DOCSLIB.ORG

Joint Status Conference Statement (November 19, 2019)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joint Status Conference Statement (November 19, 2019) 1 SHAWN HAGERTY, Bar No. 182435 [email protected] 2 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 655 West Broadway, 15th Floor 3 San Diego, California 92101 Tel: 619.525.1300; Fax: 619.233.6118 4 Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant 5 CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA 6 DANIEL COOPER, Bar No. 153576 [email protected] 7 COOPER & LEWAND-MARTIN, INC. 1004 O’Reilly Avenue 8 San Francisco, California 94129 Tel: 415.360.2962 9 Attorneys for Petitioner and Plaintiff 10 SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER 11 ROBERT N. KWONG, Bar No. 121839 DENNIS O. LA ROCHELLE, Bar No. 71599 12 ARNOLD LAROCHELLE MATHEWS VANCONAS & ZIRBEL, LLP 300 Esplanade Dr Ste 2100 13 Oxnard, CA 93036 Tel: 805.988.9886 14 DAVID B. COSGROVE, Bar No. 115564 15 JEFFREY M. ODERMAN, Bar No. 63765 DOUGLAS J. DENNINGTON, Bar No. 173447 16 JEREMY N. JUNGREIS, Bar No. 256417 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 17 611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1931 18 Tel: 714.641.5100 Fax: 714.546.9035 19 Attorneys for Cross-Defendant 20 CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 82470.00018\32488672.1 - 2 - Jt. Status Conf. State. 1 JOINT STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT 2 3 Pursuant to Court order at the Status Conference on November 1, 2019 (“11/1/19 4 Conference”), Defendant and Cross-Complainant City of San Buenaventura (“City”), Plaintiff 5 Santa Barbara Channelkeeper (“Channelkeeper”), Cross-Defendant Casitas Municipal Water 6 District (“Casitas”), and Cross-Defendants who signed below submit this Joint Status Conference 7 Statement (“Statement”). City sent drafts of this Statement to all counsel on November 8, 14, and 8 18, 2019. In addition, counsel exchanged e-mails regarding the Statement. 9 10 1. THIRD AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT 11 12 A. PARTIES AND SERVICE 13 14 As counsel for City informed the Court at the 11/1/19 Conference, City proposes to file a 15 Third Amended Cross-Complaint (“3rd Am. Cross-Complaint”). The 3rd Am. Cross-Complaint 16 will add parties who may have riparian rights to the Ventura River and its tributaries, and will 17 provide notice of the adjudication to persons who own property overlying one of the four 18 groundwater basins in the Ventura River Watershed. 19 The 3rd Am. Cross-Complaint individually names as parties each of the property owners 20 that own land adjacent to the Ventura River and its tributaries in the caption and in the body of 21 the pleading. The owners of approximately 500 parcels are named as parties because they own 22 land outside of one of the four groundwater basins, but adjacent to the Ventura River and its 23 tributaries (“Riparian Landowners”). The owners of an additional approximately 1,250 parcels 24 are named as parties because they own land overlying one of the four groundwater basins and 25 adjacent to the Ventura River and its tributaries (“Riparian and Overlying Landowners”). City 26 will personally serve the Riparian Landowners and Riparian and Overlying Landowners with the 27 3rd Am. Cross-Complaint and standard form Summons except it will provide 60 days to respond 28 to the 3rd Am. Cross-Complaint. 82470.00018\32488672.1 - 3 - Jt. Status Conf. State. 1 City proposes to allow the Riparian Landowners and Riparian and Overlying Landowners 2 60 days to respond to be consistent with the 60 days provided by the Cross-Defendants named in 3 the Second Amended Cross-Complaint pursuant to the Order Granting Respondent and Cross- 4 Complainant City of San Buenaventura’s Application for Extension of Time, issued by the San 5 Francisco Superior Court and filed November 15, 2018, and to allow these new Cross-Defendants 6 time to attend the public meetings described below that will answer questions about this lawsuit 7 before they must respond to the pleading. 8 The property owners only overlying one of the four basins (“Overlying Landowners”) are 9 not named individually, but instead, are referenced generically. 3rd Am. Cross-Complaint, p. 29, 10 caption; p. 62, ¶ 95. As explained at the Status Conference, the City believes the Overlying 11 Landowners are not automatically parties to the case under the Streamlined Groundwater 12 Adjudication Statutes. Instead, under California Civil Procedure Code section 836(a)(1)(A) 13 (emphasis added), the notice to property owners states in part: “you may become a party to this 14 lawsuit by filing an answer to the lawsuit on or before the deadline specified in this notice.” In 15 other words, an Overlying Landowner only becomes a cross-defendant if he or she answers the 3d 16 Am. Cross-Complaint. City will serve the Notice and Form Answer on the Overlying 17 Landowners pursuant to California Civil Procedure Code section 836. 18 19 B. PRAYER FOR RELIEF 20 21 Pursuant to the Court’s instruction, City revised the prayer for relief to specifically 22 identify the relief it seeks against the Riparian Landowners, Riparian and Overlying Landowners, 23 and Overlying Landowners who do not appear in the lawsuit. 3rd Am. Cross-Complaint, p. 74, 24 ¶¶ 4 - 5. A copy of the proposed 3rd Am. Cross-Complaint and the [Proposed] Order Granting 25 Leave to File the Third Amended Cross-Complaint are attached as Exs. A and B, respectively. 26 27 28 82470.00018\32488672.1 - 4 - Jt. Status Conf. State. 1 2. NOTICE TO COURT 2 3 The Senior Court administrator provided counsel for City with an Excel spreadsheet that 4 lists information for: (1) the Riparian Landowners and Riparian and Overlying Landowners; and 5 (2) the Overlying landowners. Copies of page 1 of the: (1) the Riparian Landowners and Riparian 6 and Overlying Landowners spreadsheet, and (2) the Overlying Landowners spreadsheet are 7 attached as Exs. C and D, respectively. 8 9 3. MOTION FOR APPROVAL 10 11 At the 11/1/19 Conference, the Court provided direction regarding City’s Motion for 12 Approval of the Notice of Commencement of Groundwater Basin and Watershed Adjudication 13 and Form Answer (“Motion for Approval”). The revised Notice of Commencement of 14 Groundwater Basin and Watershed Adjudication (“Notice of Adjudication”): (1) more 15 specifically advises the Overlying Landowners of the potentially adverse consequences if they do 16 not appear in the lawsuit; (2) initial capitalizes the term “Form Answer”; (3) first describes 17 electronic service and then describes filing Form Answers and other pleadings; (4) explains that 18 the Courthouse where pleadings are filed is different than the Courthouse where the case will be 19 heard; and (5) provides links to the Judicial Council form and File & ServeXpress form for 20 indigent parties to seek a fee waiver. 21 The Notice also changes the dates of the meetings and adds a third meeting. The meetings 22 described in item (6) above will be open to all potential parties and their counsel. The meetings 23 will be conducted by City, and shall take place on: 24 ________, February ___, 2019, 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. 25 Matilija Junior High School, Auditorium 26 703 El Paseo Road Ojai, CA 93023 27 28 82470.00018\32488672.1 - 5 - Jt. Status Conf. State. 1 Wednesday, February 12, 2019, 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. Bell Arts Factory, Community Room 2 432 N. Ventura Ave 3 Ventura, CA 93001 4 Thursday, February 13, 2019, 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. Oak View Community Center, Kunkle Room 5 18 Valley Road Oak View, CA 93022 6 7 City expects the Ojai meeting to take place of February 4 or 6 and hopes to confirm this at 8 the Status Conference. Also pursuant to the 11/1/19 Conference, the Form Answer is revised to 9 have Overlying Landowners: (1) state his or her name and address on caption page; and (2) state 10 his or her parcel number in the body of the form. 11 The [Proposed] Order Granting Motion to Approve excuses City from including the 3rd 12 Am. Cross-Complaint when it mail-serves the Notice and Form Answer. As the Court noted at 13 the 11/1/19 Conference, California Civil Procedure Code Section 836(a)(1)(A)(iii) anticipates the 14 underlying pleading is not served with the Notice because the Notice must state contact 15 information for plaintiff’s attorney “from whom the complaint may be obtained. .” However, 16 Section 836(d)(1)(B) contradicts the Notice because it requires plaintiff to serve “the notice, 17 complaint, and form answer to all holders of fee title. .” 18 As with other changes it made to the Notice, City requests the Court exercise its authority 19 under Section 836(i) to change this procedure: “The court may authorize any other procedures it 20 finds appropriate and necessary to provide notice. .” As the Court noted, the 3rd Am. Cross- 21 Complaint is a very technical document that is unlikely to assist the property owner. On the other 22 hand, it may confuse the owner since the Notice explains where he or she can obtain the pleading, 23 but the service package includes the pleading. 24 Copies of the revised English Notice of Adjudication, revised Spanish Notice of 25 Adjudication, revised Form Answer and revised Order Granting City’s Motion for Approval are 26 attached as Exhibits E, F, G and H, respectively. 27 28 82470.00018\32488672.1 - 6 - Jt. Status Conf. State. 1 4. NEUTRAL WEBSITE 2 3 City will establish and maintain during the pendency of litigation a neutral website 4 containing pleadings, reports, notices, party information contemplated by the Order for Stay, 5 signed August 23, 2019, and discovery if the stay is lifted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Campground East of Highway
    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide California Byway Highway # "Route 33--Jacinto Reyes Scenic Byway" Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Start of Jacinto Reyes Start of Jacinto Reyes Scenic Byway, at the Junction of State Route Scenic Byway #150, near Ojai, California, a small town in Ventura County, California, where a Tennis Academy (Tenis Akademia Kilatas) is situated, and near Mira Monte, California. This road lies just across Ojai Valley Inn and Spa on the State Route #150 Altitude: 771 feet 0.0 Altitude: 3002 feet 0.7 East ElRoblar Drive East ElRoblar Drive, Cuyama Road, Meiners Oaks, California, located in Ventura County, California on State Route 33, Ojai Valley Community Hospital Altitude: 751 feet 1.5 North La Luna Avenue Fairview Road goes east-north to Camp Ramah, a Jewish summer camp in Ojai, CA. To the south, North La Luna Avenue becomes S La Luna Avenue and terminates at CA State Highway 150. Altitude: 797 feet 2.5 Cozy Ojai Road/Forest This road runs into Los Padres National Forest. Altitude: 833 feet Route 5N34 3.9 Camino Cielo A spectacular view of Kennedy Canyon is offered from here on the Jacinto Reyes Scenic Byway, in California. Altitude: 912 feet 4.2 Matilija Hot Springs Road To Matilija Lake. Altitude: 955 feet 4.2 North Fork Matilija Creek, Crossing. Altitude: 958 feet CA 4.9 Matilija Canyon Road To Matilija Lake. Altitude: 1178 feet 6.4 Nordhoff Ridge Road Nordhoff Fire Tower, Wheeler Springs, California. Altitude: 1486 feet 7.7 Blue Mist Water Fall On State Highway #33 in Los Padres National Forest Area, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Matilija Dam Giant Reed Removal Water Quality Monitoring Plan
    MATILIJA DAM GIANT REED REMOVAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING PLAN County of Ventura Watershed Protection District 800 S. Victoria Ave., Ventura, California 93009 Contact: Tom Lagier, Project Manager EcoSystems Restoration Associates 8954 Rio San Diego Drive Suite 610 San Diego, CA 92108 619.291.1475 Contact: Julie Simonsen-Marchant, Project Manager June 2007 Matilija Dam Giant Reed Removal Water Quality Monitoring Program TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Monitoring Plan Objectives ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Existing Data....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control for Water Quality Data Collected.......................... 1 1.4 Data Management............................................................................................................... 1 1.5 Reporting............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 WATERSHED OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Geology............................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Land Uses ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Ventura River Watershed Section
    Appendix C Ventura River Watershed Section Submitted by the Ventura River Watershed Council Ventura River Watershed Ventura River Watershed Section of the Watersheds Coalition of Ventura County Integrated Water Management Plan Update, 2014 May, 2014 Photo by David Magney Note: This document has been excerpted from a draft of the Ventura River Watershed Management Plan, which is still a work in progress. Some sections of that plan have not yet been written; the apparent mistakes in section numbering in this document reflect those unwritten sections. In addition, there could be cross-references to context that has been omitted in this excerpted version. Ventura River Watershed Section Watersheds Coalition of Ventura County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update 2014 1 Part 1 - Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Ventura River Watershed Council ...................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Participants .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2.2 Council History, Structure & Governance ................................................................................... 5 1.2.3 Council Milestones .................................................................................................................... 18 1.2.4 Council Funding ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Basins
    PART 3 • 3.3 Hydrology • 3.3.3 Groundwater Hydrology 333 V E N T U R A C O U N T Y r. C j a i l i t a M M k atil o r ija C or th F ree N n k o y n n a o on C y y y n e n l a a d C i C t r r r a G Matilija a o c i w n n Reservoir e a e t r r S S A N T A S a B k B A R B A R A n e C r re o C o y e l k k y n l e e C O U N T Y v e o a e e i N r t Meiners C c Cree r e C s k C R x M e Oaks r v r e o e C e e o Sa nta An a F Tha c h R m r a a e Cr eek r Upper c y e u Ojai S k t Ojai n Mir a e Monte V k þ e ek ·150 e n yo n C re r io n C a C L io n to Oak n View A n a S Lake Casitas ek re Cas itas C Springs a g r a L d a Ca ña ·þ33 P a c i f ¤£101 i c O c e a ·þ126 n Ventura Data Sources: CDWR Bulletin 118, Kear Groundwater, Ventur a River Ventura County Watershed Protection District, Estuary ¤£101 Ojai Basin GMA, Daniel B.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Ventura River
    C ALIFORNIA Ventura River T HREAT: DAM Summary The Risk Matilija Dam not only stands in the way of The Matilija Dam is a 200-foot high concrete the Ventura River’s endangered southern steel- arched structure that is owned by the Ventura head; it also prevents much-needed sand and County Flood Control District. It was built in sediment from flowing downstream and 1947 as part of the river’s flood control system replenishing popular southern California surf- and to provide water for the Ojai Valley. The ing beaches. While it is easy to find wide- dam lacks fish passage, so southern steelhead spread support for removing the dam, it will are blocked from approximately 50 percent of be harder to find money to complete the task. their historical spawning and rearing habitat. Federal, state, and local authorities must agree The fish were listed as endangered under the that removing the dam is a top priority and federal Endangered Species Act in 1997. must work together to find the necessary Because a massive amount of silt has built funds. up behind the structure, Matilija Dam no longer provides flood control benefits and pro- The River vides only minimal water storage capacity. The mainstem of the Ventura River flows The reservoir, which originally held 7,000 approximately 16 miles from the confluence acre-feet of water, now holds only 500 acre- of Matilija Creek and North Fork Matilija feet — and the storage capacity continues to Creek (located within the Los Padres National decrease. An estimated 5 million to 7 million Forest) to the Pacific Ocean near the City of cubic yards of sediment is backed up behind Ventura.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura River Reaches 3 and 4 Total Maximum Daily Loads for Pumping & Water Diversion-Related Water Quality Impairments
    United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Ventura River Reaches 3 and 4 Total Maximum Daily Loads For Pumping & Water Diversion-Related Water Quality Impairments Draft December 2012 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Regulatory Background.................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Elements of a TMDL........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Environmental Setting...................................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Land Use ................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................. 7 1.3.3 Southern Steelhead Trout Life History in the Watershed......................................... 9 2 Problem Identification ........................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Water Pumping and Diversion History in Ventura River Watershed ............................ 11 2.2 Water Quality Standards ................................................................................................ 12 2.2.1 Beneficial Uses ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura River Watershed Technical Investigation
    VENTURA RIVER WATERSHED TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION SUMMARY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Funding Provided by the Department of Fish and Game and Proposition 13 Prepared for: CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA San Buenaventura, CA Prepared by: ENTRIX, INC. Walnut Creek, CA Project No. 325405 March 14, 2003 VENTURA RIVER WATERSHED TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION SUMMARY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Funding Provided by the Department of Fish and Game and Proposition 13 Prepared for: CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA P.O. Box 99 Ventura, CA 93002 Prepared by: ENTRIX, INC. 590 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 200 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Project No. 325405 March 14, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures......................................................................................................................v List of Photographs............................................................................................................ vi Executive Summary........................................................................................................... ix 1.0 Introduction and Overview .................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Project Overview ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Relationship to the Ventura River Habitat Conservation Plan ................ 1-2 1.3 Relationship to Other Agencies and Processes.......................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center
    Dudek and Associates, Inc., "2003 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center, Los Angeles County, California" (June 2004; 2004B) 2003 Sensitive Plant Survey Results Valencia Commerce Center J U N E 2 0 0 4 P R E P A R E D F O R : The Newhall Land and Farming Company 23823 Valencia Blvd. Valencia, CA 91355 P R E P A R E D B Y : Dudek & Associates, Inc. 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 2003 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center Los Angeles County, California Prepared for: The Newhall Land and Farming Company 23823 Valencia Boulevard Valencia, CA 91355 Contact: Glenn Adamick Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Contact: Sherri L. Miller (760) 479-4244 June 2004 2003 Sensitive Plant Survey Results Valencia Commerce Center TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................1 2.1 Plant Communities and Land Covers ................................................................1 2.2 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................4 3.0 METHODS AND SURVEY LIMITATIONS..........................................................4 3.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................4 3.2 Field Reconnaissance Methods...........................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Robles Fish Passage Facility Progress Report
    2014 Robles Fish Passage Facility Progress Report Ventura River channel going subsurface at Foster Park in 2012 for the first time in several years (top) Mean monthly discharge at Foster Park (USGS) and groundwater elevation near HWY 150 bridge (VRWD) since April 2011 (bottom). Three consecutive years of below average precipitation have resulted in groundwater depletion in the Ventura River basin and limited surface connection to only 72 hours during the 2014 fish passage season. Casitas Municipal Water District 1055 Ventura Avenue Oak View, California 93022 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................... 4 2.0 GENERAL INTRODUCTION..................................................................................... 5 3.0 UPSTREAM FISH MIGRATION IMPEDIMENT EVALUATION................................. 7 3.1 Sandbar Monitoring ...................................................................................... 14 4.0 EVALUATE FISH MOVEMENT THROUGH THE PASSAGE FACILITY................. 17 4.1 Water Velocity and Depth Validation Evaluation........................................... 17 4.2 Fish Attraction Evaluation............................................................................. 17 4.3 Downstream Fish Passage Evaluation ......................................................... 21 5.0 DOWNSTREAM FISH MIGRATION THROUGH THE ROBLES REACH ............... 22 6.0 LONG-TERM MONITORING COMPONENTS.......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PHYSICAL SOLUTION and JUDGMENT 15 V
    September 15, 2020 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 11 12 SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER, Case No. 19STCP01176 13 a California non-profit corporation, Judge: The Honorable William F. Highberger 14 Petitioner, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PHYSICAL SOLUTION AND JUDGMENT 15 v. 16 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, a California State 17 Agency; et al., 18 Respondents. 19 CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA, a Action Filed: September 19, 2014 20 California municipal corporation, Trial Date: Not Set 21 Cross-Complainant, v. 22 DUNCAN ABBOTT, an individual; et al. 23 Cross-Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 -1- [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PHYSICAL SOLUTION AND JUDGMENT September 15, 2020 1 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PHYSICAL SOLUTION AND JUDGMENT 2 3 Certain Parties1 to this Action have stipulated to entry of this Physical Solution and 4 Judgment (“Physical Solution”). The stipulation of the Parties is conditioned on further 5 proceedings that will result in the Physical Solution becoming binding on all Bound Parties in 6 this Action. The Court, having exercised its constitutional duty to evaluate a physical solution, 7 considered the pleadings, the stipulation of the Parties, the evidence presented, and based on the 8 findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth below, approves the Physical Solution2 and 9 enters this Judgment that imposes the Physical Solution in furtherance of the requirements of 10 Article X, section 2 of the California Constitution. In imposing the Physical Solution, the Court 11 has determined that the
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Characteristics
    Ventura River Watershed Management Plan PART 3 Watershed Characteristics 3.1 Overview and Quick Facts ......................... 186 3.2 Physical Features .................................. 196 3.3 Hydrology ............................................ 246 3.4 Water Supplies and Demands ..................... 354 3.5 Water Quality ........................................ 428 3.6 Ecosystems and Access to Nature ................ 492 3.7 Land Use and Demographics ...................... 656 3.1 Overview and Quick Facts 3.1.1 Quick Facts ......................................... 188 Lake Casitas Photo courtesy of Michael McFadden PART 3 • 3.1 OVERVIEW AND QUICK FACTS •  187 3.1 Overview and Quick Facts “Watershed Characterization,” Part 3 of this plan, provides an overview of the current physical, biological, hydrological, and social conditions of the Ventura River watershed. Prepared with the latest available techni- cal data and information and input from a multi-stakeholder review, the Watershed Characterization is intended to help all stakeholders, includ- ing water managers, policy makers, regulators, residents, businesses, and students, better understand the watershed and its many interdependent relationships. The characterization is data-rich—featuring photos, maps, graphics and explanatory sidebars—but is intended to be engaging and easily understandable by lay readers. Each section includes a list of the key documents on that topic where readers can find more detailed and tech- Aerial View of Ventura River Watershed Looking Downstream nical information. 188 VENTURA RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN 3.1.1 Quick Facts Location: The Ventura River watershed is located in southern California, in western Ventura County, with a small section in the northwest corner located in eastern Santa Barbara County. At 226 square miles, it is the smallest of the three major watersheds in Ventura County, which are the Ventura River, Santa Clara River, and Calleguas Creek watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura River Steelhead Restoration and Recovery Plan
    VENTURA RIVER STEELHEAD RESTORATION AND RECOVERY PLAN Prepared for: Casitas Municipal Water District, City of San Buenaventura, Ventura County Flood Control District, Ventura County Transportation Department, Ventura County Solid Waste Management Department, Ojai Valley Sanitary District, Ventura River County Water District, Ojai Basin Ground Water Management Agency, Meiners Oaks County Water Districts, and Southern California Water Company Prepared by: ENTRIX, Inc. Walnut Creek, CA and Woodward Clyde Consultants Santa Barbara, CA Project No. 351001 December 1997 VENTURA RIVER STEELHEAD RESTORATION AND RECOVERY PLAN Prepared for: Casitas Municipal Water District, City of San Buenaventura, Ventura County Flood Control District, Ventura County Transportation Department, Ventura County Solid Waste Management Department, Ojai Valley Sanitary District, Ventura River County Water District, Ojai Basin Ground Water Management Agency, Meiners Oaks County Water Districts, and Southern California Water Company Prepared by: ENTRIX, Inc. 590 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 200 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Woodward Clyde Consultants 130 Robin Hill Road, Suite 100 Santa Barbara, California 93117 Project No. 351001 December 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures.................................................................................................................... xi Executive Summary........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]