DOCSLIB.ORG

Page 1 Table of Authorities (References Are to Pages.) CASES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Page 1 Table of Authorities (References Are to Pages.) CASES Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 1-800 Contacts v. WhenU.com .................................................11-9 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Lens.com, Inc. ....................... 11-16, 11-17 20th Century Wear, Inc. v. Sanmark-Stardust, Inc. .................2-14 800-JR Cigar, Inc. v. GoTo.com, Inc. .....................................11-11 A A. Bourjois & Co. v. Katzel .....................................................17-48 A1 Mortg. Corp. v. A1 Mortg. & Fin. Servs. LLC ...............11-29 A&H Sportswear, Inc. v. Victoria’s Secret Stores, Inc. ................................... 8-34, 16-13 Abbott Labs.v. Mead Johnson & Co. ........................... 10-8, 10-12 ABC Rug & Carpet Cleaning Serv., Inc. v. ABC Rug Cleaners Inc. ....................................................17-18 Abercrombie & Fitch v. Fashion Shops of Ky., Inc. .............17-58 Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, Inc. ...............2-2, 2-4, 2-10, 8-9, 12-53, 16-4 Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Moose Creek, Inc. .....................8-14 Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. Am. Eagle Outfitters, Inc. ........................................ 3-11, 3-15 Abraham v. Alpha Chi Omega ................................... 12-26, 12-28, ............................................................12-75, 12-76, 14-29, 17-9 Abraham Zion Corp. v. Lebow .................................................2-15 A.C. Gilbert Co., Ex parte ........................................................6-12 Accu Pers., Inc. v. Accustaff, Inc. .............................................22-4 Action Ink, Inc. v. N.Y. Jets, L.L.C. .......................................12-41 (Kane, Rel. #3, 6/15) T–1 KANE ON TRADEMARK LAW Adams v. Lindblad Travel, Inc. ...............................................14-15 Adams/Green Indus. Publ’g, Inc. v. Int’l Labmate Ltd. .........6-38 Adidas Am., Inc. v. Payless ShoeSource, Inc. .....3-4, 17-16, 17-20 Adray v. Ady-Mast, Inc. ...........................................................17-15 Advance Stores Co. v. Refinishing Specialties, Inc. ................22-8 Advance Watch Co. v. Kemper Nat’l Ins. Co. .........................13-8 Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc. ................................................11-41 Aetna Health Care Sys., Inc. v. Health Care Choice, Inc. .................................................17-19 Affiliated Hosp. Prods., Inc. v. Merdel Game Mfg. Co. .........8-10 Agri-Supply Co. v. Agrisupply.com .........................................11-33 AHP Subsidiary Holding Co. v. Stuart Hale Co. ...................15-25 Air Prods., Inc., In re ..............................................................20-11 Airs Aromatics, LLC v. Opinion [sic] Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Mgmt., Inc. .................................................19-40 A.J. Canfield Co. v. Concord Beverage Co. ...............................2-8 A.J. Canfield Co. v. Honickman ................................... 2-11, 12-63 A.J. Canfield Co. v. Vess Beverages, Inc. ................... 16-21, 16-22 AK Steel Corp. v. Sollac & Ugine .............................. 14-62, 14-65 Aktiebolaget Electrolux v. Armatron Int’l, Inc. ........................................8-17, 8-28, 17-17 Aktieselskabet af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc. ....19-61 Albert Dickinson Co. v. Mellos Peanut Co. ...........................15-14 Alcan Int’l, Ltd. v. S.A. Day Mfg. Co. ...................................14-30 Ale House Mgmt. Inc. v. Raleigh Ale House Inc. ..................5-23 Alfacell Corp. v. Anticancer, Inc. .................................... 6-10, 8-20 All Terrain Vehicle Litig., In re ..............................................10-19 All Video, Inc. v. Hollywood Entm’t Corp. ..............................22-7 Allard Enters., Inc. v. Advanced Programming Res., Inc. ....11-42 Allen Organ Co. v. Galanti Organ Builders, Inc. ...................10-16 Allied Maint. Corp. v. Allied Mech. Trades, Inc. .....1-14, 9-3, 9-7 Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. v. Converse, Inc. ................18-2 ALPO Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co. ....10-9, 10-23, 10-25, 10-27, 10-29, 17-20 Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. ...............................17-68, 17-69, 17-70 ALS Scan, Inc. v. Digital Serv. Consultants, Inc. ..................11-39 Altadis U.S.A., Inc. v. Monte Cristi de Tabacos ...................................... 17-24, 17-25 Alvi’s Drift Wine Int’l v. von Stiehl Winery ...........................19-34 AM Gen. Corp. v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. .................. 9-15, 15-10 T–2 Table of Authorities Amalgamated Bank v. Amalgamated Trust & Sav. Bank .........6-40 Amana Soc’y v. Gemeinde Brau, Inc. ....................................17-33 Amazing Spaces Inc. v. Metro Mini Storage ............... 2-29, 17-35 Amazon Techs., Inc. v. Wax ....................................................19-31 AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc. ........................ 3-24, 12-20, 12-41, 18-5 Am. Auto. Ass’n v. Dickerson ...................................................15-9 Am. Auto. Ass’n, Inc. v. AAA Ins. Agency, Inc. .......... 7-12, 12-29 Am. Basketball Ass’n v. AMF Voit, Inc. ...................................2-38 Am. Best Franchising, Inc. v. Abbott .....................................19-57 Am. Council of Certified Podiatric Physicians & Surgeons v. Am. Bd. of Podiatric Surgery, Inc. ................10-8 Am. Cyanamid Co. v. Connaught Labs., Inc. ..........................8-13 Am. Cyanamid Co. v. S.C. Johnson & Son ..............................7-13 Am. Dirigold Corp. v. Dirigold Metals Corp. ..........................21-2 Am. Express Co. v. Goetz .........................................................2-22 Am. Express Co. v. Vibra Approved Labs. Corp. ....................12-9 Am. Express Mktg. & Devel. Corp. v. Gilad Devel. Corp. ....9-42 Am. Express Travel Related Servs. Co. v. MasterCard Int’l, Inc. .......................................................10-18 Am. Fertility Soc’y, In re .............................................................2-5 Am. Heritage Life Ins. Co. v. Heritage Life Ins. Co. ............................................ 12-4, 12-35 Am. Home Prods. Corp., In re .................................................2-38 Am. Home Prods. Corp. v. Barr Labs., Inc. ..............................8-5 Am. Home Prods. Corp. v. B.F. Ascher & Co. .......................6-36 Am. Home Prods. Corp. v. Chelsea Labs., Inc. ......................3-31 Am. Home Prods. Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson ......................14-7 Am. Home Prods. Corp. v. Johnson Chem. Co. .....................2-14 Am. Honda Motor Co. v. Two Wheel Corp. ............. 10-30, 17-20 Am. Hosp. Supply Corp. v. Advanced Health Sys., Inc. .......15-14 Am. Hygienic Labs., Inc. v. Tiffany & Co. .................... 5-3, 19-12 Am. Int’l Grp., Inc. v. London Am. Int’l Corp. ......... 15-21, 15-25 Am. Luggage Works, Inc. v. U.S. Trunk Co. .........................16-21 Am. Meat Inst. v. Horace W. Longacre, Inc. ........................19-37 Am. Motorists Ins. Co. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. ................13-8 Am. Needle & Novelty, Inc. v. Drew Pearson Mktg., Inc. ...10-14 Am. Needle, Inc. v. Nat’l Football League ............................20-14 Am. Online, Inc., In re ............................................................12-65 Am. Online, Inc. v. AT&T Corp. .................................... 2-4, 15-18 Am. Rice, Inc. v. Ark. Rice Growers Co-op. Ass’n ...............14-22 Am. Rice, Inc. v. Producers Rice Mill, Inc. ...........................17-16 (Kane, Rel. #3, 6/15) T–3 KANE ON TRADEMARK LAW Am. Safety Table Co. v. Schreiber ..........................................12-58 Ameritech, Inc. v. Am. Info.Techs. Corp. .............1-12, 9-4, 12-28 AMF, Inc. v. Am. Leisure Prods., Inc. .....................................12-5 Amgen, Inc. v. Elanex Pharm., Inc. .......................................14-67 Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. .......................14-63 AMI/Rec-Pro, Inc. v. Ill. Tool Works, Inc. .............................14-66 Amoco Oil Co. v. Rainbow Snow, Inc. .....................................18-6 Amorgianos v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. ............................16-30 AMP, Inc. v. Foy ..........................................................................8-5 Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc. .....................1-12, 8-9, 8-27, ..........................................................................12-4, 14-6, 16-16 Amylin Pharm., Inc. v. Univ. of Minn. ...................................14-63 Anderson, In re ........................................................................15-23 Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. ................................. 15-15, 15-24 Andre Matenciot, Inc. v. David & Dash, Inc. .......................17-12 Angel Flight of Ga. v. Angel Flight Am. Inc. ................................12-26, 12-29, 12-71 Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Balducci Publ’ns ................6-25, 9-12, 9-30, 9-31, 12-8, 12-11 Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. John Labatt Ltd. .................................2-6 Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. L&L Wings, Inc. ................... 12-9, 12-11 Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Stroh Brewery Co. .............................5-20 Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Gen. Mills Fun Grp., Inc. .................................2-13, 5-2, 5-21 Antioch Co. v. W. Tramming Corp. .................................. 3-6, 3-15 Antitrust Grand Jury, In re .....................................................14-61 Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. ..........................................14-57 Aquatherm Indus., Inc. v. Fla.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Meeting Competition and Buyer Liability Albert I
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 22 | Issue 1 1970 Beatrice Foods: Meeting Competition and Buyer Liability Albert I. Borowitz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Albert I. Borowitz, Beatrice Foods: Meeting Competition and Buyer Liability, 22 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 54 (1970) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol22/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. [Vol. 22: 54 Beatrice Foods: Meeting Competition and Buyer Liability Albert I. Borowitz N EXPERIENCED antitrust practitioner' has observed that the traditional allocation of Robinson-Patman responsibility be- tween seller and buyer appears to have been influenced by the treat- ment of kidnapping under the Imperial Chinese Codes. It seems that kidnapping was rampant in China until an ingenious THE AUTHOR: ALBERT I. BoRowITz legislator solved the problem (A.B., M.A., and LL.B., Harvard Uni- by making the payment of ran- versity) is a member of the Ohio Bar and a practicing attorney in Cleveland, som a capital offense. Ohio. For years, the administra- tion of the Robinson-Patman Act' has followed a similar pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study of Nestlé1
    CASE STUDY OF NESTLÉ1 INDEX PART A 1. Introduction 3 2. History 3 3. Industry Analysis and Competitors 5 3.1 Challenges of the food and beverage industry 6 3.2 Sales evolution of the industry 6 3.3 Qualitative Analysis: SWOT industry 8 3.4 Main competitors 9 3.5 Market Share 9 4. Business Model 10 4.1 Mission 10 4.2 Distinctive Factors 10 4.3 Corporate Governance 11 4.4 Corporate Social Responsibility 11 4.5 Segmentation of products 13 5. Questions 13 6. Bibliography 13 7. Notes 14 1 Case written by Clara Aguilar, Cristina Hey, Laura Plaza and Sara Zayas and supervised by Oriol Amat, BSM Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2018 8. Annex 14 8.1 Balance Sheet 14 8.2 Income Statement 17 8.3 Cash Flow Statement 18 8.4 Ratios 20 PART B 1. Answer to the Questions Raised 22 2 PART A 1. INTRODUCTION “Nestlé” is a Swiss multinational food and beverage company whose business started in 1866. It is one of the largest food companies in the world, with presence in 191 countries, and more than 2,000 brands. Some of these are globally iconic while others are just regional, presenting a great variety of products, such as tea, coffee, bottled water, medical and baby food, breakfast cereals, and lots more. It is a well-known company world-wide, specially because of Nestlé milk chocolate bar, which is one of the most famous products. The company focuses on the production and supply of great quality and healthy food products. Nestle has a huge portfolio and is seen as an enormous competitor across the food industries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oakmark International Fund Shareholder Operations and Assistant Secretary Letter from the Portfolio Managers
    Merrill Corporation - Harris/Oakmark 3rd Qtr Report ED N30B2 7/02 | rhed | 29-Jul-02 09:55 | 02chi3584.a | Sequence: 1 CHKSUM Content: 33594 Layout: 1164 Graphics: 3130 PRECISE THIRD QUARTER REPORT JUNE 30, 2002 P.O. Box 8510 Boston, MA 02266-8510 1-800-OAKMARK The Oakmark Funds are distributed by Harris Advised by Harris Associates L.P. www.oakmark.com Associates Securities L.P., member NASD. Date of first use: July 2002. NAME: Harris/Oakmark 3rd Qtr Report ED N30B2 7/02 PROJ: p2050chi02 JOB: 02chi3584 CYCLE#;BL#: 11; 11 TRIM: 15.5" x 9.75" DOC TYPE: Other AS: Merrill Chicago: 312-786-6300 Merrill Corporation - Harris/Oakmark 3rd Qtr Report ED N30B2 7/02 | rhed | 29-Jul-02 09:55 | 02chi3584.a | Sequence: 2 CHKSUM Content: 52429 Layout: 18829 Graphics: No Graphics PRECISE THE OAKMARK FAMILY OF FUNDS THE OAKMARK FAMILY OF FUNDS 2002 Third Quarter Report Trustees and Officers Letter from the President . 1 Trustees Other Information Summary Information . 2 Victor A. Morgenstern—Chairman Michael J. Friduss Investment Adviser Commentary on The Oakmark and Oakmark Select Funds . 4 Thomas H. Hayden Harris Associates L.P. The Oakmark Fund Christine M. Maki Two North LaSalle Street Letter from the Portfolio Managers . 6 Allan J. Reich Chicago, Illinois 60602-3790 Schedule of Investments . 7 Marv Rotter Burton W. Ruder Transfer Agent The Oakmark Select Fund Peter S. Voss CDC IXIS Asset Management Services, Inc. Letter from the Portfolio Managers . 10 Gary Wilner, M.D. Attention: The Oakmark Family of Funds Schedule of Investments . 11 P.O. Box 8510 The Oakmark Small Cap Fund Officers Boston, Massachusetts 02266-8510 Letter from the Portfolio Managers .
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster County, PA Archives
    Fictitious Names in Business Index 1917-1983 Derived from original indexes within the Lancaster County Archives collection 1001 Hobbies & Crafts, Inc. Corp 1 656 1059 Columbia Avenue Associates 15 420 120 Antiquities 8 47 121 Studio Gallery 16 261 1226 Gallery Gifts 16 278 1722 Motor Lodge Corp 1 648 1810 Associates 15 444 20th Century Card Co 4 138 20thLancaster Century Housing County,6 PA332 Archives 20th Century Television Service 9 180 222 Service Center 14 130 25th Hour 14 43 28th Division Highway Motor Court 9 225 3rd Regular Infantry Corp 1 568 4 R's Associates 16 227 4 Star Linen Supply 12 321 501 Diner 11 611 57 South George Street Associates 16 302 611 Shop & Gallery 16 192 7 Cousins Park City Corp 1 335 78-80 West Main, Inc. Corp 1 605 840 Realty 16 414 A & A Aluminum 15 211 A & A Credit Exchange 4 449 A & B Associates 13 342 A & B Automotive Warehouse Company Corp 1 486 A & B Electronic Products Leasing 15 169 A & B Manufacturing Company 12 162 A & E Advertising 15 54 A & H Collectors Center 12 557 A & H Disposal 15 56 A & H Drywall Finishers 12 588 A & L Marketing 15 426 A & L Trucking 16 358 A & M Enterprises 15 148 A & M New Car Brokers 15 128 A & M Rentals 12 104 A & P Roofing Company 14 211 A & R Flooring Service 15 216 A & R Nissley, Inc. Corp 1 512 A & R Nissley, Inc. Corp 1 720 A & R Nissley, Inc. Corp 2 95 A & R Tour Services Co.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF-Xchange 4.0 Examples
    WorldReginfo - f65a79fa-dec3-4614-8df6-74077a403cfa - WorldReginfo Annual Review 2015 Nestlé – Annual Review 2015 Our business Nestlé has grown from a company founded 150 years ago to a global leader in Nutrition, Health and Wellness. Wherever you are in What we sell (in CHF billion) the world we have safe, nutritious products to Powdered and Nutrition and Milk products Prepared dishes Liquid Beverages Health Science and Ice cream and cooking aids help you care for yourself and your family. Our product portfolio has seven categories, offering you 19.2 14.9 14.6 12.6 healthier and tastier choices at every stage of your life, at every time of the day. PetCare Confectionery Water 11.5 8.9 7.1 Our growth has enabled Where we sell (in CHF billion) us to help improve the lives of millions of people through the products EMENA and services we provide, 27.5 and through employment, our supplier networks and the contribution we make to economies around the world. AMS AOA 39.1 22.2 Number of employees Number of countries we sell in 335 000 189 Total group salaries and social Corporate taxes paid in 2015 welfare expenses (in CHF) (in CHF) 16 billion 3.3 billion WorldReginfo - f65a79fa-dec3-4614-8df6-74077a403cfa Our commitments Our 39 commitments in the Nestlé in society report guide all of us at Nestlé in our collective efforts to meet specific objectives. For a company to prosper Nutrition, health and wellness over the long term and create value for shareholders, it 192 billion 8041 must create value for society at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT PURSUANT to SECTION 13 OR 15(D) of the SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT of 1934
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended February 2, 2007 Commission file number: 001-11421 DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) TENNESSEE 61-0502302 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 100 MISSION RIDGE GOODLETTSVILLE, TN 37072 (Address of principal executive offices, zip code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 855-4000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of the exchange on which registered Common Stock New York Stock Exchange Series B Junior Participating New York Stock Exchange Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Company 013230
    PLEASE CONFIRM CSIP ELIGIBILITY ON THE DEALER SITE WITH THE "CSIP ELIGIBILITY COMPANIES" CAN COMPANY 013230 . Muller Inc 022147 110 Sand Campany 014916 1994 Steel Factory Corporation 005004 3 M Company 022447 3d Company Inc. 020170 4 Fun Limousine 021504 412 Motoring Llc 021417 4l Equipment Leasing Llc 022310 5 Star Auto Contruction Inc/Certified Collision Center 019764 5 Star Refrigeration & Ac, Inc. 021821 79411 Usa Inc. 022480 7-Eleven Inc. 024086 7g Distributing Llc 019408 908 Equipment (Dtf) 024335 A & B Business Equipment 022190 A & E Mechanical Inc. 010468 A & E Stores, Inc 018519 A & R Food Service 018553 A & Z Pharmaceutical Llc 005010 A A A - Corp. Only 022494 A A Electric Inc. 022751 A Action Plumbing Inc. 009218 A B C Contracting Co Inc 015111 A B C Parts Intl Inc. 018881 A Blair Enterprises Inc 019044 A Calarusso & Son Inc 020079 A Confidential Transportation, Inc. 022525 A D S Environmental Inc. 005049 A E P Industries 022983 A Folino Contruction Inc. 005054 A G F A Corporation 013841 A J Perri Inc 010814 A La Mode Inc 024394 A Life Style Services Inc. 023059 A Limousine Service Inc. 020129 A M Castle & Company 007372 A O N Corporation 007741 A O Smith Water Products 019513 A One Exterminators Inc 015788 A P S Security Inc 005207 A T & T Corp 022926 A Taste Of Excellence 015051 A Tech Concrete Co. 021962 A Total Plumbing Llc 012763 A V R Realty Company 023788 A Wainer Llc 016424 A&A Company/Shore Point 017173 A&A Limousines Inc 020687 A&A Maintenance Enterprise Inc 023422 A&H Nyc Limo / A&H American Limo 018432 A&M Supernova Pc 019403 A&M Transport ( Dtf) 016689 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program July 26-29, 2021 | Pacific Daylight Time  2021 Asee Virtual Conference President’S Welcome
    CONFERENCE PROGRAM JULY 26-29, 2021 | PACIFIC DAYLIGHT TIME 2021 ASEE VIRTUAL CONFERENCE PRESIDENT’S WELCOME SMALL SCREEN, SAME BOLD IDEAS It is my honor, as ASEE President, to welcome you to the 128th ASEE Annual Conference. This will be our second and, almost certainly, final virtual conference. While we know there are limits to a virtual platform, by now we’ve learned to navigate online events to make the most of our experience. Last year’s ASEE Annual Conference was a success by almost any measure, and all of us—ASEE staff, leaders, volunteers, and you, our attendees—contributed to a great meeting. We are confident that this year’s event will be even better. Whether attending in person or on a computer, one thing remains the same, and that’s the tremendous amount of great content that ASEE’s Annual Conference unfailingly delivers. From our fantastic plenary speakers, paper presentations, and technical sessions to our inspiring lineup of Distinguished Lectures and panel discussions, you will have many learning opportunities and take-aways. I hope you enjoy this week’s events and please feel free to “find” me and reach out with any questions or comments! Sincerely, SHERYL SORBY ASEE President 2020-2021 2 Schedule subject to change. Please go to https://2021asee.pathable.co/ for up-to-date information. 2021 ASEE VIRTUAL CONFERENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS 2021 ASEE VIRTUAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION PROGRAM ASEE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ................................................................................4 CONFERENCE-AT-A-GLANCE ................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification Trends in U.S. Food [\/Lanufacturing
    |jL|ti|;¿«s, Departmentynl,«istates. of ^^ PrOClUCt Agriculture Economic Research Service ai- Diversification Trends Agricultural Economic Report in U.S. Food Number 521 i' [\/lanufacturing James M. MacDonald xy '.M>> Additional copies. • • of this report can be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Ask for Product Diver- sification Trends in U.S. Food Manufacturing (AER-521). Write to the above address for price and ordering instructions. For faster service, call the GPO order desk at (202) 783-3238 and charge your purchase to your VISA, Master- Card, or GPO deposit account, A 25-percent bulk discount is available on orders of 100 or more copies shipped to a single address. Add 25 percent for postage for foreign orders. Microfiche copies ($4.50 each) can be purchased from the Identification Sec- tion, National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Spring- field, VA 22161, Ask for Product Diversification Trends in U.S. Food Manufac- turing (AER-521). Enclose check or money order payable to NTIS. For faster service, call NTIS at (703) 487-4780 and charge your purchase to your VISA, MasterCard, American Express, or NTIS deposit account. The Economic Research Service has no copies for free mailing. Product Diversification Trends in U.S. Food Manufacturing. By James M. MacDonald. National Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 521. Abstract Leading U.S. food manufacturers typically produce and sell a growing array of food products. Many have also expanded into related wholesale, transporta- tion, and food service industries, while avoiding large-scale involvement in agriculture and food retailing.
    [Show full text]
  • CPY Document
    NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORP. Syllabus It is ordered That the initial decision be modified by striking the last sentence of the fourth fuD paragraph on pag'e 61 and the fifth fuD paragraph on page 61. It is further ordered That the initial decision be modified by striking the order on page 61 and substituting therefor the fol1owing: It is ordered That respondent Montgomery Ward & Co. Incorporated, a corporation , and its offcers, representatives agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device , in connection with the offering for sale, sale, or distribution of any articles of merchandise in commerce, as commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act do forthwith cease and desist from: Representing, directly or by implication that any of res- pondent's merchandise is guaranteed unless the nature and extent of the guarantee, the identity of the guaran- tor, and the manner in which the guarantor wil perform thereunder are clearly and conspicuously disclosed. It is furtiJer ordered That the hearing examiner s initial deci- sion , as modified by this order and the accompanying opinion be and it hereby is, adopted as the decision of the Commission. It is further ordered That the respondent shaD within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, file with the Com- mission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist set forth herein. Commissioners Elman and ReiDy dissented and have filed dis- senting opinions. IN THE MATTER OF KATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORPORATION ORDER , OPINIONS , ETC.
    [Show full text]
  • US Firms Performance During Recessions: a Comparative Case Study
    US firms performance during recessions: a comparative case study by Catherine Obiribea Ofori-Bah B.A., University of Ghana, 2017 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Agricultural Economics College of Agriculture KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2020 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Vincent Amanor-Boadu Copyright © Catherine Obiribea Ofori-Bah 2020. Abstract With the majority of economists predicting that the US economy will experience a recession by 2021, it has become increasingly important to explore how well firms do during recessions. Improving understanding of firm characteristics that sustain performance during recessions could provide some learning from the strategies pursued by these firms that maintain their performance during recessions. The study is a case analysis of six US firms, four in the agri- food sector, and two in the technology sector. While numerous performance measures exist, the study intentionally uses return on sales as the performance measure of interest because of its unique characteristic of capturing firms’ current situation over which they have current control. Return on sales, defined as the ratio of net income to sales revenue in the current period, limits performance assessment to current results, allowing for the direct impact of recessions to be measured. The study theorizes that certain firms fare better than others because of their product mix. It also hypothesizes that return on sales as a performance indicator during recessions is determined by how well firms do with their assets and other financial resources. These are tested using 30 years of financial data from Wharton Research Data Services (WRDS), hosted by the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court District of Connecticut
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC., Plaintiff, v. No. 3:19-cv-01434 (JAM) J-B WELD COMPANY, LLC, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION This case arises at an uncommon intersection between the repair of car mufflers and principles of intellectual property law. For several decades now, plaintiff Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) has trademarked the term “MUFFLER WELD” for a product it sells to seal cracks on car mufflers. But last year J-B Weld Company, LLC (J-B Weld) began to sell its own formulation of a muffler sealant using the mark “MufflerWeld.” In light of the similarity of these terms, ITW has now moved for a preliminary injunction to bar J-B Weld from continuing to market its product under the “MufflerWeld” name during the pendency of this litigation. ITW argues that it is likely to succeed on its trademark infringement claim and that it is being irreparably harmed. In response, J-B Weld argues that the difference in trade dress (packaging) between its product and ITW’s product defeats any claim of trademark infringement, and that ITW has not shown irreparable injury in any event. For the reasons described below, I will grant ITW’s motion for a preliminary injunction. BACKGROUND The facts relevant to this motion for a preliminary injunction are largely uncontested. ITW has, since 1976, sold a sealant for automotive exhaust systems under the name “MUFFLER WELD.” Doc. #4-2 at 1 (¶ 3) (“Agrafojo Decl.”). In 1977, the United States Patent and Trademark Office entered a trademark for MUFFLER WELD on the Principal Register, “for paste sealer for repairing muffler holes,” noting that the application disclaimed the word “muffler” aside from the mark as shown.
    [Show full text]