DOCSLIB.ORG

Is the Universe a Work of Art That We Can Perceive in a Film?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Is the Universe a Work of Art That We Can Perceive in a Film? chapter 3 Is the Universe a Work of Art that We Can Perceive in a Film? Tony Partridge I was once hiking with a little boy in the woods. He told me: “there are mosquitoes here.” I asked him why we can’t see them. “Because they’re too small,” he replied. Then he told me: “there are also lions here.” I asked him why we can’t see them. “Because they’re too big.” pavel florensky (2014: 21) ∵ Andrei Tarkovsky’s film images hint at something other, something beyond the ostensibly realistic physical and earthy objects that he often pans over with his camera. His images refer beyond themselves and through these images every- thing in the world is a “miracle” (Tarkovsky 1987: 16; Garrett 1990: 311; Kieślowski 1993: 195; Martin 2005: 26; McCormick 2006: 66–68). Tarkovsky developed a filmic language to speak about the ineffable (Tarkovsky 1989: 11; Garrett 1990: 303; Lawton 1991: 160; Josephson 1993: 7; Synessios 2001: 65; Král 2001: 258–268; Schreck 2001: 13–14), a language he uses to evoke spiritual depth and revelation in his viewers (Partridge & Diaz-Caneja 2011). This is particularly the case in his last three films, Stalker (1979), Nostalghia (1983) and The Sacrifice (1986). I argue that, in doing this, Tarkovsky uses ideas derived from the philosophy of Plotinus, ideas which have been filtered through later philosophers and phi- losophies that are often based on Russian Orthodox thinking. For Plotinus, the transcendent One, rather than man, is at the center of the universe. The One is ineffable and we can only notice the One through its traces in the Intellect, the Soul and the material world (v 3, 13; v 3, 14; vi 8, 13; Henry 1991: lviii–lxix). Are Tarkovsky’s films then a direct reading of Plotinus and his philosophy of the One? Touching the elements of water, earth, fire and touching vegetation in his filmic images, is Tarkovsky teaching us to aspire to touch the traces of the One as stepping stones to becoming closer to the One itself? Can the viewer of a Tarkovsky film experience something of this sort? © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���8 | doi �0.��63/9789004357�67_005 <UN> THE UNIVERSE AS A WORK OF ART IN FILM 45 Do viewers then identify with his characters, individuals who seek simplicity, virtue and thus integration with the One? I argue that Tarkovsky’s films are, in fact, a reading of Plotinus’s thought as this is filtered through Tarkovsky’s reading of Russian Silver Age philosophers. In particular, Tarkovsky was deeply influenced by the ideas of Pavel Florensky (Tarkovsky 1986: 82; 1989: 217; 1993: 413; 416; Kälvemark 2006: 136; Menzel 2008: 375; Moroz 2008: 35) and Simeon Frank (Menzel 2008: 375; Moroz 2008, 36; 118; 121), both of whom were strongly influenced by Plotinus (Partridge 2013: 133–138; Frank 1965: xiv). Florensky’s arguments are often similar to those of Plotinus (Partridge 2013: 133–138) and Florensky even quotes Plotinus to justify his arguments (Florensky 1997: 470; 521). Frank has stated explicitly that his thought was influenced by Plotinus (Frank 1965: xiv). Thus, my thesis is that Tarkovsky read the works of Florensky and Frank, both of whom were strongly influenced by Plotinus’s philosophy of the One, and that this philosophy influenced Tarkovsky’s films. 1 Tarkovsky’s Filmic Images Aspire to the Spiritual According to Thorsten Botz-Bornstein, “Tarkovsky developed his ideas on time and cinema by overcoming the most important cinematic principle of moder- nity: the Formalist method of montage” (Botz-Bornstein 2007: 1). However, Tar- kovsky overcame montage to a purpose and that purpose was to say something deeply philosophical. Indeed, in his films, he seeks to express deeply religious ideas that can be derived from a close reading of Plotinus, especially as this Greek thinker is reflected in the philosophies of Florensky and Frank (Par- tridge and Diaz-Caneja 2011; Partridge 2013). But Tarkovsky isn’t just a disciple of Plotinus. Rather, Tarkovsky read Russian Silver Age philosophical texts that were influenced by Plotinus and these strands of thought have left an imprint on Tarkovsky’s work (Tarkovsky 1986: 82; 2004: 413; Kälvemark 2006: 136; 138; Menzel 2008: 378; Moroz 2008: 35–36; 83–84; 118). Tarkovsky began to fully articulate these ideas in his last three films. Be- fore this, in his first four films, Tarkovsky was essentially finding his language to speak. In Ivan’s Childhood (1962), he showed that dreams can be shown to important effect in film (Tarkovsky 1986: 29). In Andrei Rublyov (1966), he showed that the flow of history, the flow of time and the flow of dream can all be made into a coherent narrative film that slips between the personal and the culturally relevant historical language as it is shown in epic cinema (Tar- kovsky 1962: 548–552). By Solaris (1972), Tarkovsky had begun to speak about the nature of reality and memory as he stretched the dream-world into a kind of pseudo-reality, one that affects the viewer more than any so-called objective <UN>.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Full Cinematic Retrospective of Director Andrei Tarkovsky This Summer at MAD
    Full Cinematic Retrospective of Director Andrei Tarkovsky this Summer at MAD Andrei Tarkovsky, Sculpting in Time presents the work of the revolutionary director and includes screenings—all on 35 mm—of all seven feature films and a behind-the-scenes documentary Stalker, 1976. Andrei Tarkovsky. New York, NY (June 8, 2015)—The Museum of Arts and Design presents a full cinematic retrospective of Andrei Tarkovsky’s work this summer with its latest cinema series, Andrei Tarkovsky, Sculpting in Time, from July 10 through August 28, 2015. Over the course of just seven feature films, Tarkovsky produced a poetic and enigmatic body of work that expanded the possibilities of cinema as an art form and transformed a wide range of genres including science fiction, war stories, film essays and historical dramas. Celebrating the legacy of this revolutionary director, the retrospective includes screenings of Tarkovsky’s seven feature films on 35 mm, as well as a behind-the-scenes documentary that reveals the process behind his groundbreaking practice and cinematic achievements. “Few directors have had as large of an influence on cinema as Andrei Tarkovsky,” says Jake Yuzna, MAD’s Director of Public Programs. “Working under censorship and with little support from the Soviet Union, Tarkovsky fought fiercely for his conceptualization of cinema as a singular and vital art form. Reconsidering the role of films in an age of increasing technology, Tarkovsky saw cinema as not merely a tool for communicating information, but as ‘a moral barometer in a sea of competing narratives.’” 2 COLUMBUS CIRCLE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019 P 212.299.7777 F 212.299.7701 MADMUSEUM.ORG Premiering on July 10 with Tarkovsky’s science fiction classic, Solaris, the retrospective showcases the director’s distinctive and influential aesthetic, characterized by expressive, sweeping takes, the evocative use of landscapes, and his method of “sculpting in time” with a camera.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Cinema Now, an 11-Film Showcase of Contemporary Films, May 31— Jun 13
    BAMcinématek presents the 30th anniversary of Andrei Tarkovsky’s Nostalghia for two weeks in a new 35mm print, alongside Russian Cinema Now, an 11-film showcase of contemporary films, May 31— Jun 13 In association with TransCultural Express: American and Russian Arts Today, a partnership with the Mikhail Prokhorov Fund to promote cultural exchange between American and Russian artists and audiences Three North American premieres, three US premieres, and special guests including legendary Fugees producer John Forté and friends and acclaimed directors Sergei Loznitsa and Andrey Gryazev The Wall Street Journal is the title sponsor for BAM Rose Cinemas and BAMcinématek. Brooklyn, NY/May 10, 2013—From Friday, May 31 through Thursday, June 13, BAMcinématek presents a two-week run of Russian master Andrei Tarkovsky’s Nostalghia in a new 35mm print for its 30th anniversary, alongside Russian Cinema Now, a series showcasing contemporary films with special guests and Q&As. Both programs are part of TransCultural Express: American and Russian Arts Today, a collaborative venture to promote cultural exchange and the Mikhail Prokhorov Fund’s inaugural artistic alliance with a US performing arts institution. For more information on TransCultural Express, download the program press release. A metaphysical exploration of spiritual isolation and Russian identity, Tarkovsky’s (Solaris, Stalker) penultimate film Nostalghia (1983) follows Russian expat and misanthropic poet Andrei (Oleg Yankovsky, The Mirror) as he travels to Italy to conduct research on an 18th-century composer. In the course of his study, he is overcome by melancholy and a longing for his home country—a sentiment reflective of the exiled Tarkovsky’s own struggle with displacement, this being his first film made outside of the USSR (the film’s Italian title translates as “homesickness”).
    [Show full text]
  • Tarkovsky Is for Me the Greatest, the One Who Invented a New Language, True to the Nature of Film As It Captures Life As a Reflection, Life As a Dream.”
    stop press stop press stop press stop press stop press stop press stop press stop press stop press stop press stop press stop press Curzon Mayfair 38 Curzon Street 7 – 13 DECEMBER London W1J Features £10/£8 Curzon Members; www.curzoncinemas.com Documentaries £6.50 Box Office: 0871 7033 989 TARKOVSKY FESTIVAL – A RETROSPECTIVE As part of the celebration of the 75th Anniversary of one of the undisputed masters of world cinema, Andrei Tarkovsky (1932 – 1986), Curzon Cinemas and Artificial Eye present screenings of his feature films, documentaries about him, and the reading of a stage play related to his work. Most screenings will be introduced by an actor or member of the crew, followed by a Q&A. Related activities will take place across the capital. “Tarkovsky is for me the greatest, the one who invented a new language, true to the nature of film as it captures life as a reflection, life as a dream.” Ingmar Bergman FRI 7 DECEMBER 7PM OPENING GALA PLUS Q&A: THE SACRIFICE (PG) – NEW PRINT Director: Andrei Tarkovsky / Starring: Erland Josephson, Susan Fleetwood, Gudrun Gisladottir / Russia 1986 / 148 mins / Russian with English subtitles Tarkovsky's final film unfolds in the hours before a nuclear holocaust. Alexander is celebrating his birthday when a crackly TV announcement warns of imminent nuclear catastrophe. Alexander makes a promise to God that he will sacrifice all he holds dear, if the disaster can be averted. The next day dawns and everything is restored to normality, but Alexander must now keep his vow. We hope to welcome on stage lead actress Gudrun Gisladottir, and Layla Alexander-Garrett, the interpreter on THE SACRIFICE.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarkovsky's Legacy. Tarkovskian Inspirations in Contemporary Cinema
    Marina Pellanda Tarkovsky’s legacy Tarkovskian inspirations in contemporary cinema THE STORY ACCORDING TO TARKOVSKY In his Répertoire, French writer Michel Butor imagined all men to be „continu- ously immersed like in a washtub“ in stories (Butor 1960, 1). Everything that is „other than us“, wrote the author, is known to us not because we have seen it but because someone has told us about it, with the configurations of meaning that make every narrated event something to communicate to others. In order to ex- ist, the story must allow itself first to be indiscriminately fragmented, and then forcibly reassembled. If we agree with Butor that narration seems to engulf us like water in a wash- tub, it is also true that every story remains essentially impossible to tell: as an in- tegral part of nature surrounding us, it is intolerant of any form of manipulation, since every manipulation is a meaningful organization of the awareness of time. Chained to the „present“ that is brought to life in every story, the imagination seems prevalently to be subject to a time that, along the lines of Schiller, we might define as „extraneous time“ (cfr. Morelli 1995, 13); nevertheless, it is often true that the user – be he a spectator or a reader – is allowed to proceed at an uneven pace through the event in which he is partaking, thereby tailoring the experi- ence to his own subjective needs. When this happens – for example in Sterne’s Tristram Shandy gentleman, or Joyce’s Ulysses or in the films of Russian director Andrei Tarkovsky who, while at the very back of a long shot and still out of focus, is slowly moving towards these pages – a standardization occurs that for some may be the emblem of an authentic waste of time, whereas for more insight- 549 Marina Pellanda ful eyes, it appears as a concession: the author grants the reader or spectator, the right to experience his own excursions through time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy Fool in Late Tarkovsky
    Journal of Religion & Film Volume 18 | Issue 1 Article 45 3-31-2014 The olH y Fool in Late Tarkovsky Robert O. Efird Virginia Tech, [email protected] Recommended Citation Efird, Robert O. (2014) "The oH ly Fool in Late Tarkovsky," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 18 : Iss. 1 , Article 45. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol18/iss1/45 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The olH y Fool in Late Tarkovsky Abstract This article analyzes the Russian cultural and religious phenomenon of holy foolishness (iurodstvo) in director Andrei Tarkovsky’s last two films, Nostalghia and Sacrifice. While traits of the holy fool appear in various characters throughout the director’s oeuvre, a marked change occurs in the films made outside the Soviet Union. Coincident with the films’ increasing disregard for spatiotemporal consistency and sharper eschatological focus, the character of the fool now appears to veer off into genuine insanity, albeit with a seemingly greater sensitivity to a visionary or virtual world of the spirit and explicit messianic task. Keywords Andrei Tarkovsky, Sacrifice, Nostalghia, Holy Foolishness Author Notes Robert Efird is Assistant Professor of Russian at Virginia Tech. He holds a PhD in Slavic from the University of Virginia and is the author of a number of articles dealing with Russian and Soviet cinema. This article is available in Journal of Religion & Film: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol18/iss1/45 Efird: The Holy Fool in Late Tarkovsky For roughly seven hundred years the holy fool has remained one of the more conspicuous particularities of Russian Orthodox Christianity and a consistent, yet perpetually evolving aspect of the Russian cultural identity.
    [Show full text]
  • March 24, 2009 (XVIII:10) Andrei Tarkovsky, NOSTALGHIA, 1983 125 Minutes
    March 24, 2009 (XVIII:10) Andrei Tarkovsky, NOSTALGHIA, 1983 125 minutes Directed by Andrei Tarkovsky Screenplay by Andrei Tarkovsky &Tonino Guerra Produced by Franco Casati Cinematography by Giuseppe Lanci Film Editing by Erminia Marani and Amedeo Salfa Oleg Yankovsky...Andrei Gorchakov Erland Josephson...Domenico Domiziana Giordano...Eugenia Patrizia Terreno...Andrei's Wife Laura De Marchi...Chambermaid Delia Boccardo...Domenico's Wife Milena Vukotic...Civil Servant Raffaele Di Mario Rate Furlan Livio Galassi Elena Magoia Piero Vida Holmes and Dr. Watson: The Hound of the Baskervilles (1981), Tot samyy Myunkhgauzen/Theat Munchhausen (1979), ANDREI TARKOVSKY (April 4, 1932, Zavrazhe, Ivanono, Povorot/The Turning Point (1978), Moy laskovyy i nezhnyy zver/A USSR—December 29, 1986, Paris, France, lung cancer) directed Hunting Accident (1978), Sladkaya zhenshchina/A Sweet Woman 11 films: Offret/The Sacrifice (1986), Nostalghia (1983), Tempo (1976), Sentimentalnyy roman (1976), Zerkalo/The Mirror (1975), di viaggio/Voyage in Time (1983), Stalker (1979), Zerkalo/The Premiya (1974), Rasplata/Reckoning (1970), and O lyubvi/A Mirror (1975), Solyaris/Solaris (1972), Andrey Rublyov/Andrei Ballad of Love (1966). Rublev (1966), Ivanovo detstvo/Ivan’s Childhood (1962), Katok i skripka/The Skating Rink and the Violin (1961), Segodnya ERLAND JOSEPHSON (June 15, 1923, Stockholm, Stockholms län, uvolneniya ne budet/There Will Be No Leave Today (1959), and Sweden) has been in several Ingmar Bergman films. He has 98 Ubiytsy/The Killers (1958). acting credits,
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Analysis of the Films of Andrei Tarkovsky in Relation to the Post-Thaw Soviet Moment
    A Historical Analysis of the Films of Andrei Tarkovsky in Relation to the Post-Thaw Soviet Moment Gus Helbock Haverford College Class of 2017 History Thesis Professor Linda Gerstein Professor James Krippner April 21, 2017 Helbock i Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank the professors at Haverford College who guided me through my educational experience, especially in the History Department. Specifically, I am grateful for the help that Professor Linda Gerstein and Professor James Krippner provided as my first reader/advisor and second reader, respectively. The advice they gave me and the historical insight they provided were integral in the completion of this thesis. I would also like to thank my family and friends who have given me love and support throughout the entirety of the thesis process. Helbock ii Abstract During the latter half of the twentieth century, Andrei Tarkovsky received arguably more critical admiration for his films than any Soviet director. During his filmmaking career, the Soviet Union experienced a tumultuous socio-cultural, as well as political, moment. After the death of Stalin, the Khrushchev Thaw of the late 1950s and early 1960s allowed for significantly more freedom of expression. It was at this time that Tarkovsky’s career began. However, through the 1960s and 1970s, a reactionary period in Soviet politics led to a return of stringent censorship, making Tarkovsky’s filmmaking process difficult. In the early 1980s, Tarkovsky emigrated to Western Europe, where he completed his final two films before his death in 1986. Due to his contentious relationship with the Soviet state, this thesis will attempt to analyze Tarkovsky and assess his relationship to the Russian intelligentsia and the dissident movements of the late twentieth century, as well as his relationship with spirituality and religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on Philosophy, Narrative and Symbol in the Cinema And
    The Soul that Thinks: Essays on Philosophy, Narrative and Symbol in the Cinema and Thought of Andrei Tarkovsky A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Fine Arts of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Daniel O. Jones November 2007 2 This dissertation titled The Soul that Thinks: Essays on Philosophy, Narrative and Symbol in the Cinema and Thought of Andrei Tarkovsky by DANIEL O. JONES has been approved for the Interdisciplinary Arts and the College of Fine Arts by Vladimir L. Marchenkov Assistant Professor of Interdisciplinary Arts Charles A. McWeeny Dean, College of Fine Arts 3 ABSTRACT JONES, DANIELS O., Ph.D., November 2007, Interdisciplinary Arts The Soul that Thinks: Essays on Philosophy, Narrative and Symbol in the Cinema and Thought of Andrei Tarkovsky (226 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Vladimir L. Marchenkov This dissertation examines the films and philosophy of Andrei Tarkovsky in relationship to the artists that influenced him and in the context of the tradition he and those artists create. I am particularly interested in theological and philosophical aspects of his work in relation to aesthetics and in the effects of literature, painting and music on his film style. This work is part historiography and part meditation on the meanings of the films and how they are created. I suggest that, despite a reasonable popularity, Tarkovsky is widely misunderstood, and I hope to demonstrate that the cause of this misunderstanding results, at least in part, from failing to account for the broad artistic tradition to which Tarkovsky belongs.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrei Tarkovsky's Imaginary: Word, Silence, and Meaning
    Journal of Literature and Art Studies, February 2018, Vol. 8, No. 2, 210-215 doi: 10.17265/2159-5836/2018.02.004 D DAVID PUBLISHING Andrei Tarkovsky’s Imaginary: Word, Silence, and Meaning Mário Avelar Universidade Aberta, Lisbon, Portugal Andrei Tarkovsky’s cinematic signature bespeaks of a metaphysical dimension which is inseparable of an unwavering dialogue between poetic word and image. In three of his movies—Mirror (1975), Stalker (1979) and Nostalghia (1983)—the Russian director helps to build this dimension with the insertion of his father’s Arsenii poems. Although these poems may develop a pivotal dynamic in Mirror, even when they may seem to have a marginal existence, such as they do in Stalker and Nostalghia, their function is far from assuming a decorative status. Anchored in Tarkovsky’s notion of organic movie in mind, as he developed it in his book Sculpting in Time, and in William Desmond’s concept of in-betweeness, as he conceived it in Art, Origins, Otherness—Between Philosophy and Art, this article challenges the notion of structural relevance, and shows how the alleged marginal presence of Arseni’s words contribute to create a space of metaphysical in-betweeness that lies at the core of the movie’s spiritual dimension. Keywords: in-betweeness, journey, metaphysic, organic, poetry, stalker, word Introduction Poetry plays a relevant role in Andrei Tarkovsky’s filmic dialogue between word and image. Among the poets who echo in the Russian director’s movies, his father Arsenii stands out with poems in Mirror (1975), Stalker (1979) and Nostalghia (1983). Film critic Kitty Hunter Blair claims that these poems operate on different levels: as key element to the concept and structure of Mirror, and as quotations without structural relevance in Stalker and Nostalghia.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernity Crisis and Its Reflections in Tarkovsky's
    İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2013/I, 44, 49-66 MODERNITY CRISIS AND ITS REFLECTIONS IN TARKOVSKY’S NOSTALGHIA AND MIRROR Metin ÇOLAK* Abstract This article examines the modernity crisis and the phenomenon of nostalgia in the works of the dis- tinctive Russian film director Andrei Tarkovsky’s films Nostalghia (1983) and Mirror (1975). Within this perspective this study not only investigates the term, nostalgia, and its typology in the films, but also focuses on the socio-cultural and political refractions in the background that shape the director’s use of the concept. Tarkovsky’s cinema, particularly his last films, reflects the consequences of modernity crisis. In this regard his filmsMirror and Nostalghia play an important role. This paper suggests that the film Nostalghia was made by the director in Italy in order to reveal this crisis in the case of a poet. The film, Nostalghia, removes the frontiers that developed in the Mirror, and puts the phenomenon nostalgia in the centre of the modernity crisis. To analyse the relationships between modernity crisis and Tarkovsky’s films, this study grounds its analytic perspectives on the qualitative-descriptive method. In this regard, the study will start with the general characteristics of Tarkovsky’s cinema and examine the typology of nostalgia, and then focus on his Nostalghia. After a detailed analysis of Nostalghia within this perspective, the article will compare it to another of his films, the controversial Mirror, to examine the changes in the master’s life. Keywords: Modernity, Nostalgia, Andrei Tarkovsky MODERNİTENİN KRİZİ VE TARKOVSKY’NİN NOSTALGHIA VE AYNA FİLMLERİNDEKİ YANSIMALARI ÖZ Bu makale modernitenin krizi ve nostalji olgusunu ünlü Rus film yönetmeni Andrei Tarkovsky’nin Nostalghia (1983) ve Ayna (1975) filmleri özelinde incelemektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarkovsky and Brevity
    John A. Riley holds a PhD from DANDELION Birkbeck College. Supervised by postgraduate arts journal & research network / Professor Ian Christie, the thesis, VOLUME 1 NUMBER 1 SPRING 2010 : G EN R E entitled ‘Shifting Mirrors: An Intertextual Approach to The Films of Andrei Tarkovsky’ conceptualises the many resonances between Tarkovsky’s films and the work of others as reflections, double exposures and hauntings. He writes about film for a wide variety of publications. Article Email: [email protected] Tarkovsky and Brevity John A. Riley / __________________________________________ Brevity is not a word that springs to mind when one thinks of Andrei Tarkovsky. His film Stalker took two and a half hours to convey three men and a dog across a field. Tarkovsky’s films, and his powerful creative personality, which often dominates the discourse around his work, have become part of the canon of world cinema. His films have become bywords for the lengthy, difficult, and wholly serious. But despite this reputation for sprawl, there was an undercurrent of concision in his thought and work. In this article, I will turn to a rarely discussed strand in Tarkovsky’s art: his Polaroid photographs.1 I will contrast Tarkovsky’s approach to Polaroid photography with the long form narrative experiments he undertook in film, in order to argue that, perhaps somewhat paradoxically, Tarkovsky appreciated brevity, and that an understanding of Tarkovsky’s art that focuses on his mobilization of extended duration tells only a partial story. I will construct this argument against the stereotypical understanding of Tarkovsky as propagated by his own (in fact co- authored) book Sculpting in Time (1986).2 Sculpting in Time outlines traditional aesthetic beliefs (art as expression of beauty, beauty as expression of truth) alongside personal reflections and reminiscences.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Seifert Nostalghia for a Great Past.Pdf
    Paper prepared for the Third Euroacademia International Conference Re-Inventing Eastern Europe Berlin, 28 – 29 March 2014 This paper is a draft Please do not cite Nostalgia for a Great Past Peter Seifert, activist for the NGO New Humanity Movement, until 2005 teaching Intercultural Studies at The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) Abstract: Andrei Tarkovsky (1932 – 1986), the great Russian film director, has a renown that has grown slowly but surly over the past decades. Refusing to be labelled a dissident, from his start he made utmost subjective veracity his inner compass, running up against a system, in which mendacity seemed to be endemic. Due to his international reputation he was in some ways privileged among Soviet filmmakers, nonetheless he could realize only seven films because of constant hampering by the authorities. Nostalghia (1983) is about a Russian intellectual visiting Italy with a research interest regarding an 18th Century Russian composer. But the film is very little plot-driven and mainly about the feelings and melancholic reveries of a Russian far from his home. More importantly, it is about the possibility of spiritual communion between Eastern and Western Europe, namely Italy and Russia. In a way Italy could be considered the heartland of Western Europe, and Russia the cold heartland of Eastern Europe. Tarkovsky’s protagonist states in the beginning of the film bluntly that he is deeply sceptical about the possibility of this communion. Tarkovsky in person repeated this assessment not less bluntly in interviews and discussions. Notwithstanding this apparent scepticism, he endeavoured to create a true artistic unity between an important Italian work of art and an important Russian work of poetry: the “Madonna del Parto” (c.1465) by Piero della Francesca and the poem “Ptichka – Little Bird” by Aleksander Pushkin.
    [Show full text]