Simulation Interoperability (STO-TR-MSG-086-Part-I)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION ORGANIZATION AC/323(MSG-086)TP/562 www.sto.nato.int STO TECHNICAL REPORT TR-MSG-086-Part-I Simulation Interoperability (Interopérabilité de la simulation) Final Report of Task Group MSG-086. Published January 2015 Distribution and Availability on Back Cover NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION ORGANIZATION AC/323(MSG-086)TP/562 www.sto.nato.int STO TECHNICAL REPORT TR-MSG-086-Part-I Simulation Interoperability (Interopérabilité de la simulation) Final Report of Task Group MSG-086. The NATO Science and Technology Organization Science & Technology (S&T) in the NATO context is defined as the selective and rigorous generation and application of state-of-the-art, validated knowledge for defence and security purposes. S&T activities embrace scientific research, technology development, transition, application and field-testing, experimentation and a range of related scientific activities that include systems engineering, operational research and analysis, synthesis, integration and validation of knowledge derived through the scientific method. In NATO, S&T is addressed using different business models, namely a collaborative business model where NATO provides a forum where NATO Nations and partner Nations elect to use their national resources to define, conduct and promote cooperative research and information exchange, and secondly an in-house delivery business model where S&T activities are conducted in a NATO dedicated executive body, having its own personnel, capabilities and infrastructure. The mission of the NATO Science & Technology Organization (STO) is to help position the Nations’ and NATO’s S&T investments as a strategic enabler of the knowledge and technology advantage for the defence and security posture of NATO Nations and partner Nations, by conducting and promoting S&T activities that augment and leverage the capabilities and programmes of the Alliance, of the NATO Nations and the partner Nations, in support of NATO’s objectives, and contributing to NATO’s ability to enable and influence security and defence related capability development and threat mitigation in NATO Nations and partner Nations, in accordance with NATO policies. The total spectrum of this collaborative effort is addressed by six Technical Panels who manage a wide range of scientific research activities, a Group specialising in modelling and simulation, plus a Committee dedicated to supporting the information management needs of the organization. • AVT Applied Vehicle Technology Panel • HFM Human Factors and Medicine Panel • IST Information Systems Technology Panel • NMSG NATO Modelling and Simulation Group • SAS System Analysis and Studies Panel • SCI Systems Concepts and Integration Panel • SET Sensors and Electronics Technology Panel These Panels and Group are the power-house of the collaborative model and are made up of national representatives as well as recognised world-class scientists, engineers and information specialists. In addition to providing critical technical oversight, they also provide a communication link to military users and other NATO bodies. The scientific and technological work is carried out by Technical Teams, created under one or more of these eight bodies, for specific research activities which have a defined duration. These research activities can take a variety of forms, including Task Groups, Workshops, Symposia, Specialists’ Meetings, Lecture Series and Technical Courses. The content of this publication has been reproduced directly from material supplied by STO or the authors. Published January 2015 Copyright © STO/NATO 2015 All Rights Reserved ISBN 978-92-837-0201-2 Single copies of this publication or of a part of it may be made for individual use only by those organisations or individuals in NATO Nations defined by the limitation notice printed on the front cover. The approval of the STO Information Management Systems Branch is required for more than one copy to be made or an extract included in another publication. Requests to do so should be sent to the address on the back cover. ii STO-TR-MSG-086-Part-I Table of Contents Page List of Figures xvi List of Tables xvii MSG-086 Membership List xviii Executive Summary and Synthèse ES-1 Chapter 1 – Introduction 1-1 1.1 Motivation 1-1 1.2 Objective 1-2 1.2.1 Area of Research and Scope 1-2 1.2.2 Specific Goals 1-2 1.2.3 Covered Topics 1-2 1.2.4 Deliverables 1-2 1.3 General Approach 1-3 Chapter 2 – Background Material and Related Work 2-1 2.1 Distributed Simulation Engineering and Execution Process (DSEEP) 2-1 2.2 Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model (LCIM) 2-2 2.3 Fair Fight 2-3 2.4 Related NATO Activities 2-4 2.4.1 MSG-052 “Knowledge Network for Federation Architecture and Design” 2-4 2.4.1.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-4 2.4.2 MSG-058 “Conceptual Modeling for Military Modeling and Simulation” 2-4 2.4.2.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-5 2.4.3 MSG-068 “NATO Education and Training Network (NETN)” 2-5 2.4.3.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-6 2.4.4 MSG-071 “Missionland − A Universal, Generic, Multi-Spectral Simulation 2-6 Environment Database” 2.4.4.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-6 2.4.5 MSG-080 “Security in Collective Mission Simulation” 2-7 2.4.5.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-7 2.4.6 MSG-085 “Standardization for C2-Simulation Interoperation” 2-7 2.4.6.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-8 2.4.7 MSG-098 and MSG-099 Task Groups on “Urban Combat Advanced Training 2-8 Technology” (UCATT 3) 2.4.7.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-8 2.4.8 MSG-106 “Enhanced CAX Architecture, Design, and Methodology – SPHINX” 2-8 2.4.8.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-9 2.4.9 NIAG SG 162 2-9 2.4.9.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-9 STO-TR-MSG-086-Part-I iii 2.5 Related SISO Activities 2-9 2.5.1 DSEEP (Distributed Simulation Engineering and Execution Process) 2-9 2.5.1.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-10 2.5.2 DMAO (DSEEP Multi-Architecture Overlay) 2-10 2.5.2.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-10 2.5.3 FEAT (Federation Engineering Agreements Template) 2-10 2.5.3.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-10 2.5.4 MSDL (Military Scenario Definition Language) 2-10 2.5.4.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-11 2.5.5 SCM (Simulation Conceptual Modeling) 2-11 2.5.5.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-11 2.5.6 RIEDP (Reuse and Interoperation of Environmental Data and Processes) 2-11 2.5.6.1 Relevance for MSG-086 2-11 2.6 Related National Activities 2-11 2.6.1 Germany 2-11 2.6.1.1 SuTBw 2-12 2.6.1.2 SD VIntEL 2-12 2.6.2 Italy 2-12 2.6.2.1 SimLabs 2-12 2.6.2.2 ITB Forza NEC 2-13 2.6.3 Netherlands 2-13 2.6.4 Sweden 2-13 2.6.4.1 Defence Concept Modelling Framework (DCMF) 2-13 2.6.4.2 M&S Architecture and Design Guidelines for Command Training 2-14 Federations Based on the SMART-Net Concept Chapter 3 – Identified Interoperability Issues 3-1 3.1 Issue Group “Conceptual Model” (CM) 3-2 3.2 Issue Group “Federation Development” (FD) 3-4 3.3 Issue Group “Fidelity” (FI) 3-4 3.4 Issue Group “Infrastructure and Tools” (IN) 3-6 3.5 Issue Group “LVC and C2-Sim Coupling” (LC) 3-6 3.6 Issue Group “Organizational and Legal” (OL) 3-7 3.7 Issue Group “Scenario” (SC) 3-8 3.8 Issue Group “Synthetic Environment” (SN) 3-9 3.9 Issue Group “Time Management” (TM) 3-10 3.10 Issue Groups and Statistics 3-12 3.10.1 Rationale 3-12 3.10.2 Procedure 3-12 3.10.3 Results and Interpretation 3-13 3.10.3.1 LCIM 3-13 3.10.3.2 DSEEP Steps 3-14 3.10.3.3 DSEEP Activities 3-16 Chapter 4 – Conclusions and Recommendations 4-1 4.1 Conclusions 4-1 iv STO-TR-MSG-086-Part-I 4.2 Recommendations for Information Product “Scenario” 4-1 4.3 Recommendations for NATO AMSP-01 4-2 4.4 Recommendations for NATO MORS M&S Gap Analysis Questionnaire 4-3 4.5 Recommendations for Future NMSG Activities 4-4 4.5.1 Investigate “M&S as a Service” 4-4 4.5.2 Investigate and Develop Information Products 4-4 4.5.3 Investigate Possibilities for Formal Standards and Support Tools 4-5 4.6 Recommendations for SISO Working Groups 4-5 4.6.1 DSEEP 4-5 4.6.2 FEAT 4-7 4.6.3 SCM 4-7 Chapter 5 – References 5-1 Annex A – Detailed Issue Descriptions A-1 A.1 Issue Group “Conceptual Model” (CM) A-1 A.1.1 CM-01 No Explicit Development of a Conceptual Model A-1 A.1.1.1 Problem Definition A-1 A.1.1.2 Extended Problem Description A-1 A.1.1.3 Related Work A-1 A.1.1.4 Connection to LCIM Level A-2 A.1.1.5 Connection to DSEEP Steps and Artifacts A-2 A.1.1.6 Possible Solution Approaches A-2 A.1.1.7 Existing Implementations and Their Information Products A-2 A.1.1.8 Recommended Information Products A-2 A.1.1.9 Examples/Prototypes of Selected Information Products A-2 A.1.2 CM-02 Missing Standards for Development of Conceptual Models for A-2 Distributed Simulation Environments A.1.2.1 Problem Definition A-2 A.1.2.2 Extended Problem Description A-3 A.1.2.3 Related Work A-3 A.1.2.4 Connection to LCIM Level A-3 A.1.2.5 Connection to DSEEP Steps and Artifacts A-4 A.1.2.6 Possible Solution Approaches A-4 A.1.2.7 Existing Implementations and Their Information Products A-4 A.1.2.8 Recommended Information Products A-4 A.1.2.9 Examples/Prototypes of Selected Information Products A-4 A.1.3 CM-03 Missing Reference Conceptual Models A-4 A.1.3.1 Problem Definition A-4 A.1.3.2 Extended Problem Description A-4 A.1.3.3 Related Work A-5 A.1.3.4 Connection to LCIM Level A-6 A.1.3.5 Connection to DSEEP Steps and Artifacts A-6 A.1.3.6 Possible Solution Approaches A-6 A.1.3.7 Existing Implementations and Their Information Products A-6 A.1.3.8 Recommended Information Products A-6 A.1.3.9 Examples/Prototypes of Selected Information Products A-6 STO-TR-MSG-086-Part-I v A.1.4 CM-04 Lack of Standard Methodologies, Techniques and Tools for Automated