DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmental Assessment Thunder Ranch Wind Environmental Assessment July 12, 2019 Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Issuance of an Eagle Incidental Take Permit for Thunder Ranch Wind Prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southwest Region, Division of Migratory Bird Management 500 Gold SW - 8th Floor; Albuquerque NM U.S. Department of the Interior 2019 I Thunder Ranch Wind Environmental Assessment July 12, 2019 Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................. V Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Authorities ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Background ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Project Area .............................................................................................................. 2 1.3.2 Eagle Information and Surveys to Date .......................................................................... 6 1.4 Scoping, consultation and coordination ........................................................................... 6 1.5 Tribal coordination ........................................................................................................... 6 Proposed Action and Alternatives ....................................................................................... 7 2.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Avoidance and Minimization Measures (Appendix A; Section 7) ........................... 7 2.1.2 Post-Construction Monitoring (Appendix A; Section 8) .......................................... 7 2.1.3 Adaptive Management (Appendix A; Section 8)...................................................... 8 2.2 Alternative 1: No Action ................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Other Alternatives ............................................................................................................ 9 2.3.1 Alternative 2: Deny Permit ....................................................................................... 9 Affected Environment .......................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Bald Eagle ...................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.1 Eagle Risk Assessment ........................................................................................... 10 3.1.2 Eagle Use Surveys .................................................................................................. 10 3.1.3 Eagle Nest Surveys ................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Golden Eagle .................................................................................................................. 13 3.3 Migratory Birds .............................................................................................................. 13 II Thunder Ranch Wind Environmental Assessment July 12, 2019 3.4 Species Listed under the Endangered Species Act ......................................................... 14 3.5 Cultural and Socio-economic Interests .......................................................................... 14 3.6 Climate Change .............................................................................................................. 16 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................ 16 4.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................. 16 4.1.1 Bald eagle................................................................................................................ 16 4.1.2 Golden eagle ........................................................................................................... 18 4.1.3 Migratory Birds ....................................................................................................... 18 4.1.4 Species Listed under the Endangered Species Act ................................................. 18 4.2 Alternative 1 – No Action .............................................................................................. 19 4.2.1 Bald eagle................................................................................................................ 19 4.2.2 Golden eagle ........................................................................................................... 19 4.2.3 Migratory Birds ....................................................................................................... 19 4.2.4 Species Listed under the Endangered Species Act ................................................. 19 4.3 Comparison of Effects of Alternatives ........................................................................... 19 4.4 Cumulative Effects ......................................................................................................... 21 Mitigation and Monitoring ................................................................................................. 22 5.1 Voluntary mitigation ...................................................................................................... 22 5.2 Monitoring immediately post-construction .................................................................... 22 5.3 Staff and subcontractor training ..................................................................................... 23 5.4 Post-permit operations staff monitoring ......................................................................... 23 5.5 Five-year post-permit issuance monitoring and reviews................................................ 23 List of Preparers ............................................................................................................................ 24 References ..................................................................................................................................... 25 III Thunder Ranch Wind Environmental Assessment July 12, 2019 List of Tables Table 1. Birds of Conservation Concern in Project vicinity and Project area based on eBird and Applicant Bird and Bat Risk Assessment. .................................................................................... 13 Table 2. Comparison of alternatives for Thunder Ranch Wind. ................................................... 20 List of Figures Figure 1. Project Layout ................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2. Project Groundcover ........................................................................................................ 4 Figure 3. Water Features ................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 4. 2016-2017 Nest Survey Area ........................................................................................ 12 Figure 5. Project Location within the Central Flyway Eagle Management Unit.......................... 15 Appendices Appendix A: Eagle Conservation Plan for Thunder Ranch Wind ................................................. A Appendix B: Eagle Risk Assessment .............................................................................................. B Appendix C: Tribal Coordination ................................................................................................... C Appendix D: Section 7 Biological Evaluation ............................................................................... D IV Thunder Ranch Wind Environmental Assessment July 12, 2019 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations APLIC Avian Power Line Interaction Committee BCC Birds of Conservation Concern BCR Bird Conservation Region CFR Code of Federal Regulations EA Environmental Assessment ECP Eagle Conservation Plan EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMU Eagle Management Unit EOP Eagle Observation Point(s) ESA Endangered Species Act GE General Electric IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation ITP Incidental Take Permit km2 square kilometer(s) LAP Local Area Population lbs. pounds m meter(s) mi2 square miles MW megawatt(s) NEPA National Environmental Policy Act O&M Operations and Maintenance PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement WIRF Wildlife Incident Reporting Form V Thunder Ranch Wind Environmental Assessment July 12, 2019 Introduction This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared to analyze the environmental consequences of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) issuing an incidental take permit (ITP) for the take of bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) associated with the proposed project, Thunder Ranch Wind (or, the Project) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] §§ 4321–4347). Issuance of an ITP by the Service for take that is incidental to otherwise lawful activities under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act; 16 U.S.C. §§
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jenkin Lloyd Jones Jr
    Jenkin Lloyd Jones Jr. Through the headlines of the Tulsa Tribune the Jones family has been a part of local and national history. Chapter 01 – 1:15 Introduction Announcer: The grandfather of Jenkin Lloyd Jones Jr., Richard Lloyd Jones, bought the Tulsa Democrat from Sand Springs founder Charles Page, and turned it into the Tribune. The Tulsa Tribune was an afternoon newspaper and consistently republican; it never endorsed a democrat for U.S. president and did not endorse a democrat for governor until 1958. Jenkin Lloyd Jones Sr. was editor of the Tribune from 1941 to 1988, and publisher until 1991. Jenkin Jones brother Richard Lloyd Jones was the Tribune’s president. Jones Airport in Tulsa is named for Richard Lloyd Jones Jr. Other Jones family members served in various capacities on the paper, including Jenkin’s son, Jenkin Lloyd Jones Jr., who was the last publisher and editor of the paper which closed September 30, 1992. Like other large city evening newspapers, its readership had declined, causing financial losses. Jenk Jones spent thirty-two years at the Tulsa Tribune in jobs ranging from reporter to editor and publisher. He is a member of the Oklahoma Journalism Hall of Fame and the Universtiy of Tulsa Hall of Fame. And now Jenk Jones tells the story of his family and the Tulsa Tribune on Voices of Oklahoma, preserving our state’s history, one voice at a time. Chapter 02 – 12:05 Jones Family John Erling: My name is John Erling and today’s date is February 25, 2011. Jenk, state your full name, please, your date of birth, and your present age.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Territory 1889-1907
    THE DIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE SOME ASPECTS OF LIFE IN THE "LAND OP THE PAIR GOD"; OKLAHOMA TERRITORY, 1889=1907 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OP PHILOSOPHY BY BOBBY HAROLD JOHNSON Norman, Oklahoma 1967 SOME ASPECTS OP LIFE IN THE "LAND OF THE FAIR GOD"; OKLAHOMA TERRITORY, 1889-1907 APPROVED BY DISSERTATION COMMITT If Jehovah delight in us, then he will bring us into this land, and give it unto us; a land which floweth with milk and honey. Numbers li^sS I am boundfor the promised land, I am boundfor the promised land; 0 who will come and go with me? 1 am bound for the promised land. Samuel Stennett, old gospel song Our lot is cast in a goodly land and there is no land fairer than the Land of the Pair God. Milton W, Reynolds, early Oklahoma pioneer ill PREFACE In December, 1892, the editor of the Oklahoma School Herald urged fellow Oklahomans to keep accurate records for the benefit of posterity* "There is a time coming, if the facts can be preserved," he noted, "when the pen of genius and eloquence will take hold of the various incidents con­ nected with the settlement of what will then be the magnifi» cent state of Oklahoma and weave them into a story that will verify the proverb that truth is more wonderful than fic­ tion." While making no claim to genius or eloquence, I have attempted to fulfill the editor's dream by treating the Anglo-American settlement of Oklahoma Territory from 1889 to statehood in 1907» with emphasis upon social and cultural developments* It has been my purpose not only to describe everyday life but to show the role of churches, schools, and newspapers, as well as the rise of the medical and legal professions* My treatment of these salient aspects does not profess to tell the complete story of life in Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDFORD, OKLAHOMA, 1919-1940 by DEBRA DOWNING Bachelor of Arts Southern Nazarene
    AGRICULTURAL CONDITIONS IN THE SOUTHERN PLAINS: MEDFORD, OKLAHOMA, 1919-1940 By DEBRA DOWNING Bachelor of Arts Southern Nazarene University Bethany, Oklahoma 1995 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS May, 1997 AGRICULTURAL CONDITIONS IN THE SOUTHERN PLAINS: MEDFORD, OKLAHOMA, 1919-1940 Thesis Approved: Dean of the Graduate College ii PREFACE The history of a small farming community such as Medford, Oklahoma, is significant to western history for a number of reasons. Medford developed as a typical southern plains town, experiencing boom and bust cycles, and growth and decline. Market, weather, and population patterns affected the prosperity of the town, and as such are good examples of how these phenomena affected a rural, agricultural community in the Southern Plains. Land hungry pioneers established Medford during the Cherokee Strip land rush of 1893. This land rush opened additional Indian lands to white settlement. Overnight the prairie became towns and farms as thousands of eager and optimistic souls sought their future on free lands. Most of these people either had a farming background or aimed to acquire one. The land was only marginally suitable for agriculture during some years, and in fact the United States government had sent explorers into the region early in the nineteenth century, and these men had labeled the region the Great American Desert. Medford residents would learn just what this label meant as they plowed iii up the ground and sought to feed their families and build homes. An agricultural boom occurred in the United States during World War I, as the demand for food to support the war effort, and the mechanization of agriculture, prompted what some have called the great plow-up.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice Issues in the States
    <-I rIO I - j i CRIMINAL JUSTICE ISSUES IN THE STATES 1993 DIRECTORY Volume X Prepared by Karen F.. Gasson-Maline Richard Florence September 1993 Published by - ---- - - - . ---- = :=..=-= ._----..=.. ~..:.=-=.=..= - Justice Research and Statistics Association with support from the Bureau of Justice Statistics JRSA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1992-1993 President Richard P. Kern, Ph.D. Director Criminal Justice Research Institute Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services Vice-Prr ;;;'ident Norman Dakake Director Statistical Analysis Center Rhode Island Governor's Justice Commission Secretary/Treasurer William Holmes, Ph.D. Director Statistical Analysis Center Massachusetts Committee on Criminal Justice Delegate Daniel Storkamp Director 144791 Minnesota Criminal Justice Statistical U.S. Department of Justice Analysis Center National institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the Appointed Delegate person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in Ernest Cowles, Ph.D this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent Assistant Professor the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Center for the Study of Crime, Permission to reproduce this liliiii "giIII!<J material has been Delinquency & Corrections gra~~mic Domain/OJP /BJS Southern Illinois University at Carbondale U.S. Department of JusLice Past President to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Michael J. Sabath, Ph.D. Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission Associate Professor of the ~ owner. San Diego State University Imperial Valley Campus STAFF Joan C. Weiss, Executive Director David Kessler, Ph.D., Director of Research James Zepp, Director, JRSA National Computer Center Sandra E. Leitch, Director of Finance Karen F.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Drug Threat Assessment
    Oklahoma Drug Threat Assessment 2019 Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Control Table of Contents Content Page Executive Summary 1 Introduction 4 Section 1: Current Threat Assessment, by Drug Methamphetamine 6 Marijuana 8 Prescription Opioids 10 Heroin 13 Cocaine 14 Outlook 16 Section 2: Agency Programs and Initiatives Prescription Monitoring Program 17 Safe Trips for Scripts Drug Prevention Program 18 Interdiction Unit 18 Methamphetamine Waste Container Program 19 Oklahoma Drug Endangered Children Program 19 Drug Threat Assessment Project 20 Overdose Detection Mapping Application Program 20 Section 3: District Profiles District Profiles 21 References 35 Appendix Drug Prices in Oklahoma 37 Overdose Deaths, by County 38 Prescription Opioid Overdose Deaths, by County 40 Opioid Drug List 42 Tables and Figures Table/Figure Page Table 1. Overview of Key Drug Indicators 3 Table 2. Oklahoma Demographics 4 Table 3. Top Five Prescription Opioids, by Year 18 Figure 1. Fatal Drug Overdose Rates, by County 5 Figure 2. County Opioid Prescribing Rates, by County 12 Acronyms and Abbreviations COPS Community Oriented Policing Services DEA Drug Enforcement Administration DOC Department of Corrections DTAP Drug Threat Assessment Project DTO Drug Trafficking Organization EPIC El Paso Intelligence Center FDA Food and Drug Administration HIDTA High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area NDTA National Drug Threat Assessment OAC Oklahoma Administrative Code OCME Office of the Chief Medical Examiner ODEC Oklahoma Drug Endangered Children ODMAP Overdose Detection Mapping Application Program ODMHSAS Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services OMMA Oklahoma Medical Marijuana Authority OSBI Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation PMP Oklahoma Prescription Monitoring Program SAMHSA Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration THC Tetrahydrocannabinol Executive Summary The 2019 Oklahoma Drug Threat Assessment provides an overview of current drug trends and emerging drug threats in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Frisco System Magazine, December 1903
    Cou. P. Cilrrnn Printing CQ., St. Louis. I Monarch Pneumatic Tools, )#Ia CA'R ROOFS. RIVETERS, 6 )$I Murphy American Outside Steel Car Roofs. DRILLS, 8 Murphy Improved Winslow (inside) Car Roofs. CHIPPING HAMMERS, 63 FLUE CUTTERS, .,.2 Old Style Winslow Car Roofs. I ETC. '2 Old Style Chicago (corrugated sheets) Car Roofs. 1 SOLD BY- STANDARD RAILWAY EQUIPMENT COMPANY, ST. LOUIS, U. S. A. aldwin Locomotive Works i LOCOMOT~VESOF ALL DESCRIPTIONS. I SINGLE STEAM, EXPANSION COMPRESSED Ir ,. -:- AND Ale COMPOUND. AND ELECTRIC. i L. - I Burnham, Williams & Go., Philadelphia, Pa., U. 8. A. Brink&X SC The Beer That Made MiIwaukee Famous The main difference between good beer and bad beer is in the &er=effect. You notice that pure beer, Schlitz beer, does not make you bilious. Pure beer is good for you; bad beer is unhealthful. You may be absolutely certain of its healthfulness I WHEN YOU DRINK SCHLITZ BEER. This 184b. Car Mwer The Double Glutch Will do the work of a gang of men, saving its cost in a short while. JIANUFACTURED BY Walter A. Zelnicker Supply Co. (Dept. F) 1 RAILWAY, MILL AND FACTORY SUPPLIES. IW SAINT LOUIS. FRISCO SYSTEM MAGAZINE. VOLUME11. DECEMBER, 1903. NUMBER11 CONTENTS. - The World''s Fair in Forty 3Ii1111tes-Illnstrated, . After, . Tah leqnah, 1)ixon's To!wato ~kiiistr;, : ;\Iempliis, t hc Qlieeu City of the Soutli-Ill~~strated, Silk Cultur e iri Texas, . Rich Landsf iu Missouri ope11 fo'r I+ee ~ett~eAent,: The Southviest Alielcl. The Government Fisheries at Neoslio, Missouri, . Valley Park:-Illustrated, Arcleu, . Oklahoma- A Vision, How I Refoxtned Charlie Finche*, .
    [Show full text]
  • INDIANA AUDUBON QUARTERLY VOL. 91, NO. 4 NOVEMBER, 2013 INDIANA AUDUBON SOCIETY, Inc
    INDIANA AUDUBON QUARTERLY VOL. 91, NO. 4 NOVEMBER, 2013 INDIANA AUDUBON SOCIETY, Inc. Founded 1898 Incorporated 1939 OFFICERS President……………………………………………Brad Bumgardner [email protected] Past President……………………………………………..Amy Wilms [email protected] Secretary…………………………………………..............Carl Wilms [email protected] Treasurer………………………………………………….Sally Routh [email protected] Editor Quarterly (Director)……………………………...John Kendall [email protected] Editor Cardinal (Director)………………………………...Scott Arvin [email protected] Webmaster (Director)…………………………………Dick Patterson [email protected] DIRECTORS Term Expires 2013 Term Expires 2014 Term Expires 2015 Bill Cummings Jeff Canada Chuck Mills Ted Meyer Steve Sass Chad Williams Karl Henman John Velasquez Alan Bruner FIELD NOTE/COUNT EDITORS/BIRD RECORDS CHAIR Field Note Editor (Spring)………………………………..........Open Field Note Editor (Summer)…………………………….David Ayer [email protected] Field Note Editor (Fall)…………………………..Brad Bumgardner [email protected] Field Note Editor (Winter)……………………………....Rob Ripma [email protected] May Bird Count and Final Edit Editor…………………..Jay Bolden [email protected] Summer Bird Count Editor……………………………Amy Kearns [email protected] Winter Feeder Count Editor………………………….. John Castrale [email protected] Christmas Count Editors…………………….. Gary & Lisa Bowman [email protected] Indiana Bird Records Committee………………………..Rob Ripma [email protected] TRUSTEES OF THE MARY GRAY/DEVELOPMENT ENDOWMENT FUNDS Rob Ripma Sally Routh Margaret Schwarz MEMBERSHIP COMMITTEE Sally Routh (Chairperson) [email protected] PAST PRESIDENTS OF THE SOCIETY (LIVING) Susanna Arvin Karen Henman Sallie Potter John F. Branham Edward Hopkins Thomas Potter Thomas Brinduse Kathleen Hoover Marge Riemenschneider Alan W. Bruner Rebecca Lewis Paul Steffen Gerald Dryer Jane Miller Carl Wilms Ted Heemstra Dr. Russell Mumford Amy Wilms The INDIANA AUDUBON QUARTERLY (Formerly the Indiana Audubon Society Yearbook) Published in February, May, August and November by The Indiana Audubon Society, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Indiana Audubon
    A GUIDE TO THE “Adventure awaits on the Indiana Birding Trail” From the shores of Lake Michigan to the banks of the Ohio River, and everything in between, Indiana’s INDIANA AUDUBON diverse habitats have supported the documentation of over 400 bird species. 33 22 3 4 21 54 41 63 20 34 23 27 52 5 45 INDIANA BIRDING TRAIL GUIDE 46 TABLE OF CONTENTS 10 Bendix Woods County Park ...................... 3 Miller Beach ........................................... 34 St. Joseph County - NW Porter County - NW 25 Northwest Beverly D. Crone Restoration Area ........... 4 Mississinewa Lake .................................. 35 44 St. Joseph County - NW Miami County - NE 24 Boot Lake Nature Preserve ....................... 5 Monroe Lake .......................................... 36 58 Elkhart County - NE Monroe & Brown County - SW 57 Northeast Brookville Lake ........................................ 6 Mounds State Park ................................. 37 26 18 Franklin County - C Madison County - C 62 15 Brown County State Park ......................... 7 Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge ........ 38 35 Brown County - SE Jackson & Jennings Counties - SE Red numbers on map: Cane Ridge WMA-Tern Bar Slough WDA ....... 8 O’Bannon Woods State Park ................... 39 Correspond to page 49 Gibson County - SW Harrison County - SE numbers in book Celery Bog Nature Area ............................ 9 Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge ........ 40 42 Tippecanoe County - C Pike & Gibson Counties - SW C: Central 28 Chain O’ Lakes State Park ...................... 10 Pigeon River Fish & Wildlife Area ...........41 Noble County - NE LaGrange & Steuben Counties - NE NW: Northwest Charlestown State Park ........................... 11 Pine Creek Gamebird Habitat Area ........ 42 SE: Southeast 47 Clark County - SE Benton County - C 9 Clifty Falls State Park .............................12 Pine Hills Nature Preserve ..................... 43 SW: Southwest Jefferson County - SE Montgomery County - C Cool Creek Park & Nature Center ............13 Pisgah Marsh Fish & Wildlife Area ........
    [Show full text]
  • Agency Solicitation Package (Short)
    State of Oklahoma OK Depart. of Transportation Solicitation Cover Procurement Division Page 1. Solicitation #: 3450004950 / AC0003 2. Solicitation Issue Date: 12/17/20 3. Brief Description of Requirement: Scope of Work: This Solicitation is for Agency Contract #0003 for Post-construction Re-vegetation Seeding with native Plant Species: Provide labor, proper equipment, and materials to seed designated amount of acreage post-construction. Including removal and disposal of all existing vegetation prior to seeding. Location of work to be completed will be assigned by the State. LOCATIONS: Various locations around the State. Attachment B, Pay Item Document lists the Oklahoma Counties to be included in the Contract. The Solicitation is let as a Request for Proposal pursuant to and in accordance with Oklahoma Statute, Title 74, Section 85.12.B.3. As of 03/18/2020 and until further notice, due to concerns about the possible spread of the coronavirus on packages, bids should be submitted to ODOT via email. Electronic bids will still be considered sealed bids and the attachments will not be opened until bid closing. Electronic bids should be emailed to the Buyer handling the solicitation. 1 4. Response Due Date : 01/28/20 Time: 2:00 PM CST/CDT 5. Issued By and RETURN SEALED BID TO2: U.S. Postal Delivery Address: 200 NE 21st Street Room 3C6 Oklahoma City, OK 73105 Common Carrier Delivery Address: See Above Electronic Submission Address: See Note Above 6. Solicitation Type (type “X” at one below): Invitation to Bid Request for Proposal Request for Quote 7. Contracting Officer: Name: Cheryl Emerson, CPO Phone: 405-628-3318; Email: [email protected] 1 Amendments to solicitation may change the Response Due Date (read GENERAL PROVISIONS, section 3, “Solicitation Amendments”).
    [Show full text]
  • Prophet Singer: the Voice and Vision of Woody Guthrie Mark Allan Jackson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2002 Prophet singer: the voice and vision of Woody Guthrie Mark Allan Jackson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Jackson, Mark Allan, "Prophet singer: the voice and vision of Woody Guthrie" (2002). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 135. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/135 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. PROPHET SINGER: THE VOICE AND VISION OF WOODY GUTHRIE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of English By Mark Allan Jackson B.A., Hendrix College, 1988 M.A., University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, 1995 December 2002 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people and institutions should be acknowledged for their help in making my dissertation possible. I have to start off by tipping my hat to certain of my friends, people who first asked me interesting questions or spared with me in argument about music. So I salute Casey Whitt, John Snyder, Cody Walker, Derek Van Lynn, Maxine Beach, and Robin Becker. They helped me see the deep places in America’s music, made me think about its beauty and meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Barn Quilt Tour / Visitor Guide
    166 Indian Trails 177 Crossings 191 Bethlehem Star, 202 Family Star Inc. 2105 Outer Lake Rd. 702 W. Broadway 15 10 Brentwood Drive 1605 E. Broadway Princeton, IN 47670 Princeton, IN 47670 Princeton, IN 47670 Princeton, IN 47670 189 The Maxam House Lake Inwood Dr Zimmerman Dr Bed & Breakfast ood Dr nw * 167 Trip Around 178 Bisected Star to 192 Wedding Ring 203 Memory, Ohio Star, Lyles Station Rd 186 426 Main St Swallowfield Dr ot C hw the World irc oo Dr Whirling Pinwheel, 533 N. Main St. 818 W. Broadway Ln d Ln B I 812-385 -2965 Finch Martin r Windmill 1703 E. Lake Rd. Princeton, IN 47670 I D Princeton, IN 47670 190 e e Ct ok D n I rn ro r r 908 E. Evans St. Princeton, IN 47670 o b o Pine Cove Brentwood Dr Brentwood 191 h w th I t Gibson County o l Princeton, IN 47670 w w il a I a W H H L & N R.R. Fairgrounds Hawthorne Dr Princeton 168 God & Country 179 Mariner’s I Old 193 The Flag 204 Butterfly I 185 Compass 41 65 315 N. Hart St. 449 N. Spore Drive I 214 S. Stormont Forest Park Dr I Princeton, IN 47670 111 10th St. Princeton, IN 47670 Princeton, IN 47670 I Warnock St Warnock St Rd Embree St Southern R.R. I Princeton, IN 47670 Carithers Rd Taft Town Rd I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Glendale St Linhurst Dr I Coal Mine 187188 Fourth St I I Oak St St Fairfield Inn I St 169 Untitled 180 Untitled I Pine St 194 Friendship City 205 God & Country Second St Second H I Ford 41 Blain Brownlee West St Ave 2828 Dixon St Sherman Dr Hall 1246 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Drug Threat Assessment 2020
    Oklahoma Drug Threat Assessment 2020 Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Donnie Anderson, Director State of Oklahoma J. Kevin Stitt Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics Donnie Anderson, Director Chief Agents Mark Stewart, Enforcement Craig Williams, Diversion Mel Woodrow, Special Operations Public Information Officer Mark Woodward Research Director Angie Woodrow Message from Director Anderson Since 1975, the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics has served the citizens of Oklahoma in the quest for a drug free state. This year marks our agency’s 45th anniversary. Over the years, our agency has worked diligently to investigate and eliminate the drug threats in Oklahoma. From the development of the marijuana eradication program in the late 1970’s to the implementation of the modern prescription drug program in recent years, our agency consistently leads the nation in implementing innovative strategies to address the drug threats in our communities. Our agency is committed to working with lawmakers, law enforcement, public health officials, and the citizens of Oklahoma to develop strategies to fight drug issues in our state. The drug threats in our state are always evolving. While methamphetamine remains the greatest drug threat in Oklahoma, we have also seen an increase in counterfeit prescription pills. We know that those who profit from the illicit drug market adapt their operations to avoid detection. OBN, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to aggressively investigate drug trafficking organizations operating in our state. We created this threat assessment to provide information about the drug trends and emerging drug threats in Oklahoma. We would like to thank the 163 law enforcement agencies that completed the annual threat survey in 2020.
    [Show full text]