Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Meet with the District of Lillooet to Discuss the Potential of Long Term Funding Contributions for the Bear Aware Program

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda April 27, 2009; 10:30 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC

Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 1 Call to Order 9

2 Approval of Agenda 9

3 Committee Reports and Recommendations

3.1 Electoral Area Directors Committee Recommendations of n/a 9 April 14, 2009:

1. Development Variance Permit #74 Bralorne, Area A - Cizinsky THAT a Development Variance Permit for Lot 11, DL 2372, LLD, Plan 5847, to allow a relaxation to the side yard setback from 4.5m to 1.2m be approved, and that the issuance of the permit be authorized.

2. Emergency Planning Tabletop Exercise for the Fountain Valley - Tom Grantham and PEP THAT Staff seek funding opportunities to conduct a tabletop exercise for the Fountain Valley for emergency purposes.

3. Upper Cheakamus Road THAT Staff gather information and recommend solutions regarding ownership, maintenance and repair of the Upper Cheakamus Road.

4. Pemberton & District Chamber of Commerce Visitor Information Centre – Request for Funding THAT a $2500 contribution be made to the Pemberton and District Chamber of Commerce Visitor Information Centre.

5. Carol Bethune – Request for Assistance for Spring Cleanup in Bralorne THAT Staff respond to Carol Bethune’s letter to thank her for the suggestions and inform her that there are costs involved for such programmes.

6. Sue Senger - Bear Smart Funding Request SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 2 - April 27, 2009

Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info THAT the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District meet with the District of Lillooet to discuss the potential of long term funding contributions for the Bear Aware Program.

7. Bridge River Valley Economic Development 1. THAT the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District request the Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society provide their 2009 proposed budget and future plans to avoid similar requests for advance funding in the future.

2. THAT the Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society be requested to provide information pertaining to the alleged missing files as reported to the RCMP.

3.2 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee n/a 9 Recommendations of April 14, 2009:

1. Pemberton Seniors Society – Request for Funding THAT $3000 be contributed to the Pemberton Valley Senior’s Society for the Seniors Fitness Program.

2. Pemberton Chamber of Commerce – Barn Dance THAT a conditional letter of support be provided to the Pemberton and District Chamber of Commerce for the Annual Barn Dance, subject to the Chamber of Commerce conducting neighbourhood consultation and meeting all requirements of the Special Events Permit.

3. Pemberton Youth Soccer Association – Request for Funding THAT the Pemberton Youth Soccer Association be requested to submit their 2009 request for funding assistance, including their 2008/2009 budget

4. Pemberton Arts Council – Request for Funding THAT a letter be sent to the Pemberton Arts Council in support of their Grant application of Arts Partners in Creative Development funding.

5. Quad Riders ATV Association of BC – Request for

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 2 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 3 - April 27, 2009

Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info Assistance THAT the October 29, 2008 Quad Riders ATV Association of B.C. correspondence be referred to the Pemberton Valley ATV Club, requesting they provide direction to the Quad Riders ATV Association of B.C.

3.3 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission n/a 9 Recommendations of April 6, 2009:

1. Pemberton Music Festival THAT Staff prepare a brief on policing costs and other issues of the 2008 Pemberton Festival as soon as possible.

2. Economic Development Consultant’s March Monthly Report THAT Directors Gimse and Sturdy discuss with the Regional Board the Economic Development Commission agenda distribution procedures.

4 Bylaws

4.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote

4.1.1 Bylaw 1008 – Electoral Area C Official Community Plan 10 9 Bylaw No. 689, 1999 Amendment Bylaw No. 1008, 2008

THAT Bylaw No. 1008, cited as “Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689, 1999 Amendment Bylaw No. 1008, 2008” be adopted.

4.1.2 Bylaw 1113 - Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral 81 9 Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009

1. THAT agency comments be received.

2. THAT Bylaw 1113, cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009’ be read a second time.

3. THAT the Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District delegate the holding of a public hearing to Electoral Area ‘C’

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 3 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 4 - April 27, 2009

Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info Director Susan Gimse, with Director______as alternate delegate pursuant to Section 891 of the Local Government Act, for the consideration of Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009.

4. THAT the public hearing for consideration of Bylaw No. 1113, 2009 be held at 7 PM on Tuesday, May 19, 2009 at the Birken Community Centre (Old School House).

4.1.3 Bylaw 1129 - Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral 93 9 Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009

1. THAT Bylaw No. 1129 cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1129, 2009’ be introduced and read a first time.

2. THAT Bylaw No. 1129 be referred to the Lil’wat Nation, Lower Stl’atl’imx Tribal Council, and provincial agencies for comment.

3. THAT the applicant provide proof of water prior to adoption of Bylaw No. 1129 that confirms an adequate supply of water for each proposed parcel, of suitable quality as defined by Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality water, is available.

4.1.4 Bylaw 1130 - Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Emergency 98 9 Program and Disaster Operations By-law No. 1130-2009 (EAD Committee Recommendation)

THAT By-law No. 1130, cited as the “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Emergency Program and Disaster Operations By-law No. 1130-2009” be introduced and read a first, second, and third time.

4.1.5 Bylaw No. 1073 - Electoral Area B Official Community Plan 103 9 Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 4 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 5 - April 27, 2009

Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 1. THAT agency comments regarding Bylaw 1073, 2008 be received.

2. That Bylaw 1073, 2008 be amended as recommended in the attached report.

3. THAT Bylaw No. 1073, 2008, cited as ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008’ be read a second time as amended.

4. THAT the Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District delegate the holding of a public hearing to Electoral Area ‘B’ Director Macri, with Director Oakley as alternate delegate pursuant to Section 891 of the Local Government Act, for the consideration of ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008.’

5. THAT the public hearing for consideration of Bylaw No. 1073, 2008 be held at 7 PM on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 at the Lillooet Recreation Centre, Lillooet, BC.

4.2 Weighted Corporate Vote – All Directors

5 Staff Reports and Other Business

5.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote

5.1.1 Village of Pemberton Zoning Amendment (OR104) Referral 192 9

THAT the following comments (and Staff report) regarding the referral of an application to amend the Village of Pemberton Zoning Bylaw No. 408, 2008 with respect to Lot 1, Plan 29481, DL 203, LLD be forwarded to the Village of Pemberton:

a) SLRD interests are not impacted, and further consultation is not necessary; b) We note that the proposed change to the Village of Pemberton Zoning Bylaw is consistent with the policy direction of the SLRD Regional Growth Strategy and SLRD Electoral Area C Official Community Plan, in that it will:

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 5 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 6 - April 27, 2009

Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info i) Concentrate mixed use development into existing settlement areas, maintaining a compact urban form & accommodating growth within the urban boundaries of Pemberton, allowing for increased population density; and ii) Support the Village of Pemberton as the established business and service centre.

5.1.2 Development Variance Permit # 77 Britannia Beach – 205 9 Britannia Oceanfront Developments

THAT the Board approve and authorize the issuance of Development Variance Permit #77, to vary the provisions of SLRD Sign Bylaw No, 681 to permit a project development sign 3.5m high by 5.79m wide on the subject property at Britannia Beach.

5.1.3 Trails & Open Spaces Risk Management Policy 212 9

1. THAT the Trails and Open Spaces Risk Management Policy be adopted for the following services:

- Britannia Beach Parks and Trails Service - Furry Creek Open Space Maintenance Service - Sea to Sky Corridor Regional Trails Service - Pemberton Valley Recreational Trails Service - Porteau Cove Parks and Open Space Service

- Trail Types - Mountain Bike Trail difficulty Levels - Supporting Guidelines and Standards - TTF Construction Standards - Fall Zone Guidelines - Sign Guidelines - Management Guidelines - Terminology

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 6 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 7 - April 27, 2009

Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 5.1.4 Septic Easement Agreement for Britannia Beach 236 9

THAT the Board authorize the Septic Easement Agreement in favour of Britannia Oceanfront Developments Corporation and MacDonald Development Corporation;

AND THAT the Chair and CAO be authorized to execute the agreement.

5.1.5 Temporary Use Permit #16 – Canadian Snowmobile 249 9 (Callaghan Valley)

1. THAT Temporary Use Permit No. 16 be amended as follows: (a) clause 4b is amended to better reflect the intent of the Riparian Area Regulations and make reference to the ravine that Callaghan Creek is flowing through; (b) clause 4k is amended to exclude the Department of National Defence temporary security tents and buildings from design guidelines; (c) clause 4m is amended to reflect SPCA best management practices that are currently in place (dogs are kept in enclosures rather than chained to dog houses); and, (d) clause 4n is amended to provide more detail on the site reclamation.

2. THAT Temporary Use Permit No. 16 be issued for a period of two years.

5.1.6 June/July 2009 Board Meeting Location n/a 9

5.1.7 Regional Growth Strategy Update n/a 9

6 Correspondence Requesting Action

6.1 Royal Canadian Legion – Request for Support 262 9

6.2 Integrated Land Management Bureau – South Coast First Nations 268 9 Consultation Coordination

CAO Recommendation:

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 7 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 8 - April 27, 2009

Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 1. THAT the SLRD Board applaud the multi-agency coordinated approach by the Province

2. THAT the SLRD Board recommend that work commence on means for engagement with local governments in this new process.

6.3 Ambulance Paramedics of BC – Request for Support 275 9

7 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes

7.1 Regular Board Meeting Minutes – March 23, 2009 276 9 For confirmation as circulated or as corrected.

7.2 Special Board Meeting Minutes – April 14, 2009 295 9 For confirmation as circulated or as corrected.

7.3 Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Minutes – April 14, 297 9 2009 Receipt for information.

7.4 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting 302 9 Minutes – April 14, 2009 Receipt for information.

7.5 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission 307 9 Meeting Minutes – April 6, 2009 Receipt for information.

8 Business Arising from the Minutes

9 Consent Items – Correspondence for Information

9.1 Ministry of Community Development - Funds to the SLRD 310 9

9.2 Furry Creek Community Association – Porteau Cove Bluffs 314 9

9.3 Director Macri - Appointment of Resource Person for District of 316 9 Lillooet

9.4 Gems Education – Rezoning Application on Ravens Crest Site 318 9

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 8 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 9 - April 27, 2009

Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 9.5 District of Lillooet – First Nations’ Highway 99 Concerns 319 9

10 Delegations and Petitions

10.1 Gord McKeever, Project Manager & Robin Harvey, Fundraiser - n/a 9 Sea to Sky Trails Update

10.2 Nigel Protter – Regional Power Group, Ryan River Update n/a 9

11 Decision on Late Business (only if required) 9

THAT the late items be considered at this meeting. (requires 2/3 majority vote)

12 Late Business

13 Directors’ Reports (matters of information, not requiring action)

14 Termination 9

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 9 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 10 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 11 of 323 SQUAMISH LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO. 1008, 2008

A by-law of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District to amend the Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689, 1999.

WHEREAS the Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District wishes to adopt a new Electoral Area C Official Community Plan;

NOW THEREFORE, the Regional Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:

1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689, 1999 Amendment Bylaw No. 1008, 2008.”

2. Schedules A and B to Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689, 1999 are deleted and replaced by Schedule A which is attached to and forms part of this bylaw. 3. Schedule A of the Duffey Lake Corridor Official Community Plan Adoption By-law No. 479, 1992 is amended by deleting lands located within Electoral Area C on Maps 1, 2 and 3.

READ A FIRST TIME this 28th day of January , 2008. READ A SECOND TIME this 25th day of August , 2008. PUBLIC HEARING held on the 6th & 8th day of October , 2008. READ A THIRD TIME this 27th day of October , 2008. APPROVED BY THE MINISTER OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT on the 26th day of March, 2009. ADOPTED this day of , 2009.

Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer

I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Bylaw No. 1008 cited as “Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689, 1999 Amendment Bylaw No. 1008, 2008” as read a third time.

Paul R. Edgington Secretary

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 20091 Page 12 of 323 ELECTORAL AREA COFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN SCHEDULE A

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 3

PLANNING PROCESS 3 AMENDING THE PLAN 4

COMMUNITY 4

1. COMMUNITY GROWTH AND CHARACTER 4 2. CULTURAL HERITAGE 7 3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 8

LAND USE 11

4. RURAL RESIDENTIAL 11 5. SPECIAL PLANNING AREA 14 6. AGRICULTURE 18 7. COMMERCIAL LANDS 24 8. INDUSTRIAL LANDS 27 9. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LANDS 29 10. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA 32 11. PUBLIC LANDS &FACILITIES 33 12. PARKS 35

SERVICES & INFRASTRUCTURE 37

13. UTILITIES AND SERVICES 37 14. TRANSPORTATION 40 15. TRAIL NETWORK PLAN 42

NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 46

16. BIODIVERSITY 46 17. NATURAL HAZARDS 50

GLOSSARY 55

MAPS 57

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 20092 Page 13 of 323 INTRODUCTION

The purpose of an Official Community Plan (OCP) is to provide direction for land use and development within a given area. The Electoral Area C OCP contains objectives, policies, and land use designations adopted by the Board of Directors of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District. Based on the community’s economic, social, and environmental values, the objectives and policies of the plan are meant to balance the demands placed on the land base in order to ensure an equitable, comprehensive, and logical distribution of land uses. Policies are often implemented on a long-term basis, generally over at least a five to ten year period.

The OCP provides a basis for the following:

a. A framework for land use decisions and regulations, including zoning bylaws; b. The direction of public and private investment to develop in designated areas in a manner that is consistent with the objectives of the community; c. Acknowledgement of First Nations, adjacent municipalities and provincial and federal government interests in land use planning and management in Electoral Area C; and, d. The guidance of elected officials and others having statutory approval authority, in the evaluation of proposals which may necessitate the amendment of existing bylaws and regulations.

PLANNING PROCESS

The Area C Official Community Plan was originally adopted in 1999. The review of this plan was initiated in 2005. Invitations for early participation in the review process were sent to adjacent local governments, the Lil’wat Nation, the School District, and provincial government agencies.

Consultation with the Village of Pemberton, Lil’wat Nation, Resort Municipality of Whistler various provincial government ministries and agencies (Ministries of Transportation, Forests and Range, Health, and Environment; the Integrated Land Management Bureau and the Agricultural Land Commission), and School District 48 also occurred throughout the process of developing the updated OCP.

In the interest of effective regional planning, the recommendations of a sub area planning study involving the Village of Pemberton, the Lil’wat Nation lands, and adjacent Area C lands have been incorporated into this OCP.

Three rounds of public open houses/information meetings were held in Pemberton and Birken during the course of the plan review. The Electoral Area C Agricultural Advisory Committee played a strong role in the review and strengthening of the agricultural objectives and policies. Informal consultations also occurred with community groups such as the Pemberton Valley Trails Association and individual property owners and residents.

Following first reading of the bylaw, a public hearing was held to provide an opportunity for formal comment on the plan in bylaw form.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 20093 Page 14 of 323 AMENDING THE PLAN

An OCP is not intended to be a static document, but adaptable to new trends within society and responsive to changing circumstances within the community. As such, following careful consideration by the Board, policies and land use designations in this OCP may be revised by an amending bylaw pursuant to provisions outlined in the Local Government Act. A comprehensive review of the Official Community Plan should occur every five to ten years.

COMMUNITY

1. COMMUNITY GROWTH AND CHARACTER

Context

Electoral Area C is a region of approximately 5600 km2 located in the Coast Mountains of British Columbia (see Figure 1). The region is characterized by numerous rivers, productive agricultural lands, and steep mountainous areas. The residents of Electoral Area C are principally located in the Pemberton Fringe, Pemberton Meadows, the Mount Currie - D’Arcy Corridor, and Lillooet Lake Estates. A new neighbourhood, Green River Estates, consisting of 108 residential strata lots is planned for District Lot 2247 just north of the Resort Municipality of Whistler boundary. At build out Green River Estates could account for 10 - 15 percent of the Electoral Area C population.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 20094 Page 15 of 323 Electoral Area C falls within the traditional territories of the Lil'wat, N’Quat’qua, In-SHUCK-ch and Squamish Nations. The land within Area C has supported the hunting, gathering and cultural activities of aboriginal people for thousands of years.

Pemberton has experienced tremendous growth over the last two decades. Electoral Area C has not experienced these same levels of growth but in general the population has seen small increases over time. Between the 1996 and 2001 census periods Whistler grew by 24% and the Village of Pemberton grew by 91%. Within this same period, the population of Electoral Area C dropped by almost 3%.

In the 2006 census, the population of Electoral Area C was recorded as 1887, a 26 percent increase over the 2001 population of 1499. During the same period the population of the Village of Pemberton increased by over one-third from 1650 to about 2200 and First Nations population on Indian Reserves increased by about 10 percent to about 1500. Historic population levels and growth rates are shown in Table 1:

TABLE 1: HISTORIC POPULATION AND GROWTH RATES

POPULATION Percent Growth (annual Year Area C IR Pemberton Total growth rate) 1976 910 904 301 2,115 1981 1,008 904 285 2,197 3.9 (0.8) 1986 1,063 900 350 2,313 5.3 (1.0) 1991 1,333 834 502 2,669 15.4 (2.9) 1996 1,547 1,267 857 3,671 37.5 (6.6) 2001 1,499 1,360 1,642 4,501 22.6 (4.2) 2006 1,887 1,490 2,192 5,569 23.7 (4.4) Source: Statistic Canada census data; SLRD 2000; Stratis and Askey, 2005; Lil’wat Nation; INAC and Ecotrust

Within the plan area there are a number of Indian Reserves, which are home to the Lil’wat and N’Quat’qua Nations. First Nations people residing on the Indian Reserves the total population of Area C up to approximately 3400 people. While the population living on these Reserves do impact planning decisions within the Electoral Area C, Indian Reserves fall under federal jurisdiction and are not subject to land use regulations of the Regional District. The Lil’wat and N’Quat’qua Nations have prepared land use and economic development plans for their reserve lands and traditional territories. The Area C OCP plan area also excludes lands within municipal boundaries, namely the Village of Pemberton and the Resort Municipality of Whistler.

As of 2006, Electoral Area C is a small rural community, home to long-time residents with agricultural roots, young families new to the area, part time residents, and the growing Lil’wat and N’Quat’qua Nations. Future direction for the growth of the community and the way in which the community character evolves, particularly in light of the changes expected to come with the 2010 Olympics, should be a reflection of all those that live there.

Considering the population trends of neighboring municipalities, and the anticipated impacts of the 2010 Olympics, in is expected that the population of Electoral Area C will see moderate population growth over the next decade.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 20095 Page 16 of 323 Objectives

To ensure the development of the community progresses in a way that is responsive to the values, needs and concerns of the residents. To reflect the goals, priorities, and land use direction provided by the SLRD Regional Growth Strategy. To provide for the long term population growth needs for Area C and Pemberton. To recognize existing long-standing land uses within the area.

Policies

1.1. The objectives, policies, and land use designations within this plan are adopted with the understanding that existing long-standing land and subsurface uses may continue. 1.2. The Regional District supports the application of smart growth principles to all new developments. Smart growth principles for the SLRD include: a. Direct urban development towards existing communities (avoiding urban and rural sprawl); b. Build compact, mixed-use neighbourhoods; c. Create walkable communities; d. Promote a variety of low impact transportation options; e. Advocate for a range of affordable housing options; f. Foster distinct, attractive, economically sustainable communities with a strong sense of place; g. Protect and promote responsible stewardship of green spaces and sensitive areas; h. Ensure the integrity of a productive agricultural and forestry land base; i. Ensure energy efficient infrastructure; j. Ensure early and ongoing public involvement that respects community values and visions k. Cultivate a culture of cooperation, coordination and collaboration between local governments, provincial agencies, federal agencies, and first nations. 1.3. The development of community advisory groups and other community project committees is encouraged, to allow for increased participation and influence by residents of Electoral Area C on future developments and planning projects. 1.4. In planning for developments of regional significance, consideration shall be given to aboriginal land use values, as described in the Lil’wat Traditional Territory Land Use Plan. 1.5. The Regional District encourages the Lil’wat, N’Quat’qua, and In-SHUCK-Ch Nations to develop those lands currently designated as Indian Reserves, or other lands placed under aboriginal governance in the future, in a manner that preserves the rural character of the area and is complementary to this plan. 1.6. The Regional District encourages provincial agencies and the Lil’wat, N’Quat’qua, and In-SHUCK-Ch Nations to engage in regular meetings to productively coordinate activities in a way that continues to build bridges between governments.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 20096 Page 17 of 323 2. CULTURAL HERITAGE

Context

Archeological evidence of the long inhabitation of the region by the St'át'imc Nation includes ancient villages, pit houses, culturally modified trees, cemeteries, pictographs, stone tools, and ceremonial sites. Many of these artifacts are recorded in the provincial archeological inventory. In the Pemberton Valley and the Birkenhead River Valley there are pit houses and culturally modified trees. The Gates Lake area is significant to aboriginal legends of the Transformer and boundaries of the Lil’wat and N’Quat’qua Nations. Alongside Lillooet Lake there are many grave sites dating back to the small pox epidemic of the late 19th century, the remains of ancient villages, and ceremonial sites. The Soo Valley is also significant for its ceremonial sites.

In the 1850s, the village of Pemberton was established at the head of Lillooet Lake and the settlement of D’Arcy was established at the head of Anderson Lake. During the Cariboo gold rush D’Arcy was a busy shipping and transference point on the Douglas Road, a gold rush era transportation route from the coast to British Columbia’s interior. By the early 1880s, the Pemberton area began to see European settlement on the rich farm lands. The railway line arrived in 1924, bringing with it increased settlement. It wasn’t until 1975 that Highway 99 was developed north of Whistler and into Pemberton. In 1991, finalization of the paving of the Duffey Lake Road enhanced the transportation linkage between Pemberton and Lillooet. Within the Village of Pemberton, the Pemberton Museum provides a record of the history of the area.

Objective To encourage and facilitate the identification, protection and conservation of heritage resources, including historical buildings, archaeological sites and historic trails.

Policies

2.1. The Regional District supports the preservation of Nt’ákmen Areas, as described in the Lil’wat Traditional Territory Land Use Plan and shown on Map 4 - Nt’ákmen Areas, to provide a place for the harvesting of traditional resources, maintaining intact wilderness, excluding resource extraction, and providing economic opportunities for low impact tourism. 2.2. Development proponents shall consider the significance of heritage resources during all phases of project planning, design, implementation and operation. 2.3. The development of a heritage inventory and designation of heritage trails by interested parties is encouraged. 2.4. The Regional District shall promote the use of St'át'imc place names.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 20097 Page 18 of 323 3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Context

The key industries in the plan area include tourism, agriculture, and forestry. There are a significant number of home based businesses, including telecommuters, consultants, and crafters. The unemployment rate in Area C is lower than the provincial average. Factors limiting economic development include competition from Squamish in the housing market, the high price of land, and distance from the population center of Vancouver.

Employment in the tourism industry is expected to rise, particularly with the 2010 Olympics being hosted in Vancouver and Whistler. The number of workers residing within Whistler falls short of the demand generated by the resort. This shortfall is expected to increase dramatically during the Olympics. Area C itself has a growing tourism economy, which has potential for further expansion, particularly related to accommodation for Whistler and area visitors, and summer tourism activity.

Tourism is recognized as an economic opportunity, but the potential negative impacts on the environment and cultural resources are also recognized. As is stated in the Lil’wat Land Use Plan, tourism is generally supported given that the industry is managed carefully under a comprehensive tourism strategy, meaningful consultation is carried out, the impacts of motorized recreation is limited, and recreation tenures are carefully allocated.

The Pemberton Valley continues to be an important seed potato producer, however, the agricultural industry in Area C has seen continued diversification. A vineyard, extensive equestrian facilities, food and accommodation, agricultural festivals and events, and other agritourism operations are being developed.

Objectives

To foster a diversified economy that supports commercial activity at scales and locations that meet local and visitor needs and contributes to the continued economic viability of Electoral Area C. Foster a variety of recreational opportunities for residents and visitors, where both direct and indirect employment benefits for local residents can be realized. Promote the development of home based business opportunities which are compatible with the rural character of the plan area.

Policies

3.1. Provide for commercial development in Electoral Area C that serves local needs, facilitates tourism, or contributes to more complete communities. 3.2. Provide for industrial development in Area C that focuses on natural resource industries and local community needs. 3.3. The Regional District encourages and supports the continued development of commercial activity which requires an urban setting, such as larger-scale, intensive retail and office space, within the boundaries of the Village of Pemberton.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 20098 Page 19 of 323 3.4. Pursuant to section 920.2 of the Local Government Act, all lands within the plan area are designated as areas where temporary commercial or industrial uses may be allowed and which may be permitted through an application to the Regional District. 3.5. Future rezonings, subdivisions, and building permits for commercial properties should promote the use of the land by small- and medium-format businesses that are locally responsive and preserve the character of the area. 3.6. The provision of the best and most current communication systems is encouraged. 3.7. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range to protect the scenic values along all highway corridors. Land use and design regulations should be developed by the SLRD for development within the Community/Crown Land Interface Area shown on Map 8b, especially along scenic highway areas such as the Highway 99 corridor between Whistler and Pemberton. Actions should include: a. amendment of the zoning bylaw to incorporate screening and landscaping requirements to screen uses from the highway right of way in accordance with s. 909 of the Local Government Act; b. the requirement for a visual assessment for all proposed commercial or industrial development; c. strict enforcement of Sign Bylaw No. 681 and Zoning Bylaw 765 which prohibit billboards and third party advertising; d. implementation of design guidelines for all other signage and any proposed industrial or commercial development within the Community/Crown Land Interface Area shown on Map 8.

Home-based Business

3.8. In order to provide economic opportunities compatible with the rural life-styles of plan area residents, home based business and home industry will be permitted in the Rural Residential and Resource Management designations subject to zoning regulations to ensure compatibility with adjacent properties. 3.9. Where a home industry involves food intended for human consumption approval and, where necessary, permitting from the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority shall be obtained.

Tourism

3.10. For as long as the Hurley River Forest Service Road remains unplowed in the winter, the Regional District supports the use of the road by snowmobiles by encouraging the provision of snowmobile related services and a parking area at the south end of the road. 3.11. The Regional District supports the development of a Lil’wat Outdoor Centre in Skelula (Owl Creek). 3.12. The Regional District supports the development of a comprehensive tourism strategy for Area C and Pemberton.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 20099 Page 20 of 323 3.13. The Regional District discourages the Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Tourism, Sport, and the Arts from granting further tenures for motorized commercial recreation in the Commercial Recreation Buffer, indicated on Map 3 - Recreation.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200910 Page 21 of 323 LAND USE

4. RURAL RESIDENTIAL

Context

Residential settlement in Area C is largely comprised of two linear corridors emanating northeast and northwest of the Village of Pemberton, known as the Mount Currie – D’Arcy Corridor and the Pemberton Valley respectively. Another settlement, Lillooet Lake Estates, which is governed by a Land Use Contract, is a rural community of about 160 residential lot sites on the north eastern shore of Lillooet Lake. All neighbourhoods are predominantly of rural character. Generally, concentrated forms of residential land uses, such as single family dwellings on urban-sized lots and multi-family townhouse and apartment complexes, are located within the boundaries of the Village of Pemberton.

The Pemberton Meadows and Pemberton Fringe neighbourhoods lie within the Pemberton Valley. Pemberton Meadows is a predominantly agricultural community of highly productive farmland. In general the parcels are large (greater than 15 hectares) and have been maintained as working farms. Much of the area is found within the floodplain of the Lillooet River and is under the jurisdiction of the Agricultural Land Commission as Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR).

The Pemberton Fringe area is primarily a farming community of large lots; however, the area is host to several small pockets of urban-sized residential lots (0.1 to 0.8 hectares), small acreage rural residential properties within the ALR, and urban-type uses such as the Pemberton Community Centre. Given the natural beauty of the agricultural lands, there is significant development pressure in these areas; however, to protect farm land and avoid flood hazards, it is generally preferred that future growth be accommodated in hillsides areas adjacent to existing urban development.

Mount Currie, Ivey Lake, Walkerville, Owl Ridge, Poole Creek, Birken, Devine, and D’Arcy are the principle neighbourhoods in the Mount Currie – D’Arcy Corridor. The Mount Currie – D’Arcy Corridor is home to a series of small, historic communities and more recently, large lot subdivisions with 2 hectare lots. This valley has a number of development constraints, including Agricultural Land Reserve, flood hazards, and geotechnical hazards associated with the mountainous terrain. Mount Currie is largely agricultural land and Indian Reserve. Parcels are generally large, with only a few lots less than one hectare. There are some significant constraints to development of the hillside areas outside of Mount Currie, including steep slopes, water availability, and the cost of servicing.

Protecting the rural character of the area is a priority for residents of the Mount Currie – D’Arcy Corridor. Opportunities to provide for rural residential development on one hectare lots are generally supported. However, residents have expressed a desire to review proposals for one hectare lot subdivisions through site specific rezoning applications. In the Ivey Lake/Reid Road area, the majority of residents appear to be supportive of a neighbourhood change to a one hectare minimum, subject to adequate on-site water supply being demonstrated.

A third corridor subject to future residential development pressure is the Whistler-Pemberton corridor. The Green River Estates is planned just north of the Resort Municipality of Whistler’s

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200911 Page 22 of 323 boundaries. Proposals have also been discussed for the Soo Valley. Residential development in the Whistler-Pemberton corridor is not supported over the life of this plan.

Lillooet Lake Estates is the largest community at Lillooet Lake with approximately 160 designated residential sites. In addition there are approximately 20 rural residential lots at Twin Creeks and a group of another 20 lots near the south end of the lake.

The rural character that typifies the plan area and the pressure to provide land for housing, community facilities, or commercial enterprises emphasizes the need to strike a balance between rural preservation and development. A number of variables confound the projected demand for housing in Area C: varying estimates of future rates of population growth, demand for housing as the 2010 Olympics approaches and the Whistler workforce expands, and variable market conditions in the Sea to Sky Corridor.

Another issue relating to residential development in Area C is housing affordability. The 2010 Olympics and the resulting focus on the Sea to Sky Corridor are predicted by some to further increase the price of real estate.

Objectives

To encourage the location of urban development forms, such as small lot residential subdivision and community facilities, within the Village of Pemberton’s core area, without precluding the establishment of localized facilities to serve plan area residents. To promote development consistent with the existing rural and semi-rural character of the area. To facilitate the provision of a range of housing choices. To ensure the planning, design, and construction of energy efficient neighbourhoods and buildings to minimize greenhouse gas emissions, maximize energy conservation, and improve air and water quality.

Policies

4.1. Lands set aside for residential development are indicated on Map 1- Land Use Designations as Rural Residential. 4.2. Permitted uses in Rural Residential areas are a single family home, a secondary suite, home-based businesses, home industry, accessory buildings, and ancillary uses related to the above. 4.3. Heavy industrial uses such as auto wrecking, manufacture of concrete products, bulk fuel or chemical storage or refining depots, animal or agriculture products processing, or the production of animal feeds are not considered appropriate home industry uses. 4.4. A high standard of energy efficiency for all new residential construction is encouraged: a. Consider incorporating energy efficiency objectives into zoning amendment bylaws; b. Density bonusing may be considered where alternative energy systems or other innovative sustainability initiatives are proposed. 4.5. Subject to soil conditions, geotechnical hazards, water supply, and policies for the preservation of agricultural land, in all Rural Residential areas the minimum parcel area shall be 2 hectares.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200912 Page 23 of 323 4.6. Where suitable conditions exist and where maintaining an overall density of 2 hectare parcels is desirable, the Regional District will consider development applications that propose to cluster housing together on lots smaller than 2 hectares provided the density for the entire development area remains at 1 lot per 2 hectares.

Affordable Housing

4.7. Affordable housing should be distributed throughout the plan area. 4.8. Existing mobile home parks are recognized as valuable contributors to the affordable housing base. 4.9. New mobile home parks may be considered in Rural Residential designated areas subject to meeting the following conditions: a. Mobile home park land use zoning in the zoning bylaw; b. Servicing with community water and sewer systems; and, c. Establishment of a comprehensive site plan showing lay out of the pads, internal road circulation, and extent of buffering from adjacent non-mobile home land uses. 4.10. Where a rezoning would result in a net loss of affordable housing units, the regional district shall negotiate with the proponent to provide compensation for the loss of these units. This may include a relocation allowance, assistance with relocation, replacing affordable housing on-site, or other innovative approaches. 4.11. The Regional District shall consider, within the framework of section 904 of the Local Government Act (zoning for amenities and affordable housing) the following to encourage the provision of affordable housing: a. Inclusionary zoning of 10 to 15 per cent affordable housing in new developments. b. A requirement for financial contributions where it may not be feasible to or a developer does not wish to include affordable housing in a development. The developer may instead pay a levy, which goes into a fund to provide for affordable housing. c. Density bonuses for the provision of affordable housing by permitting more intensive development than might otherwise be allowed.

Pemberton Meadows

4.12. In the interest of preventing rural sprawl, maintaining compact communities, and preventing agriculture/urban interface problems, extensive hillside developments in the Pemberton Meadows are not supported.

Mount Currie

4.13. Future rezoning applications for small scale multifamily or seniors housing in Mount Currie will be considered on a site-specific basis taking into account compatibility with adjacent uses, consistency with the existing neighbourhood character, the desires of neighbouring residents as expressed at a public hearing, infrastructure servicing capacity, and flood hazards.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200913 Page 24 of 323 4.14. Ivey and Mosquito Lakes shall be protected from future water front development and maintained as undeveloped lakes for the use of wildlife and public recreation.

Mount Currie – D’Arcy Corridor

4.15. Compact forms of development will be encouraged based on development potentials identified in this plan. In D’Arcy, for example, there is a substantial amount of rural residential designated land and in future the opportunity to develop a compact, complete community based on smart growth principles and the overall development potential identified in this plan should be pursued. 4.16. Future rezoning applications for small scale multifamily or seniors housing in D’Arcy will be considered on a site-specific basis taking into account compatibility with adjacent uses, consistency with the existing neighbourhood character, the desires of neighbouring residents as expressed at a public hearing, and infrastructure servicing capacity. 4.17. The Sutherland Road neighbourhood in the Birken area, as identified on Map 1 – Land Use Designations, will be maintained as a two hectare minimum parcel area subdivision. 4.18. Outside of the Sutherland Road neighbourhood, the minimum parcel size for Rural Residential designated lands in the Mt. Currie - D’Arcy corridor may be amended, through a site specific rezoning application, to one hectare, subject to conformance with suitability criteria such as soil conditions, slope, geotechnical hazards, and water supply. 4.19. In the Ivey Lake/Reid Road neighbourhood, only those parcels serviced by wells that provide 2720 liters/day on a sustained basis throughout the year for each proposed parcel, and provide water of suitable quality as defined by Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality, shall be considered for rezoning to permit one hectare parcels. 4.20. Due to concerns about possible impacts on groundwater supplies, those lands rezoned to permit one hectare parcels in the Ivey Lake/Reid Road neighbourhood (including Lots 1- 13 & Lots 19-32, DL 2679 and Lots 14-18 and Lots 33 to 51, DL 4100, all Plan 33675, LLD) are permitted only one dwelling per parcel (including secondary suite).

Lillooet Lake Area 4.21. Any future residential or recreational development at Lillooet Lake Estates must continue to be small in scale, low impact, environmentally sensitive and reflect the rural nature of the area. 4.22. Further subdivisions for the provision of recreation or residential properties at Lillooet Lake are discouraged.

Whistler - Pemberton Corridor

4.23. Residential development in the Whistler-Pemberton Corridor, including the Soo and Rutherford Valleys, is discouraged.

5. SPECIAL PLANNING AREA

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200914 Page 25 of 323 Context A subregional planning study for SLRD Electoral Area C, the Village of Pemberton, and the Lil’wat Nation was undertaken in 2007 in conjunction with the Regional Growth Strategy. The planning process included assessments of population, demographics, and land suitability for development. This information informed an estimate of future requirements for residential land within the study area. A primary conclusion of the study is that at least 2,000 additional dwelling units will be required over the next 20 years at current rates of growth.

To accommodate long term population growth in Pemberton and Area C, the Subregional Planning Study concludes that the Pemberton Benchlands and infill development in the Village of Pemberton can accommodate up to 1000 future housing units. However, if the community chooses to accommodate population growth at rates comparable to those experienced over the past 20 years, additional developable land will be required. Floodplain, the Agricultural Land Reserve, and steep terrain limit options for expansion of the Village of Pemberton into areas adjacent to the Village boundary. The option of developing a new growth area in conjunction with other planning initiatives, such as policies to support the intensification of the existing village area, was explored.

The long term growth option recommended by the Subregional Planning study includes the development of the Benchlands and Pemberton infill, plus the development of a new growth area south of Mosquito Lake (approximately 400 hectares of land. including portions of the Lil’wat Nation transfer lands, the “Ravenscrest”, and “Sabre/Biro” lands). Densities equivalent to those included in the Pemberton Benchlands area (5.25 units per hectare) could be allocated in several ways to include a broad range of housing types from some acreage type lots to apartments. This would be serviced with a full range of urban infrastructure (water, sewer, etc.). Total yield would be up to 2,125 dwelling units. At a density of 6.6 dwellings/ha total yield would be 2,670 dwelling units. This option was explored to show the potential impact on long term supply that might come from higher density.

These potential future development lands have been designated in the RGS mapping as “Future Growth Node” and are designated as “Special Planning Area” in this OCP. Comprehensive planning is needed to establish development parameters for desired density, servicing, public land requirements, governance, and phasing sequence that recognize the significant development potential within the Special Planning Area.

Objectives

To establish a land use designation which identifies areas which have the potential to be developed within the next 5 years. To provide flexibility in establishing a land use mix provided all proposals are consistent with the provisions of the Official Community Plan. To encourage strong linkages with the existing population base in the Village of Pemberton To encourage innovative planning that results in mixed use development, protection of open spaces, a variety of transportation options, and infrastructure servicing efficiencies. To plan for an overall scale of development that will accommodate the long term growth needs of the Pemberton area. To ensure the planning, design, and construction of energy efficient neighbourhoods and buildings to minimize greenhouse gas emissions, maximize energy conservation and improve air and water quality.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200915 Page 26 of 323 Policies

5.1. Areas designated as Special Planning Area are outlined on Map 1 – Land Use Designations. 5.2. In order for any development to occur on land designated as Special Planning Area, an application to amend the Official Community Plan by redesignating the parcel to an appropriate new OCP designation must be approved. A development plan shall accompany each application and the development plan must address the key issues associated with the land. The development plan will be prepared based on the criteria outlined in Sections 5.4 through 5.19 of this Plan. 5.3. Uses permitted in areas designated Special Planning Area are residential on existing parcels.

Criteria for a Future Comprehensive Development Designation

The future character of the new community will be determined in a comprehensive development planning process which will involve an amendment to this plan. The goal will be to create a community of neighbourhoods built around the following planning principles:

5.4. the development should reflect the Smart Growth and sustainability principles in the Regional Growth Strategy 5.5. provide for an enhanced non-motorized recreation trail network and pedestrian pathways that form the backbone of the community and that involve no net loss of existing trails 5.6. provide for a variety of types and a significant amount of open space and parkland, including provision for retaining the shorelands around Mosquito Lake as park 5.7. provide for a variety of housing types, affordable housing options and densities in compact, pedestrian friendly neighbourhoods and include at least one community oriented commercial development. Consider zoning that establishes minimum as well as maximum permitted densities. 5.8. higher densities will be accommodated on sites that minimize impacts on environmentally sensitive areas, areas of cultural or archeological value, viewscapes and are in proximity to major roads. 5.9. protect ecologically sensitive areas and key natural features within a comprehensive open space system that focuses development in less sensitive areas in a way that minimizes negative impacts on fish habitat and water quality, sensitive wetlands and their riparian zones; wildlife habitats; and environmentally sensitive old growth forest areas; 5.10. provide for community facilities such as school, fire hall, and recreation facilities to meet the social and cultural needs of the community; 5.11. consult, cooperate and coordinate with the Lil’wat First Nation in planning for (and management of) development of lands acquired in the planning area and addressing issues of mutual interest; 5.12. plan and design for efficient and effective transit service; 5.13. require provision of commercial services that serve the needs of the resident population;

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200916 Page 27 of 323 5.14. design and prove the viability of infrastructure to meet the long-term population requirements of the community and which minimizes impacts to the natural environment. 5.15. A high standard of energy efficiency for all new construction is encouraged: a. Energy efficiency objectives shall be incorporated into all zoning amendment bylaws; b. Density bonusing may be considered where alternative energy systems or other innovative sustainability initiatives are proposed.

Servicing and Development Analysis

5.16. The plan amendment process should include a detailed analysis of site constraints and opportunities. This analysis should also address Lil’wat cultural sites. The analysis will have to be detailed enough to inform the servicing review. 5.17. Prior to development proceeding, a comprehensive servicing analysis must be undertaken to determine how the new growth area can best be economically serviced with utility infrastructure. The servicing analysis should include recommendations regarding best environmental practices and an analysis that addresses the economic implications of capital funding, development timing and rates, risk and in particular, the staging of services under various growth scenarios. The servicing analysis should also include an assessment of the feasibility of providing the Ivey Lake – Reid Road rural residential subdivision with community water as part of the comprehensive development. 5.18. Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Subdivision and Development Servicing (Planned Communities) Bylaw No. 741 or Village of Pemberton subdivision servicing bylaw, as applicable, should be amended to include the subject area at the time of consideration of a development application. Community services and infrastructure would then be required to meet basic municipal servicing standards, except where specifically varied by Development Variance Permit. Variances to specific standards will be considered where the variances result in reduced environmental or visual impacts, while still providing a suitable level of service. 5.19. Prior to adoption of a rezoning bylaw to permit subdivision or development, owners must verify that adequate water supply is available, and submit water, sanitary sewer and stormwater sewer master plans in accordance with SLRD Servicing Bylaw 741 or Village of Pemberton Servicing Bylaw.

Governance

5.20. It is acknowledged that where the comprehensive servicing analysis demonstrates the feasibility of urban density and scale development in the Special Planning Area, the land to be developed will be included at an appropriate time within a municipality. 5.21. The planning process for the Special Planning Area should be undertaken as a collaborative effort by the Village of Pemberton, the SLRD, Lil’wat Nation, landowners and the community in ongoing consultation with the Agricultural Land Commission and other affected agencies. This planning process will be guided by the objectives and policies of this plan, the policies of the Village with respect to smart growth, densities, timing, rate of development, and the values and economic aspirations of the Lil’wat Nation.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200917 Page 28 of 323 6. AGRICULTURE

Context

Agriculture is the dominant land use within a large portion of the plan area. The Pemberton Valley is world renowned for its seed potato industry, supplying seedlings internationally. Agricultural activity in the area also includes beef cattle production, the production of hay, oats, and other fodder, as well as fruit and vegetables, an emerging equestrian sector and agritourism activities.

Most of the productive agricultural land in the plan area falls within the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR). The ‘Agriculture’ land use designation on Map 1 generally corresponds with the ALR boundaries. Land within the ALR is regulated by the government of British Columbia through the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC). The purpose of the ALC is first and foremost to preserve agricultural land in the province and encourage the establishment and maintenance of farms. Not all farms are located within the Agriculture land use designation or the Agricultural Land Reserve; these farms are nevertheless of value to the local agricultural industry.

In 2002, the Agricultural Land Reserve Use, Subdivision and Procedure Regulation (B.C. Reg. 171/2002) expanded the scope of designated farm uses to include activities such as equestrian facilities, agritourism (other than accommodation), direct farm marketing, wineries and cideries (including food and beverage service), kennels and pet boarding facilities, unpaved helipads and airstrips. SLRD bylaws may regulate some of these uses, but cannot prohibit them. The Board supports, in principle, economic diversification initiatives accessory to and compatible with farming that add value to locally produced farm products.

The policies contained in this section of the OCP are intended to confirm support for the farming community by the Regional District and support preservation of the agricultural land base. The OCP provides guidance for land use decisions. Future decisions to amend the zoning bylaw, draft other bylaws, or approve developments must be consistent with the OCP.

An OCP is required to document the amount and type of land, present and proposed, to be set aside for agriculture. The OCP may also contain policies respecting the maintenance and enhancement of farming, addressing topics such as water supply, recreation near farm land, support for the agriculture industry, and safeguarding the ALR. Development permit areas may be designated to establish guidelines for urban development adjacent to the ALR. An OCP may not prohibit farm uses that are permitted through the Agricultural Land Commission Act and regulations, or provide prescriptive land uses to control agricultural operations.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200918 Page 29 of 323 Objectives

To preserve the agricultural land base in the plan area. To encourage diversification and economic sustainability of the farming community. To minimize the impacts from non-agricultural development occurring at the edge of farming areas and within agricultural lands. To accommodate housing that meets the needs of farmers and minimizes impacts on farm land. To balance the interests of agriculture and protection of the environment. To contribute to local and regional food security.

Policies

Agricultural Land Base (Land Use)

6.1. Agriculture is recognized and supported as the primary land use in the ALR. 6.2. Lands set aside for agricultural activities are indicated on Map 1 – Land Use designations as Agriculture. 6.3. Land designated as Agriculture is intended for agricultural uses. Agricultural uses include the growing, rearing, producing, and harvesting of agricultural products, the sale of agricultural products, and agri-tourism activities. 6.4. All uses and subdivision of land within the Agricultural Land Reserve shall be in accordance with the Agricultural Land Commission Act and associated regulations. 6.5. Rural, non-farm residential, and urban developments are encouraged to occur in locations that will not impact the viability of farm land. 6.6. Alternative non-agricultural sites should be considered when recreational, institutional, industrial, commercial uses or utility facilities are proposed for agricultural areas. 6.7. Exclusions from the Agricultural Land Reserve and further subdivision of lots within the Agricultural Land Reserve are generally not supported. 6.8. Unpaved helipads and airstrips will be discouraged on agricultural lands. 6.9. In order to limit the fragmentation of multi-parcel farm operations by the sale of individual parcels, the SLRD will work collaboratively with farm property owners and their agents, the ALC, and the Agricultural Advisory Committee on a case by case basis to reconcile potentially conflicting interests. 6.10. The owners of agricultural lands are encouraged to facilitate the use of the land for agriculture by actively farming or leasing or loaning their lands to persons that would undertake active farming. 6.11. Non farm uses on agricultural land, or non-soil dependent farm operations, are encouraged to locate in areas of poorer soils.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200919 Page 30 of 323 Economic Sustainability

6.12. The Regional District encourages economic diversification initiatives accessory to and compatible with farming that add value to locally produced farm products by: a. Supporting the development of farmers outlets for the sale of local agricultural products; b. Permitting roadside stands for farm gate sales of agricultural products; c. Permitting bed and breakfasts in agricultural areas and guest houses/small scale agritourism operations that feature farm vacations and farming related activities that provide opportunities for guests to experience agricultural activity; and, d. Support home occupations that produce value added products from locally produced agricultural products. 6.13. Agri-tourism accommodation to a maximum of 10 sleeping units per farm operation will be considered to be consistent with the Agriculture land use designation. Applications for agri-tourism accommodation will be considered on a site specific rezoning basis. 6.14. The Regional District recognizes existing home-based businesses within the Agriculture land use designation and supports the establishment of additional home-based businesses, including bed and breakfast establishments. 6.15. The operation of home-based businesses within the Agriculture land use designation shall: a. Be secondary to the residential/farm use of the property; b. Be located fully within a residential building and or accessory building; c. Involve only residents of the dwelling associated with the home occupation plus a maximum of two additional persons; d. Obtain approval and, where necessary, permitting from the Coast-Garibaldi Health Unit for businesses involving food intended for human consumption. 6.16. Farm retail sales shall be subject to the following: a) all of the farm product offered for sale is produced on the farm on which the retail sales are taking place, or b) at least 50% of the retail sales area is limited to the sale of farm products produced on the farm on which the retail sales are taking place and the total area, both indoors and outdoors, used for the retail sales of all products does not exceed 300 m2 6.17. Bed and breakfast establishments within the Agriculture land use designation are limited to one per legal parcel and shall be: a. Fully contained within a dwelling which is owner occupied; b. Restricted to a maximum of five guest bedrooms (or the maximum permitted by the ALC); c. Required to provide one additional parking space per bedroom; and, d. Approved by the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200920 Page 31 of 323 6.18. The significance of horses, horse related activities and the horse industry in the Pemberton Valley are recognized. Pemberton is home to a large horse population that provides significant economic as well as recreational benefits to the community. As horse operations are recognized as a bona fide farming operation and are designated as ‘farm use’ under the ALC Act, the SLRD will support and encourage the horse industry in Area C.

Urban-Agriculture Interface

6.19. Normal farm practices with possible undesirable side effects, such as odours, machinery and animal noises, and blowing dust, are to be expected in an agricultural area. In the case of conflict between a farm operation carrying on normal farm practices and adjacent non-farm development, the agricultural interest will be supported. 6.20. Along the non-farm side of the agriculture/residential development boundary, covenants should be registered on newly created residential parcels at the time of subdivision to retain or establish a vegetated buffer of 15-meter width for visual screening and to prevent trespass onto farms. A further setback of 15 meters should be achieved on new lots through building setbacks or open space dedication. 6.21. The SLRD will request that the approving officer give consideration to the registration of a covenant on title of new parcels created in non-Agricultural land use designations within 300 m of the ALR advising of possible nuisances from normal farm activities. 6.22. Subdivisions at the edge of farm land should be self-contained and not have a road layout that might promote further development pressure on the farm land, for example, road ends stopping at the ALR boundary. 6.23. Where areas between the ALR and the edge of the valley are designated Rural Residential or Special Planning Area under Parts 5 and 16 of this plan, phasing of development shall proceed with a view to making use only of existing approved roads across the ALR rather than applying for Agricultural Land Commission approval of new ones. 6.24. Ensure that future development activities in the plan area result in the minimal creation of new residential-agriculture interfaces. 6.25. Agricultural Impact Assessments should be considered to measure the impacts of a proposed major rezoning, subdivision or non-farm use on the ALR or farmed lands. Mitigation should be required for identified impacts. An agricultural impact assessment prepared by a qualified professional should address the following: a. Loss of ALR land and existing agricultural use, and consequential impacts on existing farm operations as a result of the development proposal; b. Severance or separation of ALR lands and areas of existing agricultural use from the main body of the ALR, or from the main portion of operating farms; c. Loss or alteration of access to ALR lands and existing agricultural use; d. Disturbance of drainage and aquifers affecting ALR lands and existing agricultural use; e. Disturbance of on-farm irrigation systems or other utilities;

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200921 Page 32 of 323 f. Disturbance of fencing and other works used for livestock control and property security; g. Increased noise near noise-sensitive agricultural operations; h. Increased public access and consequential problems (e.g. littering, vandalism, theft, interference with livestock etc.); i. Disturbance of existing livestock and machinery movements, either on-farm or between farm properties.

Housing

6.26. Additional farm houses are permitted where necessary for farm use or retired farmers, as permitted in Agricultural Land Commission legislation, regulations, and/or policies. 6.27. To allow farmers the opportunity to provide additional housing for farm help where a bona fide need has been demonstrated, applications for dwellings for additional farm help will be considered at the building permit stage based on the following: a. The property has farm classification under the Assessment Act; b. Supportive comments from the Regional Agrologist with the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands have been received; and, c. Supportive comments from the Area C Agricultural Advisory Committee have been received. 6.28. The Regional District shall consider amending the Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765 to: a. Establish conditions relating to siting of and access to dwellings on ALR land to maintain options for efficient agricultural use of the land. b. Regulate the siting of driveways/access to parcels in the AGR land use designation. c. Replace the floor area cap on residential buildings with a ‘farm home plate’ regulation. 6.29. In order to limit the fragmentation of farmland by dwellings and the associated development, the SLRD shall work collaboratively with farm property owners and their agents, and the Agricultural Advisory Committee on a case by case basis to reconcile potentially conflicting interests. The use of maximum setbacks, or provision for a larger dwelling if the dwelling is located closer to a parcel line are examples of approaches that should be considered.

Environmental Protection

6.30. Support initiatives that sustain both farming and wildlife, protect against soil erosion and degradation, and maintain water quality and hydrological functions on agricultural land 6.31. Recognize and protect environmentally significant areas of farmland, including wetlands, abandoned watercourses and other sensitive areas.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200922 Page 33 of 323 6.32. Minimize the negative impacts on farming and wildlife habitat when new agri-tourism, transportation and utility corridors, regional recreational opportunities and other economic initiatives are being developed. 6.33. Encourage farmers to prepare Environmental Farm Plans. 6.34. Encourage other levels of government and non-government agencies to support farmers in their habitat protection and enhancement initiatives on agricultural land in cooperation with farmers. 6.35. To promote the long term sustainability of agricultural production, ecosystem integrity, and human health, land use decision making shall apply the precautionary principle: When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically, and in this context, the proponent of an activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof.

Recreation

6.36. Individual farmers, the Agricultural Advisory Committee, the Pemberton Valley Trails Association, the ALC, and other stakeholders shall be consulted on recreational trail plans, designs, and trail management to ensure farm operations are not adversely affected. 6.37. The Regional District, in consultation with the Agricultural Land Commission, the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Advisory Committee, Pemberton Valley Trails Association and other stakeholders will continue to work to identify and mitigate potential conflict areas between trail users and adjoining farm operations, and work with landowners and stakeholders to mitigate the negative effects of increased public access on farm operations. Where appropriate, the provision of signage, litter bins at critical areas, fencing or other impact mitigation as appropriate will be encouraged.

Other

6.38. The Regional District shall consider amending the Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765 to consolidate the ‘Pemberton Fringe’ subzone with the Agriculture land use designation. 6.39. The Regional District shall consider amending the Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765 to more clearly reflect the broader range of permitted farm uses and to incorporate, where appropriate, regulations intended to minimize impacts on existing and adjacent farm operations. 6.40. The SLRD will work with the Agricultural Advisory Committee, Agricultural Land Commission, Regional Agrologist and the local farming community to determine the need for regulation of any of the designated farm uses in the Agricultural Land Reserve Use, Subdivision, and Procedure Regulation through the development of a farm bylaw.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200923 Page 34 of 323 7. COMMERCIAL LANDS

Context

The Village of Pemberton is recognized as the established business and service centre. The inhabitants of Area C provide much needed support to the Pemberton business community. Commercial activity outside of downtown Pemberton is limited to a small commercial centre at Mount Currie, and a number of commercial recreational developments, including Birkenhead Resort, Anderson Lake Resort, Whispering Falls Resort and Lillooet Lake Lodge. In addition, there exists a wide range of various, more informal, commercial enterprises operating out of private residences through out the plan area.

The Mount Currie commercial area is relatively small in area with a mixture of activity that generally caters to the travelling public. Services include a couple of restaurants and a motel, a hair salon, art gallery, gas station, log home building business. There may be some room for modest expansion of commercial activity or redevelopment of existing sites; however, it is contained by several large Indian Reserves and Agricultural Land Reserve boundaries. Businesses in Mount Currie have to compete with their counterparts in the Village of Pemberton.

The establishment of a viable commercial centre in Mount Currie is a goal of this Community Plan and is supported by policies contained in this Plan document. There exists a desire to create an identity for the Mount Currie commercial area which reflects a small town service centre which falls within the context of a surrounding Lil’wat Nation.

Residents in the central and northern portions of the Mount Currie /D’Arcy Corridor are generally not well served by the commercial community. While a store/gas station at Anderson Lake Resort formerly served some everyday shopping needs of residents of D’Arcy and Devine, currently the closest commercial service for these residents is the store at Birkenhead Resort.

The Regional District recognizes the demand for backcountry commercial recreation, and the business opportunities that backcountry recreation presents.

With respect to commercial land supply, there is some availability of commercial land in the Village of Pemberton but there will be some shortfall in the 20-year time frame. This commercial requirement is driven by growth in the resident population and by other forces such as tourism. The 20-year shortfall has been assumed to be on the order of 20 ha after development of the existing inventory in Pemberton.

Options for new development include higher densities and/or redevelopment in Pemberton or new development in other locations such as at the old Mt. Currie village on the highway, in conjunction with continued development at the upper Mt. Currie village to serve the resident population, in conjunction with a potential new growth, again to serve the resident population, and at various locations along the corridor to serve residents and tourists.

Objectives

To support the viability of the Village of Pemberton’s down town core.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200924 Page 35 of 323 To ensure adequate goods and services are locally available to residents of and visitors to Area C. To encourage the location of urban development forms, such as intensive forms of commercial/industrial activity, within the Village of Pemberton’s core area. To ensure the planning, design, and construction of energy efficient buildings to minimize greenhouse gas emissions, maximize energy conservation and improve air and water quality.

Policies

7.1. The Plan recognizes existing commercial activity and designates these land uses as COMMERCIAL on Map 1 – Land Use Designations. COMMERCIAL use includes the use of land for local commercial activity including retail as well as uses that cater to the traveling public, such as restaurants and tourist accommodations. 7.2. Tourism Commercial businesses that do not conflict with existing land uses, or cause unacceptable environmental or social impacts are encouraged within the Plan Area. 7.3. Outside of the commercial recreation buffer, the Regional District encourages backcountry commercial operations that do not impede existing public recreation uses of public land, and practice good environmental stewardship. 7.4. Backcountry commercial recreation and tourism staging areas that do not conflict with existing land uses or cause unacceptable environmental or social impacts will be accommodated on a site specific rezoning basis and will not require an amendment to the plan 7.5. Developers of commercial properties are encouraged to avoid uses or character that suggests ‘strip’ development or that detract from the overall quality of the commercial area. 7.6. The Regional District supports commercial activity in the Mount Currie area which caters to the everyday needs of local residents and provides services and goods to area visitors. 7.7. In order to encourage more complete communities, the Plan recognizes the need for additional commercial activity in Birken/D’Arcy corridor, particularly to service the everyday needs of area residents and to provide goods and services for the traveling public. Additional commercial sites have not been designated COMMERCIAL on the Land Use Plan, however, suitable sites within the corridor will be supported. An amendment to the Electoral Area C Official Community Plan would be required. 7.8. A high standard of energy efficiency for all new commercial construction is encouraged: a. Energy efficiency objectives shall be incorporated into all zoning amendment bylaws; b. Density bonusing shall be considered where alternative energy systems or other innovative sustainability initiatives are proposed.

Mount Currie - D’Arcy Corridor

7.9. The Regional District supports the development of a railway station and tourist service center in D’Arcy, including tourist accommodation and limited commercial, on a site specific rezoning basis.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200925 Page 36 of 323 7.10. The need for additional commercial activity in the Mount Currie - D’Arcy corridor, particularly to service the everyday needs of area residents and to provide goods and services for the traveling public, is recognized. Suitable sites within the corridor will be supported through an amendment to the Electoral Area C Official Community Plan.

Development Permit Area 1: Mount Currie Commercial

7.11. Pursuant to Section 919.1(a) of the Local Government Act, Development Permit Area 1 is designated as a development permit area for Establishing the form and character of commercial development. Development Permit Area 1 includes the all parcels designated as Commercial in Mount Currie, as identified on Map 1. The following guidelines shall apply to new development or redevelopment of properties within Development Permit Area 1: a. Wherever possible, parking lots that are designed to accommodate space for more than 10 vehicles should be located to the rear of the commercial building; b. The construction of sidewalks for the entire frontage of the commercial property is encouraged; c. The use of natural building materials is encouraged, such as the use of logs, wood and brick; and, d. No free-standing signs are permitted.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200926 Page 37 of 323 8. INDUSTRIAL LANDS

Context

The majority of the industrial land in the Pemberton and Electoral Area C area is located in Pemberton’s industrial park, totalling approximately 33 hectares. Lands zoned for industrial use in Electoral Area C total approximately 23 ha. Resource industrial activity is also occurring south of Pemberton, along the Whistler/Pemberton corridor in the Rutherford area. Industrial land in this area includes the Highway 99 Rutherford Pit (approximately 18 ha), the Durfeld Log sort (approximately 42 ha) and the Rutherford Power Plant (approximately 2 ha), totalling approximately 63 ha.

There are several gravel extraction sites and mineral claims located within the plan area, specifically within the Whistler-Pemberton Corridor and Mount Currie-D’Arcy Corridor. The mineral tenure holders have the right to access, explore and develop any mineral resource that is discovered on these tenures. Gravel extraction operations, including lease terms and reclamation plans, are regulated by the Ministry of Energy and Mines.

The Pemberton and Area Sub-Regional Land Use Planning Study indicated that “considering the amount of industrial land relative to projected population, it is estimated that there is a demand for 22 ha of industrial by 2011, 40 ha by 2016 and 67 ha by 2026. While it is assumed that industrial lands in Electoral Area C are fully developed, in Pemberton, approximately 88% of the industrial land (29 ha) is currently undeveloped. This indicates that existing industrial areas will likely accommodate some short-term demand, but will be insufficient over the long-term.”

Historically lands within Electoral Area C have not been designated as Industrial. Industrial development has been directed to the Pemberton Industrial Park. However, to accommodate the demand for larger format, resource-based industrial activities in Area C, industrial use have been permitted in several locations. This version of the OCP reflects those industrial uses with appropriate land use designations, including a new Industrial designation at Rutherford Creek. In general however, the aim of maintaining the rural character of Area C is paramount. Industrial uses that include such activities as warehousing, processing, and manufacturing continue to be directed to the Pemberton Industrial Park.

Objective

To promote the efficient use of industrial lands. To support the use of the Pemberton Industrial park. To provide for longer term industrial growth

Policies

8.1. Most new industrial development will continue to be directed to the Village of Pemberton. Industry oriented toward the natural resources sector and industrial uses requiring larger areas of land than available in the Pemberton Industrial Park will be considered on a site specific rezoning basis in the area at Rutherford Creek designated Industrial on Map 1.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200927 Page 38 of 323 8.2. Existing quasi-industrial land uses that operate as home industries are recognized. Further development of home industries of this kind may be supported on a site specific basis in accordance with the home industry policy of this plan. 8.3. Redesignation of lands to Industrial may be considered where there is a clear benefit to the community, the land is separated from residential uses, and the activities will not negatively impact the aesthetics of the community. The local processing of wood products, in particular is supported. 8.4. Applications for industrial development shall be accompanied by a proposal and concept plan addressing such matters as environmental protection, landscaping, buffering, access, servicing, reclamation, and any other matters deemed necessary by the Regional District.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200928 Page 39 of 323 9. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LANDS

Context

The Resource Management designation and policies are intended to inform the orderly development of the community and provide information for informed responses to referrals. Much of the land designated as Resource Management in Area C is Crown land, which is governed by provincial and federal governments as well as the OCP and the zoning bylaw. The intent of the policies here is to complement existing resource management plans. Recreation, tourism, forest management, wildlife management, and mining are governed by the LRMP, as well as resource specific management plans from the various government agencies and operators. The Lil’wat Land Use Plan, which was released in the fall of 2006, provides another layer of information with which to shape future resource management in Area C.

The Lil’wat Nation Land Use Plan provides a vision for managing Lil’wat Territory. The Province, though a stakeholder-based process, developed the Draft Sea-to-Sky Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP). The Lil’wat Nation and the Province have reached an agreement on land use planning through a government to government process that harmonizes the Lil’wat Land Use Plan with the Sea-to-Sky LRMP. The final LRMP reflects the Agreement between the Province and Lil’wat.

The Sea to Sky LRMP designates areas within Area C as All Resource Uses Permitted Zones, Wildland (Mining/Tourism Permitted) Zones, and Protected Areas. The All Resource Uses Permitted Zones include two specific sub areas: Front country Areas and Cultural Management Areas. Wildland (Mining/Tourism Permitted) Zones will emphasize cultural, recreational, tourism, or wildlife values depending on the individual zone. While mining and tourism activities are permitted in this zone, commercial timber harvesting and independent power projects (IPPs) are not allowed. Protected Areas include both existing parks and eight new conservancies.

Much of the plan area falls within the Soo Timber Supply Area (TSA) administered by the Squamish Forest District of the Ministry of Forests and Range. There are numerous natural resources associated with the Soo TSA including outdoor recreation, forest products, community water supplies and botanical forest products.

BC Hydro is another agency that significantly shapes the use of Resource Management Lands within the SLRD. BC Hydro is working to implement the Province’s Energy Plan, which has defined a target of fifty per cent ‘clean energy’ achieved by 2013. Clean Energy is defined as energy from alternative energy technologies that result in a net environmental improvement relative to existing energy production, including hydro, wind, solar, photovoltaic, geothermal, tidal, wave and biomass energy, as well as cogeneration from heat and power, energy from landfill gas and municipal solid waste.

The SLRD in general and Electoral Area C in particular, are strategically positioned to take advantage of opportunities presented by emerging technologies and opportunities for clean energy, such as small scale hydro electric generation facilities and geothermal energy production. The SLRD believes that where it is compatible with other community values is desirable to accommodate such energy projects under the Resource Management designation. However, it is also recognized that much of Areas C is highly impacted by transmission lines and other

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200929 Page 40 of 323 infrastructure. Given the high value placed on the rural character and the tourism economy, these impacts need to be addressed in the planning stages of energy development within Area C.

Objectives

To promote the appropriate management of mineral, forest, and agricultural resources that is compatible with existing uses and respects the social and environmental values of the community.

To ensure that specific Crown land areas and values of key concern to local governments are known to statutory decision-makers within provincial government agencies and corporations.

To provide a higher standard of communication and referrals within Community Crown Land Interface (CCLI) areas to ensure an appropriate level of care that will address community health, safety, and stability.

To promote the allocation, use, and management of Crown land and water resources in a manner that, to the greatest practicable extent, positively addresses community needs and interests.

Policies

9.1. Sustainable natural resource use compatible with the aesthetic and environmental values of the community is encouraged on lands designated as Resource Management, as indicated on Map 1 – Land Use Designations. 9.2. Permitted uses on Resource Management lands are residential, agriculture, resource extraction, silviculture, dispersed outdoor recreation, and ancillary uses related to these activities. 9.3. In all Resource Management areas of the plan, the minimum parcel area shall be forty hectares. 9.4. The development of small hydroelectric facilities is considered to be consistent with the Resource Management land designation where they are shown to be compatible with adjacent land uses, technically sound, environmentally responsible, socially responsible, and licensable. 9.5. The SLRD supports and encourages preparation of the visual management strategy to establish visual quality objectives for the Front country (CCLI area) and within established scenic areas outside the Front country (eg. Lillooet River corridor and viewpoints from Lil’wat Nation communities) recommended as an implementation measure in the Sea to Sky LRMP. 9.6. Ministry of Energy, Mines, and Petroleum Resources, the Ministry of Forests and Range, and licensees are encouraged to ensure that resource extraction within or near the community creates minimal disturbance relating to noise, dust, visual impacts and industrial traffic. 9.7. Industrial uses that have strong linkages to resource activities such as forestry and that are primarily conducted outdoors, require a land area of one hectare or more, and may be

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200930 Page 41 of 323 incompatible with settlement uses or industry located within the Village of Pemberton or the Resort Municipality of Whistler boundaries, may be permitted on a site specific rezoning basis in lands designated as Resource Management. 9.8. The Regional District actively discourages B.C. Hydro and the British Columbia Transmission Corporation to allow the construction of transmission lines within the Pemberton Valley and further usage of the Whistler - Pemberton Corridor for major transmission lines. 9.9. Small scale commercial facilities for back country recreation, including campgrounds, public or commercial backcountry huts, and extensive recreation shall be considered consistent with the Resource Management land use designation. 9.10. The Ministry of Energy, Mines, and Petroleum Resources is encouraged to carry out a study of the cumulative effects of independent power projects in Area C and develop a regional energy plan. Community Crown Land Interface 9.11. Community – Crown Land Interface (CCLI) areas on Map 8b – Old Growth Forests are intended to provide guidance to provincial corporations and ministries when their decision-making involves land and resources that are integrally important to nearby communities. The intention for CCLI areas is to: a) clearly identify interface areas of concern for local government; and b) define objectives reflecting local government interests in those Crown land areas. CCLI areas indicated on Map 8b delineate areas where a higher level of care is required to ensure community health, safety, and stability. The regional district will continue to advocate for a framework for enhanced consultation, coordination and collaboration between levels of government that would help achieve the “higher level of care”. 9.12. The SLRD will advocate for collaborative planning and decision making with provincial land management and tenure granting agencies to ensure that operational plans, prescriptions, permits and tenures contain provisions that will minimize adverse effects of resource development or use on adjacent communities (e.g. risk of flooding, debris flow, landslide, or erosion on downstream settlement areas, deteriorated water quality in domestic water supplies, deteriorated visual quality, noise effects from motorized activity). 9.13. The disposition of Crown land for residential, commercial or industrial development shall be directed to locations that are consistent with the policies and designations of this plan and the regional growth strategy.. 9.14. The SLRD will work with the province to identify and make possible the siting of municipal/regional infrastructure on Crown land to serve community and economic development needs throughout the plan area, where such infrastructure can appropriately co-exist with other resource and environmental values. 9.15. The SLRD will encourage the province to consult the SLRD and Village of Pemberton or Resort Municipality of Whistler, as appropriate, with the objective of understanding and accommodating their interest in water supply protection when considering any resource use, management, development, or activities that may affect community water supplies.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200931 Page 42 of 323 10. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA

Context

Under the Forests and Range Practices Act, the Ministry of Environment may authorize the designation of an area of land as a community watershed. The watershed designation allows for the establishment of water quality objectives and the need for particular forest practices that are intended to prevent long-term change to background water quality, quantity and timing of flow. Within Area C, there are seven provincially designated Community Watersheds.

Objective

To recognize the importance of water resources and protect and improve the quality and quantity of those resources for future generations. To ensure development activities in the Upper Bridge River Valley support the protection of community watersheds.

Policies

10.1. The Community Watershed Protection Areas, as indicated on Map 1, includes existing, formally designated community watersheds as well as areas identified in local resource use plans where the primary land management priority is to maintain local water quality. 10.2. Permitted uses within Community Watershed Protection Areas are dispersed outdoor recreation and auxiliary uses related to these activities. 10.3. Intensive recreation, subdivision and rezoning of lands within Community Watershed Protection Areas shall be discouraged. Recreationalists are encouraged to minimize stream crossings and stay on existing trails to prevent erosion. 10.4. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range to ensure that forest management practices are designed to ensure that any practices within Community Watersheds do not impact water quality.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200932 Page 43 of 323 11. PUBLIC LANDS &FACILITIES

Context

The majority of public facilities for Area C and Village residents are provided within the Village of Pemberton. Public facilities include schools, recreational facilities, health and library services. Given the rural character of the plan area, particularly the dispersed population, it is likely that the majority of public uses will continue to be provided within the boundaries of the Village of Pemberton.

Given the rural character of the plan area, residents are offered few, formal community facilities beyond those offered within the Village of Pemberton. Existing facilities include the Birken Schoolhouse and the Pemberton Community Centre. The Birken Schoolhouse is an old one-room school located near Gates Lake. This facility and its grounds are well used for community gatherings and is a valuable resource. The Pemberton Community Centre will be relocated from its present site in Area C on Pemberton Meadows Road to a new recreation and community facility in the Village of Pemberton. . School facilities serving Area C include the Signal Hill Elementary and Pemberton Secondary School, both of which are within the Village of Pemberton. The Blackwater Creek Elementary School in Devine serves the Birken – D’Arcy area.

Objective

To support the preservation and development of lands for institutional use. To promote the health and safety of residents and visitors by encouraging the improvement of medical services and fire and police protection capability. To foster cooperation among all agencies involved in planning and land use in the area.

Policies

11.1. Lands set aside for public and institutional development, such as hospitals, community halls, open space, recreation and playground facilities, and public utility buildings, are indicated on Map 1 as Institutional. 11.2. Generally, public uses are supported in all land use designations except for lands designated as Agriculture. 11.3. The Regional District shall strive to ensure that land is made available for community and fire protection facilities. 11.4. The Regional District recognizes the statutory responsibilities of Federal and Provincial Government ministries and will work with these agencies to facilitate the provision of services, including health care, policing, and road maintenance. 11.5. The Regional District shall work with the Village of Pemberton, Lil’wat Nation and community organizations to determine the community and recreational facilities needed by area residents and to determine possible funding sources. 11.6. The Regional District shall continue to work with the Village of Pemberton and relevant senior government agencies to encourage the provision and maintenance of appropriate police, ambulance, fire, health and library facilities which can be accessed by plan area residents.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200933 Page 44 of 323 11.7. The Regional District encourages School District No. 48 to permit the use of existing and future school facilities for recreational and community purposes. 11.8. The Regional District may support post secondary education institutions and private education facilities on a site specific rezoning basis.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200934 Page 45 of 323 12. PARKS

Context

The Regional District’s park function consists of collecting funds and taking ownership of land through the park dedication process at the time of subdivision. No regional parks have yet been established. Area C residents access park facilities within the Village of Pemberton or amenities provided by the Province through the provincial parks system or the BC Forest Service recreation program. Nairn Falls, Birkenhead Lake, Joffre Lakes and Garibaldi Provincial Parks are well used by visitors and residents.

The Ministry Of Tourism, Sports and the Arts provides recreational opportunities through the Mosquito Lake, Owl Creek, and Spetch Creek Recreation Sites in the Mt. Currie – D’Arcy corridor; the Strawberry Point, Twin One Creek, Lizzie Bay and Driftwood Bay Recreation Sites at Lillooet Lake; Meager Creek Hotsprings, Upper Lillooet River and Tenquille Lake sites in the upper Lillooet River valley. Heritage Park, a small, waterfront park in D’Arcy is leased from BC Rail and maintained by an independent society. The Regional District leases land from BC Rail to provide parking for park users and boat trailers.

In 2002 the Regional District and the Pemberton Valley Trails Association applied to the Provincial government to designate a small parcel of Crown land on the north side of the Lillooet River as a provincial park (shown on Map 3 - Recreation). The site is a well-used component of the Pemberton valley recreation trail network. The proposed park, called the Riverside Nature Park, was rejected due to a lack of legal access. Negotiations continue with BC Rail to provide access to the site.

Objectives

To satisfy the recreation needs of residents and visitors by ensuring that land is provided for community parks and recreation areas and by encouraging effective management.

Policies

12.1. Lands set aside for parks and recreation are indicated on Map 1 as Park. Permitted uses include dispersed recreation and auxiliary uses unless otherwise prohibited, and other uses permitted by provincial legislation. 12.2. The Regional District supports the development of a Parks and Recreation Master Plan for Area C to determine the type of parks and recreation facilities required, the best location for these facilities, and the means of acquiring them. 12.3. The Regional District supports the efforts of the Provincial Government in the provision of park and recreational opportunities within the plan area. 12.4. The Regional District will continue to encourage the Ministry of Tourism, Sports and the Arts to maintain and improve existing provincial recreation sites and to restore access to the Lizzie Lake site. 12.5. The Regional District shall continue to work with the Village of Pemberton, Lil’wat Nation, provincial agencies, local community groups, land owners, and others as appropriate in the identification and development of parks and recreational access.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200935 Page 46 of 323 12.6. Where possible, the Regional District supports the establishment of community parks at water front locations to maximize public access to water resources. 12.7. Where possible, at the time of subdivision parks and trails will be dedicated rather than cash-in-lieu. 12.8. The Regional District shall continue to work toward formal dedication of the Riverside Nature Park, as shown on Map 5.1.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200936 Page 47 of 323 SERVICES &INFRASTRUCTURE

13. UTILITIES AND SERVICES

Context

The community of Devine and an area north of the Village of Pemberton, referred to as Pemberton North, have community water systems. The remainder of Area C is supplied with domestic water by individual, ground water sources. Birkenhead Estates, Lillooet Lake Estates, and D’Arcy have privately operated community water systems. The Regional District is currently in negotiations to take over the water system at D’Arcy.

The water service to Pemberton North was formerly managed by the Pemberton North Improvement District, but is now administered by the Regional District. Eight kilometers of water line currently service the area. The water supply source for this system is several groundwater wells located within the Village of Pemberton. Pemberton Creek serves as the back-up water supply. The bulk of the Pemberton North water system was upgraded in 2004. The Devine water system receives ground water from a well. Upgrades to this system were completed in the early 2000s.

Lillooet Lake Estates Ltd. supplies water to 152 residential lots, while Heather Jean Properties provides water to the remainder of the lots within the Lillooet Lake Estates Land Use Contract via its own system. The Lillooet Lake Estates Ltd. water system is not fully completed as there are outstanding issues with the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority which need to be resolved.

Water quality issues have been identified in D’Arcy and Birkenhead Lake Estates, which are both on ongoing boil water advisories. Funding for a study of needed upgrades for the D’Arcy water system has recently been approved. The SLRD hopes to partner with the N’Quat'Qua first nation in upgrading the water system at D’Arcy. Another water quality issue of note is the elevated levels of arsenic that naturally occur in groundwater, particularly at Owl Ridge. Water supply issues continue to be a problem at the Ivey Lake subdivision, which is impeding the ability of residents to subdivide parcels according to the minimum allowable parcel size.

All communities within Area C rely on in-ground, on-site septic disposal. Soil conditions in the areas surrounding the Village of Pemberton are generally not well suited for the purposes of on-site sewage disposal due to seasonal high water tables and slow percolation rates. Vancouver Coastal Health recommends that the extension of the Village sewer collection system into these areas be considered.

Within Area C there is a transfer station and recycling centre located in Devine and another in the Pemberton Industrial Park. Solid waste management has become a major issue for Area C, and the Regional District as a whole. The landfill at Whistler, where Area C has historically transported its solid waste, was closed in 2005, and the permit for the landfill at Squamish expires in 2008. The local climate and design of the Squamish landfill has created leachate problems making it non- compliant with legislation. There is also development pressure in the area, making the future of the Squamish landfill uncertain. An organic waste composter has been purchased by the Resort Municipality of Whistler and has been incorporated as a component of the Regional Solid Waste Management Strategy. Other solid waste disposal options are being explored, such as the construction of an incinerator or an upgrade to the Squamish landfill. In the interim the Squamish

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200937 Page 48 of 323 landfill continues to receive the Regional District’s solid waste. A review and update of 1999 Solid Waste Management Plan was completed in 2007.

There are at least two areas within Area C where BC Hydro does not service settled areas with power – Blackwater Creek Road and Lillooet Lake. The feasibility of extending power to Blackwater Creek Road was examined a number of years ago and consideration of the project was abandoned. Representatives of Lillooet Lake Estates have actively encouraged BC Hydro to extend power to Lillooet lake Estates and Twin One and Two and they would like to have the support of the SLRD in their attempt to have BC Hydro extend power lines down the lake.

Objectives

To facilitate the safe and cost effective provision and maintenance of water, sewer, and solid waste services.

Policies

13.1. Boundaries within which the Regional Districts intends to provide community water and sewer services have been established, as indicated on Maps 2 and 3. The Regional District shall consider extending water and sewer services as determined by economic feasibility and a secondary planning process. o The Regional District considers environmental protection of all natural waterbodies to be of high importance and is therefore a primary consideration in the evaluation of any new development, including the development or expansion of sewer and water systems. 13.2. The Regional District supports the following process for the administration of existing/future improvement districts by the Regional District: a. Request by Improvement District to be incorporated by the Regional District; b. Feasibility analysis funded by the proponent to ensure fiscal responsibility; c. Implementation considerations including: necessary improvements, costs, and tax implications; and, d. Referendum by affected property owners. 13.3. Land use developments requiring the disposal of waste materials, including sewage, garbage, industrial effluent, waste construction materials, animal waste or soil is prohibited where it would reduce the present quality of surface or groundwater resources. 13.4. The Regional District supports the three R’s of waste management: reduce, reuse and recycle.

Water

13.5. The design of new community water systems shall consider the water volumes required for adequate fire protection.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200938 Page 49 of 323 13.6. The Regional District will meet with the Village of Pemberton in an attempt to work out a long term service agreement to purchase water from the Village for the Pemberton North area. 13.7. Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765 should be amended to reflect the minimum lot size appropriate for the water availability at Ivey Lake. 13.8. The SLRD will cooperate with Lillooet Lake Estates Ltd. and Vancouver Coastal Health Authority to work toward resolution of outstanding issues regarding the community water system at Lillooet Lake Estates. 13.9. Known aquifers are identified on Map 7. Consideration should be given to incorporating appropriate wellhead and aquifer protection measures at the time of rezoning or subdivision. Where topography is suitable, consideration should also be given to allowing for representative sampling of potable water supplies (in comparison with testing of all proposed lots) in conjunction with future subdivisions in locations where there are known aquifers.

Sewer

13.10. All building permit applications shall be subject to provincial regulations regarding sewage disposal. 13.11. No new residential development shall be permitted within 400 metres of the existing sewage treatment facilities. 13.12. No new sewage treatment facility or expansion of existing facilities shall be permitted within 400 metres of existing residences. 13.13. Property owners are encouraged to properly maintain their septic systems and pump septic tanks as required. 13.14. The Regional District encourages the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority to monitor the effects of sewage disposal throughout the plan area to ensure that the appropriate standards are maintained and ensure inadequate septic systems are upgraded. 13.15. The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure the minimum allowable parcel size permitted in areas without a community sewer system allow for the setbacks between septic fields and watercourses required by provincial legislation.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200939 Page 50 of 323 14. TRANSPORTATION

Context

Motor vehicles provide the dominant form of transportation in Area C. Highway 99 is the major transportation corridor in the region. Secondary routes include the Pemberton Meadows Road; the Hurley River Forest Service Road, which provide access to the Upper Bridge River Valley; Pemberton Portage Road which provides access to Birken, D’Arcy and beyond to Seton Portage; the Highline Road/Douglas Trail a multi-jurisdiction and partially orphaned road linking D’Arcy and Seton Portage; and the In-SHUCK-ch Forest Service Road which services Lillooet Lake Estates, First Nations communities in the Fraser Valley Regional District at the south end of Lillooet Lake and the other rural residential areas on the east side of the lake. Issues affecting the road network in Area C include narrow travel lanes on the Pemberton Portage Road, a widespread lack of dedicated cycling lanes or other provisions for cyclists, and limited funding for the Hurley River and In-SHUCK-ch Forest Service Road. Issues with the forest service roads are related to substandard maintenance, mixing of industrial, public and school bus traffic on the In-SHUCK-ch road, narrow lanes, dust and lack of signage.

The Pemberton Valley Transit System provides four bus trips per day between Mount Currie and Pemberton, linking passengers with the Greyhound Bus and a regular commuter bus service to Whistler. Ridership is forecast at 54,500 passengers per year. The transit system is funded by BC transit, the Regional District (through a BC Hydro Grant), the Village of Pemberton, the Lil’wat Nation, and user fares.

A CN Rail right-of-way runs the length of the Sea to Sky corridor, following the Birkenhead valley north from Pemberton to D’Arcy. The track continues north to Quesnel, BC and east to Alberta. The Rocky Mountaineer provides seasonal service for tens of thousands of tourists between Vancouver and Alberta, passing through Pemberton. With appropriate planning for future development, Area C is strategically positioned to take economic advantage of this tourism venue.

The rail passenger service between Area C and communities to the south ended in 2002 due to economic difficulties. There is a BC Rail passenger service between Lillooet and Seton Portage via railbus. The railbus makes at least one round trip between Seton Portage and Lillooet daily, and also serves D'Arcy if there is sufficient demand. The Seton Lake Indian Band manages ticket sales, marketing, and customer service for the shuttle service.

Air travel to Area C is currently served by the Pemberton Airport. The Pemberton Airport has over 400 fixed wing and helicopter landings a year with most of the volume occurring in August. Airport users include emergency vehicles, commercial companies such as heliski operators, gliders, and local aircraft. There are no lights, towers or navigational assistance, however, expansion to the runway and facilities has been discussed by the Village of Pemberton.

Objectives

To improve access by providing for a safe and efficient transportation network that allows year round transportation through and within the area.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200940 Page 51 of 323 The regional district supports a transit system that connects regional communities.

Policies

14.1. The Regional District encourages the ongoing financial support of the Pemberton Valley Transit System. 14.2. The Regional District encourages CN Rail to improve its freight and passenger rail service to Pemberton, Birken and D’Arcy. 14.3. The Regional District supports the development of a railway station in D’Arcy, including tourist accommodation and limited commercial, on a site specific rezoning basis. 14.4. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range, the Ministry of Environment, and the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources to develop coordinated access management plans to regulate access on forestry and mining roads in and around the Plan area. 14.5. The Regional District supports the general objective of maintaining high visual quality along Highway 99 by requiring an effective vegetated buffer to be retained on lands that abut the highway right of way. 14.6. The Regional District will continue to work with the Village of Pemberton to explore options for increasing economic opportunities for the Pemberton Airport in a manner that respects environmental issues and in consultation with the public. 14.7. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Forests and Range to develop a plan to upgrade the In-SHUCK-ch and Hurley River Forest Service Road to ensure a safe and efficient all season secondary travel routes to outlying communities. 14.8. Prior to resumption of active logging in the Lillooet Lake area and the associated increase in heavy industrial traffic on the In-SHUCK-ch road, the SLRD will attempt to secure a commitment from the Ministry of Forests and Range that: a. the road surface will be regularly graded; b. the road through Lillooet Lake Estates and other residential recreational areas be regularly treated for dust abatement; c. posting of warning, speed limit and/or no air brakes signs at the entrances to residential areas; d. The one lane road along the cliffs at the 1 – 2 km mark from the Duffey Lake Road turn-off be replaced or significantly upgraded; and e. a program will be developed and acted on to widen the road for safe passing ad to straighten it to improve sight lines. 14.9. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Transportation to upgrade the Pemberton-Portage Road with respect to its narrow width and uncontrolled railway crossings.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200941 Page 52 of 323 15. TRAIL NETWORK PLAN

Context

Area C has an extensive network of recreation trails, both in backcountry locations and within settled areas. The recreational trail network, the primary focus of the Pemberton Valley Trails Association, has two major components: the Valley Loop Trail and the Mosquito Lake Recreation Area.

The Valley Loop Trail links public lands in and around the Village of Pemberton to form a multi- use trail: an accessible pathway for pedestrians, cyclists, cross country skiers, and equestrian users. The majority of this trail utilizes Crown Reserve dykes and road right-of-ways. A small portion is on private land and has been secured through an agreement between the land owner and the Pemberton Valley Trails Association.

Many kilometers of informal mountain biking trails, which traverse both public and private land, have been established by mountain bikers in the Mosquito Lake Recreation Area. A parking area is provided on private land at the base of the McKenzie Basin Forest Service Road. The most popular trails have been mapped by the Pemberton Valley Trails Association. Many of these trails are very well used, but they have no formal designation and have not been secured through agreements with the land owners.

Trails and roadways within Area C also see use by pedestrians and cyclists for daily commuting. The major destination for most commuters is downtown Pemberton or nearby recreation areas, such as One Mile Lake and the Mosquito Lake Recreation Area. In particular there is significant pedestrian and cyclist traffic between Mount Currie and the Village of Pemberton. The commuter network includes on-street routes and off-street pathways and trails.

A significant new development underway is the Sea to Sky Trail, a multi-user trail optimized for mountain bikes, joining communities from Horseshoe Bay to Lillooet. This idea, first conceived in 1991, has become a Regional District driven initiative. To date a master plan and proposed route have been developed. Partial funding is secured. Establishing tenure and trail construction has commenced on this multi-year project. Through Pemberton the Sea to Sky Trail would be the arterial north-south trail route, connecting the Village with Mt. Currie, the Mosquito Lake Recreation Area and other trails and communities in the region. This trail should provide significant social and economic benefits to Pemberton and Area C.

There is a strong desire by local residents to see trails within Area C protected from development and established as legal right-of-ways. Barriers to accomplishing this include 1) that many of the trails cross private property, and 2) to formalize those trails on Crown land coordination among a variety of governing bodies and stakeholders is required. To achieve designated trail status on Crown land a trail must be approved by the applicable agency, which may include the Ministry of Forests and Range, the Agricultural Land Commission, or Crown corporations such as BC Hydro. Any new trail construction on Crown land must be authorized by one or more of these agencies.

Other issues affecting the development or formal designation of trails within Area C and the Village of Pemberton are multiple and sometimes conflicting uses of Crown Reserve dykes, infringement upon public right-of-ways by adjacent landowners, and the lack of funding for planning and

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200942 Page 53 of 323 development of infrastructure. In some cases major infrastructure improvements would be required to facilitate bicycle and pedestrian movement, such as providing a pedestrian/cyclist bridge across the Lillooet River to the proposed Riverside Park and reconstructing the narrow shoulder on many sections of highway.

Despite these challenges the Regional District aims to create a pedestrian friendly environment, encourage commuter cycling, and increase recreation opportunities within Area C. In late 2006 the SLRD Board directed that a Service Establishment Bylaw for the improvement of trails be established. The service area is to include lands from Miller Creek to Owl Ridge, and from the Green River at Mt. Currie to Rutherford Creek. This Bylaw puts the Regional District in a strong position to apply for cost sharing infrastructure grants from the provincial government, and makes the preparation of a Parks, Recreation, and Trails Master Plan for Area C a high priority. The aim of the trail network policies listed here is to act as a precursor to the more comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Trails Master Plan.

Objectives

To encourage increased use of bicycles as a viable mode of transportation by ensuring an integrated road, trail, and transit system that provides direct access to local and regional destinations. To promote an interconnected network of trails and green spaces that protects and enhances public access to the diverse recreational opportunities of the Area C. To increase the safety of pedestrians and cyclists.

Policies

15.1. The Regional District shall continue to work with the Village of Pemberton, the Lil’wat Nation, provincial agencies, the Agricultural Advisory Committee, local community groups, land owners, and others as appropriate to coordinate the planning, formal designation, and development of the trail network. 15.2. Public trails in agricultural areas should be located and developed in a manner that avoids or minimizes conflict with farm operations. Consultation with the Agricultural Advisory Committee and individual farmers as well as reference to the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands publication “A Guide to Using and Developing Trails in Agricultural Areas” is critical in the planning and development of trails in agricultural areas. 15.3. The Regional District shall consider applying for funding through the Cycling Infrastructure Partnerships Program, or any other initiative that may replace or complement this program, to support the development of multi-use trails and bicycle commuting amenities. 15.4. Residential, commercial, and industrial development shall be designed to facilitate efficient cyclist and pedestrian movement. 15.5. The Regional District shall identify and formalize appropriate locations for public access to local rivers, particularly where existing right-of-ways terminate at the water’s edge. Multi-Use and Recreation Trails

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200943 Page 54 of 323 15.6. The Regional District supports the development of multi-use trails that connect the Pemberton Valley to other portions of Area C, in particular the development and maintenance of the Sea to Sky Trail and other trails shown on Map 3A. 15.7. Trail development is not supported on private property unless the owner has previously given written consent for trail development and public access. 15.8. Where the Mosquito Lake Recreation Area, indicated on Map 3A, overlaps with private land, the Regional District supports the formal designation of recreation trails at the time of subdivision. 15.9. The Regional District shall work with all stakeholders to facilitate public access to Crown Reserve dykes. 15.10. As portions of the Valley Loop trail are within ecologically sensitive areas, trail development and maintenance shall be conducted in consultation with the Ministry of Environment. 15.11. As portions of the Valley Loop trail and other trails shown on Map 3A are within the Agricultural Land Reserve, trail planning, development and maintenance shall be conducted in close consultation with the Agricultural Land Commission. 15.12. The Greater Pemberton Trail Network as depicted on Map 3A is an informational map that that indicates trails that are important to the community or where trails are desired in the future. Some trails in the ALR have been acknowledged by the Agricultural Land Commission in conjunction with OCP Amendment Bylaw No. 734-2001 (Pemberton Valley Recreational Trails & Cycling Network Plan), but have not been formally authorized by the Land Commission. These trails are included on Map 3A to highlight community values to be considered in future planning or development. The SLRD does not advocate use or development of trails in the ALR that have not received the necessary authorization of the ALC. 15.13. The SLRD established the Pemberton Valley Recreational Trails Service in 2007 and has commenced a recreational trails master plan for the service area (see Map 3A). The SLRD is working in close consultation with the Agricultural Land Commission, First Nations, the Dyking District, the Village of Pemberton and other stakeholders to finalize a trails master plan and map that is acceptable to the ALC and other stakeholders. 15.14. The Regional District shall continue communication with BC Rail to assess the feasibility of public access to the Lillooet River Railway Bridge 5 and explore other options for a river crossing to access the proposed Riverside Park. 15.15. The Regional District supports the installation of signage along trails to clarify and publicize standards and practices that promote safety, rider etiquette, and ecological sensitivity. 15.16. Guidelines for use of the trail network are as follows: a. Trails shall be used for non-motorized, non-commercial use; b. Dogs must be leashed or otherwise under control at all times; c. Adjacent private properties must not be accessed; and, d. Signage should be obeyed, including temporary detours to accommodate seasonal agricultural operations.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200944 Page 55 of 323 15.17. BC Parks is encouraged to provide a lockup facility for bicycles at the Nairn Falls trail head.

On-Street Routes

15.18. The Regional District supports necessary improvements, such as dedicated cycling lanes and signage, to facilitate commuter cycling along Highway 99, Pemberton Meadows Road, and other roads indicated on map 3A. 15.19. The Regional District shall work with the Ministry of Transportation to establish a safe crossing of the river at the Highway 99 - Lillooet River Bridge.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200945 Page 56 of 323 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

16. BIODIVERSITY

Context

Area C has a great diversity of wildlife, including species that are considered rare or at the limit of their range in either the province or North America. Wildlife species in Area C that are actively managed for by Provincial agencies include deer, grizzly bear, moose, mountain goat and spotted owl. Other species within the Plan Area that are known to be sensitive to human disturbance and require consideration in future developments include the rubber boa, great blue heron, coastal tailed frog, Townsend's big-eared bat , peregrine falcon, wolverine, fisher, bull and cutthroat trout, and trumpeter swans. These species have specific habitat requirements that can be used to inform appropriate development in Electoral Area C.

Key habitats for mule deer within the plan area are southerly aspects below 1400 m that provide preferred forage species. Grizzly bears use a variety of foraging habitats including moist floodplain forests, riparian areas, salmon-producing streams, avalanche chutes, high berry-producing habitats and sedge meadows. They also use mature forests and early seral openings. The plan area contains a small moose population that represents the south-western edge of moose distribution within the province. There are a number of sites within Area C identified as moose habitat, including the Soo Valley, the Pemberton Valley, and Upper Lillooet River Valley. Mountain goats are widely distributed throughout the plan area, but are dependent on key terrain features such rocky terrain, steep slopes, old growth forests, and south west to southeast aspects. Spotted Owls are associated with old growth and late successional forests. Mapping of Key Wildlife Habitats (Map 8a) and Old Growth Forests (Map 8b) is included for reference as part of this plan.

The Sea to Sky Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) makes statements regarding conservation of particular wildlife populations in Area C that can assist the Regional District in decision making regarding development proposals. For example, the LRMP states that deer winter range in the Ryan River watershed should be protected, particularly on the Camel's Back; grizzly bear habitat should be maintained in the Upper Soo Valley, grizzly bear movement should be enabled at two identified habitat linkage areas (the north end pf the Pemberton Meadows and immediately south of D’Arcy), and mountain goat habitat at Mount Meager and the Soo Bluffs should be protected.

Electoral Area C also provides significant fish habitat. The two largest river systems include the Lillooet River and the Birkenhead River. Other rivers in the area include the Green, Ryan, and Soo. Lakes in Area C include Birkenhead, One Mile, Mosquito, Ivey, Lillooet, Anderson, and Gates, as well as dozens of small wilderness lakes. Gates, Anderson and Lillooet Lakes have some lakeshore development. Wetlands with significant wildlife habitat value are associated with most of these waterbodies. The Soo and Lillooet River valleys, in particular, support large wetlands. Important salmon and kokanee spawning channels include Fee Creek, Gates Creek, and Phelix Creek, and the Gates, Lillooet and Birkenhead Rivers.

In addition to the Provincial Parks, a Pemberton Valley Wildlife Management Area (WMA) is currently proposed for Electoral Area C. WMAs are a designation under the British Columbia Wildlife Act and are put in place when there is a need to conserve or manage important species and

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200946 Page 57 of 323 habitats while still allowing certain types of activity or development to continue. They are for the conservation and management of wildlife, fish and their habitats, but other uses may be permitted. Permitted activities vary for each WMA and depend primarily on the management plan developed in consultation with conservation partners, stakeholders, and the public.

One of the primary environmental challenges in Area C is maintaining wildlife populations that are sensitive to land use practices and human disturbances in an area subject to recreation and development pressure. The aim of the policies in this section is to address these pressures, as appropriate to the Regional District’s jurisdiction. Wildlife management, resource extraction, and back country recreation are governed by provincial and federal agencies; however, the SLRD has the opportunity to support wildlife populations through comments on agency referrals, appropriate development planning, and policies for the appropriate use of private lands.

Objective

To support the protection of environmentally significant areas, avoid loss of key habitats, and maintain biological diversity.

Policies

General

16.1. The SLRD will consider partnering with the Resort Municipality of Whistler and Village of Pemberton to establish a regional “protect areas network” that flows seamlessly over municipal boundaries. Aquatic Habitats

16.2. The Regional District considers environmental protection of all natural watercourses, water bodies, and wetlands to be of high importance and is therefore a primary consideration in the evaluation of any new development. 16.3. The cumulative impact of development on water quality shall be considered in the evaluation of any new development. 16.4. The ‘hardening’ of shorelines through retaining walls or the use of rip-rap should be kept to a minimum with the exception of required amounts to satisfy public safety.

Development Permit Area 2: Riparian Assessment Areas

16.5. Pursuant to Section 919.1(a) of the Local Government Act, Development Permit Area 2 is designated as a development permit area for protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems and biological diversity. Justification: The purpose of Development Permit Area 2 is to implement the Riparian Area Regulations enacted under Section 12 of the Fish Protection Act, as required by the provincial government. Implementation of Development Permit Area 2 will provide protection for the features, functions and conditions that are vital in the natural maintenance of stream health and productivity.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200947 Page 58 of 323 16.6. Development Permit Area 2 includes fish bearing streams, wetlands and the associated riparian habitat approximately as indicated on Map 6. Development Permit Area 2 includes the following areas within and adjacent to all streams that provide fish habitat or flow into a stream that provides fish habitat: a. A 30 metre strip on both sides of the stream, measured from the natural boundary; b. For a ravine less than 60 metres wide, a strip on both sides of the stream measured from the natural boundary to a point that is 30 metres beyond the top of the ravine bank; and c. For a ravine 60 metres wide or greater, a strip on both sides of the stream measured from the natural boundary to a point that is 10 metres beyond the top of the ravine bank. 16.7. Within Development Permit Area 2, land must not be altered and building permits will not be issued unless a development permit is issued by the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, or unless otherwise exempted in this Plan. 16.8. Within Development Permit Area 2, a development permit shall be issued if a qualified environmental professional carries out an assessment and certifies in the assessment report for that proposal that he or she is qualified to carry out the assessment, that the assessment methods required by provincial regulations have been followed, and provides their professional opinion that: a. If the development is implemented as proposed there will be no harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of natural features, functions and conditions that support fish life processes in the riparian assessment area; or, b. If streamside protection and enhancement areas identified in the report are protected from the development and the measures identified in the report as necessary to protect the integrity of those areas from the effects of the development are implemented by the developer, there will be no harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of natural features, functions and conditions that support fish life processes in the riparian assessment area. 16.9. Development Permits issued may require that: a. Areas of land, specified in the permit, must remain free of development, except in accordance with any conditions contained in the permit; b. Specified natural features or areas be preserved, protected, restored or enhanced in accordance with the permit; c. Natural watercourses be dedicated; d. Works be constructed to preserve, protect, restore or enhance watercourses or other specified natural features of the environment; e. Protection measures be implemented, including that trees or other vegetation be planted or retained in order to preserve, protect, restore or enhance fish habitat or riparian areas, control drainage, or control erosion or protect banks; f. An explanatory plan or reference plan prepared by a BC Land Surveyor delineate the identified streamside protection and enhancement area; and,

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200948 Page 59 of 323 g. Development should comply with the Land Development Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Habitat, published by Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Ministry of Environment, Land and Parks, May, 1992. 16.10. Development Permits are not required: a. For works approved by Fisheries and Oceans Canada and/or Ministry of Environment with respect to trail construction, stream enhancement, and fish and wildlife restoration; b. To resolve emergency situations that present an immediate danger related to flooding, erosion or other immediate threats to life or property, including removal of hazardous trees; and, c. For the repair of a permanent structure, agricultural and institutional development, and mining activities; however, federal and provincial legislation still apply. 16.11. Established buildings and other previously approved uses in Riparian Development Permit Areas are permitted to continue. Expansion of these non-conforming uses requires a development permit. 16.12. The Board delegates the authority to issue development permits to the Manager of Planning and Development (or the Manager of Planning and Development's designate) within Development Permit Area 2.

Referrals

16.13. Pertaining to commercial recreation referrals, the SLRD shall not support proposals unless they demonstrate that: a. Disturbance of wildlife by helicopters will be minimized; b. Recreation areas are outside of key wildlife habitats and Nt’ákmen, as shown in Map 4; c. Information on areas adjacent to or within the application area that support rare, threatened or culturally important plant and animal species is provided and access to these areas is discouraged; and, d. Information on the sensitivity of specific areas and appropriate conduct is provided to recreational users. 16.14. Pertaining to applications for subdivision or development, the SLRD shall not support proposals unless they demonstrate that: a. Wildlife movement between key habitat areas is ensured; b. Information on areas adjacent to or within the application area that support rare, threatened or culturally important plant and animal species is provided and access to and development in these areas is minimized; and, c. All old growth forest stands that are 40 hectares or greater in size are protected. 16.15. Pertaining to proposed resource management plans, the SLRD shall not support proposals unless they demonstrate that: a. Areas of intensive resource extraction are outside of key wildlife areas, key pine mushroom harvesting areas, and Nt’ákmen Areas, as shown in Map 4;

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200949 Page 60 of 323 b. Wildlife movement between key habitat areas is ensured; c. Information on areas adjacent to or within the application area that support rare, threatened or culturally important plant and animal species is provided and access to and development in these areas is minimized; and, d. All old growth forest stands that are 40 hectares or greater in size are protected.

Bear Smart

16.16. Residents and visitors are encouraged to follow the recommendations developed by the BC ‘Bear Smart’ program. Specifically, residents and visitors are encouraged to: a. Dispose of household garbage in bear proof containers or store indoors until it can be properly disposed of; b. Keep doors and windows closed and locked to prevent food smells from luring bears inside the home; c. Do not store food of any kind outside, even if it is inside a locked refrigerator or freezer; d. Do not leave trash, groceries, animal feed, coolers, or any odorous item in a vehicle; e. Do not use any type of birdfeeder during bear season; f. Where appropriate, replace fruit-bearing trees or bushes with non-fruit-bearing varieties; g. Harvest fruits and vegetables as they ripen and remove fallen fruit from the ground; h. Where appropriate, use electric fencing to protect fruit-bearing trees or bushes and livestock; i. Keep lawns mowed and free of weeds, especially dandelions and clover; j. Burn barbeques clean immediately after use; k. Wash and store barbeques covered and out of the wind – preferably indoors; l. Feed pets indoors and store their food indoors; m. Keep composts clean; and, n. Support the development and use of a community composting system.

17. NATURAL HAZARDS

Context

Within Area C, the existing natural hazards can be categorized as terrain stability hazards, earth quake, wildfire hazard, and flood hazard.

The Mount Currie – D’Arcy Corridor and the Mount Meager complex are the most significant areas of terrain instability within Area C. The Mt. Currie - D’Arcy corridor is a mountainous region extensively modified by glaciers, which have left behind areas of unconsolidated deposits. A 1994

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200950 Page 61 of 323 terrain stability report, written by Baumann and Yonin, documents various natural hazards within the Mt. Currie - D’Arcy Corridor and the impacts of these hazards on present and future development. The known hazards include debris flows, rock fall, rock avalanches, and flooding. A three tiered hazard rating system was developed, indicating areas of little or no risk, areas of some risk, and areas of high risk. The Baumann and Yonin hazard ratings serve as a guideline for evaluating the development suitability of parcels in the Corridor.

The Mount Meager complex, at the north end of the Pemberton Valley, is considered to be one of the most geomorphically active within the province. This area is also poorly consolidated and the steep slopes are prone to collapse. Four large landslides have occurred in the last century alone. There is evidence that historically debris flows have travelled down the Lillooet River and into what are now settled areas. The triggers of these landslides include earthquakes, climatic events such as prolonged hot weather and high snowmelt, glacial retreat, and the progressive deterioration of slopes. Overall the landslide hazard at Mt Meager is considered to be high.

One means of allowing development in areas with terrain stability hazard is to grant approval in return for a waiver of rights to sue the regulatory authority in case of damages, known as a save- harmless covenant. An important point to note, however, is that these covenants are agreements between the land owner and the government. They do apply to third parties, such as visitors to the site, who are exposed involuntarily to the hazard while not being party to the agreement.

A second emergency management issue in Area C is earthquake hazard. The earthquake hazard in southwestern British Columbia drops off fairly quickly as one moves inland and north from Vancouver, however, a number of small (magnitude 1 to 2) earthquakes occur in Area C every year. Considering the potential for landslides triggered by earthquakes, an emergency evacuation plan that considers the possibility of rock avalanches and debris flows triggered by an earthquake should be given consideration.

The degree of wildfire hazard within Area C varies from location to location within the community. The responsibility of implementing the Community Wildfire Protection Plan lies primarily with Crown agencies that have jurisdiction over the land and private property owners. Currently, structural fire protection measures in the region include volunteer run fire departments at Birken, Mount Currie, D’Arcy, and Pemberton. The Pemberton/Area C Fire Service Area extends east to Mount Currie, north to the Ryan River, and west toward Rutherford Creek. Control of structural fires can be of significant assistance in limiting the possibility of fire spreading to adjacent forest lands. The Ministry of Forests and Range is the lead agency for suppression of wildfire.

The fourth emergency management issue in Area C is flood hazard, which is significant throughout the region. Much of the Pemberton Valley is within the 1:200 year floodplain of the Lillooet River. Flood protection measures in place include an extensive network of dykes, which are operated and maintained by the Pemberton Valley Dyking District, and building restrictions within the flood plain. Flood plain mapping is available for the Birkenhead, Green River, Lillooet, and Ryan Rivers, as well as Miller and Pemberton Creek. Area C also has a number of alluvial fans. These fan areas are subject to flood hazard due to possible movement of the stream bed and erosion. The fans may also be vulnerable to mudflows and debris torrents.

Objectives

To protect life and property by discouraging development on land subject to natural hazards.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200951 Page 62 of 323 To ensure that appropriate measures are in place for emergency response.

Policies

17.1. Development in areas subject to natural hazards is discouraged. 17.2. Public and private development proposals potentially impacted by a site specific hydrologic or geological hazard(s) may require geotechnical and hydrologic assessments to ensure that adequate protection measures will be incorporated into the project design. 17.3. The SLRD may withhold consent for bylaw amendment or support for subdivision where a natural hazard cannot be adequately managed. 17.4. Where protective works are to be constructed, works must be designed by a professional engineer, an operations and maintenance manual should be prepared, access easements established, and ongoing maintenance program established prior to final development approval. 17.5. The Regional District shall consider the development of a disaster management program based upon the elements of preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation. 17.6. Development in the vicinity of Mount Meager and the Meager Creek Hotsprings is not supported due to geotechnical hazards.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200952 Page 63 of 323 Geotechnical Hazard

17.7. A professional geotechnical report shall be required prior to development where slopes of 40% or greater exist, and where identified as an area of high hazard by the Baumann and Yonin terrain stability report and may be required in areas of some hazard. This report must identify site stability risks, areas that are unsuitable for development, and mitigation measures for hazards that can be mitigated. The development plans shall comply with all of the recommendations found in the report. 17.8. Where it is demonstrated that development may occur on slopes exceeding 40%, the developer shall provide the Regional District with a save harmless covenant, and development must proceed in strict compliance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. 17.9. On slopes exceeding 40% grading and tree harvesting should be minimized. 17.10. Development of alluvial fans is discouraged, and land should be retained in non-intensive uses such as parks, open space recreation, and agricultural uses. 17.11. Consent to develop alluvial fans may be granted where there is no alternative land available, and where the fan can be shown as relating to hydraulic, physical and /or geological conditions. The approval is subject to hazard management requirements as determined on a site-specific basis, including but not limited to: a. Development density regulations, b. The identification of a safe building site, c. Building elevation and foundation design requirements, d. The construction of on or off site protective works, and e. And land use regulations to prevent the alteration of terrain and features that would increase the extent of hazard.

Wildfire Hazard

17.12. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Transportation to: a. To designate and maintain emergency evacuation routes from existing neighbourhoods and future subdivisions; b. Establish a unified road signing and street addressing system, to facilitate emergency access and 911 services. 17.13. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Forests and Range to reduce wildfire hazard and create and maintain fire defense improvements on Crown Lands within the Plan area. 17.14. Homeowners are urged to carry out annual wildfire threat assessments and to reduce wildfire threat by measures described in the Home Owner’s FireSmart Manual, recognizing that the community desires a balance between retaining the visual character of the rural setting with fire protection objectives. (The FireSmart Manual is available from the B.C. Ministry of Forests and Range at the following website: http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/protect/safety/ForestHome.htm.) 17.15. The SLRD Emergency Planning Coordinator shall work toward:

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200953 Page 64 of 323 a. Establishing and maintaining a plan that identifies hazards and risks, recommends mitigation measures, and ensures emergency response plans in place for each existing and future community; b. Identifying a low risk fire safety area where community members can evacuate to and wait until emergency service providers can reach them in case of an emergency; c. Annually reviewing the adequacy of the fire protection infrastructure in partnership with Ministry of Forests and Range and local fire departments. d. Establishing a public information program educating the public on evacuation routes and fire safety. e. Engaging the Ministry of Forests and Range to address wildfire risk and fuel management in higher level planning for Crown lands; and, f. Engaging the BC Transmission Corporation to ensure they mitigate the slash hazard on the transmission corridors.

Flood Hazard

17.16. Development within floodplains shall be built to the 1:200 year flood construction level. 17.17. New construction and subdivision that may potentially be impacted by nearby watercourses will be required to adhere to the appropriate standards of the Ministry of Environment, Lands and parks regarding flood hazard management. 17.18. The establishment of land use intensities and designations for flood prone lands should be cognizant of the flooding susceptibility and the degree of flood risk. Agriculture, parks and open space are appropriate land uses for flood prone lands. Other land uses should be based on the degree of flood risk with residential use being the least acceptable in unprotected flood prone areas. 17.19. Where development is presently located in floodplains or current zoning permits new development, future construction in such areas should be flood proofed. 17.20. A 30 meter setback along both banks of the Lillooet River to remain free of development.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200954 Page 65 of 323 GLOSSARY

In this bylaw: ‘affordable housing’ means a segment of the housing market where a proportion of housing is targeted at or reserved for people who are unable to compete effectively in the existing market housing in the area; ‘community watershed’ means a watershed that has a drainage area no greater than 500 km2, and that is licensed for community water use by the Water Management Branch of the Ministry of Environment, including municipal and other water works and water use communities as defined in the Water Act; ‘corridor’ means a continuous strip of land and/or water connecting two geographically separate points and used for the conveyance of humans, animals, goods, energy, or information; ‘Development Permit Area’ means areas designated in the Official Community Plan where regulations apply governing the protection of the natural environment, the protection of development from hazardous conditions, the protection of farm land, revitalization of commercial areas, or the form and character of buildings, as permitted by the Local Government Act; ‘dispersed recreation’ means low intensity recreation activities that generally occur throughout a large area and are not confined to a specific place, such as hiking, primitive camping, hunting, fishing, horseback riding, and cross-country skiing; ‘farm home plate’ means the combined footprint of a farm’s residence, driveway, and other non- agricultural structures and developments; ‘intensive recreation’ means recreation requiring high use visitor services and facilities, such as developed camp and picnic grounds, ski hills, golf courses, and other sites or areas requiring continuous recreation management and services; ‘Nt’ákmen Area’ means an areas designated by the Lil’wat Nation Land Use Plan where harvesting traditional resources, practicing Lil’wat Culture, maintaining intact wilderness, and providing economic opportunities for low impact tourism are preferred uses. Industrial resource development, independent power projects, intensive tourism and recreation, agriculture, land development for commercial activities are discouraged; ‘percent slope’ means the slope of the land, calculated as the rise divided by the run, multiplied by 100; ‘pesticide’ means a product, organism, or substance that is registered under the federal Pest Control Products Act and is used as a means for directly or indirectly controlling, destroying, attracting or repelling a pest or for mitigating or preventing its injurious, noxious or troublesome effects, not including a product that uses pheromones to lure pests, sticky media to trap pests, or ‘quick-kill’ traps for vertebrate species considered pests, such as mice and rats; or a product that is or contains only the following active ingredients: Pyrethrum or pyrethrins, nematodes, corn gluten meal, mineral oil, soap, acetic acid, biological pesticides, including bacillus thuringiensis (bt), boric acid, fatty acids, ferric phosphate, silicon dioxide (diatomaceous earth) or sulfur; ‘Qualified Environmental Professional’ means an applied scientist or technologist, acting alone or together with another qualified environmental professional, where (a) the individual is registered and in good standing in British Columbia with an appropriate professional organization constituted under an Act, acting under that association’s code of ethics and subject to disciplinary action by that association, (b) the individual’s area of expertise is recognized in the assessment methods as one

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200955 Page 66 of 323 that is acceptable for the purpose of providing all or part of an assessment report in respect of that development proposal, and (c) the individual is acting within that individual’s area of expertise; ‘ravine’ means a narrow, steep-sided valley that is commonly eroded by running water and has a slope grade greater than 3:1; ‘riparian’ means relating to the bank or shoreline of a waterbody; ‘resource extraction’ means the harvesting of timber and extraction of mineral and aggregate resources, including the associated mitigation and reclamation activities and related transportation; ‘silviculture’ means the science and art of growing and tending forest crops, including improvement of natural stands or plantations with the intention of increasing yield by techniques such as planting, thinning, brushing, weeding, liming, and fertilization; ‘top of the ravine bank’ means the first significant break in a ravine slope where the break occurs such that the grade beyond the break is flatter than 3:1 for a minimum distance of 15 metres measured perpendicularly from the break, and the break does not include a bench within the ravine that could be developed; ‘waterbody’ means any area that in a normal year has water flowing or standing above ground to the extent that evidence of an ordinary high water mark is established.

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200956 Page 67 of 323 MAPS

The following maps have been created with the most current GIS data available. Prior to acting on any of the cadastral or Agricultural Land Reserve data, please confirm the boundaries with the BC Land Title and Survey Authority and the Agricultural Land Commission as appropriate.

Map 1: Land Use Designations

Map 1a – inset of D’Arcy & adjacent watersheds Map 1b – inset of Pemberton & Mount Currie

Map 2: Service Areas Fire Protection Areas Community Sewer and Water Service Areas

Map 3: Recreation Existing Parks, Proposed Parks Existing Trails, Proposed Trails Commercial Recreation Buffer Back Country Recreation

Map 3a: Greater Pemberton Trail Network

Map 4: Nt’ákmen Areas

Map 5: Hazards Mount Currie – D’Arcy Corridor Geohazards Pemberton Valley Floodplain

Map 6: Riparian Assessment Areas

Map 7: Known Aquifers

Map 8a: Key Wildlife Habitats Wildlife Management Areas (subject to map data availability from Ministry of Environment) Key habitats (deer winter range, moose winter range, key grizzly bear habitats, mountain goat winter range, spotted owl management areas) Grizzly bear linkage zones

Map 8b: Old Growth Forests Old growth forest areas Community Crown Land Interface

Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008 August 20, 2008 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 200957 Page 68 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 69 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 70 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 71 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 72 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 73 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 74 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 75 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 76 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 77 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 78 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 79 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 80 of 323 Request for Decision

Application for Zoning Amendment – Lot 8 Summit Rd., Gates Lake, Area C

Date: April 16, 2009

Recommendation:

1. THAT agency comments be received. 2. THAT Bylaw 1113, cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009’ be read a second time. 3. THAT the Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District delegate the holding of a public hearing to Electoral Area ‘C’ Director Susan Gimse, with Director ------as alternate delegate pursuant to Section 891 of the Local Government Act, for the consideration of Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009. 4. THAT the public hearing for consideration of Bylaw No. 1113, 2009 be held at 7 pm on Tuesday, May 19, 2009 at the Birken Community Centre (Old School House).

CAO Comments: I concur. P.R.E.

Who Votes: All; Count: Directors; Decision: Majority

Recommendation Report/Document: Attached _X_ Available __ Nil ___

Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined: To provide the Regional Board with referral agency comments and schedule a public hearing for Bylaw 1113, which will rezone DL 1251, Lot 8, Plan KAP 71081 (Lot 8, Summit Road near Gates Lake) from Rural 1 to Rural 1 – Rural Residential to facilitate a lot split into two parcels of approximately one hectare.

Relevant Policy: Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008, Policy 4.18. (site specific rezonings subject to suitability criteria such as soil conditions, slope, geotechnical hazards, water supply and compatibility with rural character of the neighbourhood); Board Policy 6.7: Subdivision - Proof of Water.

Strategic Relevance: n/a

Desired Outcome(s): Ensuring reasonable assurance of adequate water supply, and no adverse impacts on adjacent properties.

Response Options: 1. Proceed with second reading and scheduling of a public hearing, and require proof of water prior to adoption. 2. Proceed with second reading but do not schedule of a public hearing until the applicant has provided confirmation on the availability of water. 3. Request additional confirmation on the availability of water prior to proceeding with second reading.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 81 of 323 Request for Decision

Application for Zoning Amendment – Lot 8 Summit Rd., Gates Lake, Area C

Preferred Strategy: #1, Adoption of the recommended resolution.

Implications Of Recommendation

General: Application is consistent with Area C Official Community Plan, Bylaw 1008, 2008. Applicant must prove water before Bylaw 1113 can be adopted.

Organizational: n/a

Financial: n/a

Legal: n/a

Follow Up Action: Advertise and hold public hearing as per the Local Government Act.

Communication: Inform applicant of the status of the application.

Other Comments:

Submitted by: Planner, L. Griffith Reviewed by: Director of Planning, S. Olmstead Approved by: CAO, P. Edgington

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 82 of 323 Request for Decision Background Report

Paul Smith Rezoning Bylaw 1113, 2009 – Status Report

Issue(s) Defined:

The purpose of this report is to provide the Board with referral agency comments and direction on scheduling of a public hearing with respect to a request to rezone DL 1251, Lot 8, Plan KAP 71081 (Lot 8, Summit Road near Gates Lake) from Rural 1 to Rural 1 – Rural Residential to facilitate a lot split into two parcels of approximately one hectare.

On January 26, 2009 the Board carried the following motions:

‘THAT Bylaw No. 1113, cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009’ be introduced and read a first time.

THAT Bylaw No.1113 be referred to the Lil’wat Nation, Lower Stl’atl’imx Tribal Council, and provincial agencies for comment.

THAT Staff review aquifer maps for the Birken area before requiring the water supply report from the applicant;

THAT the applicant provide a report from a qualified professional prior to adoption of Bylaw No. 1113 that an adequate supply of water for each proposed parcel, of suitable quality as defined by Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality water, is available.’

Agency Referral

Referrals for Bylaw 1113, 2009 were forwarded on January 28, 2009. The following referral comments were received:

Ministry of Transportation (MoT) – MoT replied with the following comments: (1.) Confirmation is required that the subject property remains over 2ha in area following additional road dedication in 2002 (Ref Plan KAP72339). (2.) No direct access will be permitted from Pemberton Portage Road to the subject property. (3.) BC MoT will not maintain any access over unconstructed right-of-way. A permit will be required for works on highway right-of-way should the property owner wish to construct such a driveway. (Staff comments: see below.) Vancouver Coastal Health Authority – No objections to the proposed rezoning however, this does not imply support for the intended subdivision application, approval of existing or proposed sewerage and water supply systems. Ministry of Forests- No comment received. Ministry of Environment - No comment received.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 83 of 323 Request for Decision Background Report

Paul Smith Rezoning Bylaw 1113, 2009 – Status Report

Lil’wat Nation – No comment. Lower Stl’atl’imx Tribal Council – No comment received. BC Hydro – No comment received.

The Ministry of Transportation’s comments were forwarded to the applicant on February 25, 2009. The applicant submitted a revised plan of proposed subdivision incorporating the 2002 road dedication from Ref Plan KAP 72339 (see attached) and demonstrating that the area of the subject property remains over 2 hectares (2.06ha). The applicant has advised that access will be from Summit Road, not Portage Road, and that he is aware of the access permit conditions.

Proof of Water Requirements

The Board Policy regarding proof of water states that “no application for subdivision for residential purposes is permitted unless there is proof of water (500 gallons per day on parcels under 10 acres)”. As per the January 26th, 2009 Board recommendation, staff consulted the online Ministry of Environment’s British Columbia Water Resources Atlas and reviewed the Area C Official Community Plan Known Aquifers Map 7 and determined that no known aquifers are located under or nearby the property.

The applicant has provided staff with a copy of a report from 2001 authored by Baumann Engineering on the availability of water for the original 8 lot subdivision submitted by M. McKim. The applicant has also advised that he is arranging to have a test well drilled at the end of April - beginning of May and will supply the results to the SLRD shortly thereafter.

Planning staff have developed a range of options for satisfying SLRD proof of water requirements for properties located outside of the Ivey Lake/Reid Road area1:

Option 1: Well – The water supply is considered ‘proven’ if a functioning drilled well is in place for each of the proposed lots and a written report from a qualified professional provides assurance that the system as constructed (including any water treatment devices), provides a satisfactory water supply.

Under particular circumstances, the Board’s proof of water requirement may be considered to have been met although water quality does not meet the required standards. Where a qualified professional certifies that the water supply can be simply and reliably treated, a Section 219 covenant may be placed on title identifying the water quality issues and needed treatment. Currently, arsenic over 225 ppb cannot be simply and reliably treated.

1 As part of the rezoning process, one of the three options must be implemented prior to adoption of the zoning amendment bylaw.

2 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 84 of 323 Request for Decision Background Report

Paul Smith Rezoning Bylaw 1113, 2009 – Status Report

Option 1 is consistent with Ministry of Transportation Preliminary Layout Approval (PLA) guidelines, and is the preferred method for proving water supply.

Option 2: Water license - The water supply is considered ‘proven’ if the parent property has a water license issued by the Ministry of Environment that is sufficient to service each of the proposed lots, and an application is underway to transfer the water license to the new lots. A copy of the license and application must be provided to the SLRD. Adoption of a zoning amendment bylaw may be delayed until the transfer of water license has been approved.

Option 2 may not meet the Ministry of Transportation PLA guidelines, which often require that the water system be installed prior to subdivision.

Option 3: Report 2– The water supply is considered ‘proven’ if a written report from a qualified professional provides assurance that a satisfactory water supply could feasibly be developed for each of the proposed parcels. Provincial aquifer mapping3, proximity to adjacent waterbodies, and effectiveness of neighbouring wells, are examples of information that may factor into the report.

Option 3 may not meet the Ministry of Transportation PLA guidelines, which often require that the water system be installed prior to subdivision.

Desired Outcome:

Ensuring reasonable assurance of adequate water supply, and no adverse impacts on adjacent properties.

Analysis of Options:

1. Proceed with second reading and scheduling of a public hearing, and require proof of water prior to adoption. 2. Proceed with second reading but do not schedule of a public hearing until the applicant has provided confirmation on the availability of water. 3. Request additional confirmation on the availability of water prior to proceeding with second reading.

The first option is to proceed with second reading and scheduling of a public hearing at this juncture, and to request that prior to adoption of Bylaw No. 1113, the applicant provide proof of water. This option allows the application to move forward, and gives the Regional Board

2 This option may not be economically feasible for small rezonings, such as a lot-split. The consultant’s cost of providing assurance of the water supply may be similar to the cost of installing the well. 3 To address water supply potential, provincial aquifer mapping must be interpreted by a qualified professional.

3 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 85 of 323 Request for Decision Background Report

Paul Smith Rezoning Bylaw 1113, 2009 – Status Report

an opportunity to gauge the degree of support from the community to the requested zoning amendment before the applicant incurs the considerable expense necessary to satisfy proof of water requirements.

The second option is to receive the referral agency comments and proceed with second reading but to request additional confirmation on proof of water before proceeding with scheduling of a public hearing. The second option does result in a small delay before the public hearing, but it would give the SLRD more comfort on the availability of water should the public raise this question at the hearing. However, this option is not preferred as it potentially commits an applicant to expend significant resources on an application that may not be consistent with the neighbhourhood’s desire to maintain a rural residential character.

The third option is not proceed with second reading until the applicant supplies confirmation on proof of water. This option would entail an even greater delay in the rezoning application, but would give the Board the most comfort in terms of confirming availability of water for the proposed lot split before proceeding any further with the Bylaw. This option is not preferred as it, like option two, commits an applicant to expend significant resources on an application that may not be consistent with the neighbhourhood’s desire to maintain a rural residential character.

Conclusion:

The preferred option is option number one. Staff recommend that the Board give Bylaw 1113 second reading and schedule a public hearing to gauge community support for the requested lot split before requiring additional confirmation of an adequate and suitable water supply. Given that the property is located outside the Reid Road area (where water quality and quantity is a known issue), and the applicant has supplied an initial indication of the potential for an adequate water supply (with respect to the findings of the 2001 Baumann Report), requiring the applicant to supply additional proof of water before giving the bylaw second reading or scheduling a public hearing is an expense that is not warranted. For the Board’s information, accepting technical information such as an engineer’s report to prove the availability of water, following the close of a public hearing is not contrary to the Local Government Act. (re: Hubbard vs. City of West Van).

Action Plan: Arrange the public hearing, and notify the applicant of the status of the application.

Communication Plan:

Communicate this decision to applicant by email and letter shortly after the Board decision is made.

4 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 86 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 87 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 88 of 323 PLAN SHOWING PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 8, D.L. 1251, LILLOOET DISTRICT, PLAN KAP71081, EXCEPT PLAN KAP72339

B.C.G.S. 92J.047

LOT 1 34°26'11" R=15.000 PLAN KAP71081 00°00'00" A=9.015

57.923 SUMMIT ROAD76°14'48" PLAN KAP71081 83.038

REM. LOT 2 163°50'43"

133.201

PROPOSED 174°47'10" PROPOSED

127.946

LOT 1 PLAN 7612 PLAN 1 LOT LOT A LOT B

179°12'22" AREA = 10,347 sqm 111.880 AREA = 10,347 sqm

170°38'12"

175°55'58"

177°37'24" D.L. 1251

A=90.834 A=28.997 61.837 R=982.690 87°37'24" PART ROAD PLAN KAP72339 PORTAGE ROAD

REM. LOT 7 LOT 6 PLAN KAP71081

FEBRUARY 27, 2009

DOUG BUSH SURVEY SERVICES LTD. FILE NO. J09046 UNIT 18, 1370 ALPHA LAKE RD, WHISTLER, B.C. VON 1B1 PHONE 932-3314 / FAX 932-3039 09007A-1 E-mail: [email protected] / http://dbss.ca PLAN NO. SUBD-PR PATH:S:\DATA09\J09046\WORK\09007A-1_SUBD-PR_27-01-09 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 89 of 323 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT

BYLAW NO. 1113, 2009

A bylaw of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District to amend Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002.

The Board of Directors of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:

1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as the ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009’.

2. The Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, is hereby amended as follows:

(a) That the Official Zoning Map, Schedule C, Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002 is hereby amended by:

(i) rezoning DL 1251, Lot 8, KAP 71081 as outlined on Schedule A, which is attached to and forms part of this bylaw, from Rural 1 zone (RR1) to Rural 1 - Rural Residential sub-zone (RR1RES).

READ A FIRST TIME this 26th day of January 2009.

READ A SECOND TIME this day of 2009.

PUBLIC HEARING held on the day of 2009.

READ A THIRD TIME this day of 2009.

ADOPTED this day of 2009.

______Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 90 of 323 I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Bylaw No. 1113 cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009’.

______Paul R. Edgington Chief Administrative Officer

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 91 of 323 Schedule A to Bylaw 1113 - 2009

9192

9179 Subject Property ad Ro 9190 e 9183 9188 ag rt o P n to r 2573 e 2579 b 9143 Gates Lake 2567 m e P

9118 2568 2578

9365 2567 2828 2842 2842 2828 9102

9065

9065 9102

9046 ¯

From: Rural 1 (RR1) ______Chair

To: Rural 1 - Rural Residential sub zone (RR1- RES) ______Secretary

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 92 of 323 Request for Decision

Application for Zoning Amendment – 8946 Portage Rd., Poole Creek, Area C

Date: April 6, 2009

Recommendation:

1.) THAT Bylaw No. 1129 cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1129, 2009’ be introduced and read a first time.

2.) THAT Bylaw No. 1129 be referred to the Lil’wat Nation, Lower Stl’atl’imx Tribal Council, and provincial agencies for comment.

3.) THAT the applicant provide proof of water prior to adoption of Bylaw No. 1129 that confirms an adequate supply of water for each proposed parcel, of suitable quality as defined by Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality water, is available.

CAO Comments: I concur with the recommendation. PRE

Who Votes: All; Count: Directors; Decision: Majority

Recommendation Report/Document: Attached __ Available __ Nil _X_

Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined: Request to rezone Lot 18, DL 1545, PL KAP48955, LLD (8946 Portage Road - Poole Creek) from Rural 1 to Rural 1 – Rural Residential to facilitate a lot split into two parcels of over one hectare.

Relevant Policy: Electoral Area C OCP Amendment Bylaw 1008, 2008, Policy 4.18 (site specific rezonings subject to suitability criteria such as soil conditions, slope, geotechnical hazards, water supply and compatibility with rural character of the neighbourhood); Board Policy 6.7: Subdivision - Proof of Water.

Strategic Relevance: n/a

Desired Outcome(s): Ensuring reasonable assurance of adequate water supply, and no adverse impacts on adjacent properties.

Response Options: 1. Give the bylaw 1st reading. 2. Defer the bylaw until confirmation of adequate water supply is received.

Preferred Strategy: Adoption of the recommended resolution.

Implications Of Recommendation

General: Application is consistent with Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw 1008, 2008.

Organizational: n/a

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 93 of 323 Request for Decision

Application for Zoning Amendment – 8946 Portage Rd., Poole Creek, Area C

Financial: n/a

Legal: n/a

Follow Up Action: Refer Bylaw to referral agencies for comment, ongoing communication of bylaw progress with applicant.

Communication: Inform applicant of the status of the application and outstanding requirements.

Other Comments:

Submitted by: Planner, L. Griffith Reviewed by: Director of Planning, S. Olmstead Approved by: CAO, P. Edgington

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 94 of 323 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT

BYLAW NO. 1129, 2009

A bylaw of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District to amend Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002.

The Board of Directors of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:

1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as the ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1129, 2009’.

2. The Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, is hereby amended as follows:

(a) That the Official Zoning Map, Schedule C, Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002 is hereby amended by:

(i) rezoning Lot 18, DL 1545, PL KAP48955, LLD as outlined on Schedule A, which is attached to and forms part of this bylaw, from Rural 1 zone (RR1) to Rural 1 - Rural Residential sub-zone (RR1RES).

READ A FIRST TIME this day of 2009.

READ A SECOND TIME this day of 2009.

PUBLIC HEARING held on the day of 2009.

READ A THIRD TIME this day of 2009.

ADOPTED this day of 2009.

______Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 95 of 323 I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Bylaw No. 1129 cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1129, 2009’.

______Leslie Lloyd Secretary

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 96 of 323 SLRD Bylaw No. 1129 Schedule 1

Subject Property Lot 18, DL 1545, LLD, Plan KAP48955

16 17 18 13

2 13 ebro otg RdPemberton Portage 6

12 7 3 11

tage Rd 8 4 5 9 Old Por 14

Poole Creek Rd Birkenhead La

keFSR

______From: Rural 1 (RR1) Chair

To: Rural 1 - Rural Residential sub zone (RR1- RES) ______¯ Secretary

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 97 of 323 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT By-law No. 1130, 2009

A by-law for the administration and operation of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Emergency Program And Disaster Services

WHEREAS the Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District has, by “Squamish- Lillooet Regional District Emergency Program and Disaster Service Establishment By-law No. 921-2004”, established an Emergency Program and Disaster Service;

AND WHEREAS pursuant to the provisions of the Emergency Program Act, R.S.B.C.1996, c.111, the Board must prepare or cause to be prepared local emergency plans respecting preparation for, response to and recovery from emergencies and disasters and establish and maintain an emergency management organization to develop, maintain and implement emergency plans and other preparedness, response and recovery measures for emergencies and disasters for the electoral areas within the Regional District;

NOW THEREFORE, the Board in open meeting assembled enacts as follows:

1. Citation

1.1 This By-law shall be cited as the “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Emergency Program and Disaster Operations By-law No. 1130-2009”.

2. Interpretation

2.1 In this bylaw:

a) “Act” means the Emergency Program Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.111 and any regulations made thereunder;

b) "Board" means the Board of Directors of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District;

c) "Chair" means that person elected by the Board as chair;

d) "Declaration of a state of local emergency” means a declaration of the Board or the Chair that an Emergency exists or is imminent in the Regional District;

e) "Disaster" means a calamity that: (i) is caused by accident, fire, explosion or technical failure or by the forces of nature, and (ii) has resulted in serious harm to the health, safety or welfare of people, or in widespread damage to property;

f) "Emergency" means a present or imminent event or circumstance that: (i) is caused by accident, fire, explosion, technical failure or by the forces of nature, and (ii) requires prompt coordination of action or special regulation of persons or property, to protect the health, safety or welfare of people or to limit damage to property;

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 98 of 323 2

g) " Emergency Program Manager" means that person appointed under Section 5.1 of this Bylaw;

h) “Emergency Executive Committee” means that committee appointed under Section 4.1 of this Bylaw;

i) " Emergency Management Organization" means that organization established under Section 3.1 of this Bylaw;

j) “Emergency Program” means the emergency plans and other preparedness, response and recovery measures for emergencies and disasters developed and implemented from time to time by the Emergency Management Organization;

k) “Service Area” means the service area established under Squamish- Lillooet Regional District Emergency Program and Disaster Service Establishment Bylaw No. 921,2004.

3. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION

3.1 An Emergency Management Organization is established comprising of:

a) the Emergency Executive Committee; b) the Emergency Program Manager; and c) such other persons appointed and sub committees and working groups established and which are charged with emergency preparedness, response and recovery measures.

4. EMERGENCY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

4.1 An Emergency Executive Committee is established comprising of:

a) the Directors of the Board representing Electoral Areas ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ and “D”; b) the Chief Administrative Officer for the Regional District or designate; and c) such other persons as may be appointed to the committee by the Board from time to time.

4.2 The Emergency Executive Committee shall elect a Chair and Vice-Chair.

4.3 The Emergency Executive Committee may establish such sub-committees and working groups as deemed necessary to facilitate emergency preparedness, response and recovery measures.

4.4 The Emergency Executive Committee will be responsible for the following duties and responsibilities:

a) providing policy guidance and direction to the Emergency Program Manager and such other persons appointed and sub committees and working groups established under this Bylaw for developing and implementing the emergency Program;

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 99 of 323 3

b) reviewing and approving the Emergency Program prepared by the Emergency Program Manager;

c) preparing and submitting to the Board for approval an annual budget for the development and implementation of the Emergency Program;

d) recommending to the Board agreements with other governments, for the purpose of emergency assistance or the formulation of coordinated emergency preparedness, response or recovery;

e) recommending to the Board agreements with individuals, bodies, corporations or other non-government agencies for the provisions of goods and services in delivering the Emergency Program; and

f) meeting not less than once a year with the Emergency Program Manager to stay informed of the status of the Emergency Program related initiatives and activities.

5. EMERGENCY PROGRAM MANAGER

5.1 The Board shall appoint an Emergency Program Manager that will report directly to the Chief Administrative Officer of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District.

5.2 The Emergency Program Manager will be responsible for the following duties and responsibilities:

a) preparing and presenting to the Emergency Executive Committee for annual review and approval an Emergency Program which includes:

i) a periodic review and updating of plans and procedures for that review;

ii) an emergency response exercise program and training program;

iii) procedures by which emergency resources may be obtained;

iv) procedures by which emergency plans are to be implemented;

v) warning procedures to those persons who may be harmed or who may suffer loss in an Emergency of impending Disaster;

vi) procedures to coordinate the provision of food, clothing, shelter, transportation and medical services to victims of Emergencies and Disasters;

vii) procedures to establish priorities for restoring essential services provided by the Regional District that are interrupted during an Emergency or Disaster;

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 100 of 323 4

viii) procedures to recommend priorities for restoring essential services not provided by the Regional District that are interrupted during and Emergency or Disaster; and

ix) roles and responsibilities for all persons appointed pursuant to this Bylaw whose roles and responsibilities are not otherwise defined in this Bylaw.

b) Making such amendments to the Emergency Program as are necessary to ensure that the information contained in the Emergency Program remains current at all times;

c) Advising the Emergency Executive Committee on all matters relating to the Emergency Program;

d) Providing day to day administration of the Emergency Program, including the co-ordination of staff involvement in emergency management, encouraging community preparedness and liaising with external organizations for emergency management purposes;

e) identifying and maintaining information on potential or real hazards and the impact that such hazards could have on the Service Area;

f) ensuring municipal departments in the Service Area keep updated emergency plans that are consistent with and support the Emergency Program;

g) being the liaison with other external support organizations and function as the point of contact with the Provincial Emergency Program and other government agencies with regards to emergencies;

h) selecting and processing candidates for federal or provincial emergency program training courses;

i) coordinating the delivery or conduct studies, training and exercises within the Service Area to ensure the Emergency Program is understood, effective and in a state of readiness; and

j) performing such other duties as may be assigned by the Emergency Executive Committee.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 101 of 323 5

6. POWER ASSOCIATED WITH THE DECLARATION OF A STATE OF LOCAL EMERGENCY

6.1 Once a Declaration of a state of local emergency is made by the Board or the Chair pursuant to the Act in respect of all or part of the Service Area, the Emergency Executive Committee may, subject to the limitations in the Act, exercise all of the powers given to the Board or the Chair in a Declared state of local emergency under the Act.

READ A FIRST TIME this ______day of ______, 2009. READ A SECOND TIME this ______day of ______, 2009. READ A THIRD TIME this ______day of ______, 2009.

ADOPTED this ______day of ______, 2009.

Russ S. Oakley, Chair Leslie E. Lloyd, Secretary

CERTIFIED a TRUE and CORRECT COPY of “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Emergency Program and Disaster Operations By-law No. 1130-2009”.

______Leslie Lloyd, Secretary

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 102 of 323 Request for Decision

Bylaw 1073, 2008 – Electoral Area B Official Community Plan

Date: April 17, 2009

Recommendation:

1. THAT agency comments regarding Bylaw 1073, 2008 be received. 2. That Bylaw 1073, 2008 be amended as recommended in the attached report. 3. THAT Bylaw No. 1073, 2008, cited as ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008’ be read a second time as amended. 4. THAT the Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District delegate the holding of a public hearing to Electoral Area ‘B’ Director Macri, with Director Oakley as alternate delegate pursuant to Section 891 of the Local Government Act, for the consideration of ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008.’ 5. THAT the public hearing for consideration of Bylaw No. 1073, 2008 be held at 7 pm on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 at the Lillooet Recreation Centre, Lillooet, BC.

CAO Comments: I concur with the recommendations. PRE.

Who Votes: All

Recommendation Report/Document: Attached _X_ Available __ Nil __

Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined: As per the terms of reference for the project, the following issues have been addressed in Bylaw 1073:

protection of water quality and fish habitat (i.e. implementing the Riparian Area Regulations); wildfire protection; an assessment of how growing families are accommodated in rural areas, including a review of the number of houses permitted per parcel and minimum parcel sizes; highway maintenance and other recommendations for provincial agencies; preservation of ALR lands and support for the agricultural community; parks; future community growth; recreational opportunities and access management; recommended revisions to the zoning bylaw; First Nations land use plans; community input regarding independent power projects; appropriate scale and density of development on Pavilion Lake; and, updated policies for the Duffy Lake Corridor.

Relevant Policy: SLRD Electoral Areas A & B Zoning Bylaw No. 670, 1999; Pavilion Lake OCP Bylaw No. 770, 2002; Seton Portage OCP Bylaw No. 922, 2004; Duffey Lake Corridor OCP Bylaw No. 479, 1992

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 103 of 323 Request for Decision

Bylaw 1073, 2008 – Electoral Area B Official Community Plan

Strategic Relevance: The Electoral Area B OCP is a 2009 strategic priority of the Board.

Desired Outcome(s): 1. Compliance with provincial legislation, 2. an Official Community Plan that leads to informed land use decisions that balance the values of the community.

Response Options: 1. Give the bylaw 2nd reading. 2. Modify the bylaw and proceed with 2nd reading. 3. Refer that bylaw back to staff for more information or revisions prior to further consideration.

Preferred Strategy: 1. Give the bylaw 2nd reading. Implications Of Recommendation

General: The Local Government Act states that OCPs should be reviewed every five years. There are three OCPs that will be consolidated and updated as part of the new Electoral Area B OCP: the Seton Portage – Shalalth OCP (completed in 2004), the Pavilion Lake OCP (completed in 2002), and the Duffy Lake Corridor OCP (completed in 1992).

Organizational: The Electoral Area B OCP was a major project scheduled for completion in early 2009.

Financial: The project budget was $5000, of which approximately $1500 has been spent.

Legal: The new Riparian Assessment Development Permit Area will bring the SLRD into compliance with provincial regulations for the protection of streamside areas.

Follow Up Action: 1. April 2009 - Revisions to the bylaw are completed. 2. April 2009 - Board considers second reading of the bylaw and schedules a public hearing. 3. May 2009 - The public hearing is held. 4. May 2009 - The Board considers third reading of the bylaw. 5. May 2009 - The bylaw is submitted to the Ministry of Community Development for approval. 6. July 2009 - Board considers adoption of the bylaw.

Communication: The public will be notified of the public hearing via two advertisements in the Lillooet New and email update list.

Other Comments: n/a

Submitted by: Planner, Amica Antonelli Reviewed by: Director of Planning and Development, Steve Olmstead Approved by: CAO, Paul Edgington

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 104 of 323 Request for Decision

Bylaw 1073, 2008 – Electoral Area B Official Community Plan

Background:

Bylaw 1073, 2009 was referred to provincial agencies, adjacent jurisdictions, and First Nations on February 2, 2009. The following comments were received:

Referral Comments –

Ministry of Energy, Mines, and Petroleum Resources - No concerns were raised regarding mining. The OCP policies that promote energy efficient infrastructure align well with the Provincial and Ministry goals. An updated provincial energy plan, including clean energy targets was provided. Encouraged more targeted identification of key community values where IPPs and transmission lines are concerned. (Staff response: References to provincial plans were updated and key community values were more strongly emphasized as they relate to IPPs and transmission lines.) Ministry of Community Development – No objections were raised. Several additional sources of information on greenhouse gas reduction plans were referred to and it was suggested that Lillooet Fringe planning/governance issues be addressed in more detail. (Staff response: A policy on boundary expansion for Lillooet was included.) Ministry of Transportation – Commented that brush clearing is carried out by the Ministry within road right of ways to allow for adequate sight lines, and to give advance notice to drivers of any potential hazards on the highway, such as wildlife crossing the highway. Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) – Additional wording was suggested to clarify some of the agriculture policies. (Staff response: The recommended wording was incorporated into the bylaw.) Thompson Nicola Regional District – No objections were raised. Cariboo Regional District - No objections were raised. Lil’wat Nation - No objections were raised.

Minor revisions were also made to reflect the comments of the Yalakom Ecological Society and the Electoral Area B Director. The follow agencies were sent a referral for Bylaw 1073, 2008, but no comments were received:

Lillooet Tribal Council, Lower Stl'atl'imx Tribal Council, N’Quat’qua Band, Chalath (Seton Lake Band), Sekw'elw'as (Cayoose Creek Band), T'itl'kit (Lillooet Band), Ts'kw'aylaxw (Pavilion Band), Xaxl'ip (Fountain Band), Xwisten (Bridge River Band), Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and the Arts, Ministry of Forests and Range, Integrated Land Management Bureau, BC Hydro, School District #74, Interior Health Authority, and the District of Lillooet.

Respectfully submitted,

Amica Antonelli, Planner

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 105 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 106 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 107 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 108 of 323 Page 1 of 2

Amica Antonelli

From: Trachsel, Daymon EMPR:EX [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 9:15 AM To: Amica Antonelli Cc: Cho, Gayle EMPR:EX; Adair, Bill J EMPR:EX; Johnstone, Heather EMPR:EX; Symes, Leslie EMPR:EX Subject: Referral - Bylaw 1073, 2008 - SLRD Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Attachments: CP1073 (Area B OCP) 090119.pdf; 090202 Area B OCP Agency Referral Form.doc; SLRD Bylaw 1073 March 11 2009 comments.docx

GoodmorningAmica. Thethirdattachmentcontainsourcommentsonproposedbylaw1073,2008.Thecommentspertaintothe policyareasofenergyefficiency,reductionofgreenhousegasemissions,cleanandrenewableenergy,and electricitygenerationandtransmission. Whilethebylawalsotouchesonmining,therearenocommentsorconcernsfromaminingperspective. Thankyoufortheopportunitytocomment. Daymon Trachsel Manager, Corporate Policy and Planning Corporate Policy, Planning and Legislation Branch Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Ph. (250) 953-3730 Cell: (250) 589-0042 Fax: 952-0637 From: Amica Antonelli [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 2, 2009 1:56 PM Subject: Referral - Bylaw 1073, 2008 - SLRD Electoral Area B Official Community Plan

Good afternoon,

I am writing to request your comments on Bylaw 1073, 2008, which is an Official Community Plan (OCP) for the SLRD’s Electoral Area B. The OCP contains objectives, policies, and land use designations for guiding future land use and development within the electoral area.

On January 26, 2009 the SLRD Board carried the following motions regarding Bylaw 1073:

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 109 of 323 4/17/2009 Page 2 of 2

‘THAT Bylaw No. 1073, cited as ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1073, 2008’ be introduced and read a first time.

THAT Bylaw No. 1073 be referred to the Lillooet Tribal Council, the Lil’wat Nation, the District of Lillooet, the Thompson Nicola Regional District, the Cariboo Regional District, School District #74, and provincial agencies for comment.’

As per the above resolutions, I am writing to formally invite your feedback on Bylaw 1073 (attached). The due date for feedback on the bylaw is March 13, 2009. If you would like the bylaw sent to you in an alternate format, or would like to request an extension to the review period, please let me know as soon as possible.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

Sincerely,

Amica Antonelli Planner Squamish - Lillooet Regional District Box 219 1350 Aster Street Pemberton, BC V0N 2L0 tel.: 604-894-6371/800-298-7753 ext. 224 fax.: 604-894-6526

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 110 of 323 4/17/2009 ThankyoufortheopportunitytocommentontheSquamishLillooetRegionalDistrictAreaBOfficial CommunityPlan(OCP):Bylaw1073,2008.

TheOCPidentifiespoliciesthattouchonkeyfocusareasfortheElectricityandAlternativeEnergy DivisionoftheMinistryofEnergy,MinesandPetroleumResources,including:energyefficiency, reductionofgreenhousegasemissions,cleanandrenewableenergy,andelectricitygenerationand transmission.

TheOCPpolicies(4.2,12.5,14.2)thatpromoteenergyefficientinfrastructurealignwellwithProvincial andMinistrygoals,i.e.implementingenergyefficientbuildingstandardsby2010,andprograms,likethe Deleted: likethe LiveSmartBCEfficiencyIncentiveProgram. Deleted: Program.

Actionplansidentifiedforinclusioninacomprehensiveregionalgreenhousegasreductionstrategy (policy4.2,page13)matchwithMinistryinitiativesrelatingtoincreasinglocalrenewableenergy generationinasustainablemanner,andimprovingtheenergyefficiencyofbuildings

Section10,page27,statesthat“BCHydroisworkingtoimplementtheProvince’sEnergyPlan,which hasdefinedatargetoffiftypercent‘cleanenergy’achievedby2013.”Thisreferencedtargetisfrom the2002EnergyPlan.Thecurrenttarget,presentedin“TheBCEnergyPlan:AVisionforCleanEnergy Leadership”(2007EnergyPlan),istoensurecleanorrenewableelectricitycontinuestoaccountforat least90%oftotalgeneration.The2007EnergyPlan,availableatwww.energyplan.gov.bc.ca,further instructsBCHydrotoacquireatleasthalfofitsincrementalresourcerequirementsthrough conservationandtheremainderthroughnewgeneration.Thisisoneofthehighestconservation targetsanywhereinNorthAmerica.

TheOCPreportsthatmuchofthelandandnaturalresourcemanagementtheoccurswithinElectoral AreaBisgovernedbythedraftLillooetLandandResourceManagementPlan(LRMP),whichemphasizes economicgrowthfortheregionthroughminingandenergydevelopmentonCrownlands.Itfurther reportsthatenergyrelatedpoliciescontainedwithintheLRMPemphasizethedevelopmentofnewor expandedenergyinfrastructure.

However,wenotethatinafewplacesinthedocument,theOCPstipulatesthatpowerprojectsor transmissionlinedevelopmentisnotsupported,orthatthereisconcernwiththeirdevelopment.The MinistryencouragestheSLRDtoidentifykeycommunityvaluesinthoseareasaboutwhichthe communityisconcernedthattransmissioncorridorsorpowerprojectdevelopmentmayraisepotential conflicts.ThiswillallowtheissuestobeexplicitlyrecognizedinutilityplanningandGovernment environmentalreviewandpermittingprocesses.Suchanapproachwouldnotprejudgethesuitabilityof specificprojectsinanarea,butwouldallowforfullconsiderationofvaluesbasedonthespecificproject proposed,andmaybemoreeffectiveinensuringanydevelopmentoccursinamannersupportiveofthe OCPobjectivesandvalues.

Aswell,suchanapproachwouldrecognizethesignificantreviewandapprovalprocessesthatpower projectsmustundertake,asfurtherdescribedbelow.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 111 of 323 IntermsoftheSLRD’sinterestinenhancedplanningfortransmissionandpowerdevelopments,the SLRDmaybeinterestedintheupcominginquiryundersection5oftheUtilitiesCommissionAct.The purposeofthisinquiryisfortheBritishColumbiaUtilitiesCommissiontomakedeterminations regardingBC’stransmissioninfrastructureandcapacityneeds.Foryourreference,thetermsof referenceforthesection5inquiryareavailableat http://www.bcuc.com/Documents/Section%205%20Transmission%20Inquiry/TermsͲofͲ Reference_UCA_SectionͲ5.pdf.ThetermsofreferencerequiretheBCUCtoinvitesubmissionsfrom municipalandregionalgovernments.TheSLRDmaywishtoparticipateinthisprocess.

TheOCPpolicy10.16,page31,encouragestheMinistrytocarryoutastudyofthecumulativeeffectsof independentpowerproducers’(IPPs)projectsinElectoralAreaBanddevelopasubͲregionalenergy plan.Furthertothis,policy10.18states“Thedevelopmentofsmallhydroelectricfacilitiesisconsidered tobeconsistentwiththeResourceManagementlandusedesignationwheretheyareshowntobe compatiblewithadjacentlanduses,technicallysound,environmentallyresponsible,sociallyresponsible, andlicensable.”

AllIPPprojectsinBritishColumbiaaresubjecttoprovincialandfederalregulatoryprocessesandrequire authorizationsfromnumerousagencies.Priortoobtainingfinalapprovaltoconstructandoperatean IPPproject,therearenumerousstepsinvolvedinthepermittingandauthorizationprocesses.Existing federalandprovincialregulatoryprocessesassessthepotentialimpactofIPPproposals,including impactsontheenvironment,protectedareas,existinglanduses,recreationaluses,otherresourceuses andFirstNations’assertedrightsandtitle.Issuesareidentifiedthroughconsultationwithprovincialand federalagencies,localgovernments,nonͲgovernmentalorganizationsandthepublic.

Thereviewprocessforprojectsof50megawattsorlargerisalsosubjecttotherequirementsofthe EnvironmentalAssessmentActandiscoordinatedbyBritishColumbia’sEnvironmentalAssessmentOffice. Smallerprojectsareassessedaspartofthereviewofpermitorlicenceapplicationsunderspecificstatutes suchastheWaterActortheLandAct.Awaterlicenceapplicationmerelystartsthereviewprocess. ObtainingapprovalforanIPPprojectcouldtakeanumberofyears.

TheProvinceisconfidentthesereviewprocesseswillensurethatdevelopmentofIPPprojectsoccursin aresponsibleandsustainablemanner.TheminiͲguide,“OpportunitiesforLocalGovernmentandPublic ParticipationinProvincialRegulatoryProcessesforIndependentPowerProducers’Projects,”availableat http://www.empr.gov.bc.ca/EAED/AEPB/AEPS/Documents/MiniGuide.pdf,maybeofinteresttoyou. ThisminiͲguidedescribestheregulatoryprocessesandrequirementsoftheprovincialWaterAct, LandActandEnvironmentalAssessmentAct.

Thankyoufortheopportunitytoprovidethesecommentsforyourconsiderationwithrespecttothe SquamishLillooetRegionalDistrictAreaBOfficialCommunityPlan.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 112 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 113 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 114 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 115 of 323 Page 1 of 1

Amica Antonelli

From: Lorimer, Gillian TRAN:EX [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:36 PM To: Amica Antonelli Subject: FW: SLRD - OCP Review Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed

From: Lorimer, Gillian TRAN:EX Sent: March 26, 2009 1:27 PM o: '[email protected]' c: Katchmar, Cindy TRAN:EX; Richardson, Jim A TRAN:EX Subject: SLRD - OCP Review

Amica,

We have reviewed the Squamish Lillooet Regional District Area B OCP. We would like to provide feedback on clause 8.4. Specifically, brush clearing is done within the right of way to allow for adequate sight distance and to give advance notice drivers regarding any potential hazards on the highway, such as wildlife crossing the highway.

Please do not hesitate to call with any questions,

Gillian Lorimer, Highway Planning EIT Programming & Partnerships Ministry of Transportation, Southern Interior Region Phone: 250.371.3996 Fax: 250.828.4229

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 116 of 323 4/17/2009 MCD response - OCP EA B bylaw referral 1073 Page 1 of 2

Amica Antonelli

From: Mueller, Brent CD:EX [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 3:57 PM To: Amica Antonelli Cc: Steve Olmstead; Messenger, Meggin A CD:EX Subject: MCD response - OCP EA B bylaw referral 1073 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed

Hi Amica - thanks for the opportunity to comment on draft bylaw 1073 that seeks to establish a new OCP for electoral area B. I believe the deadline to respond was today so I trust that there is still time to provide these comments.

I was pleased to see that the RD has responded to the new content requirement for policies/actions/targets for greenhouse gas reduction. First time I have seen an OCP tackle that new requirenment! I have some specific comments on that, but overall my response summary is: approval recommended, subject to the following:

z Our Minister will have to approve this bylaw before it can be adopted by the RD. The Minister's approval will be subject to ensuring the bylaw does not conflict with any significant provincial interests. I advise the RD to address provincial agency comments that are received during the referral process. If any concerns come up please feel free to contact me; z I appreciate the effort being made to consult with First Nations, the RD should continue this effort and also work to address only First Nation concerns/interests that are raised; and z I don't know if there are any "fringe areas" around/close to the District of Lillooet, but in light of the governance review the RD is interested in you may want to put some policies in place to discuss/frame how development/land governance on Lillooet's boundary will be managed. There is language in the SLRD's draft EA C OCP in reference to areas around Pemberton that might be helpful.

Now with respect to the GHG content. I have a few more suggestions:

z In the intro discussion, I think it is worth mentioning the Climate Change Action Charter the Province and Local Governments signed in 2007 (I believe the SLRD is a signatory to the Charter). It establishes directions like "...local government in taking actions on becoming carbon neutral in respect of their operations by 2012." Which is somewhat more ambitious than the 2020 target in the draft OCP. The Charter may also give you other policy ideas. It is available online at: http://www.cd.gov.bc.ca/ministry/docs/climate_action_charter.pdf z I think you could also reference province-wide target established in legislation in Bill 44 (2007): 33% reduction in province-wide greenhouse gases less than the level of those emissions in 2007, by 2020 and 80% by 2050. Its different than the target you reference on page 12 of the OCP. This is somewhat different from what you currently have in the draft OCP. http://www.leg.bc.ca/38th3rd/1st_read/gov44- 1.htm#section2; finally, z the Community Energy Association is hosting a webinar on the energy and emissions inventory. It is coming up on March 24th. If you want to join in you can go to this website to find out more: http://www.communityenergy.bc.ca/ceei-webinar. I'm not sure of the status of the baseline community data that is underdevelopment - will find out and get back to you.

Hope you find these comments useful. Please let me know if you need anything further.

Cheers ~ Brent

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 117 of 323 4/17/2009 MCD response - OCP EA B bylaw referral 1073 Page 2 of 2

Brent Mueller, MA Manager, Growth Strategies, Southern Interior Intergovernmental Relations and Planning Division Ministry of Community Development

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 118 of 323 4/17/2009 MOUNT CURRIE BAND COUNCIL Land and Resources Department PO Box 602 Mount Currie, BC V0N 2K0 Phone: (604) 894-2333 Fax: (604) 894-1518 Email: [email protected]

March 31, 2009

Squamish Lillooet Regional District Box 219, 1350 Aster Street Pemberton, BC V0N 2L0 Fax: (604) 894 - 6526

Attention: Amica Antonelli

Dear Ms. Antonelli:

Re: Referral letter for Bylaw 1073, 2008 – SLRD Electoral Area B Official Community Plan

MCB File: 02022009-002

We are writing to you in response to your letter dated February 2, 2009 informing us of the proposed Official Community Plan for Electoral Area B and asking us to bring forward any feedback on the proposed Bylaw 1073.

A portion of Electoral Area B lies within the traditional territory of the Lil’wat Nation (Mount Currie Band). These lands have been used and occupied by the Lil’wat since time immemorial. The Province of British Columbia has been notified of the existence of the Lil’wat Nation’s traditional territory.

The Lil’wat Nation asserts unextinguished title to its traditional territory, sovereignty over its traditional territory, and a right to self-determination. The Lil’wat Nation’s asserted aboriginal rights, including title, are protected under s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.

A series of recent court decisions have: x Upheld the existence of aboriginal title in British Columbia, x Declared that aboriginal title coexists with crown title,

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 119 of 323 x Limited the instances in which aboriginal title can be infringed by British Columbia or a third party, x Established strict criteria for any such infringement, x Declared that aboriginal title includes the right to choose the use to which the land is put, x Placed a legal duty on the Province of British Columbia to undertake meaningful consultation with First Nations and accommodate potential infringement and x Declared that accommodation may have economic and/or cultural components.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court of British Columbia stated in the Tsilhqot’in decision, “the right to use resources, the right to choose land use, and the right to direct and benefit from the economic potential of the land are all aspect of Aboriginal title”.

As a consequence of these decisions, there is a legal obligation to consult with and, where appropriate, accommodate the aboriginal title and rights of the Lil’wat Nation.

We have reviewed the information provided with this referral. We do not have any comments at this time regarding this proposed land use plan. However, if any new information were to arise that indicates there may be impacts on Lil’wat aboriginal rights, title or interests, we would expect to receive notice and to have an opportunity to provide comments at that time. Furthermore, nothing in this letter is intended to affect the scope of, or the opportunity to exercise, any of the Lil’wat’s aboriginal rights, nor is it intended to accept any infringement of the same.

Kúkwstumɻckacw,

______Lucinda Phillips, Director Land and Resources Department Mount Currie Band – Lil’wat Nation

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 120 of 323 APRIL 2009

Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area B Official Community Plan

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 121 of 323 APRIL 2009

SQUAMISH LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO. 1073, 2008

A bylaw of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District to adopt an Official Community Plan for Electoral Area B.

WHEREAS the Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District wishes to adopt a new Electoral Area B Official Community Plan;

NOW THEREFORE, the Regional Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:

1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008.’

2. Schedule A to Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008 is attached to and forms part of this bylaw.

3. The Duffey Lake Corridor Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 479, 1992 is rescinded.

4. The Seton Portage and Anderson/Seton Lakes Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 922, 2004 is rescinded.

5. The Pavilion Lake Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 770, 2002 is rescinded.

READ A FIRST TIME this 26th day of January , 2009.

READ A SECOND TIME this day of , 2009.

PUBLIC HEARING held on the day of , 2009.

READ A THIRD TIME this day of , 2009.

APPROVED BY THE MINISTER OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT on this day of , 2009.

ADOPTED this day of , 2009.

______Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer

I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Bylaw No. 1073 cited as ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008’ as read a third time.

______Paul R. Edgington Chief Administrative Officer

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 122 of 323 APRIL 2009

SCHEDULE A

ELECTORAL AREA B OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ...... 3

PLANNING PROCESS...... 3 AMENDING THE PLAN...... 4 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREAS...... 4 COMMUNITY...... 4

1. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ...... 4 2. CULTURAL HERITAGE ...... 7 3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ...... 8 4. GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION STRATEGY ...... 11 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT...... 13

5. BIODIVERSITY ...... 13 6. NATURAL HAZARDS...... 17 SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE ...... 21

7. SERVICES &UTILITIES ...... 21 8. TRANSPORTATION...... 22 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS...... 24

9. RESIDENTIAL AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL...... 24 10. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ...... 26 11. AGRICULTURE ...... 31 12. COMMERCIAL AND RESORT COMMERCIAL...... 33 13. INDUSTRIAL...... 34 14. INSTITUTIONAL ...... 35 15. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA ...... 35 16. PARK ...... 36 PAVILION LAKE SUB-AREA PLAN...... 38

SETON PORTAGE SUB-AREA PLAN...... 44

YALAKOM VALLEY SUB-AREA PLAN ...... 52

MAPS:

Map 1: Electoral Area B Overview Map 7: Seton Portage Sub-area Plan Map 2: Critical Wildlife Habitats Map 8: Seton Portage Land Use Map 3: Riparian Assessment Areas Map 9: Yalakom Valley Land Use Map 4: Terrain Stability Map 10: Recreation Sites & Trails Map 5: Electoral Area B Land Use Map 6: Pavilion Lake Land Use

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 123 of 323 APRIL 2009

INTRODUCTION

The Electoral Area B Official Community Plan (OCP) contains objectives, policies, and land use designations adopted by the Squamish Lillooet Regional District Board of Directors. The purpose of these objectives, policies, and designations is to provide direction for land use and development that are consistent with the community values of the electoral area. The policies of the plan are meant to balance the demands placed on the land base in order to ensure an equitable, comprehensive, and logical distribution of land uses. Policies are often implemented on a long-term basis, generally over a 10 to 15 year period.

The OCP provides a basis for the following actions:

a) The adoption or amendment of land use regulations, such as the zoning bylaw; b) The direction of public and private investment; c) The guidance of elected officials, and others having statutory approval authority, in the evaluation of proposals, referrals, and amendment of bylaws; and, d) Bringing the SLRD into compliance with provincial regulations, such as the Riparian Area Regulation and the greenhouse gas management requirements of the Local Government Act.

The Electoral Area B OCP updates and consolidates three previously written OCPs, and provides new policy direction for the electoral area as a whole. The following OCPs are consolidated into the Electoral Area B OCP:

1. Pavilion Lake (originally written in 2002), 2. Seton Portage (originally written in 2004), and, 3. Duffey Lake Corridor (originally written in 1992).

Six communities are addressed in the Electoral Area B OCP. These six communities are Seton Portage- Shalalth, Yalakom Valley, Bridge River/West Pavilion, Texas Creek, Fountain, and Pavilion Lake. Policies are provided to address community planning, economic development, cultural heritage, biodiversity, natural hazards, utilities, transportation, and land use. Policy direction is also provided for the Duffey Lake Corridor.

This OCP also has three sub-area plans for the following communities:

1. Pavilion Lake, 2. Seton Portage, and, 3. Yalakom Valley.

PLANNING PROCESS

The development of the Electoral Area B OCP was initiated in 2007. Invitations for early participation in the review process were sent to adjacent local governments, First Nations, School District #74, and provincial agencies.

Consultation and discussions with the District of Lillooet, the St'át'imc Nation, the Ministry of Transportation, Ministry of Forests and Range, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 124 of 323 APRIL 2009

Tourism, Sport and the Arts, the Integrated Land Management Bureau, the Agricultural Land Commission, BC Parks, and School District #74 occurred throughout the development of the OCP.

A series of public open houses and meetings were held in Lillooet and the Yalakom Valley during the course of the plan review. Following first reading of the bylaw, a public hearing was held to provide an opportunity for formal comment on the plan in bylaw form.

AMENDING THE PLAN

An OCP is not intended to be a static document. Rather, it is intended to be adaptable to new trends within society and responsive to changing circumstances within the community. As such, following careful consideration by the SLRD Board, policies and land use designations in this OCP may be revised by an amending bylaw pursuant to provisions outlined within the Local Government Act. A comprehensive review of the OCP should occur every five to ten years.

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREAS

Two Development Permit Areas (DPA) are designated within Electoral Area B:

Development Permit Area 1: Riparian Assessment Area This DPA regulates any alteration of the land or construction adjacent to waterbodies for the purposes of maintaining water quality and protecting fish habitat. Essentially, it governs all lands within 30 meters of a waterbody. See policies 5.6 to 5.13 for more information.

Development Permit Area 2: Wildfire Protection This DPA regulates construction on all property within Electoral Area B for the purposes of ensuring wildfire mitigation measures are in place. See policies 6.12 to 6.19 for more information.

COMMUNITY

1. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Context

Within Electoral Area B there are seven communities or neighbourhoods: Seton Portage – Shalalth, the Yalakom Valley, Bridge River/West Pavilion, Texas Creek, Fountain, Pavilion Lake, and the Duffey Lake Corridor. These communities and the surrounding area encompass 3,461 square kilometres of land. Electoral Area B surrounds one incorporated municipality, the District of Lillooet, which is not covered by this OCP. Neighbouring jurisdictions include the Thompson Nicola Regional District to the north and the east, and the Cariboo Regional District to the north.

Electoral Area B is home to approximately 1750 people. 2006 Statistics Canada data reports that approximately 600 of those people are living outside of Indian Reserves (IR), and 1100 are living within IRs. The census data shows a great deal of variation between census periods, likely as a result of boundary shifts and changes in data collection methods, rather than actual population change. The census data shows a decrease in population of 16 per cent between the 1996 and 2001, and an increase of 36 per

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 125 of 323 APRIL 2009 cent between 2001 and 2006. IR populations are also shown as fluctuating quite widely. The total population of the District of Lillooet, the closest service centre for residents of Electoral Area B, was 2,324 in 2006. Lillooet’s population in 2001 was 2,741, representing a decline of 15.2 per cent between 2001 and 2006.

Populations of individual communities within Electoral Area B are not always known. The following provides a brief summary of each of the seven communities within Electoral Area B:

Seton Portage – Shalalth - Seton Portage is a small community of approximately 300 residents located between Anderson and Seton Lakes. Adjacent to Seton Portage and situated on the north- western shore of Seton Lake is Shalalth, home to approximately 500 members of the Seton Lake Band. The IRs in this community are named Slosh, Seton Lake, Whitecap, Mission and Necait. Along the shore of Anderson Lake, between Seton Portage and D’Arcy, there are also some small recreational and farming communities.

Yalakom Valley - The Yalakom Valley is home to a small rural community. There are approximately thirty large parcels of land in the valley with an average size of fifty hectares. Moha is the name given to the lands located at the confluence of the Yalakom and Bridge Rivers. There are no IRs in the Yalakom Valley.

Bridge River and West Pavilion - For the purposes of the OCP, Bridge River is considered to be those lands along Highway 40 between the Yalakom and Fraser Rivers. The bulk of this area is encompassed by the Bridge River IR, which has a population of approximately 200 people. The confluence of the Bridge and Fraser Rivers is the location of the Bridge River Fishing Grounds, known as Six Mile or Setl.

West Pavilion is home to several ranching families. There are approximately 50 parcels in West Pavilion ranging in size from twenty hectares to 260 hectares. These parcels are accessed via Highway 40 and the West Pavilion Road (west of Lillooet).

Texas Creek - Texas Creek, located on the western shore of the Fraser River where it runs between Lillooet and Lytton, has approximately sixty-five parcels of land and a number of IRs (Pashilqua, Kilchult, Riley Creek, Towinock, and Nesikep).

Fountain - There are approximately forty parcels of land in the Fountain area, as well as several IRs (Fountain, Quatlenemo, Chilhil, Fish Lake, and Nesikep). The parcels range in size from 0.2 hectare lots lining Fountain Lake to sixty hectare parcels.

Pavilion Lake - There are approximately fifty small parcels of land surrounding Pavilion Lake. On neighboring lands west of Highway 99 but east of the Fraser River, including the Pear Lake area and the Pavilion-Clinton Road, there are approximately forty parcels. Many of these parcels are consolidated into a single large ranch. The Ts’kw’aylaxw Nation’s traditional territory is centered on the Pavilion IR, located near the western end of Pavilion Lake.

Duffey Lake Corridor - The Duffey Lake Corridor has only a few parcels of private land and no significant areas of residential development. It is an important recreation corridor for residents of the Sea to Sky Corridor, as well as Vancouver and beyond. Land use and resource management is largely governed by the Sea to Sky Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), which was completed in 2008, and the draft Lillooet LRMP, which was completed in 2004.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 126 of 323 APRIL 2009

Significant growth is not anticipated for Electoral Area B, although the increased provision of services is desired in some areas. The following objectives and policies provide general direction for community growth and development within Electoral Area B as a whole. More specific details on community growth and character are addressed in the sub-area plans for Pavilion Lake, Seton Portage, and the Yalakom Valley.

Objectives

To recognize existing long-standing land uses within the area. To ensure the development of the community progresses in a way that is responsive to the needs and values of the residents, and consistent with provincial legislation.

Policies

1.1. Priority shall be given to the preservation of rural character and ecological integrity when planning for community growth and development. 1.2. Seton Portage and the District of Lillooet are recognized as the ‘service centres’ for Electoral Area B, where institutional and larger-scale commercial uses are encouraged to locate. 1.3. The objectives, policies, and land use designations within this plan are adopted with the understanding that existing long-standing land and subsurface uses may continue. 1.4. The Regional District encourages coordination among the municipal, provincial, and federal agencies having jurisdiction over land use planning and resource management within and surrounding the plan area. 1.5. In planning for developments of regional significance, consideration shall be given to the interests of the St'át'imc and Lil’wat Nations. 1.6. The Regional District encourages the development of community advisory groups and other committees to allow for increased participation and influence by residents of Electoral Area B on future planning and development. 1.7. The Regional District supports additional sub-area planning for those affected by intensive recreation or development. 1.8. The Regional District endorses Smart Growth principles as a framework for sustainable community development, including the following: a) distinct, attractive, economically sustainable communities with a strong sense of place; b) urban development should be directed toward existing communities (avoiding urban and rural sprawl); c) compact, complete, and mixed-use1 neighbourhoods; d) walkable communities; e) a variety of low impact transportation options; f) a range of affordable housing options; g) responsible stewardship of green spaces and sensitive areas;

1 Mixed use neighbourhoods are those neighbourhoods where residents can live, recreate, shop, and work. The land use zoning should allow for a mix of commercial, residential, industrial, institutional, etc cetera.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 127 of 323 APRIL 2009

h) integrity of a productive agricultural and forestry land base; i) energy efficient infrastructure; j) early and ongoing public involvement that respects community values and visions; k) a culture of cooperation, coordination, and collaboration between local governments, provincial agencies, federal agencies, and First Nations.

Governance

1.9. The 2008 District of Lillooet OCP does not identify any non-IR lands within Electoral Area B as being needed to accommodate future growth. Where future growth nodes are identified on the boundaries of Lillooet, and a comprehensive servicing analysis demonstrates the feasibility of urban expansion, the land to be developed should be included at an appropriate time within the District. 1.10.The planning process for boundary expansion should be undertaken as a collaborative effort by the District of Lillooet, the SLRD, the St'át'imc Nation, landowners, residents, and provincial agencies. The planning process should reflect the objectives and policies of this plan, the policies of the District of Lillooet, and the values and economic aspirations of the St'át'imc Nation and other members of the community.

2. CULTURAL HERITAGE

Context

Electoral Area B is the traditional territory of the St'át'imc and Lil’wat Nations. Large hunter-gatherer winter villages of 500 to 1000 people historically existed alongside the region’s lakes and rivers. Rich salmon stocks supported the aboriginal economy.

Europeans first came to the area in 1808, which was the year of Simon Fraser's journey through the region as he sought a passage to the Pacific Ocean. Hudson Bay Company employees began to arrive in the 1820s and 1840s. This was followed by the gold rush of 1858. Settlers began farming along the fertile river bottoms and benches in the mid 1850s. Lillooet was the terminus of the Douglas/Harrison trail and Mile 0 of the Cariboo Road. At the peak of the gold rush, Lillooet had a population of 16,000 people. The railway arrived in 1912.

For the majority of time that people have lived within Electoral Area B, no written records were made. Archaeological sites and oral tradition are the only vestiges of the area’s rich history, which extends back many thousands of years. Archaeological sites contain unique information about the region’s past and are protected under the Heritage Conservation Act on both private and Crown land, and whether the sites are known or unrecorded.

Data from the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and the Arts’ Archaeology Branch indicates that within the plan area there are a large number of St'át'imc and Lil’wat historical sites and artefacts dating from the pre-European contact era. These historical sites and artefacts include village sites, pictographs, pit houses, storage and cooking pits, stone tools, burial sites, culturally modified trees, and historic trails. For example, the Anderson Lake pack trail and Douglas Trail were used as major trade and transportation routes prior to the arrival of Europeans. There are old village sites and the remains of pit houses scattered throughout Electoral Area B, such as at Tiffin, several kilometres south of the Ts'kw'aylaxw Band

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 128 of 323 APRIL 2009

Office, and on Anderson Lake in Seton Portage. Other archaeological resources within Electoral Area B include old mining cabins and remains of early non-native settlements and mining operations. The Seton Portage Historic Provincial Park commemorates the location of the first railway in British Columbia.

Through the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and the Arts’ Archaeology Branch, archaeological potential mapping is available to identify areas where unrecorded archaeological sites are likely to occur.

Objective

To support the identification, protection, and conservation of heritage resources, including historical buildings, pre-contact archaeological sites, and historic trails.

Policies

2.1. Development proponents shall consider the significance of heritage resources during all phases of project planning, design, implementation, and operation. 2.2. Where a development overlaps with a known archaeological site, a qualified archaeologist shall be engaged by the developer to determine the appropriate measures for managing impacts to the archaeological resources. 2.3. As per Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and the Arts requirements, developers shall have a heritage permit to alter or develop within an archaeological site. 2.4. The Regional District encourages the development of a heritage inventory and designation of heritage trails by interested parties. 2.5. The Regional District shall promote the use of St'át'imc and Lil’wat place names.

3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Context

Statistics Canada reports that within Electoral Area B, an equal share of jobs is provided by the following five sectors: agriculture and resource based industries, manufacturing and construction, health and education, business services, including tourism, and ‘other services’, which includes wholesale and retail trade. This employment mix reflects the current shift away from a resource-based economy, and also, that the service centre of Lillooet provides much of the employment to Electoral Area B residents.

A number of economic development plans and studies have been carried out for the District of Lillooet and the surrounding areas, including Electoral Area B. Many of these studies emphasize building on the existing tourism industry to bolster the local economy. Existing tourism operations within Electoral Area B include rafting tours, heliskiing, snowmobiling, guest ranches, and golf. New tourism operations developed in a locally responsive manner are reported to have support from the community. The 2008 Tourism Development Plan developed for the District of Lillooet lists resorts, touring products, adventure products, cultural heritage interpretation, and agritourism as providing the best opportunity for tourism development in the region. There has also been First Nation interest in developing cultural tourism products featuring dancing, story telling, carving, and aboriginal art. Agriculture, and agritourism in particular, have potential to grow within Electoral Area B. In 2007, provincial government funding was allocated to a feasibility assessment of growing wine grapes in the Lillooet area.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 129 of 323 APRIL 2009

A significant factor limiting tourism and other economic development within Electoral Area B is the remoteness of the area from major centres, and the rough condition of regional transportation routes into the area. These factors affect the number of tourists coming to the area, the ability of local merchants to access supplies, and the number of permanent residents that support local businesses year round. The Enhanced Economic Direction for the Squamish Lillooet Regional District (October 2001) study identified improved transportation linkages to Electoral Areas A and B, and sustained and expanded passenger rail service to Lillooet, as important priorities. The SLRD’s Regional Growth Strategy also emphasizes the need for improved transportation linkages.

A second explanation for the relatively slow growth of the tourism industry within Lillooet and Electoral Area B suggested in the 2005 Lillooet-Lytton Tourism Diversification Project is the lack of an established destination resort and accommodation. This is seen as an obstacle to developing other tourism offerings. A multi-season, larger scale resort related to golf or downhill skiing was suggested in the study as the needed magnet to attract tourists into the area. Boutique lodges are another concept promoted for building on tourism in Electoral Area B.

Sites that have been suggested for boutique lodges, similar to the Tyax Resort in Electoral Area A, include various locations along the main stem of the Fraser River, the confluence of the Bridge and Fraser Rivers, on Seton Lake, on local ranches, and in the Upper Yalakom Valley and Shulaps area. In the 1990s a large-scale resort was proposed for Electoral Area B, namely the Cayoosh Ski Resort in the Duffey Lake Corridor. This proposal had broad community support, but failed to proceed due to unresolved issues associated with aboriginal interests and potential environmental impacts.

Several of the areas suggested as suitable for golf resort development fall within the ALR: the current Sheep Pasture golf Course in Texas Creek, and the Diamond S. Ranch. A potentially more suitable location for golf-related development may be the Kamenka Lands, which are within the District of Lillooet, and are not in the ALR.

Relocation to rural centres, including Lillooet and Electoral Area B, is anticipated to be a significant demographic phenomenon over the next two decades. Economic development within Electoral Area B can be expected to grow in relation to this population growth. Other areas of British Columbia featuring similar climates, beautiful scenery, and reasonable real estate prices, for example, Merritt and the Nicola valley, have been experiencing steady population growth due to an increasing number of retirees and knowledge workers. The ability of knowledge workers to relocate to rural areas is contingent on the availability of suitable communications systems, such as high-speed internet. High-speed internet is available in Lillooet, but is lacking from much of Electoral Area B. Similarly with home based business, one of the limiting factors to growth in home-based businesses is the limited amount of business services available locally.

While the majority of the community is in support of some economic growth and development in Electoral Area B, support for a ‘steady state’ economy has also been voiced. The steady state economy provides an alternative to the traditional economic goal of promoting a constantly growing economy, and has the aim of eliminating the fundamental conflict between economic growth, biodiversity conservation, and maintenance of ecological services. The Lillooet Naturalists Society advocates for a steady state economy, where the economy is established at a size that does not breach the ecological capacity of the region.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 130 of 323 APRIL 2009

Objective

To foster a diversified economy that meets local and visitor needs, that contributes to the rural character of the area, and stimulates healthy ecological and social conditions.

Policies

3.1. The District of Lillooet and Seton Portage are supported as the primary centres for commercial activity and community services. 3.2. Pursuant to section 920.2 of the Local Government Act, all lands within the plan area are designated as areas where temporary commercial or industrial uses may be permitted through an application to the Regional District. 3.3. Future rezonings, subdivisions, and building permits for commercial properties should promote the use of the land by small- and medium-format businesses that are locally responsive and preserve the character of the area. 3.4. The Regional District encourages the provincial government and private businesses to assist in providing the best and most current communication systems. 3.5. The Regional District encourages provincial agencies, particularly the BC Transmission Corporation, BC Hydro, and the Ministry of Forests and Range, to protect the scenic values along all major highway corridors.

Tourism 3.6. The development of small- and medium-scale tourism operations is supported, including agritourism operations associated with farms. 3.7. Large-scale tourism proposals shall be considered where they reflect policies contained in the SLRD Regional Growth Strategy regarding major resort development. 3.8. The development of Agricultural Land Reserve, or other lands with agricultural potential, for non- farm uses, including golf courses, is not supported. 3.9. The Regional District supports the development of a joint comprehensive tourism strategy for Electoral Area B and the District of Lillooet.

Home-based Business 3.10.Home-based business and home industry are supported in the Residential, Rural Residential, Agriculture, and Resource Management designations, subject to zoning regulations to ensure compatibility with adjacent properties. 3.11.The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure the bylaw facilitates and supports home-based business as a means of growing the local economy. 3.12.Where a home industry involves food intended for human consumption approval from the Interior Health Authority shall be obtained.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 131 of 323 APRIL 2009

4. GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION STRATEGY

Context

Greenhouse gases are a natural part of the atmosphere. They trap the sun's warmth, and maintain the earth's surface temperature at a level necessary to support life. However, due to human activities, progressively concentrated levels of greenhouse gases are now found in the atmosphere. As the accumulation of greenhouse gases increases, the amount of heat trapped in the atmosphere also increases, leading to climate change. There is general consensus in the scientific community that the projected changes in climate will result in significant, often adverse, impacts on many ecological systems and socio-economic sectors, including food supply, water resources, and human health.

In response to climate change projections and the predicted impacts, as of 2008 the Local Government Act requires that official community plans include targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the area covered by the plan, and policies and actions proposed for achieving those targets.

Detailed information on the release of greenhouse gases within Electoral Area B is not currently available. Based on general emissions and climate change information, the most significant contributors to green house gas emissions in Electoral Area B are likely 1) the use of energy to provide personal transportation and heat buildings, 2) the disposal of solid waste, 3) deforestation, and 4) agricultural operations.

A wide variety of greenhouse gas reduction targets are already in place in Canada, addressing federal, provincial, municipal, and corporate mandates. For example, Canada is signatory to the Kyoto Protocol which came into force in 2005. It is an agreement whereby Canada has committed to reducing its total emissions of greenhouse gases to 6% below 1990 levels by the year 2012. The Government of British Columbia has committed to ensuring the B.C. public sector is carbon neutral by 2010. The province-wide target set by the Government of BC, is to reduce total provincial emissions to 80% of 2007 levels by 2050. Another example is the Resort Municipality of Whistler, which through the Federation of Canadian Municipalities’ Partners for Climate Protection Program, has also committed to a minimum 6% reduction from 1990 levels.

Since the Kyoto Protocol was adopted in 1997, additional studies have suggested that deeper reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are required to maintain appropriate atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and global temperatures.2 Science-based climate change plans suggest that global greenhouse gas emissions should fall to at least 50% below the 1990 level by 2050. Considering the proportionately larger emission produced by developed countries such as Canada, an equitable way to share the global effort in reducing green house gases for developed countries has been suggested as: 25-30% below 1990 levels by 2020, and 85-90% below 1990 levels by 2050.

The next steps in addressing the issue of climate change within Electoral Area B include a detailed inventory of the local sources of greenhouse gases, and a community-specific emissions reductions strategy that takes into account local social, economic, and environmental conditions. However, without detailed information on the local sources of greenhouse gas emissions, general climate change information can still be used to inform a generalized emissions reductions strategy, including policies on

2 Source: The Case for Deep Reductions: Canada’s Role in Preventing Dangerous Climate Change. 2005. The David Suzuki Foundation & the Pembina Institute

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 132 of 323 APRIL 2009 the energy efficiency of buildings, land use planning, local government operations, energy supply, and waste reduction and management.

Some of the challenges in mitigating climate change that are specific to the rural communities of Electoral Area B are as follows:

1. Population densities are often not sufficient to achieve economies of scale and support energy efficient systems, such as public transit, district energy supplies, and capture of landfill gases. 2. Promoting tourism as a way of bolstering the local economy is often at odds with greenhouse gas reduction targets. For example, the Resort Municipality of Whistler reports that ‘inter- community’ transportation (i.e. the movement of tourists to and from Whistler) results in fossil fuel consumption that is seven times higher than the in-community consumption. 3. Rural populations are often very dependent on travel in single occupancy vehicles due to dispersed housing and remote resource-based employment. 4. Hydroelectric power projects have already resulted in significant environmental and social impacts, making further ‘green’ energy generation from local waterbodies a contentious issue. 5. A small economy generally means a lack of financial resources to implement new technologies or programs.

Objectives

To develop an appropriate greenhouse gas emissions reductions strategy for Electoral Area B that takes into account local social, economic, and environmental conditions. To achieve carbon neutral local government operations by 2020.

Policies

4.1. The target of reducing green house gas emissions by 30 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020, and 90 per cent below 1990 levels by 2050 for the entire community, is supported in principle. 4.2. The Regional District shall work toward a comprehensive regional greenhouse gas reduction strategy, including action plans for: a) increasing local renewable energy generation in a sustainable manner, b) improving public transit and rail service, c) improving the energy efficiency of buildings, d) development of clean industries to augment the local economy, e) implementing Smart Growth principles, f) improving recycling and waste management, and, g) enhancing urban and rural forests. 4.3. As per the Climate Change Action Charter, the Regional District shall work toward a corporate greenhouse gas reduction strategy to achieve carbon neutral local government operations by 2012.

As initial steps toward completing a comprehensive greenhouse gas reduction strategy and ultimately reducing emissions, the following policies are incorporated into this OCP:

Policy 1.7 – Endorsement of Smart Growth principles

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 133 of 323 APRIL 2009

Policy 3.10 – Support for home based businesses Policy 7.2 and 7.3 – Support for improved waste management and community recycling Policy 8.6 – Support for improved passenger rail service Policy 8.8 – Support for a regional transit service Policy 9.8 – Promote energy efficiency of residential buildings Policy 10.15 – Advocate for a regional energy plan Policy 11.2 and 11.3 – Preserve local agriculture Policy 11.15 – Promote Environmental Farm Plans Policy 12.5 – Promote energy efficiency of residential buildings Policy 14.2 – Promote energy efficiency of institutional buildings

NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

5. BIODIVERSITY

Context

Much of the land within the plan area is Crown land and is governed by the draft Lillooet Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) prepared by the former Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management in 2004. The draft LRMP, in addition to other data provided by the provincial government and the St'át'imc and Lil’wat Nations, is used to inform the SLRD’s response to development and resource use proposals.

Electoral Area B provides important wildlife habitat for a variety of species (see Map 2). Wildlife reported to live within Electoral Area B includes cougar, bobcat, lynx, wolf, coyote, grizzly bear, black bear, beaver, moose, mountain goat, mule deer, sheep, and other small mammals, birds, and amphibians. Potential habitat for endangered and threatened species, such as the northern spotted owl, tailed frogs, fisher, bighorn sheep, and grizzly bear, is also found in the region. Bighorn sheep have migration corridors in and out of the north end of the Yalakom Valley. Known northern spotted owl long-term activity centres are located near Seton Portage, the Duffey Lake Corridor, and Texas Creek. The plan area encompasses some of the most threatened grizzly bear population units (GBPU’s) in the province, including the Stein-Nahatlatch GBPU. Most of Electoral Area B west of the Fraser River is designated as a grizzly bear recovery area. These habitats are key areas to protect from future development and disturbance. Minimizing road construction is a key directive in the recovery of disturbance sensitive species such as the grizzly bear.

Electoral Area B is located within the Fraser River watershed. Smaller tributaries to the Fraser River found within Electoral Area B include the Bridge, Seton, and Yalakom Rivers, as well as Cayoosh Creek. Local fish species include four species of pacific salmon (chinook, coho, pink, and sockeye), steelhead, bull trout, white sturgeon, rainbow trout, kokanee, white fish, sucker, Dolly Varden, brown trout, and brook trout. The Duffey Lake Corridor and Seton Lake area are recognized as regionally significant bull trout habitat.

Fishing, and the locations where fishing occur, are considered to be of fundamental cultural importance to the St'át'imc Nation. The St’át’imc Land Use Plan recommends that a fifty metre buffer on either side of all fish bearing streams be provided where development or resource use is proposed.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 134 of 323 APRIL 2009

The Province requires that local governments protect fish habitat from disturbance arising from residential, commercial, and industrial development by implementing the Riparian Area Regulation (RAR). RAR, enacted under Section 12 of the Fish Protection Act in July 2004, applies to all waterbodies within Electoral Area B. The development permit designation described below is intended to address water quality protection throughout the plan area and satisfy the requirements of the Riparian Area Regulation. The following definitions apply:

‘natural boundary’ means the visible high water mark of a stream where the presence and action of the water are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark on the soil of the bed of the stream a character distinct from that of its banks, in vegetation, as well as in the nature of the soil itself, and includes the active floodplain; ‘Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP)’ means an applied scientist or technologist, acting alone or together with another qualified environmental professional, where (a) the individual is registered and in good standing in British Columbia with an appropriate professional organization constituted under an Act, acting under that association’s code of ethics and subject to disciplinary action by that association, (b) the individual’s area of expertise is recognized in the assessment methods as one that is acceptable for the purpose of providing all or part of an assessment report in respect of that development proposal, and (c) the individual is acting within that individual’s area of expertise; ‘ravine’ means a narrow, steep-sided valley that is commonly eroded by running water and has a slope grade greater than 3:1; ‘top of the ravine bank’ means the first significant break in a ravine slope where the break occurs such that the grade beyond the break is flatter than 3:1 for a minimum distance of 15 metres measured perpendicularly from the break, and the break does not include a bench within the ravine that could be developed; ‘waterbody’ means any area that in a normal year has water flowing or standing above ground to the extent that evidence of an ordinary high water mark is established.

Objectives

To support protection of environmentally significant areas, avoid loss of key habitats, and maintain biological diversity. To recognize the importance of water resources and protect and improve the quality and quantity of those resources for future generations.

Policies

5.1. In order to maintain biodiversity and support intact ecosystems, intensive recreation, subdivision, and rezoning of lands shall be discouraged in critical wildlife habitats, including those indicated on Map 2. Motorized vehicles should be limited to traversing these areas using the most direct route.

Water Resources 5.2. The Regional District considers environmental protection of all natural waterbodies to be of high importance, and is therefore a primary consideration in the evaluation of any new development.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 135 of 323 APRIL 2009

5.3. The cumulative impact of development on water quality should be considered in the evaluation of any new development. 5.4. Land use developments requiring the disposal of waste materials, including sewage, garbage, industrial effluent, waste construction materials, animal waste, or soil is prohibited where it would reduce the present quality of surface or groundwater resources. 5.5. The hardening of shorelines through retaining walls or the use of rip-rap is discouraged.

Development Permit Area 1: Riparian Assessment Areas 5.6. Pursuant to Section 919.1(a) of the Local Government Act, Development Permit Area 1 (DPA 1) is designated as a development permit area for protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems, and biological diversity. Justification: The purpose of DPA 1 is to implement the Riparian Areas Regulation enacted under Section 12 of the Fish Protection Act, as required by the provincial government. Implementation of DPA 1 will provide protection for the features, functions, and conditions that are vital in the natural maintenance of stream health and productivity.

5.7. DPA 1 includes fish bearing streams, lakes, wetlands, and the associated riparian habitat, approximately as indicated on Map 3, including the following areas within and adjacent to all waterbodies that provide fish habitat or flow into a waterbody that provides fish habitat: a) A 30 metre strip on both sides of the waterbody, measured from the natural boundary; b) For a ravine less than 60 metres wide, a strip on both sides of the stream measured from the natural boundary to a point that is 30 metres beyond the top of the ravine bank; and c) For a ravine 60 metres wide or greater, a strip on both sides of the stream measured from the natural boundary to a point that is 10 metres beyond the top of the ravine bank. 5.8. Within DPA 1, land must not be altered and building permits will not be issued unless a development permit is issued by the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, or unless otherwise exempted in this plan. 5.9. Within DPA 1, a development permit shall be issued if a qualified environmental professional carries out an assessment and certifies in the assessment report for that proposal that he or she is qualified to carry out the assessment, that the assessment methods required by provincial regulations have been followed, and provides their professional opinion that: a) If the development is implemented as proposed there will be no harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction of natural features, functions, and conditions that support fish life processes in the riparian assessment area; or, b) If streamside protection and enhancement areas identified in the report are protected from development and the measures identified in the report as necessary to protect the integrity of those areas from the effects of the development are implemented by the developer, there will be no harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction of natural features, functions, and conditions that support fish life processes in the riparian assessment area. 5.10.Development permits issued may require that: a) Areas of land, specified in the permit, must remain free of development, except in accordance with any conditions contained in the permit;

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 136 of 323 APRIL 2009

b) Specified natural features or areas be preserved, protected, restored, or enhanced in accordance with the permit; c) Natural watercourses be dedicated; d) Works be constructed to preserve, protect, restore, or enhance watercourses, or other specified natural features of the environment; e) Protection measures be implemented, including that trees or other vegetation be planted or retained in order to preserve, protect, restore or enhance fish habitat or riparian areas, control drainage, or control erosion or protect banks; f) An explanatory plan or reference plan prepared by a BC Land Surveyor delineate the identified streamside protection and enhancement area; and, g) Development comply with the Land Development Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Habitat, published by Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Ministry of Environment, Land and Parks, May 1992. 5.11.Development permits are not required: a) For works approved by Fisheries and Oceans Canada and/or Ministry of Environment with respect to trail construction, stream enhancement, and fish and wildlife restoration; b) To resolve emergency situations that present an immediate danger related to flooding, erosion, or other immediate threats to life or property, including removal of hazardous trees; and, c) For the repair of a permanent structure, agricultural and institutional development, and mining activities; however, federal and provincial legislation still apply. 5.12.Established buildings and other previously approved uses in DPA 1 are permitted to continue. Expansion of non-conforming uses requires a development permit. 5.13.The Board delegates the authority to issue development permits to the Director of Planning and Development within DPA 1. 5.14.Where a conflict arises between DPA 1 (riparian assessment area) and DPA 2 (wildfire protection), the requirements of DPA 1 shall be given priority. (Generally, DPA 2 can be satisfied by applying two out of four possible measures: 1) fire resistant exterior siding, 2) fire resistant roofing, 3) fire resistant landscaping within 10 m of structures, or 4) vegetation reduction within 30 m of structures. However, unless recommended by a QEP, vegetation in the riparian assessment area may not be cleared for fire safety purposes. See Policy 6.10 to 6.18 for more information.)

Referrals 5.15.Pertaining to commercial recreation referrals, applications for subdivision or development, or proposed resource management plans, the SLRD shall not support proposals unless they demonstrate the following (as applicable): a) Disturbance of wildlife by motorized vehicles is minimized; b) Wildlife movement between key habitat areas is ensured; c) Intensive recreation is located outside of key wildlife habitats, as shown in Map 2; d) Information on areas adjacent to or within the application area that support rare, threatened, or culturally important plant and animal species is provided, and access to these areas is discouraged;

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 137 of 323 APRIL 2009

e) Information on the sensitivity of specific areas and appropriate conduct is provided to the appropriate stakeholders; f) Old growth forest stands are protected to the greatest extent possible; and, g) Smart Growth principles are adhered to.

Bear Smart 5.16.Residents and visitors are encouraged to follow the recommendations developed by the BC ‘Bear Smart’ program. Specifically, residents and visitors are encouraged to: a) Dispose of household garbage in bear-proof containers, or store indoors until it can be properly disposed of; b) Keep doors and windows closed and locked to prevent food smells from luring bears inside the home; c) Do not store food of any kind outside, even if it is inside a locked refrigerator or freezer; d) Do not leave garbage, groceries, animal feed, coolers, or any odorous item in a vehicle; e) Do not use birdfeeders that act as bear-attractants during bear season; f) Where appropriate, replace fruit-bearing trees or bushes with non-fruit-bearing varieties; g) Where appropriate, use electric fencing to protect fruit-bearing trees or bushes and livestock; h) Harvest fruits and vegetables as they ripen and remove fallen fruit from the ground; i) Burn barbeques clean immediately after use; j) Wash and store barbeques covered and out of the wind – preferably indoors; k) Feed pets indoors and store their food indoors; l) Keep composts clean; and, m) Support the development and use of a community waste management system.

6. NATURAL HAZARDS

Context

Natural hazards within Electoral Area B include geotechnical hazard, flood hazard, wildfire, extreme weather events, and avalanches. The plan area is not subject to high earthquake hazard.

Electoral Area B has areas of high geotechnical activity resulting from unstable ground and rockfall. The landslide that formed Seton Portage, which split the early Seton Lake in two, occurred some time between 8,000 and 20,000 years ago. Historical records show that along the Fraser River aboriginal communities peaked and declined approximately 1,000 years ago, likely due to seasonal failure of the salmon runs caused by catastrophic landslides that dammed the Fraser River. Terrain stability mapping (see Map 4) is available through Lillooet Timber Supply Area mapping; however it was compiled for forestry purposes at a 1:20,000 scale and is not intended to inform fine-scale development planning.

There is flood hazard associated with many creeks and rivers throughout the plan area. Floods and debris flows are typically associated with the spring snowmelt, which peaks between May and mid-July.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 138 of 323 APRIL 2009

Floodplain mapping is not available for Electoral Area B, however, Zoning Bylaw 670, 2000 provides flood construction levels for Seton and Anderson Lakes, the Fraser River, and other waterbodies.

Wildfire management and emergency preparedness are key concerns for residents of Electoral Area B. Communities are involved in volunteer fire fighting efforts, wildfire awareness, and implementing Fire Smart guidelines. Fire protection capability varies from location to location within the plan area. Volunteer services supported by the SLRD include the Lillooet Fire Protection Area, Seton Portage – Shalalth Fire Protection Area , the Lillooet Area Rescue Service, and the 911 Interior Service. IRs within Electoral Area B have their own fire protection services funded thorough Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.

The recommendations of the SLRD’s Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) are reflected in the policies below. The primary aim of the CWPP is to inform government agencies and private land owners of the wildfire risk and appropriate actions to take to reduce that risk. The CWPP identifies areas of high wildfire hazard, which include the Yalakom Valley, West Pavilion, Pavilion Lake, Bridge River, Texas Creek, the Fountain area, and the Duffey Lake Corridor.

While efforts to support wildfire suppression are recognized as critical to the safety of the community, the importance of the natural role of fire in the ecosystem is also acknowledged. Many of the native plant species are dependent on fire to maintain their natural process. Fire supports ecosystem succession, helps to prepare seed beds, recycles nutrients, maintains a diversity of seral stages across the landscape, controls insect and disease outbreaks, and reduces fuel accumulation. The current mountain pine beetle outbreak in the interior of British Columbia, which is exacerbated by fire suppression, has extended through Electoral Area B and south to the Whistler area. In areas supporting pine trees, it is likely that there will be high tree mortality. The resulting fuel accumulations will pose a significant wildfire threat to existing developments, pointing to a need to find a balance between fire suppression, community safety, and ecosystem integrity.

The SLRD’s Emergency Planning Coordinator is working toward programs to address the natural hazards that occur in Electoral Area B. The programs will primarily target public education, community workshops, engaging volunteers, and developing evacuation and emergency preparedness plans.

Objectives

To protect life and property by mitigating natural hazards where feasible, and discouraging development in areas subject to immitigable natural hazards To ensure that appropriate measures are in place for emergency prevention, response, and mitigation.

Policies

Geotechnical Policies 6.1. A professional geotechnical report shall be required prior to development: a. Where a slope of 30% or greater exists (as determined in the field); or, b. Where requested by the building inspector. This report must identify hazards present, areas that are suitable and unsuitable for development, mitigation measures for hazards that can be mitigated, and certify that land may be safely used for

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 139 of 323 APRIL 2009

the use intended. The development plans shall comply with all of the recommendations found in the report. 6.2. The requirement for a professional geotechnical report may be waived by the building inspector. 6.3. On slopes exceeding 30%, grading and vegetation removal should be minimized. 6.4. Where a geotechnical report concludes that development may occur on slopes exceeding 30%, the owner shall provide the Regional District with a save harmless covenant, and development must proceed in strict compliance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report.

Wildfire Protection 6.5. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Forests and Range to reduce wildfire hazard by creating and maintaining appropriate fire defense improvements on Crown lands, particularly in areas affected by the mountain pine beetle. 6.6. Homeowners are urged to carry out annual wildfire threat assessments and to reduce wildfire hazard by measures described in the Home Owner’s FireSmart Manual, recognizing that the community desires a balance between retaining the visual character of the rural setting with fire protection objectives. (The FireSmart Manual is available from the B.C. Ministry of Forests and Range website.) 6.7. The SLRD Emergency Planning Coordinator shall work toward: a) Establishing and maintaining a plan that identifies hazards and risks, recommends mitigation measures, and ensures emergency response plans are in place for existing and future communities; b) Identifying low risk fire safety areas where community members can evacuate to and wait until emergency service providers can reach them in case of an emergency; c) Annually reviewing the adequacy of the fire protection infrastructure relative to growth and development; d) Establishing a public information program to educate the public on evacuation routes and fire safety; e) Pursuing funding for fuel management projects; f) Engaging the Ministry of Forests and Range to address wildfire risk and fuel management on Crown lands; and, g) Engaging BC Hydro and the BC Transmission Corporation to ensure slash hazard on transmission line corridors is mitigated. 6.8. Volunteer fire protection services shall be supported. 6.9. The design of new community water systems shall take into consideration the water volumes required for adequate fire protection.

Development Permit Area 2: Wildfire Protection Area 6.10.Pursuant to Section 919.1(b) of the Local Government Act, Development Permit Area 2 (DPA 2) is designated as a development permit area for protection of development from hazardous conditions. DPA 2 includes all lands within the plan area, as shown on Map 1. Justification: The SLRD Community Wildfire Protection Plan (2006) indicates that within Electoral Area B, the vast majority of private and Crown lands in the vicinity of forests are

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 140 of 323 APRIL 2009

subject to moderate to high wildfire hazard. The purpose of DPA 2 is to ensure new developments in Electoral Area B are designed and constructed to minimize wildfire hazard, and are contributing to the fire safety of the neighbourhood. Implementation of DPA 2 will limit damage to property, should wildfires occur.

6.11.Within DPA 2, building permits shall not be issued unless a development permit is issued by the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, or unless otherwise exempted in this plan. 6.12.Every application for a development permit shall be accompanied by plans indicating the following: a) Location of all existing and proposed structures, parking areas, and driveways; b) Extent and nature of existing and proposed landscaping, including details of trees and ground cover; and, c) The exterior materials of existing and proposed structures. 6.13.Within DPA 2, a development permit shall be issued if two or more of the following measures are indicated in the application: a) Fire resistant construction materials3 for exterior siding; b) Fire resistant construction materials for roofing; c) Fire resistant landscaping4 ensuring minimal fuel loading within 10 m of structures and projections (to the extent possible considering the size of the parcel); and, d) Fuel removal and reduction5 within 30 m from structures and projections (to the extent possible considering the size of the parcel). 6.14.Development Permits issued may require that landscape plans be prepared in consultation with a Registered Professional Biologist, Forester, or Landscape Architect that provide recommendations for ensuring minimal fuel loading within landscaped areas, ongoing protection from interface fire hazard, and the type and density of fire resistive plantings that may be incorporated within landscaped areas to help mitigate the interface fire hazard. 6.15.Development Permits are not required: a) Where the total area of additions to an existing building is less than 50 m2; b) For renovations within an existing building; c) Where a covenant is registered on title requiring property owners to comply with the DPA 2 guidelines; or, d) Where exempted by the building inspector. 6.16.Established buildings and other previously approved uses in DPA 2 are permitted to continue.

3 ‘Fire resistant construction materials’ are materials that have high resistance to combustion, including Class-A asphalt shingles, slate, clay tile, metal, cement, plaster, stucco, and other concrete products. 4 ‘Fire resistant landscaping’ is landscaping that features trees planted a minimum of 3 metres apart (preferably deciduous and trimmed of branches below 3 metres in height), low-growing non-resinous shrubs, lawn, and hard surfaces. 5 ‘Fuel removal and reduction’ means ground fuels are removed, trees are thinned to a minimum of 3 metres apart and trimmed of branches below 3 metres in height. Clusters of trees are permitted where a hard surface, lawn, or area of low vegetation (1 meter high or less), or other suitable fire break surrounds those clusters.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 141 of 323 APRIL 2009

6.17.The Board delegates the authority to issue development permits to the Director of Planning and Development within DPA 2. 6.18.Where a conflict arises between DPA 1 (riparian assessment area) and DPA 2 (wildfire protection), the requirements of DPA 1 shall be given priority. (Generally, DPA 2 can be satisfied by applying two out of four possible measures: 1) fire resistant exterior siding, 2) fire resistant roofing, 3) fire resistant landscaping within 10 m of structures, or 4) vegetation reduction within 30 m of structures. However, unless recommended by a QEP, vegetation in the riparian assessment area may not be cleared for fire safety purposes. See Policy 5.6 to 5.14 for more information.)

SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

7. SERVICES &UTILITIES

Context

The SLRD provides funding for the following Electoral Area B services: Lillooet Fire Protection Area, Seton Portage – Shalalth Fire Protection Area, Lillooet Area Rescue Service, 911 Interior Service, recreation facilities (Lillooet Recreation Centre, Lillooet Recreation Commission, and the Lillooet Library), and utilities and services (Seton Portage street lighting, Lillooet Camelsfoot TV, and Lillooet area refuse grounds).

Solid waste generated within Electoral Area B, with the exception of the Seton and Bridge River Band, is diverted to the landfill and Re-Use-It Centre6 near Lillooet. A separate landfill services the Seton and Bridge River Bands with support from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. The Lillooet landfill has approximately 80 years of service left. There are some indications that the Seton landfill may have a limited lifespan remaining.

Residents of Electoral Area B have shown a great deal of enthusiasm for recycling, however, opportunities for recycling are currently limited. Efforts are underway to develop an economical recycling system for the electoral area. However, the relatively small volume of recyclable materials generated and the high cost of transporting those materials are challenges still to be addressed.

Throughout the plan area liquid waste is disposed of by individual septic system. Domestic water is also provided through private systems. There are no community water or sewer systems funded or administered by the SLRD within Electoral Area B. New SLRD-supported utility services have not been requested by the community.

Most communities within Electoral Area B are supplied with electricity from BC Hydro and with phone service from Telus or other service providers. There are some areas without these services, such as the Yalakom Valley, which does not have phone service.

6 The Re-Use-It Centre is a building used to store useful items that have been diverted from the landfill. Residents are welcome to take home items from the Re-Use-It Centre for free.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 142 of 323 APRIL 2009

Objective

To facilitate the safe and cost effective provision and maintenance of water, sewer, and solid waste services, as appropriate to the community.

Policies

7.1. The Regional District supports the following process for the administration of future service areas: a) Request by residents to establish a service area; b) Feasibility analysis funded by the proponents or grants; c) Referendum by affected property owners.

Solid Waste Management 7.2. The Regional District supports the three R’s of waste management: reduce, reuse, and recycle. 7.3. The Regional District supports the development and maintenance of a community recycling center in Lillooet.

Liquid Waste Management 7.4. The Regional District considers environmental protection of all natural waterbodies to be of high importance, and is therefore a primary consideration in the evaluation of any new development, including the development or expansion of sewer and water systems. 7.5. All building permit applications shall be subject to provincial regulations regarding sewage disposal. 7.6. The Regional District encourages the Interior Health Authority to monitor the effects of sewage disposal throughout the plan area, to ensure that the appropriate standards are maintained, and to ensure inadequate septic systems are upgraded. 7.7. The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District, particularly around Fountain Lake and Pavilion Lake, to ensure the minimum allowable parcel size permitted in areas without a community sewer system allow for the setbacks between septic fields and watercourses required by provincial legislation. 7.8. The Regional District encourages property owners to maintain their septic systems in accordance with best management practices and provincial regulations.

8. TRANSPORTATION

Context

Transportation to and from communities within Electoral Area B is largely by car or truck via Highways 12, 40 and 99. The poor repair of these highways is seen as being one of the key factors limiting economic growth in the area. All three highways are narrow and in need of upgrades. Highway 12 and 40 require significant structural work to limit rock fall onto the road and stabilize steep slopes. In particular, ‘the Big Slide’ on Highway 12, between Lillooet and Lytton, poses a significant safety hazard to motorists. There is a strong desire expressed by the community to prioritize upgrades to Highway 12, however, the Ministry of Transportation has indicated the funds for major upgrades to this highway, or

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 143 of 323 APRIL 2009 others within Electoral Area B, will not be available in the near future. Work to limit rock fall on Highway 12 and 40 with mesh barriers is underway.

There are no routes specifically designated for commuter cycling within Electoral Area B, or specially designated cycling trails. The community has not voiced a need for specially designed commuter cycling infrastructure, likely as a result of the rural nature of the plan area, the low traffic volumes, and long distances between destinations.

A small airstrip within the District of Lillooet services Electoral Area B. It is managed by the District of Lillooet. While there are no scheduled flights, the airport is viewed as important to future economic development of the area. Airport noise is not known to negatively impact residents of Electoral Area B. Extending the runway to 1500 meters and adding lighting are possibilities for future development.

Public transit is largely absent from Electoral Area B. There is no passenger rail service to Lillooet from southern communities, and there is no Greyhound bus service. There is a passenger train that runs between Lillooet and Seton Portage - Shalalth, which is administered by the Seton Band.

Section 877(3) of the Local Government Act states that an official community plan must include targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the area covered by the plan, and policies and actions of the local government proposed with respect to achieving those targets. The strategy for reducing the greenhouse gas emissions within Electoral Area B is in part based on creating an economical public transit system.

Objectives

To support a safe and efficient road network and air transport facilities that allow year round transportation to and within the area. To establish a cost effective regional public transit service and decrease green house gas emissions by limiting car travel.

Policies

8.1. Road improvement is supported where it is compatible with the social, environmental, and economic goals of the community. 8.2. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Transportation to: a) continue improvements to Highways 12, 40, and 99 to ensure safe and efficient primary travel corridors throughout the year; b) designate and maintain emergency evacuation routes from existing neighbourhoods and future developments; c) improve maintenance to the West Pavilion Forest Service Road and Douglas Tail/Highline. d) Establish a unified road signing system to facilitate emergency access and 911 services. 8.3. During the construction and maintenance of roads, the Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range and the Ministry of Transportation to ensure: a) bridge spans are adequate to permit and encourage the movement of wildlife, particularly along the Duffey Lake Road; b) wildlife movement corridors are documented and protected; and,

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 144 of 323 APRIL 2009

c) no roadside pullouts are created at sites that will promote human-wildlife conflicts and wildlife habituation. 8.4. The Regional District supports the maintenance of high visual quality along Highway 99 by requiring a 20 metre vegetated buffer to be retained on lands that abut the highway right of way. 8.5. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range, the Ministry of Environment, and the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources to develop coordinated access management plans to regulate access on forestry and mining roads in and around the plan area. 8.6. The Regional District encourages CN Rail to improve its freight and passenger rail service to Lillooet and Seton Portage - Shalalth. 8.7. The Regional District supports the development of a railway station in Seton Portage, including tourist accommodation and limited commercial, on a site specific rezoning basis. 8.8. The Regional District supports the creation of a regional transit system that connects communities throughout the SLRD.

LAND USE DESIGNATIONS

Within the plan area there are eight land use designations:

1. Residential 5. Resort Commercial 2. Rural Residential 6. Agriculture 3. Resource Management 7. Community Watershed 4. Commercial 8. Park

In the following sections, general policies are described for each land use designation. The sub-are plans contain additional community-specific policies addressing these same land use designations. There are no lands within Electoral Area B designated as Industrial, however, policy direction is provided for industrial proposals that come forward in the future.

9. RESIDENTIAL AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL

Context

The District of Lillooet is the main service centre for residents of Electoral Area B, and is the preferred location for small lot and urban-style residential development. The District of Lillooet updated its OCP in 2008. The OCP states that vacant lands found within the District are sufficient to meet the projected housing demand for both the short term and the long term (e.g. for 50 years at 10 units/year). The OCP emphasizes infill and the intensification of land use in order to make efficient use of existing infrastructure and to reduce the environmental and financial costs of growth.

There are three communities within Electoral Area B that have lands designated as Residential: Pavilion Lake, Fountain, and Seton Portage. There are approximately fifty small parcels of land (0.1 to 1.4 hectares) on two bays of Pavilion Lake. The majority of these parcels are roughly 0.3 hectares in size and developed with seasonal-use cottages. There are also approximately ten full time residents on Pavilion Lake. Fountain has fourteen smaller parcels (0.3 to two hectares) adjacent to Fountain Lake. These residential lots have been developed with small homes very close to the lake, which has caused some concern over impacts to water quality and the riparian area. In Seton Portage, there are 70 small lots (0.1

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 145 of 323 APRIL 2009 to 0.7 hectares) and a dozen larger parcels (4 hectares on average) within the village area. Community specific policies addressing the Residential land use designation are contained in the Pavilion Lake and Seton Portage sub-area plans.

There is one community within Electoral Area B that has lands designated as Rural Residential, and that is Seton Portage. Community specific policies addressing the Rural Residential land use designation are contained in the Seton Portage sub-area plan.

Within Electoral Area B the price of land has seen a slow increase over the last decade; however, the region remains one of the most affordable in southern British Columbia. There is no indication of a lack of supply for large rural parcels; however, small parcels that command a lower price (less than $100,000) are relatively scarce. This lack of small rural parcels has contributed to the perception of the region as not being exceptionally affordable. However, encouraging an additional supply of small (less than one hectare) parcels in rural areas, is not consistent with Smart Growth principles, and is generally not supported. This type of development should be directed to the District of Lillooet to encourage compact communities that limit the human footprint on the land.

The 2008 District of Lillooet OCP labels 34 hectares of land on the southwest boundary of the District (within Electoral Area B) as Special Area #1. These lands are located within the T’it’q’et IR 1, near existing band housing. (The SLRD does not do land use planning for IR lands.) The Lillooet OCP describes Special Areas as those lands that are recognized for their future growth potential. Special Area #1 is identified as a location that could potentially provide an opportunity for T’it’q’et IR 1 to grow and develop over time.

A need for additional residential lands associated with IRs has also been identified in other areas of Electoral Area B. The Xalip Band in Fountain has reported the need to develop agricultural lands for housing, due to a growing population and lack of other suitable lands.

Requests for additional Residential designated lands were not received as part of the OCP process.

Objectives

To ensure future development is consistent with the existing rural and semi-rural character of the area. To facilitate provision of an adequate supply of land for residential development, where it is consistent with Smart Growth principles and the desires of the community.

Policies

9.1. Lands designated for residential development are indicated on Map 5 - 8 as Residential and Rural Residential. 9.2. Permitted uses in all Residential and Rural Residential areas are single family home, secondary suite, home-based business, and auxiliary buildings and uses related to the above. 9.3. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Environment to establish a no-shooting reserve closure surrounding lands designated as Residential and Rural Residential. 9.4. A high standard of energy efficiency for all new residential construction is encouraged: a) Consideration shall be given to incorporating energy efficiency objectives into zoning amendment bylaws;

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 146 of 323 APRIL 2009

b) Density bonusing may be considered where alternative energy systems or other innovative sustainability initiatives are proposed. 9.5. Subdivisions to create lots accessible by water only are discouraged. 9.6. The Regional District encourages local First Nations and the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs to develop IRs in manner that reflects Smart Growth principles, including mixed use neighbourhoods, multi-family housing, and other initiatives to foster a level of density that is supportive of public transit.

Residential Development in Fountain, Pavilion Lake, and Seton Portage 9.7. The creation of additional waterfront parcels on Fountain and Pavilion lakes is not supported, including those lands designated as Residential. 9.8. The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure consistency with the OCP regarding policies within the Residential land use designation, particularly regarding minimum parcel size and land use on Fountain and Pavilion Lakes.

For additional policies on the Residential and Rural Residential land use designation, including minimum parcel sizes, see the Pavilion Lake Sub-area Plan and the Seton Portage Sub-area Plan.

10. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Context

The vast majority of Electoral Area B is designated as Resource Management. The Resource Management designation and policies are intended to guide development in ‘non-settlement areas,’ as defined in the SLRD Regional Growth Strategy. The Resource Management policies are also intended provide guidance for informed responses to referrals from provincial agencies and adjacent municipalities.

Much of the land and natural resource management that occurs within Electoral Area B is governed by the draft Lillooet Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP). The St’át’imc Preliminary Draft Land Use Plan provides another layer of information to guide resource management in Electoral Area B. The policies below are intended to reflect the St’át’imc vision and principles for the St’át’imc territory and the general policy directions provided by the LRMP.

The draft LRMP emphasizes economic growth for the region through mining and energy development on Crown lands. Mining opportunities within Electoral Area B include metals (gold, silver, copper, tungsten), industrial minerals (limestone, dimension stone, talc), aggregates (sand, gravel, crushed rock) and gems (jade, agate). The energy related policies contained within the LRMP emphasize the development of new or expanded energy infrastructure and improving access for exploration and development.

BC Hydro and the BC Transmission Corporation are two agencies that significantly shape the Resource Management lands within Electoral Area B. BC Hydro is working to implement the Province’s Energy Plan, which aims to maintain ninety per cent of all generation from ‘clean’ or renewable sources. Clean energy is defined as energy from alternative energy technologies that results in a net environmental improvement relative to existing energy production (e.g. hydroelectric, wind, solar, photovoltaic,

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 147 of 323 APRIL 2009 geothermal, tidal, wave and biomass energy, as well as cogeneration, energy from landfill gas, and municipal solid waste).

The SLRD in general, and Electoral Area B in particular, are strategically positioned to take advantage of opportunities presented by emerging technologies and opportunities for clean energy. These opportunities include small-scale hydroelectric generation facilities, solar, and wind energy production. The SLRD believes that where compatible with other community values, it is desirable to accommodate such energy projects under the Resource Management land use designation. However, it is also recognized that much of Electoral Area B is highly impacted by transmission lines and other energy and transportation related infrastructure. Given the high value placed on the scenic, rural character of Electoral Area B, and the growing tourism economy, these impacts need to be addressed in the planning stages of all energy development.

Hydroelectric power projects have had a major impact on Electoral Area B, particularly around Seton Portage. Hydroelectric facilities on the Bridge and Seton Rivers are the third largest in the province. Major transmission corridors within Electoral Area B include the west side of Anderson Lake, the north and south shores of Seton Lake, along Highway 99 from Lillooet north to Pavilion, and through the Fountain Valley. Significant corridors lacking transmission lines include the Duffey Lake Corridor, along the Fraser River south of Lillooet, the Bridge River Valley downstream of the Carpenter Reservoir, and the Yalakom Valley.

Residents of Electoral Area B have expressed a strong desire to see further impacts from energy generation projects limited, and a comprehensive sub-regional plan for independent power projects (IPP) developed. Applications for IPPs within Electoral B, and the accompanying approval process, have generated a great deal of concern that existing transmission line free corridors will be impacted, environmental impacts are not well understood, and community benefits are not realized.

Section 877(1) of the Local Government Act stipulates that an OCP must include statements and map designations respecting the approximate location and area of sand and gravel deposits that are suitable for future sand and gravel extraction. This information is not available for the Electoral Area B, however, it is acknowledged that sand and gravel extraction are permitted uses throughout the Resource Management land use designation.

In several Electoral Area B communities, the inability to accommodate more than two homes for family members on large rural properties is viewed as problematic. Where the subdivision potential of the land is limited due to the RR3 zone (40 hectare minimum parcel size), the zoning bylaw permits a maximum of two homes on parcels over eight hectares. In some areas, this restriction on subdivision and the number of dwellings has prompted the un-permitted construction of homes in order to accommodate children and grandchildren on a single property. The proposed solution is a revision of the zoning bylaw to permit up to four homes on properties 40 hectares or greater.

Permitting additional homes on properties smaller than 40 hectares across Electoral Area B is not generally supported. In the SLRD’s Electoral Area C, where four homes are permitted on Resource Management zoned properties 8 hectares or larger, this policy has resulted in a large rural strata subdivision in a location that does not meet Smart Growth criteria for development. In Electoral Area B, where families desire to construct additional homes on a property beyond what the zoning bylaw allows, the land owner is encouraged to seek a rezoning if appropriate, or construct the permitted secondary suites.

Significant potential for further subdivision of larger ‘Resource Management’ parcels does exist within Electoral Area B, particularly on those lands zoned RR2 (8 hectare minimum parcel size) in Bylaw 670.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 148 of 323 APRIL 2009

Rezoning of large rural properties in the RR3 zone (40 hectare minimum parcel size) to permit further subdivision is not generally consistent with Smart Growth principles and does result in some negative outcomes. Subdividing large rural acreages to create rural residential subdivisions decreases the potential for the land to operate as a viable farm unit or otherwise act as an income generating parcel. Subdivision increases the number of roads, houses, garbage, fences, cars, and pets, which all have a negative impact on wildlife. Subdivisions effectively decrease the wildlife habitat potential of the land. Subdivisions in rural areas increase the number of people who drive long distances to work, school, recreation, and shopping. This does not contribute to the community’s goal of decreasing green house gas emissions by limiting car travel. Additionally, rural subdivisions can be expensive to maintain. The cost of road maintenance in large lot subdivisions can be very high because there are more kilometres of road per person. In some cases, if the cost of future road surface replacement is factored in to those maintenance costs, the building and maintenance of the road is simply not economically feasible.

Generally speaking, Smart Growth principles advocate for accommodating the growing population in well-designed, urban communities with a small footprint, where people can walk and cycle for daily transportation, and in doing this, limit our impact on the environment and preserve rural areas as working landscapes and wildlife refuges. In light of this, the provision of residential or rural residential lots is encouraged within the District of Lillooet and in Seton Portage, rather than in remote areas.

Objective

To promote the management of land and water resources that respects the social and environmental values of the community, and protects biodiversity.

Policies

10.1.Sustainable natural resource use compatible with the social and environmental values of the community is encouraged on lands designated as Resource Management, as indicated on Maps 5 - 9. 10.2.Permitted uses on Resource Management lands are residential, agriculture, resource extraction (including aggregates), silviculture, dispersed outdoor recreation7, and ancillary uses related to these activities. 10.3.Industrial uses that have strong linkages to resource use activities that are primarily conducted outdoors, require a land area of one hectare or more, and may be incompatible with settlement uses or industry located within the District of Lillooet, may be permitted on a site specific rezoning basis on lands designated as Resource Management. 10.4.In all Resource Management areas of the plan, the minimum parcel area shall be forty hectares. 10.5.The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure consistency with the Resource Management land use designation policies, particularly regarding minimum parcel area.

Commercial Backcountry Recreation 10.6.Small-scale facilities for non-motorized backcountry recreation, including campgrounds, or small backcountry cabins (less than 60 m2), shall be considered consistent with the Resource Management

7 Dispersed outdoor recreation means recreation that generally occurs throughout a large area and is not confined to a specific place, such as hiking, primitive camping, hunting, fishing, horseback riding, and cross-country skiing.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 149 of 323 APRIL 2009

land use designation. These facilities should not be located where they will infringe upon the public enjoyment of key natural features and popular backcountry destinations, such as waterfront locations. 10.7.Backcountry tourism guest staging8 (for motorized commercial recreation) shall be considered consistent with the Resource Management land use designation where 1) no building over 10 m2 is constructed; 2) the staging area is not within 1000 meter of a residence, except a residence on the same parcel; and, 3) the staging area is not located on lands that have been identified as culturally or environmentally sensitive. Commercial recreation operators seeking to establish facilities for motorized commercial recreation may apply for rezoning of the property. 10.8.The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure consistency with the Resource Management land use designation policies, particularly regarding small-scale facilities for non-motorized backcountry recreation and backcountry tourism guest staging for motorized commercial recreation.

Duffey Lake Corridor The Duffy Lake Corridor is a very popular recreation area for local communities, residents of the lower mainland and beyond, and an important resource management area, particularly for forestry and wildlife. The corridor is located in both Electoral Areas B and C of the Regional District. It is approximately 100 kilometres long and runs from Lillooet Lake east of Pemberton, through the Coast Mountain Range, and down the Cayoosh Creek valley to the District of Lillooet. The road elevation varies from several hundred meters at Lillooet Lake to 1300 meters at the summit. The corridor passes through the biogeoclimatic transition zone between the wet coastal climate and the dry interior climate in the lee of the Coast Mountains.

In 1860, James Duffey of the Royal Engineers explored the corridor between Port Pemberton and Cayoosh (as Lillooet was then known) under the orders of Governor James Douglas. Duffey Lake was later named after him. A gold discovery in the Cayoosh Creek canyon in 1897 led to development of the then famous Golden Cache Mine. During the 1960s, logging roads were built from the north and the south to access the area’s timber resources. These logging roads were eventually connected and the route was opened to the public in 1972. In 1990-91 the road was upgraded, paved, and designated Highway 99.

Specific to the Duffy Lake Corridor, the policies of this OCP are intended to:

1. Support a variety of uses within the corridor, including public and commercial recreation, and sustainable resource management for wildlife habitat, timber harvesting and mining (as per the Lillooet and Sea to Sky Land and Resource Management Plans); 2. Ensure that sufficient opportunities exist for non-commercial recreational activities; 3. To encourage residential, industrial, and commercial development to locate in adjacent communities, except for development directly related to the forestry, mining, and recreation resource base of the corridor; 4. To recognize the scenic values of the corridor; and 5. To support protection of environmentally significant areas, avoidance of habitat loss, and maintenance of biological diversity.

8 ‘Backcountry tourism guest staging’ means commercial use of land that is subject to a commercial recreation tenure issued by the Province of British Columbia to congregate paying guests for the purpose of facilitating motorized open land recreation, including but not limited to helicopter accessed recreation, all-terrain vehicle tours, jet boating, and snowmobiling.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 150 of 323 APRIL 2009

Policies: 10.9.The Duffey Lake Corridor shall be retained in a largely undeveloped state and preserved for backcountry recreation and wildlife habitat. 10.10. If approved though the provincial Crown land tenure process and/or zoning amendment process, small-scale commercial facilities for backcountry recreation or the travelling public shall be constructed in manner that prevents negative visual impacts along Highway 99.

Provincial Agency Communications 10.11. The SLRD encourages collaborative planning and decision making with all provincial ministries and licensees to ensure that operational plans, prescriptions, permits, and tenures contain provisions that will minimize adverse effects of resource use on adjacent communities (e.g. risk of flooding, debris flow, landslide, or erosion on downstream settlement areas, deteriorated water quality in domestic water supplies, deteriorated visual quality, noise pollution, et cetera). 10.12. The Integrated Land Management Bureau is encouraged to dispose of Crown land for residential, commercial, or industrial development only in locations that are consistent with the policies and designations of this plan and the SLRD Regional Growth Strategy. 10.13. The Regional District shall work with provincial ministries to identify and make possible the siting of municipal/regional infrastructure on Crown land to serve community and economic development needs throughout the plan area, where such infrastructure can appropriately co-exist with other resource and environmental values. 10.14. The Ministry of Forests and Range is encouraged to complete an update of the visual quality inventory for the plan area to reflect its very high visual sensitivity and the strong emphasis on retaining wilderness values and promoting tourism. 10.15. The Regional District encourages the Integrated Land Management Bureau to update the LRMP to include all areas visible from Highway 99 within Visual Management Zone A, so that it will be managed under provisions of the Forest and Range Practices Act as a known scenic area with established visual quality objectives9.

Hydroelectric Generation and Independent Power Projects 10.16. The Ministry of Energy, Mines, and Petroleum Resources is encouraged to carry out a study of the cumulative effects of IPPs in Electoral Area B and develop a sub-regional energy plan. 10.17. The Regional District encourages B.C. Hydro and the British Columbia Transmission Corporation to not permit the construction of transmission lines within significant transmission line free corridors, including the Duffey Lake Corridor, along the Fraser River south of Lillooet, the Bridge River Valley down stream of the Carpenter Reservoir, and the Yalakom Valley.

9 Visual Quality Objective: the degree of acceptable alteration from the characteristic visual landscape, as determined by the Ministry of Forests and Range, which is used as a basis for deciding what forest harvesting and silviculture activities are recommended in an area.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 151 of 323 APRIL 2009

10.18. The development of small hydroelectric facilities is considered to be consistent with the Resource Management land use designation where they are shown to be compatible with adjacent land uses, technically sound, environmentally responsible, socially responsible, and licensable.

11. AGRICULTURE

Context

The preservation of agricultural land and the promotion of farming are integral to the well-being of Electoral Area B residents, and the region as a whole, by creating food security. Food security can be defined as a situation in which:

1. the community has assured access to adequate and appropriate food; 2. farmers and others working in the food industry are able to earn a living wage by growing, producing, processing, handling, retailing and serving food; and, 3. the quality of land, air, and water are maintained and enhanced for future generations.

Those lands with agricultural potential within Electoral Area B are primarily located on the benches above the Fraser River and in the neighbourhoods of Texas Creek, Fountain, Pavilion Lake, West Pavilion, and the Yalakom Valley. The majority of these lands, with the exception of the Yalakom Valley, are designated as Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR). ALR lands are regulated by the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC). The mandate of the ALC is to preserve agricultural land and encourage the establishment and maintenance of farms. In general, lands within Electoral Area B that are designated as Agriculture in this OCP coincide with ALR lands.

Ranching, haying, and gardening are the primary agricultural activities within Electoral Area B. Ginseng and hops are grown is some areas, and trials are underway in the Lillooet area to assess the feasibility of the region for growing wine grapes. Agritourism is largely undeveloped in Electoral Area B.

Objectives

To contribute to local and regional food security. To preserve the agricultural land base in the plan area. To encourage diversification and economic sustainability of the farming community. To minimize the impacts from non-agricultural development occurring at the edge of farming areas and within agricultural lands. To balance the interests of agriculture and protection of the environment.

Policies

Agricultural Land Base (Land Use) 11.1.Lands designated for agricultural use are indicated on Maps 5 and 6 as Agriculture. These lands shall be managed to retain their agricultural potential. Permitted uses are defined by the Agricultural Land Commission, including agriculture, farm retail sales, agritourism, sand and gravel extraction, residential, small hydroelectric facilities, and auxiliary uses related to these activities. 11.2.Non-farm residential, recreational, institutional, industrial, commercial uses, utility facilities, and urban developments are encouraged to occur in locations that will not impact the viability of farm land.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 152 of 323 APRIL 2009

11.3.Subdivision and exclusion of land from the Agricultural Land Reserve is discouraged. 11.4.The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure consistency with the Agriculture land use designation policies, particularly regarding minimum parcel area. 11.5.Paved and unpaved helipads and airstrips are discouraged on agricultural lands. 11.6.In order to limit the fragmentation of multi-parcel farm operations by the sale of individual parcels, the SLRD will work collaboratively with farm property owners and their agents, and the Agricultural Land Commission on a case by case basis to reconcile potentially conflicting interests. 11.7.The owners of agricultural lands are encouraged to facilitate the use of the land for agriculture by actively farming or leasing or loaning their lands to persons that would undertake active farming. 11.8.Non-farm uses on agricultural land, or non-soil dependent farm operations, are encouraged to locate in areas of poorer soils.

Economic Sustainability 11.9.The Regional District encourages economic diversification initiatives accessory to and compatible with farming that add value to locally produced farm products by: a) Supporting the development of farm outlets for the sale of local agricultural products; b) Permitting roadside stands for farm gate sales of agricultural products; c) Permitting bed and breakfasts in agricultural areas and guest houses/small scale agritourism operations that feature farm vacations and farming related activities; and, d) Support home occupations that produce value added products from locally produced agricultural products. 11.10. Agritourism accommodation to a maximum of 10 sleeping units per farm operation will be considered to be consistent with the Agriculture land use designation. Applications for agritourism accommodation will be considered on a site specific rezoning basis.

Agriculture Interface 11.11. Normal farm practices with possible undesirable side effects, such as odours, machinery and animal noises, and blowing dust, are to be expected in an agricultural area. In the case of conflict between a farm operation carrying on normal farm practices and adjacent non-farm development, the agricultural interest will be supported. 11.12. Future development activities in the plan area shall result in minimal creation of new residential- agriculture interfaces. Development and subdivisions at the residential - farm land interface shall be planned and mitigated as follows: a) no road endings shall abut the ALR boundary, b) the ALR – residential boundary shall be fenced and buffered as per the Agricultural Land Commission’s Landscaped Buffer Specifications, and, c) Building setbacks and other mitigations will be considered as per the Ministry of Agriculture and Land’s Guide to Edge Planning. 11.13. Agricultural Impact Assessments should be considered to measure the impacts of a proposed major rezoning, subdivision, or non-farm use on the ALR or farmed lands. Mitigation should be required for identified impacts.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 153 of 323 APRIL 2009

Housing 11.14. As per the Agricultural Land Commission Act and regulations, additional dwellings are permitted where necessary for farm use, provided: a) The property has farm classification under the Assessment Act; and, b) Supportive comments from the Regional Agrologist with the Ministry of Agriculture have been received.

Environmental Protection 11.15. Farm operations that sustain both farming and wildlife, protect against soil erosion and degradation, and maintain water quality and hydrological functions are supported. 11.16. Farmers are encouraged to prepare Environmental Farm Plans.10 11.17. To promote the long term sustainability of agricultural production, ecosystem integrity, and human health, land use decision making shall apply the precautionary principle: When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically, and in this context, the proponent of an activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof.

12. COMMERCIAL AND RESORT COMMERCIAL

Context

The District of Lillooet is the primary commercial centre servicing Electoral Area B residents. Seton Portage provides a second, smaller commercial centre to serve residents in the western part of the electoral area. In the vicinity of Pavilion Lake, the Ts’ay’laxw Nation has plans to reconstruct a commercial node at the old store site near the foot of the Clinton-Pavilion Road. The Ts’ay’laxw Nation is also redeveloping the Sky Blue Water Resort on Pavilion Lake. Small home-based businesses and resource-based industries are situated throughout the electoral area.

There is one community within Electoral Area B that has lands designated as Commercial, and that is Seton Portage. Community specific policies addressing the Commercial land use designation are contained in the Seton Portage Sub-area Plan.

Pavilion Lake is the only community within Electoral Area B that has lands designated as Resort Commercial. Policies addressing the Resort Commercial land use designation, and more specifically the Sky Blue Water Resort, are contained in the Pavilion Lake Sub-area Plan.

10 Environmental Farm Plans are assessments voluntarily prepared by farm families to increase their environmental awareness in a variety of different areas on their farm. Farmers highlight their operation's environmental strengths, identify areas of environmental concern, and set realistic action plans with time tables to improve environmental conditions. Provincial funding may be available.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 154 of 323 APRIL 2009

The 2008 District of Lillooet OCP identifies lands on the southwest boundary of the District, within Electoral Area B and also within the boundaries of an IR, as Special Area # 5. While local governments do not have land use planning authority within IRs, the District of Lillooet OCP recognizes these lands for their potential as a commercial node or resort opportunity. Special Area #5 is located at the gateway to Lillooet and ‘offers prime development opportunities associated with the attractive natural setting and the highway corridor.’

Requests for additional Commercial or Resort Commercial designated lands were not received as part of the OCP process.

Objectives

To support the District of Lillooet as the commercial centre for the plan area. To create a viable village center in Seton Portage that serves as a focal point for residents and tourists. To support home-based businesses.

Policies

12.1.Lands designated for commercial development are indicated on Maps 6 - 8 as Commercial or Resort Commercial. 12.2.Permitted uses on Commercial lands are restaurants, retail stores, tourist accommodation, offices, clinics, and other personal service businesses compatible with adjacent land uses, as well as auxiliary uses related to the above. 12.3.First Nations economic development initiatives that reflect the community’s values are supported, including the following proposed commercial nodes (both located within IRs): a) the old store site near the foot of the Clinton-Pavilion Road (Pavilion IR), b) lands on the southwest boundary of the District (Lillooet IR). 12.4.Where local First Nations and the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs propose to develop commercial nodes, the Regional District encourages public consultation, retaining a vegetated buffer along Highway 99, and adherence to applicable Smart Growth principles (mixed-use neighbourhoods and other initiatives to support the use of public transit). 12.5.A high standard of energy efficiency for all new commercial construction or renovations is encouraged: a) Consideration shall be given to incorporating energy efficiency objectives into zoning amendment bylaws; b) Density bonusing may be considered where alternative energy systems or other innovative sustainability initiatives are proposed.

13. INDUSTRIAL

Context

Within Electoral Area B there are no lands designated as Industrial. Existing industrial-type operations are conducted as home industries or are resource-based and permitted under the Resource Management

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 155 of 323 APRIL 2009 designation. Requests for additional Industrial designated lands were not received as part of the OCP process.

Objectives

To support the District of Lillooet as the industrial centre for the plan area. To provide a process for accommodating future industrial land use where appropriate, and to promote the wise use of industrial lands.

Policies

13.1.The Regional District encourages industrial uses to locate within the District of Lillooet. 13.2.Rezoning to Industrial may be considered where there is a clear benefit to the community, the land is separated from residential uses, and the activities will not negatively impact the community. 13.3.Applications for industrial development shall be accompanied by a proposal and concept plan addressing such matters as water usage, environmental protection, landscaping, buffering, access, servicing, reclamation, and any other matters deemed necessary by the Regional District.

14. INSTITUTIONAL

Context

Within Electoral Area B, there is one parcel of land in Seton Portage designated as Institutional. This parcel is the site of the community’s fire hall. Other institutional land uses (schools, clinics, ambulance stations, et cetera) are located within the District of Lillooet or on IRs. Requests for additional Institutional designated lands were not received as part of the OCP process.

Objectives

To support the development of lands for institutional use where appropriate. To promote the health and safety of residents and visitors by encouraging the improvement of medical services and fire and police protection. To foster cooperation among all agencies involved in planning for community services.

Policies

14.1.The Regional District recognizes the statutory responsibilities of federal and provincial government agencies and will work with these agencies to facilitate the provision of services, including health care, policing, emergency services, and road maintenance. 14.2.In support of the goals of achieving carbon neutral local government operations by 2020, a high standard of energy efficiency for all new institutional buildings or renovations is encouraged.

15. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA

Context

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 156 of 323 APRIL 2009 water quality objectives and additional regulation of forest practices to prevent long-term changes to background water quality, quantity, and timing of flow. Within Electoral Area B, there are three provincially recognized community watersheds: one west of Lillooet, one in the Fountain Valley, and a small watershed near Seton Portage. These watersheds are designated as Community Watershed Protection Areas in the OCP.

Outside of the provincially recognized community watersheds, two other areas have been identified as good candidates for protection under the Forests and Range Practices Act. These areas include the larger watershed surrounding the community of Seton Portage and the drainage area for Pavilion Lake. Although they are not provincially recognized, these watersheds are also designated as Community Watershed Protection Areas in the OCP.

Objectives

To recognize the importance of water resources and protect and improve the quality and quantity of those resources for future generations. To ensure development activities within Electoral Area B support the protection of community watersheds.

Policies

15.1.The Community Watershed Protection Areas, as indicated on Maps 5 to 9, are those areas where the primary land management priority is to maintain local water quality. 15.2.Permitted uses within Community Watershed Protection Areas are appropriately managed resource extraction, dispersed outdoor recreation, and auxiliary uses related to these activities. 15.3.Intensive recreation, subdivision, and rezoning of lands within Community Watershed Protection Areas shall be discouraged. Recreationalists are encouraged to minimize stream crossings and stay on existing trails to prevent erosion. 15.4.The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range to ensure that forest practices within community watersheds are conducted in accordance with the applicable regulations. 15.5.Community groups or individuals are encouraged to apply for formal protection of those Community Watershed Protection Areas that are not recognized under the Forests and Range Practices Act.

16. PARK

Context

The Regional District’s park function consists of taking ownership of land through the park dedication process at the time of subdivision or collecting funds in-lieu. No regional parks have yet been established. Electoral Area B residents access park facilities within the District of Lillooet or amenities provided by the province through the provincial parks system, forest recreation sites administered by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and the Arts, and private and Crown lands. Provincial parks include Duffey Lake Park, Marble Canyon Park, Edge Hills, and the Seton Portage Historic Park. The draft Lillooet LRMP proposes a 2,300 hectare extension to the Marble Canyon Park and potentially new parks at, Cerise Creek, Fred and Antoine Creeks, and the Yalakom Creek – Nile Mile Ridge.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 157 of 323 APRIL 2009

Electoral Area B is home to an extensive network of trails and recreation sites (see Map 10). Many of these features are well used by locals and visitors, but are not officially recognized by provincial ministries or licensees.

As part of the OCP process, no requests were received for the SLRD to establish a regional park or a recreation or commuter trail network. Funding for these types of services would be generated through an additional property tax funded service area.

Objective

To satisfy the recreation needs of residents and visitors by ensuring that land is provided for community parks and recreation areas and by encouraging effective management.

Policies

16.1.Lands designated for recreation use and environmental conservation are indicated on Maps 5 - 8 as Park. 16.2.Where park dedication is required at the time of subdivision, the dedication of land shall be pursued where possible, rather than cash-in-lieu. 16.3.Future subdivision of waterfront properties shall favor the public use of the waterfront to the greatest extent possible through the provision of open space. 16.4.Where possible, parks shall be planned, designed, and maintained to provide for fire protection and mitigation. 16.5.The Regional District encourages the responsible provincial agencies to effectively maintain Park land under their jurisdiction. 16.6.The Regional District encourages the responsible provincial agencies to improve information and interpretive signage emphasizing recreational opportunities. 16.7.The Regional District supports the development of a joint comprehensive trails strategy for Electoral Area B and the District of Lillooet.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 158 of 323 APRIL 2009

PAVILION LAKE SUB-AREA PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ...... 39

GUIDING PRINCIPLES ...... 39 COMMUNITY POLICIES...... 40

1. GENERAL ...... 40 2. PUBLIC ACCESS...... 40 3. IMPLEMENTATION ...... 41 LAND USE DESIGNATION POLICIES...... 41

4. RESIDENTIAL ...... 41 5. RESORT COMMERCIAL ...... 42 6. AGRICULTURE...... 42 7. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA ...... 43 8. PARK...... 43

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 159 of 323 APRIL 2009

INTRODUCTION

Pavilion Lake is a physical feature, a geographic location, a human settlement, a cultural landscape, and a spiritual homeland. It attracts swimmers, divers, boaters, fishing enthusiasts, and naturalists, and supports unique ecological features, such as some of the world’s largest freshwater microbiolites (coral-like sedimentary structures formed by algal mat organisms). The lake is also licensed as a water supply for the Diamond S Ranch, a historically significant agricultural operation that covers hundreds of acres near the northern boundary of the plan area. Steep limestone walls and forested hillsides surrounding Pavilion Lake create an impressive canyon that provides outstanding rock and ice climbing opportunities, a natural canvas for remarkable displays of sunlight and shadows, and a sense of calm seclusion.

The plan area (see Map 6) falls within the traditional territory of the Ts’kw’aylaxw people, who are part of the Secwepemc (Shuswap) and St'át'imc (Interior Salish) Nations. The Ts’kw’aylaxw own and operate the Sky Blue Water Resort, a collection of rustic lakefront cabins and facilities for recreational tourists. They also own and have plans to redevelop the site of the former Pavilion General store, which falls outside the plan area, but will serve local residents and visitors.

Pavilion’s history of non-indigenous uses began when roads and railway lines linking the BC interior plateau to the Fraser Canyon and the coast were built through the area. These transportation corridors engendered roadhouses, early settlement, and some of BC’s first large ranches. Today, Pavilion Lake is home to a small community of year-round residents, and is a destination for many more seasonal residents, tourists, and recreational visitors. Two areas of settlement along the northern shore of the lake are best described as small-lot residential subdivisions with permanent and semi-permanent dwellings.

Existing and proposed parks cover most of the plan area. In April 2001 local ecological, recreational, and cultural attributes were officially recognised and protected through the addition of Pavilion Lake to Marble Canyon Provincial Park. The Lillooet Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) anticipates further expansion of the park boundaries. Communication and cooperation between the SLRD and the Ministry of Environment is thus a key element in any land use decisions for Pavilion Lake.

The community of Pavilion Lake is not large, nor is it experiencing notable growth. The prospect of significant development pressure within the plan area is remote. To reflect the local context, this sub-area plan covers a small geographic area, it addresses a limited range of local issues, it is restricted in its scope to a short list of basic planning principles, land use designations, and policies, and it has a simple goal:

‘To preserve the natural and scenic characteristics of Pavilion Lake, and respect the quiet, rural lifestyle enjoyed by the community of permanent and seasonal residents who live in the area.’

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Any future development in the plan area must be incremental, carefully considered, and only permitted to the extent that it reflects and supports the principles of this plan. These principles include:

a. Pavilion Lake is part of the Ts’kw’aylaxw Nation traditional territory. It’s spiritual and cultural significance to local indigenous people must be respected. b. The ecological integrity of Pavilion Lake is a key community priority. c. The quality and quantity of the local water supply must be protected. d. Existing water tenures must be recognized, respected, and preserved.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 160 of 323 APRIL 2009

e. Public access to Pavilion Lake should be managed to allow for recreational use by locals and visitors while minimising conflicts with adjacent landowners. f. Community planning will respect and support Ministry of Environment management directions for the Marble Canyon Provincial Park.

The remainder of the plan is divided into two sections: community policies and land use designation policies.

COMMUNITY POLICIES

1. GENERAL

Policies

1.1. The Regional District will work with landowners to identify local land use issues and develop practical strategies to address these issues. 1.2. The Regional District will consider the adoption of a new zoning bylaw for Pavilion Lake that complements the policies of this Official Community Plan and is more specific to the local context than the existing zoning (SLRD Bylaw 670). 1.3. The Regional District will communicate with the Ministry of Environment to ensure that local government land use decisions are consistent with park management objectives. 1.4. The Regional District supports the Ts’kw’aylaxw Nation’s plans to redevelop a commercial node at District Lot DL 89 (Although District Lot 89 falls outside the sub-plan area, proposed facilities are expected to meet future demands for neighbourhood commercial services.) 1.5. Industrial development is not considered appropriate within the plan area. Proponents of industrial activity will be encouraged to seek alternative locations. 1.6. In conjunction with the community and provincial agencies, the Regional District supports the development of a recreation management plan for Pavilion Lake, addressing motorized recreation, public access, dock construction, campgrounds, water quality, and wildlife habitat.

2. PUBLIC ACCESS

The areas identified on Map 6 as ‘public access’ are existing public rights-of-way that enable visitors and locals to reach the lake without crossing private land. These areas encourage equal access to all public access points in order to reduce the potential impacts of intensive use.

Policies

2.1. All existing public road rights of way should be equally accessible and available for use by residents and visitors, assuming site specific approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. 2.2. The Regional District will work with the Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, and local residents to provide appropriate signage and maintenance of ‘public access’ areas.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 161 of 323 APRIL 2009

3. IMPLEMENTATION

Policies

3.1. To ensure consistency with the goal and principles of the sub-area plan, the following implementation measures are adopted: a. The Pavilion Lake Sub-area Plan will be distributed to local First Nations and provincial agencies for reference. b. The Pavilion Lake Sub-area Plan will be available to property owners and local residents for reference. c. If requested by the Ministry of Environment, the Regional District will participate actively in Park Management discussions. d. The Regional District will consider amending Zoning Bylaw 670 to more accurately reflect the land use priorities of the Pavilion Lake community. e. Community Plan amendments will be considered in consultation with local residents and property owners, the Ts’kw’aylaxw Nation, and provincial agencies. f. The SLRD will review the Pavilion Lake Sub-area Plan within five years of adoption.

LAND USE DESIGNATION POLICIES

This section describes the five land use designations within the plan area. The boundaries of these land use designations are outlined on Map 6.

4. RESIDENTIAL

The Residential designation applies to fee simple lands surrounding the lake, including settled small-lot subdivisions and larger undeveloped parcels. The goal of the Residential designation is to accommodate development of a form, density, and location that meets future housing needs without compromising the rural character of the existing community.

Policies

4.1. The creation of additional waterfront parcels for residential use on Pavilion Lake is not supported. 4.2. The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure consistency with the OCP regarding policies within the Residential land use designation, particularly regarding minimum parcel size and land use on Pavilion Lake.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 162 of 323 APRIL 2009

Number of Dwellings 4.3. The Regional District strongly discourages any further development of multiple dwellings on individual parcels; this type of development contravenes existing zoning, presents health and ecological concerns, and is not supported by the community. 4.4. The Regional District will work with local residents to achieve compliance with land use regulations regarding the number of dwellings on individual parcels. 4.5. The Regional District encourages owners of parcels with multiple dwelling units to consult with Interior Health to address local sewage disposal concerns. 4.6. Any future zoning changes should not allow more than 1 dwelling unit to be located on parcels that are smaller than 1 hectare. 4.7. Any future zoning changes should not allow more than 2 dwelling units to be located on parcels that are smaller than 1 hectare.

5. RESORT COMMERCIAL

The Resort Commercial designation applies to Sky Blue Water Resort. This designation supports the Ts’kw’aylaxw Nation’s continued ownership and operation of the resort, including potential future development to accommodate demand for recreational use and lake access.

Policies

5.1. New development at the Sky Blue Water Resort should be designed to reflect the principles contained within this plan, and the creation of these designs should involve the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure to ensure that proper traffic management plans and studies are in place. 5.2. Development that facilitates increased use of the Resort should adopt best practices for sewage treatment to minimize potential impacts on the lake ecology.

6. AGRICULTURE

All lands designated as Agriculture coincide with the boundaries of the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR). This designation includes two tracts of land on the northeast side of Pavilion Lake. Land within the ALR is regulated by the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC). The purpose of the ALC is first and foremost to preserve agricultural land in the province and encourage the establishment and maintenance of farms. Provisions of the Agricultural Land Commission Act take precedence over local government land use bylaws.

Policies

6.1. Land designated Agriculture is intended for agricultural uses. Agricultural uses include the growing, rearing, producing, and harvesting of agricultural products, the sale of agricultural products, agritourism activities, as well as greenhouses and nursery uses. 6.2. All uses and subdivision of land within the Agricultural Land Reserve shall be in accordance with the Agricultural Land Commission Act.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 163 of 323 APRIL 2009

6.3. To promote the sustainability of the agricultural community, exclusions from the Agricultural Land Reserve and further subdivision of lots within the Agricultural Land Reserve are generally not supported. 6.4. To protect the water quality of Pavilion Lake, agricultural practices should be compliant with provincial and federal acts and regulations.

7. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA

The Community Watershed Protection Area designation covers the rocky and forested slopes that rise to the northeast and southwest sides of the lake, to the height of land that forms the plan area boundary. This is intended to reflect the local importance of a safe drinking water supply by discouraging activities that could lead to the contamination of streams or groundwater. This watershed is not formally recognized under the Forests and Range Practices Act.

Policies

7.1. Land in the Community Watershed Protection Area designation should remain undeveloped. 7.2. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range to limit activities within this designated in order to protect scenic values, recreational potential, and water quality.

8. PARK

This designation applies to the Pavilion Lake addition to Marble Canyon Provincial Park. It is intended to support BC Parks in managing the sensitive environment and special features as described in the park’s Management Direction Statement.

Policies

8.1. The Regional District will cooperate with the Ministry of Environment to ensure that land uses adjacent to the park are consistent with park management objectives. 8.2. Public recreational use of Pavilion Lake should be managed to ensure that the ecological features and water quality of the lake are protected.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 164 of 323 APRIL 2009

SETON PORTAGE SUB-AREA PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ...... 45

PLAN AREA BOUNDARY ...... 45 GUIDING PRINCIPLES ...... 46 GENERAL PLAN AREA POLICIES ...... 46

1. COMMUNITY GROWTH AND CHARACTER...... 46 2. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ...... 47 3. COMMUNITY SERVICES ...... 47 4. INFRASTRUCTURE ...... 48 5. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING...... 48 LAND USE DESIGNATION POLICIES...... 49

6. RESIDENTIAL AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL...... 49 7. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ...... 49 8. COMMERCIAL...... 50 9. INDUSTRIAL ...... 50 10. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA ...... 50 11. PARK ...... 51

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 165 of 323 APRIL 2009

INTRODUCTION

Seton Portage is a small community of approximately 150 residents situated between Anderson and Seton Lakes. Adjacent to Seton Portage, on the northwest shore of Seton Lake, is the Shalalth Indian Reserve, home to more than 500 members of the Seton Lake Band. There are also a number of small settlements, lake-accessed properties, and agricultural operations, such as Ponderosa Ranch, bordering either side of Anderson and Seton Lakes. These are remote communities, accessible via D’Arcy and the Douglas Trail (Highline Road), or via Lillooet and the Mission Mountain Road and Highway 40.

The plan area is situated in the biogeoclimatic transition zone between the moist Coast Mountain environment and the drier climate of the Interior Plateau. The area is surrounded by steep mountain valleys. The land mass that is now the community of Seton Portage was formed some time between 8,000 and 20,000 years ago when a landslide came down from the surrounding peaks to create a blockage in what was once a single lake.

Within the plan area, there is evidence of human habitation dating back nearly 7000 years. The region was originally settled by the St'át'imc Nation, attracted by the mild climate and abundant fish and game. In the mid-1800s, spurred by both the Klondike and Cariboo gold rushes, Seton Portage functioned as a major transportation hub. Miners traveled along the historic Douglas Trail route, following Harrison, Lillooet and Anderson Lakes to Seton Portage, then on to Lillooet.

In the early part of the 20th Century, the area provided a transport linkage to the gold claims in Bralorne and Gold Bridge using the Mission Mountain route. At the same time, the Pacific Great Eastern Railway was constructed from D’Arcy to Lillooet, providing a new link between Seton Portage and the Lower Mainland. The next significant development for Seton Portage occurred with the construction of the Mission Mountain hydro-electric generation project in the 1950s. The Bridge River was dammed, creating the Carpenter Reservoir. Water from the reservoir was diverted into penstocks constructed under Mission Mountain, and finally released into Seton Lake after powering a series of large turbines.

Today, Seton Portage and the Anderson/Seton Lake area is still home to the Seton Lake Band, centred around the Shalalth community. A number of these people are still involved in traditional hunting, fishing, and trapping practices, serving as important reminders of the subsistence lifestyle that once dominated the region. Both the native and non-native population of the area is comprised of retirees, seasonal residents, and those employed in the tourism, agriculture, forestry, rail, and hydro sectors.

PLAN AREA BOUNDARY

The boundary for the Seton Portage Sub-Area Plan comprises a significant portion of SLRD Electoral Area B (See Maps 7 and 8). It includes the community of Seton Portage, the surrounding watershed, and most of the rural residential properties along Anderson and Seton Lakes. The plan area is bordered to the southwest by the Electoral Area C boundary near the southern tip of Anderson Lake, to the south by the height of watersheds that drain into Anderson and Seton Lakes, to the east by the extent of rural residential properties on Seton Lake and to the north by the Electoral Area A boundary.

The OCP was originally intended to focus on the community of Seton Portage, however many of the residents with fee simple and crown lease properties on Anderson and Seton Lakes expressed a desire to be included in the plan, as they share many similar land use concerns.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 166 of 323 APRIL 2009

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

The community of Seton Portage is not developing rapidly, nor is it expected to see significant development in the near future. Therefore the goal of the Seton Portage Sub-area Plan is:

‘To maintain the quiet, rural residential lifestyle of the Seton Portage, Shalalth, Anderson Lake, and Seton Lake communities, while providing for some low-impact development.’

The community of Seton Portage, property owners on Anderson and Seton Lakes, and the Regional Board are generally supportive of the following as common objectives to guide future development on both private and public land within the plan area:

a. To respect the spiritual and cultural significance of the traditional territory of the Seton Lake Band, which comprises a significant portion of the plan area. This includes following, as closely as possible, the recommendations put forward in the St’at’imc Draft Land Use Plan. b. To improve communications between the aboriginal and non-aboriginal communities in the plan area and between both of these groups and the Squamish Lillooet Regional District. c. To maintain legal, viable road access to the communities via the Highline Road/ Douglas Trail, Mission Mountain Road, and Highway 40. d. To secure public boat access to Anderson Lake at Seton Portage. e. To work with the Ministry of Forests and Range and BC Hydro to protect the area from the threat of wildfire, particularly in the urban/wildfire interface zone. f. To create and maintain a Bear Smart waste management system for the Seton Portage community. g. To work towards establishing an emergency response plan for the entire plan area, as part of the SLRD’s emergency plan. h. To promote the protection of ecological integrity throughout the plan area. i. To ensure the economic viability of the Seton Portage community. j. To maintain existing opportunities for additional rural residential development.

GENERAL PLAN AREA POLICIES

1. COMMUNITY GROWTH AND CHARACTER

Policies

1.1. The Regional District will work with landowners to identify local land use issues and develop practical strategies to address these issues. 1.2. The Regional District supports preservation initiatives for cultural and historical assets within the plan area. This includes potential heritage designations or an acknowledgement that certain areas need to remain undisclosed in order to maintain their preservation.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 167 of 323 APRIL 2009

1.3. The Regional District does not support the sale of vacant crown land for residential development within the plan area. 1.4. Any growth and development on private land within the community of Seton Portage should adhere to the principles of Smart Growth, specifically: a. Strengthen and direct development towards existing communities; and, b. Protect and preserve green space and sensitive areas. 1.5. Commercial and residential development that involves increased use of lakefront properties on either Anderson or Seton Lakes should adopt best practices for sewage treatment to minimize potential impacts on the ecology of the lakes. 1.6. The Regional District will work with the Ministry of Forests and Range to improve communication and education on forest fire hazards, particularly with respect to signage, the level of fire danger, and the appropriate periods for campfires. 1.7. Although the provincial Agricultural Land Reserve designation was removed from land around Seton Portage in 1986, the Regional District continues to support agricultural activities in this area. Agricultural uses include the growing, rearing, producing, and harvesting of agricultural products, the sale of agricultural products, agritourism activities, nurseries, and the use of greenhouses.

2. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Policies

2.1. The Regional District supports the return of passenger rail service to the communities of D’Arcy, Seton Portage, and Lillooet. 2.2. The Regional District will assist the community in attempting to secure the development of legal water access in the form of a beach, mooring, dock, and boat ramp on Anderson Lake close to Seton Portage. Water access onto Seton Lake is also a project supported by the Regional District. 2.3. In order to promote economic diversification and the development of the tourism industry, the Regional District will support the development of a strategy and infrastructure that will encourage low impact tourism activities that reflect the values of this plan. 2.4. The Regional District supports the development of home-based businesses and home-based industries that are self-contained, as a means to further promote economic diversity in the Seton Portage community. 2.5. The Regional District supports measures taken to ensure the sustainability and vitality of the economy in Seton Portage, as long as they do not create a negative aesthetic impact on the community.

3. COMMUNITY SERVICES

Policies

3.1. The Regional District will try to work with Chief and council of the Seton Lake Band and the community of Seton Portage to create a more effective communication link between the residents of the Seton Portage/ Shalalth area and the SLRD. The creation of a Local Community

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 168 of 323 APRIL 2009

Commission, as provided for in Section 838 of the Local Government Act, is a possible means to secure this link. 3.2. The Regional District will work with the community to establish more effective waste diversion mechanisms, including the potential provision of a recycling depot and by making household composters available to the community for purchase at a subsidized rate. 3.3. The Regional District will work with the Seton Fire Department to create some form of emergency planning for the plan area. This will follow the implementation of a 9-1-1 service across Electoral Areas A & B, and will likely be put forward in conjunction with the creation of an SLRD-wide Emergency Response Plan. 3.4. The Regional District will collaborate with School District #74 and local families to ensure the long-term viability of the existing Sk’il Mountain School. 3.5. If the opportunity presents itself, the Regional District will look to form new parks or create facilities within existing parks to provide for recreational amenities within the community of Seton Portage.

4. INFRASTRUCTURE

These policies apply to all existing access roads (Highline Road/ Douglas Trail, Mission Mountain Road), transmission lines, and trail corridors.

Policies

4.1. The Regional District will support community efforts to provide secure, year-round access to the community of Seton Portage via the Highline Road/Douglas Trail and the Mission Mountain Rd. 4.2. The Regional District will support lobbying of the Ministry of Forests and Range and the Ministry of Transportation to make certain that they follow their legislated obligations for maintenance of access roads. 4.3. The Regional District will support requests to the BC Transmission Corporation to follow through with its obligations to reduce the fire hazard under power lines by eliminating slash and debris piles. 4.4. The Regional District will support requests to the BC Transmission Corporation to ensure that power lines are not being used beyond their capacity and causing a potential hazard with excessive sagging. 4.5. The communities within the plan area support an extension of the proposed Sea to Sky Trail from Horseshoe Bay to D’Arcy through to Seton Portage and on to Lillooet. The route will provide recreational access through the area, following existing roadways and potential crown land trail easements. 4.6. The Regional District supports the provision of high-speed internet access to the community of Seton Portage.

5. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING

To ensure consistency with the goal and principles of the OCP, the following implementation measures are adopted:

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 169 of 323 APRIL 2009

5.1. The Seton Portage Sub-area Plan will be distributed to local First Nations and provincial agencies for reference, and will be made available to property owners and local residents. 5.2. Plan amendments will be considered in consultation with local residents and property owners, the Seton Lake Band, and provincial agencies.

LAND USE DESIGNATION POLICIES

This section describes the five land use designations within the plan area. The boundaries of these land use designations are outlined on Maps 7 and 8.

6. RESIDENTIAL AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL

Policies

6.1. Future development must be of a form, density, and location that meets future housing needs without compromising the rural character of the existing community. 6.2. Residential development will be discouraged in the urban/wildfire interface zone, or within areas that could be threatened in the event of significant forest fire activity. 6.3. The Regional District encourages owners of water-access lots on Anderson Lake to make legal arrangements for storage of cars and boat trailers in D’Arcy. 6.4. Subdivisions to create lots accessible by water only are discouraged. 6.5. Minimum residential lot sizes are applicable only to the extent that site specific environmental factors allow for, including slope and natural features, access to the site, and the ability to service a parcel with water and sewer.

Residential 6.6. The minimum lot size permitted for a newly created parcel on lands designated as Residential shall be 0.8 hectares. 6.7. Subdivision to create a distinct village core through parcels smaller than 0.8 hectares may be considered as part of a comprehensive planning/rezoning process.

Rural Residential 6.8. The minimum lot size permitted for a newly created parcel on lands designated as Rural Residential shall be 8 hectares.

7. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Policies

7.1. All crown land within the OCP area that is not an Indian Reserve or within the Community Watershed Protection Area designation, is designated Resource Management.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 170 of 323 APRIL 2009

7.2. The Regional District will work with the Ministry of Forests and Range to address the issue of increasing fuel load and fire hazard on Crown Land. 7.3. The Regional District will work with the Ministry of Forests and Range and the community of Seton Portage to address flood control and debris flow issues arising from the Whitecap Creek Fire of 2004 and any future significant forest fire activities.

8. COMMERCIAL

Policies

8.1. To contribute to the community’s economic vitality, additional development on Commercial designated parcels is supported.

9. INDUSTRIAL

Policies

9.1. There are no industrial designations within the Seton Portage and Anderson/Seton Lakes OCP. However, should an industrial development proposal come forward, it will be dealt with through a site specific rezoning process, including a public hearing.

10. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA

This designation pertains to crown land within the drainage of watersheds that are known sources of drinking water within the plan area. This watershed is not officially recognized under the under the Forests and Range Practices Act.

Policies

10.1. Land in this designation should remain undeveloped. 10.2. The Regional District will work with the Ministry of Environment to establish provincial watershed protection designations for the areas designated Community Watershed Protection Area in this plan. 10.3. Activities that could lead to the contamination of streams or ground water and ultimately lead to an unsafe drinking water supply are discouraged. 10.4. Commercial motorized recreation tenures should not be issued in areas under this designation. 10.5. Independent Power Projects are not supported within this designation. 10.6. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range and the Ministry of Energy, and Mines, and Petroleum Resources to limit activities in the area designated as Community Watershed Protection Area so that scenic values, recreational potential, and water quality are protected.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 171 of 323 APRIL 2009

11. PARK

Seton Portage Historic Provincial Park is located on the south side of the Seton River, on the main road through the community. The park was established on March 29, 1972 by the British Columbia Railway. The park commemorates the first stretch of railway constructed in the province. In 1861, three miles of railway track were constructed to transport miners and their provisions between Anderson and Seton Lakes. A continuation of the railway line to Lillooet was completed in 1915.

Policies

8.3. The Regional District will cooperate with BC Rail to ensure that land uses adjacent to the park are consistent with park management objectives.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 172 of 323 APRIL 2009

YALAKOM VALLEY SUB-AREA PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ...... 53

GENERAL PLAN AREA POLICIES ...... 53

1. COMMUNITY GROWTH AND CHARACTER...... 53 2. BIODIVERSITY AND ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY ...... 54 3. COMMUNITY SERVICES,INFRASTRUCTURE, AND TRANSPORTATION...... 55 4. EMERGENCY SERVICES ...... 56 5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ...... 56 6. RECREATION,TOURISM, AND ACCESS ...... 57 LAND USE DESIGNATION POLICIES...... 58

7. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ...... 58 8. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL...... 59 9. AGRICULTURE...... 59 10. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREAS...... 60 11. PARKS AND PROTECTED AREAS ...... 60

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 173 of 323 APRIL 2009

INTRODUCTION

The Yalakom River and Antoine Creek Watersheds, located approximately thirty kilometres northwest of Lillooet on Highway 40, are the geographical area to which the Yalakom Valley Sub-area Plan applies (see Map 9). The plan area consists of approximately 75,000 hectares of land. The elevational range is 400 metres to nearly 3000 metres. The topography consists of highly incised, steep valleys in the southern portion of the area, with benchlands along the lower Yalakom River and Bridge River. The northern Yalakom Watershed has gentler terrain and long ridges in transition to the Fraser Plateau. The geology is highly variable and complex. Nearly 25 per cent of the area is alpine.

Similar to other communities in the northern half of Electoral Area B, the climate in the Yalakom Valley is very dry throughout the year due to the rainshadow effect of the Coast Range. The valley exhibits some of the hottest, driest ecosystem types in British Columbia along the low elevation benches. Over the last thirty-five years, residents have noticed changes in local climate with more variable conditions, including timing of seasons, temperature, and precipitation. Residents report that the danger from wildfire has increased dramatically.

GENERAL PLAN AREA POLICIES

1. COMMUNITY GROWTH AND CHARACTER

The Yalakom community is a diverse group of families making up the latest wave of settlement, which has been ongoing since 1897. The community has maintained a steady population of approximately seventy permanent residents. Settlement has affected only a small part of the Yalakom River and Antoine Creek Watersheds, mostly on the benchlands along the rivers in the southern part of the watersheds. Through the OCP planning process residents expressed their feelings of connectedness to the land and commitment to protecting the wilderness values that make their community uniquely spectacular. Homesteads have developed using principles of sustainability and self-reliance. Families grow large gardens and produce a significant percentage of organic food locally.

Policies

1.1. The present character of the community, a small, rural community living at the edge of wilderness, should be maintained. 1.2. The pattern of slow community growth should be maintained. 1.3. The healthy, caring social relations among all community members and the good relations with surrounding communities should continue to be emphasized. 1.4. The plan area shall be considered a ‘Dark Night Sky Zone’, and those activities that contribute light pollution are discouraged in order to maintain ideal conditions for local and visiting astronomers. 1.5. Honouring and accommodating aboriginal title, rights and traditional uses, while ensuring community values and privacy is respected, is encouraged.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 174 of 323 APRIL 2009

Cultural Heritage 1.6. Studies to assess and locate cultural and historical sites and features in the plan area are supported. 1.7. Preservation initiatives for cultural or historical sites and features in the plan area are supported.

2. BIODIVERSITY AND ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY

The biodiversity of Yalakom Valley is considered high in relation to the wider bioregion. Biodiversity is defined by the Yalakom community as the diversity of ecosystem types, plants, animals, and other organisms that live in an area, and the evolutionary and functional processes that link all of them, allowing them to adapt to biophysical and ecological conditions over time.

The Yalakom community is supportive of Ecosystem-Based Conservation Planning (EBCP). EBCP is a method of ecosystem protection, maintenance, restoration and human use that as the first priority maintains and restores natural ecological integrity, including biological diversity, across the full range of spatial and temporal scales. At the same time, EBCP guides ecologically and culturally sustainable communities and their economies by providing a comprehensive picture of the ecosystem and the ecological limits for human uses. (In this definition, the word natural describes a condition which reflects pre-industrial ecological characteristics and includes indigenous management systems.)

Yalakom Valley residents have begun an EBCP for the Yalakom Valley and adjacent areas along the Bridge River. The analysis was carried out with the assistance of the Lillooet Tribal Council and the technical expertise of the Silva Forest Foundation. The results of the research were incorporated into the St’át’imc Draft Land Use Plan (Nxekmenlhkálha Iti Tmícwa).

Policies

2.1. All permanent and temporary residents, as well as other parties conducting land use activities within the Yalakom River and Antoine Creek Watersheds, are encouraged to apply the following Ecosystem-Based Conservation Planning principles: a. focus on what to protect, before deciding what to use; b. recognize the interdependent relationships between ecosystems, cultures and economies; c. apply the precautionary principle to all plans and activities; d. protect, maintain and, where necessary, restore ecological connectivity, and the full range of composition, structure, and function of enduring features, natural plant communities, and animal habitats and ranges. e. facilitate the protection and restoration of indigenous land use; f. ensure that any planning process is inclusive of the known range of values and interests; g. provide for diverse, ecologically sustainable, community-based economies; and, h. practice adaptive management. 2.2. In all activities, protect the water quality, quantity, and timing of flow for all rivers, streams, lakes, ponds, and springs, including temporary flows. The community’s first priority is protecting

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 175 of 323 APRIL 2009

waterbodies and the riparian areas within domestic use watersheds and along the Yalakom River itself. 2.3. All permanent and temporary residents, as well as other parties conducting land use activities within the Yalakom River and Antoine Creek Watersheds, are encouraged to continue to study and educate themselves about the biodiversity and changing ecological conditions of the area. Collecting a database of ecosystem types and the associated plant and animal communities is encouraged. 2.4. Awareness and protection of rare or endangered plants, animals, and ecotypes is encouraged. 2.5. Continued development of the Yalakom Valley Ecosystem-Based Conservation Plan is encouraged.

Pesticides 2.6. As the Yalakom Community is opposed to pesticide use within the plan area, all land users are encouraged to apply natural pest control measures, such as those approved for organic farming. 2.7. All corporations, contractors, and provincial agencies and are strongly encouraged to notify the Yalakom Community Council of pesticide use within the plan area, including information on the location and timing of the pesticide application.

3. COMMUNITY SERVICES,INFRASTRUCTURE, AND TRANSPORTATION

Water supply and liquid waste management systems within the Yalakom Valley are all private systems. Some water supplies are shared among neighbours through private agreements. The water supplies are typically untreated surface water, used for both domestic and agricultural purposes. The community values the unchlorinated, unfloridated water and wishes to continue to hold responsibility for protecting and conserving the resource. Solid waste is brought to SLRD landfill in Lillooet by individual residents.

Highway 40, the Yalakom Road, and Barton and Osterlund Roads are the primary routes through the Yalakom community. Within the sub-plan area, Highway 40 is largely paved. The other primary routes are Ministry of Transportation maintained gravel roads. All other roads within the sub-plan area that are used to access residences are private roads maintained by the owner or Forest Service Roads.

Other than road maintenance, there are no provincial services provided within the plan area. Local children meet the school bus (provided by the School District #74) at Highway 40 and attend schools in Lillooet. The community lacks reliable telephone service. Some residents have satellite phones and satellite internet.

Policies

3.1. The Regional District supports the development and maintenance of a local or regional recycling program. 3.2. The Regional District supports the development of multi-purpose community hall within the plan area.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 176 of 323 APRIL 2009

Yalakom Road and Highway 40 3.3. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Transportation to: a. improve Yalakom Road through additional grading and use of a water truck in conjunction with the grader; b. coordinate road maintenance with the school bus schedule in order to ensure safe travelling conditions for school children; c. refrain from applying pesticides or road salt in the Yalakom Valley; d. improve road signage with consultation with the community; e. refrain from depositing fill at two locations adjacent to Highway 40 switchbacks where the slopes are unstable.

4. EMERGENCY SERVICES

Within the Yalakom Valley, wildfire, avalanches, and hazards related to La Joie or Terzaghi Dams, such as spills and flooding, have the most potential to create emergency situations.

The Yalakom Community has organized a Wildfire Protection Group to coordinate the residents’ response to wildfire outbreaks. Many residents have taken a fire suppression course through the Ministry of Forests and Range, and several have first-aid training. A system is in place to ensure proper reporting of fires and notification of residents. The community has access to a full set of fire-fighting tools, which was provided through a grant from the Regional District. The tools are housed in a central location in the valley and fire suppression drills conducted seasonally. The community intends to continue to develop its capacity to suppress fire locally, including the future acquisition of a water truck. Residents are interested in working with the Ministry of Forests and Range to explore methods of controlled burning near homes in order to protect the community from wildfire.

Policies

4.1. The Regional District supports the establishment of reliable communication system, particularly for use during emergency events. 4.2. As funds become available, the Regional District supports continued funding of the Wildfire Protection Group for emergency management education, first-aid training, purchasing emergency equipment, and establishing an emergency vehicle in the community. 4.3. The Regional District encourages BC Hydro to establish a protocol and warning system for downstream communities in the event of an emergency affecting Terzaghi or La Joie Dams.

5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Mining and timber extraction continue to be important economic activities in the Yalakom Valley. Hunting and recreational pursuits are also significant economic generators. The community wish to ensure that these economic activities are not detrimental to ecological and community sustainability, and believes that diverse, smaller-scale economic activities are more suitable for the plan area than large-scale operations.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 177 of 323 APRIL 2009

Policies

5.1. The use of the Yalakom EBCP principles to create an ecologically sustainable, community-based economy is supported. 5.2. The continued diversification of the local economy is supported, particularly with organic farming, eco-certified wood products, trades, crafts, and home-based businesses that focus on ecological and community sustainability. 5.3. Ecological restoration projects to address the effects of human land use and climate change are supported. 5.4. Further development of local food production capacity and self-sufficiency is encouraged. 5.5. Yalakom community residents are encouraged to reduce community-level greenhouse gas emissions by: a) using alternative transportation methods (for example, carpooling and developing local public transit), b) reducing the need to commute (for example, by creating home-based businesses), c) using renewable energy sources for homes and vehicles, d) increasing energy efficiency to the greatest extent possible, and, e) sharing resource and implementing Smart Growth principles.

6. RECREATION,TOURISM, AND ACCESS

Policies

Recreation 6.1. Maintaining the current spectrum of outdoor recreation activities is encouraged, with the proviso that closing roads and preventing motorized access to alpine areas is supported where necessary to maintain and improve these activities. 6.2. The low impact, non-motorized11 outdoor recreation opportunity areas proposed by the draft Lillooet LRMP, particularly for the entire Shulaps Range, are supported. 6.3. Directing intensive recreational use to existing sites, such as Lac La Mare, Beaverdam, Ore Creek Recreation Site, is supported. 6.4. Provincial agencies are encouraged to protect highly valued trails from irresponsible, motorized use. 6.5. Provincial agencies are encouraged to provide education to recreational visitors to encourage responsible enjoyment of both mid-country and backcountry areas, and signage for grazing, logging, or other industrial activities.

11 For example, hiking, primitive camping, hunting, fishing, horseback riding, and backcountry skiing.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 178 of 323 APRIL 2009

Tourism 6.6. The development of services for tourists and backcountry recreationists is supported, particularly locally owned establishments that provide food and services, and create an outlet for locally made products, and showcase the community’s local culture. 6.7. Backcountry commercial recreation operators are encouraged to uphold the EBCP principles and consult with experienced local tourism operators and the Yalakom Community Council regarding appropriate land use, locations of critical wildlife habitat, ecologically sensitive areas, and hazardous areas.

Access 6.8. The Regional District encourages the Integrated Land Management Bureau to: a. initiate a comprehensive access management planning process for the plan area, b. implement the recommendations of previous access management agreements developed through the Yalakom Local Resource Use Plan (YLRUP) and the draft Lillooet LRMP; c. maintain existing Wildlife Act motor vehicle closures, including those closures in restricting motorized access above 1920 meters at China Head Mountain, Nine Mile Ridge, Red Mountain to French Mountain, and Hog Mountain; d. improve enforcement efforts and access controls to prevent motorized vehicles from destructive, irresponsible use of backcountry areas; e. implement seasonal access closures in the Upper Yalakom Valley to protect the migration routes of two distinct herds of California Bighorn Sheep (radio collar studies have shown that the size of these herds has declined in recent years); and, f. improve information availability and local signage to advise all users of the locations of private properties and encourage respect for local residents’ peace and quiet enjoyment.

LAND USE DESIGNATION POLICIES

7. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Policies

7.1. Maintaining the current zone of Rural Resource 3 (RR3) is supported. 7.2. Zoning amendment applications to decrease the minimum lots size for newly created lots or increase the permitted number of dwelling will be considered on a case by case basis, in consultation with the Yalakom Community.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 179 of 323 APRIL 2009

Management of Natural Resources 7.3. As the community lives on the edge of a wilderness area with many species of wildlife, residents are encouraged to develop their homes in manner that conserves native species and their habitats, especially species at risk, while applying Bear Smart practices. 7.4. The Regional District encourages individuals and corporations conducting resource management activities within the plan area to: a. consult with the Yalakom Community Council and the Lillooet Tribal Council; b. follow the principles and management directions found within the Official Community Plan, the Yalakom EBCP, and the St’át’imc Draft Land Use Plan (Nxekmenlhkálha Iti Tmícwa); c. emphasize conservation, sharing of our resources, and community-based resource extraction and processing. 7.5. While the development of alternative energy sources is encouraged, independent power project proposals that that do not reflect the principles of the OCP are opposed. 7.6. Other than power lines that directly serve residences (25 kV), the construction of major power line corridors (69 kV or greater) within the plan area is opposed. 7.7. The designations in the St’át’imc Draft Land Use Plan of Antoine, Fred, Ore, Applespring and Terry Creek watersheds as non-industrial use areas where water conservation and protection is the primary consideration is supported.

8. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL

There are no lands designated as Commercial or Industrial within the plan area.

Policies

8.1. Should a commercial development proposal come forward, proponents are encouraged to consult with the community and consider ecosystem-based conservation planning principles as part of the rezoning application process.

9. AGRICULTURE

There are no lands designated as Agriculture within the sub-plan area.

In the Yalakom Community most gardens and farms are certified organic or adhere to sustainable, organic principles. The community is opposed to the use of deleterious substances that would threaten or impair the ability to grow organic food crops. Local farmers emphasize the importance of soil building and reducing reliance on fossil-fuel-based fertilizers.

Policies

9.1. Property owners are encouraged to consult with the community and consider ecosystem-based conservation planning principles in the development of any large-scale farming operations or water diversions for irrigation.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 180 of 323 APRIL 2009

9.2. The plan area is considered by the residents to be a ‘genetically modified organism free zone’, and so those activities that may bring genetically modified organisms into the valley are discouraged. 9.3. Conservation of soil, arable land, and irrigation water sources is encouraged. 9.4. Any water reservoirs constructed for agricultural purposes should also be designed to assist in fire protection. 9.5. Efforts to control the establishment and spread of noxious weeds, particularly those employing alternative methods to pesticide, are encouraged, and funding applications for weed control shall be supported where able.

10. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREAS

Please see Electoral Area B OCP general policies on Community Watershed Protections Areas.

Policies

10.1. Members of the Yalakom community are encouraged to apply for formal protection of Community Watershed Protection Areas that are not recognized under the Forests and Range Practices Act.

11. PARKS AND PROTECTED AREAS

There are currently no parks or protected areas within the sub-plan area. The draft Lillooet LRMP designates two areas, Fred-Antoine Creeks and Yalakom Nine Mile Ridge, as Proposed Protected Areas. Maps 9 and 10 show both official and unofficial recreation sites that have been identified on Crown land.

Policies

11.1. The Fred and Antoine Creeks and Yalakom Creek-Nine Mile Ridge Proposed Protected Areas are supported. 11.2. The following management directions for the Proposed Protected Areas are supported: a. respecting the aboriginal title and rights of the St’át’imc Nation; b. maintaining the areas as wilderness to be left in a natural, undisturbed condition; c. allowing non-motorized cultural and recreational opportunities while protecting the access to and quality of domestic water supplies and the privacy of local residents; d. maintaining a single road through the Fred & Antoine Creeks Proposed Protected Areas to allow access to private land located in Antoine Creek; and, e. enabling community participation in resource management and planning. 11.3. In consultation with the community, further designation of protected areas to protect the ecology of the plan area, especially species at risk and their habitats, is supported.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 181 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 182 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 183 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 184 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 185 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 186 of 323 Squamish Lillooet Regional District Bylaw 1073 Map 6

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 187 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 188 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 189 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 190 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 191 of 323 Request for Decision

Village of Pemberton Zoning Amendment (OR104) Referral

Date: April 15, 2009

Recommendation:

1. THAT the following comments (and staff report) regarding the referral of an application to amend the Village of Pemberton Zoning Bylaw No. 408, 2008 with respect to Lot 1, Plan 29481, DL 203, LLD be forwarded to the Village of Pemberton:

a) SLRD interests are not impacted, and further consultation is not necessary;

b) We note that the proposed change to the Village of Pemberton Zoning Bylaw is consistent with the policy direction of the SLRD Regional Growth Strategy and SLRD Electoral Area C Official Community Plan, in that it will:

i) Concentrate mixed use development into existing settlement areas, maintaining a compact urban form & accommodating growth within the urban boundaries of Pemberton, allowing for increased population density; and

ii) Support the Village of Pemberton as the established business and service centre.

CAO Comments: I concur. P.R.E.

Who Votes: All

Recommendation Report/Document: Attached _X _ Available __ Nil __

Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined: Referral – Village of Pemberton Zoning Amendment request from C2 (Tourist Commercial) to C3 (Portage Road Commercial) for a 0.94 acre triangular piece of property located on Highway 99, immediately adjacent to the Pemberton Valley Lodge.

Relevant Policy: Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) Bylaw No. 1062, 2008 currently at 2nd reading; Electoral Area C Official Community Plan (OCP) Bylaw No. 1008, 2008.

Strategic Relevance: n/a

Desired Outcome(s): Consistency with SLRD policies and bylaws, specifically the Regional Growth Strategy and Area C OCP.

Response Options: 1. Adopt the staff recommendation. 2. Direct staff to research the issue further and develop alternative options.

Preferred Strategy: Option 1 - Adopt the staff recommendation.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 192 of 323 Request for Decision

Village of Pemberton Zoning Amendment (OR104) Referral

Implications Of Recommendation

General: n/a

Organizational: n/a

Financial: n/a

Legal: n/a

Follow-up Action: Inform the Village of Pemberton of the Region Board’s comments ASAP.

Communication: Staff will communicate the Board’s resolution with the Village of Pemberton by letter and/or email.

Other Comments: n/a

Submitted by: Planner, L. Griffith Reviewed by: Director of Planning, S. Olmstead Approved by: CAO, P. Edgington

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 193 of 323 Request for Decision

Village of Pemberton Zoning Amendment (OR104) Referral

Background Report

Issue(s) Defined:

On March 10, 2009 a referral from the Village of Pemberton was received regarding an amendment of their Zoning Bylaw. The applicant, Susanna Bergstrom, on behalf of the registered owner Art Den Dyuf -Whistler Service Park Ltd., has applied to rezone the subject property, legally described as Lot 1, Plan 29481, DL 203, LLD, from Tourist Commercial (C2) to Portage Road Commercial (C3). The purpose of the amendment is to accommodate the proponent’s desire for a “mixed use” commercial building including limited residential uses above. The subject property is 0.94 acres, and located at 1460 Portage Road (Hwy 99), immediately adjacent to the Pemberton Valley Lodge. SLRD staff were advised by Village staff that the zoning amendment is consistent with the Village’s Official Community Plan designation for the property. Notwithstanding the cover letter’s reference to an OCP amendment, no OCP amendment is contemplated with this application.

The Village requested that the SLRD respond by March 31, 2009. Preliminary staff comments were forwarded by this deadline, and any Board comments will be formally communicated to the Village as soon as possible following the April Board meeting.

The primary purpose of the referral from the regional district’s perspective is to assess whether the proposal affects the interests of the SLRD, and if so, to provide comment. The SLRD may either request further ongoing consultation or advise that no further consultation is necessary.

Desired Outcome(s): Consistency with SLRD policies and bylaws, specifically the Regional Growth Strategy and Area C OCP.

Analysis of Options:

The first option is to advise the Village that the SLRD’s interests are not impacted. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the objectives and interests of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regional Growth Strategy and the Area C Official Community Plan (OCP). In terms of managing development, the proposed change would continue to concentrate development into existing settlement areas, thus maintaining a compact urban form and accommodating growth within the urban boundaries of Pemberton and allowing for increased population density. It also supports the Village of Pemberton as the established business and service centre which is an articulated policy of the Area C OCP. The second option is to research the issue further and develop alternative options.

Conclusion: Option one is the preferred option. Staff recommends that the Village of Pemberton be informed that the proposed changes does not affect the SLRD’s interests, given that the change is consistent with relevant SLRD policies, and that no further consultation is necessary.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 194 of 323 March 10th, 2009

PO Box 100 To: Squamish Lillooet Regional District-Mr.ct-Mr. Paul Edgington 7400 Pros ect Street Pemberton Valley Dyking District – Board of Directors Pemberton Ministry of Transportation – Mr. Patrick Hill British Columbia Ministry of Environment- Mrs. Colleen Loguisto CANADA V0N 2L0 Lil’Wat Nation- Mrs. Lucinda Phillips BC Hydro- Mr. Laroy Watt Chamber of Commerce-Mr. Sandy Ryan P. 604 894.6135 Pemberton Valley Trail Association- Mrs. Hillary Downing F. 604 894.6136

Re: Rezoning and OCP Amendment OR104 Email: 1460 Portage Road (Lot 1, Plan 29481, DL 203, LLD) admin@ emberton.ca

ebsite: Dear Sir or Madam, www. emberton.ca Please find enclosed an application received by the Village of Pemberton for a rezoning and amendment to the OCP Bylaw, submitted by Susanna Bergstrom on behalf of Whistler Service Park. The application’s request is to establish the zoning designation of C-3 (Portage Road Commercial) from C-2 (Tourist Commercial).

Please review the attached material and provide your comments on the application to the Village of Pemberton by March 31st, 2009. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the Manager of Development Services, Ms. Caroline Lamont at 604-894-6135, or the applicant’s representative Ms. Susanna Bergstrom at 604-902-9443.

Yours truly, VILLAGE OF PEMBERTON

Suzanne Bélanger Development Services Assistant

cc: Applicant’s Representative-Susanna Bergstrom Chief Administrative Officer-Lori Pilon Manger of Development Services-Caroline Lamont Public Works Manager-Russell Mack Finance Manager-Nikki Gilmore Community Services Manager/Building Inspector-Richard Nicolas Administrative Services Manager-Sheena Fraser Engineering Consultant- Graham Schulz (ISL) Planning Consultant-Michael Rosen

Attachment: Referral Package

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 195 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 196 of 323 Susanna Bergstrom

po box 1619, Mount Currie, BC, V0N2K0

9443 Portage Road, Birken, BC, V0N2L0

[email protected]

604.452.0044 604.452.0045 604.902.9443

Art Den Dyuf - Whistler Service Park Ltd

8021 Mons Road, Whistler, BC, V0N1B8

same as above

[email protected]

604.932.5583

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 197 of 323 N/A

N/A

1 29481 203

1460 Portage Road, Pemberton, BC, V0N2L0

0.94 acres

C-2

C-3 Vacant Land & no use since Art’s purchase 2003, in the ‘80’s the lot was used as a cardlock by Petro Canada. Mixed use building incl. Residential, Business and Professional Offices, Recreation & Leisure Retail, Arts and Crafts shop.

X X X X

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 198 of 323 Refer to Exhibit D for supporting information.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 199 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 200 of 323 EXHIBIT A - SURVEY OF PROPERTY

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 201 of 323 EXHIBIT B - PLAN SHOWING CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL SETBACKS

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 202 of 323 EXHIBIT C - PHOTOS OF PROPERTY

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 203 of 323 EXHIBIT D - WRITTEN SUMMARY

Intentions of the building and development: The intent and goal of the application to rezone this property is to be able to fully develop it long term for our business and residential needs as well as for future prospects of this property. **Our company’s immediate needs as far as building would be offices, sewing floor for prototype making & design, storage & garage. Our immediate personal needs would be an apartment and a suite. The approximate building size for our immediate needs would be around 7-8000 sq ft. As a first step we will build to accommodate our immediate space requirements and we reserve the right to add to the building or build additional separate buildings as our business grows as long as we stay within the building envelope of the site and pending future Development Permits. **Pls note that we haven’t fully developed our space needs and designated floor plans at this time.

Benefits of this location vs. other options: This particular property fit our business and residential needs extremely well in comparison to similar/ closeby locations such as along Portage Road/Arbutus Drive/Crabapple Court and other options such as the Industrial Park & the Down Town. Criterias of which this particular property provide us are the following: PRUHRSHQVSDFHDURXQGWKHEXLOGLQJZKLFKDOVRJLYHVPRUHURRPIRUYHKLFOHVWRDFFHVVRXUORFDWLRQ (compared to denser environments around Arbutus & Down Town) PRUHSULYDWHVHWWLQJZKLFKLVDUHTXLUHPHQWIRUWKHW\SHRIZRUNZHFRQGXFW FRPSDUHGWRGHQVHUHQYLURQ- ments around Arbutus & Down Town etc) DPRUHDWWUDFWLYHORFDWLRQIRUDUHSUHVHQWDEOHEXVLQHVVDVRXUVHOYHV FRPSDUHGWR,QGXVWULDO3DUNDQGHYHQ over Portage Rd and Down Town) EHWWHUDFFHVVWREXVLQHVVHVDURXQGWKHSURSHUW\ZKLFKLQSDUWLFXODUZRXOGEHWKHDGMDFHQW3HPEHUWRQ Lodge for our visitors (compared to Industrial Park and to an extent the Portage Rd area as far as the hotel goes) IURPDUHVLGHQWLDODVSHFWZHILQGLWWREHDEHQHILWWRLQDOHVVGHQVHDUHDDQGUHDOO\FORVHWRWKH3HPEHUWRQ Trail network behind the Lodge.

Access point and vision of the development: The access point to this property will be via Harrow Rd from the Hwy passing the Pemberton Lodge. Pls see attached map on next page. The vision of this development is to create something amazing for ourselves and Pemberton. We’re extremely enthusiastic about being a part of shaping the town we live in and love. We want to create a modern building with materials native to this area. We love clean lines and purposeful architecture as a philosophy. We also believe in architecture that is not instrusive to its surrounding environment.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 204 of 323 REQUEST FOR DECISION BOARD MEETING – APRIL 27, 2009 Development Variance Permit # 77 Britannia Beach – Britannia Oceanfront Developments Recommendation: THAT the Board approve and authorize the issuance of Development Variance Permit #77, to vary the provisions of SLRD Sign Bylaw No, 681 to permit a project development sign 3.5m high by 5.79m wide on the subject property at Britannia Beach.

CAO Comments: I concur. P.R.E.

Report/Document: Attached _X_ Available __ Nil __

Key Issue(S)/Concepts Defined: Britannia Beach Developments wishes to erect a project development sign at Britannia Beach that is larger than is currently permitted under our sign bylaw.

Relevant Policy: SLRD Sign Bylaw No. 681, 1998

Strategic Relevance: n/a

Desired Outcome(s): Consideration of variance request and decision from Board

Response Options: 1. Approve variance as proposed, and require applicant to register covenant to limit permission to two years; 2. Approve proposal with revisions from Board; 3. Deny application.

Preferred Strategy: Option 1 IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:

General: Approval of minor variance to sign bylaw. Appearance of sign that will be visible from Highway 99

Organizational: Approval of this DVP is consistent with approval of DVP for Porteau Cove

Financial: n/a

Legal: n/a

Follow Up Action: Confirm registration of required covenant, then issuance of permit and filing of Notice on Title with Land Titles Office

Communication: Letter and permit sent to owner, copied to Building Inspector, copied to file

Other Comments: None

Submitted by: T Napier______Endorsed by: _P. Edgington_____ Reviewed by: S. Olmstead___

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 205 of 323 Request for Decision Background Report

Prepared by: Tracy Napier, Planning Technician Prepared For: Board of Directors Meeting, April 27, 2009

Subject: Application for Development Variance Permit

Applicant: Britannia Oceanfront Developments Legal Description: Lot 1, DLs 891 and 892, Plan 19960, NWD General Location: Britannia Beach, Electoral Area D

Problem Defined:

BACKGROUND The Board will recall that this application was first considered in November 2008, at which time the Board noted concerns regarding the size and appearance of the proposed signs, and referred the matter back to staff for clarification.

PROPOSAL The applicant has revised the proposal and is seeking a variance to allow the newly designed sign (see attached Proposed Sign). The revised sign is two-sided, 5m in height, and the overall area of each side of the sign, above the posts, is 20.2m2. Thus the total signage area is proposed to be 40.4m2.

POLICY The subject property is subject to the regulations of SLRD Sign Bylaw No. 681, which limits the size of signs that are within 400m of a controlled access highway (e.g. Sea to Sky Highway) to a maximum area of no greater than 8m2 and a maximum height of 5m.

IMPLICATIONS This variance is similar to the Porteau Cove Development sign variance to allow for larger signage that is visible from Highway 99. In the case of Porteau Cove, the variance was issued for two separate one-sided signs, each with an overall area that is larger than what is proposed in this application. The table below provides a comparison of the current variance request to the variance issued in 2006 for two similar signs at Porteau Cove:

Permitted under DVP# 58 Proposed DVP# 77 Bylaw No. 681 (Porteau Cove) (Britannia Beach) Maximum area of all signs 53.6m2 (26.8m2 each x 2 S. 3.1(b) – 8m2 40.4m2 (20.2m2 per side) signs)

Maximum dimensions of a 5.0m wide X sign permitted by the n/a 5.79m wide X 3.5m high variance 5.63m high Maximum height of a sign 5.0m 6.6m 5.0m

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 206 of 323 Staff note that the revised Britannia Beach proposal is in conformance with the height restriction, and requires a variance only for the overall square footage.

A covenant was required as a condition of the variance that was granted for the Porteau Cove sign. Staff recommend that a similar covenant be registered for the subject property, to allow the signage to remain for only 2 years from the date of issuance of the DVP.

Conclusion: The heavy timber frame structure of the proposed sign is in keeping with the heritage character of the area.

During the review of the original application notification letters were sent to property owners within 50m of the subject property, and no comments were received. Also, the Britannia Beach Community Association supported the original application. The revised proposal was not referred to adjacent owners because the revision reduces the overall size and does not appear to represent any greater possible impacts than the original proposal.

Action Plan A covenant will be registered prior to issuance of the permit to ensure that the sign remains in place for only two years.

Attachments: Site Location Map Proposed Sign DVP 078 (including Site Survey Plan)

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 207 of 323 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT Development Variance Permit # 77

File No. 3090 20 077

Issued to: Britannia Oceanfront Developments Corporation, INC. NO. 766644

(Registered owners according to Land Title Office, hereinafter referred to as the Permittee)

Address: 11th Floor, 938 Howe Street Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1N9

1) This Development Variance Permit is issued subject to compliance with all of the By-laws of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District applicable thereto, except as specifically varied or supplemented by this permit.

2) This Development Variance Permit applies to and only to those lands within the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District shown on the attached Appendix A, attached to and forming part of this permit, and described as:

Parcel Identifier: 005-484-073 Legal Description: Lot 1, District Lots 891 and 892, Plan 19960, New Westminster District.

3) The provisions of Sign By-law No. 681, 1998 are varied to permit one two-sided sign per parcel on the Lands, substantially in the form as shown on Appendix B to DVP 077, which is attached to and forms part of this permit, as follows:

(a) The maximum area of a sign under section 3.1(b) is varied from 8 square metres per sign to 20.2 square metres per side of a two sided sign.

4) The following conditions and requirements are imposed:

1. The maximum dimensions of a sign under clause 3)(a) shall be 5.79 metres width and 3.5 metres height.

2. Section 219 Covenant to be registered on title that will specify that the signage is permitted to remain for only 2 years from date of issuance of Development Variance Permit 77.

5) This Permit prevails over the provisions of By-law 681 in the event of conflict.

6) Security Requirements: None

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 208 of 323 7) The land described herein shall be developed strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions and provisions of this permit and any plans and specifications attached to this permit shall form a part hereof.

8) This permit is not a building permit.

9) Notice of this Permit shall be filed in the Land Title Office at New Westminster under Section 927 of the Local Government Act, and upon such filing, the terms of this Permit or any amendment hereto shall be binding upon all persons who acquire an interest in the land affected by the Permit.

AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE REGIONAL BOARD THE

______DAY OF ______, 2008.

______Paul R. Edgington Administrator

END OF DOCUMENT

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 209 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 210 of 323 DVP 77 - Appendix B: Britannia Beach Development Sign

Sign Height = 3.5m (approx.) Sign Width = 5.79m Total area of each side = 20.2m2 (Thus total sign area = 40.4m2) Total Height of sign (including posts) = 5.0m

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 211 of 323 REQUEST FOR DECISION

SUBJECT: SLRD Trails and Open Spaces Risk Management Policy

RECOMMENDATION: 1. THAT the Trails and Open Spaces Risk Management Policy be adopted for the following services:

2. THAT with credit to the Resort Municipality of Whistler as the source, the following components of the Whistler Trail Standards for Environmental and TTFs be adopted as Appendix A to the SLRD Trails and Open Spaces Risk Management Policy: - Trail Types - Mountain Bike Trail difficulty Levels - Supporting Guidelines and Standards - TTF Construction Standards - Fall Zone Guidelines - Sign Guidelines - Management Guidelines - Terminology

CAO COMMENTS: Concur with recommendations. PRE

RECOMMENDATION Report/Document: Attached

KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: A clear, achievable risk management policy is a necessity for all SLRD trails and open spaces services

RELEVANT POLICY: MIA bulletin on Trail Risk Maintenance (attached), Whistler Trail Standards Manual (attached) and:

- Britannia Beach Parks and Trails Service Establishment Bylaw No. 952-2005 - Furry Creek Open Space Maintenance Service Establishment Bylaw No. 977-2006 - Sea to Sky Corridor Regional Trails Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1006-2006 - Pemberton Valley Recreational Trails Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1035-2006 - Porteau Cove Parks and Open Space Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1056-2007

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 212 of 323 STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: an inspection and maintenance policy, clear guidelines for maintenance, and documentation will minimize the SLRD’s exposure to risk.

DESIRED OUTCOME(S): Adoption of the Risk Management policy in advance of management of trails.

RESPONSE OPTIONS: 1. Adopt as presented 2. Adopt with changes, refer changes to MIA for comment 3. Refer back to staff for revisions

PREFERRED STRATEGY: Adopt as presented

IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:

GENERAL: A policy is the first step in reducing the SLRD’s exposure to risk with regard to trails. A regular inspection and maintenance schedule, with full documentation will be the result.

The draft policy has been reviewed by, and positive comments received from, Municipal Insurance Association.

ORGANIZATIONAL: This policy would apply to all trails and open space services currently operated by the Regional District. Presently there are two trails; Britannia’s walking trail system and Furry Creek dyke trail. Once the SLRD begins to manage more trails, workload will increase in order to provide the service. Likely to be a combination of staff oversight, volunteers, and contracted service where no other option is available. Inspection, documentation and follow-up will be a key task for the Open Spaces Coordinator and the work is expected to be 10 - 15% of the Coordinator’s workload between March and October of each year.

FINANCIAL: Financial implications have been incorporated into the Financial Plan. There is minimal work expected in 2009, as no new trails are planned this year.

FOLLOW UP ACTION: The SLRD holds a Management Agreement with Ministry of Tourism, Sport and the Arts to maintain higher value “established” trails in the region. No trails have yet been established. There are thirty trails on agency referral, most of which are on municipal land Should these trails be established through s. 56 of the Forest and Range Practices Act, and the SLRD agree to take over maintenance of some or all of these trails, a risk management program including inspections, public education, signage and maintenance will be instituted based on this policy.

COMMUNICATION: If adopted, this policy should be referred member municipalities and local trails groups for information.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 213 of 323 OTHER COMMENTS:

Submitted by: Allison Macdonald Reviewed by: Paul Edgington

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 214 of 323 DRAFT SLRD Risk Management Policy for Trails and Open Spaces

Introduction

In Canada, the Occupiers Liability Act established a clear duty to ensure that a trail is reasonably safe. The Occupiers Liability Act also establishes that a person who enters “recreational trails reasonably marked as such” shall be deemed to have willingly assumed all risks. It is important to understand and ensure that the risks associated with trail use are properly managed and exposure to accidents is mitigated.

To prevent accidental injuries and potential claims, local governments who manage trails need policies, standards, inspection and maintenance programs and signage that provide a safe environment for trail users based on the financial abilities, resources and the service level provided by that local government. In all local governments, resources are limited and are allocated on a priority and needs basis. It is therefore critical to maintain documentation, maintain standards of service and enforce policies that provide evidence that the local government has taken reasonable actions to prevent accident or loss. Recent court decisions have reaffirmed policy as a reasonable defence for local governments.

Risk Management Process

Risk management is the process used to minimize the adverse effects of accidents. Loss prevention measures are steps taken to reduce the likelihood of injuries. The following five steps are required in an effective Risk Management Program:

1. Identify exposures – inspections, maintenance practices, training of workers and volunteers, signage, equipment, structures and facilities, incident reports, claims, public input, etc. 2. Review current policies, procedures, priorities, standards, forms 3. Refine or develop new policies or procedures to deal with identified or potential risks 4. Implement changes 5. Monitor results and review annually.

Risk management cannot prevent all accidents from occurring, however, good risk management can control exposures to loss. Technology, Mother Nature, users, uses, and standards will change over time, so it is important to monitor risk management plans and activities to ensure that guidelines and operating policies remain relevant.

Risk Management Responsibility

The Open Spaces Coordinator will be responsible for managing, monitoring and evaluating the risk management process. The Coordinator will also be responsible to recommend policy updates and new policies affecting planning and operations.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 215 of 323 This policy is applicable to trails under SLRD management and tenure within SLRD established Trails and Open Spaces services.

Signage

Proper informational signage on trails is critical to an effective risk management program (RMP). Users need to know where they are, where they are going, distances, and direction. They may also need to know degree of difficulty, type of trail (primary use), warnings and potential hazards, and reminders that use of trails is at their own risk.

Trail mapping and information signs on kiosks will help visitors find their way through unfamiliar territory.

The SLRD will provide and maintain information signage at trail heads and key connections, to include degree of difficulty, hazard warnings and type of trail (if needed).

Inspections, Safety and Security Issues

Inspections are a critical element in the RMP. Inspection reports and subsequent maintenance to rectify trail issues is a preventative measure designed to identify potential or real hazards before there is an incident. Issues will arise from time to time on specific trails and they must be addressed through the trail maintenance process, the priority system in place, and the resources available. The SLRD will provide inspections and maintenance based on the attached matrix and funds available.

Trail Standards for Construction and Repair

For new trail construction, and repair of existing infrastructure, the Whistler Trail Standards for: Trail Types Mountain Bike Trail difficulty Levels Supporting Guidelines and Standards TTF Construction Standards Fall Zone Guidelines Sign Guidelines Management Guidelines Terminology are adopted as the SLRD standards and are set out in Appendix A of this policy.

Employees, Volunteers, Volunteer Organizations and Insurance

All persons working on trails must be properly oriented and trained, including volunteers. The training may vary depending on the complexity of the task. WCB working standards must be maintained for all workers. Volunteers working under Regional District staff will be covered for insurance and will be required to sign in on a daily basis. Volunteer organizations working with the Regional District must carry their own liability insurance, indemnify the Regional District and additional name the Regional District on the insurance.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 216 of 323 Partnering and Service Agreements

There will be more opportunities to work with existing or new community groups and service clubs on both maintenance and trail development issues. Where there are financial considerations, partnering and service agreements based on the trail standards and guidelines may be negotiated between the Regional District and these groups.

Trail Inspection Schedule

High Rated Trail Medium Rated Trail Low Rated Trail Frequency of Detailed Twice per year Once per year unless Once per year inspection there are TTF’s*, then twice per year Scheduled Twice per year Once per year Trail sweep days should Maintenance suffice Mitigate problem trail Immediately As able, subject to As able, subject to issues funds available funds available

Funding High priority Medium priority – Low priority – suggest suggest adoption by adoption by trail clubs trail clubs or other or other interests interests *TTF – technical trail feature, generally (but not always) a manmade structure.

Inspections

Inspections will be carried out by volunteers, contractors, or staff, all under SLRD supervision.

Inspection Documentation

A Trail Inspection form will be completed for each scheduled inspection, and kept in the SLRD records. A sample trail inspection form is attached.

Trail Classifications

Trails will be rated “high”, “medium” and “low” value based on the following classification system, which has been filtered through the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and the Arts Determination of Significance for Recreation Trails”. The points assigned consider the value of the trail to both recreational trail users and land managers.

The following matrix is used to rate trails based on the following criteria:

- Linkage and connectivity - Cultural/historic significance - Setting - Use level - Investment

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 217 of 323 - Trail infrastructure, and - Trail surfacing

Category Descriptor Attribute Points Linkage and Community or network link Critical linkage Automatically connectivity rated ‘high’ Important linkage or 3 connection Recognized trail connection 2 Non-connecting trail 1 Heritage, historic Heritage designation Heritage designation by order Automatically value in council rated ‘high’ Historic Value Recognized historic value 3 Setting Disturbance Natural 3 Semi-natural 2 Disturbed 1 Scenic features Along route or at High value 3 destination Moderate value 2 Low or no value 1 Use level Estimated use Very high (>1001 user 3 days/year) High (501 – 1000 user 2 days/year) Moderate (101 – 500) 1 Low (<100) 0 Investment Trail Infrastructure Major bridges, trestles, built 3 facilities, fences Minor bridges/culverts 1 Trail Surface Major surfacing/ballast 3 construction Minor surfacing 1 Trails achieve a “high” rating with a score of >15 points Trails achieve a “medium” rating with a score of 9 -15 points Trails achieve a “low” rating with a score of <9 points

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 218 of 323 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan Appendix “E”

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 219 of 323 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan Appendix “E”

8/20/2008 16 of 18

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 220 of 323 WHISTLER TRAIL STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL AND TECHNICAL TRAIL FEATURES

4325 BLACKCOMB WAY, WHISTLER BC CANADA VON 1B4 TELEPHONE(604) 932. 5535 FACSIMILE(604) 935. 8109

www.whistler.com/rmow

RESORT MUNICIPALITY OF WHISTLERFIRST EDITION

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 221 of 323 AUTHOR’S NOTES

s planners, we must not lose sight of the fact that guests are here A to have a good time, avoid injury and not get lost. The evolution of mountain bike trails, recreational equipment, and environmental issues require that this document be amendable.

Thanks to North Shore Mountain Bike Association (NSMBA) and the Whistler Off-Road Cycling Association (WORCA) for reviewing the document and providing feedback. Also thanks to Channa Pelpola, Ken Neave and Jim Richardson for their feedback and insight. Special thanks to Keith Bennett for his feedback, insight and proactive approach to mountain biking.

Cover photos were provided by Bonnie Makarewicz Photography and David Diplock, Director of the North Shore Mountain Bike Association. Trail Type drawings by Jensen Resort Planning.

Andrew DeBoer Whistler Cycling Committee Summer 2003 DAVID DIPLOCK PHOTO DAVID

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 1 Page 222 of 323 WHISTLERTRAIL STANDARDS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION

Author’s Notes 1 histler, British Columbia has been recognized as a premier Table of Contents 2 W destination resort for mountain biking. For the most part, this can be credited to the Whistler Mountain Bike Park and a network of Introduction 3 valley and off-road trails that provide a recreational and commuter experience for a wide range of residents and visitors. To sustain this Trails and Land Use 4 experience, the Resort Municipality of Whistler (RMOW) proposes to Land Use Directions 4 review, sign, maintain and manage this network of trails throughout the Whistler Valley. This document is not a “how-to” on building or Compatibility Matrix 5 maintaining trails; rather it is the standard by which the trails will be managed within the Whistler Valley. Trail Types 6

Mountain Bike Trail Difficulty Levels 8 The Resort Municipality of Whistler’s Trail Standards, Environmental and Technical Trail Features was drafted in support of two initiatives Supporting Guidelines and Standards 10 identified by Volume One of Whistler 2002: Charting a Course for the Future. The first and foremost initiative described under the Environmental Guidelines 10 priority of Moving Toward Environmental Sustainability, states “We’ve TTF Construction Standards 12 established a trail hierarchy and environmental standards to ensure the type of trail and its maintenance is appropriate to the setting.” A Fall Zone Guidlines 14 land use compatibility matrix was developed to address this objective. The matrix outlines the Trail Type and Trail Difficulty Level acceptable Sign Guidelines 15 in distinct land-use classes. As well, environmental guidelines were Management Guidelines 17 established to minimize the placement of trails in sensitive environments. The second initiative described under the priority of Trail Maintenance 17 Enhancing the Whistler Experience states “Whistler is one of the top bike towns in North America, with world-class trails…” Whistler’s Terminology 19 trails must continue to provide exciting experiences for all levels of riders from families to advanced riders. Attention to providing a challenging experience, maintenance, a seamless network and an easy-to-use trail system will help position Whistler as one of the top bike towns in North America.

Appropriate management of our on- and off-road trail network is intended to elevate Whistler’s status as a cycling destination with minimal environmental impact. DAVID DIPLOCK PHOTO DAVID BONNIE MAKAREWICZ PHOTO

2 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 223 of 323 3 WHISTLERTRAIL STANDARDS TRAILS AND LAND USE PAN PROTECTED AREA NETWORK – Divided into the following three subcategories of protection.5

his section is a macroscopic view of the trails, the environment PAN 3 – RESERVE LANDS T and where trails may be placed. This section outlines the levels of Large tracts of relatively natural land, which could be subject to recreational or other land protection, trail type descriptions and trail difficulty levels. These development provided an Environmental Impact Assessment is done. PAN 3 protection is generally used for second three classifications interact together as defined by a compatibility growth forests and other natural areas not include in PAN 1 and 2. In cases of development, key ecological matrix. components of reserve lands may be subject to PAN 1 or 2 protection after development. Most trail types are acceptable with the exception of paved Type I trails.

LAND USE DIRECTIONS PAN 2 – SPECIAL MANAGEMENT ZONES Well protected and allow some low-impact human activities or development (creation of trails). Priorities for PAN 2 protection include significant streams and riparian areas, significant old growth forests and wildlife corridors. Only low impact trails such as Trail Type III, IV or V are Whistler’s environmental values and principles direct us to address acceptable to be built in PAN 2 areas. land use as an important environmental consideration. Whistler’s principle of an ecosystem-based approach advises us to mesh our PAN 1 – KEY PROTECTED AREAS Preserved to protect unique and sensitive ecosystems from any human human purposes with the larger patterns and flows of the natural development or use, with the possible exception in individual cases of very low-impact nature trails, boardwalks or world, and to study these to inform and guide our activities on the wildlife viewing platforms for the specific purpose of habitat protection. Priorities for PAN 1 protection include land.1 streams, wetlands, riparian areas, old growth forests, key wildlife corridors and unique or threatened habitat types. No cycling trails are to be built in these areas. From the draft Whistler Environmental Strategy, six land use directions are defined for the Whistler Valley. Each land use direction has a different level of environmental protection. For the purpose of this document, the LRUP and PAN 3 are given the same level of conservation. COMPATIBILITY MATRIX

DEVELOPED AREAS – This land use designation includes industrial, The Whistler Valley effectively has five land use directions. These commercial and residential areas. land use directions relate to the five trail types (reference to page 6-7) and the first four trail difficulty levels (reference to page 8-9) in the RECREATIONAL GREENWAYS – An important means for creating following compatibility matrix. The RMOW will construct new trails linkages between the built and natural environments, and between the only in environments compatible with trails. needs of human communities and natural ecological systems. Incorporating opportunities for both recreational activities and the maintenance of natural features and wildlife habitat, Recreational Greenways are a vital part of environmentally responsible land use LAND USE DIRECTION planning.2 Developed Greenways PAN 3 PAN 2 PAN 1 Areas include LRUP LRUP – The Local Resource Use Plan was developed in response to public concerns over logging effects on the visual quality of landscapes Mountain Bike and the recreation uses of the land in and near the RMOW. It was a TRAIL DIFFICULTY joint effort from the Ministry of Forests, Squamish Forest District, and _I______✔_____✘✘✘______✔_____✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘______3 the RMOW. The LRUP boundaries extend from Brandywine Falls in TRAIL _II______✔✔✔______✘____✔✔✔______✘✘______✔✔______✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘______the south to Cougar Mountain in the north. LRUP land contains rare TYPE ______✘____✔✔✔______✘____✔✔✔______✘____✔✔✔______✘____✔✔✔______✘✘✘✘______and unique species or unique habitat features not found in other III ecosystems and are therefore important to protect.4 IV______✘✘______✔✔______✘✘______✔✔______✘✘______✔✔______✘✘______✔✔______✘✘______GG______✘✘✘✔ ✘✘✘✔ ✘✘✘✔ ✘✘ ✘✔ ✘✘ ✔✔6 6 V ______

✔ = Compatible ✘= Incompatible G = Grandfather Clause7 1 The Whistler Environmental Strategy, Discussion Paper, September 21, 1999, Executive TABLE 1 COMPATIBILITY MATRIX Summary, Page x. 2 Ibid., Section 6.0, Page 35. 3 Forest Recreation Plan, Whistler Local Resource Use 5 The Whistler Environmental Strategy, Section 5.1, Page 29. Plan, June, 1995, Page 1 6 Only hiking trails, in individual cases, on very low-impact nature trails, boardwalks or wildlife platforms for the specific purpose of habitat protection are 4 The Whistler Environmental permitted to be constructed in PAN 1. 7 Strategy, Section 4.0, Page 23. BONNIE MAKAREWICZ PHOTO Refer to page 18, this document

4 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 224 of 323 5 WHISTLERTRAIL STANDARDS

TRAIL TYPES

Trail Types8 are a description of non-motorized trail tread characteristics. Trail Type I has the highest amount of TYPE III traffic and the most impact on the environment of the trail types. Conversely, Trail Type V has little traffic and the • plan as unsurfaced single-track trail trail tread is minimal. • may be machine built • clear width to 1.1-1.3 m • clear height to 2.4 m TYPE I • provide 50-70 cm tread width on native soil • plan as paved double-track trail for smooth, all weather use to provide access to village, parks and subdivisions • use asphalt or chip-seal coat surfacing • clear width to tread width plus 0.6 m gravel shoulder and adequate drainage on each side • clear height to 3.0 m • provide 2-3 m tread width • provide illumination for night use if appropriate • provide interpretive and directional signs, benches, viewing areas where appropriate TRAIL TYPE III

TYPE IV • plan as unsurfaced single-track trail • clear width to 1 m • clear height to 2.4 m TRAIL TYPE I • provide 30-50 cm width tread on native soil, sometimes rough terrain

TYPE II • plan as surfaced double-track or single-track trail • machine built • remove all embedded trail obstacles TRAIL TYPE IV • use crushed limestone with fines, well-compacted gravel, or existing old roadbeds • clear width to 5.0 m for double-track and 1.6 m for single-track trails TYPE V • clear height to 2.4 m • plan as low-impact nature trail or lightly used • provide 2-3 m tread width for double-track trails, 1 m for single-track trails wilderness trail • provide illumination for night use if appropriate • no high impact users, such as motorized vehicles or horses • clear height to 2.4 m • provide 30-50 cm tread maximum, avoid tread grubbing, sections of very rough terrain • in the case of low-impact nature trails use boardwalks to traverse sensitive areas

TRAIL TYPE II

8 Sources for these classifications are: BC Parks; BC Forest Service and TRAIL TYPE V RMOW P-4 Risk Management, Trail Classifications, Schedule C

6 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 225 of 323 7 WHISTLERTRAIL STANDARDS

MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL DIFFICULTY LEVELS The following identify all the levels of trail technical difficulty as they apply to mountain bikes, starting with easiest and moving up to expert unlimited. Included are general and detailed description of trails and Technical Trail Features (TTFs). This section quantifies what characteristics compose the trail difficulty for mountain bikes.

NAME: Easiest SYMBOL: White circle NAME: More Difficult SYMBOL: Blue Square NAME: SYMBOL: GENERAL NAME: Most Difficult SYMBOL: Black Diamond Expert Unlimited Double GENERAL Black Diamond • Fairly flat, wide and paved. Suitable for all users.9 •Challenging riding with steep slopes and/or GENERAL obstacles, possibly on a narrow trail with poor GENERAL DETAILED traction. Requires riding experience. 11 • A mixture of long steep climbs, loose trail surfaces, numerous difficult obstacles to avoid or jump over, • Exceptional bike control skills and balance • Maximum grade: 10% drop-offs and sharp corners. Some sections are essential to clear many challenging obstacles. • Preferred average grade: no more than 5% DETAILED definitely easier to walk. 12 High-risk level. Only a handful of riders will • Maintain a minimum 2.5 m curve radius • Maximum climbing grade: 25% enjoy these rides. • Usually associated with Trail Type I • Maximum sustained climbing grade: 10% DETAILED • The RMOW recognizes Expert Unlimited as a • Maximum descent grade on non-rock surface: 35% difficulty level but due to the small size of the EXPECTED TECHNICAL TRAIL FEATURES • Curve radius: 1.8 m minimum • Maximum climbing grade: 30% • Maximum sustained climbing grade: 15% user group, the RMOW will not pursue TTFs are not appropriate for this trail level. • Usually associated with Trail Type III or IV • Usually associated with Trail Type III, IV or V ownership of these trails, however there may be some of these elements on a trail provided there EXPECTED TECHNICAL TRAIL FEATURES is a clearly defined alternate route around. GENERAL EXPECTED TECHNICAL TRAIL FEATURES • TTF width to height ratio of 1:2 GENERAL DETAILED • TTF width to height ratio of 1:4 • Small bridges (flat, wide, low and rollable from • Similar to Most Difficult • Elevated bridges and teeter-totters with maximum section to section) • Usually associated with Trail Type III or IV NAME: Easy SYMBOL: Green circle • Small rollable drops deck height • Connected bridges • Small teeter-totters EXPECTED TECHNICAL TRAIL FEATURES • Mandatory air GENERAL • Small jumps GENERAL • Gentle climbs and easily avoidable obstacles such as • Larger jumps • Medium sized logs • Risk exceeds Most Difficult due to height, widths rocks, roots and pot-holes.10 • Steep descents with sharp transitions and exposure DETAILED • Fall zones may not meet fall zone standards DETAILED DETAILED • Embedded trail obstacles: up to 20 cm high • The consequences of errors may be severe and • Elevated bridges: less than 3 m (10’)13 high • Maximum grade: 15% • Elevated bridges: less than 1.8 m (6’) high above rescue may be difficult • Maximum sustained climbing grade: 8% surface above surface ➞ • Curve radius: 2.4 m minimum ➞ Minimum width of flat decking is one-quarter Minimum width of flat decking is one-half the DETAILED • Usually associated with Trail Type II or III the height above surface height above surface • Exceeding Most Difficult ➞For connected sections, the bisecting angle • Teeter-totter: maximum pivot height less EXPECTED TECHNICAL TRAIL FEATURES between each connected section must be large than 1.8 m (6’) above surface ➞ GENERAL enough to allow the bicycle to complete Minimum width of flat decking is one-quarter • Small roots & logs to cross transition without requiring any wheel lifting the height above surface at pivot point • Embedded rocks to avoid techniques • Mandatory air less than 1.0 m (3.3’) vertical • Wide bridges • Teeter-totter: maximum pivot height, less than • Rock or ramp descents not to exceed 120% 60 cm (2’) high above the surface • Jumps ➞ DETAILED ➞Minimum width of flat decking is one-half the Table tops, no maximum height ➞No gap jumps or rhythm sections • Embedded trail obstacles: up to 10 cm. height above surface at pivot point • Logs and roots perpendicular to direction of travel • Rock or ramp descents not to exceed 45% (±15°) • Drop-offs not exceeding 30 cm high with exit • Bridge minimum 90 cm wide, handrail required if cleared of all obstacles height of bridge above surface exceeds 60 cm • Jumps • Rock face descents not to exceed 25% ➞No jumps with consequences for lack of speed • No drops (for example, coffin jumps or gap jumps) • No jumps ➞Table top jumps maximum height 60 cm (2’) ➞Jumps maximum height 45 cm (18”) 12 Paul Kennett 9 Paul Kennett; Classic New Zealand Mountain Bike Rides; 1996 13 WCB requires “…that a fall protection system is used when work is being done at a place (a) from which a fall of 3m (10ft) or more may occur, or (b) where 10 Paul Kennett a fall from a lesser height involves an unusual risk of injury.” Occupational Health & Safety Regulation Book 2, section 11.2, page 11-2 11 Paul Kennett

8 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 226 of 323 9 WHISTLERTRAIL STANDARDS SUPPORTING GUIDELINES AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS AND STANDARDS • Trail construction of Trail Types III-V near an aquatic area within 30 m of streams and within management zones as per Forest Practice Codes must minimize vegetation removal and soil disturbance. his section is a microscopic view of trails. It contains guidelines Construction standards should be consistent with trail use, thereby and standards about the placement of trails, construction and T minimizing trail width requirements. strength of technical trail features and the signing of trails. • Structures in direct contact with water should be inert (for example, natural untreated cedar, precast concrete or steel) to avoid water ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES quality impacts associated with chemical leaching from treated wood. Pile supported structures are preferred over slabs or floats for bridges requiring supports in contact with streams. The benefits of a trail for recreational purposes must be balanced • Locate bridge crossings to minimize disturbance to streambeds and with the desire to protect the environment. All intrusions into the banks. Sections of the waterway that are straight and where banks are environment have some degree of impact. However, these impacts can stable are preferred for crossing. be minimized to balance the objective of a recreational experience with • Construct bridges across streams to top-of-the-bank. This minimizes minimal impact on the surrounding environment. Trails that adversely erosion of stream banks and sedimentation of streams. impact the environment will deteriorate in time, have a low aesthetic value and incur a high maintenance cost. Trail construction must strive GENERAL for minimal impact on their surroundings and be designed with • Avoid cutting down live trees. consideration for the specific environment and the intended use of • Tree branches must be cut at the collar, both longer or shorter are the trails. 14 likely to cause infection to the tree (figure 1). 15 • Cover exposed roots. TRAIL PLACEMENT GUIDELINES • If pretreated wood has been selected for structures being placed in • Trail placement should avoid hazard areas such as unstable slopes, the ground, the structure should be isolated in poly wrap below soil prone to erosion, cliffs, embankments and undercut stream grade. banks, etc. • Avoid shallow rooted trees with high windthrow potential and snags. • Avoid routes that impact on wildlife species. USE OF MACHINERY • Avoid critical habitat of rare or fragile plant species. If there are • Limited access trails that penetrate sensitive areas should be fragile plant communities next to the trail, delineate the trail edges by constructed manually with materials and equipment that can be using logs or rocks. easily transported by small work crews. • Avoid sensitive or fragile archaeological or historic sites. FIGURE 1 BRANCH BARK RIDGE AND • If machinery is required, minimum standards as per Forest Practices • Avoid building trails in community BRANCH COLLAR Code should be adopted (i.e. no watersheds. machinery within 5 m of any water- • Avoid trail routing that encourages users to body.) Low impact construction take shortcuts where an easier route or techniques should be employed interesting feature is visible. If an Living such as small underinflated, rubber branch interesting feature exists, locate the trail to Branch tired vehicles, and construction provide the desired access to the trail user. bark ridge pads, platforms or cranes. Use landforms or vegetation to block 2nd cut Prefabricated structures that can be potential shortcut routes. 1st cut manually assembled on site should • Avoid routing a trail too close to another be used, if possible. trail section to prevent trail proliferation or 3rd cut shortcuts between the two trails. • Route trailbeds on bedrock or hard packed surfaces and avoid organic materials. Branch Branch • Use placed stones in sensitive areas and collar collar steep descents to minimize trail erosion. 14 Sources for these classifications are: Ministry of Forest, Recreation Trail Management; Access Near Aquatic Areas, A Guide to Sensitive Planning, Design and Management, Province of BC. 15 “Pruning Basics and Tools” [ http://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/nursery/430-455/430-455.pdf ] (April 7, 2003) DAVID DIPLOCK PHOTO DAVID

10 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 227 of 323 11 WHISTLERTRAIL STANDARDS

TTF CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS

Trails with constructed Technical Trail Features (TTF) must exceed a minimum standard to protect the trail user. CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES Cross bracing of vertical members is required (figure 4). Also, TTFs SAFETY should not be mounted to living trees for the following reasons: TTFs must exceed the minimum strength and stability standard. Also, • The tree will continue to grow, compromising the integrity of the TTF. the finish must be such that if a rider were to fall, the structure or • The tree may sway due to wind, weakening the TTF. other protrusions would not increase the degree of the injury. • Nailing to live trees is harmful to the tree. STRENGTH AND STABILITY CONNECTED MEMBERS Each span of the TTF must be capable of withstanding a centered The methods for joining members in order vertical load of 225 kg (495 lb, 2 times heaviest rider/bike and gear). of preference is: nuts and bolts, lag bolts, Every single rung should be capable of holding a rider/bike and wood screws or ardox nails. Ensure two- gear’s weight. thirds of nail or screw’s length penetrates the stringer. Loading on a member should TTF DESIGN PHILOSOPHY be done in such a way as not to rely • Gateways: exclusively on the shear strength of the ➞By placing a narrow section or difficult turn early while the TTF is joining method. still close to the ground (known as a gateway), inexperienced riders may dismount prior to the TTF getting too high above the ground BRIDGE RUNG SPACING where the rider is more likely to be injured should a fall occur. For Deck rungs must be placed tightly so that example, place a 10 cm wide gateway 40 cm off the ground as a FIGURE 4 BRIDGE STRINGER SUPPORT children will not catch their feet between gateway to a 30 cm wide section 1.2 m off the ground. AND CROSS BRACING rungs, arms will not fit between rungs and all users including dogs • Make the highest difficulty section visible from the entry: will use bridges as opposed to walking adjacent to the bridge, ➞By placing the difficult section in view, the rider can make an compromising the sensitive area the bridge was intended to protect. informed decision before they may get into trouble with a TTF that An appropriate spacing between rungs is 3 cm to promote drainage of may be beyond their ability. water and mud. Overhang rungs past stringers by less than 5 cm (2 in) ➞Avoid wide, easy entrances leading to high, narrow (figure 5). exposed features BRIDGE SURFACING TTF HEIGHT AND WIDTH Stringer It is recommended that wood As outlined in the Technical Trail Difficulty section, maximum height surfaces with a slope exceeding 10°, and minimum width are dependent on the TTFs difficulty. As the Rung with the exception of split wood height above the ground increases, the consequence of injury in the Rung spacing 3cm having a rough surface finish, have case of a fall increases. an applied anti-slip surface. One Rung overhang <5cm recommended material is expanded Height is measured vertically to the lowest point within 1.0 m adjacent diamond lath. Chicken wire and to TTF (figure 2). Tread width is the amount of flat tread (figure 3). rolled roofing material, although popular, are not durable and roofing material traps moisture promoting Log Diameter premature rotting. Note: TTFs must be reinforced to 1.0m FIGURE 3 Tread withstand the additional loading of TREAD WIDTH Width anti-slip surfaces against the MEASUREMENT direction of the braking forces. Height FIGURE 5 BRIDGE RUNG SPACING, WOOD PREPARATION RUNG OVERHANG Bark must be stripped off and wood in contact with the earth should be isolated to minimize rotting. For natural rot resistant wood, use cedar.

FIGURE 2 MEASUREMENT OF TTF HEIGHT

12 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 228 of 323 13 WHISTLERTRAIL STANDARDS

FALL ZONE GUIDELINES SIGN GUIDELINES

Riding a mountain bike on trails and technical trail features involves Signs are a necessary component of trail management. They provide the user with information that will allow challenging oneself and with that challenge comes risk of injury. them to make an informed and educated choice. The hierarchy of signs in Whistler will be comprised of three Challenges come from terrain that contains many natural and man levels. The first is a Trail Network Sign kiosk that contains a map, general information about the area and safety made features. Risk is relative to riders skill level in relation to the suggestions. The second level is a Trailhead Sign that would contain information specific to the trail. Third, En difficulty of the trail. Route Signs along the trail to promote confidence in the user that they are following the correct route and to be posted on features that are a higher difficult rating than the trail rating. FALL ZONE The fall zone is the area adjacent to the technical trail feature, bottom TRAIL NETWORK SIGN of descents and the outside of corners that the rider may deviate into. Located at a parking lot or similar entrance to a network of trails. Information for trail network signs may contain a To help reduce the incidence and severity of injuries, fall zones combination of the following: should be reviewed for hazards. Hazard mitigation efforts can be • Topographical map of area limited to those items that can be reasonably expected to be reshaped • IMBA rules of the trail or removed using hand tools while maintaining the natural • Safety characteristics of the terrain surrounding the trail. 1. Ride on open trails only 1. Ride in 3’s 2. Leave no trace 2. Carry a flashlight METHODS 3. Control your bicycle 3. Carry a foil emergency blanket Methods to reduce risk in fall zones (1.5 m to each side of the trail) 4. Always yield trail 4. Let someone know your route, time of return and carry a include but are not limited to: 5. Never spook animals two-way communication device. • Cutting or digging out any sharp objects 6. Plan ahead 5. Wear a helmet • Trimming tree branches to branch shoulder (see figure 1) • Trail etiquette • Notes about keeping dogs out of fish bearing streams and • Covering of hazards is another option if material such as rotten logs, 1. Stay on trail, no ride-a-rounds educational components bark, mulch, dirt, etc. is available 2. Do not alter trail • Information on who to contact with trail maintenance concerns ➞Areas where falls are frequent may need periodic re-covering 3. Ride don’t slide or how to get involved • Dulling of sharp points or edges of exposed rocks 4. Avoid riding in muddy conditions • Acceptable trail user groups 5. Know your limits • Emergency contact phone numbers NOTE The fall zone need not be cleared of all foliage; the purpose of 6. Support trail maintenance • Description of cell phone coverage fall zone guidelines is to reduce the chance of injury should a fall • Background information on the surrounding area and trails occur. Replanting of the fall zone with a durable locally occurring • Trail maps for distribution species may be considered. • Bulletin board • Reference to web or other resource FOCUS The primary focus for fall zone clearing should be on trails rated ‘More Difficult’. Riders may be learning to ride TTFs and their TRAILHEAD SIGN fall recovery may not be perfected. These signs are to be located at the entrance(s) of a particular trail to provide the user with the information necessary to make an informed and educated decision whether to proceed or not. SUGGESTED INFORMATION OPTIONAL INFORMATION • Trail name • Trail difficulty rating and a written explanation of what • Topographical map of trail the user may encounter on the trail • Trail length • Warning and quantity of higher difficulty TTFs if • Elevation gain and loss present • Use at own risk disclaimer • Conditions subject to change • Inspect TTFs prior to riding DETAILS • Time range to complete Sign size 140 mm X 370 mm. Selected to be mounted • Trail profile without overhang on 150 mm X 150 mm posts (figure 6). • Disclaimer – most trails will be a level or two harder to ride when slippery BONNIE MAKAREWICZ PHOTO

14 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 229 of 323 15 WHISTLERTRAIL STANDARDS MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES EN ROUTE SIGN CONSTRUCTION Located along the trail indicating to the user they are still on the desired trail and/or give warning of the higher difficulty of an or new trails, the RMOW will use an experienced trail builder upcoming TTF. En route signs express difficulty in three ways: shape F for the trail alignment and follow the supporting guidelines of sign, color of sign and trail profile symbol on the sign. The signs are and standards. labeled with the trail name to distinguish between different trails. • En route signs to be placed at junctions with alternate trails giving TRAIL RATING clear indication of each trails’ direction. Use difficulty symbol and The trail and each feature along the trail is reviewed and measured to trail name with a reflective white border. determine its difficulty. The details and difficulty level of each feature • For TTFs rated a higher difficulty than the trail rating, en route signs need to be recorded. The trail may be rated as low as the average to be posted as warning. Use difficulty symbol and trail name with a feature difficulty or as high as the highest feature’s difficulty, bearing reflective yellow border. If feature can not be safely walked, an in mind all features rated at a higher difficulty than the trail’s rating easier signed bypass route must be provided (figure 6). must be individually signed. If the feature can not be safely walked, • If appropriate, signs may be placed at intervals to guide user. the feature must have an easier, signed bypass route. The trailhead • Consider reflective signs for night use. sign must also inform the user that there are higher difficulty features. DETAILS For en route signs marking higher difficulty features, it is TRAIL MAINTENANCE important for the sign to be highly visible. Place sign approximately 1.0-1.5 m above tread. Trail maintenance is an integral part of managing trails. In general, FIGURE 6 TRAILHEAD & EN ROUTE SIGNS high use trails and trails in environmentally sensitive areas require a greater level of maintenance and an expedited response to trail deterioration. Trails with man-made TTFs also require more frequent inspection. MAINTENANCE PRIORITIES The RMOW will inspect municipal trails as follows: • HIGH PRIORITY TRAILS will be inspected twice a year (April and July). These include all Type I trails, all trails in PAN 1 environments and trails with known constructed TTFs. • MEDIUM PRIORITY TRAILS will be inspected in the

RIVER RUNS 1.5 m THROUGHIT spring of each year or prior to the start of the trail use season. These include all trails in PAN 2 and PAN 3 environments and all Type II trails.

BART’S DARK TRAIL • LOW PRIORITY TRAILS will be inspected in the spring of 1.0 m each year or prior to the start of the trail use season. These include all remaining mountain bike trails.

All inspections and maintenance must be documented. INSPECTION TO INCLUDE Review of the trail; • for safety; • to verify difficulty designation. Review of signs; • for presence and condition. Review of constructed features; • for structural integrity. Trailhead sign En Route sign 150 mm X 150 mm post 100 mm X 100 mm post

16 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 230 of 323 17 WHISTLERTRAIL STANDARDS TERMINOLOGY

MAINTENANCE TRIGGERS A-FRAME – two ramps (approach and exit) placed together with no level section at the apex. Typically used to bridge deadfall across the trail. Triggers for trails requiring additional maintenance: BERM – built up bank on the outside of a corner to improve cornering. • TTFs deteriorating. BOARDWALK - a raised walkway made of boards; used to traverse sensitive areas; similar to bridge. • Short-cutting of climbing turns and/or switchbacks. BRIDGE – a structure that is built above and across a river or other obstacle allowing passage across or over obstacle. • Trail drifting or sliding down the hill. • Vegetation cover loss. DANGER – likely to cause harm or result in injury. • Trail proliferation (widening or braiding). DROP-OFF – a drop in the trail, possibly at the end of a log or off a rock; may require a technique depending on the vertical drop and/or • Trail incision and soil loss (ruts exceeding 15 cm depth). the angle of descent. EN ROUTE – on the way. GRANDFATHER CLAUSE EXPOSURE – placing a rider in the position or location that an error in balance or maneuvering may result in an injury; for example, a narrow In the case of valued existing trails in protected areas when trail bridge above rocks would be exposure and the greater the elevation of the bridge above the rocks, the greater the level of exposure. deactivation is unlikely to succeed, trail management becomes the FACE – the steep exposed side of a rock. preferred option. When considering the Grandfather Clause as an option, evaluate the continuing cost of maintenance to manage the FALL-AWAY – a drop-off which incorporates a turn in the trail. trail. A trail deactivation/closure may not be successful if the trail has GAP JUMP – two ramps placed back to back with a space between them, the rider must travel with enough velocity to cross the space and been established, is well used, and no alternative route is proposed. land on the second ramp. The resulting damage may be worse than had the trail remained open GATEWAY – a qualifier placed before a trail or TTF; for example, a 2x4 placed before an elevated bridge or a difficult corner. If the rider and effectively managed. can successfully negotiate the more difficult gateway, then they will likely be able to negotiate the TTF. TRAIL DEACTIVATION GRANDFATHER CLAUSE – provision exempting certain pre-existing trails from the requirements of a new regulation. JUMP – a wedge shaped feature built with the intention of sending the rider airborne. There may be a number of reasons for deactivating an existing trail. When considering deactivation of a trail, take into account; LADDER – a TTF with rungs attached to sides (stringers) made of metal, wood or rope, used for climbing up or down. • Is the trail popular? LOGJAM – a pile of logs placed near perpendicular to trail to make a ramp, usually placed in front of and behind deadfall to ease passage. • Is the level of impact acceptable or can it be made acceptable by MACHINE BUILT – constructed with the use of an excavator. management? • Can the trail or part of the trail be rerouted to improve the situation? MANDATORY AIR – a TTF requiring a wheelie drop or other advanced technique to exit due to a steep or undercut exit. • Are there suitable alternatives for users if the trail was deactivated? MANUAL – technique used to lift the front end of a bike up without the use of a pedal stroke; can be used off mandatory airs, etc.; • Is the trail historically significant? generally requires more forward momentum than a wheelie drop. PAN – Protected Area Network, sometimes know worldwide as greenways, environmental corridors, landscape linkages, wildlife Alternates to trail deactivation: corridors or riparian buffers. • Management of trail use. RAMP – any inclined structure, typically used as an approach to or exit from a TTF. A ramp can also be a jump. ➞Temporary closures RHYTHM SECTION – series of gap jumps placed end to end. Most technical form of jumping due to skill, timing, technique and ➞Reroute sections of trail failure consequence. ➞Exclusion of damaging users • Education of users with signs or other education initiatives. RIPARIAN ZONE/AREA – land between the water and the high water mark on the riverbanks. Riparian areas typically exemplify a rich and diverse vegetative mosaic reflecting the influence of water. When considering deactivation of trails, steps must include the ROLLABLE – a section that can be ridden without requiring higher-level rider skills; for example, an elevated bridge intersection/corner following: that can be ridden without having to hop and rotate. • Consult user groups. ROLL OVER – usually a rock that gets steeper the farther the rider advances, to the point where stopping may not be an option and the • Public notice. rider must continue despite not being prepared for what’s ahead. • Monitoring to ensure trail remains deactivated. TABLETOP – two jumps back to back with the void between the jumps filled in with dirt, creating the tabletop. And may include: • Signs informing users of reasons for closure. TEETER-TOTTER – a TTF consisting of a long plank balanced on a central support for riders to cross over, providing an down motion as the rider passes over the pivot. • Fences. TONGUE – a steep ramp on the exit of a TTF, often as an easier alternative to mandatory air. TOP-OF-THE-BANK – the highest elevation of land, which confines to their channel waters flowing in an intermittent or perennial stream or river. TREAD – the traveled surface of the trail. TTF – Technical Trail Feature – an obstacle on the trail requiring negotiation, the feature can be either man made or natural, such as an elevated bridge or a rock face respectively. WHEELIE DROP – technique used to pedal off drops-off or logs with the back wheel landing before the front wheel. BONNIE MAKAREWICZ PHOTO

18 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 231 of 323 19 NOTES

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 20 Page 232 of 323 TRAIL RISK MANAGEMENT

Prior to considering how risk management will benefit and protect various jurisdictions it is important to consider and understand our basic responsibilities and where these obligations are found.

Although some laws and regulations are targeted to specific entities and individuals, legal liability is an exposure to accidental losses than can cost a single jurisdiction significant funds. Each jurisdiction is no different than a private company or a member of the public when analyzing exposures to legal liability and other risks.

Legal Duties & Obligations

Understanding legal principles is not just for lawyers. Everyone needs to have a basic understanding of law and the obligations imposed on individuals and organizations. Knowing where to obtain this information is important to the successful management of liability.

In Canada, individuals, business and government, are exposed to a number of defined legal liabilities

Common Law

Is a set of principles generally applicable to all, derived from prior judicial rulings and precedents. For example "the thin skull doctrine"

Statutory Law

Consists of the enactment of legislative law and administrative regulations by provincial, national and local government a body, i.e. the Occupiers Liability Act, the Motor Vehicle Act and various environmental acts to name but only a few.

Civil Law / Tort Law

A breach of a duty owed to society in general; such as to keep the peace or to refrain from monopoly or water pollution including the duty owed which arises out of a contract.

In Common Law the principles of Duty of Care including the duty to warn, are well established by the courts. The Reasonable Persons Test is another principle that has been defined over the years in our judicial system as a method to measure how one would / could respond to a set of circumstances in comparison to another person.

Recent court decisions have reaffirmed "Policy as a Reasonable Defense" for local government. Policy is based on the ability to provide a service based on financial abilities, resources and the service to be provided.

In Civil Law each jurisdiction is exposed to issues involving environmental laws and regulations.

Under each category involving law and legal issues, it is always best to seek the input of

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 233 of 323 your legal counsel.

Local Government Perception and Expectation

The cost of providing extensive wilderness trails to meet the needs of the various users can be an expensive undertaking by local government. In addition, other problems can arise when the trail system involves other jurisdictions and private landowners.

It is the elected officials of local government whose position it is to be, not only the voice of the community for services, but it is also the community's overall authority for the expenditure of community funds based on a priority and needs basis.

Considering the position of elected officials, which is no different than private industry executives, funds and resources are limited and are allocated on a priority basis. It is therefore critical to maintain documentation relative to the activity as a method and means of support in your quest for funds and resources. The documentation can also serve as a legal defense in some cases. Without documentation it is difficult to provide evidence that you have complied with your policy and that you have taken reasonable actions to prevent accidental loss.

Local governments also rely upon volunteers to provide a number of services. Volunteers are a valuable tool. These individuals are an asset to the community, when they are trained and provided with the appropriate guidelines, training and support. If they are not provided with guidance, training and support, they are a liability to the community and they may be exposed to personal injury. Injuries to volunteers are another risk management issue that should also be addressed in the assessment of the service to be provided. Are the volunteers entitled to benefits arising from an injury which may occur?

From a risk management perspective it is important to identify local government's perception of the service and their expectations of how the service will be provided. These perceptions and expectations include financial abilities and needs, combined with staff resources and volunteer resources.

Public Perception and Expectation

Whether you are designing or operating a trail system, or some other recreational activity, it is critical to identify who the users are, their abilities, skills and the level of activity they perceive and expect to enjoy.

The public's perception and expectations are simply that they will attend, participate and leave without injury or problem. If the public is to receive instruction and / or directions, they will rely upon you 100% for advise, instruction and / or direction. The public will also rely upon you and your staff, as well as volunteers, to advise them of any potential hazard that they are unaware of. Do not assume that all users can easily identify a hazard.

Facilities and Equipment

The next step in the identification and analysis of expectations and service to be provided, is what types of facilities are provided and what equipment is required for the service.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 234 of 323 For facilities it is important to determine the current condition of the facilities, the need of the facilities and do these facilities meet or exceed any currently published standards or internal standards established by the jurisdiction. These facilities may include parking lots, trail kiosks, washrooms, the wilderness trail etc.

Equipment includes bridges, signs, fencing etc. What condition is the equipment in? Does the equipment meet or exceed any standard? If there is no standard applicable to the activity, is there a standard that can be found which may be applicable or which can be used as a guideline? For example, if stairs are to be built in the trail system, how do they compare to the Building Code? When analyzing equipment it is important to determine whether or not there is sufficient equipment to meet the needs of the users.

Once the identification process is complete, the evaluation of the service provided can best be undertaken in a number of ways. For example a survey of users to determine who is using the trail system, what they like, what they don't like and what would they like in the future, to name a few questions. In addition, it is equally important to determine the current frequency of maintenance and inspection as well as other management issues of the trail system to ensure that all critical areas of the trail program have been reviewed and meet the standards established by the jurisdiction.

This review process should cover everything from operating instructions and contractual obligations to guidelines for staff and volunteer resources, including their training. Risk Management is not only concerned with legal liability, therefore an analysis of various job tasks to prevent injury to personnel should be reviewed as well as property loss exposures and environmental concerns must be reviewed. Other benefits from this analysis will include budget and man power assessments including prevention of fines from Workers Compensation as well as civil actions and fines.

Risk Management can not prevent all accidents from occurring, however, good risk management can control exposures to loss.

An extensive review from a risk management perspective can be time consuming however in the long run this process will save money. Risk Management does not end at this point. An annual review of issues and implemented programmes is necessary to ensure that procedures and guidelines are continually met. Technology, Mother Nature and personnel, as well as users, will change over time. It is therefore important to monitor risk management plans and activities to ensure that guidelines and operating policies remain relevant to the activity.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 235 of 323 Request for Decision

Septic Easement Agreement for Britannia Beach

Date: March 24, 2009

Recommendation: THAT the Board Authorise the Septic Easement Agreement in favour of Britannia Oceanfront Developments Corporation and MacDonald Development Corporation, and that the Chair & CAO be authorised to execute the agreement.

CAO Comments: I Concur. PRE

Who Votes: All Directors – one vote

Recommendation Report/Document: Attached X Available __ Nil Key Issue(S)/Concepts Defined: William A. Randall of McLachlan Brown Anderson requests the SLRD sign the Septic Easement Agreement [attached], as recommended by Michael Quattrocchi of Young, Anderson.

Relevant Policy: Electoral D Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw Schedule A, Part 3, Division 2, Section 3.2.1

Strategic Relevance: N/A

Desired Outcome(S): N/A

Response Options: 1. Sign the Septic Easement Agreement as it is written. 2. Do not sign the Septic Easement Agreement. 3. No other options identified.

Preferred Strategy: Response option 1.

Implications Of Recommendation General: Currently the sewer system of the Britannia Mining Museum drains into a septic tank within Lot C (owned by SLRD – see attached site plan). Britannia Oceanfront Developments Corporation and MacDonald Development Corporation (the Grantees) request an easement through Lot C to allow for maintenance of the existing septic system. There is a stipulation in the agreement that should the existing system be abandoned, the Grantees will file a discharge of this Agreement and leave the Servient lands in the condition required under the Agreement (section 4(l)).

Under the Electoral D Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw Schedule A, Part 3, Division 2, Section 3.2.1.1 it is stated that a subdivision will not be permitted until a master sewage collection and disposal plan has been approved by the Regional District Board. Future development by the Grantees will require connecting to the new waste water treatment plant and abandoning of the septic system per this Agreement.

The new waste water treatment plant was designed to handle the anticipated effluent from the developed sites of the Britannia Oceanfront Developments Corporation Commercial Development Area and Museum Interpretive Centre. A Latecomers

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 236 of 323 Request for Decision

Septic Easement Agreement for Britannia Beach

Agreement currently in the works with Britannia Bay Properties LTD. addresses the costs associated with the over-sizing of certain systems to treat the increased levels of effluent.

Organizational: None

Financial: $1.00 to the SLRD

Legal: None

Follow Up Action: Ensure that during subdivision approval stage that the application identifies strategies to tie into the new WWTP (Electoral D Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw Schedule A, Part 3, Division 2, Section 3.2.1) and to abandon the septic tank per specifications in this agreement section 4(l).

Communication: Return signed copies to W.A. Randall of McLachlan Brown Anderson.

Other Comments:

Submitted by: Janis Netzel, Senior Engineering Technologist Reviewed by: CAO Approved by: CAO

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 237 of 323 Legend Copyright/Disclaimer Key Map of British Columbia Britannia Beach WWTP Datum/Projection: NAD83, Albers Equal Area Conic 0Scale: 1:5,000 70The material contained in this web site is owned by the Government of British Columbia and protected by copyright law. It may not be reproduced or redistributed without the prior written permission of Province British Columbia. To request permission to reproduce 140 m. all or part of the material on this web site please complete the Copyright Permission Request Form which can be accessed through the Copyright Information Page. CAUTION: Maps obtained using this site are not designed to assist in navigation. These maps may be generalized and may not reflect current conditions. Uncharted hazards may exist. DO NOT USE THESE MAPS FOR NAVIGATIONAL PURPOSES.

49-37-45 N 49-37-40 N 49-37-35 N 49-37-30 N 49-37-25 N 49-37-20 N Page 238 of 323 123-12-0 W 123-12-10 W 123-12-10 W 123-12-20 W 123-12-20 W 123-12-30 W 123-12-30 W 123-12-40 W 123-12-40 W

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009

49-37-45 N 49-37-45 N 49-37-40 N 49-37-35 N 49-37-30 N 49-37-25 N 49-37-20 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 239 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 240 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 241 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 242 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 243 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 244 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 245 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 246 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 247 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 248 of 323 Request for Decision

TUP #16, Canadian Snowmobile, (Callaghan Valley)

Date: April 16, 2009

Recommendation:

1. THAT Temporary Use Permit No. 16 be amended as follows:

a. clause 4b is amended to better reflect the intent of the Riparian Area Regulations and make reference to the ravine that Callaghan Creek is flowing through; b. clause 4k is amended to exclude the Department of National Defence temporary security tents and buildings from design guidelines; c. clause 4m is amended to reflect SPCA best management practices that are currently in place (dogs are kept in enclosures rather than chained to dog houses); and, d. clause 4n is amended to provide more detail on the site reclamation.

2. THAT Temporary Use Permit No. 16 be issued for a period of two years.

CAO Comments: I concur with the recommendations. PRE.

Who Votes: All

Recommendation Report/Document: Attached _X_ Available __ Nil __

Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined: The Department of Nation Defence (DND) has identified Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Ltd’s (CSA) staging area in the Callaghan Valley as a preferred location for basing security personnel during the 2010 Olympics. CSA has submitted a temporary use permit (TUP) application to 1) allow use of the site for a DND security base camp during the 2010 Olympics, and 2) to extend use of the area for dog sled tours for an additional two years.

Relevant Policy: Electoral Area D OCP Bylaw No. 495, 1994; Zoning Bylaw 20, 1970

Strategic Relevance: n/a

Desired Outcome(s): Land use management that is consistent with SLRD Board policy.

Response Options: 1. Issue TUP #16 for a period of two years. 2. Issue TUP #16 for a specified amount of time. 3. Revise the content of TUP #16 and issue for a specified amount of time. 4. Refer that application back to staff for more information, or revisions to the TUP, prior to further consideration.

Preferred Strategy: 1. Issue TUP #16 for a period of two years.

Implications Of Recommendation

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 249 of 323 Request for Decision

TUP #16, Canadian Snowmobile, (Callaghan Valley)

General: TUP #16 will result in the DND basing their security personnel in the Callaghan Valley, which is their preferred location for security purposes. The footprint of the existing TUPs on the subject property will be expanded, and the licenses to cut will also require modification. No significant visual impacts from the Callaghan Valley Road are expected.

Organizational: n/a

Financial: n/a

Legal: n/a

Follow Up Action: The TUP will be issued to the applicant (subject to the Board’s resolution to do so).

Communication: The applicant will be notified my email and mail.

Other Comments: n/a

Submitted by: Planner, Amica Antonelli Reviewed by: Director of Planning and Development, Steve Olmstead Approved by: CAO, Paul Edgington

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 250 of 323 Request for Decision

TUP #16, Canadian Snowmobile, (Callaghan Valley)

Background:

On March 6, 2009 CSA submitted a TUP application requesting that a base camp for the 2010 Olympics security personnel be permitted on their recreation tenure in the Callaghan Valley. Also, a continuation of the existing dog kennel and dog sled tour staging activities was requested. The subject property is located at approximately kilometer six on the Callaghan Forest Service Road. Two years is the proposed term of the TUP, however, the security base camp would only be used from November 1, 2009 to April 15, 2010. The kennel and dog sled tour facilities are already constructed and under use. The security base camp would require: additional land clearing for tents and temporary buildings to house and service up to 140 people, a drilled well, temporary washroom facilities, snowmobile storage, some road building, and, bringing electricity to the site.

License of Occupation # 2407109 authorizes CSA’s use of the site for commercial recreation activities. Concurrently with the TUP processing, amendments to the License of Occupation are being made for the security base camp.

This TUP application is time sensitive. In addition to processing the TUP, an amendment to their license to cut is required prior to construction beginning in the late spring of 2009.

Zoning & OCP: The subject property is currently zoned Rural 1 under Zoning Bylaw 20, 1970. Camp grounds, dog kennels, and intensive use base camps are not permitted uses under this zoning, hence the TUP application. The OCP designates the subject property as Special Study Area, where resource management and outdoor recreation are the only uses permitted. The site is also designated as a development permit area for protection of the environment and control of form and character of buildings. Development permits are not required where a TUP is issued; however, the conditions of TUP #16 are intended to reflect the requirements of the development permit area.

Existing TUPs: Two TUPs have been issued to CSA for the subject property:

TUP Expiry Date Deposit Permitted Use TUP # 11 Apr 2009 (1 year) $5000 Dog sled tours & associated activities TUP # 12 Aug 2010 (2 years) $7000 Snowmobile tours & associated activities TUP # 16 - Proposed Apr 2011 (2 years) $7000 Security base camp & dog sled tours & associated activities

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 251 of 323 Request for Decision

TUP #16, Canadian Snowmobile, (Callaghan Valley)

TUP #11 allows for dog kennels and check-in facilities. It was approved for one year and expires in April 2009. TUP #12 permits snowmobile tour staging facilities, maintenance sheds, storage areas, a warming hut, and caretaker and security buildings. It was approved for two years and expires in August 2010. As part of these earlier TUP processes, CSA provided the following:

1. a commitment to reducing green house gas emissions; 2. a commitment to assisting in the protection of the RMOW watershed; 3. a discussion of the company's history of responsible operations; and, 4. a plan for managing the sled dogs to prevent escapes, pollution, etc.

On April 6, 2009, staff carried out a site visit. It appears CSA has complied with the conditions of TUPs 11 & 12, as well as the commitments made in points 1 through 4 above.

Stakeholder consultation: As part of the TUP process, key stakeholders and neighbours (RMOW, the Lil’wat Nation, the Squamish Nation, and VANOC) were notified of the pending TUP and requested to comment. No comments were received.

Letter of credit: The value of the letter of credit for TUP #16 is $7000. This amount is $2000 more that the letter on file for TUP #11. This increase is based on the site reclamation plan provided by the applicant (attached).

Staff comments: A revised clause for riparian area protection (4b) is included in the recommendations to the Board. The revision is recommended to better reflect the Riparian Area Regulations and the nature of the site. There is a steep ravine where Callaghan Creek runs adjacent to the TUP site, which would not be adequately protected by a 30 meters buffer. Clause 4b should read 'No development or disturbance of vegetation may take place within 30 metres of a waterbody or 10 meters beyond the top of the ravine bank (as defined by the Riparian Area Regulations), whichever is greater.'

Staff are satisfied that the conditions of the TUP will ensure the proposed development will not affect visual quality as seen from the Callaghan Valley Road and assist in minimizing negative impacts to the environment. However, as documented in the tenure management plan, some adverse environmental effects may occur, including disruption of habitat use.

As part of a separate process, CSA does have plans to bring forward an application for permanent facilities. It should be noted that TUP #16 does not create any entitlement or permission for more permanent uses on the site, such as a lodge or accommodation.

During previous TUP processes in the Callaghan Valley it was noted that a comprehensive plan for the area was needed. As a result, the Area D OCP update is on the department work plan for 2009. It is not feasible to wait for the Area D OCP update to be completed prior to deciding on TUP #16 due to the time sensitive nature of the TUP application.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 252 of 323 Request for Decision

TUP #16, Canadian Snowmobile, (Callaghan Valley)

Respectfully submitted,

Amica Antonelli, Planner

Attachments: Memo from Canadian Snowmobiles re: care of dogs TUP #16 site remediation plan

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 253 of 323 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT TUP NO. 16

ISSUED TO: Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Ltd. 701 - 4282 Mountain Square Whistler, BC, V0N 1B4

1. This Temporary Use Permit is issued subject to compliance with all of the Bylaws of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District applicable thereto, except those specifically varied or supplemented by this Permit.

2. This Temporary Use Permit applies to those lands within the Squamish Lillooet Regional District described below and any and all buildings, structures, and other development thereon: Unsurveyed Crown land 6 kilometres up the Callaghan Forest Service Road, as shown on Schedule A (the ‘Property’).

3. In addition to the existing provisions of Squamish Lillooet Regional District Zoning Bylaw No. 20, 1970, or any bylaw replacing Bylaw No. 20, 1970, the following uses are permitted where indicated on Schedule A:

a. temporary tents and buildings (ATCO trailers, a 5th wheel, or other mobile buildings) for the purposes of accommodating a Department of National Defence security base camp associated with the 2010 Olympics; b. portable toilet facility (or similar structure); c. unpaved parking areas; d. dog sledding; and, e. temporary buildings (ATCO trailers, a 5th wheel, or other mobile buildings) for the purposes of accommodating up to 45 sled dogs, supplies, storage, and other activities directly associated with sled dog tours.

4. Uses permitted under section 3 of this permit shall be subject to the following conditions:

a) no significant cut and fills may be created; b) no new development or disturbance of vegetation may take place within 30 metres of a stream or 10 metres beyond the top of the ravine bank (as defined by the Riparian Area Regulations), whichever is greater;

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 254 of 323 c) disturbed sites shall be replanted with native species where possible; d) prior to land clearing a plant and wildlife survey shall be conducted by a Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP) of the areas to be cleared or impacted by clearing, to identify the location of active bird nests, important wildlife trees, and the presence of rare and endangered plant and animal species; e) where land clearing activity is proposed between April 1st and July 31st a QEP shall conduct a bird nest survey within seven days of the proposed clearing; f) in accordance section 34 of the Wildlife Act - which states that a bird or its egg, or the occupied nest of a bird or its egg, may not be destroyed - active nests shall be protected by a suitable buffer, as recommended by a QEP; g) notwithstanding section 4(f), the nest of an eagle, peregrine falcon, gyrfalcon, osprey, or heron shall be provided with a 50 metre buffer of undisturbed vegetation whether occupied or not; h) parking areas may not be paved and must be minimized in size to the least amount required for guest and employee parking; i) garbage and other waste shall be managed with bear proof bins; j) fuel storage on the property shall meet the standards specified in the Hazardous Waste Regulation (Environmental Protection Act) to provide protection from spills, vandalism, and fire hazard; k) temporary buildings (excluding those specifically constructed for the Department of National Defense security base camp) shall be modified to blend into the natural environment to the greatest extent feasible through exterior modifications, including removing the steel/corrugated siding and replacing it with natural wood siding and trim, and screening ancillary structures with vegetation; l) a vegetated buffer sufficient to screen all development from view of the Callaghan Valley Road must be retained; m) the design and construction of kennel facilities shall be carried out in consultation with the SPCA, and include the following: i. all animals are to be secured in an enclosure of a minimum of 75 square feet; ii. bedding in enclosures shall be changed daily and facilities should be cleaned daily; iii. kennel compounds shall have a minimum 6 feet high fence to secure the animals; iv. separate pens shall be provided for female dogs in heat and female dogs with litters;

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 255 of 323 v. all dog enclosures shall be maintained such that snow is cleared and the entryways are easily accessible for the animals; n) on the date of expiry of the temporary use permit the temporary use area shall be free of fuel contamination and restored as nearly as may reasonably be possible to the same condition as it was on the commencement date of the permit. Reclamation of the Department of National Defence security base camp must be carried out according to the Reclamation Plan dated March 17, 2009 and written by the Cascade Environmental Resource Group.

5. As a condition of the issuance of this Temporary Use Permit, the Regional District is holding security set out below to ensure that development is carried out in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Permit. Should any interest be earned upon the security, it shall accrue to the Permittee and be paid to the Permittee if the security is returned. The condition of posting of the security is that should the Permittee fail to carry out development hereby authorized according to the terms and conditions of this Temporary Use Permit, the Regional District may use the security to carry out the development permitted by this Temporary Use Permit. There is filed accordingly: a) An Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $7,000.00.

6. The land described herein shall be developed in strict accordance with the terms and conditions and provisions of this Temporary Use Permit.

7. This Temporary Use Permit expires on ______, 20--.

8. Any application to amend this Temporary Use Permit shall be considered a new application.

9. This Temporary Use Permit is not a building permit.

AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE BOARD

THIS DAY OF , 2009.

ISSUED THIS DAY OF , 2009.

Paul R. Edgington Chief Administrative Officer

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 256 of 323 Schedule A to TUP # 16

The yellow areas labelled ‘TUP Existing boundaries’ and green areas labelled ‘TUP 2010 Security Amendment’ denote lands permitted for use under TUP 16.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 257 of 323 Reclamation Plan for the Department of National Defence Callaghan Valley Staging Area DRAFT

DATE: March 17, 2009 TO: Amica Antonelli, Planner, SLRD CC: Alan Crawford, Canadian Snowmobile Adventures FROM: Dave Williamson, B.E.S., Principal Dan McDonald, M.E.M. RE: DND base camp reclamation FILE #: 056- 05-01

Introduction This memo is intended to provide a plan and cost estimate for reclamation of the DND staging area in the event that Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Ltd (CSA) re-zoning application for its operations base is declined.

These lands will be temporarily occupied by DND for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games. The staging area will occupy the current operations base of CSA. The staging area is located in the Callaghan Valley, approximately 5.3 km from Highway 99 and 2.8 km from the Whistler Olympic Park 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games Nordic Venue.

The intent of the reclamation is to create the appropriate conditions for the land to return to its original state via natural processes. This reclamation plan addresses the following procedures to be implemented in the snow free season following DND’s departure from the operations base in 2010:

1. Return of the site to its original surface condition (removal of gravels and / or drainage ditches) 2. Re-vegetation

Gravel used for drainage / pads / footpaths will be removed with CSA staff and equipment and used to improve existing paths and trails within CSA’s tenure. Re- vegetation works will be undertaken by CSA (staff has skills and experience in forestry planting works). Surface soils and vegetation removed for DND’s staging area will be stockpiled and re-used in the reclamation works.

Plants are sourced from Peel’s Nursery, a lower mainland specialist in native plants, and price quotes are from March 4, 2009. Plant selection is based on site visits in 2008 and 2009.

DND RECLAMATION PLAN | PREPARED FOR SLRD | File #056 05 01 | Date: March 17, 2009 1

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 258 of 323 Reclamation Area Profile The potential area for reclamation corresponds to that portion of CSA’s base of operations outside the approved license to cut permit #L47753 (see map). This area that will be affected by DND’s staging area is approximately 11,322 m2 / 1.13 ha.

This area consists of two distinct forest types: 1. single-storied Douglas-fir tree plantation (structural stage 4) 2. multi-storied mixed coniferous forest (structural stage 6)

Budget The table below provides an approximate budget for the reclamation plan. Planting density is assumed to be 1 conifer per 4 m2 and 1 shrub per 1 m2. For the reclamation area, this will require approximately 2830 conifers and 8500 shrubs.

Table 1 Reclamation plan costs Species Size Cost per unit Spacing Number Total Cost Scoulers’s willow Stake 0.32 1 m 3000 $960.00 Red-osier dogwood Plug 0.85 1 m 1500 $1,275.00 Oval-leaved blueberry Plug 0.85 1 m 1000 $850.00 Falsebox Plug 0.65 1 m 1000 $650.00 Salmonberry Plug 0.85 1 m 1000 $850.00 Red elderberry Plug 0.85 1 m 1000 $850.00 Western redcedar Plug 0.65 4 m 1080 $702.00 Douglas-fir Plug 0.65 4 m 1080 $702.00 Westerm hemlock Plug 0.65 4 m 1080 $702.00 Total (Plants) 11740 $7,541.00 Misc. Costs Machine Work May be required if culverts were installed and/or ditches require filling $1,000.00 Labour CSA in kind work - Sub-total $1,000.00 Total Approximate Reclamation Cost -- -$8,541.00

Please do not hesitate to contact myself or Dave Williamson should you have any questions or comments on this cost estimate.

Sincerely, Dan McDonald

Cascade Environmental Resource Group Ltd.

2 DND RECLAMATION PLAN | PREPARED FOR SLRD | File #056 05 01 | Date: March 17, 2009

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 259 of 323

Inlightoftherecentarticleinlastweek’sQuestionregardingdogsleddinginthevalley,weatCanadian wanttoensurethateveryoneunderstandshowwehaveraisedthebarinthisindustry!

AtCanadianDogsledAdventuresourdogsaretreatedtothebestlifeintheworld.Wehavecreatedan operationthatallothercompanieswillneedtostrivetomeetorexceedthebestpracticesthatwehave setasourstandards.

Hereareafewpointsthatillustratehow:

1. CurrentlywearetheonlycompanywithanonͲsitekennelwhichallowsourdogstobeintheir mostcomfortableenvironmentalways.

2. Weprovidelarge,covered,fencedinshelterswithpersonaldoghouses,tiledfloors,andshared interactivelivingspaceinthebeautifulCallaghanValley.

3. Ourdogsareverypersonable.Puppiesliveinwithpeopletogetthemaccustomedtothe generalpublic,andtheyareintermingledaswellͲ75%arespayedandneuteredtolimit populationandreducestress.

4. OnsitemedicalcheckͲups,visitsandvaccinationsareperformedregularlybyDr.Hoff,VMD. WearealsocurrentlyinvolvedinastudywiththeUniversityofSaskatchewan,Dr.Meghan Smart,PHD,toperfectandoptimizethedietrequiredforsleddogs.Forexample,breakfastisa warmstewofmostlychicken,rice,brothandkibble.

5. Ourhandlerslivewiththedogstoensurethesociology,psychologyandwellbeingofthedogsis closelymonitored.Modifications,adjustmentsandimprovementsareconstantlybeingmade. Weconsiderourselvespioneersinthetransformationoftheclassic‘workingdog’and‘musher’ to‘team’and‘coach’.Everydogisasfriendlyasahousepetbutstilldoingthejobofaworking dog.

6. Webelieveindoggydaysoff!

7. OurwelllovedcompositepackoftoughAlaskansandstrongPointerracingdogswerebredfor theirinherentdesiretorunwithendurance,strengthandspeed.Thedog’sjoyandanticipation isdisplayedbyhowling/barkingandgettingextremelyexcitedandhypertothepointthatthey vibrate(thinkofthebigpowderday)!

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 260 of 323

8. Allofthefeedbackreceivedfromothermushers,industryprofessionals,vetsetc.hasbeen positiveandencouraging.Canadian’sdogsledoperationandkennelintheCallaghanis100% citationfreewiththeSPCA.LauraLavine,SPCA,ishappytoansweryourquestionsat [email protected].

AtCanadianDogsledAdventures,wehavegonetogreateffortsandlargeexpensetoputourcompany aheadofthe‘pack’.Ifyouhaveaquestionaboutourpracticesweinviteyoutocomeseethekennels andspeakwithourteam,orbetteryetcomeoutononeofourtoursandexperienceourcustombuilt dogsledsingletrackthatwindsthroughtheoldgrowthforesttoAlexanderFalls.

Sincerely,

CraigBeattie GeneralManager CanadianSnowmobileandCanadianDogsledAdventuresLtd

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 261 of 323 British Columbia / Yukon Command The Royal Canadian Legion

“Military Service Recognition Book”

Dear Sir/Madam:

Thank you for your interest in the BC/Yukon Command / The Royal Canadian Legion, representing British Columbia and the Yukon’s Veterans. Please accept this written request for your support, as per our recent telephone conversation.

Our BC/Yukon Command Legion is very proud to be printing 15,000 copies of our Annual “Military Service Recognition Book” scheduled for release by Remembrance Day, 2009, to help identify and recognize many of the brave Veterans of British Columbia and the Yukon who served our Country so well during times of great conflict. This annual publication goes a long way to help the Legion in our job as the “Keepers of Remembrance”, so that none of us forget the selfless contributions made by our Veterans.

We would like to have your organization’s support for this Remembrance project by sponsoring an advertisement space in our “Military Service Recognition Book.” Proceeds raised from this important project will allow us to fund the printing of this unique publication and will also help our Command to improve our services to Veterans and the more then 150 communities that we serve throughout British Columbia and the Yukon. The Legion is recognized as one of Canada’s largest “Community Service” organizations, and we are an integral part of the communities we serve. This project ensures the Legion’s continued success in providing these very worthwhile services.

Please find enclosed a rate sheet for your review, along with a detailed list of some of the many community activities in our 156 Branches and 114 Ladies Auxiliaries in the BC/Yukon Command. Whatever you are able to contribute to this worthwhile endeavor would be greatly appreciated. For further information please contact BC/Yukon Command Office toll free at 1-800-964-9074.

Thank you for your consideration and/or support.

Sincerely,

Leon (Red) Thibodeau President

Visa/MastercardSLRD Regular Accepted Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Advertisements can be emailed Page to 262 : [email protected] of 323 British Columbia / Yukon Command The Royal Canadian Legion

“Military Service Recognition Book” Advertising Prices Ad Size Cost GST Total Full Colour Outside Back Cover $1,709.52 + $85.48 = $1,795.00 Inside Front/Back Cover (Full Colour) $1,519.05 + $75.95 = $1,595.00 Full Page (Full Colour) $1,423.81 + $71.20 = $1,495.00 Full Page $947.62 + $47.38 = $995.00 ½ Page (Full Colour) $809.52 + $40.48 = $850.00 ½ Page $566.67 + $28.33 = $595.00 ¼ Page (Full Colour) $500.00 + $25.00 = $525.00 ¼ Page $404.76 + $20.24 = $425.00 1/10 Page (Business Card) $238.10 + $11.90 = $250.00

G.S.T. Registration # R10 793 3913

All Business Card advertisements in the publication are printed in black and white only.

All typesetting and layout charges are included in the above prices.

A complimentary copy of this year’s publication will be received by all advertisers purchasing space of 1/10 page and up, along with a Certificate of Appreciation from the BC/Yukon Command.

PLEASE MAKE CHEQUE PAYABLE TO: BC/Yukon Command The Royal Canadian Legion (BC/Y RCL) (Campaign Office) P O Box 5555 Vancouver, BC V6B 4B5

Visa/MastercardSLRD Regular Accepted Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Advertisements can be emailed Page to 263 : [email protected] of 323 DEAR VALUED SUPPORTER:

Thank you for your pledge in support of British Columbia/Yukon Command, The Royal Canadian Legion’s “Military Service Recognition Book Project.” This annual publication will help identify and recognize many of the Veterans of British Columbia and the Yukon who served their country so well. The book will go a long ways to help the Legion in our job as “Keepers of Remembrance” so that none of us forget the selfless contributions made by our veterans. Copies of this publication will also be provided to public and private School Libraries in BC and the Yukon to be used as an education aid for our youth

There will be 15,000 copies of this book printed and distributed free of charge in communities throughout BC and the Yukon. Proceeds raised from this project will be used by the Legion to improve services to Veterans and the more than 150 Communities we serve.

The Royal Canadian Legion plays an active role in communities throughout BC and the Yukon. With 156 Branches and 110 Ladies Auxiliaries in British Columbia and the Yukon there’s not a citizen within our Command whose life isn’t touched by The Royal Canadian Legion. The tragedy for the Legion is that often times the public isn’t aware of the extent of our work. We have a history of working hard and not really publicizing our contributions. Who we are and what do we do? The more than 80,000 members of The Royal Canadian Legion BC/Yukon Command are dedicated to assisting Veterans and their families. We are also equally dedicated to assisting those in need within our communities, whether it is seniors or our youth.

Funding - The government does not fund The Royal Canadian Legion. We rely on our member’s dues, donations from the public and in-house fund raising activities. How do we help seniors and youth within our communities! ¾ Since 1956 provide affordable housing numbering in the thousands for seniors throughout BC/Yukon with a construction cost of over $168,000,000 and a current value many times that amount. ¾ Provide “assisted living” accommodation for those needing the extra care. Presently this type of accommodation numbers in the hundreds of units with at least four new complexes under construction. ¾ Support our communities by paying in excess of one millions dollars in yearly property taxes

The Legion combined with our Foundation donates:

¾ Over half a million dollars annually within BC/Yukon in support of electric beds and lifts, wheelchairs and specialty mattresses, specialized medical equipment, therapeutic gardens, buses and even furnishings and television sets to our hospitals and extended care facilities. ¾ Half a million dollars raised by the 5000 Ladies Auxiliary members for charities and deserving branch projects ¾ Over $350,000 on Youth Programs, sponsoring a variety of sports teams. ¾ Over $275,000 in Bursaries and Scholarships awarded ¾ Sponsor over 5,000 cubs, scouts, guides and cadets ¾ $16,500 annually to send young BC athletes and coaches to a Legion-sponsored National Athletic camp and to fund local events ¾ $60,000 annually to the Department of Family Practice at UBC. Over 200 family doctors have graduated since inception in 1978, most of these are in practice in BC, including a large number in rural areas ¾ Sponsor Transition programs at UBC and the University of Victoria for our veterans and their families suffering with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder ¾ Sponsor “Spinoza Bear” program throughout BC for children suffering with serious illness or stress related disorders ¾ Over half a million dollars from poppy funds to ex-service personnel and their dependants in need

The Legion at work in your community!

Again, we thank you for your sponsorship and support of this very worthwhile project.

Sincerely,

Leon (Red) Thibodeau President CANADIAN

Visa/MastercardSLRD Regular Accepted Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Advertisements can be emailed Page to : [email protected] of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 265 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 266 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 267 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 268 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 269 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 270 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 271 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 272 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 273 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 274 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 275 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Minutes March 23, 2009; 10:30 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC

In Attendance:

Board: R. Oakley (Area A); S. Gimse (Area C); T. Milner (Alternate, Whistler); M. Macri (Area B); P. Heintzman (Squamish); J. Turner (Area D); G. Gardner (Squamish); K. Anderson (Alternate, Lillooet); J. Sturdy (Pemberton)

Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; L. Lloyd, Director of Administrative Services; S. Lafrance, Director of Finance; P. DeJong, Policy Analyst; S. Cheng, Administrative Assistant (Recording Secretary)

Others: L. Scroggins (Delegate); 6 members of the public and 1 member of the press

1 Call to Order

The meeting was called to order at 10:30 AM.

2 Approval of Agenda

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the agenda be approved as circulated.

CARRIED

3 Committee Reports and Recommendations

Consider out of Sequence

It was moved and seconded:

THAT item 4.1.5 - Rezoning at Blackwater be considered out of order.

CARRIED

4.1.5 Bylaw 1128 – Rezoning at Blackwater Creek (Area C)

It was moved and seconded:

1. THAT, as per the direction of the Board at the February 23, 2009 meeting, Bylaw No. 1128, cited as ‘SLRD Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002,

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 276 of 323 This is page 2 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

Amendment Bylaw No 1128, 2009’ be introduced and read a first time.

CARRIED

It was moved and seconded:

2. THAT Bylaw No. 1128 be referred to the Lil’wat Nation, Lower Stl’atl’imx Tribal Council, Village of Pemberton, and provincial agencies for comment.

CARRIED

3.1 Electoral Area Directors Committee Recommendations of March 9, 2009:

1. Development Variance Permit #79 Britannia Beach - Matheson

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the Squamish Lillooet Board of Directors approve a Development Variance Permit for Lot 131, DL 891, NWD, Plan BCP20004 to allow a relaxation to the side yard setback from 1.5m to 1.29m and that the issuance of the permit be authorized. CARRIED

2. Emergency Programme Budget (1761)

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the Emergency Programme budget be approved. CARRIED

3. 2009 - 2013 Financial Plan - Area C Cost Centres

It was moved and seconded:

THAT items 3.1.3 to 3.1.5 be moved:

THAT the following budgets be approved:

a) Anderson Lake Refuse Grounds ( 1905) b) Birken Fire Protection (1713) c) Birken Recreation Commission (2102) d) D’Arcy/Devine/Birkenhead Lake Refuse Grounds (1904) e) D’Arcy Street Lighting (1803) f) D’Arcy Water System (2707)

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 277 of 323 This is page 3 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

4. Pemberton North Water (2702) THAT the Pemberton North Water budget be approved.

5. Walkerville Dyking (2401) THAT the Walkerville Dyking budget be approved. CARRIED

3.2 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Recommendations of March 9, 2009:

It was moved and seconded: THAT Items 3.2.1 to 3.2.3 be moved:

1. Pemberton and District Library Budget THAT the Pemberton & District Library budget be approved as presented.

2. Pemberton Community Centre Budget THAT the Pemberton Community Centre budget be approved as presented.

3. SLRD South 911 Fire Dispatch THAT the SLRD South 911 Fire Dispatch be included in the 2009-2013 Financial Plan. CARRIED

3.3 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Recommendations of March 4, 2009:

Pemberton & District Search and Rescue Budget (1705)

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the Pemberton & District Search and Rescue budget be approved as presented;

AND THAT the Pemberton & District Search and Rescue 2008 Financial Statement be received before dispersal of funds. CARRIED

3.4 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Recommendations of February 24, 2009:

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 278 of 323 This is page 4 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

It was moved and seconded: THAT items 3.4.1 thru 3.4.8 be moved:

1. Pemberton & District Search and Rescue Budget (1705) 1. THAT Staff re-evaluate the Budget process and formulate recommendations to the Board for the 2010 Financial Plan.

2. THAT Laura Downs be invited to the next Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee meeting to explain Budget Request for Pemberton Search and Rescue.

2. Pemberton & District Library Budget (2502) 1. THAT Staff prepare a Service Establishment bylaw amendment which would increase the requisition limit of the Pemberton & District Library service by 25 %.

2. THAT Staff prepare an analysis of maintenance, operating and building costs of the Library’s share of the building, and that it be reflected in the 5 year operating plan.

3. Pemberton Recreation Commission Budget (2100) THAT $36,000 be the 2009 requisition amount for the Pemberton Recreation Commission.

4. Pemberton & District Museum (2202) 1. THAT the Pemberton & District Museum, Pemberton Search and Rescue and other groups be requested to submit their 2008 Revenue Report, and Five – Year Financial plans prior to funds disbursement.

2. THAT the Pemberton and District Museum requisition amount as presented in the 2009 Financial Plan be approved.

5. Pemberton Valley Transit Budget (3200) 1. THAT a letter be sent to the Resort Municipality of Whistler setting out details of commuter service costs and request a similar cost sharing for the Pemberton commuter service as exists with the Whistler/Squamish commuter service.

2. THAT options 1 – 3 inclusive (Option 3.1 in Spreadsheet) as put forward by

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 279 of 323 This is page 5 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

BC Transit in their February 12, 2009 letter be approved.

3. THAT the 2009 Pemberton Valley Transit budget be amended accordingly.

6. Pemberton Valley Transit Annual Operating Agreement: November 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009 1. THAT the current 5 month Annual Operating Agreement be approved;

2. THAT the Board Chair and CAO be authorized to execute the Pemberton Valley Transit Annual Operating Agreement.

7. Judith MacKenzie, February 10, 2009 - Recreation Solutions for Pemberton THAT Ms. MacKenzie’s February 10, 2009 and Ms. Chadsey’s February 5, 2009 correspondence be received and responded to.

8. Sea to Sky Community Services Correspondence THAT the February 19, 2009 Sea To Sky Community Services correspondence be received and referred to Staff. CARRIED

3.5 District of Lillooet, and Areas A and B Budget Meeting Recommendations of February 27, 2009:

2009 – 2013 Financial Plan

It was moved and seconded: THAT items 3.5.1 thru 3.5.16 be moved:

1. Lillooet/Area A & B Rescue Service (1703) 1. Approval of Lillooet/Area A & B Rescue Service Budget as presented 2. Request confirmation of how services will be delivered in light of pending lease expiration. 3. Request clarification in areas of response for the service.

2. 911 Interior (1763) 1. Approval of 911 Interior budget as presented 2. Consultation with residents of the Yalakom Valley on this service.

3. Lillooet Area Refuse Grounds (1902)

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 280 of 323 This is page 6 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

1. Approval of Lillooet Area Refuse Grounds budget as presented. 2. Review of alternative means for charging tipping fees at the landfill. 3. Maintaining recycling implementation as the highest priority for this service.

4. Lillooet Camelsfoot TV Rebroadcasting (2003) 1. Approval of Lillooet Camelsfoot TV Rebroadcasting budget as presented. 2. Request clarification of radio service plans for Lillooet and defined area; 3. Withholding of funds until radio service plans have been received.

5. Lillooet District Recreation Centre (2104) THAT the Lillooet District Recreation Centre budget be approved as presented.

6. Lillooet Fire Protection (1706) THAT the Lillooet Fire Protection budget be approved as presented.

7. Bralorne Fire Protection (1707) THAT the Bralorne Fire Protection budget be approved as presented.

8. Seton/Shalalth Fire Protection (1711) THAT the Seton/Shalalth Fire Protection budget be approved as presented.

9. Gold Bridge Street Lighting (1800) THAT the Gold Bridge Street Lighting budget be approved as presented.

10. Bralorne Street Lighting (1801) THAT the Bralorne Street Lighting budget be approved as presented.

11. Seton Street Lighting (1802) THAT the Seton Street Lighting budget be approved as presented.

12. Bridge River TV Rebroadcasting (2000) THAT the Bridge River TV Rebroadcasting Budget be approved as presented.

13. Whitecap Bear Creek Development Dyking/Drainage (2402) THAT the Whitecap Bear Creek Development Dyking/Drainage budget be

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 281 of 323 This is page 7 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

approved as presented.

14. Bralorne TV Rebroadcasting (2002) THAT the Bralorne TV Rebroadcasting budget be approved as presented.

15. Gold Bridge Water System (2706) THAT the Gold Bridge Water System budget be approved as presented.

16. Bralorne Sewer System (2800) THAT the Bralorne Sewer System budget be approved as presented.

CARRIED

3.6 Recommendations Released from In-Camera Status at January 26, 2009 In- Camera Meeting:

It was moved and seconded:

THAT items 3.6.1 thru 3.6.5 be moved:

1. Manager of Administrative Services Position THAT the position of Manager of Administrative Services be changed to Corporate Officer.

2. Chief Elections Officer for Referendums and 2008 Local Election THAT the appointment of Ms. Ludlow be rescinded and that Ms. Allison Macdonald be appointed the Chief Elections Officer for Bylaws 1082 and 1083 Other Voting.

THAT Ms. Allison Macdonald be appointed the Chief Election Officer for the 2008 Local Government Election.

3. Appointment – Director of Finance THAT Ms. Suzanne Lafrance be offered employment as the Director of Finance and appointed the Officer position of “Treasurer”.

4. Appointment – Manager of Administrative Services THAT Ms. Leslie Lloyd be offered employment as the Manager of Administrative Services with the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District;

AND THAT Ms. Leslie Lloyd be appointed to the officer position of “Secretary” effective the date she commences employment with the SLRD.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 282 of 323 This is page 8 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

5. Consideration of Agricultural Land Commission’s Decision on Live Nation’s 2009 Pemberton Music Festival THAT the CAO be authorized to send a letter of undertaking with respect to committing to the development of a Memorandum of Understanding regarding Live Nation’s Pemberton Festival application. CARRIED

4 Bylaws

4.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote

4.1.1 Bylaw 1118 – Devine Water Rates and Regulations By-law No. 632, 1997, Amendment By-law No. 1118, 2009

It was moved and seconded:

1. THAT Bylaw No. 1118 cited as “Devine Water Rates and Regulations By-law No. 632, 1997, Amendment By-law No. 1118, 2009” be introduced, and read a first, second, and third time. CARRIED

It was moved and seconded:

2. THAT Bylaw No. 1118 cited as “Devine Water Rates and Regulations By-law No. 632, 1997, Amendment By-law No. 1118, 2009” be adopted.

CARRIED

4.1.2 Bylaw 1119 - Pemberton North Water Rates Amendment By-law No. 1119, 2009

It was moved and seconded:

1. THAT Bylaw No. 1119, cited as “Pemberton North Water Rates Amendment By- law No. 1119, 2009” be introduced, and read a first, second, and third time.

CARRIED

It was moved and seconded:

2. THAT Bylaw No. 1119, cited as “Pemberton North Water Rates Amendment By- law No. 1119, 2009” be adopted.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 283 of 323 This is page 9 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

CARRIED

4.1.3 Bylaw 1121 - D’Arcy Water System Local Service Parcel Tax By-law

It was moved and seconded:

1. THAT Bylaw 1121 cited as “D’Arcy Water System Local Service Parcel Tax By- law No. 1121 - 2009” be introduced and read a first, second, and third time.

CARRIED

It was moved and seconded:

2. THAT Bylaw 1121 cited as “D’Arcy Water System Local Service Parcel Tax By- law No. 1121 - 2009” be adopted. CARRIED

4.1.4 Bylaw 1125 – Pemberton Public Library Contribution Local Service Amendment Bylaw 1125

It was moved and seconded:

THAT Bylaw No. 1125, cited as “Pemberton Public Library Contribution Local Service Amendment Bylaw 1125 - 2009” be adopted.

CARRIED

4.1.5 Bylaw 1128 – Rezoning at Blackwater Creek (Area C)

Considered earlier in the meeting.

4.2 Weighted Corporate Vote – All Directors

4.2.1 Bylaw No. 1127 – Squamish-Lillooet Regional District 2009 – 2013 Financial Plan Bylaw No. 1127-2009

It was moved and seconded:

1. THAT Bylaw No. 1127, cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District 2009 – 2013 Financial Plan Bylaw No. 1127-2009” be introduced, read a first, second, and third time. CARRIED

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 284 of 323 This is page 10 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

It was moved and seconded:

2. THAT Bylaw No. 1127, cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District 2009 – 2013 Financial Plan Bylaw No. 1127-2009” be adopted.

CARRIED

Ms. Lafrance left the meeting at 10:45 AM.

5 Staff Reports and Other Business

5.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote

5.1.1 Electoral Area D Official Community Plan Review

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the terms of reference for the Electoral Area D Official Community Plan review be endorsed. CARRIED

5.1.2 Section 57 Notice on Title – Mrs. Mary Romanin – Lot 2, Plan 36804, DL 166, LLD – 7752 A Pemberton Meadows Road, Pemberton

It was moved and seconded:

THAT a notice on title be registered against Lot 2, Plan 36804, DL 166, LLD as “the permit was not obtained or the inspection has not been satisfactorily completed” per Community Charter Section 57 (1) (b) (ii).

CARRIED

5.1.3 Section 57 Notice on Title – Mr. Blake Seale – Lot 1, DL 4903, Plan KAP47250, LLD – 9550 Texas Creek Road, Lillooet

It was moved and seconded:

THAT a notice on title be registered against Lot 1, DL4903, Plan KAP47250, LLD as “the permit was not obtained or the inspection has not been satisfactorily completed” per Community Charter Section 57 (1) (b) (ii).

CARRIED

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 285 of 323 This is page 11 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

5.1.4 Section 57 Notice on Title – Mr. Cale Brooke and Ms. Jeanna Sali – Lot A, DL 211, Plan 22732, LLD – 1716 Sea to Sky Hwy. #99, Mt. Currie

It was moved and seconded:

THAT a notice on title be registered against Lot A, DL 211, Plan 22732, LLD as “the permit was not obtained or the inspection has not been satisfactorily completed” per Community Charter Section 57 (1) (b) (ii).

CARRIED

5.1.5 Expired Building Permit – Mr. Claude Chardonnens and Ms. Anna Vostrova - BP#10162 – Lot A, Plan KAP78020, DL 2411, LLD – 7040 Gun Lake Road West, Gun Lake

It was moved and seconded:

THAT a notice on title be registered against Lot A, Plan KAP78020, DL2411, LLD as “the inspection has not been satisfactorily completed” Community Charter Section 57 (1) (b) (ii). CARRIED

5.1.6 Whistler2020 Partnership Agreement & Task Force Action Implementation

It was moved and seconded:

1. THAT the SLRD respectfully decline the invitation to sign the Whistler2020 Partnership Agreement with the Resort Municipality of Whistler/Whistler Sustainability Centre. CARRIED

It was moved and seconded:

2. THAT the SLRD ‘accept and manage’ the three actions outlined below, which have been recommended by the RMOW/Whistler2020 task force action process for implementation by the SLRD:

x Work through the Regional Transit Planning and Capital Infrastructure Service to support regional transportation initiatives (including making park and ride more attractive) in the Sea to Sky Corridor. x Preserve agricultural land for agricultural purposes. x Through the Regional Transit Planning and Capital Infrastructure Service, convene a regional public transportation working group.

CARRIED

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 286 of 323 This is page 12 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

5.1.7 Furry Creek Kayak Club Private Dock

It was moved and seconded:

1. Given the constraints and issues pertaining to the proposed moorage at Furry Creek, that the area not be used for boat moorage and that persons who have placed structures on or attached structures to SLRD property be directed to remove these structures within 60 days. 2. Given the sediment containment area and fisheries habitat constraints of the site, that the SLRD a) not pursue tenure and b) not support tenure applications by others. 3. The Oliver’s Landing Boat and Kayak Club not install a kayak launching platform until after a detailed submission of their proposal has been provided for consideration by the Board and Board (and other agency) approval received. CARRIED

5.1.8 Letter of Support for Britannia Beach Historical Society – Britannia Project

It was moved and seconded:

THAT item 5.1.8 be tabled. CARRIED

It was moved and seconded:

THAT item 5.1.8 be lifted from the table. CARRIED

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the motion be amended by adding “with the advice that the SLRD has not attempted to prioritize the relative merits of this application or any other grant applications of this nature which might be forthcoming from within the Regional District and its member municipalities”.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 287 of 323 This is page 13 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

Vote on Amendment: CARRIED

Motion as amended:

THAT the SLRD provide a letter of support for the Britannia Beach Historical Society’s application for funding under the Canada-British Columbia Building Canada Fund – Communities Component [BCF-CC] for its BC Museum of Mining and Britannia Project with the advice that the SLRD has not attempted to prioritize the relative merits of this application or any other grant applications of this nature which might be forthcoming from within the Regional District and its member municipalities.

CARRIED

5.1.9 Data Sharing Agreement with Lil’wat Nation

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the Board approve in principle the Confidentiality and Non-reproduction Agreement between the Lil’wat Nation Land and Resource Department and the SLRD with the inclusion of:

1. words “pertaining to Lil’wat archaeological and traditional use data” 2. cancellation of agreement clause

AND THAT the Data Sharing Agreement with Lil’wat Nation be referred to SLRD solicitors. CARRIED

5.1.10 Temporary Use Permit #16 – Canadian Snowmobile (Callaghan Valley)

It was moved and seconded:

THAT notice be given, as per section 921 of the Local Government Act, that the Regional Board intends to give consideration to issuing Temporary Use Permit No. 16 at the April 27, 2009 Board meeting. CARRIED

5.1.11 UBCM/Area Association Resolution Submission - Expanded Use of Section 941 Funds Provided in Lieu of Park Lands Resolution

It was moved and seconded:

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 288 of 323 This is page 14 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

THAT the following resolution be submitted to UBCM and Area Associations for consideration at the 2009 UBCM convention:

WHEREAS funds paid by an owner, pursuant to Section 941 of the Local Government Act in lieu of providing park land at time of subdivision are often insufficient to enable acquisition of suitable parklands, and

WHEREAS communities might receive a greater and more immediate benefit from utilization of these funds to improve existing parks,

THEREFORE be it resolved that: the Province of BC be requested to amend Section 941 of the Local Government Act to provide that funds received under Section 941 may be used for acquisition and improvement of parklands.

CARRIED

5.1.12 UBCM/Area Association Resolution Submission - BC Hydro Resolution

It was moved and seconded:

THAT item 5.1.12 be tabled until after lunch.

CARRIED

It was moved and seconded:

THAT item 5.1.12 be lifted from the table.

CARRIED

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the following resolution be submitted to UBCM and Area Associations for consideration at the 2009 UBCM convention:

CONSUMER PROTECTION FROM POWER OUTAGES Squamish- Lillooet RD

WHEREAS BC Hydro, directly or by utilities through which it provides service, is the sole supplier of power to British Columbia consumers and is exempt from virtually all liability under sections 9.7 and 9.8 of the Electric Tariff;

AND WHEREAS BC Hydro investigates itself and is generally the sole arbiter of damages incurred by consumers during incidents of power disruption and

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 289 of 323 This is page 15 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

restoration;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the BC Utilities Commission, or an independent review panel, be empowered to investigate, arbitrate and award financial compensation to consumers suffering loss, injury, damage, or expense as a result of incidents of power disruption and restoration.

CARRIED

Recess and Reconvene

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the meeting be recessed and reconvene at 12:30 PM.

CARRIED

The meeting was recessed at 11:50 AM and reconvened at 12:37 PM.

Mr. DeJong joined the meeting at 12:37 PM. Mr. DeJong left the meeting at 12:56 PM.

5.1.13 Regional Growth Strategy Status Report

5.1.14 Letter from Village of Pemberton – Village of Pemberton Review of the Proposed Private School at Ravenscrest

It was moved and seconded:

THAT for the purpose of transparency and completeness of communications, that all SLRD reports and supporting materials on this matter be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission to accompany the Village of Pemberton submission on this land use matter.

Opposed: Directors Gardner and Sturdy CARRIED

6 Correspondence Requesting Action

6.1 Pemberton Chamber of Commerce – Appointment to Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission

It was moved and seconded:

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 290 of 323 This is page 16 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

THAT Paul Vacirca be appointed to the Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission, replacing Paul Selina.

CARRIED

6.2 St’át’imc Grad Committee – Contribution Request

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the St’at’imc Grad Committee contribution request be referred to the Electoral Area Directors Committee. CARRIED

6.3 In-SHUCK-ch Nation – Request to Minister Strahl

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the SLRD provide a Letter of Support for the In-SHUCK-ch Nation’s request that Minister Strahl visit and meet with the In-SHUCH-ch Nation in their communities. CARRIED

6.4 In-SHUCK-ch Days - Request for $1000 Contribution

It was moved and seconded:

THAT $250 from each Electoral Area Select Funds be authorized for the In- SHUCK-ch Nation’s In-SHUCK-ch Days. CARRIED

6.5 In-SHUCK-ch Nation Request for Letter of Support for “Catch-up” Programme

It was moved and seconded:

THAT a letter of support be sent to the In-SHUCK-ch Nation for their “Catch-up” programme. CARRIED

6.6 Lil’wat Nation – Regional Growth Strategy

It was moved and seconded:

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 291 of 323 This is page 17 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

THAT the Province of BC and the Government of Canada be invited to work with the SLRD and the Lil’wat Nation to seek a means to address Lil’wat Nation concerns.

AND THAT a report be included outlining efforts made to date with respect to First Nation involvement in the Regional Growth Strategy.

CARRIED

7 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes

7.1 Regular Board Meeting Minutes – February 23, 2009

It was moved and seconded:

THAT items 7.1 to 7.3 be approved as circulated.

CARRIED

7.2 Special Board Meeting Minutes – March 9, 2009

7.3 Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes – March 9, 2009

7.4 Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Minutes – March 9, 2009

It was moved and seconded:

THAT items 7.4 to 7.10 be received. CARRIED

7.5 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes – March 9, 2009

7.6 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes – March 4, 2009

7.7 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes – February 24, 2009

7.8 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes – March 2, 2009

7.9 Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes – February 25, 2009

7.10 Lillooet /Areas A & B Budget Meeting Minutes – February 27, 2009

8 Business Arising from the Minutes

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 292 of 323 This is page 18 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

9 Consent Items – Correspondence for Information

10 Delegations and Petitions

10.1 Pemberton and Area Recreation Task Force - Liz Scroggins

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the Pemberton and Area Recreation Task Force item be referred to the Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee.

CARRIED

11 Decision on Late Business

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the late items be considered at this meeting.

CARRIED

12 Late Business

12.1 2010 Olympic Venues Tour

13 Directors’ Reports

14 Board In-Camera Meeting

14.1 Resolution to move In-Camera

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the Board move In-Camera under the authority of Section 90 (1) (c) (g) of the Community Charter, to exclude the public with the exception of Board; Staff; and Mr. Bordian. CARRIED

The Regular Board meeting recessed at 2:15 PM and resumed at 3:20 PM following the In-Camera Board meeting.

15 Termination

The Chair adjourned the meeting at 3:20 PM.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 293 of 323 This is page 19 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 23, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

Russ Oakley Leslie E. Lloyd Chair Secretary

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 294 of 323 SLRD Special Meeting Minutes April 14, 2009; 12:30 PM, or immediately following the EAD Committee Meeting SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC

In Attendance:

Board: Russ Oakley, (Area A); Susie Gimse (Area C); Jordan Sturdy (Pemberton); Mickey Macri (Area B); John Turner (Area D)

Staff: Leslie Lloyd, Director of Administrative Services (Recording Secretary); Tracey Tracy Napier, Planning Technician

Others: 4 members of the Public

1 Call to Order

The meeting was called to order at 12:43 PM

2 Approval of Agenda

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the agenda be approved as presented.

CARRIED

3 New Business

3.1 Non-Farm Use in the ALR Squamish Valley, Area D - Bass Coast Festival

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the application for a non-farm use in the ALR, submitted by Bass Coast Projects Ltd., for the lands legally described as DL 994, NWD be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission with a recommendation of support, with the same conditions, as appropriate, as for the Pemberton Music Festival submission to the Agricultural Land Commission.

CARRIED

4 Termination

It was moved and seconded:

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 295 of 323 This is page 2 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Special meeting, held on April 14, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

THAT the meeting be adjourned. CARRIED The meeting was adjourned at 1:01 PM.

Russ Oakley Leslie E. Lloyd Chair Secretary

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 296 of 323 Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday April 14, 2009; 10:30 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster St., Pemberton BC

In Attendance:

Committee: Russ Oakley(Area A); Mickey Macri(Area B); John Turner(Area D).

Staff: Leslie Lloyd, Director of Administrative Services (Recording Secretary); Tracy Napier, Planning Technician; Peter DeJong, Policy Analyst.

Others: 1 public

1 Call to Order

The meeting was called to order at 10:32 AM.

2 Approval of Agenda

The following items were added to the agenda

7.1 Bylaw Enforcement 7.2 Bridge River Valley Economic Development

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the agenda be approved as amended. CARRIED

3 New Business

3.1 St’at’imc Grad Committee – Contribution Request

It was moved and seconded:

THAT $500.00 from Area B Select Funds be contributed to the annual event for the graduating students of the St’at’imc Nation.

CARRIED

3.2 Development Variance Permit #74 Bralorne, Area A - Cizinsky

It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 297 of 323 This is page 2 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, held on April 14, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

THAT a Development Variance Permit for Lot 11, DL 2372, LLD, Plan 5847, to allow a relaxation to the side yard setback from 4.5m to 1.2m be approved, and that the issuance of the permit be authorized.

CARRIED

3.3 Emergency Planning Tabletop Exercise for the Fountain Valley - Tom Grantham and PEP

It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT staff seek funding opportunities to conduct a tabletop exercise for the Fountain Valley for emergency purposes. CARRIED

3.4 Fuel Mitigation Programme for the Yalakom Valley - Bill Spencer and Geoff Pfeifer

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the correspondence regarding fuel mitigation programme for the Yalakom Valley be received. CARRIED

3.5 Upper Cheakamus Road

It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT staff gather information and recommend solutions regarding ownership, maintenance and repair of the Upper Cheakamus Road.

CARRIED

3.6 March Monthly Building Report

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the March monthly building report be received for information.

CARRIED

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 298 of 323 This is page 3 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, held on April 14, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

3.7 Bylaw 1130 - Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Emergency Program and Disaster Operations By-law No. 1130-2009

It was moved and seconded:

THAT item 3.7 be deferred until the end of the meeting.

CARRIED

4 Correspondence Requesting Action

4.1 Pemberton & District Chamber of Commerce Visitor Information Centre – Request for Funding

It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT a $2500 contribution be made to the Pemberton and District Chamber of Commerce Visitor Information Centre.

CARRIED

4.2 Carol Bethune – Request for Assistance

It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT Staff respond to Carol Bethune’s letter to thank her for the suggestions and inform her that there are costs involved for such programmes. CARRIED

4.3 Sue Senger - Bear Smart Funding Request

It was moved and seconded:

THAT $5000 from Area A Select Funds and $5000 from Area B Select Funds be contributed to Landscope Consulting Corporation for the Bear Smart Program.

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District meet with the District of

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 299 of 323 This is page 4 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, held on April 14, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

Lillooet to discuss the potential of long term funding contributions for the Bear Aware Program. CARRIED

4.4 Lillooet Secondary School – Request for Grad Funding

It was moved and seconded:

THAT $500 from Area B Select Funds be contributed to the Lillooet Secondary School 2009 Graduation celebration.

CARRIED

5 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes

5.1 March 9, 2009 Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Minutes

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the March 9, 2009 Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Minutes be approved as circulated. CARRIED

6 Business Arising from the Minutes

7 Late items

7.1 Bylaw Enforcement

Director Turner provided information for staff regarding possible bylaw enforcement action items in Britannia Beach area.

7.2 Bridge River Valley Economic Development

It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District request the Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society provide their 2009 proposed budget and future plans to avoid similar requests for advance funding in the future.

THAT the Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society be requested to provide information pertaining to the alleged missing files as reported to the RCMP.

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 300 of 323 This is page 5 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, held on April 14, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

CARRIED

3.7 Bylaw 1130 - Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Emergency Program and Deferred Disaster Operations By-law No. 1130-2009 Item It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT By-law No. 1130, cited as the “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Emergency Program and Disaster Operations By-law No. 1130-2009” be introduced and read a first, second, and third time.

CARRIED

7.3 Mobile and Portable Radio Purchases for Bralorne and Seton Portage Volunteer Fire Departments.

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the purchase of mobile and portable radios for the Seton Portage Volunteer Fire Department be made from Area B Select Funds

CARRIED

8 Termination

The meeting was adjourned at 12:06 PM.

Russ Oakley Leslie Lloyd Chair Director of Administrative Services

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 301 of 323 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes April 14, 2009; 2:00 PM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC

In Attendance:

Committee: Susie Gimse, (Area C); Ted Craddock, (Pemberton); Jordan Sturdy, (Pemberton);

Staff: Paul Edgington, (CAO); Leslie Lloyd, Director of Admin.Services (Recording Secretary)

Others: L. Ames, (Village of Pemberton Councilor); J. McKenzie, L. May, P. Read; S. Ellis; (Pemberton Recreation Advisory Committee) and L. Scroggins (Pemberton Recreation Task Force).

1 Call to Order

The meeting was called to order at 2:03 PM

2 Approval of Agenda

It was moved and seconded:

THAT an in-camera session be held immediately following the regular meeting. THAT the agenda be approved as amended. CARRIED

3 New Business

3.1 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee – new members

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee be requested to provide advice and recommendations on:

A) Water Park for the Community B) Children’s Summer Programming C) Recreational Programmes in General CARRIED

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 302 of 323 This is page 2 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee meeting, held on April 14, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

3.2 Pemberton Recreation Task Force - referred from March 2009 SLRD Board meeting & March 2009 Village of Pemberton Council meeting (delegation to follow at end of meeting – item #7.1)

4 Correspondence for Action

4.1 Pemberton Seniors Society – Request for Funding

It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT $3000 be contributed to the Pemberton Valley Senior’s Society for the Seniors Fitness Program. CARRIED

4.2 Pemberton Chamber of Commerce – Barn Dance

It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT a conditional letter of support be provided to the Pemberton and District Chamber of Commerce for the Annual Barn Dance, subject to the Chamber of Commerce conducting neighbourhood consultation and meeting all requirements of the Special Events Permit.

CARRIED

4.3 Pemberton Chamber of Commerce – Request for Funding for Visitors’ Centre

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the Pemberton and District Chamber of Commerce correspondence regarding the Visitor Centre be received. CARRIED

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 303 of 323 This is page 3 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee meeting, held on April 14, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

4.4 Anne West - Bleachers at Signal Hill Ball Field

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the correspondence from Anne West regarding bleachers at Signal Hill Ball Field be received. CARRIED

4.5 Pemberton Youth Soccer Association – Request for Funding

It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT the Pemberton Youth Soccer Association be requested to submit their 2009 request for funding assistance, including their 2008/2009 budget

CARRIED

4.6 Pemberton Arts Council – Request for Funding

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the October 28, 2008 Pemberton Arts Council correspondence be received.

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT a letter be sent to the Pemberton Arts Council in support of their Grant application of Arts Partners in Creative Development funding.

CARRIED

4.7 Quad Riders ATV Association of BC – Request for Assistance

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 304 of 323 This is page 4 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee meeting, held on April 14, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC. It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT the October 29, 2008 Quad Riders ATV Association of B.C. correspondence be referred to the Pemberton Valley ATV Club, requesting they provide direction to the Quad Riders ATV Association Of B.C. CARRIED

5 Minutes

5.1 March 9, 2009 Pemberton Valley Utilities and Community Services Meeting Minutes It was moved and seconded:

THAT the March 9, 2009 Pemberton Valley Utilities and Community Services Meeting Minutes be approved as circulated.

CARRIED

5.2 March 4, 2009 Pemberton Valley Utilities and Community Services Meeting Minutes It was moved and seconded:

THAT the March 4, 2009 Pemberton Valley Utilities and Community Services Meeting Minutes be approved as circulated.

CARRIED

6 Delegation

6.1 Pemberton Recreation Task Force – Liz Scroggins

7 Meeting Closed to the Public

It was moved and seconded:

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 305 of 323 This is page 5 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee meeting, held on April 14, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC. THAT pursuant to Section 90 (1) (a) (c) (e) of the Community Charter, this meeting of the Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee be closed to the public. CARRIED

The meeting was closed to the public at 4:09 PM

8 Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 4:41 PM

Susan Gimse Presiding Chair

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 306 of 323 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes Monday April 6, 2009; 9:00 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC

In Attendance:

Commission: A. Helmer (Chair); S. Sturdy; P. Vacirca; S. Ryan; S. Gimse; T. Craddock; J. Kelly

Staff: L. Lloyd, Director of Administrative Services; S. Cheng, Administrative Assistant (Recording Secretary)

Others: L. Ames and A. LeBlanc (Pemberton Councilors); R. McClean (Custom Fit Communications); A. Ross (Consultant)

1 Appointment of Interim Chair

It was moved and seconded:

THAT Anna Helmer be appointed as Interim Chair.

CARRIED Ms. Helmer assumed the Chair of the meeting.

2 Call To Order

The meeting was called to order at 9:02 AM.

3 Approval of Agenda

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the Agenda be approved as circulated. CARRIED

3 New Business

3.1 Pemberton Music Festival

It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT Staff prepare a brief on policing costs and other issues of the 2008

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 307 of 323 This is page 2 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Area C/Pemberton 2010 Economic Development Commission held on April 6, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

Pemberton Festival as soon as possible. CARRIED

3.2 Delegation: Roy McClean – Update on Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Website

Mr. McClean gave an overview of the Pemberton Economic Development Commission website (edcpemberton.com).

4 March 2, 2009 Pemberton /Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes

It was moved and seconded:

THAT the March 2, 2009 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission meeting minutes be approved as circulated.

CARRIED

5 Economic Development Consultant’s March Monthly Report

Mr. S. Ryan left the meeting at 10:14 AM.

It was moved and seconded:

THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:

THAT Directors Gimse and Sturdy discuss with the Regional Board the Economic Development Commission agenda distribution procedures.

CARRIED

6 Meeting Closed to the Public

It was moved and seconded:

THAT pursuant to Section 90 of the Community Charter, that this meeting of the Area C/Pemberton 2010 Economic Development Commission be closed to the public other than commission members and Staff as the matter to be considered relate to personnel matters affecting the Regional District.

CARRIED

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 308 of 323 This is page 3 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Area C/Pemberton 2010 Economic Development Commission held on April 6, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.

The meeting was closed to the public at 10:45 PM.

7 Termination

The meeting was adjourned at 11:42 AM.

Anna Helmer Interim Chair

SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 309 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 310 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 311 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 312 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 313 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 314 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 315 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 316 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 317 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 318 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 319 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 320 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 321 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 322 of 323 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 27, 2009 Page 323 of 323