DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulletin of the Natural History Museum Geology Series

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bulletin of the Natural History Museum Geology Series ISSN 0968-0462 The Natural History Museum HISTABV MUSEUI 9 MAY 2012 I PRESENTED I GENERAL LIBRAR Y Geology Series VOLUME 56 NUMBER 1 29 JUNE 2000 The Bulletin of The Natural History Museum (formerly: Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) ), instituted in 1949, is issued in four scientific series, Botany, Entomology, Geology (incorporating Mineralogy) and Zoology. The Geology Series is edited in the Museum's Department of Palaeontology Keeper of Palaeontology: Prof S.K. Donovan Editor of Bulletin: Dr M.K. Howarth Assistant Editor: Mr C. Jones Papers in the Bulletin are primarily the results of research carried out on the unique and ever- growing collections of the Museum, both by the scientific staff and by specialists from elsewhere who make use of the Museum's resources. Many of the papers are works of reference that will remain indispensable for years to come. All papers submitted for publication are subjected to external peer review for acceptance. A volume contains about 160 pages, made up by two numbers, published in the Spring and Autumn. Subscriptions may be placed for one or more of the series on an annual basis. Individual numbers and back numbers can be purchased and a Bulletin catalogue, by series, is available. Orders and enquiries should be sent to: Intercept Ltd. P.O. Box 716 Andover Hampshire SP 10 1YG Telephone: (01264) 334748 Fax: (01264) 334058 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.intercept.co.uk Claims for non-receipt of issues of the Bulletin will be met free of charge if received by the Publisher within 6 months for the UK, and 9 months for the rest of the world. World List abbreviation: Bull. nat. Hist. Mus. Lond. (Geol.) © The Natural History Museum, 2000 Geology Series ISSN 0968-0462 Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 1-83 The Natural History Museum Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD Issued 29 June 2000 Typeset by Ann Buchan (Typesetters), Middlesex Printed in Great Britain by Henry Ling Ltd, at the Dorset Press, Dorchester, Dorset . Bull. nat. Hist. Mus. Lond. (Geol.) 56(1) Issued 29 June 2000 The history, geology, age and fauna (mainly insects) of Burmese amber, Myanmar CONTENTS 1. A review of the history, geology and age of Burmese amber (Burmite), by V.V. Zherikhin & A.J. Ross 3 2. A list of type and figured specimens of insects and other inclusions in Burmese amber, by A. J. Ross & P.V. York 11 3. A preliminary list of arthropod families present in the Burmese amber collection at The Natural History Museum, London, by A. P. Rasnitsyn &A. J. Ross 21 4. The first fossil prosopistomatid mayfly from Burmese amber (Ephemeroptera; Prosopistomatidae), by D. Sinitshenkova 25 5. The most primitive whiteflies (Hemiptera; Aleyrodidae; Bernaeinae subfam. nov.) from the Mesozoic of Asia and Burmese amber, with an overview of Burmese amber hemipterans, by D.E. Shcherbakov 29 6. A new genus and species of Lophioneuridae from Burmese amber (Thripida (=Thysanoptera): Lophioneurina), by V. V. Zherikhin 39 7. Burmapsilocephala cockerelli, a new genus and species of Asiloidea (Diptera) from Burmese amber, by S.D. Gaimari & M.B. Mostovski 43 8. Phantom midges (Diptera: Chaoboridae) from Burmese amber, by E. D. Lukashevich 47 9. An archaic new genus of Evaniidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera) and implications for the biology of ancestral evanioids, by H.H. Basibuyuk, A.R Rasnitsyn, M.G. Fitton & D.L.J. Quicke 53 10. Digger Wasps (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae) in Burmese Amber, by A. V. Antropov 59 1 1 Electrobisium acutum Cockerell, a cheiridiid pseudoscorpion from Burmese amber, with remarks on the validity of the Cheiridioidea (Arachnida, Chelonethi), by M.L.I. Judson 79 "¥hI natural history museum " 9 MAY 2012 PRESENTED I GENERAL LI BRARY y 8 Bull. nat. Hist. Mus. Land. (Geol.) 56(1): 3-10 Issued 29 June 2000 A review of the history, geology and age of Burmese amber (Burmite) V.V. ZHERIKHIN Arthropod Laboratory, Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya Str. 123, Moscow 117647, Russia A.J. ROSS Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK SYNOPSIS. An overview of the present state of knowledge of Burmese amber is given based on an exhaustive literature search. st Early Chinese literature suggests Burmese amber has been known since the 1 century AD and was later traded from northern Burma to Yunnan Province. Amber has been recorded from five regions in Burma (Myanmar): the Hukawng Valley, Shwebo District, Thayetmo District, Pakokku District and Pegu District, but only Burmite from the Hukawng Valley in northern Burma has been commercially mined. The first visit by a westerner to the amber mines in the Hukawng Valley was by Captain Hannay in 1836. Subsequent visits by members of the Geological Survey of India showed that the amber-bearing deposits are of Middle Eocene age and consist of shales and sandstones with subordinate limestone and conglomerate horizons. The archaic insects in Burmite and the presence of derived clasts in the amber-bearing sediments suggest that the amber has been reworked and is probably of Upper Cretaceous age. INTRODUCTION Fraquet (1987). Laufer published translations of passages referring to amber from ancient Chinese literature. He considers that the st Chinese became familiar with Burmese amber in the 1 century AD Amber is fossilized plant resin. There are many different types which and that trade in amber between Burma and Yunnan Province be- may contain the remains of organisms that were trapped by liquid came established soon after. This was based on the Hou Han shu resin. They provide much palaeontological information, particularly (Annals of the Later Han Dynasty, 205-265 AD), which mentioned about small terrestrial animals which are rarely preserved in amber in Ai lao, the ancient Shan kingdom in Yunnan which formed sediments. The inclusions in amber, such as insects, often show very st in the 1 century AD. Laufer indicated that mentions of amber from delicate morphological details which can rarely, or never, be seen on Yunnan in the Chinese literature became more frequent during the other kinds of fossils. For a long time, Baltic amber was the only following centuries. The production of amber in Yung ch'ang in fossil resin extensively studied palaeontologically while records of Yunnan is recorded in the Kuangya (a dictionary from 227-240 AD), inclusions in other resins were scarce and mostly anecdotal. The the Po wu chi (Records of remarkable objects, from 232-300 AD) situation changed during the last decades when systematic studies of and the Pieh lu (a medical book of uncertain age, referred to in a later organic inclusions in various fossil resins were developed (see work of 452-536 AD). Laufer (1906) however, considered that the Poinar, 1992 for a review). However, many kinds of amber are still amber from Yunnan originally came from Burma as Yung ch'ang is poorly investigated. only 1 80 km from the amber mining area in Burma. Pumpelly ( 1 867) Burmese amber, or Burmite is one of the most mysterious vari- also recorded amber from Yungchang in Yunnan, and also from other eties of fossil resins in the world. Though known for nearly 2000 localities in Shansi, Shensi, Szchuen, and Kwangtung provinces; so years in southeastern Asia and for four centuries in Europe, it is it appears that China does have its own amber deposits. Laufer poorly investigated scientifically, first of all because of the location (1906), however, was sceptical about reports of native Chinese of its deposits in a remote area of Upper Burma which was never easy amber and considered that they may refer instead to other resins. It to reach by a traveller. In this area there were the so-called should be noted that European amber was being imported into China 'unadministrated territories' in colonial times and later, in independ- th at least as early as the 1 century and that the Chinese had the ability ent Burma (now Myanmar), this area, situated between the 'Golden to fake amber from early times (Laufer, 1906). The very large piece Triangle' and the politically unstable Nagas region of India, remains of Burmese amber figured by Grimaldi ( 1 996, p. 4 1 ) and Ross ( 1 998, controlled rather by the local clans and insurrectionists than by the p. 14, fig. 33) (Natural History Museum (London), Mineralogy central government in Rangoon. Few geologists have visited this Department, specimen no. 1940,37) was originally purchased in area, each for a short time only, and the published data on the amber Guangzhou (Canton), China in 1860. D. Grimaldi and A. Shedrinsky occurrences are scarce. A comprehensive review of the literature has (pers. comm.) have confirmed that it is Burmese amber using pyroly- been undertaken and this paper outlines the present state of know- sis-gas chromatography. An analysis of the old Chinese literature ledge of Burmese amber. together with archaeological data may elucidate the relative impor- tance of Burmese amber in ancient and medieval China but at present this question seems to be unclear. It appears that there are no reviews THE HISTORY OF BURMITE of records of amber from old Burmese written sources which would be expected. It may be stated that Burmese amber was known in st for time, perhaps since the 1 century AD, and that 0-1800 AD China a very long the export of amber from Burma to Yunnan continued for many The most thorough account of the early history of trade in Burmese centuries. According to Laufer (1906), the first European who men- amber is by Laufer (1906), summarized by Penzer (1922) and tioned Burmese amber was the Portuguese Jesuit Father Alvarez © The Natural History Museum, 2000 V.V.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • M1atewnjifuseum 1 Oxftates
    M1AtewnJifuseum 1 oxftates. PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y. NUMBER i8oo OCTOBER i6, 1956 Pseudoscorpions of the Family Cher- netidae from New Mexico BY C. CLAYTON HOFF' The present paper is the third of a series on the classification and dis- tribution of the pseudoscorpions of New Mexico and is concerned with the monosphyronid pseudoscorpions exclusive of the Cheliferidae. Two genera and eight species are described as new, three species are recorded for the first time from New Mexico, and previously unreported state records are given for two other species. In order to make the account of the pseudoscorpions of New Mexico more useful, brief discussions are given of the higher taxa of monosphyronid pseudoscorpions exclusive of the Cheliferidae and attention is called to the possibility of eventually finding additional groups represented in the New Mexico fauna. The Cheliferidae will be discussed in the fourth paper of this series. Most of the collections reported here were made from 1947 to 1955, during which time the writer was favored by financial aid from faculty research grants from the University of New Mexico and grants from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and from the National Science Foundation. Pseudoscorpions reported as associated with rodents in Santa Fe County are from collections made available by Harvey B. Morlan, Sanitarian, United States Public Health Service. These collec- tions were taken in connection with studies on rodent ecology at the Santa Fe, New Mexico, Field Station of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • André Nel Sixtieth Anniversary Festschrift
    Palaeoentomology 002 (6): 534–555 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ PALAEOENTOMOLOGY PE Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Editorial ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.6.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:25D35BD3-0C86-4BD6-B350-C98CA499A9B4 André Nel sixtieth anniversary Festschrift DANY AZAR1, 2, ROMAIN GARROUSTE3 & ANTONIO ARILLO4 1Lebanese University, Faculty of Sciences II, Department of Natural Sciences, P.O. Box: 26110217, Fanar, Matn, Lebanon. Email: [email protected] 2State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China. 3Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB-UMR 7205-CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, Entomologie, F-75005, Paris, France. 4Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. FIGURE 1. Portrait of André Nel. During the last “International Congress on Fossil Insects, mainly by our esteemed Russian colleagues, and where Arthropods and Amber” held this year in the Dominican several of our members in the IPS contributed in edited volumes honoring some of our great scientists. Republic, we unanimously agreed—in the International This issue is a Festschrift to celebrate the 60th Palaeoentomological Society (IPS)—to honor our great birthday of Professor André Nel (from the ‘Muséum colleagues who have given us and the science (and still) national d’Histoire naturelle’, Paris) and constitutes significant knowledge on the evolution of fossil insects a tribute to him for his great ongoing, prolific and his and terrestrial arthropods over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Ant-Like Flower Beetles (Coleoptera: Anthicidae) of the Uk, Ireland and Channel Isles
    BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 23: 2010 99 ANT-LIKE FLOWER BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: ANTHICIDAE) OF THE UK, IRELAND AND CHANNEL ISLES DMITRY TELNOV Stopinu novads, Darza iela 10, LV-2130, Dzidrinas, Latvia; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Anthicidae or ant-like flower beetles of the UK, Ireland and Channel Isles are reviewed. A species list, identification key, short diagnoses and illustrations of all taxa are given. Brief information on known ecological preferences of species is given. Key words: identification, distribution, key, United Kingdom, Ireland, fauna, ecology. INTRODUCTION Anthicidae are a cosmopolitan family of small to medium-sized, fast-moving beetles of the superfamily Tenebrionoidea. Anthicidae are represented in the World fauna by approximately 100 genera, and about 3500 species (Chandler, 2010). Only a few species are known from the fossil record. The last revision of the British Anthicidae was published by F. D. Buck (1954) in the well-known series Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects. Since then, there have been numerous nomenclatural changes within Anthicidae, and some additional species (introduced) have been recorded from the UK, making Buck’s key out of date. During 2004 and 2005 a total of 3356 specimens of Anthicidae from the UK and Ireland were examined by the author, mainly from the collections of The Natural History Museum (London), Oxford University Museum of Natural History and National Museum of Ireland. Additional data for more than 2100 specimens were received from other British museums and private collections between 2005 and 2007. A new key and short diagnoses for the genera are presented, as well as data on habitats and general distribution of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera: Aphididae): New Finding on Ornamental Clematis Spp
    Phytoparasitica DOI 10.1007/s12600-014-0417-2 Note: Aphis vitalbae Ferrari, 1872 (Hemiptera: Aphididae): new finding on ornamental Clematis spp. in Poland Roman Hałaj & Barbara Osiadacz Received: 19 March 2014 /Accepted: 29 May 2014 # The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Aphis vitalbae Ferrari is reported from Poland these species concern the central and eastern Palearctic for the first time on ornamental clematis (Clematis spp.). (Hille Ris Lambers 1966; Kumar & Burkhardt 1970; The distribution of this aphid in Europe and its possible Narzikulov & Daniyarova 1990; Pashchenko 1997). So expansion route are presented with a key to identifying far three species of Aphis have been found to infest the aphids infesting Clematis plants in Europe. clematis plants in Europe (Holman 2009), and only two have been reported from Poland (Osiadacz & Hałaj Keywords Climatic changes . Invasiveness forecast . 2010). Besides polyphagous A. fabae, the oligophagous Local populations . Potential pest . Species A. clematidis has been found in some regions of Poland acclimatization . Zoogeography (Osiadacz & Hałaj 2009). The material gathered from Clematis x vitalba L. in Upper Silesia included A. vitalbae [apterae and alate viviparae, Zabrze city, ę ł Ś ą The species of Clematis are infested by 27 aphid species 14.07.2012, leg. M. Kr cia a, Ruda l ska city, 10.09.2012, ł (Blackman & Eastop 2014), of which nine belong to leg. R. Ha aj; apterae males and oviparae, Zabrze city, ę ł the genus Aphis. Three of those species (A. fabae 7.10.2013, leg. M. Kr cia a, Bytom city, 02.11.2013, Scopoli, 1763; A.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Aphidomorpha (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha) Known from Slovakia
    Folia faunistica Slovaca 18 (3) 2013: 275–300 www.ffs.sk CHECKLIST OF APHIDOMORPHA (HEMIPTERA: STERNORRHYNCHA) KNOWN FROM SLOVAKIA 1,2 3 1 Katarína Goffová & Wacław Wojciechowski 2 Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK–84506 Bratislava, Slovakia [[email protected]] 3 Department of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, B–2, SK–84215 Bratislava, Slovakia University of Silesia, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Zoology, Bankova 9, PL–40007 Katowice, Poland [[email protected]] Abstract: This checklist of Aphidomorpha from Slovakia counts 717 species of 10 families and 3 superfamilies (Aphidoidea, Adelgoidea, Phylloxeroidea). This paper presents existing valid names for species found in Slovakia since 1952 untill nowadays. Species were transferred between families due taxonomic changesKey words: from 1977. Aphidomorpha, Aphidoidea, Adelgoidea, Phylloxeroidea, checklist, Slovakia. INTRODUCTION (1984), Blackman (1990), Guldemond (1991), Blackman & Eastop (1994). Knowledge of the diversity of aphids in Slovakia- was summarised by Holman & Pintera (1977). Last checklist of 596 species of Aphidomorpha was Since 1977, entomologists found out new informa- published in 1977 (Holman & Pintera 1977) by tion about aphids, but until nowadays, new check– nomenclature of Mordvilko. Next time, research of list has not been executed. This checklist was pre aphids was stagnating. - pared on the basis of the publications from 1952 till 2009. In the nineteen eighties, on the basis of coopera- tion Department of Zoology – Comenius University- The first faunal records of aphid from Slovakia- in Bratislava and Department of Zoology – Univer were the collections by Horváth (1897) from the sity of Silesia in Katowice, research near Bratisla- Žitný ostrov, but these data weren’t adequate for in va was proceeding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Timescale of Early Land Plant Evolution PNAS PLUS
    The timescale of early land plant evolution PNAS PLUS Jennifer L. Morrisa,1, Mark N. Putticka,b,1, James W. Clarka, Dianne Edwardsc, Paul Kenrickb, Silvia Presseld, Charles H. Wellmane, Ziheng Yangf,g, Harald Schneidera,d,h,2, and Philip C. J. Donoghuea,2 aSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom; bDepartment of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom; cSchool of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10, United Kingdom; dDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom; eDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom; fDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; gRadclie Institute for Advanced Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; and hCenter of Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan 666303, China Edited by Peter R. Crane, Oak Spring Garden Foundation, Upperville, VA, and approved January 17, 2018 (received for review November 10, 2017) Establishing the timescale of early land plant evolution is essential recourse but to molecular clock methodology, employing the for testing hypotheses on the coevolution of land plants and known fossil record to calibrate and constrain molecular evolu- Earth’s System. The sparseness of early land plant megafossils and tion to time. Unfortunately, the relationships among the four stratigraphic controls on their distribution make the fossil record principal lineages of land plants, namely, hornworts, liverworts, an unreliable guide, leaving only the molecular clock. However, mosses, and tracheophytes, are unresolved, with almost every the application of molecular clock methodology is challenged by possible solution currently considered viable (14).
    [Show full text]
  • Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 8 Number 3 - Fall 1975 Number 3 - Fall 1975 Article 4 October 1975 Current Classification of the amiliesF of Coleoptera M G. de Viedma University of Madrid M L. Nelson Wayne State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation de Viedma, M G. and Nelson, M L. 1975. "Current Classification of the amiliesF of Coleoptera," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 8 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol8/iss3/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. de Viedma and Nelson: Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST CURRENT CLASSIFICATION OF THE FAMILIES OF COLEOPTERA M. G. de viedmal and M. L. els son' Several works on the order Coleoptera have appeared in recent years, some of them creating new superfamilies, others modifying the constitution of these or creating new families, finally others are genera1 revisions of the order. The authors believe that the current classification of this order, incorporating these changes would prove useful. The following outline is based mainly on Crowson (1960, 1964, 1966, 1967, 1971, 1972, 1973) and Crowson and Viedma (1964). For characters used on classification see Viedma (1972) and for family synonyms Abdullah (1969). Major features of this conspectus are the rejection of the two sections of Adephaga (Geadephaga and Hydradephaga), based on Bell (1966) and the new sequence of Heteromera, based mainly on Crowson (1966), with adaptations.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Empidoidea (Diptera)
    ZOOTAXA 1180 The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera) BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR & JEFFREY M. CUMMING Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR & JEFFREY M. CUMMING The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera) (Zootaxa 1180) 172 pp.; 30 cm. 21 Apr. 2006 ISBN 1-877407-79-8 (paperback) ISBN 1-877407-80-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2006 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41383 Auckland 1030 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2006 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) Zootaxa 1180: 1–172 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1180 Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera) BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR1 & JEFFREY M. CUMMING2 1 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Invertebrate Biodiversity, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, C.E.F., Ottawa, ON, Canada
    [Show full text]
  • Beetle Diversity in an Eastern Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides Bartr.) Plantation and Adjacent Bottomland Hardwood Forest in Southeastern Arkansas Michael D
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 56 Article 32 2002 Beetle Diversity in an Eastern Cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) Plantation and Adjacent Bottomland Hardwood Forest in Southeastern Arkansas Michael D. Warriner Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission T. Evan Nebeker Mississippi State University Steven A. Tucker Mississippi State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Forest Management Commons Recommended Citation Warriner, Michael D.; Nebeker, T. Evan; and Tucker, Steven A. (2002) "Beetle Diversity in an Eastern Cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) Plantation and Adjacent Bottomland Hardwood Forest in Southeastern Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 56 , Article 32. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol56/iss1/32 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 56 [2002], Art. 32 Beetle Diversity in an Eastern Cottonwood {Populus deltoides Bartr.) Plantation and Adjacent Bottomland Hardwood Forest in Southeastern Arkansas Michael D. Warriner* T. Evan Nebeker Steven A.
    [Show full text]
  • Borowiec Et Al-2020 Ants – Phylogeny and Classification
    A Ants: Phylogeny and 1758 when the Swedish botanist Carl von Linné Classification published the tenth edition of his catalog of all plant and animal species known at the time. Marek L. Borowiec1, Corrie S. Moreau2 and Among the approximately 4,200 animals that he Christian Rabeling3 included were 17 species of ants. The succeeding 1University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA two and a half centuries have seen tremendous 2Departments of Entomology and Ecology & progress in the theory and practice of biological Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, classification. Here we provide a summary of the NY, USA current state of phylogenetic and systematic 3Social Insect Research Group, Arizona State research on the ants. University, Tempe, AZ, USA Ants Within the Hymenoptera Tree of Ants are the most ubiquitous and ecologically Life dominant insects on the face of our Earth. This is believed to be due in large part to the cooperation Ants belong to the order Hymenoptera, which also allowed by their sociality. At the time of writing, includes wasps and bees. ▶ Eusociality, or true about 13,500 ant species are described and sociality, evolved multiple times within the named, classified into 334 genera that make up order, with ants as by far the most widespread, 17 subfamilies (Fig. 1). This diversity makes the abundant, and species-rich lineage of eusocial ants the world’s by far the most speciose group of animals. Within the Hymenoptera, ants are part eusocial insects, but ants are not only diverse in of the ▶ Aculeata, the clade in which the ovipos- terms of numbers of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Insects Psocoptera of the Galapagos Islands
    PACIFIC INSECTS Vol. 15, no. 1 20 May 1973 Organ of the program *'Zoogeography and Evolution of Pacific Insects.*' Published by Entomology Department, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A. Editorial committee: J. L. Gressitt (editor), S. Asahina, R. G. Fennah, R. A. Harrison, T. C. Maa, F. J. Radovsky, C. W. Sabrosky. J. J. H. Szent-Ivany, J. van der Vecht, K. Yasumatsu and E. C. Zimmerman. Devoted to studies of insects and other terrestrial arthropods from the Pacific area, including eastern Asia, Australia and Antarctica. PSOCOPTERA OF THE GALAPAGOS ISLANDS By Ian W. B. Thornton1 and Anita K. T. Woo Abstract: The Psocopteran fauna of the Galapagos is reviewed comprehensively for the first time. Treated are 39 species, of which 18 are described as new. Numerous illustrations of the new species are presented. Distribution and faunal affinities of these psocopterans are discussed. INTRODUCTION The Galapagos Archipelago is situated on the equator about 960 km west of Ecuador. It consists of five large islands, which in decreasing order of their area are Albemarle, Indefatigable, Narborough, James and Chatham, eleven smaller islands and numerous islets and rocks. All the islands are volcanic and the volcanoes on some of them are still active. The latest eruption was reported on Narborough on May ll, 1968. Accord­ ing to Chubb (1933), Richardson (1933), Cox & Dalrymple (1966), and Wilson (1963), the Galapagos appear to be rather young as a whole and originated probably in the late Miocene (15 million years ago), with the southeastern islands older than the rest. Although the archipelago lies in the equatorial region, its climate is cool from June to December due to the Humboldt Current flowing through the archipelago from east to west as the South Equatorial Current.
    [Show full text]