CPY Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CPY Document NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORP. Syllabus It is ordered That the initial decision be modified by striking the last sentence of the fourth fuD paragraph on pag'e 61 and the fifth fuD paragraph on page 61. It is further ordered That the initial decision be modified by striking the order on page 61 and substituting therefor the fol1owing: It is ordered That respondent Montgomery Ward & Co. Incorporated, a corporation , and its offcers, representatives agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device , in connection with the offering for sale, sale, or distribution of any articles of merchandise in commerce, as commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act do forthwith cease and desist from: Representing, directly or by implication that any of res- pondent's merchandise is guaranteed unless the nature and extent of the guarantee, the identity of the guaran- tor, and the manner in which the guarantor wil perform thereunder are clearly and conspicuously disclosed. It is furtiJer ordered That the hearing examiner s initial deci- sion , as modified by this order and the accompanying opinion be and it hereby is, adopted as the decision of the Commission. It is further ordered That the respondent shaD within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, file with the Com- mission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist set forth herein. Commissioners Elman and ReiDy dissented and have filed dis- senting opinions. IN THE MATTER OF KATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORPORATION ORDER , OPINIONS , ETC. , IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SECS. 2(a) and 2(d) OF THE CLAYTON ACT Docket 7018. Cmnplrn , Dec. 1957-Dedsion , July , 1966 Order requiring a company engaged in processing and distributing dairy and food products with h(- adquartcl's in New York City, to cease discriminat- ing in prices and promotional allowances between competing retailers handling the product line of its Scaltest Foods Division , in violation of Sees. 2(a) and 2(d) of the Clayton Act. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Complaint 70 F. COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that National Dairy Products Corporation has violated and is now vio- lating the provisions of subsections (a) and (d) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act (U. S. Title 15 , Section 13), hereby issues its complaint charging as fo11ows com,T I Charging violation of subsection (a) of Section 2 of the Clay- ton Act, the Commission a11eges: PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent named herein is National Dairy Products Corporation. Respondent is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the Jaws of the State of Delaware. Respondent' s principal offce and place of business is located at 260 Madison Avenue ew York City, New York. PAR. 2. Respondent is extensively engaged in the business of purchasing, manufacturing, processing, distributing, and se1Hng dairy and alled products in various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. Since respondent's incorporation on December 8 , 1923, it has acquired the entire stock or control of assets of numerous con- cerns. Respondent, formerly a holding company, in 1956 carried forward a program of integration and corporate simplification taking over properties and assets of more than forty principal domestic subsidiaries and continuing their operations as divisions. Respondent has also caused a number of its subsidiaries to be merged with one another. As of December 31 , 1956 , respondent held 10070 of the voting stock in its remaining subsidiaries, being about forty in number. Respondent's program of integrating its subsidiaries is now who11y or substantia11y completed. Respondent conducts its business through its divisions and sub- sidiaries. Through its Sealtest division, respondent se11s milk, vi- tamin D milk, homogenized mi1k, concentrated fresh milk , choco- late milk, buttermilk, cream, butter, eggs , cottage cheese , special milks, and other dairy products to homes , restaurants , stores hospitals, hotels, and institutions in States in the Eastern, Mid- western, and Southern parts of the Vnited States, including the District of Columbia. Respondent has numerous ice cream brands sold sectionally in various parts of about 33 States and in the Dis- trict of Columbia , primarily in the Eastern part of the United States. NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORP. Complaint Respondent is the larg-est distributor and se1ler of dairy prod- ucts in the United States. Respondent' s net sales for 1956 were 352 878 027. 00. PAR. 3. Respondent se1ls dairy products of like g-rade and qual- ity to a large number of purchasers located in many States of the United States, particularly in those of the East, South, and Mid- west, and in the District of Columbia for use , consumption, or re- sale therein. Respondent maintains and operates a large number of receiving stations, manufacturing, and processing plants and distribution depots located in or near the cities, towns, and places where it sells its said products. The bulk of respondent' s said products are delivered to its customers in its own trucks. PAR 4. In the course and conduct of its business respondent is now and for many years past has been shipping dairy products from the State or States where such products are manufactured processed, or stored in anticipation of sale and shipment, to pur- chasers located in other States of the United States and in other places under the jurisdiction of the United States , including the District of Columbia in a constant current of commerce as " com- merce" is defined in the Clayton Act. Respondent also se1ls its said products in commerce as "commerce" is defined in the Clay- ton Act to purchasers located in the same states where such prod- ucts are manufactured , processed , or stored in anticipation of sale. Included among respondent' s plants and facilities for the manu- facture, processing, and sale of dairy products, respondent owns and operates a manufacturing- and processing plant located in the city of Toledo , Ohio , wherc it manufactures and processes sub- stantial quantities of its diary products which respondent se1ls in Ohio and Michigan. Other substantial quantities of said products are manufactured and processed in other States by other divi- sions , plants , or subsidiaries of respondent , which respondent ships or causes to be shipped to respondent' s Toledo, Ohio, plant for subsequent distribution and sale. Some of such products are shipped in packages ready for sale and others are shipped in bulk and are further processed in respondent' s Toledo plant for subse- quent sale. Raw milk is purchased by respondent from farmers and dairymen located both in Ohio and in other States, including Michigan , which is shipped and transported to respondent's To- ledo, Ohio , plant where it is processed and subsequently sold to purchasers located in Ohio and Michigan. Respondent owns or op- - - FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Complaint 70 F. erates a depot and sales offce in Monroe, Michigan, to which its said products are transported or caused to be transported by res- pondent from its Toledo , Ohio, plant for subsequent sale in Michi- gan. Respondent transports, or causes to be transported, substan- tial quantities of its said products in respondent' s own trucks from respondent' s Toledo, Ohio, plant into Michigan which re- spondent seIJs and delivers to customers located in Michigan. In other instances respondent seDs its said dairy products to distrib- utors who transport said products from Toledo, Ohio, to various cities, towns, and places in Michigan, principal1y nearby to Mon- roe, Michigan , who sel1 the same to customers in those areas. Res- pondent has been and is engaged in a constant and uninterrupted trade in its said products in interstate commerce in sales of its dairy products in the States of Ohio and Michigan, as herein al- leged. PAR. 5. The bulk of respondent' s wholesale business is done with retailers such as stores, restaurants, hote1s, and other busi- nesses and establishments which reseIJ to consumers. Respondent, in thc sale of its said products to retailers and con- sumers , is in substantial competition with other manufacturers processors , distributors , and sel1ers of dairy products. Many of respondent's retailer- customers as herein described are in sub- stantial competition with one another in the resale of respon- dent' s said products to consumers. PAR. 6. In the course and conduct of its business in commerce respondent has discriminated in price in the sale of dairy prod- ucts by scIJing such pl"ducts of like grade and quality at different prices to diffcrent and competing purchasers. Included among such sales at discriminatory prices were sales of milk and other dairy products by respondent, particularly those made by and through its Sealtest division , in the cities of Toledo, Ohio, and Monroe, :YIichigan , and in nearby cities, towns and places in Ohio and Michigan. One of the methods and plans used by respondent to effect and carry out such discrimination in price is a quantity discount or re- bate scbedule or system applicable to its retailer-customers lo- cated or doing business in the areas of Ohio and Michigan here- inbefore described , which respondent formulated and put into ef- fect on or about Novcmber 1 , 1954, and which with certain changes therein, is stil in force and effect. Respondent' s quantity discount and rebate plan is applied to the monthly purchases by its retailer-customers
Recommended publications
  • Meeting Competition and Buyer Liability Albert I
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 22 | Issue 1 1970 Beatrice Foods: Meeting Competition and Buyer Liability Albert I. Borowitz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Albert I. Borowitz, Beatrice Foods: Meeting Competition and Buyer Liability, 22 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 54 (1970) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol22/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. [Vol. 22: 54 Beatrice Foods: Meeting Competition and Buyer Liability Albert I. Borowitz N EXPERIENCED antitrust practitioner' has observed that the traditional allocation of Robinson-Patman responsibility be- tween seller and buyer appears to have been influenced by the treat- ment of kidnapping under the Imperial Chinese Codes. It seems that kidnapping was rampant in China until an ingenious THE AUTHOR: ALBERT I. BoRowITz legislator solved the problem (A.B., M.A., and LL.B., Harvard Uni- by making the payment of ran- versity) is a member of the Ohio Bar and a practicing attorney in Cleveland, som a capital offense. Ohio. For years, the administra- tion of the Robinson-Patman Act' has followed a similar pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oakmark International Fund Shareholder Operations and Assistant Secretary Letter from the Portfolio Managers
    Merrill Corporation - Harris/Oakmark 3rd Qtr Report ED N30B2 7/02 | rhed | 29-Jul-02 09:55 | 02chi3584.a | Sequence: 1 CHKSUM Content: 33594 Layout: 1164 Graphics: 3130 PRECISE THIRD QUARTER REPORT JUNE 30, 2002 P.O. Box 8510 Boston, MA 02266-8510 1-800-OAKMARK The Oakmark Funds are distributed by Harris Advised by Harris Associates L.P. www.oakmark.com Associates Securities L.P., member NASD. Date of first use: July 2002. NAME: Harris/Oakmark 3rd Qtr Report ED N30B2 7/02 PROJ: p2050chi02 JOB: 02chi3584 CYCLE#;BL#: 11; 11 TRIM: 15.5" x 9.75" DOC TYPE: Other AS: Merrill Chicago: 312-786-6300 Merrill Corporation - Harris/Oakmark 3rd Qtr Report ED N30B2 7/02 | rhed | 29-Jul-02 09:55 | 02chi3584.a | Sequence: 2 CHKSUM Content: 52429 Layout: 18829 Graphics: No Graphics PRECISE THE OAKMARK FAMILY OF FUNDS THE OAKMARK FAMILY OF FUNDS 2002 Third Quarter Report Trustees and Officers Letter from the President . 1 Trustees Other Information Summary Information . 2 Victor A. Morgenstern—Chairman Michael J. Friduss Investment Adviser Commentary on The Oakmark and Oakmark Select Funds . 4 Thomas H. Hayden Harris Associates L.P. The Oakmark Fund Christine M. Maki Two North LaSalle Street Letter from the Portfolio Managers . 6 Allan J. Reich Chicago, Illinois 60602-3790 Schedule of Investments . 7 Marv Rotter Burton W. Ruder Transfer Agent The Oakmark Select Fund Peter S. Voss CDC IXIS Asset Management Services, Inc. Letter from the Portfolio Managers . 10 Gary Wilner, M.D. Attention: The Oakmark Family of Funds Schedule of Investments . 11 P.O. Box 8510 The Oakmark Small Cap Fund Officers Boston, Massachusetts 02266-8510 Letter from the Portfolio Managers .
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster County, PA Archives
    Fictitious Names in Business Index 1917-1983 Derived from original indexes within the Lancaster County Archives collection 1001 Hobbies & Crafts, Inc. Corp 1 656 1059 Columbia Avenue Associates 15 420 120 Antiquities 8 47 121 Studio Gallery 16 261 1226 Gallery Gifts 16 278 1722 Motor Lodge Corp 1 648 1810 Associates 15 444 20th Century Card Co 4 138 20thLancaster Century Housing County,6 PA332 Archives 20th Century Television Service 9 180 222 Service Center 14 130 25th Hour 14 43 28th Division Highway Motor Court 9 225 3rd Regular Infantry Corp 1 568 4 R's Associates 16 227 4 Star Linen Supply 12 321 501 Diner 11 611 57 South George Street Associates 16 302 611 Shop & Gallery 16 192 7 Cousins Park City Corp 1 335 78-80 West Main, Inc. Corp 1 605 840 Realty 16 414 A & A Aluminum 15 211 A & A Credit Exchange 4 449 A & B Associates 13 342 A & B Automotive Warehouse Company Corp 1 486 A & B Electronic Products Leasing 15 169 A & B Manufacturing Company 12 162 A & E Advertising 15 54 A & H Collectors Center 12 557 A & H Disposal 15 56 A & H Drywall Finishers 12 588 A & L Marketing 15 426 A & L Trucking 16 358 A & M Enterprises 15 148 A & M New Car Brokers 15 128 A & M Rentals 12 104 A & P Roofing Company 14 211 A & R Flooring Service 15 216 A & R Nissley, Inc. Corp 1 512 A & R Nissley, Inc. Corp 1 720 A & R Nissley, Inc. Corp 2 95 A & R Tour Services Co.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT PURSUANT to SECTION 13 OR 15(D) of the SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT of 1934
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended February 2, 2007 Commission file number: 001-11421 DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) TENNESSEE 61-0502302 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 100 MISSION RIDGE GOODLETTSVILLE, TN 37072 (Address of principal executive offices, zip code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 855-4000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of the exchange on which registered Common Stock New York Stock Exchange Series B Junior Participating New York Stock Exchange Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • Klein ISD ITB 17-299 Food Service: Dairy Products
    Klein ISD ITB 17-299 Food Service: Dairy Products Option 1A - Delivery to all campuses daily - Fixed Prices - All items must be bid at a fixed price for the contract period. Line 1 Line items 1.1 and 1.2 are OPTIONAL Line 1.1 MILK, 11-12 OZ. BOTTLES, SKIM, WHITE Name QTY UOM Unit Price Ext. Price Note to Buyer Borden Milk Products 4200 EA $0.47 $1,974.00 1% sub for skim Hiland dairy Foods 4200 EA $0.79 $3,318.00 Line 1.2 MILK, 11-12 OZ. BOTTLES, FAT FREE, CHOCOLATE FLAVORED Name QTY UOM Unit Price Ext. Price Borden Milk Products 85000 EA $0.47 $39,950.00 Hiland dairy Foods 85000 EA $0.79 $67,150.00 Line 1.3 MILK, HALF-PINT, FAT FREE, CHOCOLATE FLAVORED Name QTY UOM Unit Price Ext. Price Oak Farms Dairy (Dean Foods) 3500000 EA $0.2636 $922,600.00 Borden Milk Products 3500000 EA $0.297 $1,039,500.00 Hiland dairy Foods 3500000 EA $0.33 $1,155,000.00 Line 1.4 MILK, HALF-PINT, FAT FREE, STRAWBERRY FLAVORED Name QTY UOM Unit Price Ext. Price Oak Farms Dairy (Dean Foods) 965000 EA $0.2636 $254,374.00 Borden Milk Products 965000 EA $0.297 $286,605.00 Hiland dairy Foods 965000 EA $0.33 $318,450.00 Line 1.5 MILK, HALF-PINT, SKIM, WHITE Name QTY UOM Unit Price Ext. Price Oak Farms Dairy (Dean Foods) 831000 EA $0.2646 $219,882.60 Borden Milk Products 831000 EA $0.297 $246,807.00 Hiland dairy Foods 831000 EA $0.33 $274,230.00 Line 1.6 BUTTERMILK, HALF-GALLON Name QTY UOM Unit Price Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification Trends in U.S. Food [\/Lanufacturing
    |jL|ti|;¿«s, Departmentynl,«istates. of ^^ PrOClUCt Agriculture Economic Research Service ai- Diversification Trends Agricultural Economic Report in U.S. Food Number 521 i' [\/lanufacturing James M. MacDonald xy '.M>> Additional copies. • • of this report can be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Ask for Product Diver- sification Trends in U.S. Food Manufacturing (AER-521). Write to the above address for price and ordering instructions. For faster service, call the GPO order desk at (202) 783-3238 and charge your purchase to your VISA, Master- Card, or GPO deposit account, A 25-percent bulk discount is available on orders of 100 or more copies shipped to a single address. Add 25 percent for postage for foreign orders. Microfiche copies ($4.50 each) can be purchased from the Identification Sec- tion, National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Spring- field, VA 22161, Ask for Product Diversification Trends in U.S. Food Manufac- turing (AER-521). Enclose check or money order payable to NTIS. For faster service, call NTIS at (703) 487-4780 and charge your purchase to your VISA, MasterCard, American Express, or NTIS deposit account. The Economic Research Service has no copies for free mailing. Product Diversification Trends in U.S. Food Manufacturing. By James M. MacDonald. National Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 521. Abstract Leading U.S. food manufacturers typically produce and sell a growing array of food products. Many have also expanded into related wholesale, transporta- tion, and food service industries, while avoiding large-scale involvement in agriculture and food retailing.
    [Show full text]
  • US Firms Performance During Recessions: a Comparative Case Study
    US firms performance during recessions: a comparative case study by Catherine Obiribea Ofori-Bah B.A., University of Ghana, 2017 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Agricultural Economics College of Agriculture KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2020 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Vincent Amanor-Boadu Copyright © Catherine Obiribea Ofori-Bah 2020. Abstract With the majority of economists predicting that the US economy will experience a recession by 2021, it has become increasingly important to explore how well firms do during recessions. Improving understanding of firm characteristics that sustain performance during recessions could provide some learning from the strategies pursued by these firms that maintain their performance during recessions. The study is a case analysis of six US firms, four in the agri- food sector, and two in the technology sector. While numerous performance measures exist, the study intentionally uses return on sales as the performance measure of interest because of its unique characteristic of capturing firms’ current situation over which they have current control. Return on sales, defined as the ratio of net income to sales revenue in the current period, limits performance assessment to current results, allowing for the direct impact of recessions to be measured. The study theorizes that certain firms fare better than others because of their product mix. It also hypothesizes that return on sales as a performance indicator during recessions is determined by how well firms do with their assets and other financial resources. These are tested using 30 years of financial data from Wharton Research Data Services (WRDS), hosted by the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • 1958Bfar Complete.Pdf
    60*tuW ---@9. Americon Institute of Monogement 8ffice F@ds Co, THIS CERTIFICATE OF MANAGEMENT EXCELLENCE FOR THE YEAR IE57 DIREtrTtrR5 Brown W. Cannon :::'*."1 Denver, Colorodo Arlington Heights, lllinois I Alvie J. Claxton Robert B. Price I Pinehurst, North Corolino El Poso, Texos I Earl Cline Harold F. Stotzer I Iincoln, Nebrosko o"noo'o'on'o Walter L. Dilger Chicogo, lllinois EXEtrurrv= George A. Gardella I trtrMMrrrEE FINANCIAL \''ORLD Detroit, Michigon trF I BtrARD trF I Bmof Inltrstg Willard V. Haskell Topeko. Konsos John F. Hazelton Chicogo, lllinois frre,snrlrd to :'m::Ji::,,, I Beatrice Foods Co. George W. Holmes Lincoln, Nebrosko .,I/INNER OF THE BRONZE OSCAR.OF-INDI,ISTRY FOR TIITffii:::' THE BEST ANNUAL REPORT OF THE William G. Karnes I Dairy Prodrrcts Industry Chicogo. Illinois Selected by the Independent Board of Judges appointcd John H. Lambrecht tVinners by Financial Vorld for the designation of Award Brookfield, Wisconsin from among the 5000 entries in the Seventeenth Annual Report Survey and Competition conducted during 1957, John T. McGreer :=::_ ! Iincoln, Nebrosko G. Stanley McKenzie los Angeles, Cqlifornio &nk,re C.i{lrr CilMMi Harold F. Nichols PBidrar. N.( Yo* khry d ! S(!ily Afuls, lia, Golesburg, lllinois .). r' tre<Xf€ Louis Nielson H.d, &p' ol DriFi. e *i6l PEn |ilillr. Golesburg, lllinois REP.RT $eutrlcs ffiuds fo. The 6lst Annual Stockholders Meeting will be held in Chicago, Illinois, on lune 2, 1958, at l0:30 A.M. (CDT), in the Grand Ballroom of the Palmer House. trFFIEERS tonients William G. Karnes Presidenl directors and officers inside front cover John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Milk Order Distributing Plant Information for 2019 NOTE: "DIP" Indicates Debtor in Possession
    Federal Milk Order Distributing Plant Information For 2019 NOTE: "DIP" indicates debtor in possession Pool Distributing Plants State County Plant Name City State ZipCode FIPS FIPS Cl. I Dftl. Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Aug-19 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Agropur Grand Rapids MI 49548 26 081 1.80 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 Agropur Maplewood MN 55113 27 123 1.70 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Alpenrose Dairy Portland OR 97298 41 051 1.90 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 Andersen Dairy Battle Ground WA 98604 53 011 1.90 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 Anderson-Erickson Dairy Des Moines IA 50317 19 153 1.80 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 Aurora Organic Dairy Platteville CO 80651 08 123 2.45 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 Blue Kingfisher dba Walmart Fort Wayne IN 46819 18 003 1.80 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 Boice Brothers Dairy Kingston NY 12401 36 111 2.80 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Borden Dairy Cowarts AL 36321 01 069 4.30 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Borden Dairy Miami FL 33164 12 025 6.00 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Borden Dairy Winter Haven FL 33881 12 105 5.40 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Borden Dairy London KY 40743 21 125 2.90 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Borden Dairy Lafayette LA 70596 22 055 3.80 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Borden Dairy Hattiesburg MS 39404 28 035 3.80 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Borden Dairy Cincinnati OH 45215 39 061 2.20 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 Borden Dairy Cleveland OH 44111 39 035 2.00 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 Borden Dairy Charleston SC 29419 45 019 4.30 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Borden Dairy Austin TX 78702 48 453 3.30 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 Borden Dairy Conroe TX 77305 48 339 3.60 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 Borden Dairy Dallas TX 75221 48 113 3.00 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 Braum's Tuttle OK 73089 40 051 2.60 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 Broadacre Dairies Powell TN 37849 47 093 3.20 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Byrne Dairy Syracuse NY 13220 36 067 2.50 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Borden Appoints Tom Martin As Vice
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: Jessie Conrad Copperfield Advisory Ph: (617) 792-4011 E-mail: [email protected] Borden Appoints Tom Martin as Vice President of Walmart Former Sam’s Team Lead of Quaker Sales at PepsiCo will help scale Borden’s sales team to drive further growth DALLAS – Aug. 14, 2018 – Borden, a heritaGe American brand and leadinG U.S. dairy processer and distributor, today announced that Tom Martin has been appointed as Vice President of Walmart Inc., effective immediately. Martin is the eiGhth senior leader Borden CEO Tony Sarsam has hired since joininG the Company in March. “Tom is an exceptional leader with extensive industry experience and real success in drivinG sales,” said Sarsam. “We are thrilled to welcome someone with his track record of partnership with Walmart at a time when we are investinG to brinG world-class service to our larGest Customer. Tom brinGs terrific enerGy and leadership to the Borden team, and I know he will be an important asset as we brinG Borden into a new era of innovative Growth.” Martin brings 25 years of industry experience to Borden, havinG most recently served as the Sam’s Team Lead for Quaker products at PepsiCo. Previously, he was the Walmart DireCtor of Customer ManaGement and the Sam’s Director of Customer ManaGement for the Frito-Lay Division at PepsiCo. Martin previously served in a variety of senior sales and general manaGement roles at PepsiCo. “I am very excited to be joininG Borden at this important moment in the Company’s lonG history,” said Martin. “I am inspired by the new leadership team and I look forward to workinG with them to build a new Borden.” Martin holds an MBA from Southwest Baptist University.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Borden Dairy Initiates Voluntary
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: Adrienne Chance Senior Director of Corporate Communications Borden Ph: (214) 957-5518 E-mail: [email protected] Borden Dairy Initiates Voluntary Reorganization Proceedings The Company will continue operating as normal as it works toward achieving a more viable capital structure and stresses “The Borden Difference” as a competitive advantage DALLAS – Jan. 5, 2020 – Borden, one of America’s favorite dairy companies founded in 1857, today announced that it and certain affiliates (collectively, “Borden” or the “Company”) have initiated voluntary reorganization proceedings in the District of Delaware under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Company intends to use the court process to pursue a financial restructuring designed to reduce its current debt load, maximize value and position the Company for long-term success. Borden plans to continue operating in the ordinary course of business, under the court’s supervision, and remains focused on being the most service-oriented dairy Company that offers delicious and nutritious products consumers love. “Borden is EBITDA-positive and growing, but we must achieve a more viable capital structure,” said Borden CEO Tony Sarsam. “This reorganization will strengthen our position for future prosperity. Over the past 163 years, we have earned the distinction of being one of the most well-recognized and reputable national brands. We remain committed to ‘The Borden Difference,’ which is our promise to be the most service-oriented dairy Company that puts people first. We will continue serving our customers, employees and other stakeholders and operating business as usual throughout this process.” Last year marked several major milestones for the Company, including the revival of Borden’s beloved spokescow Elsie, the brand’s reintroduction in Ohio, and the launch of several innovative products that earned local and national media acclaim, such as State Fair-inspired milk flavors, Gingerbread Eggnog and Kid Builder.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants, Handlers, and Bulk Tank Units Under the New York–New Jersey Marketing Orders
    Plants, Handlers, and Bulk Tank Units Under the New York–New Jersey Marketing Orders December 1997 Table of Contents Page Symbols 2 Plant Listing by Handler 3 Plant Listing by Location 6 Bulk Tank Unit Listing by Handler 8 United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service – Dairy Division MARKET ADMINISTRATOR NEW YORK–NEW JERSEY MILK MARKETING AREA New York State Federal New Jersey State Order No. 126 Order No. 2 Order No. 57–3 Symbols NOTE: Symbols refer to a plant's operations during December 1997. There may be some variation in other months. Handlers E — handlers with partially-excluded or wholly-excluded own farm milk P-H — producer-handlers as defined in Section 1002.12 of the Orders Plants D — designated pool plants as defined in Section 1002.24 of the Orders T — temporary pool plants as defined in Section 1002.28 of the Orders N O — plants with no pool obligation Milk Sources O-F — milk produced on own farm BTU — milk from bulk tank units Plt — milk from other plants received in bulk form X — type of milk source Type of Plant Tr. (Transferring Plant) — where milk is assembled for shipment in bulk form to other locations Pr. (Processing Plant) — predominant operation is processing fluid milk products Mf. (Manufacturing Plant) — predominant operation is making Class II, III and III-A products X — plant's primary operation # — plant with transferring of milk as a secondary operation that accounts for at least 10 percent of its total volume, provided that it transfers at least 250,000 pounds (in bulk and/or packaged form) * — plant with manufacturing as a secondary operation that accounts for at least 10 percent of its total volume 2 TABLE 1.
    [Show full text]