PLANTS AND ENVIRONMENT Clarifying the pest status of some exotic species for New Zealand Exotic of pest significance pose a a great deal of attention given to termites The national pest status of the termite risk to New Zealand’s biosecurity and our as a taxonomic group generally in species from the time when all cases nation’s trade if they become established. New Zealand, perhaps owing to our very have been eradicated can be considered New Zealand has experience of exotic small native fauna. There has also been as “absent: eradicated” (IPPC 2017b). termites arriving here via imported little discussion of exotic species in the With this in mind, we can review the commodities and other pathways. New Zealand context. What publications known detections of C. acinaciformis, Fortunately the vast majority of these do exist have been rather sporadic, C. frenchi and C. brevis in New Zealand arrivals have either been dealt with at our resulting in long periods of time during and consider the eradication measures borders or, if found within our borders, which the status of some exotic species undertaken and outcomes achieved to they have been contained, treated may not have been clear. Further, there date for these species. and eradicated. has been a lack of published information regarding any detections of exotic acinaciformis Only three exotic termite species are termites and actions undertaken by considered to have become established and Coptotermes frenchi agencies that hold this information in New Zealand – Kalotermes Bain & Jenkin (1983) reviewed a range of (i.e., MPI and its predecessors). On top banksiae and Glyptotermes brevicornis exotic termite species for New Zealand, of all this, confusion arises from the (Kalotermitidae), and Porotermes including C. acinaciformis and C. frenchi. use of different terms, definitions, or adamsoni (Stolotermitidae), evidenced The terms they saw as best applying interpretations of terms, by different by repeated collections over time to records of exotic termite species authors and agencies. from local-origin host material. While were “established”, “recorded from” none of these established species The field of invasion biology has created and “intercepted”. They considered are considered of great economic many terms to describe the status of an both C. acinaciformis and C. frenchi significance, other exotic termite species organism in a particular geographic area, to be “established”, which they defined found within New Zealand’s borders both fundamentally (i.e., is it present as meaning that there was “evidence certainly are significant pests. Of these, or absent) as well as the nature of any of these species spreading from host the most important are the Australian presence. MPI developed operational material in which they were not subterranean termites Coptotermes protocols for responding to detections imported”. The designation “established” acinaciformis and Coptotermes frenchi of Coptotermes, which have used the was based on known activity of the two (), and the West Indian term “eliminated” to designate the stage species in New Zealand at the time: drywood termite Cryptotermes brevis of operational activities when all known C. acinaciformis was still active at one (Kalotermitidae). Owing to the economic activity of the termite at a location had site in Te Puke and another in Auckland, significance of these three species, ceased, and this was evidenced by a and C. frenchi was still active at one site whenever they have been found in series of consecutive inspections that in Hamilton and another in Auckland. It New Zealand the response objective has found no activity. Previously MPI only is important to note that these locations been total eradication. used the term “eradicated” at the end were under treatment at the time, and of a subsequent period of continued that Bain & Jenkin (1983) also reported Here we provide a summary of the surveillance at the location, in most cases other locations of historical activity detections of these species, present up- up to 5 years after all termite activity for both species where they had been to-date information on the eradication actually ceased. successfully eradicated. measures that have been undertaken in response to them, and propose The International Plant Protection In the more than 20 years since, that the status of all three species for Convention (IPPC) International further detections were made of both New Zealand can be considered “absent: Standards for Phytosanitary Measures C. acinaciformis and C. frenchi in eradicated”. (IPPC 2017a,b) define specific terms New Zealand (MPI, unpublished data). and pest status categories. The IPPC All detections, both prior and subsequent The need for clarification does not use the term “eliminated”, but to Bain & Jenkin (1983), have been It is crucial to be clear about which IPPC (2017a) does define “eradication” treated by relevant government agencies, species are established and which as “application of phytosanitary and official programmes continued are not. There has been some measures to eliminate a pest from an through the 1980s and 1990s to eradicate confusion regarding the presence or area [formerly eradicate]”. Thus it is them. Eventually in 2005 both species absence in New Zealand of the three clear that “eradication” and “eradicated” were officially declared to be “eradicated” exotic termite species Coptotermes mean the same thing as “eliminate” and following a period of surveillance after acinaciformis and Coptotermes frenchi “eliminated”. Therefore we propose to activity had actually ceased (Ross, (Rhinotermitidae), and Cryptotermes use the term “eradicated” rather than 2005a,b). It is important to revisit our brevis (Kalotermitidae). This stems from “eliminated” wherever the activity of an earlier comments about the terms used a number of factors. There has not been exotic termite is deemed to have ceased. at the time by MPI’s predecessor, the

30 Surveillance 45 (2) 2018 Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry C. frenchi had “possibly been eliminated live C. brevis. The official eradication (MAF), which used the term “eliminated” from New Zealand” because the species programme involved removal of wooden rather than “eradicated” when all had been under active management items from the house for fumigation, Coptotermes activity actually ceased in at the time of Bain & Jenkin (1983), and an entire house-fumigation using 2001 (Ross, 2005a). We proposed that and had not been mentioned from sulphuryl fluoride, in October 2011. it was at this point that eradication, as New Zealand sources since. Indeed, MPI is still conducting extended post- per the IPPC (2017a) definition, was no new detections have been made of eradication surveillance for C. brevis, actually achieved. Following this, MAF C. frenchi in New Zealand since 1998 similar to the eradication protocols ran a surveillance programme until (MPI, unpublished data). for Coptotermes but in this case for 2005, during which no further termite 10 years. MPI therefore expects to end Despite the successful eradication again activity was found. response activities for C. brevis by 2021. of C. acinaciformis from known sites in To date there has been no activity of After the widespread efforts up to 2001 to New Zealand by April 2008, still more C. brevis found since 2011. We therefore eradicate Coptotermes from New Zealand, detections of this species have been made conclude that this species should also two new detections of C. acinaciformis in subsequent years. The location, date of be considered “absent: eradicated” were made in January 2006 at Richmond detection, date of eradication, and actual from New Zealand. (near Nelson), and in January 2007 at or proposed end of surveillance for these Coatesville (near Auckland) (Ross, 2006; recent responses to C. acinaciformis are Summary Pearson & Bennett 2008; Philip et al., shown in Table 1. At the time of their It is clear that Coptotermes acinaciformis, 2008). As before, official eradication detection all these could be considered Coptotermes frenchi and Cryptotermes programmes were implemented for as fitting with the IPPC definition of brevis have been found in New Zealand both locations. Eradication (as per IPPC “establishment”: “perpetuation, for in the past, and that many of these finds definition) was quickly achieved at the foreseeable future, of a pest within could have been justifiably considered both locations, with all activity having an area after entry” (IPPC, 2017a). as an “establishment” (as defined by ceased at Richmond by June 2007 and However, at present they are all at a stage IPPC) at the locations where they were Coatesville by April 2008 (Pearson & where they should be considered to be found. However, MPI has implemented Bennett, 2008). MacFarlane et al. (2010) eradicated (as per IPPC definition). Five measures to eradicate all detections of included both Coptotermes species in locations are still under post-eradication these species and there is no evidence their contribution to the New Zealand surveillance. of any activity by any of them in Inventory of Biodiversity as “adventive New Zealand at present. Also, these (naturalised alien)”. The inclusion of Cryptotermes brevis species have never been found without a C. acinaciformis can be understood, Cryptotermes brevis (Kalotermitidae) is direct association or link with imported considering that MAF continued to not included in any of the publications timbers. For example, all incursions use the term “eliminated” rather than about termites in New Zealand of C. acinaciformis since 1999 have “eradicated” at the time (e.g., Pearson & mentioned so far. Alate termites were been directly associated with imported Bennett, 2008). Similarly, Evans (2011) noted by residents of a house in February Australian hardwood. Therefore we reviewed invasive termites of the world, 2011, and they reported this to MAF propose that all three species can be and he too designated C. acinaciformis who identified them as C. brevis. The first considered “absent: eradicated” from as “established” in New Zealand, citing public report of this termite was by Bain New Zealand. Bain & Jenkin (1983), Philip et al., (2008) (2011), who summarised the detection and Ross (2005a,b). and the actions being undertaken by To comply with operational protocols MAF, and Bennett (2012) provided more that MPI has adopted for these pests, It is unclear why MacFarlane et al. details. A thorough inspection of the MPI will continue post-eradication (2010) included C. frenchi in their list. house found multiple imported wooden surveillance at some of these locations for Unfortunately their information has items with signs of drywood termite. a number of years. However, this should in turn been repeated in several online Several items were destructively sampled not be taken to suggest these pests are resources (Anon., n.d., a, b). In contrast, and were confirmed as infested with not yet eradicated, but to show that MPI Evans (2011) correctly postulated that Table 1: Responses to Coptotermes acinaciformis detected in New Zealand since 2001 (source: MPI, unpublished data). Locations numbered 1 to 9 are also shown in Figure 1. Location Date detected Date eradicated End of post-eradication surveillance 1 Richmond (Nelson) Jan 2006 Jun 2007 Jul 2011 2 Coatesville (Auckland) Jan 2007 Apr 2008 Mar 2013 3 Nelson Nov 2009 Mar 2011 Aug 2016 4 Pukekohe/Patumahoe (Auckland) Nov 2010 Dec 2011 Dec 2016 5 Point Wells (Auckland) Jan 2012 Nov 2013 Pending – set for Nov 2018 6 Drury (Auckland) Nov 2012 Nov 2013 Pending – set for Nov 2018 7 Mangere (Auckland) Sep 2013 Dec 2014 Pending – set for Dec 2019 8 Walton (Waikato) Sep 2013 Dec 2014 Pending – set for Dec 2019 9 Omaha (Auckland) Sep 2014 Nov 2015 Pending – set for Nov 2020

Surveillance 45 (2) 2018 31 (Isoptera) in New Zealand. New Zealand Entomologist 7(4): 365–370. Bennett S (2012). Detection of West Indian drywood termite, Cryptotermes brevis, on Kapiti Coast. Surveillance 39(1): 30–31. Evans TA (2011). Invasive Termites. In: Bignall DE, Roisin Y, Lo N (eds). Biology of Termites: a modern synthesis. Springer, 519–562. IPPC (International Plant Protection Convention) (2017a). International Standard for Phytosanitary measures (ISPM) 5 – Glossary of phytosanitary terms. IPPC (International Plant Protection Convention) (2017b). International Standard for Phytosanitary measures (ISPM) 8 – Determination of pest status in an area. Pearson HG, Bennett SJ (2008). Australina subterranean termites (Coptotermes acinaciformis) in New Zealand. In: Froud KJ, Popay AI, Zydenbos SM (eds.). Surveillance for Biosecurity: pre-border to pest management. NZ Plant Protection Society, Auckland, 167–174. Philip B, Pearson H, Bennett S (2008). Australian termites in New Zealand. Biosecurity Magazine 82: 12–13. Macfarlane RP, Maddison PA, Andrew IG, Berry JA, Johns PM, Hoare RJB, Larivière M-C, Greenslade P, Henderson RC, Smithers CN, Palma RL, Ward JB, Pilgrim RLC, Towns DR, McLellan ID, Teulon DAJ, Hitchings TR, Eastop VF, Martin NA, Fletcher MJ, Stufkens MAW, Dale PJ, Burckhardt D, Buckley TR, Trewick SA (2010). Phylum Arthropoda subphylum Hexapoda: Protura, springtails, Diplura, and . In: Gordon DP (ed.) New Zealand inventory of biodiversity Vol. 2. Christchurch, Canterbury University Press, 233–467.

Figure 1: Locations of responses to Coptotermes acinaciformis detected Ross M (2005a). Australian subterranean in New Zealand since 2001. See Table 1 for details of each location. termites eradicated. Biosecurity Magazine 60, 9. Ross M (2005b). Responding to incursions of Australian subterranean termites in New Zealand. is continuing to take a precautionary In: Lee, C.-Y., Robinson, W.H. (eds). Proceedings Alan Flynn th approach. Notably, there have been five of the 5 International conference on urban Team Manager pests. Perniagaan Ph’ng @ P&Y Design, Peneng, successful eradication programmes Entomology 233–238. for C. acinaciformis at different sites in Plant Health and Environment Ross M (2006). Subterranean termites found in New Zealand since 1999, none of which Laboratory Nelson. Biosecurity Magazine 67, 9. has subsequently seen a renewal of Diagnostic & Surveillance Services activity. With all responses since 2005 Ministry for Primary Industries following similar protocols, we have very [email protected] high confidence in each eradication, and so New Zealand should be considered free from Coptotermes and Cryptotermes References brevis as defined by ISPM (IPPC, 2017a). Anon. (n.d., a). Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa – New Zealand Land Invertebrates. https:// nzinverts.landcareresearch.co.nz/default.aspx. Shaun J Bennett Accessed 21 May 2018. Scientist – Entomology Plant Health and Environment Anon. (n.d., b). New Zealand Organism Register Laboratory (NZOR). http://www.nzor.org.nz/. Accessed 21 Diagnostic & Surveillance Services May 2018. Ministry for Primary Industries Bain J, Jenkin MJ (1983). Kalotermes banksiae, [email protected] Glyptotermes brevicornis, and other termites

32 Surveillance 45 (2) 2018