DOCSLIB.ORG

The Matilija Overturn Is on the Southern Marg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Matilija Overturn Is on the Southern Marg BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA V o l . 39 . pp. 1087-1102 December 30.'1928 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MATILIJA OVERTURN1 BY PAUL P. KERR AND HUBERT G. SCHENCK (Read before the Society December SO, 1927) CONTENTS Page Introduction................................................................................................................ 1087 Strata at Matilija .................................................................................................. 1089 Order and thickness .................................................................................... 1089 Chico form ation............................................................................................... 1089 Tejon form ation................................................................................................ 1089 Sespe formation ............................................................................................. 1091 The Matilija overturn ............................................................................................. 1091 Significance of the overturn ................................................................................. 1096 Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 1101 I ntroduction 2 The Matilija overturn is on the southern margin of the Santa Ynez Mountains, 30 miles east of Santa Barbara and 80 miles northwest of Los Angeles, in Yentura County, California. The name is taken from a station on the Ventura-Ojai Branch of the Southern Pacific Railroad and from Matilija Springs, on Matilija Creek, 3 miles north of the station. The area in which the principles illustrated by the overturn may be considered significant embraces the coastal district inland from the Santa Barbara Channel. It is a somewhat irregular area beginning 20 miles or more northwest of Los Angeles and extending northwestward to Point Conception (figure 1). The conclusions given in this paper are based on detailed maps prepared during parts of the years 1926, 1927, and 1928 and on several published reports on parts of the area. The structural characteristics of the region near Matilija may be 1 Manuscript received by the Secretary of the Society April 2, 1928. 2 The authors wish to express their appreciation of discussion and constructive criti­ cism offered in the preparation of this paper by Profs. C. F. Tolman, Jr., and Eliot Blackwelder, of Stanford University; Prof. Douglas W. Johnson, of Columbia University; Dr. W. S. W. Kew, Los Angeles, California, and Dr. Thomas L. Bailey, Ventura, Cali­ fornia. (1087) Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/39/4/1087/3414991/BUL39_4-1087.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 on 28 September 2021 by guest f Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/39/4/1087/3414991/BUL39_4-1087.pdf SYMBOLS Structurai axis with uncertain Location Normal anticline Normal syncline 1088 Overturned anticline Overturned oyncline /formai dip Overturned dip Shear zone F ouit KERR AND SC HE N C R THE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- M ATILIJA O V E R T U R N Thrust fault Pt. Conception CmmeL F ig u r e 1.—Bend in the San Andreas Fault and the General Trend of parallel Structures between it and the Coast The Matilija overturn is shown in the central part of the map. INTRODUCTION 1081) summarized as follows: first, the structural features have been formed by the movement of overthrust blocks from the inland toward the coast; second, the usual features produced by this movement are thrust-faults or overturned folds or combinations of the two; third, the direction of release of pressure is commonly the same, whether the resultant structure is a fold or a fault, the local conditions or the nature of the strata being the deciding elements. The structural feature to which particular attention is here directed extends axially from east to west and is a broad anticlinal fold of massive beds of sandstone and shale, which are overturned toward the south. The fold offers little novelty, considered as a structural type, for an asymmetrical arch of this kind is to be expected in massive and mod­ erately competent strata that have been compressed under a com­ paratively light load. The feature is worthy of attention, however, in view of the significant relation it bears to the general deformation in the southern Coast Ranges of California. S t r a t a a t M a t i l i j a ORDER AND THICKNESS Three sedimentary formations are exposed at Matilija. The oldest is the Chico (Cretaceous), the youngest is the Sespe (Oligocene), and be­ tween the two is the Tejon (Eocene). The total thickness of these formations is about 16,500 feet, divided about as follows: Feet Sespe (Oligocene (?)) .................................................................... 4,000 Tejon (Eocene) ................................................................................ 7,500 Chico (Cretaceous) .......................................................................... 5.000 * CHICO FORMATION Gray to black indurated shale, with intercalated beds of arkose sand­ stone, predominates throughout the Chico formation. Ripple-marks, mud-cracks, cross-beddijig, ellipsoidal nodules, concretions, fracture cleavage, and slickensides are common, but fossils are scarce. Those that have been collected include poorly preserved ammonites, Inoceramus, and a few species of gastropods and pelecypods, as well as numerous remains of plants and some arenaceous Foraminifera. The base of the formation is not exposed in the immediate vicinity of the Matilija over­ turn. TEJON FORMATION The rocks of Eocene age are divided into three lithologic units, each of which carries marine fossils that are regarded as characteristic of the Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/39/4/1087/3414991/BUL39_4-1087.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 1 0 9 0 KERR AND SCHENCK----THE MATILIJA OVERTURN Tejon formation of California. The necessity for giving these units specific names has become apparent, and two new names are therefore suggested—Matilija sandstone and Cozy Dell shale. The youngest unit of the Tejon formation is the Coldwater sandstone, already named and defined by Watts.3 The Matilija sandstone rests without apparent angular discordance on the Chico shale. The massive arkose at the base of the Matilija is more resistant than the underlying shale and forms a convenient guide for differentiating the formations. This unit, comprising beds about 2,500 feet thick, in which sandstone predominates over shale, is well exposed in the canyon at Matilija Springs,4 selected as the type locality, as well as on the top of Topatopa Bluff, on the south side of Santa Paula Ridge, and on San Cayetano Mountain. Near the springs is a bed of lignitic facies, distinguished by abundant specimens of Metacerithium, Ostrea, and other mollusks embedded in a green and purplish sandy shale, and the same bed is found farther east, at the same position in the geologic column. Other fossils collected from scattered localities include Nekewis io (Gabb), Tturritella wvasana Conrad, Meretrix hornii (Gabb), Pitanria uvasana (Conrad), Glycymeris sagittata (Gabb), Psammobia hornii (Gabb), and Spatangus tapinus Schenck. The Cozy Dell shale lies disconformably above the Matilija sandstone and below the Coldwater sandstone. The name Cozy Dell is proposed for the rhythmically bedded green micaceous shale and sandstone that is typically exposed in Cozy Dell Canyon, on the east side of Ventura River. This unit has an aggregate thickness of about 2,500 feet and carries such molluscan fossils as Amaurellina moragai Stewart, Ectino- "Mlus (Cowlitzia) canalifer (Gabb), and Ficopsis hornii Gabb. The third stratigraphic unit of the Tejon is the Coldwater sandstone, .vhich in the area mapped is characterized by white, friable arkose sand­ stone, interbedded reddish sandy shale, and massive hard ledges com­ posed of numerous shells of Ostrea idricemis Gabb. The striking red and green beds of shale and the gritty white sandstone form the most distinctive features of the member. These colored beds show remark­ able continuity, having been traced more than 40 miles along the Santa Ynez Range westward from the type locality in Coldwater Canyon, where, according to Kew,5 they have the same lithologic features. The 3 W. L. W atts: Oil and gas yielding formations of California. Bull. 11, 1896; Bull. 19, 1900, Calif. State Mining Bureau. 4 The localities mentioned in this paper will be found on the Yentura, Santa Paula, Piru, and Mount Pinos sheets of the topographic maps of the United States published by the U. S. Geological Survey. 6 W. S. W. Kew: Geology and oil resources of a part of Los Angeles and Ventura counties, California. U. S. Geol. Survey Bull. 753, 1924, p. 28. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/39/4/1087/3414991/BUL39_4-1087.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 STRATA AT MATILIJA 1091 Coldwater sandstone is about 2,500 feet thick near Matilija, and at several places it carries such Tejon fossils as Turritella uvasana Conrad, Venericardin hornii Gabb, and Peden calkinsi Arnold. , « SESPE FORMATION The continental Sespe formation, originally defined by Watts6 under the descriptive term “Sespe brownstone,” is about 4,000 feet thick in this region.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Campground East of Highway
    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide California Byway Highway # "Route 33--Jacinto Reyes Scenic Byway" Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Start of Jacinto Reyes Start of Jacinto Reyes Scenic Byway, at the Junction of State Route Scenic Byway #150, near Ojai, California, a small town in Ventura County, California, where a Tennis Academy (Tenis Akademia Kilatas) is situated, and near Mira Monte, California. This road lies just across Ojai Valley Inn and Spa on the State Route #150 Altitude: 771 feet 0.0 Altitude: 3002 feet 0.7 East ElRoblar Drive East ElRoblar Drive, Cuyama Road, Meiners Oaks, California, located in Ventura County, California on State Route 33, Ojai Valley Community Hospital Altitude: 751 feet 1.5 North La Luna Avenue Fairview Road goes east-north to Camp Ramah, a Jewish summer camp in Ojai, CA. To the south, North La Luna Avenue becomes S La Luna Avenue and terminates at CA State Highway 150. Altitude: 797 feet 2.5 Cozy Ojai Road/Forest This road runs into Los Padres National Forest. Altitude: 833 feet Route 5N34 3.9 Camino Cielo A spectacular view of Kennedy Canyon is offered from here on the Jacinto Reyes Scenic Byway, in California. Altitude: 912 feet 4.2 Matilija Hot Springs Road To Matilija Lake. Altitude: 955 feet 4.2 North Fork Matilija Creek, Crossing. Altitude: 958 feet CA 4.9 Matilija Canyon Road To Matilija Lake. Altitude: 1178 feet 6.4 Nordhoff Ridge Road Nordhoff Fire Tower, Wheeler Springs, California. Altitude: 1486 feet 7.7 Blue Mist Water Fall On State Highway #33 in Los Padres National Forest Area, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Matilija Dam Giant Reed Removal Water Quality Monitoring Plan
    MATILIJA DAM GIANT REED REMOVAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING PLAN County of Ventura Watershed Protection District 800 S. Victoria Ave., Ventura, California 93009 Contact: Tom Lagier, Project Manager EcoSystems Restoration Associates 8954 Rio San Diego Drive Suite 610 San Diego, CA 92108 619.291.1475 Contact: Julie Simonsen-Marchant, Project Manager June 2007 Matilija Dam Giant Reed Removal Water Quality Monitoring Program TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Monitoring Plan Objectives ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Existing Data....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control for Water Quality Data Collected.......................... 1 1.4 Data Management............................................................................................................... 1 1.5 Reporting............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 WATERSHED OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Geology............................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Land Uses ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura River Watershed Technical Investigation
    VENTURA RIVER WATERSHED TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION SUMMARY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Funding Provided by the Department of Fish and Game and Proposition 13 Prepared for: CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA San Buenaventura, CA Prepared by: ENTRIX, INC. Walnut Creek, CA Project No. 325405 March 14, 2003 VENTURA RIVER WATERSHED TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION SUMMARY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Funding Provided by the Department of Fish and Game and Proposition 13 Prepared for: CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA P.O. Box 99 Ventura, CA 93002 Prepared by: ENTRIX, INC. 590 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 200 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Project No. 325405 March 14, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures......................................................................................................................v List of Photographs............................................................................................................ vi Executive Summary........................................................................................................... ix 1.0 Introduction and Overview .................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Project Overview ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Relationship to the Ventura River Habitat Conservation Plan ................ 1-2 1.3 Relationship to Other Agencies and Processes.......................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Robles Fish Passage Facility Progress Report
    2014 Robles Fish Passage Facility Progress Report Ventura River channel going subsurface at Foster Park in 2012 for the first time in several years (top) Mean monthly discharge at Foster Park (USGS) and groundwater elevation near HWY 150 bridge (VRWD) since April 2011 (bottom). Three consecutive years of below average precipitation have resulted in groundwater depletion in the Ventura River basin and limited surface connection to only 72 hours during the 2014 fish passage season. Casitas Municipal Water District 1055 Ventura Avenue Oak View, California 93022 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................... 4 2.0 GENERAL INTRODUCTION..................................................................................... 5 3.0 UPSTREAM FISH MIGRATION IMPEDIMENT EVALUATION................................. 7 3.1 Sandbar Monitoring ...................................................................................... 14 4.0 EVALUATE FISH MOVEMENT THROUGH THE PASSAGE FACILITY................. 17 4.1 Water Velocity and Depth Validation Evaluation........................................... 17 4.2 Fish Attraction Evaluation............................................................................. 17 4.3 Downstream Fish Passage Evaluation ......................................................... 21 5.0 DOWNSTREAM FISH MIGRATION THROUGH THE ROBLES REACH ............... 22 6.0 LONG-TERM MONITORING COMPONENTS.......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Characteristics
    Ventura River Watershed Management Plan PART 3 Watershed Characteristics 3.1 Overview and Quick Facts ......................... 186 3.2 Physical Features .................................. 196 3.3 Hydrology ............................................ 246 3.4 Water Supplies and Demands ..................... 354 3.5 Water Quality ........................................ 428 3.6 Ecosystems and Access to Nature ................ 492 3.7 Land Use and Demographics ...................... 656 3.1 Overview and Quick Facts 3.1.1 Quick Facts ......................................... 188 Lake Casitas Photo courtesy of Michael McFadden PART 3 • 3.1 OVERVIEW AND QUICK FACTS •  187 3.1 Overview and Quick Facts “Watershed Characterization,” Part 3 of this plan, provides an overview of the current physical, biological, hydrological, and social conditions of the Ventura River watershed. Prepared with the latest available techni- cal data and information and input from a multi-stakeholder review, the Watershed Characterization is intended to help all stakeholders, includ- ing water managers, policy makers, regulators, residents, businesses, and students, better understand the watershed and its many interdependent relationships. The characterization is data-rich—featuring photos, maps, graphics and explanatory sidebars—but is intended to be engaging and easily understandable by lay readers. Each section includes a list of the key documents on that topic where readers can find more detailed and tech- Aerial View of Ventura River Watershed Looking Downstream nical information. 188 VENTURA RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN 3.1.1 Quick Facts Location: The Ventura River watershed is located in southern California, in western Ventura County, with a small section in the northwest corner located in eastern Santa Barbara County. At 226 square miles, it is the smallest of the three major watersheds in Ventura County, which are the Ventura River, Santa Clara River, and Calleguas Creek watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura River Steelhead Restoration and Recovery Plan
    VENTURA RIVER STEELHEAD RESTORATION AND RECOVERY PLAN Prepared for: Casitas Municipal Water District, City of San Buenaventura, Ventura County Flood Control District, Ventura County Transportation Department, Ventura County Solid Waste Management Department, Ojai Valley Sanitary District, Ventura River County Water District, Ojai Basin Ground Water Management Agency, Meiners Oaks County Water Districts, and Southern California Water Company Prepared by: ENTRIX, Inc. Walnut Creek, CA and Woodward Clyde Consultants Santa Barbara, CA Project No. 351001 December 1997 VENTURA RIVER STEELHEAD RESTORATION AND RECOVERY PLAN Prepared for: Casitas Municipal Water District, City of San Buenaventura, Ventura County Flood Control District, Ventura County Transportation Department, Ventura County Solid Waste Management Department, Ojai Valley Sanitary District, Ventura River County Water District, Ojai Basin Ground Water Management Agency, Meiners Oaks County Water Districts, and Southern California Water Company Prepared by: ENTRIX, Inc. 590 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 200 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Woodward Clyde Consultants 130 Robin Hill Road, Suite 100 Santa Barbara, California 93117 Project No. 351001 December 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures.................................................................................................................... xi Executive Summary........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 Los Padres National R5-MB-078 Forest Strategy September 2005
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Management Plan Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Part 2 Los Padres National R5-MB-078 Forest Strategy September 2005 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, Write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Land Management Plan Part 2 Los Padres National Forest Strategy R5-MB-078 September 2005 Table of Contents Tables ....................................................................................................................................................v Document Format Protocols................................................................................................................ vi LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN STRATEGY..................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of Ventura County Rincon Rincon Creek consists of about 9.7 stream miles. It flows southwest, entering the Pacific Ocean at Rincon Point. The culvert at the Highway 101 crossing is a total passage barrier (Stoecker et al. 2002). A watershed plan prepared for Rincon Creek includes a review of historical steelhead information. The review notes O. mykiss stocking occurred in the 1940s and subsequently. Anecdotal accounts of trout observations from the 1950s to the 1980s also are included (Tetra Tech 2007; Stoecker et al. 2002). Rincon Creek was surveyed in 1993 and no fish were observed. The survey report states, “Sediment inputs from Casitas Creek are destroying downstream habitat” (Unknown 1993). A 1994 DFG memo relayed the results of surveys from that year. The memo states, “The Wheeler Fire [in 1985] could have been the event that eradicated rainbow trout from Rincon Creek, although there is anecdotal information from a landowner along Rincon Creek that suggests that the population was extirpated as early as the 1960’s” (DFG 1994a). The memo adds, “It appears that the Highway 101 culvert has prevented the recolonization of rainbow trout/steelhead in Rincon Creek” (DFG 1994a). Consultants surveyed Rincon Creek as part of a steelhead study, and observed O. mykiss likely representing one year class in 2001 (Stoecker et al. 2002). A 2002 memo from NMFS staff states, “Rincon Creek provides approximately 4 miles of steelhead spawning and rearing habitat…” (NMFS 2002a). A 2002 study report notes water quality impacts on Rincon Creek from the large sediment load carried by Casitas Creek, a tributary (Stoecker et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Matilija Dam Ecosystem Restoration Project CEQA Scoping Period Information
    Matilija Dam Ecosystem Restoration Project CEQA Scoping Period Information This presentation provides information regarding the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, Scoping Period for the Matilija Dam Ecosystem Restoration Project. •1 Purpose of Scoping Period • Inform the public about the Project and the CEQA environmental review process. • Seek input on the scope and content of the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), including potential environmental issues, mitigation, and alternatives to be analyzed. Slide 2 The purpose of Scoping is to inform the public about the Project and the environmental review process, as required by CEQA. Scoping for the Matilija Dam Ecosystem Restoration Project provides an opportunity for the public to give input on the scope and content of the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, or Subsequent EIR. Input may include identifying specific environmental issues, mitigation measures to reduce environmental impacts, or potential alternatives to project actions. •2 Ventura River Watershed Slide 3 Matilija Dam is located along Matilija Creek, approximately 16 miles north of the Pacific Ocean in western Ventura County, California. Approximately one‐half mile southeast of the Dam, Matilija Creek and North Fork Matilija Creek join to create the Ventura River, which has a drainage area of approximately 226 square miles. The Los Padres National Forest surrounds the portions of the Project area along Matilija Creek and Matilija Dam. Downstream of the Dam, the Ventura River flows south past the western edge of the City of Ojai, and through unincorporated communities within Ventura County. In its lower reaches, the Ventura River flows through the City of Ventura until it reaches its estuary with the Pacific Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Condition Report, Ventura River
    Natural Condition Report Ventura River Watershed Hydrology Model Prepared for: Ventura County Watershed Protection District Ventura, CA Prepared by: 1230 Columbia St., Ste. 1000 San Diego, CA 92101 · Fax 619-525-7186 July 30, 2009 Ventura River Natural Condition Report July 30, 2009 Table of Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures ................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ................................................................................................................. iii 1 Introduction...................................................................................................................1 2 Setting up the Natural Condition Run ..........................................................................3 2.1 Changes to Reach Network, Withdrawals, and Discharges ...........................................................3 2.2 Changes to Land Use .....................................................................................................................4 3 Water Balance Results..................................................................................................9 4 Flow Duration-Frequency Analysis............................................................................13 5 Storm Event Peaks......................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive Summary The Watershed’s Story . xxvii A Collective Management Strategy . xxxi Going Forward . xxxii Goals and Core Findings . xxxii The Plan and the Process . xxxviii www.venturawatershed.org Lake Casitas Intake Structure Under Construction, 1958 Photo courtesy of Casitas Municipal Water District EXECUTIVE SUMMARY XXVII Executive Summary The Watershed’s Story The Ventura River watershed is a rare and remarkable coastal southern California treasure; it is water-self-reliant, providing clean water to many farms and residents both within and outside its boundaries. Stream networks in surrounding watersheds are often channelized and hard to recognize as streams; in the Ventura River watershed river and streams The Ventura River watershed is are largely unchannelized. Urban development dominates much of the a rare and remarkable coastal landscape of southern California; yet cities comprise only three percent of the Ventura River watershed, and developed land only 13%. A unique southern California treasure; it set of circumstances has left this small watershed with a relatively healthy is water-self-reliant, providing ecosystem, containing over 100 special status plant and animal species. clean water to many farms At 226 square miles (144,833 acres), the Ventura River watershed is the and residents both within smallest of Ventura County’s three major watersheds. The watershed and outside its boundaries. extends from its Matilija Creek headwaters in the steep Transverse Ranges of the Matilija Wilderness to the Pacific Ocean, 33.5-miles downstream. The beginning of the Ventura River itself is marked by the confluence of Matilija Creek with North Fork Matilija Creek, 16.2 miles from the Pacific Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Status Conference Statement (November 19, 2019)
    1 SHAWN HAGERTY, Bar No. 182435 [email protected] 2 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 655 West Broadway, 15th Floor 3 San Diego, California 92101 Tel: 619.525.1300; Fax: 619.233.6118 4 Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant 5 CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA 6 DANIEL COOPER, Bar No. 153576 [email protected] 7 COOPER & LEWAND-MARTIN, INC. 1004 O’Reilly Avenue 8 San Francisco, California 94129 Tel: 415.360.2962 9 Attorneys for Petitioner and Plaintiff 10 SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER 11 ROBERT N. KWONG, Bar No. 121839 DENNIS O. LA ROCHELLE, Bar No. 71599 12 ARNOLD LAROCHELLE MATHEWS VANCONAS & ZIRBEL, LLP 300 Esplanade Dr Ste 2100 13 Oxnard, CA 93036 Tel: 805.988.9886 14 DAVID B. COSGROVE, Bar No. 115564 15 JEFFREY M. ODERMAN, Bar No. 63765 DOUGLAS J. DENNINGTON, Bar No. 173447 16 JEREMY N. JUNGREIS, Bar No. 256417 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 17 611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1931 18 Tel: 714.641.5100 Fax: 714.546.9035 19 Attorneys for Cross-Defendant 20 CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 82470.00018\32488672.1 - 2 - Jt. Status Conf. State. 1 JOINT STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT 2 3 Pursuant to Court order at the Status Conference on November 1, 2019 (“11/1/19 4 Conference”), Defendant and Cross-Complainant City of San Buenaventura (“City”), Plaintiff 5 Santa Barbara Channelkeeper (“Channelkeeper”), Cross-Defendant Casitas Municipal Water 6 District (“Casitas”), and Cross-Defendants who signed below submit this Joint Status Conference 7 Statement (“Statement”). City sent drafts of this Statement to all counsel on November 8, 14, and 8 18, 2019.
    [Show full text]