todd Boland, Research Horticulturist, MUNBG
    Turtleheads— The Genus Chelone by Todd Boland, Research Horticulturist, MUNBG It seems that most of the flower arrangements. genera of plants grown in our North American gardens hail from Europe or Asia. Only a handful of ornamentals are purely North American natives with Phlox, Rudbeckia and Echinacea as a few examples. Another genus, perhaps not as popular as the species previously mentioned, is Chelone, commonly called turtlehead. In Greek mythology, Chelone was a nymph who made derogatory remarks about the marriage of Zeus and Hera. In retribution, she was turned into a Chelone glabra tortoise, condemning her to eternal silence. Within the Greek language, The most widespread species is the “chelone” then became the word for white turtlehead or balmony, C. tortoise (and hence the common name glabra. This plant extends west as far for this plant). as Manitoba and Minnesota, east to Newfoundland and south as far as There are only 4 species within the Georgia and Mississippi. Rated to zone genus Chelone. In the wild, they grow 3, it is the hardiest species. Although on the edges of streams, lakes, bogs not as showy as the other species, this and wet thickets throughout eastern one does have fragrant flowers. There North America. Based on their growing are at least 9 botanical varieties which preferences in the wild, they prefer a exhibit slightly varying botanical moist site. To accommodate them in differences. The species C. chlorantha the garden, position them in full sun and C. montana, sometimes found in and incorporate plenty of organic older literature, are now classified as material in the growing area as a varieties of the white turtlehead.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Evolution of Asterids!
    Diversity and Evolution of Asterids! . mints and snapdragons . ! *Boraginaceae - borage family! Widely distributed, large family of alternate leaved plants. Typically hairy. Typically possess helicoid or scorpiod cymes = compound monochasium. Many are poisonous or used medicinally. Mertensia virginica - Eastern bluebells *Boraginaceae - borage family! CA (5) CO (5) A 5 G (2) Gynobasic style; not terminal style which is usual in plants; this feature is shared with the mint family (Lamiaceae) which is not related Myosotis - forget me not 2 carpels each with 2 ovules are separated at maturity and each further separated into 1 ovuled compartments Fruit typically 4 nutlets *Boraginaceae - borage family! Echium vulgare Blueweed, viper’s bugloss adventive *Boraginaceae - borage family! Hackelia virginiana Beggar’s-lice Myosotis scorpioides Common forget-me-not *Boraginaceae - borage family! Lithospermum canescens Lithospermum incisium Hoary puccoon Fringed puccoon *Boraginaceae - borage family! pin thrum Lithospermum canescens • Lithospermum (puccoon) - classic Hoary puccoon dimorphic heterostyly *Boraginaceae - borage family! Mertensia virginica Eastern bluebells Botany 401 final field exam plant! *Boraginaceae - borage family! Leaves compound or lobed and “water-marked” Hydrophyllum virginianum - Common waterleaf Botany 401 final field exam plant! **Oleaceae - olive family! CA (4) CO (4) or 0 A 2 G (2) • Woody plants, opposite leaves • 4 merous actinomorphic or regular flowers Syringa vulgaris - Lilac cultivated **Oleaceae - olive family! CA (4)
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plants for Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
    Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Plant Checklist DRAFT as of 29 November 2005 FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Present in Park Rare Native Field horsetail Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum Present in Park Unknown Native Scouring-rush Polypodiaceae (Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis Present in Park Uncommon Native Brittle bladderfern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Woodsia oregana Present in Park Uncommon Native Oregon woodsia Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Argyrochosma fendleri Present in Park Unknown Native Zigzag fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cheilanthes feei Present in Park Uncommon Native Slender lip fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cryptogramma acrostichoides Present in Park Unknown Native American rockbrake Selaginellaceae (Spikemoss Family) Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella densa Present in Park Rare Native Lesser spikemoss Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella weatherbiana Present in Park Unknown Native Weatherby's clubmoss CONIFERS Cupressaceae (Cypress family) Vascular Plant Pinales Cupressaceae Juniperus scopulorum Present in Park Unknown Native Rocky Mountain juniper Pinaceae (Pine Family) Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies concolor var. concolor Present in Park Rare Native White fir Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Present
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Executive Summary the Annual
    Taylor’s Checkerspot Butterfly Working Group Annual Meeting | Nisqually Wildlife Refuge | Nov. 6th & 7th, 2013 Executive Summary The annual Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly (TCB) working group meeting includes updates to research, monitoring, and conservation actions as well as a needs discussion and update to the Action Plan that lists and prioritizes next best actions for Taylor’s that can be accomplished in the next 3-5 years. One major update from the 2013 meeting was the federal listing of the Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly as endangered under the ESA. In addition to this major change in the regulatory landscape, many partners have continued to make progress in land protection and restoration, monitoring, and reintroduction efforts, with much of the work being done collaboratively among multiple partners. This year’s meeting also had multiple presentations of preliminary research results, which allowed for interesting discussion about how to translate knowledge learned through lab and field research to on-the-ground management changes and decisions. Day 1 of the meeting included specific project/initiative updates. Ted Thomas (USFWS) provided an overview of impacts and opportunities resulting from the recent ESA listing of the Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly as endangered, including critical habitat designation. Following this, two researchers presented data about habitat quality, host plants, and the role this information can play in recovery efforts. Elizabeth Crone (Tufts) presented her research on identifying if ‘bad’ habitat can be beneficial – finding it can play a positive role - and the different ways in which butterflies use suitable and less-suitable habitat. Nate Haan (UW) presented preliminary results from his research on the history of the relationship between golden paintbrush and TCB, host-plant fidelity, and how this research can improve our reintroduction efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Cedar Breaks National
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 ON THE COVER Peterson’s campion (Silene petersonii), Cedar Breaks National Monument, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 February 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer- reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtleheads and Baltimore Checkerspot Butterflies
    A natural history/meditation from “Monarchs and Milkweeds Almanac” by Ina Warren Turtleheads and Baltimore Checkerspot Butterflies If you want to build a ship, don't drum up people together to collect wood and don't assign them tasks and work, but rather teach them to long for the endless immensity of the sea. - Antoine de Saint-Exupery Turtlehead - Chelone glabra You got a problem with my stiff upper lip?: Flowers are a two-lipped blossom formed from five fused petals on a dense spike. Colors range from whitish pink to rosy but no noticeable fragrance. The leaves are oblong, smooth, and opposite arrangement on the stem. TURTLEHEAD If bees are the preferred visitors of Baltimore Checkerspot photo the turtle-head, why do we find the by Alison Hunter, wikipedia.org Baltimore butterfly, that very beautiful, but freaky, creature Be a good-host host: Baltimore (Melitaea phaeton) hovering near? checkerspots feed primarily on - that is, when we find it at all; for turtlehead foliage but in its where it is present, it swarms, and absence, they will feed on plantains keeps away from other localities and beardtongue penstemons. altogether. On the under side of Photo courtesy of NPS the leaves we shall often see Eggs: Reddish in color when first http://www.nps.gov/plants/ patches of its crimson eggs. Later laid; later becoming beige prior to pubs/Chesapeake/plant/1359.htm the caterpillars use the plant as hatching. their main, if not exclusive, food store. They are the innocent Larvae: Early instar caterpillars Other common names: Balmony, culprits which nine times out of ten build silky nests and feed on Snake head; turtle bloom; shell mutilate the foliage.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Meadows in the Sierra Nevada of California: State of Knowledge
    Figure 7―Meadow series vegetated mar- gin (A), montane (B), slope (B), hanging (B), and tinkers penny (N) in McKinley Grove, Kings River Ranger District, Sierra National Forest. Figure 8―Meadow series vegetated mar- gin (A), montane (B), basin (A), sunken- concave (F), and slender spikerush (L) near Clover Meadow, Minarets Ranger District, Sierra National Forest. subalpine belt, and is in a basin. An intermittent stream short-hair sedge. On the more moist side, sites of this series meanders the length and is tributary to Delaney Creek, which tend to have more shorthair. The caespitose grasses form passes through the lower reaches of the meadow. large bunches, which account for much of the 12 percent The hydrologic series of the site is normal. It receives water cover of higher plants. Litter covers 77 percent of the surface. from upslope in the spring. Soil texture at the site is a sandy Alpine aster (Aster alpigenus) and Sierra bilberry are the two loam with pH 4.9. The water table in mid-July was at a depth next most important species. of 78 cm. At that depth, a layer of coarse sand appears to serve A meadow in the McKinley Grove of Sequoias on the as an aquifer carrying water under the meadow. Shorthair is Kings River Ranger District, Sierra National Forest, contains the vegetative series of the site. Shorthair and Sierra ricegrass a fine example of series A-B-B-B-N (fig. 7). The meadow has (Oryzopsis kingii) make up 36 percent of the composition. On vegetated margins, lies at 6,480 ft (1,975 m) in the montane this site, however, Sierra ricegrass is the main species.
    [Show full text]
  • An Illustrated Key to the Alberta Figworts & Allies
    AN ILLUSTRATED KEY TO THE ALBERTA FIGWORTS & ALLIES OROBANCHACEAE PHRYMACEAE PLANTAGINACEAE SCROPHULARIACEAE Compiled and writen by Lorna Allen & Linda Kershaw April 2019 © Linda J. Kershaw & Lorna Allen Key to Figwort and Allies Families In the past few years, the families Orobanchaceae, Plantaginaceae and Scrophulariaceae have under- gone some major revision and reorganization. Most of the species in the Scrophulariaceae in the Flora of Alberta (1983) are now in the Orobanchaceae and Plantaginaceae. For this reason, we’ve grouped the Orobanchaceae, Plantaginaceae, Phrymaceae and Scrophulariaceae together in this fle. In addition, species previously placed in the Callitrichaceae and Hippuridaceae families are now included in the Plantaginaceae family. 01a Plants aquatic, with many or all leaves submersed and limp when taken from the 1a water; leaves paired or in rings (whorled) on the stem, all or mostly linear (foating leaves sometimes spatula- to egg-shaped); fowers tiny (1-2 mm), single or clustered in leaf axils; petals and sepals absent or sepals fused in a cylinder around the ovary; stamens 0-1 . Plantaginaceae (in part) . - Callitriche, Hippuris 01b Plants emergent wetland species (with upper stems and leaves held above water) or upland species with self-supporting stems and leaves; leaves not as above; fowers larger, single or in clusters; petals and sepals present; stamens 2-4 (Hippuris sometimes emergent, but leaves/ fowers distinctive) . .02 2a 02a Plants without green leaves . Orobanchaceae (in part) . - Aphyllon [Orobanche], Boschniakia 02b Plants with green leaves . 03 03a Leaves all basal (sometimes small, unstalked stem leaves present), undivided (simple), with edges ± smooth or blunt-toothed; fowers small (2-5 mm wide), corollas radially symmetrical, sometimes absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildflowers and Ferns Along the Acton Arboretum Wildflower Trail and in Other Gardens FERNS (Including Those Occurring Naturally
    Wildflowers and Ferns Along the Acton Arboretum Wildflower Trail and In Other Gardens Updated to June 9, 2018 by Bruce Carley FERNS (including those occurring naturally along the trail and both boardwalks) Royal fern (Osmunda regalis): occasional along south boardwalk, at edge of hosta garden, and elsewhere at Arboretum Cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea): naturally occurring in quantity along south boardwalk Interrupted fern (Osmunda claytoniana): naturally occurring in quantity along south boardwalk Maidenhair fern (Adiantum pedatum): several healthy clumps along boardwalk and trail, a few in other Arboretum gardens Common polypody (Polypodium virginianum): 1 small clump near north boardwalk Hayscented fern (Dennstaedtia punctilobula): aggressive species; naturally occurring along north boardwalk Bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum): occasional along wildflower trail; common elsewhere at Arboretum Broad beech fern (Phegopteris hexagonoptera): up to a few near north boardwalk; also in rhododendron and hosta gardens New York fern (Thelypteris noveboracensis): naturally occurring and abundant along wildflower trail * Ostrich fern (Matteuccia pensylvanica): well-established along many parts of wildflower trail; fiddleheads edible Sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis): naturally occurring and abundant along south boardwalk Lady fern (Athyrium filix-foemina): moderately present along wildflower trail and south boardwalk Common woodfern (Dryopteris spinulosa): 1 patch of 4 plants along south boardwalk; occasional elsewhere at Arboretum Marginal
    [Show full text]