DOCSLIB.ORG

Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea Post-Hague Ruling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea Post-Hague Ruling Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea Post-Hague Ruling Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea Post-Hague Ruling James Borton Copyright © 2017 by James Borton. Library of Congress Control Number: 2017901835 ISBN: Hardcover 978-1-5245-8241-8 Softcover 978-1-5245-8240-1 eBook 978-1-5245-8481-8 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Thinkstock are models, and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only. Certain stock imagery © Thinkstock. Print information available on the last page. Rev. date: 04/17/2017 To order additional copies of this book, contact: Xlibris 1-888-795-4274 www.Xlibris.com [email protected] 754869 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1: Legal status of islands, rocks in international law The Award of 12 July 2016 and Its Impact on the Clarification of Article 121 (3) LOSC Erik Franckx ...............................................................................1 The Juridical Island: From the Island of Palmas to the South China Sea Alyosius Llamzon ....................................................................19 Philippines vs China: Islands after the Arbitration Jay L. Batongbacal and Bertrand Theodor L. Santos .....................................................31 Legal Status of Islands, Rocks in International Law and Countries’ Practice in the South China Sea Nguyen Quy Binh .....................................................................36 Part 2: Sovereignty dispute over the Paracel and Spratly Islands Sovereignty Assertion in the South China Sea: Militarization and the Construction of Artificial Islands Carlyle A. Thayer ......................................................................55 Land Reclamation and Militarization in the Paracel and the Spratly Islands Go Ito ........................................................................................83 Developments related to Chinese Assertiveness in SCS Shekhar Dutt .............................................................................88 A Study on the China’s “Nine-Dash” Line: The Award of PCA (July 12, 2016) Jeong Gab Yong .........................................................................99 The South China Sea Conflict: Impact of the Paracel Oil Rig Incident and the PCA Award relevant to Three Warfares Koichi Sato ..............................................................................106 Part 3: The Arbitration Award on the case between the Philippines and China The Permanent Court of Arbitration’s Award on the South China Sea Dispute between the Philippines and China: Views from America Nguyen Manh Hung ...............................................................116 India’s Approach to Strategic and Legal Implications of PCA’s Award (abridged) Vinod Anand ...........................................................................129 The Award on the marine environment of the South China Sea in the Philippines vs. China arbitration case Nguyen Chu Hoi .....................................................................135 Giant Clams in Despair: The Urgent Need for Environmentally Conscious Cooperation in the South China Sea and Implications for ASEAN and Concerned Countries Around the Globe Dai Trang Nguyen ..................................................................144 New challenges and new reality in the conflict in the South China Sea Dimitry Mosyakov ..................................................................154 The Award by the Permanent Court of Arbitration: Challenge or Chance for China? Gerhard Will ...........................................................................158 ASEAN’s strategies after the PCA Decision Kavi Chongkittavorn ...............................................................165 Legal bases for moving forward Ngo Vinh Long .......................................................................170 Building a New Security Architecture in the South China Sea and Beyond Harry Krejsa ............................................................................175 The Impacts of PCA Ruling on Regional Strategic Environment in the South China Sea Siswo Pramono ....................................................................181 The Strategic Importance of Strengthening Vietnamese- U.S. Cooperation: Critical Timing, Prospects And Challenges Anders Corr ............................................................................192 Vietnam’s Possible Action Plan on the Land Features in South China Sea (Biên Ðông Sea) After the Arbitral Award in the Philippines v. China Case Ta Van Tai .............................................................................. 206 Map Source: Prepared by Clive Schofield and Andi Arsana of the Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security (ANCORS), University of Wollongong, Australia. The map appeared in the January 2013 issue of the American Journal of International Law, Vol.107 (January 2013): 95, ©2013 American Society of International Law. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS T his collection of timely and valuable papers would not have been possible if it were not for the generous support and direction from Dr. Trang Si Trung at Nha Trang University, and Dr. Pham Dang Phuoc of Pham Van Dong University in Vietnam. This project becomes another valuable installment in an examination of the international law of the sea, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and the recent arbitration ruling made in The Hague, Netherlands. Academics, delegates and other scholars gathered at an international workshop held in Nha Trang, Vietnam on the “Legal Status of Islands and Rocks under International Law and Practice in the South China Sea” on August 16-18, 2016. There they reaffirmed the principle of resolving international disputes by peaceful means on the basis of international law, including the 1982 UNCLOS. This book is also dedicated to the thousands of fishermen who daily cast their lines in the South China Sea. They remain caught up in the ocean’s political fray and remain on the dangerous frontlines of one of Asia’s ongoing maritime boundary disputes. xi PREFACE Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea: Post Hague Ruling James Borton Ocean governance remains a critical issue in the contested South China Sea, due to continued territorial disputes, fishing exploitation, and ASEAN’s power shift alignment towards China. The Hague’s unanimous ruling in 2016 made it clear that under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, China had no legal basis to claim historic rights over most of the contested waterway. In the favorable sweeping ruling for the Philippines, the decision stated that China had breached several UNCLOS articles, governing safety, the marine environment, and navigation at sea. UNCLOS was adopted in 1982 and by June 2011, 162 nations had accepted it. The convention succeeded in defining such terms as “territorial sea,” “exclusive economic zone” (EEZ), and “continental shelf.” It also plainly set the rules on the utilization, exploitation, and conservation of maritime resources. The law of the Sea Convention remains the most important international agreement on ocean policy, since it codifies accepted international law and spells out generally accepted rules of law of the sea, including the right of free passage, demarcation of the territorial sea, and freedom of the high seas. The five-judge tribunal condemned China’s behavior in its aggressive attempts to establish sovereignty by dumping tons of dirt and crushed coral to transform small reefs and rocks into artificial islands complete with airstrips and other military structures. Beijing has already established at least seven such bases, all of them equipped with access channels, helipads, xiii James Borton radar facilities, gun and missile emplacements, piers, and other objects of strategic importance. To all claimant nations and the world as a whole these actions are disturbing. However, the Philippines and other nations appear to be reluctant to challenge China, or even address the significance of The Hague’s ruling. The Law of the Sea treaty sets rules for establishing zones of control over oceans based on distances to coastlines. In addition to China and the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Brunei, Indonesia and Taiwan all make territorial claims in the South China Sea. However, the tribunal’s mandate is to address only maritime disputes, not the underlying land claims to the islands, reefs and rocks. With no authority to enforce its ruling, and China, which has denounced the verdict and boycotted the legal process, the result is a test of international law. Over the past several months, China’s continued policy of “might makes right”, reflected in the number of coast guard ships patrolling the sea and often accompanied by their fishing trawlers, only serves to heighten rather than diffuse tensions. Of course, Vietnam and other Southeast Asian nations, who were not party to the arbitration, find their own sovereign EEZ rights bolstered by the ruling. This includes Indonesia and Malaysia, since both have experienced encroachment into portions of their EEZ by Chinese fishing vessels in areas China claims as its traditional fishing grounds. Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte’s failure to pursue their nation’s maritime claims against China in the post
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Island of Palmas Case: Mere Proximity Was Not an Adequate Claim to Land Island of Palmas Case, (Scott, Hague Court Reports 2D 83 (1932), (Perm
    island of Palmas case: mere proximity was not an adequate claim to land Island of Palmas Case, (Scott, Hague Court Reports 2d 83 (1932), (Perm. Ct. Arb. 1928), 2 U.N. Rep. Intl. Arb. Awards 829), was a case involving a territorial dispute over the Island of Palmas (or Miangas) between the Netherlands and the United States which was heard by the Permanent Court of Arbitration. The Island of Palmas (known as Pulau Miangas in Bahasa Indonesian) is now within Indonesian sovereignty. This case is one of the most highly influential precedents dealing with island territorial conflicts. Facts of the case Palmas, also referred to as Miangas, is an island of little economic value or strategic location. It is two miles in length, three-quarters of a mile in width, and had a population of about 750 when the decision of the arbitrator was handed down. The island is located between Mindanao, Philippines and the northern most island, known as Nanusa, of what was the former Netherlands East Indies. In 1898, Spain ceded the Philippines to the United States in the Treaty of Paris (1898) and Palmas sat within the boundaries of that cession to the U.S. In 1906, the United States discovered that the Netherlands also claimed sovereignty over the island, and the two parties agreed to submit to binding arbitration by the Permanent Court of Arbitration. On January 23, 1925, the two government signed an agreement to that effect. Ratifications were exchanged in Washington on April 1, 1925. The agreement was registered in League of Nations Treaty Series on May 19, 1925.[1] The arbitrator in the case was Max Huber, a Swiss national.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward an Enhanced Strategic Policy in the Philippines
    Toward an Enhanced Strategic Policy in the Philippines EDITED BY ARIES A. ARUGAY HERMAN JOSEPH S. KRAFT PUBLISHED BY University of the Philippines Center for Integrative and Development Studies Diliman, Quezon City First Printing, 2020 UP CIDS No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, without written permission from the publishers. Recommended Entry: Towards an enhanced strategic policy in the Philippines / edited by Aries A. Arugay, Herman Joseph S. Kraft. -- Quezon City : University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative Studies,[2020],©2020. pages ; cm ISBN 978-971-742-141-4 1. Philippines -- Economic policy. 2. Philippines -- Foreign economic relations. 2. Philippines -- Foreign policy. 3. International economic relations. 4. National Security -- Philippines. I. Arugay, Aries A. II. Kraft, Herman Joseph S. II. Title. 338.9599 HF1599 P020200166 Editors: Aries A. Arugay and Herman Joseph S. Kraft Copy Editors: Alexander F. Villafania and Edelynne Mae R. Escartin Layout and Cover design: Ericson Caguete Printed in the Philippines UP CIDS has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of urls for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ______________________________________ i Foreword Stefan Jost ____________________________________________ iii Teresa S. Encarnacion Tadem _____________________________v List of Abbreviations ___________________________________ ix About the Contributors ________________________________ xiii Introduction The Strategic Outlook of the Philippines: “Situation Normal, Still Muddling Through” Herman Joseph S. Kraft __________________________________1 Maritime Security The South China Sea and East China Sea Disputes: Juxtapositions and Implications for the Philippines Jaime B.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Claim of Sovereignty Over Spratly and Paracel Islands: a Historical and Legal Perspective Teh-Kuang Chang
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 23 | Issue 3 1991 China's Claim of Sovereignty over Spratly and Paracel Islands: A Historical and Legal Perspective Teh-Kuang Chang Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Teh-Kuang Chang, China's Claim of Sovereignty over Spratly and Paracel Islands: A Historical and Legal Perspective, 23 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 399 (1991) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol23/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. China's Claim of Sovereignty Over Spratly and Paracel Islands: A Historical and Legal Perspective Teh-Kuang Chang* I. INTRODUCTION (Dn August 13, 1990, in Singapore, Premier Li Peng of the People's Re- public of China (the PRC) reaffirmed China's sovereignty over Xisha and Nansha Islands.1 On December. 29, 1990, in Taipei, Foreign Minis- ter Frederick Chien stated that the Nansha Islands are territory of the Republic of China.2 Both statements indicated that China's claim to sov- ereignty over the Paracel and Spratly Islands was contrary to the claims of other nations. Since China's claim of Spratly and Paracel Islands is challenged by its neighboring countries, the ownership of the islands in the South China Sea is an unsettled international dispute.3 An understanding of both * Professor of Political Science, Ball State University.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Odyssey-Greek-Translation.Pdf
    05_273-611_Homer 2/Aesop 7/10/00 1:25 PM Page 273 HOMER / The Odyssey, Book One 273 THE ODYSSEY Translated by Robert Fitzgerald The ten-year war waged by the Greeks against Troy, culminating in the overthrow of the city, is now itself ten years in the past. Helen, whose flight to Troy with the Trojan prince Paris had prompted the Greek expedition to seek revenge and reclaim her, is now home in Sparta, living harmoniously once more with her husband Meneláos (Menelaus). His brother Agamémnon, commander in chief of the Greek forces, was murdered on his return from the war by his wife and her paramour. Of the Greek chieftains who have survived both the war and the perilous homeward voyage, all have returned except Odysseus, the crafty and astute ruler of Ithaka (Ithaca), an island in the Ionian Sea off western Greece. Since he is presumed dead, suitors from Ithaka and other regions have overrun his house, paying court to his attractive wife Penélopê, endangering the position of his son, Telémakhos (Telemachus), corrupting many of the servants, and literally eating up Odysseus’ estate. Penélopê has stalled for time but is finding it increasingly difficult to deny the suitors’ demands that she marry one of them; Telémakhos, who is just approaching young manhood, is becom- ing actively resentful of the indignities suffered by his household. Many persons and places in the Odyssey are best known to readers by their Latinized names, such as Telemachus. The present translator has used forms (Telémakhos) closer to the Greek spelling and pronunciation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual and Multiple Naming in the South China Sea: the Cases of the Pratas Islands and Scarborough Shoal
    Dual and multiple naming in the South China Sea: The cases of the Pratas Islands and Scarborough Shoal Peter KANG* This paper mainly discusses the naming of islets, rocks and shoals in the South China Sea by looking at the cases of the Pratas Islands and Scarborough Shoal. The naming of places in the South China Sea has been a symbolic extension of territorial claims of the neighboring countries that have displayed great interest in the said areas. The Pratas Islands are currently under the jurisdiction of Taiwan but are claimed both by China and Taiwan. China and Taiwan name the Pratas Island as Dongsha Qundao and Tungsha Islands respectively. Both nomenclatures share the same literal meaning, “eastern sandy archipelago”, but in different Romanized spellings. Scarborough Shoal is presently under Chinese military occupation, but is claimed by China, the Philippines, and Taiwan, which named it Huangyan Dao (meaning “Yellow Rock Island”), Kulumpol ng Panatag (meaning “Panatag Shoal”), and Minzhu Reef (meaning “Democracy Reef”) respectively. The paper explores both the history of naming and the usage of nomenclatures of the aforementioned cases in the international arena. INTRODUCTION Both the Pratas Islands and Scarborough Shoal are two named geographical features in the South China Sea. The Pratas Islands are located about 310 km southeast of Hong Kong with coordinates of 20°43’ N 116°42’ E. The Islands consist of three atolls, namely, Pratas Atoll, North Vereker Atoll and South Vereker Atoll. Pratas Atoll is circular in shape, and Pratas Island is in the west of the atoll. The North Vereker Bank and South Vereker Bank are adjacent to each other and are about 74 km to the northwest of the Pratas Atoll.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Dokdo
    Resolution of Territorial Disputes in East Asia: The Case of Dokdo Laurent Mayali & John Yoo* This Article seeks to contribute to solving of the Korea-Japan territorial dispute over Dokdo island (Korea)/Takeshima (Japanese). The Republic of Korea argues that Dokdo has formed a part of Korea since as early as 512 C.E.; as Korea currently exercises control over the island, its claim to discovery would appear to fulfill the legal test for possession of territory. Conversely, the Japanese government claims that Korea never exercised sufficient sovereignty over Dokdo. Japan claims that the island remained terra nullius—in other words, territory not possessed by any nation and so could be claimed—until it annexed Dokdo in 1905. Japan also claims that in the 1951 peace treaty ending World War II, the Allies did not include Dokdo in the list of islands taken from Japan, which implies that Japan retained the island in the postwar settlement. This article makes three contributions. First, it brings forward evidence from the maps held at various archives in the United States and Western Europe to determine the historical opinions of experts and governments about the possession of Dokdo. Second, it clarifies the factors that have guided international tribunals in their resolution of earlier disputes involving islands and maritime territory. Third, it shows how the claim of terra nullius has little legitimate authority when applied to East Asia, an area where empires, kingdoms, and nation-states had long exercised control over territory. * Laurent Mayali is the Lloyd M. Robbins Professor of Law, University of California at Berkeley School of Law; John Yoo is the Emanuel S.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Island Communications
    SOUTH CHINA SEA MILITARY CAPABILITY SERIES A Survey of Technologies and Capabilities on China’s Military Outposts in the South China Sea INTER-ISLAND COMMUNICATIONS J. Michael Dahm INTER-ISLAND COMMUNICATIONS J. Michael Dahm Copyright © 2020 The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC. All Rights Reserved. This study contains the best opinion of the author based on publicly available, open- source information at time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the assessments or opinions of APL sponsors. The author is responsible for all analysis and annotations of satellite images contained in this report. Satellite images are published under license from Maxar Technologies/DigitalGlobe, Inc., which retains copyrights to the original images. Satellite images in this report may not be reproduced without the express permission of JHU/APL and Maxar Technologies/DigitalGlobe, Inc. See Appendix A for notes on sources and analytic methods. NSAD-R-20-048 July 2020 Inter-Island Communicaitons Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Troposcatter Communications, 散射通信 ..................................................................... 2 VHF/UHF and Other Line-of-Sight Communications ...................................................... 6 4G Cellular Communications ........................................................................................ 7 Airborne Communications Layer .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • China's Unpredictable Maritime Security Actors
    China’s unpredictable maritime Linda Jakobson security actors December 2014 CHINA’S UNPREDICTABLE MARITIME SECURITY ACTORS The Lowy Institute for International Policy is an independent policy think tank. Its mandate ranges across all the dimensions of international policy debate in Australia – economic, political and strategic – and it is not limited to a particular geographic region. Its two core tasks are to: • produce distinctive research and fresh policy options for Australia’s international policy and to contribute to the wider international debate. • promote discussion of Australia’s role in the world by providing an accessible and high-quality forum for discussion of Australian international relations through debates, seminars, lectures, dialogues and conferences. The views expressed in this paper are entirely the author’s own and not those of the Lowy Institute for International Policy. CHINA’S UNPREDICTABLE MARITIME SECURITY ACTORS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In recent years China’s good-neighbourly pledges of increased trade and investment have stood in stark contrast with its provocative actions in its near seas. In part this reflects contradictions in China’s core interests. On the one hand, economic growth — vital for China’s political stability — requires cooperative relations with neighbours. On the other hand, defending sovereignty causes friction with neighbours who are rival claimants to contested islands and seas on China’s periphery. China’s claims in the East and South China Seas have not changed in decades. What has changed is China’s capacity and desire to defend its maritime claims. Moreover, since becoming leader, Xi Jinping has placed greater emphasis on defending China’s sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • China Versus Vietnam: an Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea Raul (Pete) Pedrozo
    A CNA Occasional Paper China versus Vietnam: An Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea Raul (Pete) Pedrozo With a Foreword by CNA Senior Fellow Michael McDevitt August 2014 Unlimited distribution Distribution unlimited. for public release This document contains the best opinion of the authors at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Cover Photo: South China Sea Claims and Agreements. Source: U.S. Department of Defense’s Annual Report on China to Congress, 2012. Distribution Distribution unlimited. Specific authority contracting number: E13PC00009. Copyright © 2014 CNA This work was created in the performance of Contract Number 2013-9114. Any copyright in this work is subject to the Government's Unlimited Rights license as defined in FAR 52-227.14. The reproduction of this work for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited. Nongovernmental users may copy and distribute this document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this copyright notice is reproduced in all copies. Nongovernmental users may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies they make or distribute. Nongovernmental users may not accept compensation of any manner in exchange for copies. All other rights reserved. This project was made possible by a generous grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation Approved by: August 2014 Ken E. Gause, Director International Affairs Group Center for Strategic Studies Copyright © 2014 CNA FOREWORD This legal analysis was commissioned as part of a project entitled, “U.S. policy options in the South China Sea.” The objective in asking experienced U.S international lawyers, such as Captain Raul “Pete” Pedrozo, USN, Judge Advocate Corps (ret.),1 the author of this analysis, is to provide U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia's Claims and Positions Over Maritime Features in the South
    Malaysia’s Claims and Positions over Maritime Features In the South China Sea Jalila Abdul Jalil, Senior Researcher, MIMA 10th South China Sea Conference Cooperation for Regional Security and Development Da Nang City, Viet Nam Thursday, 8 November1 2018 Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation reflects the personal views of the presenter 2 Outline of Presentation • Introduction • Malaysia’s claims in the South China Sea • Malaysia’s position in the South China Sea • Extended continental shelf claim in the Defined Area in the South China Sea • Lessons from Philippines Arbitration relating to Malaysia’s Claim in the South China: Possible Consideration 3 Malaysia’s Claims in the South China Sea 4 Map showing the aerial view of the South China Sea Source: Malaysia Airport Berhad 6 Source: Forbes and Basiron, (2008) Malaysia’s Maritime Realm Atlas • This map shows in general the overlapping claims in the South China Sea Map of the Competing Claims of the South China Sea by Arsana and Schofield, 2012 from Agora: South China Sea (2013), Vol. 107:95, American Journal of International Law (AJIL) . 8 Malaysia’s claims in the South China Sea • Malaysia’s claim are encapsulated in Malaysia’s Peta Baru 1979. • The Map was drawn based on the 1958 Geneva Convention, bilateral treaties and customary international law • Malaysia’s claim is based on the fact that the features are part of its continental shelf and thus entitles Malaysia to an extended continental shelf based on the natural prolongation of the continental shelf. • Malaysia can claims the respective maritime zones namely territorial sea, EEZ and continental shelf.
    [Show full text]
  • The South China Sea Arbitration Case Filed by the Philippines Against China: Arguments Concerning Low Tide Elevations, Rocks, and Islands
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Xiamen University Institutional Repository 322 China Oceans Law Review (Vol. 2015 No. 1) The South China Sea Arbitration Case Filed by the Philippines against China: Arguments concerning Low Tide Elevations, Rocks, and Islands Yann-huei SONG* Abstract: On March 30, 2014, the Philippines submitted its Memorial to the Arbitral Tribunal, which presents the country’s case on the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the merits of its claims. In the Memorial, the Philippines argues that Mischief Reef, Second Thomas Shoal, Subi Reef, Gaven Reef, McKennan Reef, Hughes Reef are low-tide elevations, and that Scarborough Shoal, Johnson Reef, Cuarteron Reef, and Fiery Cross Reef are “rocks”, therefore these land features cannot generate entitlement to a 200-nautical-mile EEZ or continental shelf. This paper discusses if the claims made by the Philippines are well founded in fact and law. It concludes that it would be difficult for the Tribunal to rule in favor of the Philippines’ claims. Key Words: Arbitration; South China Sea; China; The Philippines; Low tide elevation; Island; Rock; UNCLOS I. Introduction On January 22, 2013, the Republic of the Philippines (hereinafter “the Philippines”) initiated arbitral proceedings against the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter “China” or “PRC”) when it presented a Note Verbale1 to the Chinese * Yann-huie Song, Professor, Institute of Marine Affairs, College of Marine Sciences, Sun- yet Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan and Research Fellow, Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Showing Their Support
    MILITARY FACES COLLEGE BASKETBALL Exchange shoppers Gillian Anderson Harvard coach Amaker set sights on new embodies Thatcher created model for others Xbox, PlayStation in ‘The Crown’ on social justice issues Page 3 Page 18 Back page South Korea to issue fines for not wearing masks in public » Page 5 stripes.com Volume 79, No. 151 ©SS 2020 MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2020 50¢/Free to Deployed Areas WAR ON TERRORISM US, Israel worked together to track, kill al-Qaida No. 2 BY MATTHEW LEE AND JAMES LAPORTA Associated Press WASHINGTON — The United States and Israel worked together to track and kill a senior al-Qaida operative in Iran this year, a bold intelligence operation by the allied nations that came as the Trump ad- ministration was ramping up pres- sure on Tehran. Four current and former U.S. offi- cials said Abu Mohammed al-Masri, al-Qaida’s No. 2, was killed by assas- sins in the Iranian capital in August. The U.S. provided intelligence to the Israelis on where they could find al- Masri and the alias he was using at the time, while Israeli agents carried out the killing, according to two of the officials. The two other officials confirmed al-Masri’s killing but could not provide specific details. Al-Masri was gunned down in a Tehran alley on Aug. 7, the anni- versary of the 1998 bombings of the U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Al- Masri was widely believed to have participated in the planning of those attacks and was wanted on terrorism charges by the FBI.
    [Show full text]