DOCSLIB.ORG

Qt8sq6520t.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Qt8sq6520t.Pdf Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title Heavy quarkonium: Progress, puzzles, and opportunities Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8sq6520t Journal European Physical Journal C, 71(2) ISSN 1434-6044 Authors Brambilla, N Eidelman, S Heltsley, BK et al. Publication Date 2011 DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1534-9 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Eur. Phys. J. C (2011) 71: 1534 DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1534-9 Review Heavy quarkonium: progress, puzzles, and opportunities ∗ † ∗ † ∗ † ∗ † † † † N. Brambilla1, , , S. Eidelman2,3, , ,B.K.Heltsley4,a, , , R. Vogt5,6, , ,G.T.Bodwin7, , E. Eichten8, , A.D. Frawley9, , † † † † † † † A.B. Meyer10, , R.E. Mitchell11, , V. Papadimitriou8, , P. Petreczky12, ,A.A.Petrov13, ,P.Robbe14, ,A.Vairo1, , A. Andronic15, R. Arnaldi16, P. Artoisenet17,G.Bali18, A. Bertolin19, D. Bettoni20, J. Brodzicka21, G.E. Bruno22, A. Caldwell23,J.Catmore24, C.-H. Chang25,26, K.-T. Chao27, E. Chudakov28, P. Cortese16, P. Crochet29, A. Drutskoy30, U. Ellwanger31, P. Faccioli32, A. Gabareen Mokhtar33, X. Garcia i Tormo34, C. Hanhart35, F.A. Harris36, D.M. Kaplan37, S.R. Klein38,H.Kowalski10, J.-P. Lansberg39,40,E.Levichev2, V. Lombardo41, C. Lourenço42, F. Maltoni43, A. Mocsy44, R. Mussa16, F.S. Navarra45, M. Negrini20,M.Nielsen45,S.L.Olsen46, P. Pakhlov47, G. Pakhlova47, K. Peters15,A.D.Polosa48,W.Qian49,14,J.-W.Qiu12,50, G. Rong51, M.A. Sanchis-Lozano52, E. Scomparin16, P. Senger15,F.Simon23,53, S. Stracka41,54, Y. Sumino55, M. Voloshin56, C. Weiss28, H.K. Wöhri32, C.-Z. Yuan51 1Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Str. 1, 85748 Garching, Germany 2Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia 3Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia 4Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 5Physics Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551, USA 6Physics Department, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA 7High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, USA 8Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA 9Physics Department, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-4350, USA 10Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany 11Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA 12Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973-5000, USA 13Department of Physics and Astronomy, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA 14Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire, IN2P3/CNRS and Université Paris-Sud 11, Centre Scientifique d’Orsay, BP 34, 91898 Orsay Cedex, France 15GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany 16INFN Sezione di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy 17Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 18Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Regensburg, 93040 Regensburg, Germany 19INFN Sezione di Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy 20Università di Ferrara and INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Via del Paradiso 12, 44100 Ferrara, Italy 21Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland 22Università di Bari and INFN Sezione di Bari, Via Amendola 173, 70126 Bari, Italy 23Max Planck Institute for Physics, München, Germany 24Department of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YB, UK 25CCAST (World Laboratory), P.O. Box 8730, Beijing 100190, China 26Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 27Department of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 28Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, 12000 Jefferson Ave., Newport News, VA 23606, USA 29Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, CNRS-IN2P3, LPC, BP 10448, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France 30University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA 31Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, Unité mixte de Recherche, CNRS, UMR 8627, Université de Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France 32LIP, Av. Elias Garcia 14, 1000-149 Lisbon, Portugal 33SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford, CA 94309, USA 34Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G7 35Institut für Kernphysik, Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, and Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany 36Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA 37Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, USA 38Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 39IPNO, Université Paris-Sud 11, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France 40Centre de Physique Théorique, École Polytechnique, CNRS, 91128 Palaiseau, France 41INFN Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy 42CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland 43Center for Cosmology, Particle Physics and Phenomenology, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Page 2 of 178 Eur. Phys. J. C (2011) 71: 1534 44Department of Math and Science, Pratt Institute, 200 Willoughby Ave, ARC LL G-35, Brooklyn, NY 11205, USA 45Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, C.P. 66318, 05315-970 São Paulo, SP, Brazil 46Department of Physics & Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea 47Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow 117218, Russia 48INFN Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Roma, Italy 49Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 50C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3840, USA 51Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 52Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC) and Departamento de Física Teórica, Centro Mixto Universitat de Valencia-CSIC, Doctor Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain 53Excellence Cluster ‘Universe’, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany 54Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy 55Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan 56William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, 116 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA Received: 28 October 2010 / Published online: 8 February 2011 © Springer-Verlag / Società Italiana di Fisica 2011 Abstract A golden age for heavy-quarkonium physics New effective field theories for the description of quarko- dawned a decade ago, initiated by the confluence of excit- nium in different regimes have been developed and brought ing advances in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and an to a high degree of sophistication, thus enabling precise explosion of related experimental activity. The early years and solid theoretical predictions. Many expected decays and of this period were chronicled in the Quarkonium Working transitions have either been measured with precision or for Group (QWG) CERN Yellow Report (YR) in 2004, which the first time, but the confusing patterns of decays, both presented a comprehensive review of the status of the field above and below open-flavor thresholds, endure and have at that time and provided specific recommendations for fur- deepened. The intriguing details of quarkonium suppres- ther progress. However, the broad spectrum of subsequent sion in heavy-ion collisions that have emerged from RHIC breakthroughs, surprises, and continuing puzzles could only have elevated the importance of separating hot- and cold- be partially anticipated. Since the release of the YR, the nuclear-matter effects in quark–gluon plasma studies. This BESII program concluded only to give birth to BESIII; the review systematically addresses all these matters and con- B-factories and CLEO-c flourished; quarkonium production cludes by prioritizing directions for ongoing and future ef- and polarization measurements at HERA and the Tevatron forts. matured; and heavy-ion collisions at RHIC have opened a window on the deconfinement regime. All these experiments leave legacies of quality, precision, and unsolved myster- Contents ies for quarkonium physics, and therefore beg for contin- uing investigations at BESIII, the LHC, RHIC, FAIR, the 1 Introduction . 3 Super Flavor and/or Tau–Charm factories, JLab, the ILC, 2 Spectroscopy . 6 and beyond. The list of newly found conventional states ex- 2.1 Conventional vectors above open-flavor h ( P) χ ( P) B+ η ( S) panded to include c 1 , c2 2 , c , and b 1 .In threshold ................... 7 addition, the unexpected and still-fascinating X(3872) has 2.2 Newly found conventional quarkonia . 11 been joined by more than a dozen other charmonium- and 2.3 New unanticipated states . 17 bottomonium-like “XYZ” states that appear to lie outside 2.4 Characteristics of quarkonium systems . 28 the quark model. Many of these still need experimental con- 2.5 Nonrelativistic effective field theories . 30 firmation. The plethora of new states unleashed a flood of 2.6 Lattice QCD spectrum calculations . 32 theoretical investigations into new forms of matter such as 2.7 Predictions for the η (1S) mass....... 35 quark–gluon hybrids, mesonic molecules, and tetraquarks. b 2.8 Standard Model parameter extractions . 35 Measurements of the spectroscopy, decays, production, and 2.9 Exotic states and states near or above in-medium behavior of cc¯, bb¯, and bc¯ bound states have threshold.................... 38 been shown to validate some theoretical approaches to QCD and highlight lack of quantitative success for others. Lattice QCD has grown from a tool with computational possibil- a e-mail:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Book of Abstracts Ii Contents
    2014 CAP Congress / Congrès de l’ACP 2014 Sunday, 15 June 2014 - Friday, 20 June 2014 Laurentian University / Université Laurentienne Book of Abstracts ii Contents An Analytic Mathematical Model to Explain the Spiral Structure and Rotation Curve of NGC 3198. .......................................... 1 Belle-II: searching for new physics in the heavy flavor sector ................ 1 The high cost of science disengagement of Canadian Youth: Reimagining Physics Teacher Education for 21st Century ................................. 1 What your advisor never told you: Education for the ’Real World’ ............. 2 Back to the Ionosphere 50 Years Later: the CASSIOPE Enhanced Polar Outflow Probe (e- POP) ............................................. 2 Changing students’ approach to learning physics in undergraduate gateway courses . 3 Possible Astrophysical Observables of Quantum Gravity Effects near Black Holes . 3 Supersymmetry after the LHC data .............................. 4 The unintentional irradiation of a live human fetus: assessing the likelihood of a radiation- induced abortion ...................................... 4 Using Conceptual Multiple Choice Questions ........................ 5 Search for Supersymmetry at ATLAS ............................. 5 **WITHDRAWN** Monte Carlo Field-Theoretic Simulations for Melts of Diblock Copoly- mer .............................................. 6 Surface tension effects in soft composites ........................... 6 Correlated electron physics in quantum materials ...................... 6 The
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Story of the Quantum
    THE STRANGE STORY OF QUANTUM An account for the GENERAL READER of the growth of the IDEAS underlying our present ATOMIC KNOWLEDGE B A N E S H HOFFMANN DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, QUEENS COLLEGE, NEW YORK Second Edition DOVER PUBLICATIONS, INC. NEW YORK Copyright 1947, by Banesh Hoffmann. Copyright 1959, by Banesh Hoffmann. All rights reserved under Pan American and International Copyright Conventions. Published simultaneously in Canada by McClelland & Stewart, Ltd. This new Dover edition first published in 1959 is an unabridged and corrected republication of the First Edition to which the author has added a 1959 Postscript. Manufactured in the United States of America. Dover Publications, Inc. 180 Varick Street New York 14, N. Y. My grateful thanks are due to my friends Carl G. Hempel, Melber Phillips, and Mark W. Zemansky, f r many valuable sug- gestions, and to the Institute for Advanced Study where this booJc was begun. B. HOFFMCANIST The Institute for Advanced Study Princeton, N, J v February, 1947 ' / fit, (,. ,,,.| CONTENTS Preface ix I PROLOGUE i ACT I II The Quantum is Conceived 16 III It Comes to Light 24 IV Tweedledum and Tweedledee 34 V The Atom of Niels Bohr 43 VI The Atom of Bohr Kneels 60 INTERMEZZO VII Author's Warning to the Reader 70 ACT II VIII The Exploits of the Revolutionary Prince 72 IX Laundry Lists Are Discarded 84 X The Asceticism of Paul 105 XI Electrons Arc Smeared 109 XII Unification 124 XIII The Strange Denouement 140 XIV The New Landscape of Science 174 XV EPILOGUE 200 Postscript: 1999 235 PREFACE THIS book is designed to serve as a guide to those who would explore the theories by which the scientist seeks to comprehend the mysterious world of the atom.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Field Theories of Heavy-Quark Mesons
    Effective Field Theories of Heavy-Quark Mesons A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in the faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences Mohammad Hasan M Alhakami School of Physics and Astronomy 2014 Contents Abstract 10 Declaration 12 Copyright 13 Acknowledgements 14 1 Introduction 16 1.1 Ordinary Mesons......................... 21 1.1.1 Light Mesons....................... 22 1.1.2 Heavy-light Mesons.................... 24 1.1.3 Heavy-Quark Mesons................... 28 1.2 Exotic cc¯ Mesons......................... 31 1.2.1 Experimental and theoretical studies of the X(3872). 34 2 From QCD to Effective Theories 41 2.1 Chiral Symmetry......................... 43 2.1.1 Chiral Symmetry Breaking................ 46 2.1.2 Effective Field Theory.................. 57 2.2 Heavy Quark Spin Symmetry.................. 65 2.2.1 Motivation......................... 65 2.2.2 Heavy Quark Effective Theory.............. 69 3 Heavy Hadron Chiral Perturbation Theory 72 3.1 Self-Energies of Charm Mesons................. 78 3.2 Mass formula for non-strange charm mesons.......... 89 3.2.1 Extracting the coupling constant of even and odd charm meson transitions..................... 92 2 4 HHChPT for Charm and Bottom Mesons 98 4.1 LECs from Charm Meson Spectrum............... 99 4.2 Masses of the charm mesons within HHChPT......... 101 4.3 Linear combinations of the low energy constants........ 106 4.4 Results and Discussion...................... 108 4.5 Prediction for the Spectrum of Odd- and Even-Parity Bottom Mesons............................... 115 5 Short-range interactions between heavy mesons in frame- work of EFT 126 5.1 Uncoupled Channel........................ 127 5.2 Two-body scattering with a narrow resonance........
    [Show full text]
  • Binding of Muonated Hydrogen Molecules and Born–Oppenheimer
    Canadian Journal of Physics Binding of muonated hydrogen molecules and Born- Oppenheimer approximation revisited Journal: Canadian Journal of Physics Manuscript ID cjp-2019-0061.R1 Manuscript Type:ForArticle Review Only Date Submitted by the 29-Jul-2019 Author: Complete List of Authors: Varandas, António; University of Coimbra Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Department of Chemistry; Qufu Normal University, School of Physics and Physical Engineering da Providência, joão; University of Coimbra, Department of Physics da Providência, João; University of Beira Interior, Department of Physics Muonated Hydrogen, Born-Oppenheimer approximation, μ-mesonic Keyword: molecules, Interatomic forces, stability of fermionic particles Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com//cjp-pubs −75 Page 1 of 15 Canadian Journal of Physics −80 p µ −85 For Review Only2 2 5−param 3−param −90 5−param 3−param −95 energy / a.u. −100 −105 −110 0.00 0.01 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com//cjp-pubs0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 interatomic distance, c / a.u. Canadian Journal of Physics Page 2 of 15 Binding of muonated hydrogen molecules and Born-Oppenheimer approximation revisited A.J.C. Varandas∗ School of Physics and Physical Engineering, Qufu Normal University, 273165 Qufu, China and Chemistry Centre and Department of Chemistry, University of Coimbra, 3004-535 Coimbra, Portugal J. da Provid^enciay Department of Physics, University of Coimbra, P 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal For ReviewJ. P. da Provid^encia Onlyz Department of Physics, University of Beira Interior, P-6201-001 Covilh~a,Portugal The stability of four fermionic particles with unit charge, of which, two are positively, and two negatively charged, is discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Chromodynamics Theory of Tetraquarks and Mesomesonic Particles Unfinished Draft Version
    The Quantum Chromodynamics Theory Of Tetraquarks And Mesomesonic Particles Unfinished draft version Based on a generalized particle diagram of baryons and anti-baryons which, in turn, is based on symmetry principles, this theory predicts the existence of all the tetraquarks and dimeson molecules (mesomesonic particles) there exist in nature. by R. A. Frino Electronics Engineer - Degree from the University of Mar del Plata. March 4th, 2016 (v1) Keywords: mirror symmetry, parity, P symmetry, charge conjugation, C symmetry, time reversal, T symmetry, CP symmetry, CPT symmetry, PC+ symmetry, Q symmetry, quantum electrodynamics, quantum chromodynamics, quark, antiquark, up quark, down quark, strange quark, charm quark, bottom quark, top quark, anti-up quark, anti-down quark, anti-strange quark, anti-charm quark, anti-bottom quark, anti-top quark, tetraquark, pentaquark, antitetraquark, non-strange tetraquark, colour charge, anticolour, anticolour charge, strangeness, charmness, bottomness, topness, fermion, hadron, baryon, meson, boson, photon, gluon, mesobaryonic particle, meso-baryonic particle, mesobaryonic molecule, meso-mesonic molecule, meso-mesonic particle, dimeson particle, dimeson molecule, Pauli exclusion principle, force carrier, omega- minus particle, matter-antimatter way, quadruply flavoured tetraquark, MAW, MMP, MMM, LHC. (see next page) The Quantum Chromodynamics Theory Of Tetraquarks And Mesomesonic Particles - v1. Copyright © 2016 Rodolfo A. Frino. All rights reserved. 1 1. Introduction Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) [1, 2, 3, 4] is a quantum mechanical description of the strong nuclear force. The strong force is mediated by gluons [4, 5] which are spin 1ℏ bosons (spin is quoted in units of reduced Plank's constant: ℏ =h/2π ). Gluons act on quarks only (only quarks feel the strong force).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2104.09923V1 [Hep-Ph] 20 Apr 2021
    Prepared for submission to JHEP The Stochastic Axiverse Mario Reiga aInstituto de F´ısica Corpuscular (CSIC-Universitat de Val`encia),C/ Catedr´atico Jos´eBeltr´an2, E-46980 Paterna (Valencia), Spain E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: In addition to spectacular signatures such as black hole superradiance and the rotation of CMB polarization, the plenitude of axions appearing in the string axiverse may have potentially dangerous implications. An example is the cosmological overproduction of relic axions and moduli by the misalignment mechanism, more pronounced in regions where the signals mentioned above may be observable, that is for large axion decay constant. In this work, we study the minimal requirements to soften this problem and show that the fundamental requirement is a long period of low-scale inflation. However, in this case, if the inflationary Hubble scale is lower than around O(100) eV, no relic DM axion is produced in the early Universe. Cosmological production of some axions may be activated, via the misalignment mechanism, if their potential minimum changes between inflation and today. As a particular example, we study in detail how the maximal-misalignment mechanism dilutes the effect of dangerous axions and allows the production of axion DM in a controlled way. In this case, the potential of the axion that realises the mechanism shifts by a factor ∆θ = π between the inflationary epoch and today, and the axion starts to oscillate from the top of its potential. We also show that axions with masses ma ∼ O(1 − 100) H0 realising the maximal-misalignment mechanism generically behave as dark energy with a decay constant that can take values well below the Planck scale, avoiding problems associated to arXiv:2104.09923v2 [hep-ph] 12 Sep 2021 super-Planckian scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Heavy-Light Tetraquark System ¯ B ¯ Bud Using Lattice NRQCD
    Master Thesis Investigation of the Heavy-Light Tetraquark System ¯b¯bud Using Lattice NRQCD Martin Pflaumer Institut für Theoretische Physik Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main 26 September 2018 Supervisor and 1st Examiner 2nd Examiner Prof. Dr. Marc Wagner Prof. Dr. Stefan Meinel Goethe-Universität University of Arizona Frankfurt am Main Tucson, Arizona Erklärung nach § 30 (12) Ordnung für den Bachelor- und Masterstudiengang Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die Arbeit selbständig und ohne Benutzung anderer als der angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel verfasst habe. Alle Stellen der Arbeit, die wörtlich oder sinngemäß aus Veröffentlichungen oder aus anderen fremden Texten entnommen wurden, sind von mir als solche kenntlich gemacht worden. Ferner erkläre ich, dass die Arbeit nicht - auch nicht auszugsweise - für eine andere Prüfung verwendet wurde. Frankfurt am Main, 26. September 2018 Martin Pflaumer Abstract In this thesis, we focus on the heavy-light tetraquark system with the quark content ¯b¯bud. We established the formulation of non-relativistic QCD and derived the required expressions for a non-relativistic treatment of the tetraquark system. In the framework of NRQCD, we consider several creation operators for generating a ¯b¯bud state in the I(J P ) = 0(1+) channel and construct the associated correlation matrix. Afterwards, searching for bound states in this system, we extract the effective masses and compare them to the BB∗ threshold in order to make reliable statements about stable states. Performing a detailed analysis including different lattice gauge link ensembles and extrapolating these results to the physical pion mass, we find a bound ¯b¯bud state with a binding energy of +39 E¯b¯bud = −99 −39 MeV.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Physics a Exotic Hadrons and Hadron-Hadron Interactions In
    Nuclear Physics A Nuclear Physics A 00 (2013) 1–8 Exotic hadrons and hadron-hadron interactions in heavy ion collisionsI A. Ohnishia, S. Chob, T. Furumotoc, T. Hyodod, D. Jidoa, C. M. Koe, K. Moritaa, S. H. Leeb, M. Nielsenf, T. Sekiharag, S. Yasuig, K. Yazakih, (ExHIC Collaboration) aYukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Japan bInstitute of Physics and Applied Physics, Yonsei University, Korea cIchinoseki National College of Technology, Japan dDepartment of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan eCyclotron Institute and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A & M University, USA fInstituto de F´ısica,Universidade de S˜aoPaulo, Brazil gInstitute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, KEK, Japan hRIKEN Nishina Center, Japan Abstract We discuss the exotic hadron structure and hadron-hadron interactions in view of heavy ion collisions. First, we demonstrate that a hadronic molecule with a large spatial size would be produced more abundantly in the coalescence model compared with the statistical model result. Secondly, we constrain the ΛΛ interaction by using the recently measured ΛΛ correlation data. We find −1 that the RHIC-STAR data favor the ΛΛ scattering parameters in the range 1=a0 ≤ −0:8 fm and reff ≥ 3 fm. c 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Keywords: Exotic hadrons, Heavy ion collisions, Hadronic molecule, Two particle correlation, ΛΛ interaction, H particle 1. Introduction The first dozen of years in the 21st century may be recognized as the starting point of the exotic hadron renaissance. In textbooks, hadrons are explained asqq ¯ (mesons) or qqq (baryons) composites, and many of the hadron masses are well described in the quark model.
    [Show full text]
  • X(3872) in the Molecular Model Arxiv:1811.01324V2 [Hep-Ph] 29
    X(3872) in the molecular model Yu. S. Kalashnikovaa;b, A. V. Nefedievb a Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 117218, B.Cheremushkinskaya 25, Moscow, Russia b P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, Leninskiy Prospect 53, Moscow, Russia Abstract We discuss methods and approaches to the description of molecular states in the spectrum of heavy quarks and investigate in detail various properties of the exotic charmonium-like state X(3872) in the framework of the mesonic molecule model. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Definitions and conventions 6 3 Elementary or compound state? 9 3.1 Coupled-channel scheme . 10 3.2 Weinberg formulae, singularity structure and underlying dynamics . 13 3.3 Interplay of quark and meson degrees of freedom: two-channel case . 17 4 A microscopic quark model for the X(3872) 21 5 Nature of the X(3872) from data 26 6 X(3872) and pionic degrees of freedom 35 6.1 DD¯ ∗ DDπ¯ DD¯ ∗ coupled-channel system . 35 6.2 One-pion$ exchange$ in the X(3872) ....................... 38 arXiv:1811.01324v2 [hep-ph] 29 Aug 2019 6.3 Elastic line shape of the X(3872) with the three-body dynamics included . 43 7 Remark on the lattice calculations for the X(3872) 46 8 Radiative decays of the X(3872) 48 9 Conclusions 52 1 1 Introduction In the end of the 20-th and at the very beginning of this century, charmonium spectroscopy was considered as a respectable but a bit dull subject. Indeed, since the charmonium revo- lution of 1974, all cc¯ excitations below the open-charm threshold were discovered, together with a fair amount of higher vector states directly accessible in the e+e− annihilation.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of the Structure of the X(3872) in P̄a Collisions
    Physics Letters B 749 (2015) 35–43 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Determination of the structure of the X(3872) in pA¯ collisions ∗ A.B. Larionov a,b, , M. Strikman c, M. Bleicher a,d a Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany b National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 123182 Moscow, Russia c Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA d Institut für Theoretische Physik, J.W. Goethe-Universität, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Currently, the structure of the X(3872) meson is unknown. Different competing models of the cc¯ Received 11 February 2015 exotic state X(3872) exist, including the possibilities that this state is either a mesonic molecule with 0 ¯ ∗0 Received in revised form 29 May 2015 dominating D D + c.c. composition, a ccq¯ q¯ tetraquark, or a cc¯-gluon hybrid state. It is expected that Accepted 19 July 2015 the X(3872) state is rather strongly coupled to the pp¯ channel and, therefore, can be produced in pp¯ and Available online 22 July 2015 pA¯ collisions at PANDA. We propose to test the hypothetical molecular structure of X(3872) by studying Editor: V. Metag ¯ ∗ the D or D stripping reactions on a nuclear residue. Keywords: © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license 3 X(3872) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
    [Show full text]
  • Tetraquark Interpolating Fields in a Lattice QCD Investigation of The
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 101, 034502 (2020) Editors' Suggestion Tetraquark interpolating fields in a lattice QCD investigation à ð Þ of the Ds0 2317 meson Constantia Alexandrou,1,2 Joshua Berlin,3 Jacob Finkenrath,4 Theodoros Leontiou ,5 and Marc Wagner 3 1Department of Physics, University of Cyprus, P.O. Box 20537, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus 2Computation-based Science and Technology Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, 20 Kavafi Street, 2121 Nicosia, Cyprus 3Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Institut für Theoretische Physik, Max-von-Laue-Straße 1, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 4Computation-based Science and Technology Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, 20 Kavafi Street, 2121 Nicosia, Cyprus 5Department of Mechanical Engineering, Frederick University, 1036 Nicosia, Cyprus (Received 4 December 2019; accepted 15 January 2020; published 4 February 2020) à We investigate the Ds0ð2317Þ meson using lattice QCD and considering correlation functions of several cs¯ two-quark and cs¯ ðuu¯ þ dd¯ Þ four-quark interpolating fields. These interpolating fields generate different structures in color, spin and position space including quark-antiquark pairs, tetraquarks and two-meson scattering states. For our computation we use an ensemble simulated with pion mass mπ ≈ 0.296 GeV and spatial volume of extent 2.90 fm. We find in addition to the expected spectrum of two-meson scattering à states another state around 60 MeV below the DK threshold, which we interpret as the Ds0ð2317Þ meson. This state couples predominantly to a quark-antiquark interpolating field and only weakly to a DK two- meson interpolating field. The coupling to the tetraquark interpolating fields is essentially 0, rendering a à tetraquark interpretation of the Ds0ð2317Þ meson rather unlikely.
    [Show full text]
  • Master-Thesis Search for New Bottomonium(-Like)
    Master-Thesis Search for new bottomonium(-like) states in e+e− ! B(∗)B¯(∗)(π)(π) at the BELLE experiment Suche nach neuen Bottomonium(-artigen) Zuständen in e+e− ! B(∗)B¯(∗)(π)(π) am BELLE-Experiment Marcel Werner November 22, 2010 II. Physikalisches Institut Arbeitsgruppe Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Kühn Abstract Since many theoretically predicted bottomonium states have not been experimentally discovered yet, a search for new bottomonium(-like) states in e+e− ! B(∗)B¯(∗)(π)(π) reactions is accomplished. An inclusive dilepton approach is used for tagging B mesons from energy scan data between Υ(4S) and Υ(6S) collected at BELLE. Additional pions are considered to enhance the contributions of states with quantum numbers J PC = +± 1 . The Υ(5S) lineshape parameters are determined to φΥ5S = −1:512 ± 0:066, µΥ5S = 10:838 ± 0:067 GeV and ΓΥ5S = 0:106 ± 0:0087 GeV. First evidence for B pro- duction in Υ(6S) decays has been found. The consideration of additional pions brought no evidence for new J PC = 1+± bottomonium(-like) states between the Υ(4S) and the 0 (∗)0 (∗)0 0 Υ(6S) resonance. The branching fraction B Υ(5S) ! Xb π (γ) ! B B¯ π (γ) was estimated to be smaller than 5:05 ± 0:14 % at 90% confidence level. Contents Introduction9 1. Physics Principles 11 1.1. The Standard Model............................. 11 1.2. Heavy Quark-Antiquark Potentials and Bottomonium Eigenstates... 14 1.2.1. Schroedinger Equation........................ 14 1.2.2. The Cornell Potential........................ 15 1.2.3. Perturbative QCD and Breit Interaction.............. 16 1.2.4. The Spin Interactions.......................
    [Show full text]