Problems Surrounding Health Care Service Utilization for Mixtec
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Declining Use of Mixtec Among Oaxacan Migrants and Stay-At
UC San Diego Working Papers Title The Declining Use of the Mixtec Language Among Oaxacan Migrants and Stay-at-Homes: The Persistence of Memory, Discrimination, and Social Hierarchies of PowerThe Declining Use of the Mixtec Language Among Oaxacan Migrants and Stay-at-Homes: The Persis... Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/64p447tc Author Perry, Elizabeth Publication Date 2017-10-18 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Perry The Declining Use of the Mixtec Language 1 The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies CCIS University of California, San Diego The Declining Use of the Mixtec Language Among Oaxacan Migrants and Stay-at-Homes: The Persistence of Memory, Discrimination, and Social Hierarchies of Power Elizabeth Perry University of California, San Diego Working Paper 180 July 2009 Perry The Declining Use of the Mixtec Language 2 Abstract Drawing on binational ethnographic research regarding Mixtec “social memory” of language discrimination and Mixtec perspectives on recent efforts to preserve and revitalize indigenous language use, this study suggests that language discrimination, in both its overt and increasingly concealed forms, has significantly curtailed the use of the Mixtec language. For centuries, the Spanish and Spanish-speaking mestizo (mixed blood) elite oppressed the Mixtec People and their linguistic and cultural practices. These oppressive practices were experienced in Mixtec communities and surrounding urban areas, as well as in domestic and international migrant destinations. In the 1980s, a significant transition occurred in Mexico from indigenismo to a neoliberal multicultural framework. In this transition, discriminatory practices have become increasingly “symbolic,” referring to their assertion in everyday social practices rather than through overt force, obscuring both the perpetrator and the illegitimacy of resulting social hierarchies (Bourdieu, 1991). -
Ancient Mexico: the Legacy of the Plumed Serpent
LACMA | Evenings for Educators | April 17, 2012 Ancient Mexico: The Legacy of the Plumed Serpent _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ The greatness of Mexico is that its past is always alive . Mexico exists in the present, its dawn is occurring right now, because it carries with it the wealth 1 of a living past, an unburied memory. —Carlos Fuentes MUCH OF THE HISTORY AND TRADITIONS OF MESOAMERICA, The system of pictographic communication a cultural region encompassing most of Mexico and and its accompanying shared art style was an northern Central America, can be traced through ingenious response to the needs of communities a pictorial language, or writing system, that was whose leaders spoke as many as twelve different introduced around AD 950. By 1300 it had been languages. Beginning in the tenth century, widely adopted throughout Southern Mexico. Southern Mexico was dominated by a confeder- This shared art style and writing system was used acy of city-states (autonomous states consisting to record and preserve the history, genealogy, and of a city and surrounding territories). Largely mythology of the region. It documents systems controlled by the nobility of the Nahua, Mixtec, of trade and migration, royal marriage, wars, and and Zapotec peoples, these city-states claimed records epic stories that continue to be passed on a common heritage. They believed that their through a pictorial and oral tradition today. kingdoms had been founded by the hero Quetzalcoatl, the human incarnation of the This pictorial language was composed of highly Plumed Serpent. They shared a culture, world- conventionalized symbols characterized by an view, and some religious practices but operated almost geometric precision of line. -
Zapotec Empire an Empire Covering 20 000 Sq
1 Zapotec Empire an empire covering 20 000 sq. km. This empire is thought to have included the Cen- ARTHUR A. JOYCE tral Valleys (i.e., the Valleys of Oaxaca, Ejutla, University of Colorado, USA and Miahuatlán) and surrounding areas such as the Cañada de Cuicatlán as well as regions to the east and south extending to the Pacific Archaeological and ethnohistoric evidence coastal lowlands, particularly the lower Río from Oaxaca, Mexico, suggests that Zapo- Verde Valley. These researchers argue that tec-speaking peoples may have formed small Monte Albán’s rulers pursued a strategy of empires during the pre-Hispanic era (Joyce territorial conquest and imperial control 2010). A possible empire was centered on through the use of a large, well-trained, and the Late Formative period (300 BCE–200 CE) hierarchical military that pursued extended city of Monte Albán in the Oaxaca Valley. campaigns and established hilltop outposts, The existence of this empire, however, has garrisons, and fortifications (Redmond and been the focus of a major debate. Stronger Spencer 2006: 383). Evidence that Monte support is available for a coastal Zapotec Albán conquered and directly administered Empire centered on the Late Postclassic outlying regions, however, is largely limited – (1200 1522 CE) city of Tehuantepec. to iconographic interpretations of a series of Debate concerning Late Formative Zapotec carved stones at Monte Albán known as the imperialism is focused on Monte Albán and “Conquest Slabs” and debatable similarities its interactions with surrounding regions. in ceramic styles among these regions (e.g., Monte Albán was founded in c.500 BCE on Marcus and Flannery 1996). -
Recovering After Childbirth in the Mixtec Highlands (Mexico)
M~DICAMENTSET ALIMENTS :L'APPROCHE ETHNOPHARMACOLOGIQLJE I 99 Recovering after childbirth in the Mixtec highlands (Mexico) KATZ Esther ORSTOM (Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pourle Développement en Coopération) Département MAA (Milieu et Activités Agricoles) 213, rue Lafayette- 75480 PARIS Cedex 10 - FRANCE Fa: 33-1-40351713 RÉSUMÉ Les Indiens du haut pays mixtèque, tout comme d'autres Indiens du Mexique, prennent particulièrement soin des jeunes accouchées. Un certain nombre de travaux portent sur la grossesse et l'accouchement au Mexique, mais le thème du post- partum a été peu étudié en profondeur, bien que les indigknes insistent sur le danger et l'importance des soins à cette période. Dans ce travail, la conception, la grossesse et l'accouchement sont décrits à titre introductif, tandis que les pratiques du post- partum sont analysées en détail : la période de repos de 20 ou 40 jours, le régime alimentaire particulier, l'abstinence sexuelle, les diverses précautions et prohibitions, les soins corporels, les tisanes, les bains de plantes et surtout, le bain de vapeur, à fonction à la fois thérapeutique et rituelle. L'article posele problème de l'analyse des données touchant aux pratiques corpo- relles féminines, difficilement verbalisées. Il amorce également une comparaison avec les pratiques des pays industrialisés occidentaux et suggère de puiser dans les pratiques et les connaissances des sociétés dites << traditionnelles >> pour remédier aux dépressions post-partum. INTRODUCTION 1973;ALVAREZ JEYLlENREICH, 1976; COMINSKY, 1976 1982; QUEZADA 1977;RITA, 1979;L6PEZAUSTIN, Like most of the indigenous peoples of Mexico, the Mixtec AND 1980; GARCfARUIZANDPETRICH, 1983; IRETON, 1987; Indians view pregnancyas a disease. -
Knowledge of Skull Base Anatomy and Surgical Implications of Human Sacrifice Among Pre-Columbian Mesoamerican Cultures
See the corresponding retraction, DOI: 10.3171/2018.5.FOCUS12120r, for full details. Neurosurg Focus 33 (2):E1, 2012 Knowledge of skull base anatomy and surgical implications of human sacrifice among pre-Columbian Mesoamerican cultures RAUL LOPEZ-SERNA, M.D.,1 JUAN LUIS GOMEZ-AMADOR, M.D.,1 JUAN BArgES-COLL, M.D.,1 NICASIO ArrIADA-MENDICOA, M.D.,1 SAMUEL ROMERO-VArgAS, M.D., M.SC.,2 MIGUEL RAMOS-PEEK, M.D.,1 MIGUEL ANGEL CELIS-LOPEZ, M.D.,1 ROGELIO REVUELTA-GUTIErrEZ, M.D.,1 AND LESLY PORTOCArrERO-ORTIZ, M.D., M.SC.3 1Department of Neurosurgery, Instituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirugia “Manuel Velasco Suárez;” 2Department of Spine Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación; and 3Department of Neuroendocrinology, Instituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirugia “Manuel Velasco Suárez,” Mexico City, Mexico Human sacrifice became a common cultural trait during the advanced phases of Mesoamerican civilizations. This phenomenon, influenced by complex religious beliefs, included several practices such as decapitation, cranial deformation, and the use of human cranial bones for skull mask manufacturing. Archaeological evidence suggests that all of these practices required specialized knowledge of skull base and upper cervical anatomy. The authors con- ducted a systematic search for information on skull base anatomical and surgical knowledge among Mesoamerican civilizations. A detailed exposition of these results is presented, along with some interesting information extracted from historical documents and pictorial codices to provide a better understanding of skull base surgical practices among these cultures. Paleoforensic evidence from the Great Temple of Tenochtitlan indicates that Aztec priests used a specialized decapitation technique, based on a deep anatomical knowledge. -
Encounter with the Plumed Serpent
Maarten Jansen and Gabina Aurora Pérez Jiménez ENCOUNTENCOUNTEERR withwith thethe Drama and Power in the Heart of Mesoamerica Preface Encounter WITH THE plumed serpent i Mesoamerican Worlds From the Olmecs to the Danzantes GENERAL EDITORS: DAVÍD CARRASCO AND EDUARDO MATOS MOCTEZUMA The Apotheosis of Janaab’ Pakal: Science, History, and Religion at Classic Maya Palenque, GERARDO ALDANA Commoner Ritual and Ideology in Ancient Mesoamerica, NANCY GONLIN AND JON C. LOHSE, EDITORS Eating Landscape: Aztec and European Occupation of Tlalocan, PHILIP P. ARNOLD Empires of Time: Calendars, Clocks, and Cultures, Revised Edition, ANTHONY AVENI Encounter with the Plumed Serpent: Drama and Power in the Heart of Mesoamerica, MAARTEN JANSEN AND GABINA AURORA PÉREZ JIMÉNEZ In the Realm of Nachan Kan: Postclassic Maya Archaeology at Laguna de On, Belize, MARILYN A. MASSON Life and Death in the Templo Mayor, EDUARDO MATOS MOCTEZUMA The Madrid Codex: New Approaches to Understanding an Ancient Maya Manuscript, GABRIELLE VAIL AND ANTHONY AVENI, EDITORS Mesoamerican Ritual Economy: Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, E. CHRISTIAN WELLS AND KARLA L. DAVIS-SALAZAR, EDITORS Mesoamerica’s Classic Heritage: Teotihuacan to the Aztecs, DAVÍD CARRASCO, LINDSAY JONES, AND SCOTT SESSIONS Mockeries and Metamorphoses of an Aztec God: Tezcatlipoca, “Lord of the Smoking Mirror,” GUILHEM OLIVIER, TRANSLATED BY MICHEL BESSON Rabinal Achi: A Fifteenth-Century Maya Dynastic Drama, ALAIN BRETON, EDITOR; TRANSLATED BY TERESA LAVENDER FAGAN AND ROBERT SCHNEIDER Representing Aztec Ritual: Performance, Text, and Image in the Work of Sahagún, ELOISE QUIÑONES KEBER, EDITOR The Social Experience of Childhood in Mesoamerica, TRACI ARDREN AND SCOTT R. HUTSON, EDITORS Stone Houses and Earth Lords: Maya Religion in the Cave Context, KEITH M. -
The Catholic Church, Indigenous Theology and Cultural Autonomy in Oaxaca, Mexico
DECOLONIZATION AND THE POLITICS OF SYNCRETISM: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, INDIGENOUS THEOLOGY AND CULTURAL AUTONOMY IN OAXACA, MEXICO Kristin Norget Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada INTRODUCTION My first experience was with the Icots brothers, in a culture different from our own Zapotec culture—it was with the Huaves, close to the sea. I was there with other priest friends a year and a half. All of us together had an initiation experience that told us that this is definitely the right path. That is, I learned also to follow a slower rhythm, not to reject all the knowledge that the Huaves have, and to ground myself in existence in the daily contact with the people. I learned with them the work of fishing, because they’re fisher- men....It’s a hard life, with a lot of suffering...that of living day-to-day, with only what’s necessary for that day. And I learned that you can’t say, ‘Let’s come together to pray’—instead you have to go to where they are, so that also our language and what we want to share can be understood. And for me it was a real wake up. -GM, Catholic priest and Zapotec from Juchitán, Oaxaca, 1995 (Interview with GM, Tehuantepec Diocesis, October 1995) These words of a Zapotec indigenous priest working in the southern Mexican state of Oaxaca encapsulate the defining ethos of a pastoral pro- gram guided by the philosophy of “indigenous theology” (teología indíge- na), a praxis advocating the concerted syncretism of Roman Catholicism and indigenous religions. -
The Health of Migrant Oaxacan Farm Workers in California Ornelas 1
The Health of Migrant Oaxacan Farm Workers in California Ornelas 1 Introduction The Oaxacan Farm-Working Community in California In the United States, 68 of the 72% foreign born farmworkers originate from Mexico. Of this According to a study conducted by the California percentage, 20% are from the southern states of Farm Labor Force, 38% of the new farmworker Mexico, including Oaxaca.1 labor force in 2005 included indigenous Mexicans, making them the fastest growing farm labor group in When first migrating to the United States, these California5. An estimated 100,000 to 150,000 farmworkers are “astonishingly healthy….despite indigenous Oaxacans live in California6, while a being poorer, less educated, and medically total of 1 million Oaxacans are estimated to live in underserved.”2 However, with increased time in the the United States7. United States, and with generation after generation, their health status as a group decreases.2 The indigenous Oaxacan community is not homogeneous. In Oaxaca, there are 17 distinct Current research shows that Mexican farmworkers, indigenous languages and cultures. In California, the as compared to the general population, have high top three communities are the Mixtec, Trique, and rates of obesity, hypertension, elevated cholesterol, Zapotec people, who speak Mixteco, Triqui, and and have limited access to health care due to lack of Zapoteco respectively. The Zapotec people are health insurance or legal status. Compounded with mostly concentrated in cities such as Los Angeles. their dangerous occupation, Mexican farmworkers The Mixtec people are mostly concentrated in the are at increased risk for cardiovascular diseases, Central Valley, and the Trique people are mostly diabetes, musculoskeletal injuries, upper respiratory concentrated in the Central Valley and Northern diseases, and other life-threatening conditions3. -
Language EI Country Genetic Unit Speakers RI Acatepec Tlapanec 5
Language EI Country Genetic Unit Speakers RI Acatepec Tlapanec 5 Mexico Subtiapa-Tlapanec 33000 1 Alacatlatzala Mixtec 4.5 Mexico Mixtecan 23000 2 Alcozauca Mixtec 5 Mexico Mixtecan 10000 3 Aloápam Zapotec 4 Mexico Zapotecan 2100 4 Amatlán Zapotec 5 Mexico Zapotecan 6000 5 Amoltepec Mixtec 3 Mexico Mixtecan 6000 6 Ascunción Mixtepec Zapotec 1 Mexico Zapotecan 100 7 Atatláhuca Mixtec 5 Mexico Mixtecan 8300 8 Ayautla Mazatec 5 Mexico Popolocan 3500 9 Ayoquesco Zapotec 3 Mexico Zapotecan < 900 10 Ayutla Mixtec 5 Mexico Mixtecan 8500 11 Azoyú Tlapanec 1 Mexico Subtiapa-Tlapanec < 680 12 Aztingo Matlatzinca 1 Mexico Otopamean > < 100 13 Matlatzincan Cacaloxtepec Mixtec 2.5 Mexico Mixtecan < 850 14 Cajonos Zapotec 4 Mexico Zapotecan 5000 15 Central Hausteca Nahuatl 5 Mexico Uto-Aztecan 200000 16 Central Nahuatl 3 Mexico Uto-Aztecan 40000 17 Central Pame 4 Mexico Pamean 4350 18 Central Puebla Nahuatl 4.5 Mexico Uto-Aztecan 16000 19 Chaopan Zapotec 5 Mexico Zapotecan 24000 20 Chayuco Mixtec 5 Mexico Mixtecan 30000 21 Chazumba Mixtec 2 Mexico Mixtecan < 2,500 22 Chiapanec 1 Mexico Chiapanec-Mangue < 20 23 Chicahuaxtla Triqui 5 Mexico Mixtecan 6000 24 Chichicapan Zapotec 4 Mexico Zapotecan 4000 25 Chichimeca-Jonaz 3 Mexico Otopamean > < 200 26 Chichimec Chigmecatitlan Mixtec 3 Mexico Mixtecan 1600 27 Chiltepec Chinantec 3 Mexico Chinantecan < 1,000 28 Chimalapa Zoque 3.5 Mexico Zoque 4500 29 Chiquihuitlán Mazatec 3.5 Mexico Popolocan 2500 30 Chochotec 3 Mexico Popolocan 770 31 Coatecas Altas Zapotec 4 Mexico Zapotecan 5000 32 Coatepec Nahuatl 2.5 -
The Declining Use of the Mixtec Language Among Oaxacan Migrants and Stay-At-Homes: the Persistence of Memory, Discrimination, and Social Hierarchies of Power
Perry The Declining Use of the Mixtec Language 1 The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies CCIS University of California, San Diego The Declining Use of the Mixtec Language Among Oaxacan Migrants and Stay-at-Homes: The Persistence of Memory, Discrimination, and Social Hierarchies of Power Elizabeth Perry University of California, San Diego Working Paper 180 July 2009 Perry The Declining Use of the Mixtec Language 2 Abstract Drawing on binational ethnographic research regarding Mixtec “social memory” of language discrimination and Mixtec perspectives on recent efforts to preserve and revitalize indigenous language use, this study suggests that language discrimination, in both its overt and increasingly concealed forms, has significantly curtailed the use of the Mixtec language. For centuries, the Spanish and Spanish-speaking mestizo (mixed blood) elite oppressed the Mixtec People and their linguistic and cultural practices. These oppressive practices were experienced in Mixtec communities and surrounding urban areas, as well as in domestic and international migrant destinations. In the 1980s, a significant transition occurred in Mexico from indigenismo to a neoliberal multicultural framework. In this transition, discriminatory practices have become increasingly “symbolic,” referring to their assertion in everyday social practices rather than through overt force, obscuring both the perpetrator and the illegitimacy of resulting social hierarchies (Bourdieu, 1991). Through the use of symbolic violence, the dominant class cleans its hands and history of discriminatory practices based on race, ethnic, or cultural “difference,” while at the same time justifying increasing inequality on the outcome of “unbiased” market forces. Continuing to experience and perceive discrimination, many Mixtec language speakers are employing silence as a social strategy, in which Mixtecs forgo using, teaching, and learning the Mixtec language in order to create distance between themselves (or children) and stigmatized practices, such as indigenous language use. -
ZAPOTEC-MIXTEC SOCIO-POLITICAL CHANGE 1400-1970 by MARK OTTO GLADE, B.A
r I f^i n iiiáil ZAPOTEC-MIXTEC SOCIO-POLITICAL CHANGE 1400-1970 by MARK OTTO GLADE, B.A. A THESIS IN ANTHROPOLOGY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS AoDroved Accepted May, 1980 Ac 193Ú C^C^Á, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Completion of this thesis required input from many indivi- duals. My family, friends, colleagues, and professors have assisted throughout the preparation of this thesis. I am most indebted to Dr. Evelyn Montgomery, the chairman of my thesis committee. She provided the necessary criticism and encour- agement which resulted in significant improvements over the draft copies. Dr. Nancy Hickerson and Dr. James Goss, my other committee members, also gave valuable suggestions and their assistance is gratefully acknowledged. A special thanks is owed to Richard Salzar who, through his enthusiasm for anthropology, influenced my decision to get a degree in the field. I am also indebted to the many different persons who have helped me in my field trips to the Oaxaca Valley and made this thesis what it is. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vi I. INTRODUCTION 1 Oaxaca Valley 4 Acculturation 7 II. PEASANTS 11 Peasants vs. Tribal . ( 14 Peasants vs. The Larger Whole 15 Corporate Peasant Communities in Mexico. .16 Types of Relations Between the Peasant and the Larger Whole 19 The Process of Integration within Peasant Society 21 Examples of Integration within a Peasant Community 23 Summary 25 III. PRE-CONQUEST 25 The Zapotecs 26 Social Structure and Political Organization of the Zapotecs 31 Dominant Themes of Mesoamerican Culture 31 Zapotec Political and Social Organization Just Prior to Conquest 32 i i i The Mixtec 33 Mixtec Social Organizational Structure 33 Mixtec Urban Development 36 Mixtec Religious Life 37 Mixtec Warfare 37 Political Structure of the Mixtec up to the Conquest 38 IV. -
Documenting Vulnerability: Food Insecurity Among Indigenous Mexican Migrants in California's Central Valley
Documenting Vulnerability: Food Insecurity Among Indigenous Mexican Migrants In California’s Central Valley Copyright David Bacon Katherine Moos Bill Emerson National Hunger Fellow Acknowledgments Thank you and muchísmas gracias to everyone who supported this project: David Bacon, Jessica Bartholow (CAFB), Miranda Carreon (CAFB), Ron Clark (CAFB), Rufino Domínguez Santos (CBDIO), Jonathan Fox (USSC), Bridget Galvan (ACCFB), Terry Garner (CAFB), Christy Getz (UC Berkeley), Rebecca Hester (USSC), Kisha Jackson (CAFB), Daytra Latin (CFB), Oralia Maceda (CBDIO), Nayamín Martínez (CBDIO), Rick Mines, Barbara Mknelly (CDPH), Stephanie Nishio (CDPH), Rosa López (CBDIO), Jeff Ponting (CRLA), Ron Strolic (CIRS), Leoncio Vásquez Santos (CBDIO), Kim McCoy Wade (CAFB), Rachel Winch (CHC), and Cathy Wirth. Special thanks to all of the focus group participants and key informants. Without their willingness to generously and candidly share their time and opinions, this report would not be have been possible. Many thanks to Bill Emerson National Hunger Fellowship Program Staff: Aileen Carr, Shana McDavis-Conway, Joy Wiskin, and the 14th Class of Emerson Hunger Fellows. This material was funded by USDA’s Food Stamp Program through the California Department of Public Health’s Network for a Healthy California. These institutions are equal opportunity providers and employers. The Food Stamp Program provides nutrition assistance to people with low income. It can help buy nutritious foods for a better diet. For information on the Food Stamp Program, call 1-888-328-3483.