DOCSLIB.ORG

Geospatial Model of the Universal Soil Loss Equation for Fremont County, Colorado and the Universal Soil Loss Equation Applied to Fuels Reduction Treatments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geospatial Model of the Universal Soil Loss Equation for Fremont County, Colorado and the Universal Soil Loss Equation Applied to Fuels Reduction Treatments Geospatial Model of the Universal Soil Loss Equation for Fremont County, Colorado and the Universal Soil Loss Equation Applied to Fuels Reduction Treatments A Master’s Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The College of Science and Mathematics Colorado State University-Pueblo Pueblo, Colorado In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Master of Science in Applied Natural Science By Annie Thayer Merriam Colorado State University-Pueblo May 2005 Certificate of Acceptance This thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Applied Natural Science by Annie Thayer Merriam Has been accepted by the Graduate Faculty of the College of Science and Mathematics Colorado State University-Pueblo. Approval of Thesis Committee: Graduate Advisor (Dr. Brian Vanden Heuvel) Date Committee Member (Dr. Neal Osborn) Date Committee Member (Dr. Moussa Diawara) Date Graduate Director (Dr. Mel Druelinger) Date Dedication For Butch, my nightlight in a strange house, For without you I would be sitting in the dark with a stubbed toe. Acknowledgements Foremost I would like to thank my supervisor at the Bureau of Land Management, John Smeins. John is responsible for giving me the opportunity to complete this research and he also helped refine my focus of this research to what it is today. John has also taught the true definition of fuels reduction: “eliminating small, weak, trees, so that, few, large, strong, ones may grow.” I would also like to thank everyone else who supported me at BLM. To my committee, the deepest thank you. To Dr. Neal Osborn who was the first to show me the wonderful world of botany and is the reason I have the profession that I do. He has also made me the botanist I am today. To Dr. Brian Vanden Heuvel who became a part of my committee before he even started as a professor at Colorado State University-Pueblo. He has greatly contributed to the efforts of this thesis and has over the past year made me a better teacher. To Dr. Moussa Diawara who has taught me a great deal about environmental management, toxicology and has been a great mentor and foremost taught me that you can forget to bring a lot of things to class, just don’t forget a sense of humor. I would also like to acknowledge Jennifer Dillon who is one of my best friends and someone who has been through thick and thin with me professionally and personally. I will always remember the trials and tribulation of fieldwork and all the good times. Because of you I still can’t look at a Cholla or Grandmother’s Peanut Butter Cookies without laughing. Along with Jennifer I would like to thank Sara for always being there. iv I would like to thank everyone at the BLM who has contributed to this research and supported me as well as contributed. A special thank you goes to John Shaw who performed numerous canopy calculations for me and without his work this thesis would not be the same. Finally I would like to thank everyone else who made this work possible, my friends, my family and last but certainly not least Butch Berlemann. Who, after all this still wants to spend the rest of his life with me. Your support and patience still amazes me. v Geospatial Model of the Universal Soil Loss Equation for Fremont County, Colorado and the Universal Soil Loss Equation Applied to Fuels Reduction Treatments Annie Thayer Merriam Colorado State University-Pueblo, 2005 Fuels reduction treatments have been practiced by the Bureau of Land Management, Royal Gorge Field Office since 1998 and have been monitored since 2002. The purpose of these treatments is to eliminate or reduce some of the unnatural fuel loading that has occurred in the west with over zealous fire suppression. Currently fuels reduction treatment areas have been placed in the Urban/Wildland Interface as directed by the United States congress. The goal of this research was to examine soil erosion by utilizing the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) on fuels reduction treatments in, and create a geospatial model to qualitatively predict erosion risk of Fremont County to aid in further planning of fuels reduction treatments. It is hypothesized that certain soils will have an increase in erosion due to fuels reduction treatments. The results of this research show that only two soils of 17 studied had a significant difference in soil erosion from pre-treatment status to post-one-year and post-two-year status. It was found that in the two soils, the Bronell and Boyle series, there was a statistically significant decreased in soil erosion due to the reduction of fuels. The other soils indicated that erosion risk was improved but not significantly. vi Table of Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………...iv Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….vi List of Tables…………………………………………………………………..……..ix List of Figures…………………………………………………………………..……..x Introduction………………………………………………….……………..………….1 Background and Mission of the Bureau of Land Management………...……..1 Standards for Public Land Health……………………………………….…….2 National Fire Plan……………………………………………………………..4 Ecological Dynamics of Fremont County, Colorado…………………….……5 Historical Rangeland Improvements…………………………………….…….9 Current Fuels Reduction Management………………………………………11 Types of Soils………………………………………………………………..12 Types of Treatments…………………………………………………..……..17 Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE)…………………………………...…..29 Objectives…………………………………………………………………....32 Materials and Methods……………………………………………………………….34 Sampling Methods…………………………………………………………...34 Understory Analysis and Species Diversity………………………………….35 Canopy Sampling…………………………………………………………….36 Photographic Points………………………………………………………….36 Universal Soil Loss Equation...………………………………………………36 vii Statistical Analysis…………………………………………………………...38 Geographical Information Systems Modeling……………………………….39 Data Storage Management…………………………………………………...41 Results………………………………………………………………………………..42 USLE of Fuel Reduction Projects by Soil Series…………………………….42 USLE Comparative Analysis of Treatment Type……………………………49 Geospatial Model of the USLE for Fremont County, Colorado……………..52 Discussion……………………………………………………………………………53 Review of Objectives………………………………………………………...53 USLE of Fuels Reduction Projects by Soil Series…………………………...53 USLE Comparative Analysis of Treatment Type……………………………55 Geospatial Model of the USLE of Fremont County, Colorado…………..….56 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….. 57 Appendix A. Geographical Information System…………………………………….59 Appendix B. Universal Soil Loss Equation………………………………………….67 Appendix C. Tabular data for soils and monitoring plot information……………….95 Appendix D. Plot data………………………………………………………………104 References………………………………………………………………………..…303 viii List of Tables Table 1: Calculations used to determine percent canopy………..………………….38 Table 2: Boyle Soil Series one-way ANOVA output……………………………….42 Table 3: Bronell Soil Series one-way ANOVA output……………………………...43 Table 4: Bundo Soil Series one-way ANOVA output……………………………….43 Table 5: Libeg Soil Series one-way ANOVA output………………………………..44 Table 6: Pendant Soil Series one-way ANOVA output……………………………...44 Table 7: Raleigh Soil Series one-way ANOVA output……………………………...45 Table 8: Resort Soil Series one-way ANOVA output……………………………….45 Table 9: Rogert Soil Series one-way ANOVA output……………………………….46 Table 10: Tolex Soil Series one-way ANOVA output……………………………....46 Table 11: Summary table of a one- way ANOVA analysis of statistical significant differences between soil series……………………………..…….47 Table 12: Plot information that lacks sufficient data for statistical analysis………..48 Table 13: Pre Treatment Comparison one-way ANOVA output…………………….49 Table 14: Post One-Year Comparison one-way ANOVA output…………………....49 Table 15: Post Two-Year Comparison one-way ANOVA output…………………...50 Table 16: Summary table of a one- way ANOVA analysis of statistical significant differences between treatment types and status of treatment…….51 ix List of Figures Figure 1: Map depicting the location of Fremont County and Canon City, Colorado……………………………………………………………………….6 Figure 2: Map demonstrating the area that the Royal Gorge Resource Area manages in relation to Colorado……………………..……………….……….7 Figure 3: Map depicting the land status of Fremont County…………………………8 Figure 4: Schematic and photograph demonstrating the chaining technique………...9 Figure 5. Rollerchop at North Cotopaxi project. Photo by A. Merriam October 2002…………………………………………………………………………..20 Figure 6: Rills caused by Roller Chopper, North Cotopaxi project. BLM, November 2002……………………………………………………..………..21 Figure 7: Photo illustrating the influx of exotic species, North Cotopaxi project. Photo by A. Merriam, June 2004…………………………………………….21 Figure 8: Rollerchop project before treatment. BLM, July 2002…………………...22 Figure 9: Rollerchop project one year after treatment. A. Merriam, July 2003……..22 Figure 10: Rollerchop project two years after treatment. A. Merriam, June 2004….22 Figure 11. The mower type head of a Hydroaxe. BLM, North Cotopaxi, October 2002………………………………………………………………………….24 Figure 12. A Hydroaxe removing selected trees. BLM, North Cotopaxi October 2002…………………………………………………………….…………….24 Figure 13: Hydroaxe project before treatment. BLM, July 2002…………………..25 Figure 14: Hydroaxe project one-year post treatment. BLM, July 2003…………….25 x Figure 15: Hydroaxe project two years post treatment. A. Merriam June 2004…….25 Figure 16: Hand thinning with a chainsaw. BLM, Poverty Mountain September 2002…………………………………………………………………………..26 Figure 17: Hand Thinning and Pile Burning project. BLM, August 2002………….27
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Park County, Colorado World War II 4Th Draft Registration "Old Man"
    Park County, Colorado World War II 4th Draft Registration "Old Man" This Registration was the 4th of 6 draft registrations conducted by the Selective Service System which commenced on April 27, 1942 and was terminated on March 31, 1947 by an act of Congress. The purpose of the registration was to collect information on industrial capacity and skills of men aged 45 to 64 who were born on April 18, 1877 through and including February 16, 1897 and who were not already in the military that could be utilized for national service if needed. A description including race, height, weight, complexion and obvious physical characteristics are included on the back of the card. Papers/cards attached to a few cards may give more information about the individuals' military history, decorations, citations, change of address or death. Copies of both sides of the card may be obtained by writing the National Archives & Records Administration, National Archives - St Louis, PO Box 38757, St. Louis, MO 63138-0757. The cost is $7.00. The information needed to obtain a copy of the card is the person's full name, city and county of registration, and date of birth. This compilation is for Park County, Colorado. Men who lived in Park County at the time of registration and those who were listed as born in Park County are included in this collection. Please see our other 3 counties for their respective areas. Name of Registrant Age Date of Birth Place of Birth City and/or County Registered In Colorado Ackley, Harley J. 50 22 Sep 1891 Sand Priarie, Wisconsin Fairplay, Park Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Agriculture
    A Look at Colorado Agriculture Climate & Soil Capital: Denver • Colorado’s climate is generally dry and sunny. It is a semi-arid state averaging 15” of precipitation. • Colorado has dry winters, wetter springs and summer, highly changeable weather, often windy Population: 5,607,154 and the occasional monstrous thunderstorms with damaging hail. Founded: August 1, 1876 (38th) • Because of the difference in altitude found in the state there is a large range of temperatures. • The soils in the eastern plains regions and the valley of the western mountains are the most fertile State Bird: Lark bunting in the nation. State Tree: Blue Spruce • Colorado’s State soil is “Seitz soil” that consists of very deep, well drained, slowly permeable soils that were formed from igneous, sedimentary and volcanic rocks. Seitz soils are found on State Flower: Rocky Mountain mountains, mainly in southwestern and central Colorado. • Colorado’s warm days and cool nights help lock in sweetness in fruits such as peaches and Columbine melons. Number of Counties: 64 Crops & Livestock Largest City: Denver - 693,060 • Colorado ranks first nationally in production of proso millet. This annual grass is grown as a grain crop and is used for bird and livestock feed. Nickname: The Centennial State • Colorado’s production of sunflowers ranks fourth in the nation. Number of Farms: 33,800 • The San Luis Valley is the largest and highest alpine valley in the world capable of producing crops. Elevation in the valley ranges from 7,400 to 8,000 feet. Average Farm Size: 938 acres • Colorado produces more than 100 million points of pinto beach each year, ranking ninth nationally Total Farmland: 31.7 million acres in dry bean production.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Municipalities Vol
    Colorado Municipalities Vol. 97, No. 1, January 2021 CML'S POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND 2021 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES Going into each legislative session, CML begins its policy development process, which guides our legislative priorities. A DAY IN THE LIFE OF CML'S ADVOCACY TEAM CML's Advocacy Team represents municipal interests to the Colorado General Assembly. Check out what a typical day in the life looks like. LEGISLATIVE EDITION Building Communities. It’s what we do. James Mann Melissa Buck Sherry Villafane Ryan Miles Stephen Broden Senior Municipal Municipal Advisor Municipal Advisor Senior Investment Managing Director, Advisor/Principal Advisor Arbitrage Metropolitan District Advisory • Financial Management Planning Debt Issuance & Management • Investments & Arbitrage Consulting [email protected] ehlers-inc.com (800) 552-1171 The information provided in these materials does not create or imply a fiduciary relationship. It is solely for the purposes of marketing our services to you. Ehlers is the jointmarketing name for all its affliated businesses. Please visit www.ehlers-inc.com/disclosures for more information. CEBT | Partnering with CML CEBT CEBTPartnering has been providing with employee CML benefits through a nonprofit trust to public entities for CEBT has been providingover 30 employeeyears benefits through a nonprofit trust to public entities for 40 years Employee Benefit Solutions Medical - Dental - Vision - Life Jim Hermann | Willis Towers Watson (303) 803-9105 | (800) 332-1168 [email protected] www.cebt.org Comprehensive HR solutions for advanced organizational performance. HR ON DEMAND We offer On-Demand HR Services Human Resources support for your organization doesn’t need to break the budget. We offer scalable solutions so that you can pay for what you need.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2020 (PDF)
    SUMMER 2020 COLORADO FAMILY PHYSICIAN RESOURCES AND GUIDANCE FOR REOPENING MEDICAL PRACTICES PG…15 CONSIDERATIONS FOR RETURN TO YOUTH SPORTS AMIDST COVID-19 PANDEMIC PG…16 ANNUAL REPORT 2019 PG…19 YOU ARE THE KEY TO ZERO SUICIDE of those who complete suicide see a primary care physician in the 30 days before they die. The Journal of General Internal Medicine ‘Health Care Contacts in the Year before Suicide Death’ (June 2014 Vol 29 Issue 6 pp870-877) notes that nearly all completed suicides receive health care in year prior to death (83%), yet less than 25% had a mental health diagnosis in the month prior to death. The new West Springs Hospital is a resource for you and your patients. Our psychiatric staff is happy to consult regarding identification of mental illness and suicidal ideation. Should your patient need our services, we provide a world-class, state-of-the-art healing environment set amongst the majestic vistas of Western Colorado. ConsultationsandWalkinCrisisServicesAvailable /ExpeditedAssessment&Admissions WSH﹒ Francis Lotrich, MD, PhD Kim Boe, ACHE, MM, HRM Shona Vocke-Page, RN Medical Director Executive Vice President Director of Nursing NA&/R﹐GJ﹐C CAFP CHAIR/PAST PRESIDENT ZACH WACHTL, MD SECRETARY/ ALAN-MICHAEL VARGAS, MD DENVER TREASURER PARACHUTE [email protected] [email protected] Board of PRESIDENT JOHN CAWLEY, MD MEMBER-AT-LARGE STEPHANIE GOLD, MD FT. COLLINS DENVER [email protected] [email protected] Directors PRESIDENT-ELECT GINA CARR, MD EXTERNAL RELATIONS/ MONICA MORRIS, DO LAKE CITY AWARDS COMM.CHAIR DENVER [email protected] [email protected] Officers VICE PRESIDENT CRAIG ANTHONY, MD DENVER [email protected] 2019-2020 Board Members Resident Representatives Student Representatives Vision Statement: Term Expiring 2020 Emily Aquila, DO, 2021, St.
    [Show full text]
  • If .ASSIFIED LEGAL NOTICE This Report Was Prepared As an Account of Government Sponsored Work
    UNCLASSIFIED [£640* GEOLOGY AND MINEMfiLOGY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS OF RADIOACTIVE DEPOSITS Semiannual Progress Report for June 1 to November 30, 1956 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U. S. Geological Survey standards and nomenclature. December 1956 Geological Survey Washington, D. C. Prepared by Geological Survey for the UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Technical Information Service Extension, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 40455 [If .ASSIFIED LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of Government sponsored work. Neither the United States, nor the Commission, nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission: A. Makes any warranty or representation, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the'use of any information, apparatus, method-, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report. As used in the above, "person acting on behalf of the Commission" includes any em­ ployee or contractor of the Commission to the extent that such employee or contractor prepares, handles or distributes, or provides access to, any information pursuant to his employment or contract with the Commission. I This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Printed in USA, Price $1.50. Available from the Office of Technical Services, Department of Commerce, Washington 25, D. C. AEC, Oak Ridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado
    BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF CHANGES TO THE ) CAUSE NO. 1R RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE OIL AND ) DOCKET NO. 200300071 GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF ) TYPE: RULEMAKING THE STATE OF COLORADO ) PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIERS’ 300-SERIES JOINT RESPONSE STATEMENT Arapahoe County Water and Wastewater Authority (“ACWWA”), Aurora Water, City of Brighton, City of Commerce City, East Cherry Creek Valley Water and Sanitation District (“ECCV”), Greatrock North Water and Sanitation District (“Greatrock North”), South Adams County Water and Sanitation District (“South Adams”), South Beebe Draw Metropolitan District, South Metro Water Supply Authority, Town of Castle Rock (“Castle Rock”), Town of Lochbuie (“Lochbuie”), and United Water and Sanitation District (“United”) (collectively, “Public Water Suppliers”), by and through their undersigned attorneys and representatives, respectfully submit this 300-Series Joint Response Statement in the above-captioned rulemaking in accordance with the Second Amended Case Management Order. For the reasons described in the Public Water Suppliers’ 300-Series Joint Prehearing Statement, notice and consultation for potentially impacted Public Water Systems is critically important. I. EXHIBITS AND WITNESSES Pursuant to the Second Amended Case Management Order, the Public Water Suppliers attach the following exhibits: ñ Exhibit 1 – Resume of Christopher Sanchez. ñ Exhibit 2 – Resume of Heather Justus. ñ Exhibit 3 – Resume of Matthew Seitz. Public Water Suppliers’ 300-Series Joint Response Statement Page 2 ñ Exhibit 4 – Resume of Scott Mefford. The Public Water Suppliers identify the following witnesses and their testimony: ñ Christopher Sanchez, P.G., BBA Water Consultants, Inc., for Lochbuie and Greatrock North.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado State Soil
    Seitz Colorado State Soil Soil Science Society of America Introduction Many states have a designated state bird, flower, fish, tree, rock, etc. And, many states also have a state soil – one that has significance or is important to the state. The Seitz is the of- ficial state soil ofColorado . Let’s explore how the Seitz is important to the state of Colorado! History In 1972, Seitz soils were first established in the area around Rio Grande County, Colorado. The soil got its name from the Seitz stream which was close to where soil scientists described the soil. The Seitz soil is the foundation for the grand and scenic views associated with Colo- rado and the large variety of outdoor recreational opportunities the state has to offer. What is Seitz Soil? The Seitz soils located primarily in southwestern Colorado are predominantly found at higher cooler elevations. These soils are found on hills, ridges, high valleys, and mountain slopes. Seitz soils are used as pastureland for grazing cattle, forestry, and outdoor recreation like hik- ing, camping, and winter sports because they are found in the mountainous areas of Colorado. Seitz soils are very deep, well drained soils developed in colluvium and slope alluvium. This means that as the rock on the mountainsides weather, the weathered material begins to creep and fall downslope due to gravity and water. As these materials reach a more stable position in the landscape, they accumulate and, over time, further weathering occurs, creating the Seitz soil. They are found on hills, ridges, mountain slopes, and valley sides, on slopes ranging from 2 to 65 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Win, Baby”: the Tenth Circuit Rejects the “Anything Goes” Tactics of the Hail-Litigation Gold Rush
    “JUST WIN, BABY”: THE TENTH CIRCUIT REJECTS THE “ANYTHING GOES” TACTICS OF THE HAIL-LITIGATION GOLD RUSH † †† EVAN STEPHENSON & KAYLA SCROGGINS-UPTIGROVE ABSTRACT In Colorado, the federal courts are experiencing a legal gold rush arising from hail and other storm damage insurance lawsuits. Entrepre- neurial plaintiffs’ lawyers, public adjusters, insurance appraisers, and others have developed aggressive techniques for maximizing the value of hail-damage claims. These tactics drew a sharp rebuke from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in two published opinions, both in appeals captioned Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Summit Park Town- home Ass’n (Summit Park). The court affirmed an order that vacated a $10,870,090.96 hail-damage appraisal award, sanctioned the policyhold- er’s attorneys for misconduct, entered a default judgment against the policyholder as a sanction, and required the policyholder’s lawyers to pay the insurance company’s attorney fees. Summit Park rejects various claim practices of wide import that have taken root in other jurisdictions. These practices frequently arise in the context of insurance apprais- al, a relatively informal method of alternative dispute resolution that in most cases depends on the parties to an insurance valuation dispute each appointing an impartial appraiser to determine the amount of the property loss. The policyholder in Summit Park obtained an approximate $10 mil- lion appraisal award by appointing a partisan appraiser with whom its law firm had undisclosed and extensive fiduciary, personal, and financial connections. The appraiser had initially entered into an undisclosed en- gagement agreement giving him an interest in the outcome of the ap- praisal.
    [Show full text]
  • CGWA Harlan Erker Scholarship Recipient Submission, Page 6
    Rigging Down Near Vail Feature Article: CGWA Harlan Erker Scholarship Recipient Submission, page 6 CGWA Upcoming Events December CGWA Luncheon “Coalbed Methane and Groundwater— Table of Contents Competing Resources?” Where: Leonard Rice Engineers, 2000 CGWA Upcoming Events .... 1 Clay Street, Denver When: Wednesday, December 17, noon President’s Letter................. 2 Featured Speaker: Ralf Topper, Colorado Geological Survey Coalbed Methane ................. 4 Election Results ................... 5 Save the Date “A New Look at The Denver Feature Article...................... 6 Basin” Lecture 1: Celebrating the Denver Summary of TWG................. 9 Basin Cores Where: Federal Center Core Lab, Lakewood Upcoming Events................. 9 When: Friday, January 30, 2009 (all day) The Denver Basin Featured Speakers: CGWA Membership............ 10 George Van Slyke, Bob Raynolds, Jim Jehn , Peter Barkmann CWWCA Annual Conf. ....... 12 Inside This Issue We are currently in the middle of Board Members President’s our 2008 – 2009 Membership Drive. Last year we had 85 registered President: Heather Justus - [email protected], Leo- nard Rice Engineers, Inc. members; we are planning to in- Vice President: Matt Seitz - [email protected], Letter by crease this number by continuing HRS Water Consultants, Inc. to offer useful and interesting pres- Secretary: Matt Rhoades - Heather Justus entations, networking opportunities, [email protected] and services to our members and Treasurer: Hoyt Sutphin - [email protected], CH2M Hill the community. Your membership ear Fellow Directors: Andy Horn - [email protected], CDM dues are used for various programs Ground Water Gina Burke - [email protected], Jehn D and activities sponsored by CGWA Water Enthusiasts , including publishing the newsletter, Past President: Ralf Topper - [email protected], maintaining the web page, hosting Colorado Geological Survey This edition of the lunch speaker presentations, the newsletter and awarding an annual scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of the Ecoregions of Colorado 1 8
    Summary Table: Characteristics of the Ecoregions of Colorado 1 8 . WYOMING BASIN 2 2 . ARIZONA/NEW MEXICO PLATEAU Level IV Ecoregions Physiography Geology Soils Climate Natural Vegetation Land Use and Land Cover Level IV Ecoregions Physiography Geology Soils Climate Natural Vegetation Land Use and Land Cover Area Elevation/ Surfi cial and Bedrock Order (Great Group) Common Soil Series Temperature/ Precipitation Frost Free Mean Temperature Area Elevation/ Surfi cial and Bedrock Order (Great Group) Common Soil Series Temperature/ Precipitation Frost Free Mean Temperature (square Local Relief Moisture Regimes Mean annual Mean annual January min/max; (square Local Relief Moisture Regimes Mean annual Mean annual January min/max; miles) (feet) (inches) (days) July min/max (oF) miles) (feet) (inches) (days) July min/max (oF) 18a. Rolling 2197 Rolling plains with hills, cuestas, 5200-7500/ Quaternary alluvium, colluvium, outwash, Aridisols (Haplargids, Ryan Park, Maybell, Frigid/ Mostly 60-90 4/32; Sagebrush steppe with areas of bitterbrush Shrub-covered rangeland, with some 22a. San Luis 993 Low mountains, hills, mesas, and 7900-9100/ Quaternary gravels and alluvium. Tertiary Aridisols (Haplocalcids, Travelers, Garita, Luhon, Frigid/ 10-14 30-60 4/32; Shrublands, grasslands, and pinyon-juniper Shrub- and grass-covered rangeland. Sagebrush mesas, terraces, and near the footslopes, 100-400 thin residuum, and eolian deposits. Tertiary Calciargids), Entisols Rockriver, Mayspring, Ryark, Aridic, Ustic 10-15, 48/88 shrubland and scattered juniper woodland areas of cropland, especially along Shrublands and foothills. 400-1000 igneous rocks of basalt fl ows, pre-ash Calciargids), Mollisols Space City, Costilla, Tolman, Aridic, Ustic 42/76 woodlands at highest elevations. Species Low density grazing, wildlife Steppe alluvial fans, and outwash fans.
    [Show full text]
  • Final EA CSFS Fuels Mitigation Project
    Programmatic Environmental Assessment Post-Disaster Road, Bridge and Trail Replacement, Relocation and Upgrade in the State of Colorado May 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Department of Homeland Security Region VIII Denver Federal Center Building 710, Box 25267 Denver, CO 80225-0267 Federal Highway Administration Colorado Division and Central Federal Lands Highway Division 12300 W. Dakota Ave. Lakewood, CO 80228 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................iii Section One Introduction ........................................................................................ ……..4 1.1 Overview…………………………………………………………………………….4 1.2 Background .......................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Process………………………………………………………………………………………..5 1.4 Purpose and Need…………………………………………………………………...6 Section Two Alternatives…………………………………………………………………....7 2.1 Alternatives Not Retained…………………………………………………………..7 2.2 Alternatives Considered………………………………………………………….7 2.2.1 Alternative 1 – No Action …………………………………………..8 2.2.2 Alternative 2 – Replacement………………………….……………..8 2.2.3 Alternative 3 – Relocation………….………………………………..9 2.2.4 Alternative 4 –New Structure Design……………………………….9 2.2.6 Alternative 5 – Alternate Route)…………………………………...10 Section Three Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ………….………11 3.1 Physical Resources ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Local Elected Officials Re: Rulemakings
    To: Air Quality Control Commission From: Colorado Local Elected Officials Re: Rulemakings Date: June 18, 2020 Dear Air Quality Control Commissioners and Staff, As elected officials representing residents from across the entire state of Colorado, we write in support of the work being done by the Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC) and to encourage the Commission to continue its rulemaking efforts to develop real, meaningful regulations that protect all Coloradans, the air we breathe, and the environment in which we live and recreate. We understand that there are two overlapping and related external factors impacting the work of the Commission and staff: the Covid-19 pandemic and the collapse of the global oil and gas futures market. However, we ask that as the rulemaking process moves forward, the voices of all Coloradans across the state continue to be heard. Our primary concern is the perception of a divide between the needs of rural and urban communities across the state. Every Coloradan deserves to be able to breathe clean air, drink clean water as well as live, work, and recreate in a safe, healthy environment. SB19-181 expressly grants local governments the power to regulate oil and gas activity above and beyond the level of the state government. Contrary to arguments made elsewhere, this is an expansion of our authority as local elected officials, not a limitation. Local protections paired with robust statewide rules from the AQCC will allow each and every local government in the state to adapt to the unique circumstances of our jurisdictions and truly protect our residents.
    [Show full text]