DOCSLIB.ORG

RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE Eastern Portal Development Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE Eastern Portal Development Plan RIA-MGA-EPZ-ZWD-PLA-XEV-NAP-X0001 Revision: 021 Package: 000-134-20 Date: 09 July 2020 DOCUMENT INFORMATION Document Field Description RPV Document No. RIA-MGA-EPZ-ZWD-PLA-XEV-NAP-X0001 File Name RIA-AEC-PLA-210-134-20-0001 Package Name Eastern Portal – Development Plan DOCUMENT RECORD Submission Date Revision Prepared By Reviewed By Approved By Status Phase 23/04/2019 00 Gabrielle Noel Rachel Issued for Final Coddington Matthews Harding use and Kaity Munro 25/05/2020 01 Andy Choi Aime Bigornia Kaity Munro Issued for Final use 09/07/2020 02 Andy Choi Aime Bigornia Kaity Munro Issued for Draft review The Rail Infrastructure Alliance (the Alliance) has prepared this document for the sole use of the Alliance, Rail Projects Victoria and Metro Trains Melbourne. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of the Alliance, Rail Projects Victoria and Metro Trains Melbourne. The foregoing undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. This document has been prepared based on a particular set of requirements and assumptions for the purposes of the Melbourne Metro Rail Infrastructure Alliance project. The Alliance, Rail Projects Victoria and Metro Trains Melbourne may also have relied upon information provided by other third parties to prepare this document, some of which may not have been verified. Subject to the above conditions, this document may be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated only in its entirety. Metro Tunnel | Rail Infrastructure Alliance Uncontrolled when printed 2 RIA-MGA-EPZ-ZWD-PLA-XEV-NAP-X0001| Revision 02 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................. 5 FOREWORD ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 9 1.2 Metro Tunnel Project ............................................................................................................ 9 1.3 Delivery of the Metro Tunnel Project .................................................................................. 10 2 Approvals Framework ............................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Incorporated Document ...................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Incorporated Document Conditions.................................................................................... 11 2.3 Approved Plans .................................................................................................................. 12 2.3.1 Metro Tunnel Project Plans .................................................................................. 12 2.3.2 Eastern Portal Early Works and Development Plan ......................................... 12 2.3.3 Eastern Portal Development Plan Approval and Amendments ...................... 13 3 Community and Stakeholder Engagement ........................................................................... 14 3.1 Overview of Stakeholders .................................................................................................. 14 3.2 Eastern Portal RIA Development Plan 2019 ...................................................................... 15 3.3 Eastern Portal RIA Development Plan Amendment June 2020 ........................................ 15 3.4 Eastern Portal RIA Development Plan Amendment July 2020 (SER/CER) ...................... 16 4 Site Context .............................................................................................................................. 17 4.1 The Eastern Portal precinct and the Development Plan Area ........................................... 17 4.2 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................. 17 4.3 Strategic Context ................................................................................................................ 20 5 Scope of Works ....................................................................................................................... 22 6 Design Response .................................................................................................................... 24 6.1 Design Overview ................................................................................................................ 25 6.2 Consistency with the Urban Design Strategy Key Directions ............................................ 27 6.3 Consistency with Precinct Specific Design Issues ............................................................. 29 6.4 Aspect Specific Design ...................................................................................................... 30 6.4.1 Architecture ............................................................................................................. 30 6.4.2 Community Experience ......................................................................................... 32 6.4.3 Access ..................................................................................................................... 34 6.4.4 Safety and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design ....................... 36 6.4.5 Street Furniture and Integrated Art ..................................................................... 37 6.4.6 Lighting .................................................................................................................... 37 6.4.7 Signage and Wayfinding ....................................................................................... 37 6.4.8 Materials and Finishes .......................................................................................... 37 6.4.9 Landscape and Water Sensitive Urban Design ................................................ 40 6.4.10 Managing Construction Impacts .......................................................................... 41 6.5 Consistency with Environmental Management Framework ............................................... 41 Metro Tunnel | Rail Infrastructure Alliance Uncontrolled when printed 3 RIA-MGA-EPZ-ZWD-PLA-XEV-NAP-X0001| Revision 02 6.5.1 Managing Construction Impacts .......................................................................... 43 7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 45 APPENDIX A EASTERN PORTAL SITE LAYOUT PLANS ............................................................... A APPENDIX B EASTERN PORTAL ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE, PUBLIC REALM AND URBAN DESIGN PLANS AND ELEVATIONS ......................................................... B APPENDIX C EASTERN PORTAL URBAN DESIGN STRATEGY RESPONSE ............................. C APPENDIX D EASTERN PORTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS DESIGN RESPONSE .............................................................................................. D TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1 Metro Tunnel Project ................................................................................................. 10 Figure 2 Site Context Plan ....................................................................................................... 19 Figure 3 Site Concept Plan ...................................................................................................... 26 Figure 4 Indicative design intent.............................................................................................. 32 Figure 5 Movement Map ........................................................................................................... 35 Figure 6 Indicative materials and finishes palette, demonstrating the design intent ....... 39 Figure 7: Indicative materials and finishes palette for the SER/CER compound................. 39 Figure 8 Indicative landscaping solution ................................................................................ 40 TABLE OF TABLES Table 1 Abbreviations, Terms and Definitions ....................................................................... 5 Table 2 Incorporated Document Conditions relevant to the Plan ..................................... 11 Table 3 Integration of the UDS during the development .................................................... 27 Table 4 Precinct 8: Eastern Portal (South Yarra) Precinct Specific Issues ..................... 29 Table 5 Risk and impact mitigation strategies associated with the design response .... 43 Table 6 Eastern Portal Urban Design Strategy Objectives ................................................ 48 Table 7 Eastern Portal EPRs Design Response ................................................................. 84 Metro Tunnel | Rail Infrastructure Alliance Uncontrolled when printed 4 RIA-MGA-EPZ-ZWD-PLA-XEV-NAP-X0001| Revision 02 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS Table 1 Abbreviations, Terms and Definitions Abbreviation Term Definition BNV Bicycle Network Victoria’s biggest bike riding organisation that aims to Victoria build places to ride, change behaviours and support riders. BSGC Metro Tunnel
Recommended publications
  • Metro Trains Melbourne Metrotrains.Com.Au Public

    Metro Trains Melbourne Metrotrains.Com.Au Public

    PTV Contact Centre • Always travel with a valid myki 1800 800 007 Mon-Fri: 6am-Midnight • Do not run at stations or on platforms Sat-Sun: 24 hours • Stand behind the yellow line on platforms Please provide full contact details to enable our team to • Hold the handrail on the escalators fully investigate your correspondence. • Be mindful of other passengers – keep If you’re not satisfied with our response, you can escalate music to a minimum, remove your your feedback to the PTV Customer Relations team – or the backpack before boarding and take your Public Transport Ombudsman, an independent office that litter with you investigates and provides fair, free and fast resolutions to public transport disputes. • Keep a firm hold of your pram at all times • See a staff member if assistance is required Metro Trains Melbourne • All stations and trains are no smoking areas metrotrains.com.au • Assistance animals can travel on our Public Transport Victoria services ptv.vic.gov.au • Pets may travel on trains, with all dogs to Ticketing be muzzled and on leads ptv.vic.gov.au/tickets • Folding bikes only are welcome on Travellers Aid replacement bus services travellersaid.org.au • Petrol powered skateboards and scooters Public Transport Ombudsman are prohibited on all services ptovic.com.au [email protected] Customer service queries SMS: 0428 789 329 Weekdays: 7am-7pm Weekends and public holidays: 9am-5pm Interpreter Service (03) 9610 7512 (03) 9321 5450 Open from 8am-5pm, except public holidays • Consistent and dependable services • Safe, clean and accessible services • Timely, accurate and personalised information We monitor your safety with CCTV cameras at our stations and on our trains and we work closely with While we want your journey to run as smoothly as • Engaged and enabled team members Victoria Police, including having Protective Service possible, sometimes essential maintenance, upgrade Officers (PSOs) visible at stations and on services after works or unexpected events cause us to make changes to Metro’s Customer Charter is our promise to you of how we 6PM.
  • Heritage Citation Report

    Heritage Citation Report

    HERITAGE CITATION REPORT Name Argo Street Bridge Address Argo Street SOUTH YARRA Significance Level A2 Place Type Road Bridge Citation Date 2013 Argo Street Bridge Recommended VHR No HI No PS Yes Heritage Protection History and Historical Context Stonnington Railways Rail travel was introduced to Victoria in the 1850s by private companies, including the Melbourne and Suburban Railway Company, who opened a line from the Finders Street to St Kilda in 1857. In 1859-60, this line was extended to Brighton by the St Kilda and Brighton Railway Company, via a loop line to a Windsor (originally known as Chapel Street Station). The loop line was conveyed across St Kilda Road on a timber bridge.[1] In 1858, the Melbourne and Suburban Railway Company began work on a line from Princes Bridge Railway Station to Windsor. The first stage from Princes Bridge to a temporary station at Punt Road, Richmond opened for public traffic in February 1859.[2] An extension to Cremorne, on the north bank of the Yarra, was opened in December 1859.[3] In 1860. the railway line was carried across the Yarra on an iron bridge to stations at Gardiner's Creek Road (now South Yarra station), Greville Street (now Prahran station) and Chapel Street (now Windsor station). Substantial engineering Argo Street Bridge 10-Oct-2014 10:05 AM Hermes No 195811 Place Citation Report Page 1 HERITAGE CITATION REPORT works altered the landscape for this line, including an embankment constructed across the swamp south of the Yarra River, and a deep cutting through Forrest Hill. Melbourne's rail network at this time was disjointed, with various private companies operating from three separate city terminals, at Princes Bridge, Flinders Street and Spencer Street.
  • Draft Amendment Documents for Planning Scheme Amendment BAYSIDE PLANNING SCHEME

    Draft Amendment Documents for Planning Scheme Amendment BAYSIDE PLANNING SCHEME

    Attachments to Council Report 18 September, 2018 Highett Structure Plan Review Draft Amendment Documents for Planning Scheme Amendment BAYSIDE PLANNING SCHEME 21.02 BAYSIDE KEY ISSUES AND STRATEGIC VISION 17/11/2016 C124 21.02-1 Municipal profile 17/11/2016 C124 Bayside City Council is located eight kilometres south east of Melbourne. The municipality is largely characterised by its proximity to Port Phillip Bay and its 17 kilometres of coast line. It is this proximity to the coast that has been most influential in the development of Bayside, both historically and today. Bayside was originally settled in 1841 and used for agricultural purposes, however with the 1850’s boom associated with the gold rush, it soon emerged as a popular destination for holiday makers and day trippers from Melbourne, including many wealthy citizens who constructed grand homes on large allotments with substantial gardens. This early settlement, particularly in the northern part of the municipality has influenced the development of Bayside today and many of the features and buildings of that period remain and have heritage significance. This historic settlement also influenced the coastal areas around Beaumaris, which developed a more low scale development and retained a significant portion of the coastal vegetation that defines the southern parts of the municipality. Development of Bayside has historically centred around defined ‘villages’ or activity centres which are a focus for retail, entertainment, employment and are accessible by public transport. This development pattern continues today. Each of these ‘villages’ has a defined character which is highly regarded by the local community. The remainder of the residential areas are focused around larger allotments, enabling the establishment of private gardens which have matured and now dominate streetscapes.
  • Transport and Access

    Transport and Access

    BAYSIDE PLANNING SCHEME 21.09 TRANSPORT AND ACCESS 09/05/2013 C100 Proposed This Clause provides local content to support Clause 18 (Transport) of the State Planning C124 Policy Framework. Overview Bayside is serviced by rail, a tram and buses; however there are large areas of the municipality which rely principally on the private motor vehicle for transport. The eastern boundary of the municipality is well serviced by the Frankston railway line, which has stations at Moorabbin (within Kingston City Council), Highett and Cheltenham. The State Government is currently progressing the establishment of a train station adjacent to the Southland Shopping Centre, an Activity Centre and area identified to support growth. The Sandringham railway line also dissects the northern and central sections of the municipality with stations at Elsternwick (within Glen Eira), Gardenvale, North Brighton, Middle Brighton, Brighton Beach, Hampton and Sandringham. This service does not extend to Black Rock and Beaumaris and these areas rely solely on bus services. Trams are restricted to a single route in Brighton East running along Hawthorn Road, terminating at the Nepean Highway. Bus services are provided throughout the municipality. The Nepean Highway is the major arterial road linking the municipality to the Melbourne CBD to the north and the south eastern suburbs and Mornington Peninsula to the south. There are also a number of primary and secondary arterial roads including Beach Road, North Road, South Road, Centre Road, Bluff Road and Balcombe Road which traverse the municipality. Bayside is serviced by the Sandringham and Frankston railway lines with a total of 9 stations, in addition there are 15 bus routes linking major shopping centres, Monash University, Central Melbourne and other suburbs.
  • RAIL and TRAM NEWS High Speed Railway Fullerton

    RAIL and TRAM NEWS High Speed Railway Fullerton

    AUSTRALASIAN TIMETABLE NEWS No. 256, December 2013 ISSN 1038-3697 RRP $4.95 Published by the Australian Timetable Association www.aattc.org.au RAIL AND TRAM NEWS High Speed Railway Fullerton. “The Australian Rail Track Corporation will, under On 8 November the new Federal government abolished the the guidance of the implementation group, work with High Speed Rail Advisory Committee. interested parties to construct the inland rail project through a staged 10-year schedule,” he said. On 28 November Federal Labor frontbencher, and former Transport Minister, Anthony Albanese, said he would Mr Truss also declared the Federal government's introduce legislation to Parliament to facilitate work on the commitment to looking at a new 24/7 dedicated freight line to proposed Melbourne-Canberra-Sydney-Brisbane high-speed the Port of Brisbane. railway. The former government budgeted the project at $114 billion, to be operational by 2065 with 84 million Infrastructure: promises, promises passengers a year. "If we don't start planning now for the The Victorian Labor Opposition has promised expenditure of possibility of high-speed rail, it will never happen," Mr $300 million to commence work on the Melbourne Metro Albanese said. "When Parliament resumes next week I will cross-city underground rail line and removal of 50 level be introducing a private member's bill that would require the crossings, if elected, and contingent on a Federal Commonwealth to begin work immediately on securing a contribution. corridor for a future high-speed rail line. The bill would Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Infrastructure and include the establishment of a high-speed rail authority made Regional Development, Warren Truss, has called for a up of federal, state and industry stakeholders.
  • Managing the Performance of Rail Franchisees Recorded

    Managing the Performance of Rail Franchisees Recorded

    This presentation provides an overview of the Victorian Auditor-General’s report Managing the Performance of Rail Franchisees. 1 Public transport is an essential service for many Victorians, and is critical to the state’s economic development. Public Transport Victoria (PTV) manages the contracts with the operators that run the metropolitan passenger train and tram networks, known as franchise agreements. These commenced in 2009 after a competitive tender process. Since 2009 the state has paid over $7.6 billion to the franchisees to run Victoria’s train and tram networks—$5.4 billion to Metro Trains Melbourne and $2.2 billion to Yarra Trams, up to 30 June 2016. PTV has commenced negotiations with the existing operators for a potential seven-year extension. This presents a significant opportunity to address weaknesses in the current agreements and seek improvements in the new franchise agreements, which will be known as MR4. 2 We examined whether PTV’s management of the franchise agreements is delivering value for money, including their oversight of maintenance and renewal of the train and tram assets leased to franchisees. We also examined PTV’s planning for the extension of the franchise agreements. 3 Train and tram services have become more reliable and punctual under the current franchise agreements, and customer satisfaction has improved. However, weaknesses in the design and implementation of the performance regimes prevent PTV from maximising value from the current agreements. There are significant weaknesses in how PTV oversees the maintenance and renewal of assets leased to its franchisees under the current agreements. In particular, PTV does not have adequate medium- to long-term asset strategies for its train and tram network assets and has poor knowledge of asset condition.
  • Sandringham Train Timetable Pdf

    Sandringham Train Timetable Pdf

    Sandringham train timetable pdf Continue SandringhamOverviewService typeCommuter railStatusOperationalLocaleMelbourne, Victoria, AustraliaCurrent operator(s)Metro TrainsRouteStartFlinders StreetStops14 (excluding City Loop stations)EndSandringhamDistance travelled17.9 km (11.1 mi)Average journey time30 minutesService frequency6–11 minutes weekdays peak15 minutes weekday daytime off-peak20 minutes weekday evenings off-peak and weekends60 minutes early weekend morningsLine(s) usedCity Loop (weekends)SandringhamOn-board servicesDisabled accessYesTechnicalRolling stockComeng, SiemensTrack gauge1,600 mm (5 ft 3 in)Electrification1500 V DC overheadTrack owner(s)VicTrackRoute map Legend km Zone Multiple lines●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● via North Melbourne North East and Western linesto ● Albury, Central (Sydney) & Adelaide Parklands Southern Cross ●●●●●●● 1 Flagstaff ●●●●●■■■ 1 Melbourne Central ■■■■■■■■■■ 1 Parliament ●●■■■■■■■ 1 0.0 Flinders Street ●●●●●●●● 1 Hurstbridge lineto ● Hurstbridge & ● South Morang 2.4 Richmond ●●●●●●■ 1 Healesville line●●●● via Burnley CityLink Yarra River 4.2 South Yarra ●●●■ 1 Orbost and Stony Point lines●●●●● via Hawksburn 5.5 Prahran ■ 1 St Kilda – Windsor lineto St Kilda 6.2 Windsor ■ 1 7.8 Balaclava ■■ 1 8.6 Ripponlea 1 9.8 Elsternwick ■ 1 Rosstown Railwayto Oakleigh 11.0 Gardenvale 1 12.0 North Brighton 1/2 13.3 Middle Brighton 1/2 14.7 Brighton Beach 1/2 16.5 Hampton 2 17.9 Sandringham 2 SandringhamOverwerWesterOwnerOwnExelLocale, Victoria, Victoria, AustraliaTermin Flinders StreetSanderinghamStations14ServiceSandringhamHistory1857 (1857)Completed1859 (1859)Technical line length17.9 km (11.1 miles)Number of tracks2Track track1600 mm (5 feet 3 inches)Electification1500 V DC over the Sandringham railway line of the suburban railway line in Melbourne Australia. It branches from other south-east commuter rail lines (withdrawal as Caulfield Group) at South Yarra station. It serves the town of Bayside, and small areas cover the cities of Glen Ayr, Port Phillip, Stonnington and Yarra.
  • Grampians and Barwon South West Region Passenger Services Cost & Feasibility Study

    Grampians and Barwon South West Region Passenger Services Cost & Feasibility Study

    GRAMPIANS AND BARWON SOUTH WEST REGION PASSENGER SERVICES COST & FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT March 2017 John Hearsch Consulting Pty Ltd 2 Steering Committee Peter Brown, CEO, Horsham Rural City Council Andrew Evans, CEO, Ararat Rural City Council Michael McCarthy, Director Shire Futures, Southern Grampians Shire Council Maree McNeilly, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Angela Daraxaglou, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Chris Banger, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Jozef Vass, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Study Co-ordinator: Susan Surridge, Horsham Rural City Council Study Team John Hearsch, Study Director Dr Bill Russell Peter Don Participating Councils Ararat Rural City Council Northern Grampians Shire Glenelg Shire Southern Grampian Shire Hindmarsh Shire West Wimmera Shire Horsham Rural City Council Yarriambiack Shire Grampians and Barwon South West Passenger Services Cost & Feasibility Study– John Hearsch Consulting Pty Ltd, Page 2 3 GRAMPIANS AND BARWON SOUTH WEST REGION PASSENGER SERVICES COST & FEASIBILITY STUDY Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 6 Findings ............................................................................................................................ 8 Recommendations ..........................................................................................................
  • SPECIAL Victoria Government Gazette

    SPECIAL Victoria Government Gazette

    Victoria Government Gazette No. S 258 Wednesday 26 June 2019 By Authority of Victorian Government Printer Transport Integration Act 2010 TRANSPORT RESTRUCTURING ORDER (ROADS CORPORATION) NO. 1/2019 Order in Council This Order may be cited as the Transport Restructuring Order (Roads Corporation) No. 1/2019. The Governor in Council under Division 2 of Part 4A of the Transport Integration Act 2010 orders that: 1. Commencement This Order comes into operation on 1 July 2019. 2. Definitions 2.1 In this Order – ‘conferred functions’ means the functions conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria by paragraph 3 of this Order. 2.2 Terms used in this Order have the same meaning as that term has in the Transport Integration Act 2010, unless the context otherwise requires. 3. Conferred functions The functions specified in Part A of Schedule 1 are conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria. 4. Ongoing and concurrent conferral 4.1 The conferred functions are conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria on an ongoing basis. 4.2 The conferred functions are to be performed or exercised concurrently by the Head, Transport for Victoria and the Roads Corporation (meaning that each of the Head, Transport for Victoria and the Roads Corporation may exercise the functions independently of the other). 5. Effect of conferral on the Head, Transport for Victoria The conferred functions are conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria only to the extent that the exercise or performance of the function does not require the exercise of a function, power or duty conferred exclusively on another person or body by or under another Act.
  • Residential Zones Review

    Residential Zones Review

    Managing Residential Development Taskforce Central Subregion Residential Zones State of Play 29 January 2016 © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re­use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN 978­1­76047­024­1 (pdf/online) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone DELWP Customer Service Centre 136 186, email [email protected], via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au RESIDENTIAL ZONES STATE OF PLAY CENTRAL SUBREGION CONTENTS Introduction 1 Central Subregion 5 Melbourne 14 Maribyrnong 19 Port Phillip 26 Stonnington
  • Extract from Book 3)

    Extract from Book 3)

    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY-EIGHTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION Tuesday, 24 February 2015 (Extract from book 3) Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor The Honourable ALEX CHERNOV, AC, QC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable Justice MARILYN WARREN, AC, QC The ministry Premier ......................................................... The Hon. D. M. Andrews, MP Deputy Premier and Minister for Education .......................... The Hon. J. A. Merlino, MP Treasurer ....................................................... The Hon. T. H. Pallas, MP Minister for Public Transport and Minister for Employment ............ The Hon. J. Allan, MP Minister for Industry, and Minister for Energy and Resources ........... The Hon. L. D’Ambrosio, MP Minister for Roads and Road Safety, and Minister for Ports ............. The Hon. L. A. Donnellan, MP Minister for Tourism and Major Events, Minister for Sport and Minister for Veterans .................................................. The Hon. J. H. Eren, MP Minister for Housing, Disability and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health, Minister for Equality and Minister for Creative Industries ........... The Hon. M. P. Foley, MP Minister for Emergency Services, and Minister for Consumer Affairs, Gaming and Liquor Regulation .................................. The Hon. J. F. Garrett, MP Minister for Health and Minister for Ambulance Services .............. The Hon. J. Hennessy, MP Minister for Training and Skills .................................... The Hon. S. R. Herbert, MLC Minister for Local Government, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Minister for Industrial Relations ................................. The Hon. N. M. Hutchins, MP Special Minister of State .......................................... The Hon. G. Jennings, MLC Minister for Families and Children, and Minister for Youth Affairs ...... The Hon. J. Mikakos, MLC Minister for Environment, Climate Change and Water ................
  • Suburban Rail Loop Stage One Project Outline

    Suburban Rail Loop Stage One Project Outline

    Suburban Rail Loop Stage One Project Outline 10/11/2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................... 3 1. Introduction ................................................................. 5 2. SRL ............................................................................... 5 2.1. Need for SRL ................................................................................ 6 2.2. Strategic Context .......................................................................... 8 3. Project Description ................................................... 10 3.1. Proposed Works ......................................................................... 10 3.2. Other Works ............................................................................... 14 3.3. Project Schedule and Delivery ................................................... 16 4. Relevant Legislation ................................................. 18 4.1. Commonwealth Legislation ........................................................ 18 4.2. State Approvals .......................................................................... 18 5. Preliminary Evaluation ............................................. 19 5.1. Summary of further investigations .............................................. 31 6. Community and Stakeholder Engagement ............. 33 6.1. Objectives and Principles ........................................................... 33 6.2. Stakeholder Identification and Engagement ............................... 34 6.3.